Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery最新文献

Surgical approaches directed toward craniovertebral junction (CVJ) can be addressed to the ventral, dorsal, and lateral aspects through a variety of 360° surgical corridors Herein, we report features, advantages, and limits of the updated technical support in CVJ surgery in clinical setting and dissection laboratories enriched by our preliminary surgical results of the simultaneous application of O-arm intraoperative neuronavigation and imaging system along with the 3D-4K EX in TOA for the treatment of CVJ pathologies.In the past 4 years, eight patients harboring CVJ compressive pathologies underwent one-step combined anterior neurosurgical decompression and posterior instrumentation and fusion technique with the aid of exoscope and O-arm. In our equipped Cranio-Vertebral Junction Laboratory, we use fresh cadavers (and injected "head and neck" specimens) whose policy, protocols, and logistics have already been elucidated in previous works. Five fresh-frozen adult specimens were dissected adopting an FLA. In these specimens, a TOA was also performed, as well as a neuronavigation-assisted comparison between transoral and transnasal explorable distances.A complete decompression along with stable instrumentation and fusion of the CVJ was accomplished in all the cases at the maximum follow-up (mean: 25.3 months). In two cases, the O-arm navigation allowed the identification of residual compression that was not clearly visible using the microscope alone. In four cases, it was not possible to navigate C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi due to the angled projection unfitting with the neuronavigation optical system, so misleading the surgeon and strongly suggesting changing surgical strategy intraoperatively. In another case (case 4), it was possible to navigate and perform both C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi screwing, but the screw placement was suboptimal at the immediate postoperative radiological assessment. In this case, the hardware displacement occurred 2 months later requiring reoperation.

Pineal lesions represent less than 1% of all brain tumors (Villani et al., Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109:1-6, 2007). The abysmal location and critical neurovascular structures remain a surgical challenge, despite the advent of microneurosurgery. The classical wide surgical suboccipital craniotomy with the supracerebellar infratentorial approach, described by Sir Victor Horsley (Victor, Proc R Soc Med 3:77-78, 1910), is infamous for its considerable surgical morbidity and mortality. This was later upgraded microneurosurgically by Stein to improve surgical outcomes (Stein, J Neurosurg 35:197-202, 1971).Ruge et al. reported the first purely endoscopic fenestration of quadrigeminal arachnoid cysts via this corridor (Ruge et al., Neurosurgery 38:830-7, 1996). A cadaver-based anatomical study by Cardia et al. demonstrated the viability for endoscope-assisted techniques (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 2006;104(6 Suppl):409-14). However, the first purely endoscopic supracerebellar infratentorial (eSCIT) approach to a pineal cyst was performed in 2008 by Gore et al. (Gore PA et al., Neurosurgery 62:108-9, 2008).Unlike transventricular endoscopy, eSCIT approach poses no mechanical risk to the fornices and can be utilized irrespective of ventricular size. More vascular control and resultant reduction in uncontrolled hemorrhage improve the feasibility of attaining complete resection, especially around corners (Zaidi et al,, World Neurosurg 84, 2015). Gravity-dependent positioning and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion aid cerebellar relaxation, creating the ideal anatomical pathway. Also, angle of the straight sinus, tentorium, and tectal adherence can often influence the choice of approach; thus direct endoscopic visualization not only counteracts access to the engorged Galenic complex but also encourages sharp dissection of the arachnoid (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 104:409-14, 2006). These tactics help provide excellent illumination with magnification, making it less fatiguing for the surgeon (Broggi et al., Neurosurgery 67:159-65, 2010).The purely endoscopic approach thwarts the dreaded risk of air embolisms, via simple copious irrigation from a small burr hole (Shahinian and Ra, J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74:114-7, 2013). The tiny opening and closure are rapid to create, and the smaller wound decreases postoperative pain and morbidity. Recent literature supports its numerous advantages and favorable outcomes, making it a tough contender to traditional open methods.

Objective: Transcortical approaches using a spatula-based retraction system have traditionally been used for the microsurgical resection of deep-seated intraventricular and parenchymal brain tumors. Recently, transparent cylindrical or tubular retractors have been developed to provide a stable corridor to access deeper brain lesions and perform bimanual microsurgical resection. The flexible endoports minimize brain retraction injury during surgery and, along with the superior vision of endoscopes, offer several advantages over standard microsurgery. In this chapter, we describe the surgical technique of the endoport-guided endoscopic excision of deep-seated intraaxial brain tumors.

Methods: The endoscopic endoport technique that we use at our institution for the surgical management of intraventricular and intraparenchymal brain tumors has been described in detail with illustrative cases.

Results: Results from the literature review of intraventricular and intraparenchymal port surgery were analyzed, and the feasibility and safety of this technique were discussed. Surgical complication avoidance and management were highlighted. The port technique offers numerous potential advantages, including (1) reducing focal brain injury by distributing retraction forces homogenously, (2) minimizing white matter disruption and the risk of fascicle injury during cannulation, (3) ensuring the stability of the surgical corridor during the procedure, (4) preventing inadvertent expansion of the corticectomy and white fiber tract dissection throughout surgery, and (5) protecting the surrounding tissues against iatrogenic injuries caused by instrument entry and reentry.

Conclusion: The endoport-assisted endoscopic technique is safe and offers an effective alternative option for the resection of intraventricular and intraparenchymal lesions.

Pediatric epilepsy has a worldwide prevalence of approximately 1% (Berg et al., Handb Clin Neurol 111:391-398, 2013) and is associated with not only lower quality of life but also long-term deficits in executive function, significant psychosocial stressors, poor cognitive outcomes, and developmental delays (Schraegle and Titus, Epilepsy Behav 62:20-26, 2016; Puka and Smith, Epilepsia 56:873-881, 2015). With approximately one-third of patients resistant to medical control, surgical intervention can offer a cure or palliation to decrease the disease burden and improve neurological development. Despite its potential, epilepsy surgery is drastically underutilized. Even today only 1% of the millions of epilepsy patients are referred annually for neurosurgical evaluation, and the average delay between diagnosis of Drug Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) and surgical intervention is approximately 20 years in adults and 5 years in children (Solli et al., Epilepsia 61:1352-1364, 2020). It is still estimated that only one-third of surgical candidates undergo operative intervention (Pestana Knight et al., Epilepsia 56:375, 2015). In contrast to the stable to declining rates of adult epilepsy surgery (Englot et al., Neurology 78:1200-1206, 2012; Neligan et al., Epilepsia 54:e62-e65, 2013), rates of pediatric surgery are rising (Pestana Knight et al., Epilepsia 56:375, 2015). Innovations in surgical approaches to epilepsy not only minimize potential complications but also expand the definition of a surgical candidate. In this chapter, three alternatives to classical resection are presented. First, laser ablation provides a minimally invasive approach to focal lesions. Next, both central and peripheral nervous system stimulation can interrupt seizure networks without creating permanent lesions. Lastly, focused ultrasound is discussed as a potential new avenue not only for ablation but also modulation of small, deep foci within seizure networks. A better understanding of the potential surgical options can guide patients and providers to explore all treatment avenues.

Background: Anterior cranial base meningiomas include those meningiomas originating from the tuberculum sellae, the planum sphenoidale, or the olfactory groove, with surgical excision being the main treatment modality for these tumors. Conventional microscopic and endoscope-assisted versions of the supraorbital keyhole approach via an eyebrow incision emerged into minimally invasive options that are frequently utilized nowadays for treating these tumors. At the early attempts of endoscope-assisted cranial surgery, it was noted that rigid endoscopes enabled overcoming the problem of suboptimal visualization when small exposures are used. The technical specifications and design of the currently available rigid endoscopes are associated with a group of unique features that define the endoscopic view and lay the basis for its superiority over the microscopic view during brain surgery. Notwithstanding, the fully endoscopic or endoscope-controlled version of the supraorbital keyhole approach is not routinely practiced by neurosurgeons, with few series published so far. In this chapter we elaborate on the surgical technique and nuances of the fully endoscopic supraorbital approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas.

Methods: From a prospective database of endoscopic procedures maintained by the senior author, clinical data, imaging studies, operative charts, and videos of cases undergoing fully endoscopic excision of anterior cranial base meningiomas via supraorbital approach were retrieved and analyzed. The pertinent literature was also reviewed.

Results: The surgical technique of the fully endoscopic supraorbital approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas was formulated.

Conclusion: The fully endoscopic supraorbital approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas has many advantages over the conventional procedures. In our hands, the technique has proven to be feasible, efficient, and minimally invasive with excellent results.

The complexity of intracranial anatomy and pathologies warrants the optimization of multimodal techniques to ensure safe and effective surgical treatment. Endoscopy is being more widely implemented in intracranial procedures as an important visualization tool, as it can offer panoramic views of deep structures while reducing the invasiveness of approaches. Fluorophores are frequently utilized to augment the identification of intracranial anatomic landmarks and pathologies. This chapter discusses the integration of these two surgical adjuncts, highlighting the key fluorophores used in endoscopic neurosurgery and their clinical applications.

Ependymomas comprise biologically distinct tumor types with respect to age distribution, (epi)genetics, localization, and prognosis. Multimodal risk-stratification, including histopathological and molecular features, is essential in these biologically defined tumor types. Gross total resection (GTR), achieved with intraoperative monitoring and neuronavigation, and if necessary, second-look surgery, is the most effective treatment. Adjuvant radiation therapy is mandatory in high-risk tumors and in case of residual tumor. There is yet growing evidence that some ependymal tumors may be cured by surgery alone. To date, the role of chemotherapy is unclear and subject of current studies.Even though standard therapy can achieve reasonable survival rates for the majority of ependymoma patients, long-term follow-up still reveals a high probability of relapse in certain biological entities.With increasing knowledge of biologically distinct tumor types, risk-adapted adjuvant therapy gains importance. Beyond initial tumor control, and avoidance of therapy-induced morbidity for low-risk patients, intensified treatment for high-risk patients comprises another challenge. With identification of specific risk features regarding molecular alterations, targeted therapy may represent an option for individualized treatment modalities in the future.

Objective: Endoscopic surgery has emerged in the recent years as an alternative to the conventional microsurgical approaches for removal of the deep-seated brain and intraventricular tumors. Endoport has enhanced the tumor access and visualization without any significant brain retraction. In this chapter, we describe the surgical technique of the endoscopic excision of the deep-seated intra-axial brain tumors using tubular retraction system with review of the literature.

Methods: The endoscopic endoport technique that we use at our institution for the surgical management of intraventricular and intraparenchymal brain tumors has been described in details with illustrations.

Results: Results from the literature review of brain parenchymal and intraventricular port surgery were analyzed, and the feasibility and safety of this technique were discussed. Surgical complication avoidance and management were highlighted. The port technique offers numerous potential advantages, including: (1) reducing focal brain injury by distributing retraction forces homogenously; (2) minimizing white matter disruption and the risk of fascicles injury during cannulation; (3) ensuring stability of the surgical corridor during the procedure; (4) preventing inadvertent expansion of the corticectomy and white fiber tract dissection throughout surgery; (5) protecting the surrounding tissues against iatrogenic injuries caused by instrument entry and reentry.

Conclusion: The endoport-assisted endoscopic technique is a safe and minimally invasive method that offers an effective alternative option for resection of intraventricular and parenchymal brain lesions. Excellent outcome comparable to other surgical approaches can be achieved with acceptable complications.

Background: Fully endoscopic or endoscope-controlled approaches are essentially keyhole approaches in which rigid endoscopes are the sole visualization tools used during the whole procedure. At the early attempts of endoscope-assisted cranial surgery, it was noted that rigid endoscopes enabled overcoming the problem of suboptimal visualization when small exposures are used. The technical specifications and design of the currently available rigid endoscopes are associated with a group of unique features that define the endoscopic view and lay the basis for its superiority over the microscopic view during brain surgery. Fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine angle tumors is a minimally invasive approach that is not routinely practiced by neurosurgeons, with few series published so far. Unfamiliarity with the technique, steep learning curve, and concerns about inadequate exposure, neurovascular injury, and decreased visibility may explain this fact. In this chapter we elaborate on the surgical technique and nuances of the fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach and present an overview of the published series.

Methods: From a prospective database of endoscopic procedures maintained by the senior author, clinical data, imaging studies, operative charts, and videos of cases undergoing fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine angle tumors were retrieved and analyzed. The pertinent literature was also reviewed.

Results: The surgical technique of the fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach was formulated.

Conclusion: The endoscopic technique has many advantages over the conventional procedures. In our hands, the technique has proven to be feasible, efficient, and minimally invasive with excellent results.

Neurosurgical procedures are some of the most complex procedures in medicine and since the advent of the field, planning, performing, and learning them has challenged the neurosurgeon. Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are making these challenges more manageable. VR refers to a virtual digital environment that can be experienced usually through use of stereoscopic glasses and controllers. AR, on the other hand, fuses the natural environment with virtual images, such as superimposing a preoperative MRI image on to the surgical field [1]. They initially were used primarily as neuronavigational tools but soon their potential in other areas of surgery, such as planning, education, and assessment, was noted and explored. Through this chapter, we outline the history and evolution of these two technologies over the past few decades, describe the current state of the technology and its uses, and postulate future directions for research and implementation.