Using cell phones by nurses can affect the quality of care. This study aimed to explore the consequences of using cell phones by nurses in hospitals. A qualitative approach was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Nursing staff, patients, and their relatives participated in this study. Categories of "emotionless care," "neglect in care," "impaired professional behavior" and a main theme of "Personal cell phone is a barrier to effective nursing care" extracted. Using cell phone during work could jeopardize patients' safety and ruins the nursing profession image. It is necessary to formulate guidelines on how to use cell phones in hospitals.
{"title":"Use of Personal Cell Phones by Nurses is Barrier to Effective Nursing Care in Hospitals: A Qualitative Research.","authors":"Reza Negarandeh, Masoumeh Malek, Somayeh Molaee, Esmaeil Mohammadnejad, Sanaz Aazami","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2024.2389087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2024.2389087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using cell phones by nurses can affect the quality of care. This study aimed to explore the consequences of using cell phones by nurses in hospitals. A qualitative approach was used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Nursing staff, patients, and their relatives participated in this study. Categories of \"emotionless care,\" \"neglect in care,\" \"impaired professional behavior\" and a main theme of \"Personal cell phone is a barrier to effective nursing care\" extracted. Using cell phone during work could jeopardize patients' safety and ruins the nursing profession image. It is necessary to formulate guidelines on how to use cell phones in hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-09DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2024.2389084
Paul Ulrich Hahn, Carla Formoso Pico, Vicki Moran, Heidi Israel, Christopher Behr
Introduction: Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) have emerged nationwide to help address the societal and economic costs of violence. Little literature exists regarding selecting those patients most likely to benefit from intensive case management. The study aims to describe the pediatric patient population presenting at a Level 1 ACS trauma center with a chief complaint of violent trauma and identify the characteristics of patients most at risk.
Methods: This retrospective study examined patients between the ages of eight- and nineteen-years old presenting with traumatic injury during the year 2019. Child abuse and non-accidental trauma patients were excluded.
Results: A total of 333 patients were included in the analysis. They were predominantly African American and male. The three-group design included those 8-11, 12-13, and 14-19 years. Most patients were over 14 years old (60.2%). "Classmates" was the most common relationship between assailant and victim overall (33.9%) and most prevalent in the youngest age group (8-11 year). The middle age group (12-13 year) were two times more likely to suffer from ADHD, and ADHD was a risk factor for self-harm in this age category. The oldest age group (14-19 year) suffered higher rates of gun violence and were attacked more often by unknown assailants.
Conclusions: There was a difference in the needs of the older and younger pediatric patients cared for. HVIPs should tailor their interventions to address the different age groups' needs. HVIPs could also benefit from the integration of targeted mental health services and collaboration with local educational institutions.
{"title":"Characterizing Pediatric Patients at Risk for Violence-Related Injuries at a Trauma Center in the Midwest United States.","authors":"Paul Ulrich Hahn, Carla Formoso Pico, Vicki Moran, Heidi Israel, Christopher Behr","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2024.2389084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2024.2389084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) have emerged nationwide to help address the societal and economic costs of violence. Little literature exists regarding selecting those patients most likely to benefit from intensive case management. The study aims to describe the pediatric patient population presenting at a Level 1 ACS trauma center with a chief complaint of violent trauma and identify the characteristics of patients most at risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined patients between the ages of eight- and nineteen-years old presenting with traumatic injury during the year 2019. Child abuse and non-accidental trauma patients were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 333 patients were included in the analysis. They were predominantly African American and male. The three-group design included those 8-11, 12-13, and 14-19 years. Most patients were over 14 years old (60.2%). \"Classmates\" was the most common relationship between assailant and victim overall (33.9%) and most prevalent in the youngest age group (8-11 year). The middle age group (12-13 year) were two times more likely to suffer from ADHD, and ADHD was a risk factor for self-harm in this age category. The oldest age group (14-19 year) suffered higher rates of gun violence and were attacked more often by unknown assailants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a difference in the needs of the older and younger pediatric patients cared for. HVIPs should tailor their interventions to address the different age groups' needs. HVIPs could also benefit from the integration of targeted mental health services and collaboration with local educational institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141908481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2024.2383907
Mark Cwiek, Dimitrios Zikos, Mark Kato, Mark Taylor
The establishment of the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) was authorized in the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, and it mandated a federal database to collect information related to adverse actions initially against just physicians and dentists throughout the United States, including payments from malpractice lawsuits, restrictions on clinical privileges by hospitals, and medical licensure limitations and revocations by state licensing boards. The aggregate data reports made by this federal data bank began in 1991. The reporting level for the first ten years remained relatively stable in the nationwide range of 16,000 to 18,000 reports per year, but then a steady decline occurred over the second and third decades to under 8,000 reports per year by the year 2021. The researchers in this study explored a theory that might explain at least part of the drop in the states' reporting levels. That is, states that could be called "Plaintiff-Favorable" (Arizona, Kentucky, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington) would demonstrate a lesser rate of decline or even an increase in the reporting levels, and states that could be characterized as "Defendant-Favorable" (California, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Texas) would demonstrate a comparatively greater rate of decline in the reporting levels. The decline in reporting to the NPDB proved fairly consistent for both Plaintiff-Favorable and Defendant-Favorable states. The larger question as to why there occurred an overall negative trend in reporting to the NPDB across the United States during the second and third decades remains an intriguing area for future exploration.
{"title":"The Steep Decline in Reporting to the National Practioner Data Bank, and a Look at Reporting Levels from \"Plaintiff-Favorable\" and \"Defendant-Favorable\" States.","authors":"Mark Cwiek, Dimitrios Zikos, Mark Kato, Mark Taylor","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2024.2383907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2024.2383907","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The establishment of the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) was authorized in the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, and it mandated a federal database to collect information related to adverse actions initially against just physicians and dentists throughout the United States, including payments from malpractice lawsuits, restrictions on clinical privileges by hospitals, and medical licensure limitations and revocations by state licensing boards. The aggregate data reports made by this federal data bank began in 1991. The reporting level for the first ten years remained relatively stable in the nationwide range of 16,000 to 18,000 reports per year, but then a steady decline occurred over the second and third decades to under 8,000 reports per year by the year 2021. The researchers in this study explored a theory that might explain at least part of the drop in the states' reporting levels. That is, states that could be called \"Plaintiff-Favorable\" (Arizona, Kentucky, New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington) would demonstrate a lesser rate of decline or even an increase in the reporting levels, and states that could be characterized as \"Defendant-Favorable\" (California, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Texas) would demonstrate a comparatively greater rate of decline in the reporting levels. The decline in reporting to the NPDB proved fairly consistent for both Plaintiff-Favorable and Defendant-Favorable states. The larger question as to why there occurred an overall negative trend in reporting to the NPDB across the United States during the second and third decades remains an intriguing area for future exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-30DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2024.2383912
Shaher H Hamaideh, Abdallah Abu Khait, Hanan Al-Modallal, Rami Masa'deh, Ayman Hamdan-Mansour, Mohammed ALBashtawy
The aim of this study is to assess the levels, relationships, and predictors of resilience and perceived stress among psychiatric nurses working in inpatient units. A descriptive, cross-sectional, predictive design was employed to collect data from 140 psychiatric nurses through a self-reported questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic and work-related variables, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25), and perceived stress scale (PSS-10). The total mean score of the perceived stress was 22.73 (SD = 3.54) indicating a moderate level. The total mean score of the resilience was 49.49 (SD = 15.31) indicating a low level. Resilience correlated positively with educational level and job satisfaction; and negatively with intention to leave psychiatric settings. Significant differences were found in resilience with educational level, intention to leave psychiatric settings, and job satisfaction. Three independent variables predicted resilience: educational level, ward/unit, and job satisfaction; and only one variable (intention to leave psychiatric settings) predicted the perceived stress.
{"title":"Perceived Stress and Resilience Among Psychiatric Nurses Working in Inpatients Units.","authors":"Shaher H Hamaideh, Abdallah Abu Khait, Hanan Al-Modallal, Rami Masa'deh, Ayman Hamdan-Mansour, Mohammed ALBashtawy","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2024.2383912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2024.2383912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to assess the levels, relationships, and predictors of resilience and perceived stress among psychiatric nurses working in inpatient units. A descriptive, cross-sectional, predictive design was employed to collect data from 140 psychiatric nurses through a self-reported questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic and work-related variables, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25), and perceived stress scale (PSS-10). The total mean score of the perceived stress was 22.73 (SD = 3.54) indicating a moderate level. The total mean score of the resilience was 49.49 (SD = 15.31) indicating a low level. Resilience correlated positively with educational level and job satisfaction; and negatively with intention to leave psychiatric settings. Significant differences were found in resilience with educational level, intention to leave psychiatric settings, and job satisfaction. Three independent variables predicted resilience: educational level, ward/unit, and job satisfaction; and only one variable (intention to leave psychiatric settings) predicted the perceived stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141794134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2024.2383908
Amina Jamal, Jiby Abraham, Anju M Neeliyara, Akshara Saji
Critical care is the specialized treatment provided to patients in intensive care units who are severely ill and need extensive care and close monitoring. Hence the present study was undertaken. A total of hundred samples were collected exclusively on those who stayed a minimum of five days in Intensive Care Unit from two reputed Multispecialty Tertiary Hospitals from Kerala, India. APACHE II scoring system, Day World Wide's ICU Questionnaire and Glasgow Coma Scale were adopted to collect patient's data such as personal details, demographic data, medical history, bio-physical parameters, bio- chemical parameters, feeding techniques, time of feeding and nutritional requirements. Admission to Medical ICU were about 43% with respiratory failure, sepsis and other infections, 22% were admitted with neurological diseases and 35% were nephrology patient. It is evident that about 79% were suffering from anorexia. Comparing the administration of exclusive commercial feed to commercial plus kitchen feed, it was observed that patients fed with the latter experienced increased abdominal pain (21%) and vomiting (17%). Diarrhea was more common in patients fed with commercial formula (12%), while constipation was higher in patients fed with kitchen feed (19%). There is no conclusive evidence favoring either exclusive commercial feed or kitchen plus commercial feed. A small percentage (7%) of patients had a mortality rate exceeding 80%. Positive outcomes were observed in critically ill patients through the enteral feeding system, with no significant difference between exclusive commercial feed and kitchen plus commercial feed.
重症监护是为重症监护室中病情严重、需要大量护理和密切监测的病人提供的专业治疗。因此,我们开展了本研究。本研究从印度喀拉拉邦两家著名的多专科三甲医院的重症监护病房中收集了至少五天的患者样本,共计 100 份。研究采用了 APACHE II 评分系统、Day World Wide 的重症监护室问卷和格拉斯哥昏迷量表来收集病人的数据,如个人资料、人口统计学数据、病史、生物物理参数、生物化学参数、喂养技术、喂养时间和营养需求。入住内科重症监护室的患者中,约 43% 患有呼吸衰竭、败血症和其他感染,22% 患有神经系统疾病,35% 患有肾病。很明显,约 79% 的患者患有厌食症。通过比较只喂食商业饲料和商业饲料加厨房饲料的情况,发现喂食后者的患者腹痛(21%)和呕吐(17%)的情况有所增加。腹泻在使用商业配方奶粉喂养的患者中更为常见(12%),而便秘在使用厨房饲料喂养的患者中更为常见(19%)。目前还没有确凿的证据表明完全使用商业饲料或厨房加商业饲料更有利。一小部分患者(7%)的死亡率超过 80%。通过肠内喂养系统观察到危重病人的积极疗效,但专用商业饲料和厨房加商业饲料之间没有显著差异。
{"title":"Effect of Nutritional Support on Energy Balance and Its Clinical Outcome in ICU [Intensive Care Unit] Patients.","authors":"Amina Jamal, Jiby Abraham, Anju M Neeliyara, Akshara Saji","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2024.2383908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2024.2383908","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical care is the specialized treatment provided to patients in intensive care units who are severely ill and need extensive care and close monitoring. Hence the present study was undertaken. A total of hundred samples were collected exclusively on those who stayed a minimum of five days in Intensive Care Unit from two reputed Multispecialty Tertiary Hospitals from Kerala, India. APACHE II scoring system, Day World Wide's ICU Questionnaire and Glasgow Coma Scale were adopted to collect patient's data such as personal details, demographic data, medical history, bio-physical parameters, bio- chemical parameters, feeding techniques, time of feeding and nutritional requirements. Admission to Medical ICU were about 43% with respiratory failure, sepsis and other infections, 22% were admitted with neurological diseases and 35% were nephrology patient. It is evident that about 79% were suffering from anorexia. Comparing the administration of exclusive commercial feed to commercial plus kitchen feed, it was observed that patients fed with the latter experienced increased abdominal pain (21%) and vomiting (17%). Diarrhea was more common in patients fed with commercial formula (12%), while constipation was higher in patients fed with kitchen feed (19%). There is no conclusive evidence favoring either exclusive commercial feed or kitchen plus commercial feed. A small percentage (7%) of patients had a mortality rate exceeding 80%. Positive outcomes were observed in critically ill patients through the enteral feeding system, with no significant difference between exclusive commercial feed and kitchen plus commercial feed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141790071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-25DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2024.2383909
Tengiz Verulava, Temur Barkalaia, Giorgi Chiladze
Motivation is defined as human effort, striving, stimulation process for successful work, and achievement of organizational goals. The purpose of the research is to study the factors determining the motivation and job satisfaction of primary healthcare personnel in Georgia. The relevance of the issue is indicated by the poorly development of the primary healthcare system in Georgia, which is confirmed by the fact that the number of referrals to outpatient medical institutions is 3.6 per capita per year, while it reaches 7.5 in European countries. A quantitative study was conducted in this research. As a result of the research, it was determined that motivation and job satisfaction are complex constructs. The following main factors that influence the job satisfaction of employees in primary care organizations were identified: individual characteristics, financial and non-financial incentives, organizational structures and processes, including supervision, leadership, fairness, and responsibility for the distribution of resources, staff dynamics, and team cohesion, relationships with colleagues and management, relationships with patients, intellectual stimulation, opportunities for continuing medical education. A family physician's and family nurse practitioner's job satisfaction significantly improves the services and has a positive impact on the patient's well-being. Health policymakers and managers need to critically analyze the importance of providing additional incentives. In order to improve the job satisfaction of primary health care workers, in addition to salary, special emphasis should be placed on supporting family life, creating decent living conditions, adequate free time, educational prospects, and better opportunities for professional development and promotion.
{"title":"Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction among Primary Healthcare Workers in Georgia.","authors":"Tengiz Verulava, Temur Barkalaia, Giorgi Chiladze","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2024.2383909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2024.2383909","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivation is defined as human effort, striving, stimulation process for successful work, and achievement of organizational goals. The purpose of the research is to study the factors determining the motivation and job satisfaction of primary healthcare personnel in Georgia. The relevance of the issue is indicated by the poorly development of the primary healthcare system in Georgia, which is confirmed by the fact that the number of referrals to outpatient medical institutions is 3.6 per capita per year, while it reaches 7.5 in European countries. A quantitative study was conducted in this research. As a result of the research, it was determined that motivation and job satisfaction are complex constructs. The following main factors that influence the job satisfaction of employees in primary care organizations were identified: individual characteristics, financial and non-financial incentives, organizational structures and processes, including supervision, leadership, fairness, and responsibility for the distribution of resources, staff dynamics, and team cohesion, relationships with colleagues and management, relationships with patients, intellectual stimulation, opportunities for continuing medical education. A family physician's and family nurse practitioner's job satisfaction significantly improves the services and has a positive impact on the patient's well-being. Health policymakers and managers need to critically analyze the importance of providing additional incentives. In order to improve the job satisfaction of primary health care workers, in addition to salary, special emphasis should be placed on supporting family life, creating decent living conditions, adequate free time, educational prospects, and better opportunities for professional development and promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141762944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2022-08-16DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2022.2111984
Geoffrey A Silvera, Jeff Canar, Noor Shakeel, Peter Butler, Andy Garman
Governing boards and executive leaders play important roles ensuring that their organizations work toward their missions and maintain their visions, while also meeting compliance and performance goals. The level of executive involvement in hospital governing boards varies across organizations, with little evidence to suggest whether and to what degree executive involvement influences hospital performance. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of executive involvement in governance on health system performance. The sample analyzed in this study were organizations responding to The Governance Institute's (TGI) Biennial Survey of Hospital and Health Systems in 2017. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine associations between self-reported executive leadership team involvement in governing boards and a composite metric of health system performance calculated by Truven Analytics as part of the "Top 100" program. Results indicate executive involvement is associated with several organizational characteristics, including whether an institution was defined as a hospital or health system, whether or not the board was appointed by the parent/system, and whether the board was accountable to the parent/system board. Although no significant direct relationship was found between executive team involvement in governance and overall health system performance, several promising pathways for future study were identified and are discussed, including examining specific organizational performance outcomes rather than composite measures.
{"title":"Executive Involvement in Governing Boards and Hospital and Health System Performance.","authors":"Geoffrey A Silvera, Jeff Canar, Noor Shakeel, Peter Butler, Andy Garman","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2111984","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2111984","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Governing boards and executive leaders play important roles ensuring that their organizations work toward their missions and maintain their visions, while also meeting compliance and performance goals. The level of executive involvement in hospital governing boards varies across organizations, with little evidence to suggest whether and to what degree executive involvement influences hospital performance. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of executive involvement in governance on health system performance. The sample analyzed in this study were organizations responding to The Governance Institute's (TGI) Biennial Survey of Hospital and Health Systems in 2017. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine associations between self-reported executive leadership team involvement in governing boards and a composite metric of health system performance calculated by Truven Analytics as part of the \"Top 100\" program. Results indicate executive involvement is associated with several organizational characteristics, including whether an institution was defined as a hospital or health system, whether or not the board was appointed by the parent/system, and whether the board was accountable to the parent/system board. Although no significant direct relationship was found between executive team involvement in governance and overall health system performance, several promising pathways for future study were identified and are discussed, including examining specific organizational performance outcomes rather than composite measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40631559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2022-08-24DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2022.2114965
Akbar Ghiasi, Robert Weech-Maldonado
Background: One of the major tenets of contingency theory is that the appropriate fit between strategy and environmental contingencies results in better financial performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) moderates the association between hospital strategy and financial performance. Methods: We used longitudinal data from 2011 to 2016 from US urban general acute care hospitals. Four secondary datasets were used: the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, Medicare cost reports (CMS), Area Health Resource File (AHRF), and the Robert Graham Center's SDI. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression model was used to analyze the data. An interaction term was used to test the moderating effect of the SDI on the strategy-financial performance relationship. Results and Discussion: Our results showed that compared to hybrids, the SDI moderates the relationship between strategy and financial performance for cost leaders and hybrids. Increasing market social deprivation increases the hospital operating margin of cost leaders by 0.06%. Similarly, increasing levels of market social deprivation increases the hospital operating margin of hybrids by 0.06% (p < 0.05). As such, our results suggest that social deprivation may affect the viability of hospital strategy.
{"title":"The Moderating Effect of the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) on the Relationship Between Hospital Strategy and Financial Performance.","authors":"Akbar Ghiasi, Robert Weech-Maldonado","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2114965","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2114965","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> One of the major tenets of contingency theory is that the appropriate fit between strategy and environmental contingencies results in better financial performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) moderates the association between hospital strategy and financial performance. <b>Methods:</b> We used longitudinal data from 2011 to 2016 from US urban general acute care hospitals. Four secondary datasets were used: the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, Medicare cost reports (CMS), Area Health Resource File (AHRF), and the Robert Graham Center's SDI. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression model was used to analyze the data. An interaction term was used to test the moderating effect of the SDI on the strategy-financial performance relationship. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> Our results showed that compared to hybrids, the SDI moderates the relationship between strategy and financial performance for cost leaders and hybrids. Increasing market social deprivation increases the hospital operating margin of cost leaders by 0.06%. Similarly, increasing levels of market social deprivation increases the hospital operating margin of hybrids by 0.06% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). As such, our results suggest that social deprivation may affect the viability of hospital strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"173-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40635192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2022-08-22DOI: 10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917
Laleh Mahmoudi, Gelareh Tajgardoon, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Mohammad Vahid Jorat
Rationale, aims and objectives: Medical residents are among the most important and influential members of the medical team and the level of their knowledge regarding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a good predictor of the ability to prevent the occurrence of DDIs, as well as safe and rational prescribing in inpatient settings. This survey was designed to evaluate internal medicine and cardiology residents' knowledge and opinion toward DDIs and to determine different sources of DDI information used by this population. Method: This cross-sectional knowledge attitude practice (KAP) questionnaire study was conducted in Shiraz, Iran. A 25-question questionnaire was designed and completed by 86 internal medicine and cardiology residents. The questions were related to the participants' demographic information, their practice characteristics, the information sources used by the participants, the residents' opinion regarding DDIs, and their knowledge regarding the interaction between 8 drug pairs. Results: The results showed that when the participants wanted to learn more about DDIs, most of them used software on mobile or tablet (59.3%). Nearly three-fourths of the participants (73.82%) reported that when a patient was about to be exposed to a potential DDI, they were informed by software on mobile or tablet that the interaction may be present. On average, residents answered 44.03% ± 23.79 of drug pair questions correctly.Conclusion: Our results show insufficient practice skills, as well as relatively poor knowledge concerning the participants' answers to questions. It seems that further practical training and education are required to enable prescribers to prevent potential DDIs.
{"title":"A Survey of Medical Residents' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice about Drug-Drug Interactions, Shiraz, Iran.","authors":"Laleh Mahmoudi, Gelareh Tajgardoon, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Mohammad Vahid Jorat","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2112917","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale, aims and objectives:</b> Medical residents are among the most important and influential members of the medical team and the level of their knowledge regarding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is a good predictor of the ability to prevent the occurrence of DDIs, as well as safe and rational prescribing in inpatient settings. This survey was designed to evaluate internal medicine and cardiology residents' knowledge and opinion toward DDIs and to determine different sources of DDI information used by this population. <b>Method:</b> This cross-sectional knowledge attitude practice (KAP) questionnaire study was conducted in Shiraz, Iran. A 25-question questionnaire was designed and completed by 86 internal medicine and cardiology residents. The questions were related to the participants' demographic information, their practice characteristics, the information sources used by the participants, the residents' opinion regarding DDIs, and their knowledge regarding the interaction between 8 drug pairs. <b>Results:</b> The results showed that when the participants wanted to learn more about DDIs, most of them used software on mobile or tablet (59.3%). Nearly three-fourths of the participants (73.82%) reported that when a patient was about to be exposed to a potential DDI, they were informed by software on mobile or tablet that the interaction may be present. On average, residents answered 44.03% ± 23.79 of drug pair questions correctly.<b>Conclusion:</b> Our results show insufficient practice skills, as well as relatively poor knowledge concerning the participants' answers to questions. It seems that further practical training and education are required to enable prescribers to prevent potential DDIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"164-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40417012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The study aim was to determine the risk of Manual patient handling (MPH) in Shahroud public hospitals, Iran. A cross-sectional study was performed in Imam Hossein (IHospital) and Bahar (BHospital) with 21 wards. MPH risk assessment was performed using MAPO (Movement and Assistance of Hospital Patient) index. The ratio of operator to disabled patient (NC/Op and PC/Op), lifting, minor aid, wheelchair, environmental, and training factor are evaluated to calculate MAPO index. Among studied wards 57%, 33.3%, and 9.5%, respectively, were in the high, moderate, and low risk exposure level. The maximum MAPO score were 16.7 in CCU of IHospital. Emergency ward of BHospital had the highest score of 9.8 and PC/OP ratio 17.5. The most risk factors were minor aid (90.5%), lifting factor (71.4%), and PC/OP (66.7%). Immediate ergonomic action is recommended.
{"title":"The Risk Assessment of Patient Handling in Hospitals of Northeast of Iran.","authors":"Majid Bagheri Hosseinabadi, Niloofar Zandi, Nahideh Sartavi, Roqayeh Aliyari, Farideh Sadeghian","doi":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2114964","DOIUrl":"10.1080/00185868.2022.2114964","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aim was to determine the risk of Manual patient handling (MPH) in Shahroud public hospitals, Iran. A cross-sectional study was performed in Imam Hossein (IHospital) and Bahar (BHospital) with 21 wards. MPH risk assessment was performed using MAPO (Movement and Assistance of Hospital Patient) index. The ratio of operator to disabled patient (NC/Op and PC/Op), lifting, minor aid, wheelchair, environmental, and training factor are evaluated to calculate MAPO index. Among studied wards 57%, 33.3%, and 9.5%, respectively, were in the high, moderate, and low risk exposure level. The maximum MAPO score were 16.7 in CCU of IHospital. Emergency ward of BHospital had the highest score of 9.8 and PC/OP ratio 17.5. The most risk factors were minor aid (90.5%), lifting factor (71.4%), and PC/OP (66.7%). Immediate ergonomic action is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":55886,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Topics","volume":" ","pages":"184-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40438036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}