Stroke is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. It is known to induce gut dysbiosis, which can exacerbate brain injury by increasing systemic inflammation and disrupting the gut-brain axis. This study investigated the effects of probiotics on immunomodulation and brain regeneration in a post-stroke animal model, with a particular focus on gut-brain axis. In this study, Male Wistar rats were divided into three groups: Sham, Ischemia and Ischemia + Probiotic. Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by one-hour middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). The probiotic group received 109 CFU/ml probiotic solution via gavage for 14 days. After 14 days, behavioral outcomes and cerebral infarct volume were assessed. Molecular docking was performed to analyze the binding affinities of probiotic metabolites with TLR4 and FGFR2 which were further validated by RT-PCR gene expression analysis. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity was evaluated using zymography and oxidative stress was assessed by measuring malondialdehyde, total antioxidant capacity, and nitric oxide levels in the ischemic penumbra. According to the results, the probiotic group showed a significant reduction in infarct volume and improved behavioral deficits. Molecular analysis revealed that probiotics increased nitric oxide levels and total antioxidant capacity while decreasing malondialdehyde levels. Consistent with molecular docking, there was a significant increase in FGFR2 and TLR4 gene expression and matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity. These findings show probiotic supplementation reduces brain damage after stroke, likely via the modulation of FGFR2/TLR4 inflammatory pathway, which could originate from gut microenvironment dysregulation.
{"title":"Probiotic Supplementation Modulates FGFR2 and TLR4 Signaling and Attenuates Chronic Neuroinflammation in an Experimental Stroke Model","authors":"Reza Bayat, Zahra Rezvani, Shokouh Rahmatipour, Abolfazl Azami Tameh, Zeinab Vahidinia","doi":"10.1007/s11064-025-04649-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11064-025-04649-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stroke is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. It is known to induce gut dysbiosis, which can exacerbate brain injury by increasing systemic inflammation and disrupting the gut-brain axis. This study investigated the effects of probiotics on immunomodulation and brain regeneration in a post-stroke animal model, with a particular focus on gut-brain axis. In this study, Male Wistar rats were divided into three groups: Sham, Ischemia and Ischemia + Probiotic. Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by one-hour middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). The probiotic group received 10<sup>9</sup> CFU/ml probiotic solution via gavage for 14 days. After 14 days, behavioral outcomes and cerebral infarct volume were assessed. Molecular docking was performed to analyze the binding affinities of probiotic metabolites with TLR4 and FGFR2 which were further validated by RT-PCR gene expression analysis. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity was evaluated using zymography and oxidative stress was assessed by measuring malondialdehyde, total antioxidant capacity, and nitric oxide levels in the ischemic penumbra. According to the results, the probiotic group showed a significant reduction in infarct volume and improved behavioral deficits. Molecular analysis revealed that probiotics increased nitric oxide levels and total antioxidant capacity while decreasing malondialdehyde levels. Consistent with molecular docking, there was a significant increase in FGFR2 and TLR4 gene expression and matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity. These findings show probiotic supplementation reduces brain damage after stroke, likely via the modulation of FGFR2/TLR4 inflammatory pathway, which could originate from gut microenvironment dysregulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":719,"journal":{"name":"Neurochemical Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s11064-025-04654-x
Ana Laura Torres-Román, Alette Ortega-Gómez, Carolina Y. Reyes-Soto, Omar Emiliano Aparicio-Trejo, Belén Cuevas-López, Fernando E. García-Arroyo, Erika Ruíz-García, Juan A. Matus-Santos, Beatriz Ferrer, Michael Aschner, Gustavo Jardón, Tessy López-Goerne, Anayansi Molina-Hernández, Juan Carlos Tenorio-Monterrubio, Abel Santamaría
The endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA) and the related metabolite oleamide (ODA) have been demonstrated to possess anti-proliferative properties by recruiting apoptotic mechanisms in glioblastoma cells; however, the role of receptors other than the canonical cannabinoid receptors in their pattern of anti-proliferative mechanisms has been poorly investigated. Here, we evaluated the role of mitochondrial function and PPAR-γ membrane receptors in the anti-proliferative mechanisms induced by AEA and ODA in the glioblastoma cell lines C6 and RG2. Cell viability and lipid peroxidation assessments in both cell lines showed antiproliferative and pro-oxidant effects of the tested cannabinoids, respectively, compared to primary astrocyte cultures used as a non-tumor negative control. AEA and ODA also reduced mitochondrial membrane potential in C6, but not in RG2 cells, while impairing mitochondrial Complex I activity in C6. The PPAR-γ receptor antagonist GW9662 showed differential effects on the AEA- and ODA-induced loss of cell viability in both cell lines, as well as in mitochondrial membrane potential. The ontogenetic origin and metabolic differences between RG2 and C6 cell lines may establish differential responses evoked by endogenous cannabinoids and PPAR-γ receptor modulation. Combined, our results demonstrate that AEA and ODA modulate mitochondrial function in glioblastoma cells by inhibiting the activity of mitochondrial Complex 1, which in turn increases markers of oxidative damage and interferes with glioblastoma proliferation.
Graphical Abstract
The endocannabinoids AEA, and its related compound ODA, decrease cell viability and proliferation in C6 and RG2 glioblastoma cells by inducing mitochondrial stress. Depending on the phenotypic and metabolic features of the GB cell line, PPAR-γ receptor can induce anti-proliferative effects mediated by eCB. ODA and AEA exert different mechanisms depending on the cell line; in C6, lipoperoxidation, a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, and inhibition of mitochondrial complex I are predominant, while in RG2, sensitivity to PPAR-γ modulation and inhibition of mitochondrial complex I by ODA are more prominent.
{"title":"The Anti-proliferative Effects of Anandamide and Oleamide in Glioblastoma Cell Lines Recruit Mitochondrial and PPAR-γ Receptor Modulation","authors":"Ana Laura Torres-Román, Alette Ortega-Gómez, Carolina Y. Reyes-Soto, Omar Emiliano Aparicio-Trejo, Belén Cuevas-López, Fernando E. García-Arroyo, Erika Ruíz-García, Juan A. Matus-Santos, Beatriz Ferrer, Michael Aschner, Gustavo Jardón, Tessy López-Goerne, Anayansi Molina-Hernández, Juan Carlos Tenorio-Monterrubio, Abel Santamaría","doi":"10.1007/s11064-025-04654-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11064-025-04654-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA) and the related metabolite oleamide (ODA) have been demonstrated to possess anti-proliferative properties by recruiting apoptotic mechanisms in glioblastoma cells; however, the role of receptors other than the canonical cannabinoid receptors in their pattern of anti-proliferative mechanisms has been poorly investigated. Here, we evaluated the role of mitochondrial function and PPAR-γ membrane receptors in the anti-proliferative mechanisms induced by AEA and ODA in the glioblastoma cell lines C6 and RG2. Cell viability and lipid peroxidation assessments in both cell lines showed antiproliferative and pro-oxidant effects of the tested cannabinoids, respectively, compared to primary astrocyte cultures used as a non-tumor negative control. AEA and ODA also reduced mitochondrial membrane potential in C6, but not in RG2 cells, while impairing mitochondrial Complex I activity in C6. The PPAR-γ receptor antagonist GW9662 showed differential effects on the AEA- and ODA-induced loss of cell viability in both cell lines, as well as in mitochondrial membrane potential. The ontogenetic origin and metabolic differences between RG2 and C6 cell lines may establish differential responses evoked by endogenous cannabinoids and PPAR-γ receptor modulation. Combined, our results demonstrate that AEA and ODA modulate mitochondrial function in glioblastoma cells by inhibiting the activity of mitochondrial Complex 1, which in turn increases markers of oxidative damage and interferes with glioblastoma proliferation.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><p>The endocannabinoids AEA, and its related compound ODA, decrease cell viability and proliferation in C6 and RG2 glioblastoma cells by inducing mitochondrial stress. Depending on the phenotypic and metabolic features of the GB cell line, PPAR-γ receptor can induce anti-proliferative effects mediated by eCB. ODA and AEA exert different mechanisms depending on the cell line; in C6, lipoperoxidation, a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, and inhibition of mitochondrial complex I are predominant, while in RG2, sensitivity to PPAR-γ modulation and inhibition of mitochondrial complex I by ODA are more prominent.</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":719,"journal":{"name":"Neurochemical Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11064-025-04654-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1007/s11064-025-04643-0
Roberta Stefanelli, Caterina Spada, Alessandro Palma, Sonia Canterini, Maria Teresa Fiorenza
The molecular reprogramming of astrocyte gene expression induced by oxygen deprivation is one of the astrocyte-mediated neuroprotective processes relevant to neurodegenerative diseases and various brain injury conditions. The primary oxygen sensor that mediates eukaryotic cells’ adaptive response to changes in oxygen concentration is hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α). Therefore, the astrocyte neuroprotective ability triggered by the activation of HIF-1α downstream effectors has sparked interest in hypoxia mimetics-based treatment approaches as a means to induce adaptive responses without direct hypoxia exposure. Compared to similar studies that evaluated the effect of both oxygen and glucose deprivation for several hours, this study uncovers the reprogramming of astrocyte gene expression patterns after exposure to hypoxia alone for short and relatively long periods of time − 30 min for short-term (ST) and three hours for long-term (LT) hypoxia − as well as following 24 h of reoxygenation induced recovery (RIR). The transcriptional activation of a number of genes, including Pdk1, Mct4, Sirt1, Bcl2, Hsp70, and Sod2, ends rather rapidly, only lasting over the ST-hypoxia. Conversely, during LT-hypoxia, Glut1 and Vegf1 show elevated expression, which is likely due to a positive feedback loop in which secreted Vegf increases both its own and Glut1’s expression. Interestingly, the ST-hypoxia establishes long-lasting variations of gene expression that may be essential for generating an effective neuroprotective response. This is demonstrated by the fact that Mct4 expression continues to be raised during the 24-hour normoxia period that follows the ST-hypoxia, thereby aiding in metabolic adaptation. Therefore, it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that the length of transcriptional activation varies depending on the gene and is associated with the function of the encoded protein.
{"title":"The Molecular Signature of Astrocyte Response to Hypoxia Outlines the Metabolic and Cell Survival Mechanisms for Neuroprotection","authors":"Roberta Stefanelli, Caterina Spada, Alessandro Palma, Sonia Canterini, Maria Teresa Fiorenza","doi":"10.1007/s11064-025-04643-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11064-025-04643-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The molecular reprogramming of astrocyte gene expression induced by oxygen deprivation is one of the astrocyte-mediated neuroprotective processes relevant to neurodegenerative diseases and various brain injury conditions. The primary oxygen sensor that mediates eukaryotic cells’ adaptive response to changes in oxygen concentration is hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α). Therefore, the astrocyte neuroprotective ability triggered by the activation of HIF-1α downstream effectors has sparked interest in hypoxia mimetics-based treatment approaches as a means to induce adaptive responses without direct hypoxia exposure. Compared to similar studies that evaluated the effect of both oxygen and glucose deprivation for several hours, this study uncovers the reprogramming of astrocyte gene expression patterns after exposure to hypoxia alone for short and relatively long periods of time − 30 min for short-term (ST) and three hours for long-term (LT) hypoxia − as well as following 24 h of reoxygenation induced recovery (RIR). The transcriptional activation of a number of genes, including <i>Pdk1</i>, <i>Mct4</i>, <i>Sirt1</i>, <i>Bcl2</i>, <i>Hsp70</i>, and <i>Sod2</i>, ends rather rapidly, only lasting over the ST-hypoxia. Conversely, during LT-hypoxia, <i>Glut1</i> and <i>Vegf1</i> show elevated expression, which is likely due to a positive feedback loop in which secreted Vegf increases both its own and Glut1’s expression. Interestingly, the ST-hypoxia establishes long-lasting variations of gene expression that may be essential for generating an effective neuroprotective response. This is demonstrated by the fact that <i>Mct4</i> expression continues to be raised during the 24-hour normoxia period that follows the ST-hypoxia, thereby aiding in metabolic adaptation. Therefore, it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that the length of transcriptional activation varies depending on the gene and is associated with the function of the encoded protein.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":719,"journal":{"name":"Neurochemical Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145964596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}