首页 > 最新文献

Academic Emergency Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
The heartbeat of acute care 急症护理的核心
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15021
Antonio Yaghy

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

利益冲突声明作者声明没有利益冲突。
{"title":"The heartbeat of acute care","authors":"Antonio Yaghy","doi":"10.1111/acem.15021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15021","url":null,"abstract":"<h2> CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT</h2>\u0000<p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142247653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Discharge instruction comprehension by older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis 急诊科老年人对出院指导的理解:系统回顾与荟萃分析
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15013
Adrian D. Haimovich, Sydney Mulqueen, Jossie Carreras‐Tartak, Cameron Gettel, Mara A. Schonberg, Susan N. Hastings, Christopher Carpenter, Shan W. Liu, Stephen H. Thomas
IntroductionOlder adults are at high risk of adverse health outcomes in the post–emergency department (ED) discharge period. Prior work has shown that discharged older adults have variable understanding of their discharge instructions which may contribute to these outcomes. To identify discharge comprehension gaps amenable to future interventions, we utilize meta‐analysis to determine patient comprehension across five domains of discharge instructions: diagnosis, medications, self‐care, routine follow‐up, and return precautions.MethodsUsing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines, two reviewers sourced evidence from databases including Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar (for gray literature). Publications or preprints appearing before April 2024 were included if they focused on geriatric ED discharge instructions and reported a proportion of patients with comprehension of at least one of five predefined discharge components. Meta‐analysis of eligible studies for each component was executed using random‐effects modeling to describe the proportion of geriatric ED cases understanding the discharge instructions; where appropriate we calculated pooled estimates, reported as percentages with 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsOf initial records returned (N = 2898), exclusions based on title or abstract assessment left 51 studies for full‐text review; of these, seven constituted the study set. Acceptable heterogeneity and absence of indication of publication bias supported pooled estimates for proportions comprehending instructions on medications (41%, 95% CI 31%–50%, I2 = 43%), self‐care (81%, 95% CI 76%–85%, I2 = 43%), and routine follow‐up (76%, 95% CI 72%–79%, I2 = 25%). Key findings included marked heterogeneity with respect to comprehending two discharge parameters: diagnosis (I2 = 73%) and return precautions (I2 = 95%).ConclusionsOlder patients discharged from the ED had greater comprehension of self‐care and follow‐up instructions than about their medications. These findings suggest that medication instructions may be a priority domain for future interventions.
导言:老年人在急诊科(ED)出院后很容易出现不良健康后果。先前的研究表明,出院的老年人对出院指导的理解程度不一,这可能会导致这些结果。为了找出患者在出院指导方面的理解差距,以便今后采取干预措施,我们利用荟萃分析法确定了患者在出院指导五个方面的理解情况:诊断、用药、自我护理、常规随访和返院注意事项。方法根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,两名审稿人从Medline (PubMed)、EMBASE、Web of Science、CINAHL和Google Scholar(灰色文献)等数据库中寻找证据。2024 年 4 月之前发表的文献或预印文献,如果关注老年急诊室出院指导,并报告了能够理解五项预定义出院内容中至少一项内容的患者比例,均可纳入。我们使用随机效应模型对每项内容的合格研究进行了元分析,以描述老年急诊室病例中理解出院指导的比例;在适当的情况下,我们计算了汇总估计值,以百分比和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的形式进行报告。结果在返回的初始记录(N = 2898)中,根据标题或摘要评估排除了 51 项研究,供全文审阅;其中 7 项构成了研究集。可接受的异质性和无发表偏倚迹象支持对理解药物说明比例(41%,95% CI 31%-50%,I2 = 43%)、自我护理比例(81%,95% CI 76%-85%,I2 = 43%)和常规随访比例(76%,95% CI 72%-79%,I2 = 25%)的汇总估计。主要发现包括在理解诊断(I2 = 73%)和返回注意事项(I2 = 95%)这两个出院参数方面存在明显的异质性。结论从急诊室出院的老年患者对自我护理和随访指导的理解程度高于对药物的理解程度。这些发现表明,用药指导可能是未来干预的优先领域。
{"title":"Discharge instruction comprehension by older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis","authors":"Adrian D. Haimovich, Sydney Mulqueen, Jossie Carreras‐Tartak, Cameron Gettel, Mara A. Schonberg, Susan N. Hastings, Christopher Carpenter, Shan W. Liu, Stephen H. Thomas","doi":"10.1111/acem.15013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15013","url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionOlder adults are at high risk of adverse health outcomes in the post–emergency department (ED) discharge period. Prior work has shown that discharged older adults have variable understanding of their discharge instructions which may contribute to these outcomes. To identify discharge comprehension gaps amenable to future interventions, we utilize meta‐analysis to determine patient comprehension across five domains of discharge instructions: diagnosis, medications, self‐care, routine follow‐up, and return precautions.MethodsUsing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines, two reviewers sourced evidence from databases including Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar (for gray literature). Publications or preprints appearing before April 2024 were included if they focused on geriatric ED discharge instructions and reported a proportion of patients with comprehension of at least one of five predefined discharge components. Meta‐analysis of eligible studies for each component was executed using random‐effects modeling to describe the proportion of geriatric ED cases understanding the discharge instructions; where appropriate we calculated pooled estimates, reported as percentages with 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsOf initial records returned (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 2898), exclusions based on title or abstract assessment left 51 studies for full‐text review; of these, seven constituted the study set. Acceptable heterogeneity and absence of indication of publication bias supported pooled estimates for proportions comprehending instructions on medications (41%, 95% CI 31%–50%, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 43%), self‐care (81%, 95% CI 76%–85%, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 43%), and routine follow‐up (76%, 95% CI 72%–79%, <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 25%). Key findings included marked heterogeneity with respect to comprehending two discharge parameters: diagnosis (<jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 73%) and return precautions (<jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 95%).ConclusionsOlder patients discharged from the ED had greater comprehension of self‐care and follow‐up instructions than about their medications. These findings suggest that medication instructions may be a priority domain for future interventions.","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142201035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterizing Spanish-speaking patients' patient-centered care experiences in the emergency department. 描述讲西班牙语的患者在急诊科接受以患者为中心的护理的经历。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15011
Rebecca J Schwei, Gabriella Geiger, Jenn Mirrielees, Alexandra Center, Alyana Enemuoh, Ashley Portillo Recinos, Franchesca Arias, Maichou Lor, Manish N Shah, Douglas Wiegmann, Michael S Pulia

Background: Patient-centered care (PCC) is an essential component of high-quality health, yet patients with non-English language preferences (NELP) experience worse PCC outcomes. Additionally, there are likely unique aspects to PCC for patients with NELP in the emergency department (ED). To inform the development of strategies to improve PCC for NELP in the ED, we sought to understand how Spanish-speaking ED patients experience care and the factors that influenced their perceptions of the patient-centeredness of that care.

Methods: We conducted a single-center qualitative study using semistructured interviews with adult, Spanish-speaking patients who had been discharged home from the ED. Interviews were conducted using an interview guide, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed iteratively in Spanish using inductive and deductive thematic analysis.

Results: We conducted 19 interviews with participants from 24 to 72 years old. Participants were born in seven different Spanish-speaking countries. Participants identified three domains of PCC: patient, medical team's skills, and system. Several of the identified themes such as shared decision making, open communication, compassionate care, and coordination of follow-up care are often incorporated into PCC definitions. However, other themes, including uncertainty leading to fear, use of professional interpreters to promote understanding, receiving equitable care, technical proficiency, and efficiency of care expand upon existing domains in PCC definitions.

Conclusions: We now have a more nuanced understanding of how Spanish-speaking patients with NELP experience PCC in the ED and what matters to them. Several of the themes identified in this analysis add details about what matters to patients within the domains of previous PCC definitions. This suggests that the conceptualization of PCC may vary based on the setting where care is provided and the population who is receiving this care. Future work should consider patient population and setting when conceptualizing PCC.

背景:以患者为中心的护理(PCC)是高质量医疗保健的重要组成部分,但非英语语言偏好(NELP)患者的 PCC 结果却较差。此外,急诊科(ED)中的非英语语言偏好患者的以患者为中心的护理可能有其独特之处。为了帮助制定改善急诊科非英语语言偏好者的患者照护中心的策略,我们试图了解讲西班牙语的急诊科患者是如何体验照护服务的,以及影响他们对照护服务是否以患者为中心的看法的因素:我们对从急诊室出院回家的讲西班牙语的成年患者进行了半结构化访谈,开展了一项单中心定性研究。访谈使用访谈指南进行,用西班牙语记录、转录并使用归纳和演绎主题分析法进行反复分析:我们对 24 至 72 岁的参与者进行了 19 次访谈。参与者出生在七个不同的西班牙语国家。参与者确定了 PCC 的三个领域:患者、医疗团队的技能和系统。共同决策、开放式沟通、富有同情心的护理和协调后续护理等几个已确定的主题经常被纳入 PCC 的定义中。然而,其他主题,包括导致恐惧的不确定性、使用专业翻译人员促进理解、接受公平护理、技术熟练程度和护理效率,则在 PCC 定义的现有领域基础上进行了扩展:我们现在对讲西班牙语的 NELP 患者在急诊室如何体验 PCC 以及对他们来说什么是最重要的有了更细致的了解。本次分析中确定的几个主题增加了以往 PCC 定义领域中对患者重要的细节。这表明,PCC 的概念化可能会根据提供护理的环境和接受护理的人群而有所不同。未来的工作应在对 PCC 进行概念化时考虑患者人群和环境。
{"title":"Characterizing Spanish-speaking patients' patient-centered care experiences in the emergency department.","authors":"Rebecca J Schwei, Gabriella Geiger, Jenn Mirrielees, Alexandra Center, Alyana Enemuoh, Ashley Portillo Recinos, Franchesca Arias, Maichou Lor, Manish N Shah, Douglas Wiegmann, Michael S Pulia","doi":"10.1111/acem.15011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-centered care (PCC) is an essential component of high-quality health, yet patients with non-English language preferences (NELP) experience worse PCC outcomes. Additionally, there are likely unique aspects to PCC for patients with NELP in the emergency department (ED). To inform the development of strategies to improve PCC for NELP in the ED, we sought to understand how Spanish-speaking ED patients experience care and the factors that influenced their perceptions of the patient-centeredness of that care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center qualitative study using semistructured interviews with adult, Spanish-speaking patients who had been discharged home from the ED. Interviews were conducted using an interview guide, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed iteratively in Spanish using inductive and deductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 19 interviews with participants from 24 to 72 years old. Participants were born in seven different Spanish-speaking countries. Participants identified three domains of PCC: patient, medical team's skills, and system. Several of the identified themes such as shared decision making, open communication, compassionate care, and coordination of follow-up care are often incorporated into PCC definitions. However, other themes, including uncertainty leading to fear, use of professional interpreters to promote understanding, receiving equitable care, technical proficiency, and efficiency of care expand upon existing domains in PCC definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We now have a more nuanced understanding of how Spanish-speaking patients with NELP experience PCC in the ED and what matters to them. Several of the themes identified in this analysis add details about what matters to patients within the domains of previous PCC definitions. This suggests that the conceptualization of PCC may vary based on the setting where care is provided and the population who is receiving this care. Future work should consider patient population and setting when conceptualizing PCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142152961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A little glitter goes a long way. 一点闪亮就能让人眼前一亮。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15016
Katherine L Cross
{"title":"A little glitter goes a long way.","authors":"Katherine L Cross","doi":"10.1111/acem.15016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142152960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long guidewire peripheral intravenous catheters in emergency departments for management of difficult intravenous access: A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. 急诊科使用长导丝外周静脉导管处理静脉通路困难问题:一项多中心、务实、随机对照试验。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15004
Hui Grace Xu, Amanda Corley, Emily R Young, Anna Doubrovsky, Robert S Ware, Clifford Afoakwah, Carrie Wang, Scott Stirling, Nicole Marsh

Background: A quarter of patients who present to emergency departments (EDs) have difficult intravenous access (DIVA), making it challenging for clinicians to successfully place a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC). Some literature suggests that guidewire PIVC improves first-insertion success rate.

Aim: The aim was to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a novel long PIVC (5.8 cm) with a retractable coiled guidewire (GW-PIVC) for patients with DIVA, compared with standard care PIVCs.

Methods: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted in two Australian EDs. Eligible participants were adults assessed as meeting DIVA criteria. Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio; stratified by hospital) to either GW-PIVC (long) or standard care group (short or long PIVC). The use of ultrasound was discretionary in the standard care group and was recommended in the GW-PIVC group due to the pragmatic design that was primarily testing the GW-PIVC rather than the ultrasound use. Primary outcome was first-insertion success and secondary outcomes included all-cause device failure, patient and staff satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. The analysis was intention to treat.

Results: A total of 446 participants were randomized and 409 received PIVCs. The use of GW-PIVC, compared with standard PIVC, had a lower first-insertion success rate (68% vs. 77%, odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.99, p < 0.05). There was no difference in PIVC failure (134.0 per 1000 catheter days [GW-PIVC] vs. 111.8 [standard PIVC] per 1000 catheter days, hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.72-1.95). Both participant (8/10 vs. 9/10, median difference [MD] -1.00, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.63) and clinician (8/10 vs. 10/10, MD -2.00, 95% CI -2.37 to -1.63) satisfaction was lower with GW-PIVCs compared with standard PIVCs. More nurses inserted standard PIVCs than GW-PIVCs (56.9% vs. 36.5%) and had less confidence in their ultrasound skills (28.0% vs. 46.6% self-claimed as advanced/expert users). The cost per participant of GW-PIVC insertions was 2.46 times greater than standard PIVC insertions ($AU80.24 vs. $AU32.57).

Conclusions: GW-PIVCs had significantly lower first-insertion success and non-significantly higher all-cause catheter failure. Additional training and device design familiar to clinicians are vital factors to enhance the likelihood of successful future implementation of GW-PIVCs.

背景:在急诊科(ED)就诊的患者中,有四分之一存在静脉通路困难(DIVA)问题,这使得临床医生在成功置入外周静脉导管(PIVC)时面临挑战。一些文献表明,导丝 PIVC 可提高首次插入成功率。目的:与标准护理 PIVC 相比,本研究旨在确定新型长 PIVC(5.8 厘米)与可伸缩盘绕导丝(GW-PIVC)对 DIVA 患者的临床和成本效益:在澳大利亚的两家急诊室开展了一项实用随机对照试验。符合条件的参与者均为经评估符合 DIVA 标准的成年人。参与者被随机分配(1:1 比例;按医院分层)到 GW-PIVC(长)或标准护理组(短或长 PIVC)。标准护理组可自行决定是否使用超声波,而 GW-PIVC 组则建议使用超声波,这是因为务实设计主要测试的是 GW-PIVC,而不是超声波的使用。主要结果是首次植入成功率,次要结果包括全因装置故障、患者和医护人员满意度以及成本效益。分析采用意向治疗:共有 446 名参与者接受了随机治疗,其中 409 人接受了 PIVC。与标准 PIVC 相比,使用 GW-PIVC 的首次插入成功率较低(68% 对 77%,赔率比 [OR] 0.65,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.43-0.99,P 结论:GW-PIVC 的首次插入成功率显著高于标准 PIVC:GW-PIVC的首次插入成功率明显较低,而全因导管失败率则明显较高。额外的培训和临床医生熟悉的设备设计是提高未来成功实施 GW-PIVC 的可能性的重要因素。
{"title":"Long guidewire peripheral intravenous catheters in emergency departments for management of difficult intravenous access: A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Hui Grace Xu, Amanda Corley, Emily R Young, Anna Doubrovsky, Robert S Ware, Clifford Afoakwah, Carrie Wang, Scott Stirling, Nicole Marsh","doi":"10.1111/acem.15004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A quarter of patients who present to emergency departments (EDs) have difficult intravenous access (DIVA), making it challenging for clinicians to successfully place a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC). Some literature suggests that guidewire PIVC improves first-insertion success rate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a novel long PIVC (5.8 cm) with a retractable coiled guidewire (GW-PIVC) for patients with DIVA, compared with standard care PIVCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted in two Australian EDs. Eligible participants were adults assessed as meeting DIVA criteria. Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio; stratified by hospital) to either GW-PIVC (long) or standard care group (short or long PIVC). The use of ultrasound was discretionary in the standard care group and was recommended in the GW-PIVC group due to the pragmatic design that was primarily testing the GW-PIVC rather than the ultrasound use. Primary outcome was first-insertion success and secondary outcomes included all-cause device failure, patient and staff satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. The analysis was intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 446 participants were randomized and 409 received PIVCs. The use of GW-PIVC, compared with standard PIVC, had a lower first-insertion success rate (68% vs. 77%, odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.99, p < 0.05). There was no difference in PIVC failure (134.0 per 1000 catheter days [GW-PIVC] vs. 111.8 [standard PIVC] per 1000 catheter days, hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.72-1.95). Both participant (8/10 vs. 9/10, median difference [MD] -1.00, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.63) and clinician (8/10 vs. 10/10, MD -2.00, 95% CI -2.37 to -1.63) satisfaction was lower with GW-PIVCs compared with standard PIVCs. More nurses inserted standard PIVCs than GW-PIVCs (56.9% vs. 36.5%) and had less confidence in their ultrasound skills (28.0% vs. 46.6% self-claimed as advanced/expert users). The cost per participant of GW-PIVC insertions was 2.46 times greater than standard PIVC insertions ($AU80.24 vs. $AU32.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GW-PIVCs had significantly lower first-insertion success and non-significantly higher all-cause catheter failure. Additional training and device design familiar to clinicians are vital factors to enhance the likelihood of successful future implementation of GW-PIVCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142152962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
December. 12月
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15015
Elane Kim
{"title":"December.","authors":"Elane Kim","doi":"10.1111/acem.15015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142138976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
My search for light. 我寻找光明
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15009
Reginald Barnes
{"title":"My search for light.","authors":"Reginald Barnes","doi":"10.1111/acem.15009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142124494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sex-specific high-sensitivity troponin T cut-points have similar safety but lower efficacy than overall cut-points in a multisite U.S. cohort. 在美国一个多地点队列中,性别特异性高敏肌钙蛋白 T 切点与总体切点相比,安全性相似,但疗效较低。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15014
Connor M Montgomery, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Brandon Allen, Robert Christenson, Troy Madsen, James McCord, Bryn Mumma, Tara Hashemian, Michael Supples, Jason Stopyra, R Gentry Wilkerson, Simon A Mahler

Background: Data comparing the performance of sex-specific to overall (non-sex-specific) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) cut-points for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are limited. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of sex-specific versus overall 99th percentile high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) cut-points.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the STOP-CP cohort, which prospectively enrolled emergency department patients ≥ 21 years old with symptoms suggestive of ACS without ST-elevation on initial electrocardiogram across eight U.S. sites (January 25, 2017-September 6, 2018). Participants with both 0- and 1-h hs-cTnT measures less than or equal to the 99th percentile (sex-specific 22 ng/L for males, 14 ng/L for females; overall 19 ng/L) were classified into the rule-out group. The safety outcome was adjudicated cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days. Efficacy was defined as the proportion classified to the rule-out group. McNemar's test and a generalized score statistic were used to compare rule-out and 30-day cardiac death or MI rates between strategies. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) index was used to further compare performance.

Results: This analysis included 1430 patients, of whom 45.8% (655/1430) were female; the mean ± SD age was 57.6 ± 12.8 years. At 30 days, cardiac death or MI occurred in 12.8% (183/1430). The rule-out rate was lower using sex-specific versus overall cut-points (70.6% [1010/1430] vs. 72.5% [1037/1430]; p = 0.003). Among rule-out patients, the 30-day cardiac death or MI rates were similar for sex-specific (2.4% [24/1010]) vs. overall (2.3% [24/1037]) strategies (p = 0.79). Among patients with cardiac death or MI, sex-specific versus overall cut-points correctly reclassified three females and incorrectly reclassified three males. The sex-specific strategy resulted in a net of 27 patients being incorrectly reclassified into the rule-in group. This led to an NRI of -2.2% (95% CI -5.1% to 0.8%).

Conclusions: Sex-specific hs-cTnT cut-points resulted in fewer patients being ruled out without an improvement in safety compared to the overall cut-point strategy.

背景:在诊断急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)时,比较性别特异性和整体(非性别特异性)高敏心肌肌钙蛋白(hs-cTn)切点的性能的数据很有限。本研究旨在比较性别特异性与总体第99百分位数高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T(hs-cTnT)切点的安全性和有效性:我们对 STOP-CP 队列进行了二次分析,该队列在美国 8 个地点前瞻性地招募了年龄≥ 21 岁、症状提示 ACS 且初始心电图无 ST 抬高的急诊科患者(2017 年 1 月 25 日至 2018 年 9 月 6 日)。0小时和1小时hs-cTnT测量值均小于或等于第99百分位数(性别特异性为男性22纳克/升,女性14纳克/升;总体19纳克/升)的参与者被归入排除组。安全性结果为 30 天内判定的心源性死亡或心肌梗死(MI)。疗效定义为归入排除组的比例。采用 McNemar 检验和广义记分统计来比较不同策略的排除率和 30 天的心脏死亡或心肌梗死率。净再分类改善(NRI)指数用于进一步比较绩效:本次分析共纳入 1430 名患者,其中 45.8%(655/1430)为女性;平均年龄(± SD)为 57.6±12.8 岁。在 30 天内,12.8% 的患者(183/1430)发生了心源性死亡或心肌梗死。使用性别特异性切点与总体切点相比,排除率更低(70.6% [1010/1430] vs. 72.5% [1037/1430];P = 0.003)。在被排除的患者中,采用性别特异性策略(2.4% [24/1010])与整体策略(2.3% [24/1037])的 30 天心脏死亡或心肌梗死率相似(p = 0.79)。在心源性死亡或心肌梗死患者中,性别特异性切点与整体切点相比,正确地重新分类了三名女性,错误地重新分类了三名男性。性别特异性策略净导致 27 名患者被错误地重新分类到规则入组。这导致NRI为-2.2%(95% CI -5.1%至0.8%):结论:与整体切点策略相比,性别特异性 hs-cTnT 切点减少了被排除的患者人数,但安全性却没有提高。
{"title":"Sex-specific high-sensitivity troponin T cut-points have similar safety but lower efficacy than overall cut-points in a multisite U.S. cohort.","authors":"Connor M Montgomery, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Brandon Allen, Robert Christenson, Troy Madsen, James McCord, Bryn Mumma, Tara Hashemian, Michael Supples, Jason Stopyra, R Gentry Wilkerson, Simon A Mahler","doi":"10.1111/acem.15014","DOIUrl":"10.1111/acem.15014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data comparing the performance of sex-specific to overall (non-sex-specific) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) cut-points for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are limited. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of sex-specific versus overall 99th percentile high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) cut-points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of the STOP-CP cohort, which prospectively enrolled emergency department patients ≥ 21 years old with symptoms suggestive of ACS without ST-elevation on initial electrocardiogram across eight U.S. sites (January 25, 2017-September 6, 2018). Participants with both 0- and 1-h hs-cTnT measures less than or equal to the 99th percentile (sex-specific 22 ng/L for males, 14 ng/L for females; overall 19 ng/L) were classified into the rule-out group. The safety outcome was adjudicated cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days. Efficacy was defined as the proportion classified to the rule-out group. McNemar's test and a generalized score statistic were used to compare rule-out and 30-day cardiac death or MI rates between strategies. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) index was used to further compare performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 1430 patients, of whom 45.8% (655/1430) were female; the mean ± SD age was 57.6 ± 12.8 years. At 30 days, cardiac death or MI occurred in 12.8% (183/1430). The rule-out rate was lower using sex-specific versus overall cut-points (70.6% [1010/1430] vs. 72.5% [1037/1430]; p = 0.003). Among rule-out patients, the 30-day cardiac death or MI rates were similar for sex-specific (2.4% [24/1010]) vs. overall (2.3% [24/1037]) strategies (p = 0.79). Among patients with cardiac death or MI, sex-specific versus overall cut-points correctly reclassified three females and incorrectly reclassified three males. The sex-specific strategy resulted in a net of 27 patients being incorrectly reclassified into the rule-in group. This led to an NRI of -2.2% (95% CI -5.1% to 0.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex-specific hs-cTnT cut-points resulted in fewer patients being ruled out without an improvement in safety compared to the overall cut-point strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142118752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Number needed to call in emergency care research: Postenrollment follow-up data from a multicenter prospective syncope study. 急救护理研究中需要呼叫的人数:一项多中心前瞻性晕厥研究的注册后随访数据。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15010
Wachira Wongtanasarasin, Daniel K Nishijima, Nancy Wood, John DeAngelis, Alan Storrow, Jonathan Schimmel, Nataly Beltre, Dana Sacco, Marc A Probst
{"title":"Number needed to call in emergency care research: Postenrollment follow-up data from a multicenter prospective syncope study.","authors":"Wachira Wongtanasarasin, Daniel K Nishijima, Nancy Wood, John DeAngelis, Alan Storrow, Jonathan Schimmel, Nataly Beltre, Dana Sacco, Marc A Probst","doi":"10.1111/acem.15010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142118683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An examination of the vacation behaviors of United States emergency physicians. 对美国急诊医生休假行为的调查。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI: 10.1111/acem.15005
Dave W Lu, D Mark Courtney, Christine A Sinsky, Hanhan Wang, Mickey T Trockel, Liselotte N Dyrbye, Lindsey E Carlasare, Colin P West, Tait D Shanafelt
{"title":"An examination of the vacation behaviors of United States emergency physicians.","authors":"Dave W Lu, D Mark Courtney, Christine A Sinsky, Hanhan Wang, Mickey T Trockel, Liselotte N Dyrbye, Lindsey E Carlasare, Colin P West, Tait D Shanafelt","doi":"10.1111/acem.15005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1