Pub Date : 2023-07-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100050
Shannon W. Finks, Edward Van Matre, William Budd, Elizabeth Lemley, N. Katherine Ray, Madeline Mahon, Erin Chambers, A. Lloyd Finks
Cycle threshold (CT) refers to the number of cycles in a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay needed to amplify viral RNA and can be used to indicate viral load. CT is inversely related to viral load, where lower CT values indicate higher viral levels. Data suggest lower CT scores are associated with worse outcomes in COVID; however, quantitative CT scores are not typically reported to patients. This retrospective analysis examined the use of CT scores in patient counseling for positive COVID results and suggests that higher viral loads were associated with greater need for prescription drug therapy in the outpatient setting. Patient perception of CT score was found to influence masking and quarantine behavior. We hypothesize that a quantitative threshold for viral load such as CT can be useful in patient counseling, estimating need for drug therapy, and influencing behavior toward public health concerns.
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Quantitative Viral Load in Patients Positive for SARS-CoV-2","authors":"Shannon W. Finks, Edward Van Matre, William Budd, Elizabeth Lemley, N. Katherine Ray, Madeline Mahon, Erin Chambers, A. Lloyd Finks","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100050","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100050","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cycle threshold (CT) refers to the number of cycles in a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay needed to amplify viral RNA and can be used to indicate viral load. CT is inversely related to viral load, where lower CT values indicate higher viral levels. Data suggest lower CT scores are associated with worse outcomes in COVID; however, quantitative CT scores are not typically reported to patients. This retrospective analysis examined the use of CT scores in patient counseling for positive COVID results and suggests that higher viral loads were associated with greater need for prescription drug therapy in the outpatient setting. Patient perception of CT score was found to influence masking and quarantine behavior. We hypothesize that a quantitative threshold for viral load such as CT can be useful in patient counseling, estimating need for drug therapy, and influencing behavior toward public health concerns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43692669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100048
Claudia See , Kevin M. Wheelock , César Caraballo , Rohan Khera , Amarnath Annapureddy , Shiwani Mahajan , Yuan Lu , Harlan M. Krumholz , Karthik Murugiah
Background
Studies show that digoxin use is declining but is still prevalent. Recent data on digoxin prescription and characteristics of digoxin prescribers are unknown, which can help understand its contemporary use.
Methods
Using Medicare Part D data from 2013 to 2019, we studied the change in number and proportion of digoxin prescriptions and digoxin prescribers, overall and by specialty. Using logistic regression, we identified prescriber characteristics associated with digoxin prescription.
Results
From 2013 to 2019, total digoxin prescriptions (4.6 to 1.8 million) and proportion of digoxin prescribers decreased (9.1% to 4.3% overall; 26.6% to 11.8% among General Medicine prescribers and 65.4% to 48.9% among Cardiology). Of digoxin prescribers from 2013 practicing in 2019 (91.2% remained active), 59.1% did not prescribe digoxin at all, 31.7% reduced, and 9.2% maintained or increased prescriptions. The proportion of all digoxin prescriptions that were prescribed by General Medicine prescribers declined from 59.7% to 48.2% and increased for Cardiology (29% to 38.5%). Among new prescribers in 2019 (N = 85,508), only 1.9% prescribed digoxin. Digoxin prescribers when compared to non–digoxin prescribers were more likely male, graduated from medical school earlier, were located in the Midwest or South, and belonged to Cardiology (all P < .001).
Conclusions
Digoxin prescriptions continue to decline with over half of 2013 prescribers no longer prescribing digoxin in 2019. This may be a result of the increasing availability of newer heart failure therapies. The decline in digoxin prescription was greater among general medicine physicians than cardiologists, suggesting a change in digoxin use to a medication prescribed increasingly by specialists.
{"title":"Patterns of Digoxin Prescribing for Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States 2013-2019","authors":"Claudia See , Kevin M. Wheelock , César Caraballo , Rohan Khera , Amarnath Annapureddy , Shiwani Mahajan , Yuan Lu , Harlan M. Krumholz , Karthik Murugiah","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100048","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100048","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies show that digoxin use is declining but is still prevalent. Recent data on digoxin prescription and characteristics of digoxin prescribers are unknown, which can help understand its contemporary use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using Medicare Part D data from 2013 to 2019, we studied the change in number and proportion of digoxin prescriptions and digoxin prescribers, overall and by specialty. Using logistic regression, we identified prescriber characteristics associated with digoxin prescription.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2013 to 2019, total digoxin prescriptions (4.6 to 1.8 million) and proportion of digoxin prescribers decreased (9.1% to 4.3% overall; 26.6% to 11.8% among General Medicine prescribers and 65.4% to 48.9% among Cardiology). Of digoxin prescribers from 2013 practicing in 2019 (91.2% remained active), 59.1% did not prescribe digoxin at all, 31.7% reduced, and 9.2% maintained or increased prescriptions. The proportion of all digoxin prescriptions that were prescribed by General Medicine prescribers declined from 59.7% to 48.2% and increased for Cardiology (29% to 38.5%). Among new prescribers in 2019 (<em>N</em> = 85,508), only 1.9% prescribed digoxin. Digoxin prescribers when compared to non–digoxin prescribers were more likely male, graduated from medical school earlier, were located in the Midwest or South, and belonged to Cardiology (all <em>P</em> < .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Digoxin prescriptions continue to decline with over half of 2013 prescribers no longer prescribing digoxin in 2019. This may be a result of the increasing availability of newer heart failure therapies. The decline in digoxin prescription was greater among general medicine physicians than cardiologists, suggesting a change in digoxin use to a medication prescribed increasingly by specialists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42025200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100049
Rosnah Ismail , Noor Hassim Ismail , Zaleha Md Isa , Azmi Mohd Tamil , Mohd Hasni Ja'afar , Nafiza Mat Nasir , Suraya Abdul-Razak , Najihah Zainol Abidin , Nurul Hafiza Ab Razak , Philip Joseph , Khairul Hazdi Yusof
Background
Although prehypertension and hypertension can be detected at the primary healthcare level and low-cost treatments can effectively control its complications, hypertension is still the world's leading preventable risk factor. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine its prevalence and its risk factors among Malaysian adults.
Methods
A cross-sectional study involving 7585 adults was performed covering the rural and urban areas. Respondents with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 120-139 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 80-89 mmHg were categorized as prehypertensive, and hypertensive categorization was used for respondents with an SBP of ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP of ≥90 mmHg.
Results
Respondents reported to have prehypertension and hypertension were 40.7% and 38.0%, respectively. Those residing in a rural area, older age, male, family history of hypertension, and overweight or obese were associated with higher odds of prehypertension and hypertension. Unique to hypertension, the factors included low educational level (AOR: 1.349; 95% CI: 1.146, 1.588), unemployment (1.350; 1.16, 1.572), comorbidity of diabetes (1.474; 1.178, 1.844), and inadequate fruit consumption (1.253; 1.094, 1.436).
Conclusions
As the prehypertensive state may affect the prevalence of hypertension, proactive strategies are needed to increase early detection of the disease among specific group of those residing in a rural area, older age, male, family history of hypertension, and overweight or obese.
{"title":"Prevalence and Factors Associated with Prehypertension and Hypertension Among Adults: Baseline Findings of PURE Malaysia Cohort Study","authors":"Rosnah Ismail , Noor Hassim Ismail , Zaleha Md Isa , Azmi Mohd Tamil , Mohd Hasni Ja'afar , Nafiza Mat Nasir , Suraya Abdul-Razak , Najihah Zainol Abidin , Nurul Hafiza Ab Razak , Philip Joseph , Khairul Hazdi Yusof","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100049","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100049","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although prehypertension and hypertension can be detected at the primary healthcare level and low-cost treatments can effectively control its complications, hypertension is still the world's leading preventable risk factor. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine its prevalence and its risk factors among Malaysian adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study involving 7585 adults was performed covering the rural and urban areas. Respondents with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 120-139 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 80-89 mmHg were categorized as prehypertensive, and hypertensive categorization was used for respondents with an SBP of ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP of ≥90 mmHg.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondents reported to have prehypertension and hypertension were 40.7% and 38.0%, respectively. Those residing in a rural area, older age, male, family history of hypertension, and overweight or obese were associated with higher odds of prehypertension and hypertension. Unique to hypertension, the factors included low educational level (AOR: 1.349; 95% CI: 1.146, 1.588), unemployment (1.350; 1.16, 1.572), comorbidity of diabetes (1.474; 1.178, 1.844), and inadequate fruit consumption (1.253; 1.094, 1.436).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>As the prehypertensive state may affect the prevalence of hypertension, proactive strategies are needed to increase early detection of the disease among specific group of those residing in a rural area, older age, male, family history of hypertension, and overweight or obese.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46528268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100047
Dae Hyun Lee , Vidhi Patel , Nicholas Mencer , Sasha Ann East , Nhi Tran , Theresa Beckie , Janice Zgibor , Joel Fernandez
Objective
The social determinants of health (SDoH) account for 80%-90% of modifiable contributors to health outcomes for chronic diseases such as heart failure. Knowledge gaps exist on how SDoH influences hospitalization rates in women with heart failure. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between the baseline SDoH status of women with heart failure with subsequent all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalization.
Methods
This is a prospective observational longitudinal cohort study of women diagnosed with heart failure with 6-month follow-up. The subjects completed SDoH assessment by the Institute of Medicine. Monthly follow-ups were performed to assess for hospitalization events.
Results
A total of 92 patients with at least 1 follow-up clinic visit were included. The mean age was 66 ± 15 years and 80% had nonischemic cardiomyopathy as the etiology of heart failure. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications I-II were the most common (n = 66, 71.8%). In total, 51 patients (55.4%) had overall high-risk SDoH (4 or more SDoH domains at risk). By the 6-month follow-up, 22 (23.9%) patients were hospitalized for any cause; 8 patients (8.7%) were hospitalized for cardiovascular causes. There were no deaths. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the high-risk SDoH group had a higher odds ratio for all-cause hospitalization (OR 5.31, 95% CI 1.59-17.73). In addition, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 12-item (KCCQ-12) scores, surrogate for quality of life, were worse in the high-risk SDoH group.
Conclusion
SDoH adversely impacts hospitalizations and quality of life in women with heart failure. Future efforts for screening and interventions should evaluate the SDoH at all levels, including the individual health care provider, institutional, and national levels.
目的健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)占慢性疾病(如心力衰竭)健康结果可改变因素的80%-90%。关于SDoH如何影响心力衰竭妇女的住院率存在知识空白。我们的目的是评估心力衰竭妇女的基线SDoH状况与随后的全因和心血管住院之间的关系。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性纵向队列研究,对诊断为心力衰竭的女性进行了6个月的随访。受试者完成了医学研究所的SDoH评估。每月随访以评估住院事件。结果共纳入92例患者,随访至少1次。平均年龄66±15岁,80%的患者因非缺血性心肌病导致心力衰竭。纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分类I-II最常见(n = 66, 71.8%)。总共有51例患者(55.4%)具有总体高危SDoH(4个或更多SDoH域处于危险中)。随访6个月时,22例(23.9%)患者因各种原因住院;8例(8.7%)因心血管原因住院。没有人员死亡。在多因素logistic回归分析中,SDoH高危组的全因住院优势比更高(OR 5.31, 95% CI 1.59-17.73)。此外,堪萨斯城心肌病问卷12项(KCCQ-12)评分,替代生活质量,在高危SDoH组更差。结论sdoh对心力衰竭患者的住院率和生活质量有不利影响。未来在筛查和干预方面的努力应在各个层面评估健康状况,包括个人卫生保健提供者、机构和国家层面。
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health in Women With Heart Failure: Prospective Observational Cohort Study","authors":"Dae Hyun Lee , Vidhi Patel , Nicholas Mencer , Sasha Ann East , Nhi Tran , Theresa Beckie , Janice Zgibor , Joel Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100047","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100047","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The social determinants of health (SDoH) account for 80%-90% of modifiable contributors to health outcomes for chronic diseases such as heart failure. Knowledge gaps exist on how SDoH influences hospitalization rates in women with heart failure. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between the baseline SDoH status of women with heart failure with subsequent all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a prospective observational longitudinal cohort study of women diagnosed with heart failure with 6-month follow-up. The subjects completed SDoH assessment by the Institute of Medicine. Monthly follow-ups were performed to assess for hospitalization events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 92 patients with at least 1 follow-up clinic visit were included. The mean age was 66 ± 15 years and 80% had nonischemic cardiomyopathy as the etiology of heart failure. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classifications I-II were the most common (<em>n</em> = 66, 71.8%). In total, 51 patients (55.4%) had overall high-risk SDoH (4 or more SDoH domains at risk). By the 6-month follow-up, 22 (23.9%) patients were hospitalized for any cause; 8 patients (8.7%) were hospitalized for cardiovascular causes. There were no deaths. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the high-risk SDoH group had a higher odds ratio for all-cause hospitalization (OR 5.31, 95% CI 1.59-17.73). In addition, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire 12-item (KCCQ-12) scores, surrogate for quality of life, were worse in the high-risk SDoH group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SDoH adversely impacts hospitalizations and quality of life in women with heart failure. Future efforts for screening and interventions should evaluate the SDoH at all levels, including the individual health care provider, institutional, and national levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48188924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100045
Xue Yu , Suvankar Majumdar , J. Daryl Pollard , Erin Jackson , Jarrod Knudson , Douglas Wolfe , Gregory J. Kato , Joseph F. Maher
Background
Sickle cell disease, a common genetic disorder in African Americans, manifests an increased risk of sudden death, the basis of which is incompletely understood. Prolongation of heart rate–corrected QT (QTc) interval on the electrocardiogram, a standard clinical measure of cardiac repolarization, may contribute to sudden death by predisposing to torsades de pointes ventricular tachycardia.
Methods
We established a cohort study of 293 adult and 121 pediatric sickle cell disease patients drawn from the same geographic region as the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) cohort, in which significant correlates of QT duration have been characterized and quantitatively modeled. Herein, we establish clinical and laboratory correlates of QTc duration in our cohort using stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis. We then compared our adult sickle cell disease data to effect-size predictions from the published JHS statistical model of QT interval duration.
Results
In adult sickle cell disease, gender, diuretic use, QRS duration, serum ALT levels, anion gap, and diastolic blood pressure show positive correlation; hemoglobin levels show inverse correlation; in pediatric sickle cell disease, age, hemoglobin levels, and serum bicarbonate and creatinine levels show inverse correlation. The mean QTc in our adult sickle cell disease cohort is 7.8 milliseconds longer than in the JHS cohort, even though the JHS statistical model predicts that the mean QTc in our cohort should be >11 milliseconds shorter than in the much older JHS cohort, a differential of >18 milliseconds.
Conclusion
Sickle cell disease patients have substantial QTc prolongation relative to their age, driven by factors, some overlapping, in adult and pediatric sickle cell disease, and distinct from those that have been defined in the general African American community.
{"title":"Clinical and Laboratory Correlates of QTc Duration in Adult and Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease","authors":"Xue Yu , Suvankar Majumdar , J. Daryl Pollard , Erin Jackson , Jarrod Knudson , Douglas Wolfe , Gregory J. Kato , Joseph F. Maher","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100045","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sickle cell disease, a common genetic disorder in African Americans, manifests an increased risk of sudden death, the basis of which is incompletely understood. Prolongation of heart rate–corrected QT (QTc) interval on the electrocardiogram, a standard clinical measure of cardiac repolarization, may contribute to sudden death by predisposing to <em>torsades de pointes</em> ventricular tachycardia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We established a cohort study of 293 adult and 121 pediatric sickle cell disease patients drawn from the same geographic region as the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) cohort, in which significant correlates of QT duration have been characterized and quantitatively modeled. Herein, we establish clinical and laboratory correlates of QTc duration in our cohort using stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis. We then compared our adult sickle cell disease data to effect-size predictions from the published JHS statistical model of QT interval duration.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In adult sickle cell disease, gender, diuretic use, QRS duration, serum ALT levels, anion gap, and diastolic blood pressure show positive correlation; hemoglobin levels show inverse correlation; in pediatric sickle cell disease, age, hemoglobin levels, and serum bicarbonate and creatinine levels show inverse correlation. The mean QTc in our adult sickle cell disease cohort is 7.8 milliseconds longer than in the JHS cohort, even though the JHS statistical model predicts that the mean QTc in our cohort should be >11 milliseconds shorter than in the much older JHS cohort, a differential of >18 milliseconds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Sickle cell disease patients have substantial QTc prolongation relative to their age, driven by factors, some overlapping, in adult and pediatric sickle cell disease, and distinct from those that have been defined in the general African American community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49715274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-09DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100046
Michael Lockhart, Muhammad Ridhwaan Salehmohamed, Dileep Kumar, Anne Graham Cummiskey, Keat Cheah Seong, Seamus Sreenan, John McDermott
Aims
Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is the most common inherited disease in European populations. It is particularly common in people of Irish heritage, approximately 2% of whom will be at risk of iron overload as a result of human homoeostatic iron regulator protein (HFE) gene mutations. We aimed to evaluate the utility of screening for HH in newly referred patients with DM of Irish heritage in a prospective study.
Methods
Of 575 patients newly referred between March 2018 and March 2021, 556 attended for blood testing, to include fasting transferrin saturations, prior to their first clinic visit. Patients with elevated transferrin saturations were further screened for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) with HFE gene analysis.
Results
Transferrin saturations were elevated in 13 of 556 patients (2.3%), 3 of whom had a preexisting diagnosis of HH. Of the remaining 10 patients, 7 had HFE gene mutations suggestive of HH (2 C282Y homozygous, 3 C282Y/H63D compound heterozygous, and 2 H63D homozygous), 1 was a HH carrier (C282Y heterozygous), and 2 had normal genetics.
Conclusions
The prevalence of HH of 1.8% in this screened DM population is lower than the reported incidence of HH in the Irish population, suggesting a limited utility of routine screening for HH in newly referred patients with DM.
{"title":"Screening for Hereditary Hemochromatosis in Newly Referred Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Michael Lockhart, Muhammad Ridhwaan Salehmohamed, Dileep Kumar, Anne Graham Cummiskey, Keat Cheah Seong, Seamus Sreenan, John McDermott","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100046","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is the most common inherited disease in European populations. It is particularly common in people of Irish heritage, approximately 2% of whom will be at risk of iron overload as a result of human homoeostatic iron regulator protein (<em>HFE</em>) gene mutations. We aimed to evaluate the utility of screening for HH in newly referred patients with DM of Irish heritage in a prospective study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Of 575 patients newly referred between March 2018 and March 2021, 556 attended for blood testing, to include fasting transferrin saturations, prior to their first clinic visit. Patients with elevated transferrin saturations were further screened for hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) with <em>HFE</em> gene analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Transferrin saturations were elevated in 13 of 556 patients (2.3%), 3 of whom had a preexisting diagnosis of HH. Of the remaining 10 patients, 7 had <em>HFE</em> gene mutations suggestive of HH (2 C282Y homozygous, 3 C282Y/H63D compound heterozygous, and 2 H63D homozygous), 1 was a HH carrier (C282Y heterozygous), and 2 had normal genetics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The prevalence of HH of 1.8% in this screened DM population is lower than the reported incidence of HH in the Irish population, suggesting a limited utility of routine screening for HH in newly referred patients with DM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49714985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100044
Yousif M. Hydoub , Andrew P. Walker , Robert W. Kirchoff , Hossam M. Alzu'bi , Patricia Y. Chipi , Danielle J. Gerberi , M. Caroline Burton , M. Hassan Murad , Sagar B. Dugani
Objective
To systematically review contemporary prediction models for hospital mortality developed or validated in general medical patients.
Methods
We screened articles in five databases, from January 1, 2010, through April 7, 2022, and the bibliography of articles selected for final inclusion. We assessed the quality for risk of bias and applicability using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) and extracted data using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist. Two investigators independently screened each article, assessed quality, and extracted data.
Results
From 20,424 unique articles, we identified 15 models in 8 studies across 10 countries. The studies included 280,793 general medical patients and 19,923 hospital deaths. Models included 7 early warning scores, 2 comorbidities indices, and 6 combination models. Ten models were studied in all general medical patients (general models) and 7 in general medical patients with infection (infection models). Of the 15 models, 13 were developed using logistic or Poisson regression and 2 using machine learning methods. Also, 4 of 15 models reported on handling of missing values. None of the infection models had high discrimination, whereas 4 of 10 general models had high discrimination (area under curve >0.8). Only 1 model appropriately assessed calibration. All models had high risk of bias; 4 of 10 general models and 5 of 7 infection models had low concern for applicability for general medical patients.
Conclusion
Mortality prediction models for general medical patients were sparse and differed in quality, applicability, and discrimination. These models require hospital-level validation and/or recalibration in general medical patients to guide mortality reduction interventions.
{"title":"Risk Prediction Models for Hospital Mortality in General Medical Patients: A Systematic Review","authors":"Yousif M. Hydoub , Andrew P. Walker , Robert W. Kirchoff , Hossam M. Alzu'bi , Patricia Y. Chipi , Danielle J. Gerberi , M. Caroline Burton , M. Hassan Murad , Sagar B. Dugani","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100044","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To systematically review contemporary prediction models for hospital mortality developed or validated in general medical patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We screened articles in five databases, from January 1, 2010, through April 7, 2022, and the bibliography of articles selected for final inclusion. We assessed the quality for risk of bias and applicability using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) and extracted data using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist. Two investigators independently screened each article, assessed quality, and extracted data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 20,424 unique articles, we identified 15 models in 8 studies across 10 countries. The studies included 280,793 general medical patients and 19,923 hospital deaths. Models included 7 early warning scores, 2 comorbidities indices, and 6 combination models. Ten models were studied in all general medical patients (general models) and 7 in general medical patients with infection (infection models). Of the 15 models, 13 were developed using logistic or Poisson regression and 2 using machine learning methods. Also, 4 of 15 models reported on handling of missing values. None of the infection models had high discrimination, whereas 4 of 10 general models had high discrimination (area under curve >0.8). Only 1 model appropriately assessed calibration. All models had high risk of bias; 4 of 10 general models and 5 of 7 infection models had low concern for applicability for general medical patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Mortality prediction models for general medical patients were sparse and differed in quality, applicability, and discrimination. These models require hospital-level validation and/or recalibration in general medical patients to guide mortality reduction interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49734425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100037
Michael Manansala , Faria Sami , Shilpa Arora , Augustine M. Manadan
Purpose
Sarcoidosis is a multisystem immune disease with a high rate of hospitalization. There is a paucity of large population-based studies on sarcoid inpatients. We aimed to examine the reasons for hospitalizations and mortality of adult sarcoid patients utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.
Methods
Adult hospitalizations in 2016-2019 NIS database with sarcoidosis (ICD-10 code D86) were analyzed. The “reason for hospitalization” and “reason for in-hospital death” were divided into 19 organ system/disease categories based on their principal ICD-10 hospital billing diagnosis.
Results
Among the 330,470 sarcoid hospitalizations, cardiovascular (20.4%) and respiratory (16.9%) diagnoses were the most common reasons for hospitalization. The most common individual diagnoses were sepsis and pneumonia. In-hospital death occurred in 2.4% of sarcoid hospitalizations. The most common reasons for death were infectious (30%), cardiovascular (20.7%), and respiratory (20.3%) diagnoses. The most common individual diagnoses in the deceased group were sepsis and respiratory failure. Finally, the sarcoid group had a higher frequency of complications including arrhythmias/heart blocks, heart failure, cranial neuropathies, hypercalcemia, iridocyclitis, myocarditis, and myositis. Sarcoid inpatients had longer length of stay (4 vs 3 days; p < .001) and higher median total hospital charges ($36,865 vs $31,742; p < .001).
Conclusions
The most common reasons for sarcoid hospitalizations were cardiovascular and respiratory. Nearly 1 in 40 hospitalizations resulted in death, with most common complications being conduction abnormalities and heart failure. The most common causes of in-hospital death were sepsis and respiratory failure. Sarcoid hospitalizations had 16% higher total hospital charges compared to nonsarcoid inpatients.
{"title":"Reasons for Hospitalization and All-Cause Mortality for Adults with Sarcoidosis","authors":"Michael Manansala , Faria Sami , Shilpa Arora , Augustine M. Manadan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100037","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Sarcoidosis is a multisystem immune disease with a high rate of hospitalization. There is a paucity of large population-based studies on sarcoid inpatients. We aimed to examine the reasons for hospitalizations and mortality of adult sarcoid patients utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adult hospitalizations in 2016-2019 NIS database with sarcoidosis (ICD-10 code D86) were analyzed. The “reason for hospitalization” and “reason for in-hospital death” were divided into 19 organ system/disease categories based on their principal ICD-10 hospital billing diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 330,470 sarcoid hospitalizations, cardiovascular (20.4%) and respiratory (16.9%) diagnoses were the most common reasons for hospitalization. The most common individual diagnoses were sepsis and pneumonia. In-hospital death occurred in 2.4% of sarcoid hospitalizations. The most common reasons for death were infectious (30%), cardiovascular (20.7%), and respiratory (20.3%) diagnoses. The most common individual diagnoses in the deceased group were sepsis and respiratory failure. Finally, the sarcoid group had a higher frequency of complications including arrhythmias/heart blocks, heart failure, cranial neuropathies, hypercalcemia, iridocyclitis, myocarditis, and myositis. Sarcoid inpatients had longer length of stay (4 vs 3 days; <em>p</em> < .001) and higher median total hospital charges ($36,865 vs $31,742; <em>p</em> < .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The most common reasons for sarcoid hospitalizations were cardiovascular and respiratory. Nearly 1 in 40 hospitalizations resulted in death, with most common complications being conduction abnormalities and heart failure. The most common causes of in-hospital death were sepsis and respiratory failure. Sarcoid hospitalizations had 16% higher total hospital charges compared to nonsarcoid inpatients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49071745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100031
U.S. Afsheen Syeda , Daniel Battillo , Aayush Visaria , Steven K. Malin
Exercise is a first-line therapy recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although moderate to vigorous exercise (e.g. 150 min/wk) is often advised alongside diet and/or behavior modification, exercise is an independent treatment that can prevent, delay or reverse T2D. Habitual exercise, consisting of aerobic, resistance or their combination, fosters improved short- and long-term glycemic control. Recent work also shows high-intensity interval training is successful at lowering blood glucose, as is breaking up sedentary behavior with short-bouts of light to vigorous movement (e.g. up to 3min). Interestingly, performing afternoon compared with morning as well as post-meal versus pre-meal exercise may yield slightly better glycemic benefit. Despite these efficacious benefits of exercise for T2D care, optimal exercise recommendations remain unclear when considering, dietary, medication, and/or other behaviors.
{"title":"The importance of exercise for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes","authors":"U.S. Afsheen Syeda , Daniel Battillo , Aayush Visaria , Steven K. Malin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100031","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100031","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exercise is a first-line therapy recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although moderate to vigorous exercise (e.g. 150 min/wk) is often advised alongside diet and/or behavior modification, exercise is an independent treatment that can prevent, delay or reverse T2D. Habitual exercise, consisting of aerobic, resistance or their combination, fosters improved short- and long-term glycemic control. Recent work also shows high-intensity interval training is successful at lowering blood glucose, as is breaking up sedentary behavior with short-bouts of light to vigorous movement (e.g. up to 3min). Interestingly, performing afternoon compared with morning as well as post-meal versus pre-meal exercise may yield slightly better glycemic benefit. Despite these efficacious benefits of exercise for T2D care, optimal exercise recommendations remain unclear when considering, dietary, medication, and/or other behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48712319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100040
Leonard K. Wang , Yong-Fang Kuo , Jordan Westra , Mukaila A. Raji , Mohanad Albayyaa , Joseph Allencherril , Jacques Baillargeon
Background
The use of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and anticoagulants may be associated with fewer adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
Methods
Nested within a cohort of 800,913 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between April 1, 2020 and June 24, 2021 from the Optum COVID-19 database, three case-control studies were conducted. Cases—defined as persons who: (1) were hospitalized within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis (n = 88,405); (2) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)/received mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 hospitalization (n = 22,147); and (3) died during COVID-19 hospitalization (n = 2300)—were matched 1:1 using demographic/clinical factors with controls randomly selected from a pool of patients who did not experience the case definition/event. Medication use was based on prescription ≤90 days before COVID-19 diagnosis.
Results
Statin use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.69, 0.75) and ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84, 0.97). ACEI/ARB use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65, 0.70), ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86, 0.99), and death (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47, 0.78). Anticoagulant use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89, 0.99) and death (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41, 0.77). Interaction effects—in the model predicting hospitalization—were statistically significant for statins and ACEI/ARBs (P < .0001), statins and anticoagulants (P = .003), ACEI/ARBs and anticoagulants (P < .0001). An interaction effect—in the model predicting ventilator use/ICU—was statistically significant for statins and ACEI/ARBs (P = .002).
Conclusions
Statins, ACEI/ARBs, and anticoagulants were associated with decreased risks of the adverse outcomes under study. These findings may provide clinically relevant information regarding potential treatment for patients with COVID-19.
{"title":"Association of Cardiovascular Medications With Adverse Outcomes in a Matched Analysis of a National Cohort of Patients With COVID-19","authors":"Leonard K. Wang , Yong-Fang Kuo , Jordan Westra , Mukaila A. Raji , Mohanad Albayyaa , Joseph Allencherril , Jacques Baillargeon","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100040","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100040","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and anticoagulants may be associated with fewer adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nested within a cohort of 800,913 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between April 1, 2020 and June 24, 2021 from the Optum COVID-19 database, three case-control studies were conducted. Cases—defined as persons who: (1) were hospitalized within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis (<em>n</em> = 88,405); (2) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)/received mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 hospitalization (<em>n</em> = 22,147); and (3) died during COVID-19 hospitalization (<em>n</em> = 2300)—were matched 1:1 using demographic/clinical factors with controls randomly selected from a pool of patients who did not experience the case definition/event. Medication use was based on prescription ≤90 days before COVID-19 diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Statin use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.69, 0.75) and ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84, 0.97). ACEI/ARB use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65, 0.70), ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86, 0.99), and death (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47, 0.78). Anticoagulant use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89, 0.99) and death (aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41, 0.77). Interaction effects—in the model predicting hospitalization—were statistically significant for statins and ACEI/ARBs (<em>P</em> < .0001), statins and anticoagulants (<em>P</em> = .003), ACEI/ARBs and anticoagulants (<em>P</em> < .0001). An interaction effect—in the model predicting ventilator use/ICU—was statistically significant for statins and ACEI/ARBs (<em>P</em> = .002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Statins, ACEI/ARBs, and anticoagulants were associated with decreased risks of the adverse outcomes under study. These findings may provide clinically relevant information regarding potential treatment for patients with COVID-19.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032048/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9573485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}