Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-04-23DOI: 10.1159/000546003
Angel Ramos Macías, Ángel Ramos-Macias, Robert Briggs, Byung Yoon Choi, David Friedmann, Akira Ishiyama, Thomas Lenarz, Emmanuel Mylanus, Stephen O Apos Leary, J Thomas Roland, Andrzej Zarowski
Background: Since first introduced in the mid-1980s, cochlear implant (CI) technology has significantly evolved to reach the current state of the art. Commencing with straight, lateral wall electrode arrays, advances in the last decade led to the development of slim perimodiolar arrays that lie closer to the electrically targeted spiral ganglion. Over the years, as a consequence of improving hearing benefits, CI indications have been steadily expanded. Today, individuals with moderately severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, many with residual hearing in the low-frequency range, may receive a CI in one or both ears.
Summary: Before implantation, individual recipient characteristics, such as years of auditory deprivation, hearing thresholds, and speech understanding ability with conventional amplification, can have an effect on CI hearing outcomes. Also individuals with normal hearing/mild hearing loss in the low frequencies can also qualify for CI. Surgical procedures such as careful, soft surgery techniques are imperative to reduce cochlear trauma and optimize outcomes and can be supported by surgical guidance tools and drug therapies to help preserve the delicate intracochlear structures and also for patients with single-side deafness. Histopathological investigations provide evidence that support the design concept of slim perimodiolar electrode arrays. Modiolar proximity and scalar tympani location permit energy-efficient, focused electrical stimulation of the targeted neural interface, while minimizing injury to the fine structures of the intracochlear lateral wall and its blood supply.
Key messages: Modiolar electrode arrays may provide highly consistent scala tympani placement and modiolar proximity which may improve functional hearing outcomes, compared to lateral wall electrode array results. Modiolar proximity can result in narrower spread of excitation, reduced channel interaction, lower electrical stimulation thresholds and may improve speech understanding. Reservation of functional residual low-frequency hearing is possible with both straight and perimodiolar electrode arrays.
{"title":"The Importance of the Electrode-Neural Interface in Supporting Long-Term Outcomes in Cochlear Implantation: Expert Opinion.","authors":"Angel Ramos Macías, Ángel Ramos-Macias, Robert Briggs, Byung Yoon Choi, David Friedmann, Akira Ishiyama, Thomas Lenarz, Emmanuel Mylanus, Stephen O Apos Leary, J Thomas Roland, Andrzej Zarowski","doi":"10.1159/000546003","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since first introduced in the mid-1980s, cochlear implant (CI) technology has significantly evolved to reach the current state of the art. Commencing with straight, lateral wall electrode arrays, advances in the last decade led to the development of slim perimodiolar arrays that lie closer to the electrically targeted spiral ganglion. Over the years, as a consequence of improving hearing benefits, CI indications have been steadily expanded. Today, individuals with moderately severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, many with residual hearing in the low-frequency range, may receive a CI in one or both ears.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Before implantation, individual recipient characteristics, such as years of auditory deprivation, hearing thresholds, and speech understanding ability with conventional amplification, can have an effect on CI hearing outcomes. Also individuals with normal hearing/mild hearing loss in the low frequencies can also qualify for CI. Surgical procedures such as careful, soft surgery techniques are imperative to reduce cochlear trauma and optimize outcomes and can be supported by surgical guidance tools and drug therapies to help preserve the delicate intracochlear structures and also for patients with single-side deafness. Histopathological investigations provide evidence that support the design concept of slim perimodiolar electrode arrays. Modiolar proximity and scalar tympani location permit energy-efficient, focused electrical stimulation of the targeted neural interface, while minimizing injury to the fine structures of the intracochlear lateral wall and its blood supply.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Modiolar electrode arrays may provide highly consistent scala tympani placement and modiolar proximity which may improve functional hearing outcomes, compared to lateral wall electrode array results. Modiolar proximity can result in narrower spread of excitation, reduced channel interaction, lower electrical stimulation thresholds and may improve speech understanding. Reservation of functional residual low-frequency hearing is possible with both straight and perimodiolar electrode arrays.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"459-470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144053425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-06-04DOI: 10.1159/000546670
Zahra Polat, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Sema Satıcı, Reyhan Sürmeli, Mehmet Sürmeli
Introduction: The clinical saccadometry test is an ocular motor test that provides a functional assessment of the brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of saccadic eye movements. Clinical saccadometry is thought to be more sensitive to concussions and neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of our study was to compare healthy individuals with individuals diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using a saccadometry test, and to evaluate pro-saccade and anti-saccade performances.
Methods: The study included 32 patients (mean age: 41 ± 11.88 years) between the ages of 18-60 years with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and a healthy control group of 28 individuals (mean age: 37.3 ± 12.2 years). Spontaneous nystagmus, gaze, random saccade, pursuit, and optokinetic and saccadometry tests included in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery were performed for all participants.
Results: There were no significant differences in random saccade (RS) latencies between the groups (p > 0.05). However, the pro-saccade and anti-saccade latencies were significantly prolonged in the multiple sclerosis (MS) group (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in peak velocity and accuracy for random saccades, pro-saccades, and anti-saccades (p > 0.05). Directional error rates in the pro-saccade and anti-saccade tests were significantly different between the MS and control groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The findings of our study show that there are significant differences in saccadometry test results between MS patients and healthy participants. Therefore, the clinical saccadometry test, which is newly added to the VNG test battery and offers short and noninvasive evaluation, could be included in the vestibular test battery for neurodegenerative diseases such as MS.
{"title":"Evaluation of Saccadic Abnormalities in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Novel Clinical Saccadometry Test.","authors":"Zahra Polat, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Sema Satıcı, Reyhan Sürmeli, Mehmet Sürmeli","doi":"10.1159/000546670","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546670","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical saccadometry test is an ocular motor test that provides a functional assessment of the brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of saccadic eye movements. Clinical saccadometry is thought to be more sensitive to concussions and neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of our study was to compare healthy individuals with individuals diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using a saccadometry test, and to evaluate pro-saccade and anti-saccade performances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 32 patients (mean age: 41 ± 11.88 years) between the ages of 18-60 years with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and a healthy control group of 28 individuals (mean age: 37.3 ± 12.2 years). Spontaneous nystagmus, gaze, random saccade, pursuit, and optokinetic and saccadometry tests included in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery were performed for all participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in random saccade (RS) latencies between the groups (p > 0.05). However, the pro-saccade and anti-saccade latencies were significantly prolonged in the multiple sclerosis (MS) group (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in peak velocity and accuracy for random saccades, pro-saccades, and anti-saccades (p > 0.05). Directional error rates in the pro-saccade and anti-saccade tests were significantly different between the MS and control groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our study show that there are significant differences in saccadometry test results between MS patients and healthy participants. Therefore, the clinical saccadometry test, which is newly added to the VNG test battery and offers short and noninvasive evaluation, could be included in the vestibular test battery for neurodegenerative diseases such as MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"480-491"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144227711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-07DOI: 10.1159/000546962
Qusai Tawakkul, Shahad Alsanosi, Asma Alahmadi, Sarah Alarifi, Murad Al-Momani, Ahmad Aldhafeeri, Salman Alhabib
Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) has emerged as a promising intervention for children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). Several studies have investigated the efficacy of CIs in children with ANSD, demonstrating improvements in auditory performance and language skills following implantation. Whether the benefits and outcomes of CIs in children with ANSD are comparable to children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is still debatable. The present updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the outcomes of CI for children with ANSD compared to children with SNHL.
Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted on studies that included pediatric patients and the outcomes of CI in patients with ANSD versus SNHL were compared. A comprehensive search was performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).
Results: Fourteen studies (number of patients = 722 patients) were included. The total number of patients in the ANSD and SNHL groups in the present systematic review was 212 and 520, respectively. The most utilized assessment tests were the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) and Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) scores. The pooled estimate showed that patients with ANSD had comparable CAP scores compared to patients with SNHL (MD: -0.52, 95% CI [-1.34, 0.29], p = 0.21). Likewise, three studies reported the SIR after CI and showed comparable findings between ANSD and SNHL patients. The pooled estimate showed that patients with ANSD had comparable SIR scores compared to patients with SNHL (MD: -0.26, 95% CI [-0.65, 0.13], p = 0.19).
Conclusion: While the results show mixed findings across various outcome measures, the overall impact of CI on speech recognition and language development appears to be positive and comparable between ANSD and SNHL.
背景:人工耳蜗植入术(CI)已成为治疗儿童听神经病变谱系障碍(ANSD)的一种很有前景的干预手段。几项研究已经调查了人工耳蜗对患有ANSD的儿童的疗效,证明了植入后听觉表现和语言技能的改善。在患有ANSD的儿童中,CIs的益处和结果是否与患有感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)的儿童相当仍有争议。目前更新的系统综述和荟萃分析评估了与SNHL儿童相比,ANSD儿童CI的结果。方法:对包括儿科患者的研究进行荟萃分析,比较ANSD患者和SNHL患者CI的结果。使用以下电子数据库进行全面检索:PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、EBSCOhost和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)。结果:。14项研究(no。纳入722例患者。在本系统综述中,ANSD组和SNHL组的患者总数分别为212例和520例。最常用的评估测试是语音清晰度评级(SIR)和听觉表现类别(CAP)分数。合并估计结果显示,ANSD患者的CAP评分与SNHL患者相当(MD为-0.52,95% CI [-1.34, 0.29], P =0.21,)。同样,三项研究报告了CI后的SIR,并在ANSD和SNHL患者之间显示了相似的结果。汇总估计显示,与SNHL患者相比,ANSD患者的SIR评分相当(MD为-0.26,95% CI [-0.65, 0.13], P =0.19)。结论:虽然结果显示不同结果测量的结果不同,但CI对语音识别和语言发展的总体影响似乎是积极的,并且在ANSD和SNHL之间具有可比性。
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Qusai Tawakkul, Shahad Alsanosi, Asma Alahmadi, Sarah Alarifi, Murad Al-Momani, Ahmad Aldhafeeri, Salman Alhabib","doi":"10.1159/000546962","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000546962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear implantation (CI) has emerged as a promising intervention for children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). Several studies have investigated the efficacy of CIs in children with ANSD, demonstrating improvements in auditory performance and language skills following implantation. Whether the benefits and outcomes of CIs in children with ANSD are comparable to children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is still debatable. The present updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the outcomes of CI for children with ANSD compared to children with SNHL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis was conducted on studies that included pediatric patients and the outcomes of CI in patients with ANSD versus SNHL were compared. A comprehensive search was performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies (number of patients = 722 patients) were included. The total number of patients in the ANSD and SNHL groups in the present systematic review was 212 and 520, respectively. The most utilized assessment tests were the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) and Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) scores. The pooled estimate showed that patients with ANSD had comparable CAP scores compared to patients with SNHL (MD: -0.52, 95% CI [-1.34, 0.29], p = 0.21). Likewise, three studies reported the SIR after CI and showed comparable findings between ANSD and SNHL patients. The pooled estimate showed that patients with ANSD had comparable SIR scores compared to patients with SNHL (MD: -0.26, 95% CI [-0.65, 0.13], p = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the results show mixed findings across various outcome measures, the overall impact of CI on speech recognition and language development appears to be positive and comparable between ANSD and SNHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"545-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144585722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to narrow-band chirps (NB-chirps) for estimating hearing levels in children.
Design: Thresholds from the NB-chirp ASSR were evaluated in 30 sedated children with normal hearing or hearing loss. The correlation between the NB-chirp ASSR and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds was analyzed, and the difference score (DS) between these thresholds was calculated. Data from the NB-chirp ASSR were compared to retrospective data from conventional ASSR to exponentially amplitude-modulated tones in 25 sedated children.
Results: Positive correlations between the NB-chirp ASSR and PTA thresholds were found at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz. Multiple comparisons of the DSs for the NB-chirp ASSR and PTA revealed significant differences at 500-2,000 Hz and 4,000 Hz, as well as 1,000-2,000 Hz, and 4,000 Hz. Comparisons of the DSs demonstrated that the DS of the NB-chirp ASSR was significantly smaller than that of the conventional ASSR at 2,000 Hz. Furthermore, the testing times for the NB-chirp ASSR were significantly shorter than those for the conventional ASSR.
Conclusion: The NB-chirp ASSR closely reflected the PTA thresholds, and the testing time was shorter than that of the conventional ASSR. Thus, this study demonstrated that the NB-chirp ASSR is useful for hearing threshold estimation in children.
{"title":"Estimation of Hearing Thresholds with Auditory Steady-State Responses to Narrow-Band Chirps in Children.","authors":"Hiroyuki Chiba, Tsukasa Ito, Toshinori Kubota, Hirooki Matsui, Chikako Shinkawa, Seiji Kakehata","doi":"10.1159/000541180","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000541180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) to narrow-band chirps (NB-chirps) for estimating hearing levels in children.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Thresholds from the NB-chirp ASSR were evaluated in 30 sedated children with normal hearing or hearing loss. The correlation between the NB-chirp ASSR and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds was analyzed, and the difference score (DS) between these thresholds was calculated. Data from the NB-chirp ASSR were compared to retrospective data from conventional ASSR to exponentially amplitude-modulated tones in 25 sedated children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive correlations between the NB-chirp ASSR and PTA thresholds were found at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz. Multiple comparisons of the DSs for the NB-chirp ASSR and PTA revealed significant differences at 500-2,000 Hz and 4,000 Hz, as well as 1,000-2,000 Hz, and 4,000 Hz. Comparisons of the DSs demonstrated that the DS of the NB-chirp ASSR was significantly smaller than that of the conventional ASSR at 2,000 Hz. Furthermore, the testing times for the NB-chirp ASSR were significantly shorter than those for the conventional ASSR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NB-chirp ASSR closely reflected the PTA thresholds, and the testing time was shorter than that of the conventional ASSR. Thus, this study demonstrated that the NB-chirp ASSR is useful for hearing threshold estimation in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"89-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1159/000540576
Alexander Stutley, Caris Bogdanov, Marcus Windsor Rao Voola, Peter Friedland, Dayse Távora-Vieira
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electrically evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials (ECAEPs) are central brain responses to auditory stimuli that correlate with postoperative cochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes. They differ from electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) which are peripheral responses that can be elicited intraoperatively and may also predict CI hearing outcomes. It is not known to what degree ECAP and ECAEP responses are associated with each other. Such a correlation, if present, may allow for an earlier and more accurate prediction of postoperative hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 42 adult CI users. Threshold levels and amplitude growth function slopes of intraoperative ECAPs were compared to the latencies and peak-to-peak amplitudes of postoperative ECAEP responses at three different cochlear electrode array sites (apical, medial, and basal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A weak positive relationship was found between intraoperative ECAP thresholds and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.301, p = 0.005). Time between ECAP and ECAEP measurements was weakly correlated with P1-N1 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.321, p = 0.002) and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.340, p = 0.001). ECAP amplitude growth function slopes varied by electrode location (χ2 = 26.701, df = 2, p = 0. 000002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that intraoperative ECAP responses do not robustly predict postoperative ECAEP responses, providing caution against the use of ECAPs as a predictive tool for CI hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electrically evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials (ECAEPs) are central brain responses to auditory stimuli that correlate with postoperative cochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes. They differ from electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) which are peripheral responses that can be elicited intraoperatively and may also predict CI hearing outcomes. It is not known to what degree ECAP and ECAEP responses are associated with each other. Such a correlation, if present, may allow for an earlier and more accurate prediction of postoperative hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 42 adult CI users. Threshold levels and amplitude growth function slopes of intraoperative ECAPs were compared to the latencies and peak-to-peak amplitudes of postoperative ECAEP responses at three different cochlear electrode array sites (apical, medial, and basal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A weak positive relationship was found between intraoperative ECAP thresholds and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.301, p = 0.005). Time between ECAP and ECAEP measurements was weakly correlated with P1-N1 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.321, p = 0.002) and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.340, p = 0.001). ECAP amplitude growth function slopes varied by el
目的:电诱发皮层听觉诱发电位(ECAEPs)是大脑对听觉刺激的中枢反应,与人工耳蜗(CI)术后听力结果相关。它们不同于电诱发复合动作电位(ECAP),后者是外周反应,可在术中诱发,也可预测 CI 的听力结果。目前还不清楚 ECAP 和 ECAEP 反应在多大程度上相互关联。如果存在这种关联,则可以更早、更准确地预测术后听力结果:这项回顾性研究涉及 42 名成年 CI 使用者。将术中 ECAP 的阈值水平和振幅增长函数斜率与三个不同耳蜗电极阵列位置(耳尖、内侧和基底)的术后 ECAEP 反应的潜伏期和峰峰值振幅进行比较:结果:术中ECAP阈值与ECAEP N1-P2峰峰值振幅之间存在微弱的正相关关系(r=0.301,p=0.005)。ECAP和ECAEP测量之间的时间与P1-N1峰峰值振幅(r=0.321,p=0.002)和ECAEP N1-P2峰峰值振幅(r=0.340,p=0.001)呈弱相关。ECAP振幅增长函数(AGF)斜率因电极位置而异(χ²=26.701,df = 2,p=0. 000002):这些结果表明,术中 ECAP 反应不能有力地预测术后 ECAEP 反应,因此在使用 ECAP 作为 CI 听力结果的预测工具时应谨慎。
{"title":"Intraoperative Compound Action Potentials as a Predictor of Postoperative Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.","authors":"Alexander Stutley, Caris Bogdanov, Marcus Windsor Rao Voola, Peter Friedland, Dayse Távora-Vieira","doi":"10.1159/000540576","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000540576","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electrically evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials (ECAEPs) are central brain responses to auditory stimuli that correlate with postoperative cochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes. They differ from electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) which are peripheral responses that can be elicited intraoperatively and may also predict CI hearing outcomes. It is not known to what degree ECAP and ECAEP responses are associated with each other. Such a correlation, if present, may allow for an earlier and more accurate prediction of postoperative hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 42 adult CI users. Threshold levels and amplitude growth function slopes of intraoperative ECAPs were compared to the latencies and peak-to-peak amplitudes of postoperative ECAEP responses at three different cochlear electrode array sites (apical, medial, and basal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A weak positive relationship was found between intraoperative ECAP thresholds and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.301, p = 0.005). Time between ECAP and ECAEP measurements was weakly correlated with P1-N1 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.321, p = 0.002) and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.340, p = 0.001). ECAP amplitude growth function slopes varied by electrode location (χ2 = 26.701, df = 2, p = 0. 000002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that intraoperative ECAP responses do not robustly predict postoperative ECAEP responses, providing caution against the use of ECAPs as a predictive tool for CI hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electrically evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials (ECAEPs) are central brain responses to auditory stimuli that correlate with postoperative cochlear implant (CI) hearing outcomes. They differ from electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) which are peripheral responses that can be elicited intraoperatively and may also predict CI hearing outcomes. It is not known to what degree ECAP and ECAEP responses are associated with each other. Such a correlation, if present, may allow for an earlier and more accurate prediction of postoperative hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 42 adult CI users. Threshold levels and amplitude growth function slopes of intraoperative ECAPs were compared to the latencies and peak-to-peak amplitudes of postoperative ECAEP responses at three different cochlear electrode array sites (apical, medial, and basal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A weak positive relationship was found between intraoperative ECAP thresholds and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.301, p = 0.005). Time between ECAP and ECAEP measurements was weakly correlated with P1-N1 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.321, p = 0.002) and ECAEP N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude (r = 0.340, p = 0.001). ECAP amplitude growth function slopes varied by el","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"58-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-10DOI: 10.1159/000542361
Matthew McCall, Janitha Jayawardana, Jill Mustard, Joanne Lake, John Pearson, Philip Bird
Introduction: Research suggests deaf children who receive cochlear implants (CIs) at an early age can achieve age-appropriate language. Recent studies suggest age at full-time CI use is a better predictor of language outcomes than age at implant. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are correlations between age at implantation, establishing consistent device use, and language outcomes in a cohort of young children in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted. The study included 46 participants, implanted by the Southern Cochlear Implant Programme by age 18 months. The median age at implant was 8 months. Device use was measured via data logging. Consistent device use was defined as ≥8 h per day. Language outcomes were measured at 2- and 3-year post-implantation using PLS-5.
Results: Consistent use was established by 78.3% by 3 years. Language results were at least one SD higher for children who achieved consistent use within 2 years of implant. Language scores for Maori children were more than one SD lower than non-Maori, a finding not entirely explained by less usage. There was no correlation between age of implantation and length of time to consistent device use. The presence of additional disabilities affected consistent device use.
Conclusion: Simply offering CIs earlier is not sufficient to improve language outcomes in the congenitally deaf population. Earlier consistent use was associated with better language outcomes for those implanted before 18 months of age, and language scores were higher for children who achieved consistent use within 2 years of implantation. There is a need to understand why children with pre-lingual deafness may not be achieving consistent device use, and by doing so, we would be a step closer to being able to tailor culturally appropriate supports and services that could help more children achieve better outcomes.
{"title":"The Correlation between Age at Implant, Consistent Device Use, and Language Outcomes for Children Implanted under 18 Months.","authors":"Matthew McCall, Janitha Jayawardana, Jill Mustard, Joanne Lake, John Pearson, Philip Bird","doi":"10.1159/000542361","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research suggests deaf children who receive cochlear implants (CIs) at an early age can achieve age-appropriate language. Recent studies suggest age at full-time CI use is a better predictor of language outcomes than age at implant. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are correlations between age at implantation, establishing consistent device use, and language outcomes in a cohort of young children in Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted. The study included 46 participants, implanted by the Southern Cochlear Implant Programme by age 18 months. The median age at implant was 8 months. Device use was measured via data logging. Consistent device use was defined as ≥8 h per day. Language outcomes were measured at 2- and 3-year post-implantation using PLS-5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent use was established by 78.3% by 3 years. Language results were at least one SD higher for children who achieved consistent use within 2 years of implant. Language scores for Maori children were more than one SD lower than non-Maori, a finding not entirely explained by less usage. There was no correlation between age of implantation and length of time to consistent device use. The presence of additional disabilities affected consistent device use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simply offering CIs earlier is not sufficient to improve language outcomes in the congenitally deaf population. Earlier consistent use was associated with better language outcomes for those implanted before 18 months of age, and language scores were higher for children who achieved consistent use within 2 years of implantation. There is a need to understand why children with pre-lingual deafness may not be achieving consistent device use, and by doing so, we would be a step closer to being able to tailor culturally appropriate supports and services that could help more children achieve better outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"197-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142808383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1159/000543211
Hye Yeon Ko, Min Hee Kim
Introduction: To date, no study has reported the various otologic conditions associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using population-based design. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk of audio-vestibular disorders (benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, Meniere's disease, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus) increasing after COVID-19 infection.
Methods: This retrospective population-based study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS)-COVID-19 cohort database of South Korea. We identified participants in the COVID-19 group using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests. A matched cohort without COVID-19 was randomly selected in a 1:1 ratio. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, Meniere's disease, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus were defined using diagnostic, medication, and procedure codes. The incidence and risk of these disorders were assessed in both groups using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses.
Results: In total, 4,976,589 COVID-19 patients and an equivalent number of matched non-infected controls were analyzed. COVID-19 patients faced an increased risk of developing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus compared to controls in univariate and multivariate Cox hazard analyses. COVID patients were at an increased risk of Meniere's disease in the univariate analysis; however, the risk of Meniere's disease after COVID-19 did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: COVID-19 infection may increase the risk of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus.
{"title":"A Nationwide Population-Based Study for Audio-Vestibular Disorders following COVID-19 Infection.","authors":"Hye Yeon Ko, Min Hee Kim","doi":"10.1159/000543211","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000543211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To date, no study has reported the various otologic conditions associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using population-based design. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk of audio-vestibular disorders (benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, Meniere's disease, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus) increasing after COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective population-based study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS)-COVID-19 cohort database of South Korea. We identified participants in the COVID-19 group using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests. A matched cohort without COVID-19 was randomly selected in a 1:1 ratio. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, Meniere's disease, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus were defined using diagnostic, medication, and procedure codes. The incidence and risk of these disorders were assessed in both groups using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4,976,589 COVID-19 patients and an equivalent number of matched non-infected controls were analyzed. COVID-19 patients faced an increased risk of developing benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus compared to controls in univariate and multivariate Cox hazard analyses. COVID patients were at an increased risk of Meniere's disease in the univariate analysis; however, the risk of Meniere's disease after COVID-19 did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>COVID-19 infection may increase the risk of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, vestibular neuritis, and tinnitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"245-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142904072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1159/000544719
Büşra Sezer, Mine Baydan Aran, Mine Baydan
Introduction: Performing two tasks simultaneously may present various challenges for the human cognitive system. This study investigates how concurrent cognitive tasks impact the performance of the functional head impulse test (fHIT) in healthy adults. It was hypothesized that adding a cognitive load during fHIT would reduce the test's scores due to shared attentional resources.
Method: Twenty-seven participants completed the functional head impulse test (fHIT) and verbal fluency tests simultaneously. The study was designed in three stages: (1) recording fHIT results without any cognitive task, (2) completing the categorical fluency test and fHIT concurrently, and (3) administering the phonemic fluency test and fHIT simultaneously, with results recorded.
Results: Significant differences were observed in fHIT performance with and without additional cognitive tasks. Categorical tasks (e.g., animal and furniture categories) and phonemic tasks (e.g., words starting with "K," "A," or "S") impacted fHIT results, with notable performance reductions.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that dual-task scenarios involving cognitive and vestibular demands adversely affect fHIT performance. The findings underscore the importance of attentional capacity in tasks requiring simultaneous cognitive and visual-oculomotor processing. These insights could guide future clinical applications in assessing and rehabilitating vestibular and cognitive deficits.
{"title":"Investigation of the Effect of Cognitive Additional Tasks on Functional Head Impulse Test in Healthy Individuals.","authors":"Büşra Sezer, Mine Baydan Aran, Mine Baydan","doi":"10.1159/000544719","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000544719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Performing two tasks simultaneously may present various challenges for the human cognitive system. This study investigates how concurrent cognitive tasks impact the performance of the functional head impulse test (fHIT) in healthy adults. It was hypothesized that adding a cognitive load during fHIT would reduce the test's scores due to shared attentional resources.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven participants completed the functional head impulse test (fHIT) and verbal fluency tests simultaneously. The study was designed in three stages: (1) recording fHIT results without any cognitive task, (2) completing the categorical fluency test and fHIT concurrently, and (3) administering the phonemic fluency test and fHIT simultaneously, with results recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in fHIT performance with and without additional cognitive tasks. Categorical tasks (e.g., animal and furniture categories) and phonemic tasks (e.g., words starting with \"K,\" \"A,\" or \"S\") impacted fHIT results, with notable performance reductions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that dual-task scenarios involving cognitive and vestibular demands adversely affect fHIT performance. The findings underscore the importance of attentional capacity in tasks requiring simultaneous cognitive and visual-oculomotor processing. These insights could guide future clinical applications in assessing and rehabilitating vestibular and cognitive deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"321-326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143588239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-07-10DOI: 10.1159/000547204
Hüseyin Deniz
Introduction: Bilateral cochlear implantation can be performed simultaneously or sequentially based on hearing loss and patient age, though global consensus on sequential implantation remains unresolved.
Methods: Data of 27 individuals from this patient group were included in this study. The mean chronological age of the 27 individuals included in the study was 140.93 ± 41.51 months. The mean chronological age of the participants was 25.44 ± 9.25 months at the time of early unilateral cochlear implantation (CI 1). The implantation delay of late sequential cochlear implantation (CI 2) was 115.48 ± 41.45 months. Cortical auditory evoked potential P1 latency measurements were performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The change in performance over time was analyzed based on measurements at five different time points for CI 2.
Results: There were substantial improvements in auditory perception and performance 3 months after CI 2 activation. CAEP analyses were indicative of improvements in cortical responses and positive effects of CI 2 on central auditory system plasticity. These results suggested that late second implantation might be associated with improved auditory outcomes. These improved from CAEP test P1 latency were statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Late CI 2 can significantly improve auditory perception and promote adaptive plasticity in individuals with prior unilateral cochlear implants. These results suggest that even late consecutive cochlear implantations may provide clinical benefit.
{"title":"Auditory Performance and Cortical Plasticity following Late Sequential Cochlear Implantation.","authors":"Hüseyin Deniz","doi":"10.1159/000547204","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000547204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bilateral cochlear implantation can be performed simultaneously or sequentially based on hearing loss and patient age, though global consensus on sequential implantation remains unresolved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 27 individuals from this patient group were included in this study. The mean chronological age of the 27 individuals included in the study was 140.93 ± 41.51 months. The mean chronological age of the participants was 25.44 ± 9.25 months at the time of early unilateral cochlear implantation (CI 1). The implantation delay of late sequential cochlear implantation (CI 2) was 115.48 ± 41.45 months. Cortical auditory evoked potential P1 latency measurements were performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The change in performance over time was analyzed based on measurements at five different time points for CI 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were substantial improvements in auditory perception and performance 3 months after CI 2 activation. CAEP analyses were indicative of improvements in cortical responses and positive effects of CI 2 on central auditory system plasticity. These results suggested that late second implantation might be associated with improved auditory outcomes. These improved from CAEP test P1 latency were statistically significant (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Late CI 2 can significantly improve auditory perception and promote adaptive plasticity in individuals with prior unilateral cochlear implants. These results suggest that even late consecutive cochlear implantations may provide clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"526-534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144610409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-10-11DOI: 10.1159/000533684
Assan Mary Cedras, Karina Moin-Darbari, Kim Foisy, Sylvie Auger, Don Nguyen, François Champoux, Maxime Maheu
Introduction: Mal de debarquement syndrome (MdDS) is a rare and poorly understood clinical entity defined as a persistent sensation of rocking and swaying that can severely affect the quality of life. To date, the treatment options are very limited. Even though vestibular rehabilitation (VR) efficacy following peripheral vestibular lesion is well-documented, little is known about its influence on MdDS. The objective of the study was to explore the influence of traditional VR program on postural control in a patient diagnosed with MdDS.
Methods: We assessed 3 different participants: 1 healthy control; 1 participant with identified peripheral vestibular impairment (VI); 1 participant diagnosed with MdDS. Postural control was assessed using a force plate (AMTI, Accusway). Participants were assessed following the modified Clinical Test Sensory Integration Balance protocol (mCTSIB, eyes open on firm surface/eyes closed on firm surface/eyes open on foam/eyes closed on foam). The raw data were exported and analyzed in a custom-made Matlab script (Matlab R2020a). We retrieved the center of pressure velocity in both anterior-posterior and mediolateral directions and performed an analysis of the frequency content using Daubechies wavelet of order 4 with 6 levels of decomposition. Protocol VI and MdDS patients performed a 4-week VR program. Postural control, using a force plate, and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) were assessed before and after the VR program. Healthy control was assessed twice separated by 1 week without any specific intervention.
Results: VI participant showed clear improvement on DHI and sway velocity on condition eyes closed with foam. Accordingly, a reduction of energy content within frequency bands (0.39-0.78 Hz and 0.78-1.56 Hz) was observed post-rehabilitation for VI participant in both conditions with foam. Interestingly, MdDS participant demonstrated a reduction in sway velocity in most of the conditions but the frequency content was not modified by VR and was comparable to healthy control. Accordingly, the DHI of the MdDS participant failed to demonstrate any difference following VR.
Conclusion: The results of the present study question the use of VR as an efficient treatment option for MdDS. Future studies must recruit a larger sample size and focus on the relationship between illusion of movement and postural characteristics such as sway velocity.
引言:Mal de debarquement综合征(MdDS)是一种罕见且鲜为人知的临床实体,其定义为持续的摇摆感,会严重影响生活质量。迄今为止,治疗选择非常有限。尽管外周前庭损伤后的前庭康复(VR)疗效已得到充分证明,但对其对MdDS的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨传统VR程序对诊断为MdDS患者姿势控制的影响。方法:我们评估了3名不同的参与者:1名健康对照;1名被试患有外周前庭损伤(VI);1名参与者被诊断为MdDS。使用力板(AMTI,Accusway)评估姿势控制。根据改良的临床测试感觉统合平衡方案(mCTSIB,眼睛在坚硬表面睁开/眼睛在坚硬的表面闭上/眼睛在泡沫上睁开/眼睛闭上泡沫)对参与者进行评估。在定制的Matlab脚本(Matlab R2020a)中导出并分析原始数据。我们检索了前后方向和内侧方向上的压力速度中心,并使用具有6个分解级别的4阶Daubechies小波对频率内容进行了分析。方案VI和MdDS患者进行了为期4周的VR项目。在VR项目前后评估姿势控制、力量板和眩晕障碍量表(DHI)。在没有任何具体干预的情况下,对健康对照组进行两次评估,间隔1周。结果:VI参与者在泡沫闭眼的情况下,DHI和摆动速度有明显改善。因此,在使用泡沫的两种情况下,VI参与者在康复后观察到频带(0.39-0.78Hz和0.78-1.56Hz)内的能量含量降低。有趣的是,MdDS参与者在大多数情况下都表现出摇摆速度的降低,但VR没有改变频率内容,与健康对照组相当。因此,MdDS参与者的DHI在VR后没有表现出任何差异。结论:本研究的结果对VR作为MdDS的有效治疗选择的使用提出了质疑。未来的研究必须招募更大的样本量,并关注运动错觉与摇摆速度等姿势特征之间的关系。
{"title":"Questioning the Impact of Vestibular Rehabilitation in Mal de Debarquement Syndrome.","authors":"Assan Mary Cedras, Karina Moin-Darbari, Kim Foisy, Sylvie Auger, Don Nguyen, François Champoux, Maxime Maheu","doi":"10.1159/000533684","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000533684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mal de debarquement syndrome (MdDS) is a rare and poorly understood clinical entity defined as a persistent sensation of rocking and swaying that can severely affect the quality of life. To date, the treatment options are very limited. Even though vestibular rehabilitation (VR) efficacy following peripheral vestibular lesion is well-documented, little is known about its influence on MdDS. The objective of the study was to explore the influence of traditional VR program on postural control in a patient diagnosed with MdDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 3 different participants: 1 healthy control; 1 participant with identified peripheral vestibular impairment (VI); 1 participant diagnosed with MdDS. Postural control was assessed using a force plate (AMTI, Accusway). Participants were assessed following the modified Clinical Test Sensory Integration Balance protocol (mCTSIB, eyes open on firm surface/eyes closed on firm surface/eyes open on foam/eyes closed on foam). The raw data were exported and analyzed in a custom-made Matlab script (Matlab R2020a). We retrieved the center of pressure velocity in both anterior-posterior and mediolateral directions and performed an analysis of the frequency content using Daubechies wavelet of order 4 with 6 levels of decomposition. Protocol VI and MdDS patients performed a 4-week VR program. Postural control, using a force plate, and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) were assessed before and after the VR program. Healthy control was assessed twice separated by 1 week without any specific intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VI participant showed clear improvement on DHI and sway velocity on condition eyes closed with foam. Accordingly, a reduction of energy content within frequency bands (0.39-0.78 Hz and 0.78-1.56 Hz) was observed post-rehabilitation for VI participant in both conditions with foam. Interestingly, MdDS participant demonstrated a reduction in sway velocity in most of the conditions but the frequency content was not modified by VR and was comparable to healthy control. Accordingly, the DHI of the MdDS participant failed to demonstrate any difference following VR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the present study question the use of VR as an efficient treatment option for MdDS. Future studies must recruit a larger sample size and focus on the relationship between illusion of movement and postural characteristics such as sway velocity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41220900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}