Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-08-11DOI: 10.1159/000531545
Maarten C Uijttewaal, Roeland B van Leeuwen, Carla Colijn, Tjard R Schermer
Introduction: Benign recurrent vertigo (BRV), Menière's disease (MD), and vestibular migraine (VM) show many similarities with regard to the course of vertigo attacks and clinical features. In this paper, we elaborate on the decreasing frequency of vertigo attacks observed in a previous study from our group by exploring changes in the duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in patients with BRV, MD, or VM.
Methods: For this 3-year prospective cohort study in our tertiary referral center we recruited patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BRV, MD, or VM by a neurologist and otorhinolaryngologist in our center in 2015-2016. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess the usual duration of vertigo attacks and their potential triggers every 6 months. Main outcome measures were changes in duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in the subgroups of patients with persisting attacks, which were analyzed using repeated measures logistic regression models.
Results: 121 patients were included (BRV: n = 44; MD: n = 43; VM: n = 34) of whom 117 completed the 3-year follow-up period and 57 (48.7%) kept reporting vertigo attacks at one more follow-up measurements. None of the diagnosis groups showed statistically significant shortening of attack duration at the subsequent annual follow-up measurements compared to baseline. At baseline, stress and fatigue being reported as triggers for attacks differed significantly between the three groups (stress: BRV 40.9%, MD 62.8%, VM 76.5%, p = 0.005; fatigue: BRV 31.0%, MD 48.8%, VM 68.8%, p = 0.003). In the VM group, a consistent reduction of stress and fatigue as triggers was observed up until the 24- and the 30-month follow-up measurements, respectively, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 0.15 to 0.33 (all p < 0.05). In the MD group, a consistent reduction of head movements as trigger was observed from the 24-month measurement onward (ORs ranging from 0.07 to 0.11, all p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Our study showed no reduction in vertigo attack duration over time in patients with BRV, MD, and VM who remain to have vertigo attacks. In VM and MD patients with persisting vertigo attacks stress, fatigue and head movements became less predominant triggers for vertigo attacks.
{"title":"Course of Duration and Trigger Factors of Vertigo Attacks in Patients with Benign Recurrent Vertigo, Menière's Disease, or Vestibular Migraine.","authors":"Maarten C Uijttewaal, Roeland B van Leeuwen, Carla Colijn, Tjard R Schermer","doi":"10.1159/000531545","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000531545","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Benign recurrent vertigo (BRV), Menière's disease (MD), and vestibular migraine (VM) show many similarities with regard to the course of vertigo attacks and clinical features. In this paper, we elaborate on the decreasing frequency of vertigo attacks observed in a previous study from our group by exploring changes in the duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in patients with BRV, MD, or VM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this 3-year prospective cohort study in our tertiary referral center we recruited patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BRV, MD, or VM by a neurologist and otorhinolaryngologist in our center in 2015-2016. A study-specific questionnaire was used to assess the usual duration of vertigo attacks and their potential triggers every 6 months. Main outcome measures were changes in duration and trigger factors of vertigo attacks in the subgroups of patients with persisting attacks, which were analyzed using repeated measures logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>121 patients were included (BRV: n = 44; MD: n = 43; VM: n = 34) of whom 117 completed the 3-year follow-up period and 57 (48.7%) kept reporting vertigo attacks at one more follow-up measurements. None of the diagnosis groups showed statistically significant shortening of attack duration at the subsequent annual follow-up measurements compared to baseline. At baseline, stress and fatigue being reported as triggers for attacks differed significantly between the three groups (stress: BRV 40.9%, MD 62.8%, VM 76.5%, p = 0.005; fatigue: BRV 31.0%, MD 48.8%, VM 68.8%, p = 0.003). In the VM group, a consistent reduction of stress and fatigue as triggers was observed up until the 24- and the 30-month follow-up measurements, respectively, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 0.15 to 0.33 (all p < 0.05). In the MD group, a consistent reduction of head movements as trigger was observed from the 24-month measurement onward (ORs ranging from 0.07 to 0.11, all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed no reduction in vertigo attack duration over time in patients with BRV, MD, and VM who remain to have vertigo attacks. In VM and MD patients with persisting vertigo attacks stress, fatigue and head movements became less predominant triggers for vertigo attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"49-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836642/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9980967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-08-09DOI: 10.1159/000530686
Fieke K Oussoren, Tjard R Schermer, Roeland B van Leeuwen, Tjasse D Bruintjes
Vascular involvement in the pathophysiology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (iSSNHL) has been previously proposed. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature and conduct meta-analyses to evaluate associations between cardiovascular risk factors, cerebral small vessel disease, and subsequent stroke after presentation with iSSNHL. Three systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. All studies investigating associations between iSSNHL and the cardiovascular risk factors: body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, medical history of myocardial infarction (MI), smoking, the degree of white matter hyperintensities, and incidence of stroke were included. Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, two independent reviewers reviewed the articles and assessed risk of bias. The cardiovascular risk factors of abnormal BMI, diabetes, hypertension, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a medical history of MI were significantly associated with iSSNHL. The adjusted hazard ratio of a higher degree of white matter hyperintensities was 0.70 (95% CI 0.44, 1.12). Patients with iSSNHL showed a higher risk of stroke compared to controls, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.22 up to 4.08. Several cardiovascular risk factors are more frequently present in patients with iSSNHL than in the general population. The degree of white matter hyperintensities does not appear to be increased in patients with iSSNHL, while the risk of stroke following ISSNHL is increased. Prospective studies with larger study populations are needed to confirm the associations between generalized cardiovascular disease and iSSNHL and to assess whether these patients benefit from cardiovascular risk management to prevent future cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.
{"title":"Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Cerebral Small Vessel Disease, and Subsequent Risk of Stroke in Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of the Current Literature.","authors":"Fieke K Oussoren, Tjard R Schermer, Roeland B van Leeuwen, Tjasse D Bruintjes","doi":"10.1159/000530686","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000530686","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vascular involvement in the pathophysiology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (iSSNHL) has been previously proposed. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature and conduct meta-analyses to evaluate associations between cardiovascular risk factors, cerebral small vessel disease, and subsequent stroke after presentation with iSSNHL. Three systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. All studies investigating associations between iSSNHL and the cardiovascular risk factors: body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, medical history of myocardial infarction (MI), smoking, the degree of white matter hyperintensities, and incidence of stroke were included. Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, two independent reviewers reviewed the articles and assessed risk of bias. The cardiovascular risk factors of abnormal BMI, diabetes, hypertension, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a medical history of MI were significantly associated with iSSNHL. The adjusted hazard ratio of a higher degree of white matter hyperintensities was 0.70 (95% CI 0.44, 1.12). Patients with iSSNHL showed a higher risk of stroke compared to controls, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.22 up to 4.08. Several cardiovascular risk factors are more frequently present in patients with iSSNHL than in the general population. The degree of white matter hyperintensities does not appear to be increased in patients with iSSNHL, while the risk of stroke following ISSNHL is increased. Prospective studies with larger study populations are needed to confirm the associations between generalized cardiovascular disease and iSSNHL and to assess whether these patients benefit from cardiovascular risk management to prevent future cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836643/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10020471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-06DOI: 10.1159/000536531
Janaina Patricio de Lima, Raquel Manrique-Huarte, Sol Ferran, Francisca Mallmann, Diego Calavia Gil, Belén Andueza Barrenechea, Alicia Huarte, Maria Antonia Gallego Madrid, Manuel Manrique
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Active aging emphasizes optimizing health and participation for a better quality of life as people age. This paper explores the significant impact of hearing loss and balance disorders on the elderly. Age-related hearing loss is thought to contribute to communication breakdown and cognitive dysfunctions. The "hearing and balance in healthy aging" project focuses on early detection, mitigation, and advocacy. Objectives include exploring epidemiological traits, evaluating overall well-being impact, proving positive intervention effects, and advocating societal care for the elderly with hearing loss and balance disorders, aiming to reduce their broader impact on cognition, independence, and sociability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is observational, prospective study. Subjects over 55 years old with a follow-up every year or every 2 years were divided into three groups, according to their hearing and balance: within the normal range (group A), detected and not treated (group B), and detected and treated (group C). At each visit, they underwent a series of tests or questionnaires, evaluating different areas: hearing, balance, cognition, depression, dependence, tinnitus, loneliness, health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 710 patients were included in the study. The distribution of patients was as follows: group A - 210 patients, group B - 302 patients, and group C - 198 patients. Significant differences were found between the three groups related to age, sex, educational level, bilingualism, and work activity. In group C, there was a higher percentage of males, older than in groups A and B, and the percentage of individuals with a university education was lower (28%), as was the rate of bilingualism (23%). In terms of hearing, significant differences were found in the three groups in the mean PTA, speech discrimination in quiet, and the HINT test, with worse results for group C. Only patients in group C presented a perception of hearing impairment, and the handicap caused by hearing impairment worsened from group A to C. Concerning balance, both tests performed (TuGT and DHI) revealed increased difficulty in maintaining autonomous walking from group A to C, which, again, exhibited the worst results, with statistically significant differences across the group. Analysis about cognition revealed significant differences in DSST questionnaires and in TMT scores, where group C had the worst scores. In HUI3 questionnaire scores, the differences between each and every group were statistically significant, with group C showing moderate disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This extensive analysis, encompassing a considerable number of subjects, reveals significant findings that have important implications for the early prevention of hearing loss and its consequent consequences. At the same time, these data represent an initial exploration, which raises the need for in-depth examinations of ad
导言:积极老龄化强调优化健康和参与,以提高老年人的生活质量。本文探讨了听力损失和平衡失调对老年人的重大影响。与年龄相关的听力损失被认为会导致沟通障碍和认知功能障碍。健康老龄化中的听力和平衡 "项目侧重于早期检测、缓解和宣传。目标包括探索流行病学特征,评估对整体健康的影响,证明积极的干预效果,倡导社会关爱听力损失和平衡失调的老年人,以减少其对认知、独立性和社交能力的广泛影响:本研究为前瞻性观察研究。研究对象年龄在 55 岁以上,每年或每两年随访一次,根据他们的听力和平衡能力分为三组:在正常范围内(A 组)、已发现但未接受治疗(B 组)和已发现并接受治疗(C 组)。每次就诊时,他们都要接受一系列测试或问卷调查,对听力、平衡、认知、抑郁、依赖、耳鸣、孤独、健康等不同方面进行评估:共有 710 名患者参与了研究。患者分布情况如下:A 组 210 人,B 组 302 人,C 组 198 人。三组患者在年龄、性别、教育程度、双语能力和工作活动方面存在显著差异。与 A 组和 B 组相比,C 组的男性比例更高,年龄更大,受过大学教育的比例更低(28%),会说两种语言的比例也更低(23%)。在听力方面,三组患者在平均 PTA、安静时的语言辨别力和 HINT 测试中均存在显著差异,其中 C 组的结果更差。关于平衡能力,所做的两项测试(TuGT 和 DHI)均显示,从 A 组到 C 组,患者在保持自主行走方面的难度增加,而 C 组的结果最差,各组之间存在显著的统计学差异。对认知能力的分析表明,DSST 问卷和 TMT 分数存在显著差异,其中 C 组的分数最差。在 HUI3 问卷得分方面,各组之间的差异均有统计学意义,C 组显示出中度残疾:这项广泛的分析涵盖了相当多的受试者,揭示了对早期预防听力损失及其后果具有重要意义的重大发现。同时,这些数据只是初步探索,还需要对更多因素进行深入研究,并进行更长时间的随访,以继续为健康老龄化提供见解和知识。
{"title":"Hearing and Balance in Healthy Aging Project: Characterization of Hearing, Balance, and Other Associated Disorders in Three Population Groups Aged 55 and Over.","authors":"Janaina Patricio de Lima, Raquel Manrique-Huarte, Sol Ferran, Francisca Mallmann, Diego Calavia Gil, Belén Andueza Barrenechea, Alicia Huarte, Maria Antonia Gallego Madrid, Manuel Manrique","doi":"10.1159/000536531","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000536531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Active aging emphasizes optimizing health and participation for a better quality of life as people age. This paper explores the significant impact of hearing loss and balance disorders on the elderly. Age-related hearing loss is thought to contribute to communication breakdown and cognitive dysfunctions. The \"hearing and balance in healthy aging\" project focuses on early detection, mitigation, and advocacy. Objectives include exploring epidemiological traits, evaluating overall well-being impact, proving positive intervention effects, and advocating societal care for the elderly with hearing loss and balance disorders, aiming to reduce their broader impact on cognition, independence, and sociability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is observational, prospective study. Subjects over 55 years old with a follow-up every year or every 2 years were divided into three groups, according to their hearing and balance: within the normal range (group A), detected and not treated (group B), and detected and treated (group C). At each visit, they underwent a series of tests or questionnaires, evaluating different areas: hearing, balance, cognition, depression, dependence, tinnitus, loneliness, health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 710 patients were included in the study. The distribution of patients was as follows: group A - 210 patients, group B - 302 patients, and group C - 198 patients. Significant differences were found between the three groups related to age, sex, educational level, bilingualism, and work activity. In group C, there was a higher percentage of males, older than in groups A and B, and the percentage of individuals with a university education was lower (28%), as was the rate of bilingualism (23%). In terms of hearing, significant differences were found in the three groups in the mean PTA, speech discrimination in quiet, and the HINT test, with worse results for group C. Only patients in group C presented a perception of hearing impairment, and the handicap caused by hearing impairment worsened from group A to C. Concerning balance, both tests performed (TuGT and DHI) revealed increased difficulty in maintaining autonomous walking from group A to C, which, again, exhibited the worst results, with statistically significant differences across the group. Analysis about cognition revealed significant differences in DSST questionnaires and in TMT scores, where group C had the worst scores. In HUI3 questionnaire scores, the differences between each and every group were statistically significant, with group C showing moderate disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This extensive analysis, encompassing a considerable number of subjects, reveals significant findings that have important implications for the early prevention of hearing loss and its consequent consequences. At the same time, these data represent an initial exploration, which raises the need for in-depth examinations of ad","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"306-321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309056/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-08DOI: 10.1159/000538254
Gi-Sung Nam, Seunghyun Han, Sung Il Cho
Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) using the video head impulse test (vHIT) as a vestibular function assessment method in patients with unilateral chronic otitis media (COM).
Methods: Twenty-eight patients with unilateral COM scheduled for middle ear surgery, including 12 males and 16 females with a mean age of 54.5 years, successfully underwent preoperative vHIT. vHIT variables, including VOR gain, VOR gain asymmetry, and the incidence of corrective saccades, were compared between the ipsilesional and contralesional ears.
Results: Ten (35.7%) patients reported varying degrees of disequilibrium or lightheadedness. The VOR gain in the ipsilesional and contralesional ears was 1.01 ± 0.10 and 1.04 ± 0.11, 0.97 ± 0.12 and 0.94 ± 0.13, and 0.97 ± 0.13 and 1.04 ± 0.15 in the horizontal canal (HC), anterior canal, and posterior canal (PC), respectively. The average VOR gains in the ipsilesional ears were within the predefined range of normal values; however, the gains in HC and PC significantly decreased compared with those in contralesional ears (p = 0.038 in HC and p = 0.015 in PC). The prevalence of corrective saccades, including overt and/or covert saccades, did not differ significantly between the two ears.
Conclusion: This study assessed the pathophysiology of the inner ear affected by chronic middle ear infection by quantitatively comparing the VOR using vHIT. It demonstrated that vHIT can be a practical assessment of vestibular function in patients with COM.
目的采用视频头脉冲试验(vHIT)评估单侧慢性中耳炎(COM)患者的前庭-眼反射(VOR),作为前庭功能评估方法:比较同侧耳和对侧耳的 VHIT 变量,包括 VOR 增益、VOR 增益不对称和纠正性囊回视的发生率:结果:10 名患者(35.7%)报告了不同程度的失衡或头晕。同侧耳和对侧耳的 VOR 增益分别为 1.01 ± 0.10 和 1.04 ± 0.11,0.97 ± 0.12 和 0.94 ± 0.13,水平耳道 (HC)、前耳道 (AC) 和后耳道 (PC) 的 VOR 增益分别为 0.97 ± 0.13 和 1.04 ± 0.15。同侧耳的平均 VOR 增益在预定的正常值范围内;但与对侧耳相比,HC 和 PC 的增益明显下降(HC 的 p=0.038 和 PC 的 p=0.015)。两只耳朵的矫正性囊视(包括明显囊视和/或隐蔽囊视)发生率没有明显差异:本研究通过使用 vHIT 对 VOR 进行定量比较,评估了受慢性中耳炎影响的内耳的病理生理学。该研究表明,vHIT 是评估 COM 患者前庭功能的实用方法。
{"title":"Evaluation of the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Using the Video Head Impulse Test in Patients with Unilateral Chronic Otitis Media.","authors":"Gi-Sung Nam, Seunghyun Han, Sung Il Cho","doi":"10.1159/000538254","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000538254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) using the video head impulse test (vHIT) as a vestibular function assessment method in patients with unilateral chronic otitis media (COM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients with unilateral COM scheduled for middle ear surgery, including 12 males and 16 females with a mean age of 54.5 years, successfully underwent preoperative vHIT. vHIT variables, including VOR gain, VOR gain asymmetry, and the incidence of corrective saccades, were compared between the ipsilesional and contralesional ears.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten (35.7%) patients reported varying degrees of disequilibrium or lightheadedness. The VOR gain in the ipsilesional and contralesional ears was 1.01 ± 0.10 and 1.04 ± 0.11, 0.97 ± 0.12 and 0.94 ± 0.13, and 0.97 ± 0.13 and 1.04 ± 0.15 in the horizontal canal (HC), anterior canal, and posterior canal (PC), respectively. The average VOR gains in the ipsilesional ears were within the predefined range of normal values; however, the gains in HC and PC significantly decreased compared with those in contralesional ears (p = 0.038 in HC and p = 0.015 in PC). The prevalence of corrective saccades, including overt and/or covert saccades, did not differ significantly between the two ears.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study assessed the pathophysiology of the inner ear affected by chronic middle ear infection by quantitatively comparing the VOR using vHIT. It demonstrated that vHIT can be a practical assessment of vestibular function in patients with COM.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"351-356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140061409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-02DOI: 10.1159/000534197
Marte Myhrum, Mariann Gjervik Heldahl, Arne Kirkhorn Rødvik, Ole Edvard Tvete, Greg Eigner Jablonski
Introduction: The main objective of the study was to validate the Norwegian translation of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and investigate the SSQ disability profiles in a cochlear implant (CI) user population.
Methods: The study involved 152 adult CI users. The mean age at implantation was 55 (standard deviation [SD] = 16), and the mean CI experience was 5 years (SD = 4.8). The cohort was split into three groups depending on the hearing modality: bilateral CIs (BCIs), a unilateral CI (UCI), and bimodal (CI plus contralateral hearing aid; HCI). The SSQ disability profiles of each group were compared with those observed in similar studies using the English version and other translations of the SSQ. Standard values, internal consistency, sensitivity, and floor and ceiling effects were investigated, and the missing-response rates to specific questions were calculated. Relationships to speech perception were measured using monosyllabic word scores and the Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test scores.
Results: In the BCI group, the average scores were around 5.0 for the speech and spatial sections and 7.0 for the qualities section (SD ∼2). The average scores of the UCI and HCI groups were about one point lower than those of the BCI group. The SSQ disability profiles were comparable to the profiles in similar studies. The slopes of the linear regression lines measuring the relationships between the SSQ speech and monosyllabic word scores were 0.8 per 10% increase in the monosyllabic word score for the BCI group (explaining 35% of the variation) and 0.4 for the UCI and HCI groups (explaining 22-23% of the variation).
Conclusion: The Norwegian version of the SSQ measures hearing disability similar to the original English version, and the internal consistency is good. Differences in the recipients' pre-implantation variables could explain some variations we observed in the SSQ responses, and such predictors should be investigated. Data aggregation will be possible using the SSQ as a routine clinical assessment in global CI populations. Moreover, pre-implantation variables should be systematically registered so that they can be used in mixed-effects models.
{"title":"Validation of the Norwegian Version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).","authors":"Marte Myhrum, Mariann Gjervik Heldahl, Arne Kirkhorn Rødvik, Ole Edvard Tvete, Greg Eigner Jablonski","doi":"10.1159/000534197","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000534197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The main objective of the study was to validate the Norwegian translation of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and investigate the SSQ disability profiles in a cochlear implant (CI) user population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 152 adult CI users. The mean age at implantation was 55 (standard deviation [SD] = 16), and the mean CI experience was 5 years (SD = 4.8). The cohort was split into three groups depending on the hearing modality: bilateral CIs (BCIs), a unilateral CI (UCI), and bimodal (CI plus contralateral hearing aid; HCI). The SSQ disability profiles of each group were compared with those observed in similar studies using the English version and other translations of the SSQ. Standard values, internal consistency, sensitivity, and floor and ceiling effects were investigated, and the missing-response rates to specific questions were calculated. Relationships to speech perception were measured using monosyllabic word scores and the Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the BCI group, the average scores were around 5.0 for the speech and spatial sections and 7.0 for the qualities section (SD ∼2). The average scores of the UCI and HCI groups were about one point lower than those of the BCI group. The SSQ disability profiles were comparable to the profiles in similar studies. The slopes of the linear regression lines measuring the relationships between the SSQ speech and monosyllabic word scores were 0.8 per 10% increase in the monosyllabic word score for the BCI group (explaining 35% of the variation) and 0.4 for the UCI and HCI groups (explaining 22-23% of the variation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Norwegian version of the SSQ measures hearing disability similar to the original English version, and the internal consistency is good. Differences in the recipients' pre-implantation variables could explain some variations we observed in the SSQ responses, and such predictors should be investigated. Data aggregation will be possible using the SSQ as a routine clinical assessment in global CI populations. Moreover, pre-implantation variables should be systematically registered so that they can be used in mixed-effects models.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"124-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10994583/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71429426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-06DOI: 10.1159/000536431
Nienke Cornelia Langerak, Hendrik Christiaan Stronks, Jeroen Johannes Briaire, Johan Hubertus Maria Frijns
Introduction: Cochlear implantation is the standard treatment for severe to profound hearing loss. While cochlear implant (CI) users can communicate effectively in quiet environments, speech understanding in noise remains challenging. Bimodal hearing, combining a CI in one ear and a hearing aid (HA) in the other, has shown advantages over unilateral electrical hearing, especially for speech understanding in noisy conditions. Beamforming is a technique used to improve speech understanding in noise by detecting sound direction and enhancing frontal (speech) sounds while attenuating background noise. One specific beamformer, Stereozoom, combines signals from microphones in both ears to create a focused beam toward the front resulting in a binaural beamformer (BB), in order to improve speech intelligibility in noise for bilateral and bimodal CI users.
Methods: A prospective crossover study involving 17 bimodal CI users was conducted, and participants were tested with various device configurations (CI, HA, CI + HA) with and without BB. Speech recognition testing with the Dutch/Flemish matrix test was performed in a sound-attenuated booth with diffuse noise to simulate realistic listening conditions.
Results: The results showed a statistically significant benefit of bimodal hearing over the CI configuration and showed a statistical significant benefit of BB for the CI and CI + HA configuration. The benefit of BB in the HA configuration was not statistically significant probably due to the higher variance. The benefit of BB in the three configurations did not differ statistically significant.
Conclusion: In conclusion, bimodal hearing offers advantages for speech understanding in noise for CI users. BB provides a benefit in various device configurations, leading to improved speech intelligibility when speech comes from the front in challenging listening environments.
简介人工耳蜗植入是治疗重度到极重度听力损失的标准方法。虽然人工耳蜗(CI)使用者可以在安静的环境中有效交流,但在噪音环境中理解语音仍然是一项挑战。双模听力,即一只耳朵植入人工耳蜗,另一只耳朵植入助听器(HA),与单侧电子听力相比具有优势,尤其是在噪音环境下的言语理解能力。波束成形是一种通过检测声音方向和增强正面(语音)声音同时减弱背景噪声来提高噪声中语音理解能力的技术。Stereozoom 是一种特殊的波束成形器,它将来自双耳麦克风的信号结合在一起,形成一个指向前方的聚焦波束,从而形成双耳波束成形器 (BB),以提高双侧和双模态人工耳蜗使用者在噪声中的语音清晰度:我们进行了一项前瞻性交叉研究,共有 17 名双模 CI 用户参加,并使用不同的设备配置(CI、HA、CI + HA)进行了有无 BB 的测试。使用荷兰语/瑕疵矩阵测试进行的语音识别测试是在具有漫反射噪声的隔音室中进行的,以模拟真实的听力条件:结果表明,与 CI 配置相比,双模态听力在统计学上有显著优势,而且在 CI 和 CI + HA 配置中,BB 在统计学上有显著优势。在 HA 配置中,BB 的优势在统计学上并不显著,这可能是由于方差较大。在三种配置中,BB 的益处在统计学上没有显著差异:总之,双模听力为 CI 用户在噪声中理解语音提供了优势。在不同的设备配置中,BB 都能带来益处,在具有挑战性的听力环境中,当语音来自前方时,BB 能提高语音清晰度。
{"title":"The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users.","authors":"Nienke Cornelia Langerak, Hendrik Christiaan Stronks, Jeroen Johannes Briaire, Johan Hubertus Maria Frijns","doi":"10.1159/000536431","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000536431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cochlear implantation is the standard treatment for severe to profound hearing loss. While cochlear implant (CI) users can communicate effectively in quiet environments, speech understanding in noise remains challenging. Bimodal hearing, combining a CI in one ear and a hearing aid (HA) in the other, has shown advantages over unilateral electrical hearing, especially for speech understanding in noisy conditions. Beamforming is a technique used to improve speech understanding in noise by detecting sound direction and enhancing frontal (speech) sounds while attenuating background noise. One specific beamformer, Stereozoom, combines signals from microphones in both ears to create a focused beam toward the front resulting in a binaural beamformer (BB), in order to improve speech intelligibility in noise for bilateral and bimodal CI users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective crossover study involving 17 bimodal CI users was conducted, and participants were tested with various device configurations (CI, HA, CI + HA) with and without BB. Speech recognition testing with the Dutch/Flemish matrix test was performed in a sound-attenuated booth with diffuse noise to simulate realistic listening conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed a statistically significant benefit of bimodal hearing over the CI configuration and showed a statistical significant benefit of BB for the CI and CI + HA configuration. The benefit of BB in the HA configuration was not statistically significant probably due to the higher variance. The benefit of BB in the three configurations did not differ statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, bimodal hearing offers advantages for speech understanding in noise for CI users. BB provides a benefit in various device configurations, leading to improved speech intelligibility when speech comes from the front in challenging listening environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"297-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309062/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140051128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-06DOI: 10.1159/000538983
W Wiktor Jedrzejczak, Krzysztof Kochanek
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three chatbots - OpenAI ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing Chat (currently Copilot), and Google Bard (currently Gemini) - in terms of their responses to a defined set of audiological questions.
Methods: Each chatbot was presented with the same 10 questions. The authors rated the responses on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Additional features, such as the number of inaccuracies or errors and the provision of references, were also examined.
Results: Most responses given by all three chatbots were rated as satisfactory or better. However, all chatbots generated at least a few errors or inaccuracies. ChatGPT achieved the highest overall score, while Bard was the worst. Bard was also the only chatbot unable to provide a response to one of the questions. ChatGPT was the only chatbot that did not provide information about its sources.
Conclusions: Chatbots are an intriguing tool that can be used to access basic information in a specialized area like audiology. Nevertheless, one needs to be careful, as correct information is not infrequently mixed in with errors that are hard to pick up unless the user is well versed in the field.
{"title":"Comparison of the Audiological Knowledge of Three Chatbots: ChatGPT, Bing Chat, and Bard.","authors":"W Wiktor Jedrzejczak, Krzysztof Kochanek","doi":"10.1159/000538983","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000538983","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate three chatbots - OpenAI ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing Chat (currently Copilot), and Google Bard (currently Gemini) - in terms of their responses to a defined set of audiological questions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each chatbot was presented with the same 10 questions. The authors rated the responses on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Additional features, such as the number of inaccuracies or errors and the provision of references, were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most responses given by all three chatbots were rated as satisfactory or better. However, all chatbots generated at least a few errors or inaccuracies. ChatGPT achieved the highest overall score, while Bard was the worst. Bard was also the only chatbot unable to provide a response to one of the questions. ChatGPT was the only chatbot that did not provide information about its sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chatbots are an intriguing tool that can be used to access basic information in a specialized area like audiology. Nevertheless, one needs to be careful, as correct information is not infrequently mixed in with errors that are hard to pick up unless the user is well versed in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"457-463"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140861630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The current pandemic of COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality primarily associated with respiratory failure. However, it has also been reported that COVID-19 can evolve into a nervous system infection. The direct and indirect mechanisms of damage associated with SARS-CoV-2 neuropathogenesis could affect our sensory functionality, including hearing and balance.
Summary: In order to investigate a possible association between SARS-CoV-2 viral infection and possible damage to the vestibular system, this review describes the main findings related to diagnosing and evaluating otoneurological pathologies.
Key messages: The clinical evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 causes acute damage to the vestibular system that would not leave significant sequelae. Recovery is similar to vestibular pathologies such as vestibular neuronitis and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Further basic science, clinical, and translational research is needed to verify and understand the short- and long-term effects of COVID-19 on vestibular function.
{"title":"COVID-19 and Vestibular Symptoms and Assessment: A Review.","authors":"Cristian Aedo-Sánchez, Gabriela Gutiérrez, Enzo Aguilar-Vidal","doi":"10.1159/000533448","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000533448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current pandemic of COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality primarily associated with respiratory failure. However, it has also been reported that COVID-19 can evolve into a nervous system infection. The direct and indirect mechanisms of damage associated with SARS-CoV-2 neuropathogenesis could affect our sensory functionality, including hearing and balance.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In order to investigate a possible association between SARS-CoV-2 viral infection and possible damage to the vestibular system, this review describes the main findings related to diagnosing and evaluating otoneurological pathologies.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The clinical evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 causes acute damage to the vestibular system that would not leave significant sequelae. Recovery is similar to vestibular pathologies such as vestibular neuronitis and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Further basic science, clinical, and translational research is needed to verify and understand the short- and long-term effects of COVID-19 on vestibular function.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10232815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-03-01DOI: 10.1159/000538128
Seung-Ho Shin, Sung Wan Byun, Ho Yun Lee
Introduction: We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of the loudness discomfort level (LDL) test in tinnitus patients and its relationship with pure-tone audiometry, tinnitogram, and questionnaires.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 320 tinnitus patients who visited a tertiary university hospital's tinnitus clinic and completed LDL tests between March 2020 and December 2022. Epidemiological data and psychoacoustic test results were collected.
Results: The LDL showed no significant differences between frequencies for both ears. The mean LDL did not correlate with mean pure-tone average or hearing thresholds at each frequency. The hearing loss group had a higher LDL at 8 kHz compared to the normal hearing group (p < 0.01). Objective sound intolerance was found in a quarter, correlating with subjective hyperacusis, anxiety, and depression. Weak negative correlations were found between most of questionnaire's scores and LDL on the left side. Tinnitus loudness weak negatively correlated with LDL at most frequencies, except 8 kHz.
Discussion/conclusion: Our findings suggest a notable association between LDL levels and emotional factors in tinnitus patients, rather than with auditory thresholds. While lateralized differences in LDL responses were observed, specifically on the left side, these preliminary results do not confirm a causal link and thus do not warrant changes to current clinical testing protocols without further research.
{"title":"Analysis of Loudness Discomfort Level Tests in Tinnitus Patients.","authors":"Seung-Ho Shin, Sung Wan Byun, Ho Yun Lee","doi":"10.1159/000538128","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000538128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of the loudness discomfort level (LDL) test in tinnitus patients and its relationship with pure-tone audiometry, tinnitogram, and questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 320 tinnitus patients who visited a tertiary university hospital's tinnitus clinic and completed LDL tests between March 2020 and December 2022. Epidemiological data and psychoacoustic test results were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LDL showed no significant differences between frequencies for both ears. The mean LDL did not correlate with mean pure-tone average or hearing thresholds at each frequency. The hearing loss group had a higher LDL at 8 kHz compared to the normal hearing group (p < 0.01). Objective sound intolerance was found in a quarter, correlating with subjective hyperacusis, anxiety, and depression. Weak negative correlations were found between most of questionnaire's scores and LDL on the left side. Tinnitus loudness weak negatively correlated with LDL at most frequencies, except 8 kHz.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a notable association between LDL levels and emotional factors in tinnitus patients, rather than with auditory thresholds. While lateralized differences in LDL responses were observed, specifically on the left side, these preliminary results do not confirm a causal link and thus do not warrant changes to current clinical testing protocols without further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1159/000534686
Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig, Sylvia Meuret, Rolf-Dieter Battmer, Michael Fuchs, Arneborg Ernst, Marc Schönwiesner
Introduction: Spatial hearing is most accurate using both ears, but accuracy decreases in persons with asymmetrical hearing between ears. In participants with deafness in one ear but normal hearing in the other ear (single-sided deafness [SSD]), this difference can be compensated by a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). It has been shown that a CI can restore sound localization performance, but it is still unclear to what extent auditory spatial discrimination can be improved.
Methods: The present study investigated auditory spatial discrimination using minimum audible angles (MAAs) in 18 CI-SSD participants. Results were compared to 120 age-matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) noise bursts were presented from 4°, 30°, and 60° azimuth on the CI side and on the NH side. MAA thresholds were tested for correlation with localization performance in the same participants.
Results: There were eight good performers and ten poor performers. There were more poor performers for LF signals than for HF signals. Performance on the CI side was comparable to performance on the NH side. Most difficulties occurred at 4° and at 30°. Eight of the good performers in the localization task were also good performers in the MAA task. Only the localization ability at 4° on the CI side was positively correlated with the MAA at that location.
Conclusion: Our data suggest that a CI can restore localization ability but not necessarily auditory spatial discrimination at the same time. The ability to discriminate between adjacent locations may be trainable during rehabilitation to enhance important auditory skills.
{"title":"Auditory Spatial Discrimination and Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided with a Cochlear Implant.","authors":"Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig, Sylvia Meuret, Rolf-Dieter Battmer, Michael Fuchs, Arneborg Ernst, Marc Schönwiesner","doi":"10.1159/000534686","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000534686","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spatial hearing is most accurate using both ears, but accuracy decreases in persons with asymmetrical hearing between ears. In participants with deafness in one ear but normal hearing in the other ear (single-sided deafness [SSD]), this difference can be compensated by a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). It has been shown that a CI can restore sound localization performance, but it is still unclear to what extent auditory spatial discrimination can be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study investigated auditory spatial discrimination using minimum audible angles (MAAs) in 18 CI-SSD participants. Results were compared to 120 age-matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) noise bursts were presented from 4°, 30°, and 60° azimuth on the CI side and on the NH side. MAA thresholds were tested for correlation with localization performance in the same participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were eight good performers and ten poor performers. There were more poor performers for LF signals than for HF signals. Performance on the CI side was comparable to performance on the NH side. Most difficulties occurred at 4° and at 30°. Eight of the good performers in the localization task were also good performers in the MAA task. Only the localization ability at 4° on the CI side was positively correlated with the MAA at that location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that a CI can restore localization ability but not necessarily auditory spatial discrimination at the same time. The ability to discriminate between adjacent locations may be trainable during rehabilitation to enhance important auditory skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"193-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152034/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138479359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}