Pub Date : 2024-09-30eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.2733
Louise Declerck, Mathilde Gillot, Charlotte Goffaux, Jean-François Kaux, Gaëtan Stoquart
Introduction: Physical therapists (PTs) are key actors in physical activity (PA) promotion. However, it remains unclear whether PTs in community settings promote community-based PA such as adapted physical activity (APA) and adaptive sports (AS) to their patients with neurological conditions (NCs). The main purposes were to evaluate the beliefs PTs have of APA and AS, and to explore actions they undertake to promote it to their patients with NCs.
Methods: An online survey was created specifically for the study. PT associations and institutions were contacted and licensed PTs working in community-based settings, treating at least one patient with a NC, were invited to participate. Questionnaires were analyzed only if all mandatory questions had been answered.
Results: A total of 165 questionnaires were analyzed. PTs reported prioritizing active treatment. They viewed APA and AS as beneficial for their patients with NCs; however, its promotion remained largely infrequent due to a number of barriers. The PTs' own level of PA seemed to significantly influence their beliefs of the benefits of APA and AS (p = 0.001), while being specialized in neurologic physical therapy enabled the PTs to increase frequency of promotion (p = 0.003).
Conclusion: Though community-based PTs are aware of the importance of PA for individuals with NCs, they face difficulties in promoting it to their patients. However, these difficulties are reduced among PTs who are specialized in neurologic physical therapy. Efforts should be made toward educating PTs to neurological pathologies and their specificities when it comes to PA.
导言:物理治疗师(PTs)是促进体育活动(PA)的主要参与者。然而,在社区环境中,物理治疗师是否向其神经系统疾病(NCs)患者推广以社区为基础的体育活动,如适应性体育活动(APA)和适应性运动(AS),目前仍不清楚。研究的主要目的是评估护理人员对适应性体育活动(APA)和适应性运动(AS)的看法,并探讨他们为向神经系统疾病(NC)患者推广这些活动而采取的行动:方法:为本研究专门制作了一份在线调查问卷。我们联系了PT协会和机构,并邀请在社区工作、至少治疗一名NC患者的持证PT参与调查。只有回答了所有必答问题,才会对问卷进行分析:共分析了 165 份问卷。PT 报告称,积极治疗是优先事项。他们认为APA和AS对NC患者有益;然而,由于一些障碍,推广APA和AS的频率仍然很低。物理治疗师自身的PA水平似乎极大地影响了他们对APA和AS益处的看法(p = 0.001),而作为神经物理治疗的专家,物理治疗师能够增加推广的频率(p = 0.003):结论:尽管社区理疗师意识到 PA 对 NC 患者的重要性,但他们在向患者推广 PA 时却遇到了困难。然而,这些困难在专门从事神经物理治疗的康复理疗师中有所减少。应努力教育理疗师,让他们了解神经系统病症及其在 PA 方面的特殊性。
{"title":"Neurological conditions and community-based physical activity: physical therapists' belief and actions.","authors":"Louise Declerck, Mathilde Gillot, Charlotte Goffaux, Jean-François Kaux, Gaëtan Stoquart","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.2733","DOIUrl":"10.33393/aop.2024.2733","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical therapists (PTs) are key actors in physical activity (PA) promotion. However, it remains unclear whether PTs in community settings promote community-based PA such as adapted physical activity (APA) and adaptive sports (AS) to their patients with neurological conditions (NCs). The main purposes were to evaluate the beliefs PTs have of APA and AS, and to explore actions they undertake to promote it to their patients with NCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was created specifically for the study. PT associations and institutions were contacted and licensed PTs working in community-based settings, treating at least one patient with a NC, were invited to participate. Questionnaires were analyzed only if all mandatory questions had been answered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 165 questionnaires were analyzed. PTs reported prioritizing active treatment. They viewed APA and AS as beneficial for their patients with NCs; however, its promotion remained largely infrequent due to a number of barriers. The PTs' own level of PA seemed to significantly influence their beliefs of the benefits of APA and AS (p = 0.001), while being specialized in neurologic physical therapy enabled the PTs to increase frequency of promotion (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though community-based PTs are aware of the importance of PA for individuals with NCs, they face difficulties in promoting it to their patients. However, these difficulties are reduced among PTs who are specialized in neurologic physical therapy. Efforts should be made toward educating PTs to neurological pathologies and their specificities when it comes to PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-16eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.3128
Chad E Cook, Bryan O'Halloran, Steve Karas, Mareli Klopper, Jodi L Young
In the context of clinical trials, treatment fidelity (TF) has traditionally referred to the extent to which an intervention or treatment is implemented by the clinicians as intended by the researchers who designed the trial. Updated definitions of TF have included an appropriate design of the intervention that was performed in a way that is known to be therapeutically beneficial. This requires careful attention to three key components: (1) protocol and dosage adherence, (2) quality of delivery, and (3) participant adherence. In this viewpoint, we describe several cases in which TF was lacking in clinical trials and give opportunities to improve the deficits encountered in those trials. We feel that along with quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence, TF should be considered an essential element of the veracity of clinical trial.
{"title":"Treatment fidelity in clinical trials.","authors":"Chad E Cook, Bryan O'Halloran, Steve Karas, Mareli Klopper, Jodi L Young","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3128","DOIUrl":"10.33393/aop.2024.3128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of clinical trials, treatment fidelity (TF) has traditionally referred to the extent to which an intervention or treatment is implemented by the clinicians as intended by the researchers who designed the trial. Updated definitions of TF have included an appropriate design of the intervention that was performed in a way that is known to be therapeutically beneficial. This requires careful attention to three key components: (1) protocol and dosage adherence, (2) quality of delivery, and (3) participant adherence. In this viewpoint, we describe several cases in which TF was lacking in clinical trials and give opportunities to improve the deficits encountered in those trials. We feel that along with quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence, TF should be considered an essential element of the veracity of clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"65-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413885/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-13eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.3056
Amélie Kechichian, Elsa Viain, Thomas Lathière, François Desmeules, Nicolas Pinsault
Background: A new advanced practice model of care enables French physiotherapists to perform medical acts for low back pain (LBP) patients as first-contact physiotherapists (FCPs).
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the self-perceived competency of FCPs and to further explore factors underpinning this feeling.
Methods: A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A survey was used to self-assess the perceived competency of FCPs in performing medical tasks. Semi-structured interviews were then performed to explore determining factors of perceived competency. Inductive thematic analysis was performed.
Results: Nine FCPs answered the survey and were interviewed (mean age 40.1, standard deviation [SD]: ±10.0). FCPs felt very competent with making medical diagnosis (3.44/4, SD: ±0.53), analgesic prescription (3.11, SD: ±0.78) and referring onward to physiotherapy (3.78, SD: ±0.55). They did not feel competent with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription (2.78, SD: ±0.67) and issuing sick leave certificate (2.67, SD: ±1.0). The main identified influencing factors were previous FCPs' experience, training, knowledge, collaboration with family physicians, high responsibility and risk management associated with decision-making.
Conclusion: French FCPs appeared to have the necessary skills to directly manage LBP patients without medical referral. Future training focusing on analgesic prescription and issuing sick leave certificate is however needed.
{"title":"First-contact physiotherapists' perceived competency in a new model of care for low back pain patients: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Amélie Kechichian, Elsa Viain, Thomas Lathière, François Desmeules, Nicolas Pinsault","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A new advanced practice model of care enables French physiotherapists to perform medical acts for low back pain (LBP) patients as first-contact physiotherapists (FCPs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the self-perceived competency of FCPs and to further explore factors underpinning this feeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A survey was used to self-assess the perceived competency of FCPs in performing medical tasks. Semi-structured interviews were then performed to explore determining factors of perceived competency. Inductive thematic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine FCPs answered the survey and were interviewed (mean age 40.1, standard deviation [SD]: ±10.0). FCPs felt very competent with making medical diagnosis (3.44/4, SD: ±0.53), analgesic prescription (3.11, SD: ±0.78) and referring onward to physiotherapy (3.78, SD: ±0.55). They did not feel competent with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription (2.78, SD: ±0.67) and issuing sick leave certificate (2.67, SD: ±1.0). The main identified influencing factors were previous FCPs' experience, training, knowledge, collaboration with family physicians, high responsibility and risk management associated with decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>French FCPs appeared to have the necessary skills to directly manage LBP patients without medical referral. Future training focusing on analgesic prescription and issuing sick leave certificate is however needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.3015
Linda Dyer, Jaap Swanenburg, Hermann Schwameder, Samy Bouaicha
Background: Recovery of overhead mobility after shoulder surgery is time-consuming and important for patient satisfaction. Overhead stretching and mobilization of the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral (GH) joints are common treatment interventions. The isolated GH range of motion (ROM) of flexion, abduction, and external rotation required to move above 120° of global shoulder flexion in the clinical setting remains unclear. This study clarified the GH ROM needed for overhead mobility.
Methods: The timely development of shoulder ROM in patients after shoulder surgery was analyzed. Passive global shoulder flexion, GH flexion, abduction, and external rotation ROM were measured using goniometry and visually at 2-week intervals starting 6-week postsurgery until the end of treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the GH ROM cutoff values allowing overhead mobility.
Results: A total of 21 patients (mean age 49 years; 76% men) after rotator cuff repair (71%), Latarjet shoulder stabilization (19%), and arthroscopic biceps tenotomy (10%) were included. The ROM cutoff value that accurately allowed overhead mobility was 83° for GH flexion and abduction with the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 (p < 0.001). The cutoff value for GH external rotation was 53% of the amount of movement on the opposite side (AUC 0.87, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Global shoulder flexion above 120° needs almost full GH flexion and abduction to be executable. External rotation ROM seems less important as long as it reaches over 53% of the opposite side.
背景:肩部手术后高举活动度的恢复非常耗时,而且对患者的满意度非常重要。肩胛胸关节和盂肱关节(GH)的高举伸展和活动是常见的治疗干预措施。在临床环境中,肩关节整体屈曲120°以上所需的屈曲、外展和外旋的孤立GH活动范围(ROM)仍不明确。本研究明确了高举活动所需的GH ROM:方法:分析了肩部手术后患者肩部 ROM 的及时发展情况。从术后6周开始至治疗结束,每隔2周使用动态关节角度计和目测法测量被动肩关节整体屈曲、GH屈曲、外展和外旋ROM。使用接收者操作特征曲线来确定GH ROM的临界值,使其能够进行高举活动:共有21名患者(平均年龄49岁,76%为男性)接受了肩袖修复术(71%)、Latarjet肩关节稳定术(19%)和关节镜下肱二头肌腱切开术(10%)。能准确实现头顶活动度的ROM临界值为GH屈曲和外展83°,曲线下面积(AUC)范围为0.90至0.93(P < 0.001)。GH外旋的临界值为对侧活动量的53%(AUC为0.87,P < 0.001):结论:120°以上的肩关节整体屈曲需要几乎完全的GH屈曲和外展才能实现。只要外旋 ROM 达到对侧的 53% 以上,外旋 ROM 似乎就不那么重要了。
{"title":"Defining the glenohumeral range of motion required for overhead shoulder mobility: an observational study.","authors":"Linda Dyer, Jaap Swanenburg, Hermann Schwameder, Samy Bouaicha","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recovery of overhead mobility after shoulder surgery is time-consuming and important for patient satisfaction. Overhead stretching and mobilization of the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral (GH) joints are common treatment interventions. The isolated GH range of motion (ROM) of flexion, abduction, and external rotation required to move above 120° of global shoulder flexion in the clinical setting remains unclear. This study clarified the GH ROM needed for overhead mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The timely development of shoulder ROM in patients after shoulder surgery was analyzed. Passive global shoulder flexion, GH flexion, abduction, and external rotation ROM were measured using goniometry and visually at 2-week intervals starting 6-week postsurgery until the end of treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the GH ROM cutoff values allowing overhead mobility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 patients (mean age 49 years; 76% men) after rotator cuff repair (71%), Latarjet shoulder stabilization (19%), and arthroscopic biceps tenotomy (10%) were included. The ROM cutoff value that accurately allowed overhead mobility was 83° for GH flexion and abduction with the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 (p < 0.001). The cutoff value for GH external rotation was 53% of the amount of movement on the opposite side (AUC 0.87, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Global shoulder flexion above 120° needs almost full GH flexion and abduction to be executable. External rotation ROM seems less important as long as it reaches over 53% of the opposite side.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393552/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.3063
Rahel Caliesch, David Beckwée, Jan Taeymans, Joseph M Schwab, Thomas Renaud, Quentin Brossard, Roger Hilfiker
Introduction: Hip microinstability has become a recognized cause of non-arthritic hip pain and disability in young patients. However, its pathophysiology remains unclear. We want to (1) present an overview of the evidence of hip microinstability and of its association with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), (2) map out the type of evidence available, and (3) make recommendations for future research.
Methods: A deductive analysis and extraction method was used to extract information. In addition, diagnostic accuracy statistics were extracted or calculated.
Results: Of the 2,808 identified records, 123 were eligible for inclusion. Different definitions for microinstability exist. A standardized terminology and clear diagnostic criteria are lacking. FAI and microinstability may be associated and may aggravate each other. Conservative treatment strategies for FAI and microinstability are similar. The reported prevalence of microinstability in combination with FAI ranges from 21% to 42% in adults undergoing hip arthroscopy or magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip.
Conclusion: Hip microinstability and FAI may be associated, occur together, or exacerbate each other. To better address this topic, a standardized terminology for microinstability is essential. Achieving consensus on physical examination and diagnosis is also necessary. Initial efforts to establish uniform diagnostic criteria have been made, but further work is needed. Specifically, randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the effectiveness of training programmes aimed at reducing symptoms in individuals with microinstability, with or without FAI. Such studies will enable clinicians to manage microinstability with greater confidence within this context.
简介髋关节微稳定性已成为年轻患者非关节炎性髋关节疼痛和残疾的公认原因。然而,其病理生理学仍不清楚。我们希望:(1)概述髋关节微不稳及其与股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)相关性的证据;(2)描绘现有证据的类型;(3)为未来研究提出建议:方法:采用演绎分析和提取法提取信息。此外,还提取或计算了诊断准确性统计数据:结果:在 2,808 份已确定的记录中,有 123 份符合纳入条件。微不稳定性存在不同的定义。缺乏标准化的术语和明确的诊断标准。FAI和微不稳可能存在关联,并可能相互加重。FAI和微不稳的保守治疗策略相似。在接受髋关节镜检查或髋关节磁共振造影(MRA)的成年人中,微不稳合并FAI的报告发病率从21%到42%不等:结论:髋关节微不稳和 FAI 可能相关联、同时发生或相互加重。为了更好地解决这一问题,必须对髋关节微不稳的术语进行标准化。就体格检查和诊断达成共识也是必要的。建立统一诊断标准的初步工作已经完成,但仍需进一步努力。具体而言,需要进行随机对照试验,以评估旨在减轻有或没有 FAI 的微小不稳定性患者症状的训练计划的有效性。此类研究将使临床医生能够在此背景下更有信心地处理微不稳定性。
{"title":"Hip microinstability and its association with femoroacetabular impingement: A scoping review.","authors":"Rahel Caliesch, David Beckwée, Jan Taeymans, Joseph M Schwab, Thomas Renaud, Quentin Brossard, Roger Hilfiker","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3063","DOIUrl":"10.33393/aop.2024.3063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hip microinstability has become a recognized cause of non-arthritic hip pain and disability in young patients. However, its pathophysiology remains unclear. We want to (1) present an overview of the evidence of hip microinstability and of its association with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), (2) map out the type of evidence available, and (3) make recommendations for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deductive analysis and extraction method was used to extract information. In addition, diagnostic accuracy statistics were extracted or calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,808 identified records, 123 were eligible for inclusion. Different definitions for microinstability exist. A standardized terminology and clear diagnostic criteria are lacking. FAI and microinstability may be associated and may aggravate each other. Conservative treatment strategies for FAI and microinstability are similar. The reported prevalence of microinstability in combination with FAI ranges from 21% to 42% in adults undergoing hip arthroscopy or magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hip microinstability and FAI may be associated, occur together, or exacerbate each other. To better address this topic, a standardized terminology for microinstability is essential. Achieving consensus on physical examination and diagnosis is also necessary. Initial efforts to establish uniform diagnostic criteria have been made, but further work is needed. Specifically, randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate the effectiveness of training programmes aimed at reducing symptoms in individuals with microinstability, with or without FAI. Such studies will enable clinicians to manage microinstability with greater confidence within this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"29-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302423/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141899063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.3023
Erik Cattrysse, Jona Van den Broeck, Robin Petroons, Amber Teugels, Aldo Scafoglieri, Emiel van Trijffel
Introduction: Worldwide many countries provide direct access in physiotherapy. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy from different perspectives.
Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in three databases up to September 2022. Studies were included when regarding assessment of at least one of the following perspectives: patient (quality of Life, patient satisfaction, pain, functioning, adverse events), provider (treatment compliance, responsibility, liability, status, prestige, job satisfaction), and society (number of referrals, amount of medical imaging, medication use, number of sessions needed for rehabilitation, and overall costs and cost-effectiveness). Selection and methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews were performed. Data extraction and analysis were performed separately for systematic reviews and individual primary studies.
Results: Five systematic reviews as well as 17 primary studies were included. From a patient perspective, no significant effect of direct access was found for pain and a tendency in favour of direct access was found for quality of life, functioning, and well-being. Concerning providers, higher treatment compliance was found in direct access to physiotherapy and decision-making was more accurate. From a societal perspective, significant differences in favour of direct access physiotherapy were found for waiting time, prescribed medication, and medical imaging. In addition, there was a tendency towards lower health care costs.
Conclusions: Emerging evidence suggests that direct access physiotherapy could provide at least equal quality of care for patients and better opportunities for providers and the society on selected outcomes.
{"title":"Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective.","authors":"Erik Cattrysse, Jona Van den Broeck, Robin Petroons, Amber Teugels, Aldo Scafoglieri, Emiel van Trijffel","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3023","DOIUrl":"10.33393/aop.2024.3023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Worldwide many countries provide direct access in physiotherapy. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy from different perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted in three databases up to September 2022. Studies were included when regarding assessment of at least one of the following perspectives: patient (quality of Life, patient satisfaction, pain, functioning, adverse events), provider (treatment compliance, responsibility, liability, status, prestige, job satisfaction), and society (number of referrals, amount of medical imaging, medication use, number of sessions needed for rehabilitation, and overall costs and cost-effectiveness). Selection and methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews were performed. Data extraction and analysis were performed separately for systematic reviews and individual primary studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five systematic reviews as well as 17 primary studies were included. From a patient perspective, no significant effect of direct access was found for pain and a tendency in favour of direct access was found for quality of life, functioning, and well-being. Concerning providers, higher treatment compliance was found in direct access to physiotherapy and decision-making was more accurate. From a societal perspective, significant differences in favour of direct access physiotherapy were found for waiting time, prescribed medication, and medical imaging. In addition, there was a tendency towards lower health care costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that direct access physiotherapy could provide at least equal quality of care for patients and better opportunities for providers and the society on selected outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"20-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-02eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.2702
Merrill R Landers, Ash M Haller, Arturo Aldaco, Billy La, Adetayo A Babarinde, John V Rider, Jason K Longhurst
Introduction: The Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ) has good psychometric properties. However, we have recently modified the FFABQ (mFFABQ) to improve the clarity of the questions and Likert responses. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of this modified version in older adults and people with Parkinson's disease (PD).
Methods: A total of 88 participants, 39 with PD (age = 72.2 ± 9.5; 29 males, 10 females) and 49 older adults (age = 72.8 ± 5.0; 13 males, 36 females), answered the mFFABQ twice, separated by 1 week, for test-retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated through correlational analyses with fall history, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go, 30-Second Sit to Stand, Sensory Organization Test, Zung Anxiety Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Consequences of Falling Questionnaire (CoFQ), and average daily activity levels using an activity monitor.
Results: The mFFABQ had good overall test-retest reliability (intraclass correlational coefficient [ICC] = 0.822; older adult ICC = 0.781, PD ICC = 0.806). The mFFABQ correlated with fall history (r = -0.430) and exhibited high correlation with the ABC (rho = -0.804) and moderate correlations with CoFQ (rho = 0.582) and BBS (rho = -0.595). The mFFABQ also correlated with time stepping (rho = -0.298) and number of steps (rho = -0.358).
Conclusion: These results provide supportive evidence for the reliability and validity of the mFFABQ in older adults and people with PD, which supports its suitability as a clinical and research tool for the assessment of fear of falling avoidance behavior.
{"title":"The psychometric properties of the modified fear of falling avoidance behavior questionnaire in Parkinson's disease and older adults.","authors":"Merrill R Landers, Ash M Haller, Arturo Aldaco, Billy La, Adetayo A Babarinde, John V Rider, Jason K Longhurst","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.2702","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.2702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FFABQ) has good psychometric properties. However, we have recently modified the FFABQ (mFFABQ) to improve the clarity of the questions and Likert responses. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of this modified version in older adults and people with Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 88 participants, 39 with PD (age = 72.2 ± 9.5; 29 males, 10 females) and 49 older adults (age = 72.8 ± 5.0; 13 males, 36 females), answered the mFFABQ twice, separated by 1 week, for test-retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated through correlational analyses with fall history, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go, 30-Second Sit to Stand, Sensory Organization Test, Zung Anxiety Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Consequences of Falling Questionnaire (CoFQ), and average daily activity levels using an activity monitor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mFFABQ had good overall test-retest reliability (intraclass correlational coefficient [ICC] = 0.822; older adult ICC = 0.781, PD ICC = 0.806). The mFFABQ correlated with fall history (r = -0.430) and exhibited high correlation with the ABC (rho = -0.804) and moderate correlations with CoFQ (rho = 0.582) and BBS (rho = -0.595). The mFFABQ also correlated with time stepping (rho = -0.298) and number of steps (rho = -0.358).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide supportive evidence for the reliability and validity of the mFFABQ in older adults and people with PD, which supports its suitability as a clinical and research tool for the assessment of fear of falling avoidance behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11067869/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140873823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-26eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.33393/aop.2024.2916
Kyle R Adams, Ayodeji O Famuyide, Jodi L Young, C Daniel Maddox, Daniel I Rhon
Introduction: Manual therapy is an often-utilized intervention for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The interpretation of results presented by these trials can be affected by how well the study designs align applicability to real-world clinical settings.
Aim: To examine the existing body of clinical trials investigating manual therapy for knee OA to determine where they fall on the efficacy-effectiveness spectrum.
Methods: This systematic review has been guided and informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials that investigated manual therapy treatments for adults with knee OA were retrieved via searches of multiple databases to identify trials published prior to April 2023. The Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy-Effectiveness Spectrum (RITES) tool was used to objectively rate the efficacy-effectiveness nature of each trial design. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 assessment tool (RoB-2) was used to assess the risk of bias across five domains.
Results: Of the 36 trials, a higher percentage of trials had a greater emphasis on efficacy within all four domains: participant characteristics (75.0%), trial setting (77.8%), flexibility of intervention (58.3%), and clinical relevance of experimental and comparison intervention (47.2%). In addition, 13.9% of the trials had low risk of bias, 41.7% had high risk of bias, and 44.4% had some concerns regarding bias.
Conclusions: While many trials support manual therapy as effective for the management of knee OA, a greater focus on study designs with an emphasis on effectiveness would improve the applicability and generalizability of future trials.
{"title":"Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.","authors":"Kyle R Adams, Ayodeji O Famuyide, Jodi L Young, C Daniel Maddox, Daniel I Rhon","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.2916","DOIUrl":"10.33393/aop.2024.2916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Manual therapy is an often-utilized intervention for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The interpretation of results presented by these trials can be affected by how well the study designs align applicability to real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the existing body of clinical trials investigating manual therapy for knee OA to determine where they fall on the efficacy-effectiveness spectrum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review has been guided and informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials that investigated manual therapy treatments for adults with knee OA were retrieved via searches of multiple databases to identify trials published prior to April 2023. The Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy-Effectiveness Spectrum (RITES) tool was used to objectively rate the efficacy-effectiveness nature of each trial design. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 assessment tool (RoB-2) was used to assess the risk of bias across five domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 36 trials, a higher percentage of trials had a greater emphasis on efficacy within all four domains: participant characteristics (75.0%), trial setting (77.8%), flexibility of intervention (58.3%), and clinical relevance of experimental and comparison intervention (47.2%). In addition, 13.9% of the trials had low risk of bias, 41.7% had high risk of bias, and 44.4% had some concerns regarding bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While many trials support manual therapy as effective for the management of knee OA, a greater focus on study designs with an emphasis on effectiveness would improve the applicability and generalizability of future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898243/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140041065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-14DOI: 10.1186/s40945-023-00176-3
Matteo Paci, Lapo Bianchi, Elisa Buonandi, Laura Rosiello, Sandra Moretti
Background: Primary health care systems have a key role in meeting health needs of community, including function. The aim of this paper is to describe the population involved in the Community Physiotherapist project and their health outcomes over a one-year period.
Methods: The Community Physiotherapist is an on-call service which requires a request by general practitioners or medical specialists. Reason for prescription, waiting time for service delivery, diagnostic categories, provided intervention, number of interventions and outcomes were recorded for everyone included in the project. Possible differences in characteristics between individuals referred by medical specialists and general practitioners were also investigated.
Results: From January to December 2022, 409 individuals were referred to the Community Physiotherapist pathway. Functional goals were achieved in 79.5% of interventions, without reported adverse events. In most cases physiotherapists provided counselling or caregiver training and 3.3% of individuals needed a full rehabilitation program. The groups of individuals referred by the two types of prescribers showed no significant differences, apart, as expected, from their median age.
Conclusions: The introduction of the Community Physiotherapist model within the primary care setting allows to provide appropriate, effective and safe interventions. Sharing the project among all the health professionals helped to support its appropriateness and effectiveness. Results also indicate that a new organizational model, such as the Community Physiotherapist, will take a long time to be implemented.
{"title":"Implementation of community physiotherapy in primary care: one-year results of an on-call physiotherapy service.","authors":"Matteo Paci, Lapo Bianchi, Elisa Buonandi, Laura Rosiello, Sandra Moretti","doi":"10.1186/s40945-023-00176-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40945-023-00176-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary health care systems have a key role in meeting health needs of community, including function. The aim of this paper is to describe the population involved in the Community Physiotherapist project and their health outcomes over a one-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Community Physiotherapist is an on-call service which requires a request by general practitioners or medical specialists. Reason for prescription, waiting time for service delivery, diagnostic categories, provided intervention, number of interventions and outcomes were recorded for everyone included in the project. Possible differences in characteristics between individuals referred by medical specialists and general practitioners were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January to December 2022, 409 individuals were referred to the Community Physiotherapist pathway. Functional goals were achieved in 79.5% of interventions, without reported adverse events. In most cases physiotherapists provided counselling or caregiver training and 3.3% of individuals needed a full rehabilitation program. The groups of individuals referred by the two types of prescribers showed no significant differences, apart, as expected, from their median age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of the Community Physiotherapist model within the primary care setting allows to provide appropriate, effective and safe interventions. Sharing the project among all the health professionals helped to support its appropriateness and effectiveness. Results also indicate that a new organizational model, such as the Community Physiotherapist, will take a long time to be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10722761/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138800652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The role of rehabilitation after surgery in patients with low back pain is well recognized. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and update the existing evidence according to the type of clinical condition and rehabilitation approach.
Methods: This systematic review included RCTs on the effectiveness of rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science databases, up to April 15, 2023. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess each study. We conducted a quantitative synthesis when population, intervention, control, and outcome were sufficiently homogeneous; otherwise, we conducted a qualitative analysis.
Results: Forty-five studies (3.036 subjects) were included and analyzed according to the population considered: lumbar stenosis (1 trial), spondylolisthesis (3 trials), and disc herniation (41 trials). Regarding lumbar stenosis, a supervised active exercise program appears to improve outcomes related to pain, disability, and quality of life both in the short- and mid-term (1 study, n = 60). Concerning spondylolisthesis, kinesiophobia is reduced in the home exercises group compared to usual care, at 3-months follow-up (3 studies, n = 98). For disk herniation, supervised exercises are better than non-supervised exercises to reduce pain (MD -1.14; 95% CIs -1.65, -0.62; 5 trials, n = 250) and disability (SMD -0.70; 95% CIs -1.14, -0.26; 4 trials, n = 175). Supervised exercises are better than advice in reducing pain (SMD -0.91; 95% CIs -1.61, -0.21; 5 trials, n = 341) and disability (SMD -0.80; 95% CIs -1.59, -0.01; 4 trials, n = 261), in the short-term. Supervised exercises are equal to no treatment in reducing pain and disability, at 3 and 6 months after intervention (2 trials, n = 166). These results are supported by a very low to low quality of evidence.
Conclusions: Our research suggests that supervised exercise may be effective in improving patient's pain and disability after lumbar surgery, but RCTs regarding lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spondylolisthesis are still scarce, with significant heterogeneity of proposed interventions.
{"title":"Rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Tiziana Manni, Nicola Ferri, Carla Vanti, Silvano Ferrari, Ilaria Cuoghi, Claudia Gaeta, Isabella Sgaravatti, Paolo Pillastrini","doi":"10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40945-023-00175-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of rehabilitation after surgery in patients with low back pain is well recognized. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and update the existing evidence according to the type of clinical condition and rehabilitation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review included RCTs on the effectiveness of rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science databases, up to April 15, 2023. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess each study. We conducted a quantitative synthesis when population, intervention, control, and outcome were sufficiently homogeneous; otherwise, we conducted a qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five studies (3.036 subjects) were included and analyzed according to the population considered: lumbar stenosis (1 trial), spondylolisthesis (3 trials), and disc herniation (41 trials). Regarding lumbar stenosis, a supervised active exercise program appears to improve outcomes related to pain, disability, and quality of life both in the short- and mid-term (1 study, n = 60). Concerning spondylolisthesis, kinesiophobia is reduced in the home exercises group compared to usual care, at 3-months follow-up (3 studies, n = 98). For disk herniation, supervised exercises are better than non-supervised exercises to reduce pain (MD -1.14; 95% CIs -1.65, -0.62; 5 trials, n = 250) and disability (SMD -0.70; 95% CIs -1.14, -0.26; 4 trials, n = 175). Supervised exercises are better than advice in reducing pain (SMD -0.91; 95% CIs -1.61, -0.21; 5 trials, n = 341) and disability (SMD -0.80; 95% CIs -1.59, -0.01; 4 trials, n = 261), in the short-term. Supervised exercises are equal to no treatment in reducing pain and disability, at 3 and 6 months after intervention (2 trials, n = 166). These results are supported by a very low to low quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research suggests that supervised exercise may be effective in improving patient's pain and disability after lumbar surgery, but RCTs regarding lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spondylolisthesis are still scarce, with significant heterogeneity of proposed interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10578022/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41241518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}