{"title":"Research on the Economic Effects of China's Integrated Circuit Industry from the Perspective of Input-Output","authors":"艳娟 戴, 鸿 李","doi":"10.26599/peo.2023.9310104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2023.9310104","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 集成电路产业在以互联网为代表的信息时代起着决定性作用,已凸显成为我国最重要的战略产业之一。本文编制了集成电路产业投入产出表,通过投入产出表的各类系数来分析我国集成电路的产业关联和波及效应。结果表明:(1)我国集成电路产业作为中间投入品与电子元器件、计算机、通信设备等制造业联系最为密切,产业整体对经济的拉动能力较强,且不易受到其他行业的影响,但集成电路材料部门对经济拉动能力明显低于其他部门,集成电路封装测试部门对经济的推动程度最高;(2)集成电路产业整体属于“出口依赖型”产业且进口依赖出口需求,分部门来看集成电路材料、制造、封装测试部门的生产和出口诱发依存特征符合产业整体趋势,集成电路设备、设计部门属于“投资依赖型”产业且进口依赖投资需求;(3)集成电路产业及其5个子部门的生产诱发系数:出口>投资,进口诱发系数的结论恰好相反。最后本文从实际角度提出增加社会资本注入、构建良好产业生态环境、加强与台湾台积电等企业的联系以及在封装测试业实现定点突破等建议;从投入产出的角度提出加强上下游协同关联、以集成电路封装测试业和制造业为产业核心、加大集成电路产业“引进来”和“走出去”对外开放力度等建议。\u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73612408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A New Proposition: The Direct Proportional Relationship between Intrinsic Labor Complexity and Economic Growth","authors":"忠任 张","doi":"10.26599/peo.2023.9310102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2023.9310102","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 本文在对大量文献分析的基础上,区分了复杂劳动与复杂劳动力的概念,用“学非所用”以及“算盘悖论”的现象的存在等例证了作为复杂劳动力支出的复杂劳动与复杂劳动力价值之间的关系并不满足充要条件。且认为在劳动生产率提高与单位商品价值量降低的相对运动之中,价值总量增长只有在期差意义下才可以解释(因为根据价值的历史使命,绝对的价值增长是社会退步的体现)。在外在的劳动复杂度呈现降低(去技能化)的趋势之下,却出现了教育培训费的增加,这种复杂的现象唯有用体现在人力资本作用的内在劳动复杂度才可以解释,使得我们需要对经济增长源泉重新认识。由此提出了一个新的命题:内在劳动复杂度与经济增长成正比。本文还在界定了复杂劳动度的理论含义之后,作为对在统计学上碍难理解的关于平均劳动就是简单劳动的马克思论断,尝试通过数学上的一个极限公式,用去技能化趋势下“平均劳动”会趋于简单劳动的倾向来予以解释。\u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91259061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.26599/peo.2023.9310108
Z. Liu, Lirong Zhang, Zeyu Zeng
Nowadays, as the development of science and technology promotes the continuous change of the force of production, data is becoming an increasingly important production factor that is deeply involved in the process of production, circulation, distribution and consumption in capitalist society. This study aims to explore the application of data in capitalist production and its implications. We analyzes the data from the labor process and the process of producing surplus value, from which it is concluded that the application of data in the general production process does not deviate from the category of the “ Labor Theory of Value”. In addition, we distinguish the performance of data in the four links of surplus value production, realization, distribution and redistribution, thereby illustrating the positive role of data in the capitalist economy. We also identify changes in the value composition caused by data.
{"title":"A Political Economics Analysis of Data Participation in Capitalism","authors":"Z. Liu, Lirong Zhang, Zeyu Zeng","doi":"10.26599/peo.2023.9310108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2023.9310108","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Nowadays, as the development of science and technology promotes the continuous change of the force of production, data is becoming an increasingly important production factor that is deeply involved in the process of production, circulation, distribution and consumption in capitalist society. This study aims to explore the application of data in capitalist production and its implications. We analyzes the data from the labor process and the process of producing surplus value, from which it is concluded that the application of data in the general production process does not deviate from the category of the “ Labor Theory of Value”. In addition, we distinguish the performance of data in the four links of surplus value production, realization, distribution and redistribution, thereby illustrating the positive role of data in the capitalist economy. We also identify changes in the value composition caused by data. \u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75391335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.26599/peo.2023.9310107
B. Gao, Lan Zhu
At present, the Chinese manufacturing industry's competitive advantage is facing multiple challenges. China's “hexagon diagram” industrial policy, which has promoted the competitive advantage of Chinese companies in the era of globalization, encompasses these six strategies: enhancing factor supply, building infrastructure, improving institutional environments, enlarging market size, promoting industrial clustering, and encouraging competition. The hexagon model of industrial policy has gained China entry into many industries and increased their competitive advantage by lowering production cost and creating full-scope value chains. Lately, this competitive advantage is facing significant challenges from globalization reversal, trade wars, and the technological revolution. Relative to anti-globalization and trade wars, however, the most profound challenge facing China's manufacturing industry is the rise of the Industrial Internet of Things and smart manufacturing. China needs to upgrade its hexagon diagram industrial policy to keep up with new developments in the Industrial Internet of Things in today's era of smart manufacturing.
{"title":"The Industrial Internet of Things: A Competitive Advantage in the Era of Smart Manufacturing","authors":"B. Gao, Lan Zhu","doi":"10.26599/peo.2023.9310107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2023.9310107","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 At present, the Chinese manufacturing industry's competitive advantage is facing multiple challenges. China's “hexagon diagram” industrial policy, which has promoted the competitive advantage of Chinese companies in the era of globalization, encompasses these six strategies: enhancing factor supply, building infrastructure, improving institutional environments, enlarging market size, promoting industrial clustering, and encouraging competition. The hexagon model of industrial policy has gained China entry into many industries and increased their competitive advantage by lowering production cost and creating full-scope value chains. Lately, this competitive advantage is facing significant challenges from globalization reversal, trade wars, and the technological revolution. Relative to anti-globalization and trade wars, however, the most profound challenge facing China's manufacturing industry is the rise of the Industrial Internet of Things and smart manufacturing. China needs to upgrade its hexagon diagram industrial policy to keep up with new developments in the Industrial Internet of Things in today's era of smart manufacturing. \u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81433032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On Solow-Cobb-Douglas Production Function and it's Relation with Marx's Value Theory of Labor —How to Derive Solow-Cobb-Douglas Production Function from Value Theory of Labor","authors":"祚庥 何, 承瑞 庆","doi":"10.26599/peo.2023.9310106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2023.9310106","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 本文从对当代经济学中最常用的索罗—柯布—道格拉斯生产函数的分析入手,指出这一纯经验的数学函数是可以从马克思的劳动价值论的基本公式WJ=C+V+M推导出来的。为此,要将此公式中只包含人类体力劳动做功的价值扩展到将因科技进步以及市场和交易手段的进步引起的劳动生产率的增长定量地引入,在数学方法处理上采取合理的近似后,可以导出索罗—柯布—道格拉斯生产函数。特别是对索罗余值,也即全要素生产率的表达式,给出了多种因素的物理内容。作为一个初步探索,本文只给出了包含人力劳动以及市场和科技进步等因素共同合成的全要素劳动生产率,但完全可以引入包括外部因素在内的各种可能因素。\u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88310440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.26599/peo.2022.9310108
Bangxi Li, Yihan Zhao, Zhixuan Feng, Feng Zhao
This study constructs a theoretical framework for understanding the new development paradigm based on value circulation and the reproduction theory of Marx. According to these theories, the essence of economic circulation is value circulation, the core of which is mutual matching among the structures of technological, distribution, demand, and production. We adopted a three-sector reproduction model with fixed capital to understand different development paradigms under various combinations of the four aforementioned structures. On this basis, we use the 1957- 2017 input-output table to construct the three-sector tables and explain the logic of China's economic structure change and the characteristics of the resulting circulation patterns. We also compared the economic structures and circulation patterns of the United States and Japan with those of China to shed light on China's choice of future economic circulation patterns and the new development paradigms.
{"title":"Value Circulation, Economic Structure, and the New Development Paradigm: A Theoretical Framework of Political Economy and International Comparison","authors":"Bangxi Li, Yihan Zhao, Zhixuan Feng, Feng Zhao","doi":"10.26599/peo.2022.9310108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2022.9310108","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This study constructs a theoretical framework for understanding the new development paradigm based on value circulation and the reproduction theory of Marx. According to these theories, the essence of economic circulation is value circulation, the core of which is mutual matching among the structures of technological, distribution, demand, and production. We adopted a three-sector reproduction model with fixed capital to understand different development paradigms under various combinations of the four aforementioned structures. On this basis, we use the 1957- 2017 input-output table to construct the three-sector tables and explain the logic of China's economic structure change and the characteristics of the resulting circulation patterns. We also compared the economic structures and circulation patterns of the United States and Japan with those of China to shed light on China's choice of future economic circulation patterns and the new development paradigms. \u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79184430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Sraffa in the History of Economic Thought: Production Costs in Neoclassical Theory","authors":"波特伦 谢弗德, 宏 姜","doi":"10.26599/peo.2022.9310105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2022.9310105","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 在20世纪20年代,斯拉法对马歇尔经济学进行了一场著名的批判。斯拉法的文章和罗宾逊夫人以及张伯伦的著作掀起了一轮不完全竞争分析的潮流。本文聚焦于斯拉法对马歇尔经济学中生产理论的批判。第一,本文回顾了斯拉法文章的背景,包括经济学的方法论争论。第二,本文重点分析了斯拉法如何在逻辑上拆解了马歇尔经济学。斯拉法的文章从规模收益规律和完全竞争条件的分析入手,揭示了新古典主义经济理论的错误。第三,通过对斯拉法文章的分析,我们可以看到那些通向《用商品生产商品》——日后斯拉法最重要作品——的思想萌芽。\u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76230882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Some Comments on Abroad Study of Transformation Problem","authors":"兆梓 荣, 旸 陈","doi":"10.26599/peo.2022.9310106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2022.9310106","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 20世纪80年代,弗里和杜梅尼尔等人提出劳动价值论“新解释”。近40年来,国外马克思主义的转形问题研究沿着“新解释”路径推进,产生了一些新观点、新流派。克莱曼和麦克高伦等人的“跨期单一体系”和莫斯里的“宏观货币解释”都是这一理论动向的产物。可惜此类研究大多沿着“新解释”混淆价格与生产价格的错误方向推进,对问题的解决并没有太多贡献。本文从C体系的视角出发回顾近期国外转形问题研究的若干成果。\u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87268946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Lewis Transition of China's Urbanization: Historical Positioning, Realization Form and Universal Significance","authors":"垠 吴, 明铠 王","doi":"10.26599/peo.2022.9310102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2022.9310102","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 新中国成立一百年时将实现中华民族伟大复兴的梦想,城镇化无疑是实现这一中国梦的重要篇章。选择什么样的城镇化道路,将最终决定中国城镇化发展的结果。这条城镇化道路应当而且必然是中国特色的新型城镇化道路。中国特色新型城镇化道路是以中国国情为背景,经过较长时间探索实践形成的一条既考虑中国自然社会历史条件,又借鉴国外城镇化成功经验的现实路径。它既不是完全自然历史形成的,也不是模仿国外某类城镇化道路而形成的固有模式。中国当前的城镇化道路正经历刘易斯转折期的考验,这对发展中国家跨越城镇化的刘易斯转折期的实践而言,既是一个巨大的社会实验观察室,也是一本富含城镇化建设多样性和复杂性的教科书。本文提出中国克服城镇化的刘易斯转折从1.0到5.0版本的城镇化实现形式,并指出中国求解城镇化刘易斯转折期矛盾的方案完全可为其他国家提供借鉴。\u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82254243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"New Development in the Labor Theory of Value under Joint Production: Discussion on the Keys and Fallacies of “Steedman's Puzzle”","authors":"忠任 张","doi":"10.26599/peo.2022.9310103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26599/peo.2022.9310103","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 在马克思主义经济学研究中,联合生产问题之所以引人注目,最初是因为斯蒂德曼于1975年提出在联合生产的条件下会出现正的利润与负的剩余价值并存的现象,即所谓的“斯蒂德曼之谜”,并用来作为否定劳动价值论的武器,产生了极其不良的国际影响。本文表明,只要把联合生产最初的产品-生产过程模式变更为部门-部门模式,就能够克服斯拉法分析方法的局限性,由此可以阐明联合生产方法与马克思主义经济学是兼容的,不仅不存在矛盾,而且可以用来分析资源约束条件下的经济增长问题,并可以通过完善负价值的概念,运用劳动价值论来解释环境污染问题与被污染环境的修复问题。本文还构筑了联合生产下的价值决定模型以及联合生产下价值向生产价格转形模型,并给出这两种模型存在唯一正解的条件,从而彻底破解“斯蒂德曼之谜”所提出的诘难。本文不仅拓展了劳动价值论的研究手段,而且丰富了劳动价值论的应用范围。\u0000","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86281870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：