Background
The literature points out that expectations can shape treatment outcomes regarding pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). There are several instruments available to assess pain-related expectations, and most studies haven't reported the measurement properties of such scales.
Objectives
This study aimed to adapt and examine the measurement properties of the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS), the Treatment Expectations in Chronic Pain Scale (TEC), and four single-item expectations scales in Brazilian Portuguese in CLBP.
Methods
A total of 203 patients participated in the study. The cross-cultural adaptation followed guideline recommendations. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Cronbach's α were used to assess structural validity and internal consistency, respectively. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to test for reliability, and Smallest Detectable Change to analyze measurement error. Spearman's correlation was used to assess hypothesis testing for construct validity.
Results
CFA confirmed a two-factor model for the SETS-Br, and TEC-Br scales showed adequate CFA fit indexes. Internal consistency was acceptable (α ≥ .70) for SETS-Br positive domain, TEC-Br Ideal, and TEC-Br Predicted, but not for SETS-Br negative domain. Reliability was acceptable for the six expectation scales included in the study (ICC>.74). All the expectation scales confirmed at least 75 % of the hypotheses raised a priori for construct validity.
Conclusions
TEC-Br scales met the criteria for good quality for all the measurement properties assessed. Our results suggest that the six scales tested seem to measure different dimensions of the expectations construct, since they showed weak to moderate correlations when compared.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
