Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000001007
Amed Natour, Edward Doyle, Robert DeDio, Ravi N Samy
Purpose of review: This systematic review investigates the recent literature and aims to determine the approach, efficacy, and timing of facial nerve decompression with or without grafting in temporal bone fractures with facial palsy.
Recent findings: The surgical management of facial palsy is reserved for a small population of cases in which electrophysiologic tests indicate a poor likelihood of spontaneous recovery. The transmastoid (TM), middle cranial fossa (MCF), and translabyrinthine (TL) approaches to the facial nerve provide access to the entire intracranial and intratemporal segments of the facial nerve. In temporal bone (TB) related facial palsy, the peri-geniculate and labyrinthine portions of the facial nerve are most commonly affected by either direct trauma and/or subsequent edema. When hearing is still serviceable, the combined TM/MCF approach provides the best access to these regions. In the presence of severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), the TL approach is the most appropriate for total facial nerve exploration (this can be done in conjunction with simultaneous cochlear implantation if the cochlear nerve has not been avulsed). Grade I to III House-Brackmann (HB) results can be anticipated in timely decompression of facial nerve injury caused by edema or intraneuronal hemorrhage. Grade III outcomes, with slight weakness and synkinesis, is the outcome to be expected from the use of interpositional grafts or primary neurorrhaphy. In addition to good eye care and the use of systemic steroids (if not contraindicated in the acute trauma setting), surgical decompression with or without grafting/neurorrhaphy may be offered to patients with appropriate electrophysiologic testing, physical examination findings, and radiologic localization of injury.
Summary: Surgery of the facial nerve remains an option for select patients. Here, we discuss the indications and results of treatment as well as the best surgical approach to facial nerve determined based on patient's hearing status and radiologic data. Controversy remains about whether timing of surgery (e.g., immediate vs. delayed intervention) impacts outcomes. However, no one with facial palsy due to a temporal bone fracture should be left with a complete facial paralysis.
综述目的:这篇系统性综述调查了近期的文献,旨在确定颞骨骨折伴面瘫患者面神经减压术(无论是否植皮)的方法、疗效和时机:最近的研究结果:面瘫的手术治疗仅限于电生理测试表明自发恢复可能性较低的少数病例。面神经的经乳突(TM)、中颅窝(MCF)和迷走神经(TL)入路可通达面神经的整个颅内和颞内段。在与颞骨(TB)相关的面神经麻痹中,面神经的耳廓周围和迷走神经部分最常受到直接创伤和/或后续水肿的影响。在听力尚可的情况下,TM/MCF 联合方法可为这些区域提供最佳通道。在存在严重感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的情况下,TL 方法是最适合的面神经全探查方法(如果耳蜗神经没有撕脱,可以同时进行人工耳蜗植入术)。在对水肿或神经元内出血引起的面神经损伤进行及时减压的情况下,可预期获得 I 至 III 级 House-Brackmann (HB) 结果。III 级结果,即轻微无力和同步运动,是使用间置移植或原发性神经出血切除术的预期结果。除了良好的眼部护理和使用全身性类固醇(如果在急性创伤情况下没有禁忌症)外,还可以为有适当电生理测试、体格检查结果和放射学损伤定位的患者提供手术减压,并进行或不进行移植/神经剥脱术。在此,我们将讨论治疗的适应症和结果,以及根据患者的听力状况和放射学数据确定的面神经最佳手术方法。关于手术时机(如立即干预与延迟干预)是否会影响治疗效果,目前仍存在争议。但是,任何因颞骨骨折而导致面瘫的患者都不应该完全面瘫。
{"title":"Temporal bone fracture related facial palsy: efficacy of decompression with and without grafting.","authors":"Amed Natour, Edward Doyle, Robert DeDio, Ravi N Samy","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001007","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This systematic review investigates the recent literature and aims to determine the approach, efficacy, and timing of facial nerve decompression with or without grafting in temporal bone fractures with facial palsy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The surgical management of facial palsy is reserved for a small population of cases in which electrophysiologic tests indicate a poor likelihood of spontaneous recovery. The transmastoid (TM), middle cranial fossa (MCF), and translabyrinthine (TL) approaches to the facial nerve provide access to the entire intracranial and intratemporal segments of the facial nerve. In temporal bone (TB) related facial palsy, the peri-geniculate and labyrinthine portions of the facial nerve are most commonly affected by either direct trauma and/or subsequent edema. When hearing is still serviceable, the combined TM/MCF approach provides the best access to these regions. In the presence of severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), the TL approach is the most appropriate for total facial nerve exploration (this can be done in conjunction with simultaneous cochlear implantation if the cochlear nerve has not been avulsed). Grade I to III House-Brackmann (HB) results can be anticipated in timely decompression of facial nerve injury caused by edema or intraneuronal hemorrhage. Grade III outcomes, with slight weakness and synkinesis, is the outcome to be expected from the use of interpositional grafts or primary neurorrhaphy. In addition to good eye care and the use of systemic steroids (if not contraindicated in the acute trauma setting), surgical decompression with or without grafting/neurorrhaphy may be offered to patients with appropriate electrophysiologic testing, physical examination findings, and radiologic localization of injury.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Surgery of the facial nerve remains an option for select patients. Here, we discuss the indications and results of treatment as well as the best surgical approach to facial nerve determined based on patient's hearing status and radiologic data. Controversy remains about whether timing of surgery (e.g., immediate vs. delayed intervention) impacts outcomes. However, no one with facial palsy due to a temporal bone fracture should be left with a complete facial paralysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"32 5","pages":"294-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000001010
Domen Vozel, Jure Urbančič
Purpose of review: The purpose of this opinion is to review current evidence regarding postoperative management following endoscopic skull base surgery.
Recent findings: Postoperative management encompasses consideration of level of care, laboratory tests, analgetic and antiemetic therapy, antibiotic, antithrombotic and antiepileptic prophylaxis, pharmacological and nonpharmacological cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure reduction measures, including CSF diversion, activity restrictions, nasal packing removal, nasal debridement and toilet, nasal glucocorticoid administration, positive pressure ventilation, imaging, CSF leak diagnosis, and future perspectives.
Summary: Although significant effort has been put into research of postoperative measures after endoscopic skull-base surgery, there is a heterogeneity of practices and deficit of high-level studies, which would enable highly powered systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
{"title":"Postoperative management following endoscopic skull base surgery.","authors":"Domen Vozel, Jure Urbančič","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000001010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000001010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this opinion is to review current evidence regarding postoperative management following endoscopic skull base surgery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Postoperative management encompasses consideration of level of care, laboratory tests, analgetic and antiemetic therapy, antibiotic, antithrombotic and antiepileptic prophylaxis, pharmacological and nonpharmacological cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure reduction measures, including CSF diversion, activity restrictions, nasal packing removal, nasal debridement and toilet, nasal glucocorticoid administration, positive pressure ventilation, imaging, CSF leak diagnosis, and future perspectives.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although significant effort has been put into research of postoperative measures after endoscopic skull-base surgery, there is a heterogeneity of practices and deficit of high-level studies, which would enable highly powered systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-10DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000985
Alyssa M Civantos, Pramila Shakya, David A Shaye
Purpose of review: Tessier number 3 and 4 clefts result from failed fusion of facial processes during embryogenesis, and cause functional, psychosocial, and cosmetic morbidity. Given their rarity and heterogeneity, they present a unique challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, with limited literature for guidance. The purpose of this update is to summarize Tessier number 3 and 4 clefts with a focus on recent literature and expert opinion.
Recent findings: The incidence of atypical facial clefts has been estimated between 1.4 and 4.9 per 100 000 live births. Several retrospective chart reviews have been published in recent years; however, the epidemiologic data remains limited. Surgical management must be individualized and guided by classic reconstructive principles. The goal of surgery is to return the three soft tissue components (lip, nasomalar, and eyelid) to their proper anatomical location.
Summary: Tessier number 3 and 4 clefts are rare, demonstrate a wide spectrum of clinical presentation, and remain challenging to gain a breadth of experience for any single surgeon. They are classified based on their location along well defined anatomical axes. Component repair is performed with attention to the lip, nasomalar, and eyelid regions to restore facial symmetry and function.
{"title":"Atypical facial clefts: Tessier number 3 and 4 clefts.","authors":"Alyssa M Civantos, Pramila Shakya, David A Shaye","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000985","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000985","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Tessier number 3 and 4 clefts result from failed fusion of facial processes during embryogenesis, and cause functional, psychosocial, and cosmetic morbidity. Given their rarity and heterogeneity, they present a unique challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, with limited literature for guidance. The purpose of this update is to summarize Tessier number 3 and 4 clefts with a focus on recent literature and expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The incidence of atypical facial clefts has been estimated between 1.4 and 4.9 per 100 000 live births. Several retrospective chart reviews have been published in recent years; however, the epidemiologic data remains limited. Surgical management must be individualized and guided by classic reconstructive principles. The goal of surgery is to return the three soft tissue components (lip, nasomalar, and eyelid) to their proper anatomical location.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Tessier number 3 and 4 clefts are rare, demonstrate a wide spectrum of clinical presentation, and remain challenging to gain a breadth of experience for any single surgeon. They are classified based on their location along well defined anatomical axes. Component repair is performed with attention to the lip, nasomalar, and eyelid regions to restore facial symmetry and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"248-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-29DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000983
Ethan Fung, Dhruv Patel, Sherard Tatum
Purpose of review: To provide a current review of artificial intelligence and its subtypes in maxillofacial and facial plastic surgery including a discussion of implications and ethical concerns.
Recent findings: Artificial intelligence has gained popularity in recent years due to technological advancements. The current literature has begun to explore the use of artificial intelligence in various medical fields, but there is limited contribution to maxillofacial and facial plastic surgery due to the wide variance in anatomical facial features as well as subjective influences. In this review article, we found artificial intelligence's roles, so far, are to automatically update patient records, produce 3D models for preoperative planning, perform cephalometric analyses, and provide diagnostic evaluation of oropharyngeal malignancies.
Summary: Artificial intelligence has solidified a role in maxillofacial and facial plastic surgery within the past few years. As high-quality databases expand with more patients, the role for artificial intelligence to assist in more complicated and unique cases becomes apparent. Despite its potential, ethical questions have been raised that should be noted as artificial intelligence continues to thrive. These questions include concerns such as compromise of the physician-patient relationship and healthcare justice.
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in maxillofacial and facial plastic and reconstructive surgery.","authors":"Ethan Fung, Dhruv Patel, Sherard Tatum","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000983","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To provide a current review of artificial intelligence and its subtypes in maxillofacial and facial plastic surgery including a discussion of implications and ethical concerns.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Artificial intelligence has gained popularity in recent years due to technological advancements. The current literature has begun to explore the use of artificial intelligence in various medical fields, but there is limited contribution to maxillofacial and facial plastic surgery due to the wide variance in anatomical facial features as well as subjective influences. In this review article, we found artificial intelligence's roles, so far, are to automatically update patient records, produce 3D models for preoperative planning, perform cephalometric analyses, and provide diagnostic evaluation of oropharyngeal malignancies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Artificial intelligence has solidified a role in maxillofacial and facial plastic surgery within the past few years. As high-quality databases expand with more patients, the role for artificial intelligence to assist in more complicated and unique cases becomes apparent. Despite its potential, ethical questions have been raised that should be noted as artificial intelligence continues to thrive. These questions include concerns such as compromise of the physician-patient relationship and healthcare justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"257-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-10DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000982
Kaelan Black
Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to examine the current research of the posterior tongue tie and how it relates to breast feeding, solid feeding, and speech.
Recent findings: Recent findings show that the posterior tongue tie may play a role in effective breast feeding.
Summary: Ankyloglossia is the term used for the restriction of the movement of the tongue that impairs certain functions such as breastfeeding or bottle feeding, feeding with solids, and speech. Cadaver studies have shown that there can be a restriction of the tongue and oral tissues in some people relative to others. In some breast-feeding studies, releasing the posterior tie has been shown to improve certain aspects of tongue movement. There is little evidence for or against posterior tongue ties contributing to other problems such as speech and solid feeding. This article goes into depth about the current studies on posterior ankyloglossia.
{"title":"Posterior tongue tie: that is a thing?","authors":"Kaelan Black","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000982","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this review is to examine the current research of the posterior tongue tie and how it relates to breast feeding, solid feeding, and speech.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent findings show that the posterior tongue tie may play a role in effective breast feeding.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Ankyloglossia is the term used for the restriction of the movement of the tongue that impairs certain functions such as breastfeeding or bottle feeding, feeding with solids, and speech. Cadaver studies have shown that there can be a restriction of the tongue and oral tissues in some people relative to others. In some breast-feeding studies, releasing the posterior tie has been shown to improve certain aspects of tongue movement. There is little evidence for or against posterior tongue ties contributing to other problems such as speech and solid feeding. This article goes into depth about the current studies on posterior ankyloglossia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"282-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141312345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-06DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000978
Annabelle Welham, Eileen Tan-Gore, Rebekah Taylor
Purpose of review: The objective of this article is to understand the uptake in use of Telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic as a way to provide compelling impetus for further research and promotion of Telehealth in general. A data review of Outpatient Department data from 2020 to 2023, as compiled by the Surgical Outcomes improvement Unit.
Recent findings: Telehealth was widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic for clinicians to provide healthcare to patients whilst adhering to strict lockdown guidelines aimed at limiting exposure and spread of the respiratory virus. There has been minimal analysis, however, of the ethical and legal implications of telemedicine. Whilst it seems that access to care is improved via telehealth, there are subtle, inherent barriers intrinsic to it.
Summary: There was a significant increase in the use of audio and audiovisual aids in the delivery of Oral and Maxillofacial Outpatient care during the COVID-19 period. Further analysis and improvements need to be made to the system before it can be considered as sufficient and adequate. Where there is rapid adoption of Telehealth in the delivery of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Services, there must be concurrent rigorous review and update of systems in order to address the key areas of patient safety and accuracy of treatment.
{"title":"The role of telehealth in the delivery of oral and maxillofacial surgery services at a level 6 hospital in New South Wales Australia during COVID-19 - the John Hunter Hospital experience: a commentary, review and cautionary tale for the future.","authors":"Annabelle Welham, Eileen Tan-Gore, Rebekah Taylor","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000978","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000978","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The objective of this article is to understand the uptake in use of Telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic as a way to provide compelling impetus for further research and promotion of Telehealth in general. A data review of Outpatient Department data from 2020 to 2023, as compiled by the Surgical Outcomes improvement Unit.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Telehealth was widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic for clinicians to provide healthcare to patients whilst adhering to strict lockdown guidelines aimed at limiting exposure and spread of the respiratory virus. There has been minimal analysis, however, of the ethical and legal implications of telemedicine. Whilst it seems that access to care is improved via telehealth, there are subtle, inherent barriers intrinsic to it.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There was a significant increase in the use of audio and audiovisual aids in the delivery of Oral and Maxillofacial Outpatient care during the COVID-19 period. Further analysis and improvements need to be made to the system before it can be considered as sufficient and adequate. Where there is rapid adoption of Telehealth in the delivery of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Services, there must be concurrent rigorous review and update of systems in order to address the key areas of patient safety and accuracy of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"263-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140863310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-23DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000981
Alexander P Marston, Travis T Tollefson
Purpose of review: This review aims to examine the indications and anatomical circumstances for when to optimally incorporate buccal myomucosal flaps (BMFs) into palatal surgical reconstruction.
Recent findings: Studies examining outcomes following primary cleft palate repair with incorporation of BMF have demonstrated excellent speech outcomes and low rates of fistula. Furthermore, some reports cite an association of buccal flap use with reduced midface hypoplasia and the need for later orthognathic surgery. When used for secondary speech surgery, BMFs have been shown to lead to speech improvements across multiple outcome measures. Advantages of BMF techniques over conventionally described pharyngeal flap and pharyngoplasty procedures include significant lengthening of the velum, favorable repositioning of the levator muscular sling, and lower rates of obstructive sleep apnea.
Summary: Although the published data demonstrate excellent outcomes with use of BMFs for primary and secondary palatal surgery, there are limited data to conclude superiority over the traditional, more extensively investigated surgical techniques. The authors of this review agree with the evidence that BMF techniques can be useful in primary palatoplasty for congenitally wide clefts, secondary speech surgery for large velopharyngeal gaps, and/or in individuals with a predisposition for airway obstruction from traditional approaches.
{"title":"Update on using buccal myomucosal flaps for patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency: primary and secondary interventions.","authors":"Alexander P Marston, Travis T Tollefson","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000981","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000981","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to examine the indications and anatomical circumstances for when to optimally incorporate buccal myomucosal flaps (BMFs) into palatal surgical reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Studies examining outcomes following primary cleft palate repair with incorporation of BMF have demonstrated excellent speech outcomes and low rates of fistula. Furthermore, some reports cite an association of buccal flap use with reduced midface hypoplasia and the need for later orthognathic surgery. When used for secondary speech surgery, BMFs have been shown to lead to speech improvements across multiple outcome measures. Advantages of BMF techniques over conventionally described pharyngeal flap and pharyngoplasty procedures include significant lengthening of the velum, favorable repositioning of the levator muscular sling, and lower rates of obstructive sleep apnea.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although the published data demonstrate excellent outcomes with use of BMFs for primary and secondary palatal surgery, there are limited data to conclude superiority over the traditional, more extensively investigated surgical techniques. The authors of this review agree with the evidence that BMF techniques can be useful in primary palatoplasty for congenitally wide clefts, secondary speech surgery for large velopharyngeal gaps, and/or in individuals with a predisposition for airway obstruction from traditional approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141249109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-02-23DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000968
Madison Boot, Ryan Winters
Purpose of review: Massive palatal defects resulting from palatoplasty failures arising from cleft palate repair complications present ongoing challenges in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to provide up-to-date insights into aetiology, risk factors, surgical techniques, and adjunctive therapies, aiming to enhance the understanding of such complex cases, and optimize patient outcomes.
Recent findings: Primary palatoplasty has fistula recurrence rates ranging from 2.4% to 55%. Factors such as cleft width, surgical repair method, and patient characteristics, influence the likelihood of failure. Classifications such as the Pakistan Comprehensive Classification and Richardson's criteria aid in assessing defects. Surgical options range from local flaps and revision palatoplasty to regional flaps (e.g., buccinator myomucosal, facial artery-based flaps, tongue flaps, nasal septal flaps) to free microvascular flaps. Alternative approaches include obturator prostheses, and acellular dermal matrix has been used as an adjuvant to multiple repair techniques. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has emerged as an adjunctive therapy to enhance tissue healing.
Summary: This comprehensive review underscores the intricate challenges associated with massive palatal defects resulting from palatoplasty failures. The diverse range of surgical and nonsurgical options emphasizes the importance of patient-centric, individualized approaches. Practitioners, armed with evidence-based insights, can navigate these complexities, offering tailored interventions for improved patient outcomes.
{"title":"Managing massive palatial defect secondary to palatoplasty failures: an in-depth analysis.","authors":"Madison Boot, Ryan Winters","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000968","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000968","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Massive palatal defects resulting from palatoplasty failures arising from cleft palate repair complications present ongoing challenges in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to provide up-to-date insights into aetiology, risk factors, surgical techniques, and adjunctive therapies, aiming to enhance the understanding of such complex cases, and optimize patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Primary palatoplasty has fistula recurrence rates ranging from 2.4% to 55%. Factors such as cleft width, surgical repair method, and patient characteristics, influence the likelihood of failure. Classifications such as the Pakistan Comprehensive Classification and Richardson's criteria aid in assessing defects. Surgical options range from local flaps and revision palatoplasty to regional flaps (e.g., buccinator myomucosal, facial artery-based flaps, tongue flaps, nasal septal flaps) to free microvascular flaps. Alternative approaches include obturator prostheses, and acellular dermal matrix has been used as an adjuvant to multiple repair techniques. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has emerged as an adjunctive therapy to enhance tissue healing.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This comprehensive review underscores the intricate challenges associated with massive palatal defects resulting from palatoplasty failures. The diverse range of surgical and nonsurgical options emphasizes the importance of patient-centric, individualized approaches. Practitioners, armed with evidence-based insights, can navigate these complexities, offering tailored interventions for improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"269-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139934359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000984
David A Shaye
{"title":"The surgical future is here, but it is not evenly distributed.","authors":"David A Shaye","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000984","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000984","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"32 4","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-06-17DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000986
Sarah Bessen, Shekhar K Gadkaree, Adeeb Derakhshan
Purpose of review: The use of piezoelectric instrumentation is increasingly recognized as an alternative to traditional bone-cutting techniques across a wide array of surgeries. Here, we provide an overview of the technique, including device principles, benefits, and drawbacks. We also review its use in craniofacial surgery.
Recent findings: Piezoelectric surgery is a minimally invasive bone-cutting system with lower risk of damage to surrounding soft tissue structures. Indications for its use are rapidly expanding across multiple fields, including craniofacial surgery. To date, piezosurgical techniques have been most widely adopted and studied in the contexts of rhinoplasty, orthognathic surgery, and cranioplasty in craniosynostosis. Piezosurgery can facilitate more precise and consistent osteotomies while decreasing morbidities associated with traditional osteotomy techniques. Primary limitations include cost and concerns regarding increased operative times secondary to operator learning curves and decreased cutting efficiency.
Summary: Piezoelectric surgery represents an alternative to traditional bone-cutting modalities to improve precision, consistency, and safety of osteotomies. Further research is needed to better understand the efficacy of the technique as well as potential for additional applications.
{"title":"Use of piezoelectric instrumentation in craniofacial surgery.","authors":"Sarah Bessen, Shekhar K Gadkaree, Adeeb Derakhshan","doi":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000986","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MOO.0000000000000986","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The use of piezoelectric instrumentation is increasingly recognized as an alternative to traditional bone-cutting techniques across a wide array of surgeries. Here, we provide an overview of the technique, including device principles, benefits, and drawbacks. We also review its use in craniofacial surgery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Piezoelectric surgery is a minimally invasive bone-cutting system with lower risk of damage to surrounding soft tissue structures. Indications for its use are rapidly expanding across multiple fields, including craniofacial surgery. To date, piezosurgical techniques have been most widely adopted and studied in the contexts of rhinoplasty, orthognathic surgery, and cranioplasty in craniosynostosis. Piezosurgery can facilitate more precise and consistent osteotomies while decreasing morbidities associated with traditional osteotomy techniques. Primary limitations include cost and concerns regarding increased operative times secondary to operator learning curves and decreased cutting efficiency.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Piezoelectric surgery represents an alternative to traditional bone-cutting modalities to improve precision, consistency, and safety of osteotomies. Further research is needed to better understand the efficacy of the technique as well as potential for additional applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":55195,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"209-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}