Johanna Wagenius, Sophia Ehrström, Karin Källén, Jan Baekelandt, Andrea Stuart
Introduction: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is a technique combining vaginal entrance to the abdomen with endoscopic overview. Previous studies have shown that vNOTES decreases operating time, hospitalization, postoperative complications, and pain. We aimed to present patient demographics, costs, and surgical outcomes following the implementation of vNOTES for benign hysterectomies in Sweden.
Material and methods: We conducted a historical cohort study with the first vNOTES hysterectomies in Sweden 2021-2023 involving 8 hospitals. Data was extracted from the Swedish National Quality Register for Gynecological Surgery (GynOp). Our main outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, costs, and patient satisfaction. As a secondary objective, the odds ratios (OR) for any intraoperative or postoperative complication, respectively, were computed for BMI ≥30 versus <30, and for uterus weight ≥500 g versus <500 g.
Results: A total of 545 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 49.9 ± 10.7 years. Of the included patients, 8.1% (n = 44) were nullipara, 19.3% (n = 105) had a BMI ≥30, 17.4% (n = 95) had a previous cesarean section, and 16.7% (n = 91) had other previous abdominal surgery. The median uterus weight was 148 g (interquartile range, IQR 86-299). The median surgical time was 65 minutes (IQR 48-91), and the median blood loss was 40 mL (IQR 25-90). Conversions to laparotomy occurred in 2% (n = 11), and reoperations occurred in 0.6% (n = 3) of the cases. The total intraoperative complication rate was 2.2% and the total postoperative complication rate was 8.4%. No significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative complications were found between BMI ≥30 and <30 and between uterus weight ≥500 and <500 g. Most of the patients (57.1%, n = 311) left the hospital the same day as the surgery. The 1-year follow-up after surgery showed that 90% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result.
Conclusions: The implementation of vNOTES hysterectomies in Sweden has been safe showing similar complication rates compared to studies of other minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques. Surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, and conversions were in analogy with previous observational vNOTES studies. The 1-year follow-up after surgery showed high patient satisfaction.
{"title":"National implementation of vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for benign hysterectomies: A historical cohort study of Swedish data 2021-2023.","authors":"Johanna Wagenius, Sophia Ehrström, Karin Källén, Jan Baekelandt, Andrea Stuart","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is a technique combining vaginal entrance to the abdomen with endoscopic overview. Previous studies have shown that vNOTES decreases operating time, hospitalization, postoperative complications, and pain. We aimed to present patient demographics, costs, and surgical outcomes following the implementation of vNOTES for benign hysterectomies in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a historical cohort study with the first vNOTES hysterectomies in Sweden 2021-2023 involving 8 hospitals. Data was extracted from the Swedish National Quality Register for Gynecological Surgery (GynOp). Our main outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, costs, and patient satisfaction. As a secondary objective, the odds ratios (OR) for any intraoperative or postoperative complication, respectively, were computed for BMI ≥30 versus <30, and for uterus weight ≥500 g versus <500 g.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 545 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 49.9 ± 10.7 years. Of the included patients, 8.1% (n = 44) were nullipara, 19.3% (n = 105) had a BMI ≥30, 17.4% (n = 95) had a previous cesarean section, and 16.7% (n = 91) had other previous abdominal surgery. The median uterus weight was 148 g (interquartile range, IQR 86-299). The median surgical time was 65 minutes (IQR 48-91), and the median blood loss was 40 mL (IQR 25-90). Conversions to laparotomy occurred in 2% (n = 11), and reoperations occurred in 0.6% (n = 3) of the cases. The total intraoperative complication rate was 2.2% and the total postoperative complication rate was 8.4%. No significant differences in intraoperative and postoperative complications were found between BMI ≥30 and <30 and between uterus weight ≥500 and <500 g. Most of the patients (57.1%, n = 311) left the hospital the same day as the surgery. The 1-year follow-up after surgery showed that 90% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of vNOTES hysterectomies in Sweden has been safe showing similar complication rates compared to studies of other minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques. Surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, and conversions were in analogy with previous observational vNOTES studies. The 1-year follow-up after surgery showed high patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145964712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lise Qvirin Krogh, Lea Kirstine Hansen, Rikke Bek Helmig, Iben Sundtoft, Aiste Kloster, Axel Forman, Niels Ulbjerg, Julie Glavind
Introduction: Laparoscopic cervical cerclage is an intervention for the prevention of preterm birth, for example, in women with a weak cervix due to prior cervical surgery or prior failed vaginal cerclage. Little is known about pregnancy outcomes when a cerclage is left in situ across consecutive pregnancies; this study aims to investigate neonatal outcomes following laparoscopic cervical cerclage placement in first and subsequent pregnancies and to compare pre- and postconception placement of the laparoscopic cervical cerclage on neonatal survival.
Material and methods: We performed an observational study in women who had a laparoscopic cervical cerclage at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between 2011 and 2021. Data on the timing of the procedure (pre- vs post-conception), surgical complications, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes were collected from electronic patient records and analyzed descriptively. The primary outcome was neonatal survival. Secondary outcomes were neonatal survival without major morbidity, preterm birth, and gestational age at birth.
Results: A total of 170 women had a laparoscopic cervical cerclage during the study period. Uterine wall perforation occurred in 10/170 procedures (6%), postoperative infection in 4/170 (2%), and 125/170 (74%) were discharged on the same day as the procedure. There were 145 women with at least one subsequent pregnancy and 229 registered pregnancies in total. In the 185 pregnancies that progressed beyond 20 weeks, 166/181 (92%) delivered ≥34 weeks of gestation. Neonatal survival was 183/186 (98%), and survival without major morbidity was 181/186 (97%). Neonatal outcomes were similar between women with a cerclage placed pre- or postconception. Fifty of 145 women (34%) with a cerclage left in situ had more than one pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation. These repeated pregnancies showed consistently favorable outcomes, with neonatal survival rates of 100% in second pregnancies (44/44) and 100% in third pregnancies (4/4).
Conclusions: Laparoscopic cervical cerclage supports favorable neonatal outcomes in first and subsequent pregnancies. Neonatal outcomes did not appear to differ based on whether the cerclage was placed pre- or postconception. Pregnancies in which the cerclage was left in situ demonstrated high neonatal survival rates and favorable obstetric outcomes in both second and third pregnancies.
{"title":"Laparoscopic cervical cerclage and pregnancy outcomes in consecutive pregnancies: An observational study.","authors":"Lise Qvirin Krogh, Lea Kirstine Hansen, Rikke Bek Helmig, Iben Sundtoft, Aiste Kloster, Axel Forman, Niels Ulbjerg, Julie Glavind","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic cervical cerclage is an intervention for the prevention of preterm birth, for example, in women with a weak cervix due to prior cervical surgery or prior failed vaginal cerclage. Little is known about pregnancy outcomes when a cerclage is left in situ across consecutive pregnancies; this study aims to investigate neonatal outcomes following laparoscopic cervical cerclage placement in first and subsequent pregnancies and to compare pre- and postconception placement of the laparoscopic cervical cerclage on neonatal survival.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We performed an observational study in women who had a laparoscopic cervical cerclage at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between 2011 and 2021. Data on the timing of the procedure (pre- vs post-conception), surgical complications, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes were collected from electronic patient records and analyzed descriptively. The primary outcome was neonatal survival. Secondary outcomes were neonatal survival without major morbidity, preterm birth, and gestational age at birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 170 women had a laparoscopic cervical cerclage during the study period. Uterine wall perforation occurred in 10/170 procedures (6%), postoperative infection in 4/170 (2%), and 125/170 (74%) were discharged on the same day as the procedure. There were 145 women with at least one subsequent pregnancy and 229 registered pregnancies in total. In the 185 pregnancies that progressed beyond 20 weeks, 166/181 (92%) delivered ≥34 weeks of gestation. Neonatal survival was 183/186 (98%), and survival without major morbidity was 181/186 (97%). Neonatal outcomes were similar between women with a cerclage placed pre- or postconception. Fifty of 145 women (34%) with a cerclage left in situ had more than one pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation. These repeated pregnancies showed consistently favorable outcomes, with neonatal survival rates of 100% in second pregnancies (44/44) and 100% in third pregnancies (4/4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic cervical cerclage supports favorable neonatal outcomes in first and subsequent pregnancies. Neonatal outcomes did not appear to differ based on whether the cerclage was placed pre- or postconception. Pregnancies in which the cerclage was left in situ demonstrated high neonatal survival rates and favorable obstetric outcomes in both second and third pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145958249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
While existing literature has compared the methodological strengths and limitations of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) in general medical research, two critical gaps remain unaddressed: (1) no prior communication papers have specifically examined this comparison in the context of maternity care where unique ethical and practical considerations exist, and (2) no studies have systematically compared cost-effectiveness analyses derived from RCTs versus RWD approaches-a crucial dimension for value-based maternity care decisions. This article examines how both approaches can strengthen the evidence base and support the delivery of value-based maternity care. We argue that neither RCTs nor RWD should be regarded as inherently superior in guiding decision-making. Each study design offers valuable insights, and their findings must be critically appraised in light of methodological rigor, context, and relevance, particularly when their results diverge.
{"title":"Beyond evidence hierarchies: Leveraging randomized controlled trials and real-world data to advance the value of maternity care.","authors":"Yanan Hu, Valerie Slavin, Joanne Enticott, Emily Callander","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While existing literature has compared the methodological strengths and limitations of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) in general medical research, two critical gaps remain unaddressed: (1) no prior communication papers have specifically examined this comparison in the context of maternity care where unique ethical and practical considerations exist, and (2) no studies have systematically compared cost-effectiveness analyses derived from RCTs versus RWD approaches-a crucial dimension for value-based maternity care decisions. This article examines how both approaches can strengthen the evidence base and support the delivery of value-based maternity care. We argue that neither RCTs nor RWD should be regarded as inherently superior in guiding decision-making. Each study design offers valuable insights, and their findings must be critically appraised in light of methodological rigor, context, and relevance, particularly when their results diverge.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145942063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eline E R Lust, Kim Bronsgeest, Lidewij Henneman, Neeltje M T H Crombag, Caterina M Bilardo, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Esther Sikkel, Audrey B C Coumans, Ayten Elvan-Taşpınar, Sander Galjaard, Attie T J I Go, Gwendolyn T R Manten, Eva Pajkrt, Elisabeth van Leeuwen, Monique C Haak, Mireille N Bekker
Introduction: A frequently cited benefit of the first-trimester anomaly scan (FTAS) is that it reduces psychological impact by enabling earlier termination of pregnancy (TOP). However, the impact of early versus late TOP due to fetal anomalies remains unclear. This study evaluates the psychological impact and perspectives associated with early versus late TOP.
Material and methods: A prospective mixed methods study was conducted. The early group (TOP <18 weeks) included women with an abnormal FTAS; the late group (TOP 20-24 weeks) included women with an abnormal second-trimester scan (SAS), abnormal FTAS, or normal FTAS followed by abnormal SAS. Women completed questionnaires 2 (T1) and 6 months (T2) postpartum addressing psychological impact using validated scales (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Edinburgh Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, Perinatal Grief Scale) and study-specific questions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women and their partners 3-6 months after termination.
Results: 149 women with early TOP (15 + 2 weeks, range 14 + 4-16 + 1) and 129 with late TOP (22 + 0, 21 + 0-23 + 1) completed T1. In both groups, the majority had clinically relevant anxiety at T1 and T2 and moderate/severe distress at T1. The late TOP group had higher median depression and mean grief scores at T1 (5.0, range 3.0-8.0 vs. 4.0, range 2.0-7.0, p = 0.004) (85.9 ± 21.0 vs. 76.5 ± 22.4, p < 0.001) and at T2 (4.0, 1.0-7.0 vs. 3.0, 1.0-6.0, p = 0.043) (81.3 ± 22.9 vs. 70.8 ± 22.6, p < 0.001), respectively, and higher mean distress scores at T1 (33.8 ± 13.3 vs. 30.2 ± 14.7, p = 0.034). Of 51 interviews with women and partners (22 early, 29 late TOP), four themes were identified: fetal attachment, time pressure, grief, and reflections on gestational age. Most late TOP participants expressed strong fetal attachment; for early TOP participants, the experiences were more variable. Half of the late TOP participants reported time pressure due to the legal limit. Perceived grief and impact were substantial in both groups.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that early TOP is associated with lower psychological impact compared to late TOP, mainly in the first months postpartum. This may reflect less intense fetal attachment and more time for reproductive decision-making for some parents, supporting the presumed benefit of earlier intervention. Nevertheless, TOP causes a significant emotional impact at any gestational age.
{"title":"Early versus late termination for fetal anomalies: Women's perspectives and psychological impact in a mixed methods study.","authors":"Eline E R Lust, Kim Bronsgeest, Lidewij Henneman, Neeltje M T H Crombag, Caterina M Bilardo, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Esther Sikkel, Audrey B C Coumans, Ayten Elvan-Taşpınar, Sander Galjaard, Attie T J I Go, Gwendolyn T R Manten, Eva Pajkrt, Elisabeth van Leeuwen, Monique C Haak, Mireille N Bekker","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A frequently cited benefit of the first-trimester anomaly scan (FTAS) is that it reduces psychological impact by enabling earlier termination of pregnancy (TOP). However, the impact of early versus late TOP due to fetal anomalies remains unclear. This study evaluates the psychological impact and perspectives associated with early versus late TOP.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective mixed methods study was conducted. The early group (TOP <18 weeks) included women with an abnormal FTAS; the late group (TOP 20-24 weeks) included women with an abnormal second-trimester scan (SAS), abnormal FTAS, or normal FTAS followed by abnormal SAS. Women completed questionnaires 2 (T1) and 6 months (T2) postpartum addressing psychological impact using validated scales (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Edinburgh Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, Perinatal Grief Scale) and study-specific questions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women and their partners 3-6 months after termination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>149 women with early TOP (15 + 2 weeks, range 14 + 4-16 + 1) and 129 with late TOP (22 + 0, 21 + 0-23 + 1) completed T1. In both groups, the majority had clinically relevant anxiety at T1 and T2 and moderate/severe distress at T1. The late TOP group had higher median depression and mean grief scores at T1 (5.0, range 3.0-8.0 vs. 4.0, range 2.0-7.0, p = 0.004) (85.9 ± 21.0 vs. 76.5 ± 22.4, p < 0.001) and at T2 (4.0, 1.0-7.0 vs. 3.0, 1.0-6.0, p = 0.043) (81.3 ± 22.9 vs. 70.8 ± 22.6, p < 0.001), respectively, and higher mean distress scores at T1 (33.8 ± 13.3 vs. 30.2 ± 14.7, p = 0.034). Of 51 interviews with women and partners (22 early, 29 late TOP), four themes were identified: fetal attachment, time pressure, grief, and reflections on gestational age. Most late TOP participants expressed strong fetal attachment; for early TOP participants, the experiences were more variable. Half of the late TOP participants reported time pressure due to the legal limit. Perceived grief and impact were substantial in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that early TOP is associated with lower psychological impact compared to late TOP, mainly in the first months postpartum. This may reflect less intense fetal attachment and more time for reproductive decision-making for some parents, supporting the presumed benefit of earlier intervention. Nevertheless, TOP causes a significant emotional impact at any gestational age.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Greta Lisa Carlin, Christina Tanja Grech, Wolfgang Umek, Engelbert Hanzal, Marianne Koch, Barbara Bodner-Adler
Mid-urethral slings (MUS) such as tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) are the established gold standard surgical approach for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI). While generally effective, complications such as bladder injury, urinary retention, and bleeding can occur. This article focuses on a rare but significant complication: postoperative hemorrhage into the retropubic space (Cavum Retzii) following MUS/TVT placement. Key challenges, diagnostic options, and management strategies for this condition are assessed. Additionally, a structured clinical guideline to support a systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment of complications is provided.
{"title":"Retropubic hemorrhage following Midurethral sling surgery: Diagnosis, clinical challenges, and management.","authors":"Greta Lisa Carlin, Christina Tanja Grech, Wolfgang Umek, Engelbert Hanzal, Marianne Koch, Barbara Bodner-Adler","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mid-urethral slings (MUS) such as tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) are the established gold standard surgical approach for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI). While generally effective, complications such as bladder injury, urinary retention, and bleeding can occur. This article focuses on a rare but significant complication: postoperative hemorrhage into the retropubic space (Cavum Retzii) following MUS/TVT placement. Key challenges, diagnostic options, and management strategies for this condition are assessed. Additionally, a structured clinical guideline to support a systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment of complications is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dina O. Eriksen, Louise Krog, Eva B. Ostenfeld, Pernille T. Jensen, Kathrine D. Lycke, Therese K. Grønborg, Nicolas Wentzensen, Megan A. Clarke, Anne Hammer