首页 > 最新文献

Canadian Geriatrics Journal最新文献

英文 中文
Virtual Goals of Care Consultation for Advanced Frailty: a Qualitative Implementation Study Providing Insights from the Pandemic. 晚期虚弱护理咨询的虚拟目标:一项从大流行中提供见解的定性实施研究
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.759
Nabha Shetty, Tanya MacLeod, Ashley Paige Miller, Melissa Buckler, Laurie Mallery, Anne-Marie Krueger-Naug, Maia von Maltzahn, Paige Moorhouse

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, long-term care (LTC) facilities faced challenges in establishing appropriate goals of care (GoC) for residents during health crises. To address this, a virtual specialist consultation program was implemented to align care interventions with residents' frailty and expected outcomes.

Methods: We explored barriers and enablers to the implementation and sustainability of the program using structured interviews (n=20) with LTC leadership, health-care staff, and members of the program. Data were coded according to the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) using thematic analysis.

Results: Participants described how the program improved care and reduced unnecessary transfers. Implementation was enabled by a high degree of tension for change, relative priority, relative advantage, and the team's shared mental model of frailty-care. Inconsistencies in GoC approaches and information silos between LTC and acute-care challenged implementation. Sustainability was hindered by decreased pandemic urgency, resulting in reallocation of resources to usual care. The need for a specialized GoC service in LTC became less obvious outside of a crisis.

Conclusions: This implementation study provides important insights for future spread and scale of embedding virtual specialist consultation services into LTC. The findings underscore the importance of collegial relationships and shared care philosophies to effectively implement frailty-informed care initiatives during crises. However, sustaining cross-sectoral GoC services may be challenging amidst evolving workloads and prevailing cultural perceptions of end-of-life care needs.

背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,长期护理机构在为健康危机期间的居民建立适当的护理目标(GoC)方面面临挑战。为了解决这个问题,实施了一个虚拟专家咨询计划,以使护理干预与居民的虚弱和预期结果保持一致。方法:我们使用结构化访谈(n=20)与LTC领导、卫生保健人员和项目成员探讨了项目实施和可持续性的障碍和促进因素。使用专题分析,根据实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的结构对数据进行编码。结果:参与者描述了该计划如何改善护理和减少不必要的转移。实现是由高度紧张的变化、相对优先级、相对优势和团队对脆弱护理的共享心理模型实现的。长期医疗保健和急症护理之间的GoC方法和信息孤岛的不一致性给实施带来了挑战。大流行病紧迫性的降低阻碍了可持续性,导致将资源重新分配给常规护理。在LTC中对专门的GoC服务的需求在危机之外变得不那么明显了。结论:本实施研究为在LTC中嵌入虚拟专家咨询服务的未来传播和规模提供了重要的见解。研究结果强调了学院关系和共同护理理念在危机期间有效实施弱者知情护理倡议的重要性。然而,在不断变化的工作量和对临终关怀需求的普遍文化观念中,维持跨部门的GoC服务可能具有挑战性。
{"title":"Virtual Goals of Care Consultation for Advanced Frailty: a Qualitative Implementation Study Providing Insights from the Pandemic.","authors":"Nabha Shetty, Tanya MacLeod, Ashley Paige Miller, Melissa Buckler, Laurie Mallery, Anne-Marie Krueger-Naug, Maia von Maltzahn, Paige Moorhouse","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.759","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.759","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, long-term care (LTC) facilities faced challenges in establishing appropriate goals of care (GoC) for residents during health crises. To address this, a virtual specialist consultation program was implemented to align care interventions with residents' frailty and expected outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored barriers and enablers to the implementation and sustainability of the program using structured interviews (n=20) with LTC leadership, health-care staff, and members of the program. Data were coded according to the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described how the program improved care and reduced unnecessary transfers. Implementation was enabled by a high degree of tension for change, relative priority, relative advantage, and the team's shared mental model of frailty-care. Inconsistencies in GoC approaches and information silos between LTC and acute-care challenged implementation. Sustainability was hindered by decreased pandemic urgency, resulting in reallocation of resources to usual care. The need for a specialized GoC service in LTC became less obvious outside of a crisis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This implementation study provides important insights for future spread and scale of embedding virtual specialist consultation services into LTC. The findings underscore the importance of collegial relationships and shared care philosophies to effectively implement frailty-informed care initiatives during crises. However, sustaining cross-sectoral GoC services may be challenging amidst evolving workloads and prevailing cultural perceptions of end-of-life care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882204/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Dementia: a Multijurisdictional Meta-Analysis of the Impact of the First Two Pandemic Waves on Acute Health-care Utilization and Mortality in Canada. COVID-19大流行与痴呆症:加拿大前两波大流行对急性医疗保健利用和死亡率影响的多司法管辖区荟萃分析
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.776
Deniz Cetin-Sahin, Claire Godard-Sebillotte, Susan E Bronskill, Dallas Seitz, Debra G Morgan, Laura C Maclagan, Nadia Sourial, Jacqueline Quail, Andrea Gruneir, Machelle Wilchesky, Louis Rochette, Victoria Kubuta Massamba, Erik Youngson, Christina Diong, Eric E Smith, Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre, Mélanie Le Berre, Colleen J Maxwell, Julie Kosteniuk, Delphine Bosson-Rieutort, Ting Wang, Kori Miskucza, Isabelle Vedel

Background: Previous studies on the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on persons living with dementia (PLWD) were mostly conducted in a single jurisdiction or focused on a limited number of outcomes. Our study estimates the impact of the first two pandemic waves on emergency department (ED) visits (all-cause/ambulatory care sensitive conditions), hospitalizations (all-cause/30-day readmissions), and all-cause mortality in four Canadian jurisdictions.

Methods: Using administrative databases from Alberta, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Quebec, we assembled two closed retrospective cohorts (2019/pre-pandemic control and 2020/pandemic) of PLWD aged 65+. Within community and nursing home settings, the rates of the above-mentioned outcomes in three pandemic periods (first wave, interim period, second wave) were compared to the corresponding pre-pandemic periods. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the provincial incident rate ratios.

Results: Pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts included 167,095 vs. 173,240 (community) and 93,374 vs. 92,434 (nursing home) individuals, respectively. During the first wave, community and nursing home populations experienced significant declines in the rates of all-cause ED visits (36% vs. 40%) and hospitalizations (25% vs. 22%), which persisted in the following periods in the community. These declines were greater for the rates of ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visits and 30-day readmissions. Mortality was 36% higher in nursing homes (first wave) and 13% higher in the community (second wave).

Conclusions: It is key to prepare for future health crises and ensure that PLWD receive necessary care and services and do not have such a high mortality rate. Attention should be equally given to PLWD living in their homes and nursing homes.

背景:以往关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对痴呆症患者(PLWD)影响的研究大多是在单一辖区进行的,或者只关注有限数量的结果。我们的研究估计了前两波大流行对加拿大四个司法管辖区急诊科(ED)就诊(全因/门诊护理敏感情况)、住院(全因/30天再入院)和全因死亡率的影响。方法:利用艾伯塔省、安大略省、萨斯喀彻温省和魁北克省的行政数据库,我们收集了两个65岁以上PLWD的封闭回顾性队列(2019年/大流行前控制和2020年/大流行)。在社区和养老院环境中,将三个大流行时期(第一波、过渡时期、第二波)上述结果的发生率与相应的大流行前时期进行了比较。我们对各省事故率比率进行了随机效应荟萃分析。结果:大流行前和大流行队列分别包括167,095人对173,240人(社区)和93,374人对92,434人(养老院)。在第一波浪潮中,社区和养老院人口经历了全因急诊科就诊率(36%对40%)和住院率(25%对22%)的显著下降,这种情况在社区的后续时期持续存在。这些下降对于门诊护理敏感条件急诊科就诊率和30天再入院率更大。养老院(第一波)的死亡率高出36%,社区(第二波)的死亡率高出13%。结论:关键是要为未来的健康危机做好准备,确保PLWD得到必要的护理和服务,避免如此高的死亡率。对住在家中和疗养院的残疾人士应给予同等的关注。
{"title":"The COVID-19 Pandemic and Dementia: a Multijurisdictional Meta-Analysis of the Impact of the First Two Pandemic Waves on Acute Health-care Utilization and Mortality in Canada.","authors":"Deniz Cetin-Sahin, Claire Godard-Sebillotte, Susan E Bronskill, Dallas Seitz, Debra G Morgan, Laura C Maclagan, Nadia Sourial, Jacqueline Quail, Andrea Gruneir, Machelle Wilchesky, Louis Rochette, Victoria Kubuta Massamba, Erik Youngson, Christina Diong, Eric E Smith, Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre, Mélanie Le Berre, Colleen J Maxwell, Julie Kosteniuk, Delphine Bosson-Rieutort, Ting Wang, Kori Miskucza, Isabelle Vedel","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.776","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.776","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies on the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on persons living with dementia (PLWD) were mostly conducted in a single jurisdiction or focused on a limited number of outcomes. Our study estimates the impact of the first two pandemic waves on emergency department (ED) visits (all-cause/ambulatory care sensitive conditions), hospitalizations (all-cause/30-day readmissions), and all-cause mortality in four Canadian jurisdictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using administrative databases from Alberta, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Quebec, we assembled two closed retrospective cohorts (2019/pre-pandemic control and 2020/pandemic) of PLWD aged 65+. Within community and nursing home settings, the rates of the above-mentioned outcomes in three pandemic periods (first wave, interim period, second wave) were compared to the corresponding pre-pandemic periods. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the provincial incident rate ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts included 167,095 vs. 173,240 (community) and 93,374 vs. 92,434 (nursing home) individuals, respectively. During the first wave, community and nursing home populations experienced significant declines in the rates of all-cause ED visits (36% vs. 40%) and hospitalizations (25% vs. 22%), which persisted in the following periods in the community. These declines were greater for the rates of ambulatory care sensitive condition ED visits and 30-day readmissions. Mortality was 36% higher in nursing homes (first wave) and 13% higher in the community (second wave).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is key to prepare for future health crises and ensure that PLWD receive necessary care and services and do not have such a high mortality rate. Attention should be equally given to PLWD living in their homes and nursing homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"16-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882212/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To What Extent are Alberta Nursing Homes and Supportive Living Facilities Integrated with Their Community? A Sequential Quantitative-Qualitative Study. 艾伯塔省养老院和支持性生活设施与社区的融合程度如何?序贯定量定性研究。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.783
Michelle C Gao, Saima Rajabali, Adrian Wagg

Background: Nursing homes and supportive living facilities (continuing care homes [CCH]) are often regarded as separate from their communities. Although occasional studies highlight volunteering or intergenerational activities, there is little systematic evaluation of the existence of activities in CCH that may promote community integration.

Methods: Study Design: The study utilized a sequential quantitative-qualitative approach: cross-sectional survey followed by semi-structured interviews. Setting: All registered long-term care (nursing home) and supportive living facilities (Levels 3, 4, and 4 Dementia) within Alberta. Subjects: The survey and interviews were conducted with directors of care. The survey was distributed to 334 facilities. Data saturation in the interviews was reached with seven participants.

Results: 140 responses were received; 116 were analyzable (34.7% response rate). The range of activities varied widely. Prior to Covid-19, the most common were spiritual activities entering CCH (96.5%) and volunteers entering CCH (93.0%); CCH rarely had activities such as child daycare (5.2%). 12.9% of spiritual activities entering CCH had not been restarted following the pandemic, but homes were planning to restart this activity (16) or start it as a new activity (1). There was no statistically significant relationship between any activity and facility owner-operator model, size, type, or geography (urban/rural) at any survey time category. Four themes emerged from the interviews: resident quality of life and well-being, home's capacity and openness, sources of support, and planning and programming for implementation.

Conclusions: This study addresses a knowledge gap regarding community integration in CCH and provides insight on the types of community-integrated activities occurring in Alberta's CCH.

背景:养老院和支持性生活设施(持续护理院[CCH])通常被视为与社区分开。虽然偶尔有研究强调志愿服务或代际活动,但很少有系统的评估在CCH中存在可能促进社区融合的活动。方法:研究设计:本研究采用连续定量-定性方法:横断面调查后采用半结构化访谈。环境:艾伯塔省所有注册的长期护理(养老院)和支持性生活设施(3、4和4级痴呆症)。调查对象:与护理主任进行调查和访谈。调查结果分发给334个设施。在7个参与者的访谈中达到了数据饱和。结果:共收到回复140份;116例可分析,有效率34.7%。活动的范围差别很大。新冠肺炎疫情前,进入CCH最常见的是精神活动(96.5%)和志愿者(93.0%);CCH很少有儿童日托等活动(5.2%)。12.9%进入CCH的精神活动在大流行后没有重新启动,但家庭计划重新启动该活动(16)或将其作为新活动开始(1)。在任何调查时间类别中,任何活动与设施所有者-经营者模式、规模、类型或地理(城市/农村)之间没有统计学上的显著关系。采访中出现了四个主题:居民的生活质量和福祉,家庭的能力和开放性,支持的来源,以及实施的规划和规划。结论:本研究解决了关于社区卫生保健社区整合的知识差距,并提供了阿尔伯塔省社区卫生保健社区整合活动类型的见解。
{"title":"To What Extent are Alberta Nursing Homes and Supportive Living Facilities Integrated with Their Community? A Sequential Quantitative-Qualitative Study.","authors":"Michelle C Gao, Saima Rajabali, Adrian Wagg","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.783","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.783","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing homes and supportive living facilities (continuing care homes [CCH]) are often regarded as separate from their communities. Although occasional studies highlight volunteering or intergenerational activities, there is little systematic evaluation of the existence of activities in CCH that may promote community integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study Design: The study utilized a sequential quantitative-qualitative approach: cross-sectional survey followed by semi-structured interviews. Setting: All registered long-term care (nursing home) and supportive living facilities (Levels 3, 4, and 4 Dementia) within Alberta. Subjects: The survey and interviews were conducted with directors of care. The survey was distributed to 334 facilities. Data saturation in the interviews was reached with seven participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>140 responses were received; 116 were analyzable (34.7% response rate). The range of activities varied widely. Prior to Covid-19, the most common were spiritual activities entering CCH (96.5%) and volunteers entering CCH (93.0%); CCH rarely had activities such as child daycare (5.2%). 12.9% of spiritual activities entering CCH had not been restarted following the pandemic, but homes were planning to restart this activity (16) or start it as a new activity (1). There was no statistically significant relationship between any activity and facility owner-operator model, size, type, or geography (urban/rural) at any survey time category. Four themes emerged from the interviews: resident quality of life and well-being, home's capacity and openness, sources of support, and planning and programming for implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study addresses a knowledge gap regarding community integration in CCH and provides insight on the types of community-integrated activities occurring in Alberta's CCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882210/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thank You to Our Reviewers in 2024. 感谢我们2024年的审稿人。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01
{"title":"Thank You to Our Reviewers in 2024.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breaking the Inverse Care Law for Fall Prevention Programs: a Collaborative and Community-led Approach. 打破反护理法预防跌倒项目:合作和社区主导的方法。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.799
Nicholas C Chan, Joe Pedulla, Alicia Remark, Sue Bartleman, Ana Macpherson, Howard Abrams, Melissa Chang
{"title":"Breaking the Inverse Care Law for Fall Prevention Programs: a Collaborative and Community-led Approach.","authors":"Nicholas C Chan, Joe Pedulla, Alicia Remark, Sue Bartleman, Ana Macpherson, Howard Abrams, Melissa Chang","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.799","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.799","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"103-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882208/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laboratory Test Use and Values in the Last Year of Life-a Matched Cohort Design. 生命最后一年的实验室检测使用及其价值——匹配队列设计。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.808
Rhiannon L Roberts, Haris Imsirovic, Robert Talarico, Wenshan Li, André Carrington, Kruti Patel, Douglas Manuel, Peter Tanuseputro, Steven Hawken, Colleen Webber

Background: As individuals approach death, they experience declines in their cognitive, physical, motor, sensory, physiologic, and psychosocial functions. In this exploratory study we examined individuals' physiologic changes in the last year of life by examining laboratory tests commonly used in clinical practice.

Methods: Using health administrative datasets, we conducted an observational matched cohort study to assess laboratory test use and values over a decedent's last 12 months and a matched observation window for non-decedents. Laboratory tests included tests for electrolytes: potassium and sodium; complete blood count: hemoglobin and leukocytes; diabetes: hemoglobin A1c; and kidney or liver function: albumin-serum, alanine aminotransferase, and creatinine.

Results: We identified 376,463 decedents, 367,474 (97.6%) of whom were matched to non-decedents (similar age and sex). For each test, the proportion of non-decedents who received the test was stable over the 12-month observation period. A higher proportion of decedents had a laboratory test than non-decedents for all but the diabetes test. As decedents neared death, there was a gradual increase in test use until their final month of life, when test use dramatically increased. Across all laboratory tests, test values remained similar for non-decedents over the 12-month observation period. However, for decedents, there were differences in the magnitude and direction of the test values over the 12 months.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate distinct changes in decedents' laboratory test use and values over their last 12 months. Future work should explore whether laboratory tests could predict survival or improve the performance of mortality prediction models.

背景:当个体接近死亡时,他们的认知、身体、运动、感觉、生理和社会心理功能都会下降。在这项探索性研究中,我们通过检查临床实践中常用的实验室测试来检查个体在生命最后一年的生理变化。方法:使用卫生管理数据集,我们进行了一项观察性匹配队列研究,以评估死者过去12个月的实验室检测使用情况和价值,并对非死者进行了匹配观察窗口。实验室检查包括对电解质的检查:钾和钠;全血细胞计数:血红蛋白和白细胞;糖尿病:糖化血红蛋白;肾功能或肝功能:白蛋白血清、丙氨酸转氨酶和肌酐。结果:我们确定了376,463例死者,其中367,474例(97.6%)与非死者(年龄和性别相似)相匹配。在12个月的观察期内,每次测试中接受测试的非死者的比例是稳定的。除糖尿病测试外,死者接受实验室测试的比例高于非死者。随着死者接近死亡,测试的使用逐渐增加,直到他们生命的最后一个月,测试的使用急剧增加。在12个月的观察期内,所有实验室检测中,非死者的检测值保持相似。然而,对于死者,在12个月内,测试值的大小和方向存在差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在过去的12个月里,死者的实验室测试使用和价值发生了明显的变化。未来的工作应该探索实验室测试是否可以预测生存或改善死亡率预测模型的性能。
{"title":"Laboratory Test Use and Values in the Last Year of Life-a Matched Cohort Design.","authors":"Rhiannon L Roberts, Haris Imsirovic, Robert Talarico, Wenshan Li, André Carrington, Kruti Patel, Douglas Manuel, Peter Tanuseputro, Steven Hawken, Colleen Webber","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.808","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.808","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As individuals approach death, they experience declines in their cognitive, physical, motor, sensory, physiologic, and psychosocial functions. In this exploratory study we examined individuals' physiologic changes in the last year of life by examining laboratory tests commonly used in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using health administrative datasets, we conducted an observational matched cohort study to assess laboratory test use and values over a decedent's last 12 months and a matched observation window for non-decedents. Laboratory tests included tests for electrolytes: potassium and sodium; complete blood count: hemoglobin and leukocytes; diabetes: hemoglobin A1c; and kidney or liver function: albumin-serum, alanine aminotransferase, and creatinine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 376,463 decedents, 367,474 (97.6%) of whom were matched to non-decedents (similar age and sex). For each test, the proportion of non-decedents who received the test was stable over the 12-month observation period. A higher proportion of decedents had a laboratory test than non-decedents for all but the diabetes test. As decedents neared death, there was a gradual increase in test use until their final month of life, when test use dramatically increased. Across all laboratory tests, test values remained similar for non-decedents over the 12-month observation period. However, for decedents, there were differences in the magnitude and direction of the test values over the 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate distinct changes in decedents' laboratory test use and values over their last 12 months. Future work should explore whether laboratory tests could predict survival or improve the performance of mortality prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"73-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882211/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Canadian Coalition for Seniors' Mental Health Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD). 加拿大老年人心理健康联盟《评估和管理痴呆症行为和心理症状的加拿大临床实践指南》。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.820
Stacey Hatch, Dallas P Seitz, Marie-Andrée Bruneau, Vivian Ewa, Sid Feldman, Yael Goldberg, Zahra Goodarzi, Nathan Herrmann, Debbie Hewitt Colborne, Alexandre Henri-Bhargava, Zahinoor Ismail, Julia Kirkham, Sanjeev Kumar, Krista L Lanctôt, Wade Thompson, Jennifer Porter, Jennifer A Watt

In Canada, approximately 730,000 people are currently living with dementia. Over 75% will experience behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). There is a lack of consensus on best practices for the assessment and management of BPSD. In 2024, the Canadian Coalition for Seniors Mental Health (CCSMH) developed a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for assessing and managing BPSD, specifically for agitation, depression, anxiety, psychosis, and sexual expressions of potential risk, and deprescribing antipsychotics and psychotropic medications. Development of the BPSD CPG followed the Guideline International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development checklist. The guideline is intended for people living with dementia, caregivers of people living with dementia, and health-care providers in community, outpatient, inpatient, long-term care, and other residential care settings. Recommendations were informed by a Canada-wide prioritization exercise to identify CPG topics and preferred terms for describing BPSD. A systematic review of existing dementia CPGs, an overview of systematic reviews on assessing and managing BPSD, and systematic reviews of tools for measuring psychosis, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in people living with dementia was undertaken, along with a rapid review of studies of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for reducing sexual expressions of potential risk in people living with dementia. Guideline panel members voted on recommendation strength and quality of evidence, per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. This CPG resulted in 11 good practice statements and 63 guideline recommendations that will inform BPSD best practices in a Canadian health-care context.

在加拿大,目前大约有73万人患有痴呆症。超过75%的人会出现痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)。对评估和管理BPSD的最佳做法缺乏共识。2024年,加拿大老年人心理健康联盟(CCSMH)制定了一份临床实践指南(CPG),用于评估和管理BPSD,特别是躁动、抑郁、焦虑、精神病和潜在风险的性表达,以及减少抗精神病药物和精神药物的处方。BPSD CPG的开发遵循指南国际网络(GIN)-麦克马斯特指南开发清单。该指南适用于痴呆症患者、痴呆症患者的护理人员以及社区、门诊、住院、长期护理和其他住宿护理机构的卫生保健提供者。在加拿大范围内确定优先次序的工作为确定CPG主题和描述BPSD的首选术语提供了建议。对现有痴呆CPGs进行了系统回顾,对评估和管理BPSD进行了系统回顾,对痴呆患者精神病、焦虑和抑郁症状测量工具进行了系统回顾,同时对减少痴呆患者性表达潜在风险的药物和非药物干预研究进行了快速回顾。指南小组成员根据建议、评估、发展和评估方法的分级对建议的强度和证据的质量进行投票。该CPG产生了11项良好做法声明和63项指导建议,将为加拿大卫生保健领域的BPSD最佳做法提供信息。
{"title":"The Canadian Coalition for Seniors' Mental Health Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD).","authors":"Stacey Hatch, Dallas P Seitz, Marie-Andrée Bruneau, Vivian Ewa, Sid Feldman, Yael Goldberg, Zahra Goodarzi, Nathan Herrmann, Debbie Hewitt Colborne, Alexandre Henri-Bhargava, Zahinoor Ismail, Julia Kirkham, Sanjeev Kumar, Krista L Lanctôt, Wade Thompson, Jennifer Porter, Jennifer A Watt","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.820","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Canada, approximately 730,000 people are currently living with dementia. Over 75% will experience behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). There is a lack of consensus on best practices for the assessment and management of BPSD. In 2024, the Canadian Coalition for Seniors Mental Health (CCSMH) developed a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for assessing and managing BPSD, specifically for agitation, depression, anxiety, psychosis, and sexual expressions of potential risk, and deprescribing antipsychotics and psychotropic medications. Development of the BPSD CPG followed the Guideline International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development checklist. The guideline is intended for people living with dementia, caregivers of people living with dementia, and health-care providers in community, outpatient, inpatient, long-term care, and other residential care settings. Recommendations were informed by a Canada-wide prioritization exercise to identify CPG topics and preferred terms for describing BPSD. A systematic review of existing dementia CPGs, an overview of systematic reviews on assessing and managing BPSD, and systematic reviews of tools for measuring psychosis, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in people living with dementia was undertaken, along with a rapid review of studies of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for reducing sexual expressions of potential risk in people living with dementia. Guideline panel members voted on recommendation strength and quality of evidence, per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. This CPG resulted in 11 good practice statements and 63 guideline recommendations that will inform BPSD best practices in a Canadian health-care context.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"91-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882202/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Cognition Remotely: Expanding the Reach of Cognitive Testing for Older Adults at Risk for Dementia in a Randomized Controlled Trial. 远程认知评估:在一项随机对照试验中扩大认知测试对老年痴呆风险的影响。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.790
Aidan Steeves, Karla Faig, Chris McGibbon, Andrew Sexton, Pamela Jarrett

Little is known about whether cognitive assessments can be completed remotely by older adults at risk for dementia, and there is no consensus on which tool is best. The SYNchronising Exercises, Remedies in GaIt and Cognition at Home (SYNERGIC@Home) study evaluated the feasibility of a home-based, double-blind, randomized-controlled trial to improve gait and cognition in individuals at risk for dementia. This paper reports a secondary analytic outcome of the cognitive tests used. The three aims were: 1) to examine whether the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA 8.1 Audiovisual), Cognitive-Functional Composite2 (CFC2), and Telephone Cognitive Screen (T-CogS) could be administered remotely; 2) to compare each tool; 3) to evaluate changes in cognition following the intervention. Sixty participants were randomized to one of four physical/cognitive exercise intervention arms, with 52 participants completing the intervention. Cognitive tests were done in the homes of participants via Zoom for Healthcare™. All 52 participants completed the assessments. The interquartile range (IQR) for the MoCA was 4, the CFC2 was 8, and the T-CogS was 1. At baseline, 11.5% scored perfectly on the MoCA, 0% scored perfectly on the CFC2, and 62% scored perfectly on the T-CogS. Scores on the MoCA (p=.076), CFC2 (p=.053), and T-CogS (p=.281) were not statistically significantly different from baseline to post-intervention. This study demonstrates that these cognitive tests can be administered remotely, with the MoCA and the CFC2 being the most sensitive to variability in scores.

对于认知评估是否可以由有痴呆风险的老年人远程完成,我们知之甚少,而且对于哪种工具是最好的也没有达成共识。同步运动、步态和认知补救在家(SYNERGIC@Home)研究评估了一项基于家庭的、双盲的、随机对照试验的可行性,以改善痴呆风险个体的步态和认知。本文报告了所使用的认知测试的二次分析结果。三个目的是:1)检验蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA 8.1 Audiovisual)、认知功能复合测试(CFC2)和电话认知屏幕(T-CogS)是否可以远程管理;2)对各工具进行比较;3)评估干预后认知的变化。60名参与者被随机分为四个身体/认知运动干预组,其中52名参与者完成了干预。认知测试通过Zoom for Healthcare™在参与者家中完成。所有52名参与者都完成了评估。MoCA的四分位间距(IQR)为4,CFC2为8,T-CogS为1。在基线时,11.5%的人在MoCA上得分完美,0%的人在CFC2上得分完美,62%的人在T-CogS上得分完美。MoCA评分(p= 0.076)、CFC2评分(p= 0.053)、T-CogS评分(p= 0.281)与干预后比较差异无统计学意义。这项研究表明,这些认知测试可以远程进行,MoCA和CFC2对分数的变化最敏感。
{"title":"Assessing Cognition Remotely: Expanding the Reach of Cognitive Testing for Older Adults at Risk for Dementia in a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Aidan Steeves, Karla Faig, Chris McGibbon, Andrew Sexton, Pamela Jarrett","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.790","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about whether cognitive assessments can be completed remotely by older adults at risk for dementia, and there is no consensus on which tool is best. The SYNchronising Exercises, Remedies in GaIt and Cognition at Home (SYNERGIC@Home) study evaluated the feasibility of a home-based, double-blind, randomized-controlled trial to improve gait and cognition in individuals at risk for dementia. This paper reports a secondary analytic outcome of the cognitive tests used. The three aims were: 1) to examine whether the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA 8.1 Audiovisual), Cognitive-Functional Composite2 (CFC2), and Telephone Cognitive Screen (T-CogS) could be administered remotely; 2) to compare each tool; 3) to evaluate changes in cognition following the intervention. Sixty participants were randomized to one of four physical/cognitive exercise intervention arms, with 52 participants completing the intervention. Cognitive tests were done in the homes of participants via Zoom for Healthcare™. All 52 participants completed the assessments. The interquartile range (IQR) for the MoCA was 4, the CFC2 was 8, and the T-CogS was 1. At baseline, 11.5% scored perfectly on the MoCA, 0% scored perfectly on the CFC2, and 62% scored perfectly on the T-CogS. Scores on the MoCA (<i>p</i>=.076), CFC2 (<i>p</i>=.053), and T-CogS (<i>p</i>=.281) were not statistically significantly different from baseline to post-intervention. This study demonstrates that these cognitive tests can be administered remotely, with the MoCA and the CFC2 being the most sensitive to variability in scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"87-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882207/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding Local Consultation Patterns of Inpatient Geriatric Medicine Teams: a Cross-Sectional Study. 了解老年住院医疗小组的地方会诊模式:一项横断面研究。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.28.768
Krista M Reich, Jennifer Watt, Bing Li, Jason Jiang, Zahra Goodarzi

Background: Geriatric consultation for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) improves outcomes of older adults living with frailty who are hospitalized, but consultation patterns and utilization of inpatient geriatric consultation teams by other hospital-based services are poorly understood.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using linked health administrative data to describe characteristics of older adults (≥ 65 years) who received a CGA while hospitalized between January 1, and December 31, 2019. We identified hospital-based services requesting CGA and the frequency and reasons for referral. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the association between patient-level characteristics and receiving a CGA.

Results: A total of 29,090 older adults were admitted to hospital; 38.7% were classified as frail and 5.4% (1,563 patients) received at least one CGA. The top three reasons for requesting a CGA were to assess the need for care on an inpatient geriatric rehabilitation unit (43%), and for assessment and management of delirium (27%) and dementia (24%). Referrals were most frequently received from Hospitalists (48%). Frailty was associated with increased odds of receiving a CGA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.67-14.82). A diagnosis of cancer was associated with lower odds of receiving a CGA (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.93).

Conclusions: Inpatient geriatric consultation teams support 5.4% of hospitalized older adults. With the rapidly growing aging population, future efforts are needed to explore the optimal delivery of inpatient geriatric services to support its sustainable provision.

背景:老年综合评估的老年咨询(CGA)改善了住院的虚弱老年人的预后,但其他医院基础服务的咨询模式和住院老年咨询团队的利用尚不清楚。方法:我们使用相关的健康管理数据进行了一项横断面研究,以描述2019年1月1日至12月31日住院期间接受CGA的老年人(≥65岁)的特征。我们确定了需要CGA的医院服务以及转诊的频率和原因。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来估计患者水平特征与接受CGA之间的关系。结果:共有29,090名老年人住院;38.7%被归类为虚弱,5.4%(1,563例)接受了至少一次CGA。要求CGA的前三个原因是评估住院老年康复病房的护理需求(43%),评估和管理谵妄(27%)和痴呆(24%)。转诊最多的是医院医生(48%)。虚弱与接受CGA的几率增加相关(调整优势比[aOR] 12.02;95%置信区间[CI] 9.67-14.82)。癌症诊断与较低的接受CGA的几率相关(aOR 0.75;95% ci 0.60-0.93)。结论:住院老年会诊团队支持5.4%的住院老年人。随着老龄化人口的迅速增长,未来需要努力探索老年住院服务的最佳提供方式,以支持其可持续提供。
{"title":"Understanding Local Consultation Patterns of Inpatient Geriatric Medicine Teams: a Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Krista M Reich, Jennifer Watt, Bing Li, Jason Jiang, Zahra Goodarzi","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.768","DOIUrl":"10.5770/cgj.28.768","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric consultation for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) improves outcomes of older adults living with frailty who are hospitalized, but consultation patterns and utilization of inpatient geriatric consultation teams by other hospital-based services are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using linked health administrative data to describe characteristics of older adults (≥ 65 years) who received a CGA while hospitalized between January 1, and December 31, 2019. We identified hospital-based services requesting CGA and the frequency and reasons for referral. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the association between patient-level characteristics and receiving a CGA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,090 older adults were admitted to hospital; 38.7% were classified as frail and 5.4% (1,563 patients) received at least one CGA. The top three reasons for requesting a CGA were to assess the need for care on an inpatient geriatric rehabilitation unit (43%), and for assessment and management of delirium (27%) and dementia (24%). Referrals were most frequently received from Hospitalists (48%). Frailty was associated with increased odds of receiving a CGA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.67-14.82). A diagnosis of cancer was associated with lower odds of receiving a CGA (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inpatient geriatric consultation teams support 5.4% of hospitalized older adults. With the rapidly growing aging population, future efforts are needed to explore the optimal delivery of inpatient geriatric services to support its sustainable provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"41-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882203/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143574741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Priorities of Older Adults in Managing Urinary Incontinence: a Patient-Oriented Research Approach. 探索老年人尿失禁管理的优先事项:一种以患者为导向的研究方法。
IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.27.758
Marina Kirillovich, Saima Rajabali, Adrian Wagg

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI), the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine, has a substantial impact on the quality of life of older adults. Most UI research is driven by researchers and lacks the patient perspective. The goal of this qualitative study was to gain the perspective of older adults in formulating a research agenda tailored to address their questions and improve their experience with managing UI.

Methods: Implementing a community-based participatory research framework, an advisory group of eight older adults with UI were recruited to be on the research team. An initial focus group was conducted to learn about their research needs. Nominal Group Technique was used to reach saturation of themes and data was analyzed thematically. Employing a Delphi consensus method, a national online questionnaire containing 20 priorities for future UI research and education was developed in collaboration with the advisory group.

Results: 59 older adults with UI rated each priority on a Likert scale. Priorities which advanced to the second round were re-rated, with an 85% response rate. 11 priorities of ≥80% agreement were retained. The highest rated priorities included relationship between physical activity and UI; support for those with UI; causes of UI and its management; sleep and UI; and public restroom accessibility.

Conclusions: Findings from this study will help researchers and health-care professionals understand and address the needs of older adults with UI. Efforts should be made to translate research findings in this area and disseminate them in a medium accessible to older adults.

导读:尿失禁(UI)是一种不自觉的尿漏,对老年人的生活质量有很大的影响。大多数UI研究都是由研究人员推动的,缺乏患者的视角。本定性研究的目的是获得老年人在制定研究议程时的观点,以解决他们的问题并改善他们管理UI的经验。方法:实施以社区为基础的参与性研究框架,招募了一个由8名老年UI患者组成的咨询小组加入研究小组。最初的焦点小组是为了了解他们的研究需求。采用标称组技术达到主题饱和,并对数据进行主题分析。采用德尔菲共识法,与咨询小组合作制定了一份全国在线问卷,其中包含未来UI研究和教育的20个优先事项。结果:59名老年UI患者在李克特量表上对每个优先级进行评分。进入第二轮的优先级被重新排序,回复率为85%。一致性≥80%的11个优先级被保留。排名最高的优先事项包括身体活动与UI之间的关系;支持那些与UI;尿失禁的原因及管理;睡眠和用户界面;以及公共厕所的便利性。结论:本研究的发现将有助于研究人员和卫生保健专业人员了解和解决老年UI患者的需求。应努力翻译这方面的研究结果,并以老年人可以使用的媒介加以传播。
{"title":"Exploring the Priorities of Older Adults in Managing Urinary Incontinence: a Patient-Oriented Research Approach.","authors":"Marina Kirillovich, Saima Rajabali, Adrian Wagg","doi":"10.5770/cgj.27.758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.27.758","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urinary incontinence (UI), the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine, has a substantial impact on the quality of life of older adults. Most UI research is driven by researchers and lacks the patient perspective. The goal of this qualitative study was to gain the perspective of older adults in formulating a research agenda tailored to address their questions and improve their experience with managing UI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementing a community-based participatory research framework, an advisory group of eight older adults with UI were recruited to be on the research team. An initial focus group was conducted to learn about their research needs. Nominal Group Technique was used to reach saturation of themes and data was analyzed thematically. Employing a Delphi consensus method, a national online questionnaire containing 20 priorities for future UI research and education was developed in collaboration with the advisory group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>59 older adults with UI rated each priority on a Likert scale. Priorities which advanced to the second round were re-rated, with an 85% response rate. 11 priorities of ≥80% agreement were retained. The highest rated priorities included relationship between physical activity and UI; support for those with UI; causes of UI and its management; sleep and UI; and public restroom accessibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from this study will help researchers and health-care professionals understand and address the needs of older adults with UI. Efforts should be made to translate research findings in this area and disseminate them in a medium accessible to older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"27 4","pages":"473-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583892/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1