Pub Date : 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810
Edoardo Spinazzola, Hannah Degen, Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Giulia Trotta, Edward Chesney, Zhikun Li, Luis Alameda, Bok Man Leung, Yifei Lang, Andrea Quattrone, Diego Quattrone, Erika Castrignanò, Kim Wolff, Robin Murray, Tom P Freeman, Marta Di Forti
Background: Reasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.
Objectives: We examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.
Methods: We analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.
Findings: Participants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).
Conclusions: Initiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.
Clinical implications: Asking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.
{"title":"Are reasons for first using cannabis associated with subsequent cannabis consumption (standard THC units) and psychopathology?","authors":"Edoardo Spinazzola, Hannah Degen, Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Giulia Trotta, Edward Chesney, Zhikun Li, Luis Alameda, Bok Man Leung, Yifei Lang, Andrea Quattrone, Diego Quattrone, Erika Castrignanò, Kim Wolff, Robin Murray, Tom P Freeman, Marta Di Forti","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Asking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144980578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810
Edoardo Spinazzola,Hannah Degen,Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman,Giulia Trotta,Edward Chesney,Zhikun Li,Luis Alameda,Bok Man Leung,Yifei Lang,Andrea Quattrone,Diego Quattrone,Erika Castrignanò,Kim Wolff,Robin Murray,Tom P Freeman,Marta Di Forti
BACKGROUNDReasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.OBJECTIVESWe examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.METHODSWe analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.FINDINGSParticipants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).CONCLUSIONSInitiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSAsking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.
{"title":"Are reasons for first using cannabis associated with subsequent cannabis consumption (standard THC units) and psychopathology?","authors":"Edoardo Spinazzola,Hannah Degen,Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman,Giulia Trotta,Edward Chesney,Zhikun Li,Luis Alameda,Bok Man Leung,Yifei Lang,Andrea Quattrone,Diego Quattrone,Erika Castrignanò,Kim Wolff,Robin Murray,Tom P Freeman,Marta Di Forti","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDReasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.OBJECTIVESWe examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.METHODSWe analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.FINDINGSParticipants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).CONCLUSIONSInitiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSAsking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144959888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726
Yuan Zhang,Yiyuan Gao,Yazhu Zou,Yu Ye,Fugui Jiang,Zuxing Wang,Jian Qiu,Zhili Zou
QUESTIONHow effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSISThis systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.FINDINGSPGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.CONCLUSIONSPGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERCRD42024570014.
在重度抑郁症(MDD)中,药物基因组学(PGx)指导的抗抑郁治疗与常规治疗(TAU)相比效果如何?种族、疾病严重程度和遗传面板范围如何影响结果?本系统综述和荟萃分析包括13项随机对照试验(2013-2024),比较px引导治疗与TAU治疗MDD。PubMed、Ovid Embase、Ovid Medline、Ovid PsycINFO和Cochrane Library的检索截止到2024年12月。结果包括8周和12周的缓解率和缓解率。亚组分析检查了种族和重度抑郁症的严重程度。累积荟萃分析评估了基因面板的大小。计算95% ci的合并风险比(rr)来估计总体效果。发现spgx引导治疗显著提高了8周(RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.43)和12周(RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.43)的缓解率。缓解在8周时显著(RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19至1.57),但在12周时不显著(RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93至2.61)。与非亚洲国家亚组相比,亚洲国家亚组的获益似乎更强(相互作用p=0.02),但由于亚洲国家样本量较小,这需要验证。在MDD非特异性和MDD难治疗亚组之间没有观察到显著的亚组差异,尽管后者在8周时与TAU相比,pgx引导治疗在缓解率和缓解率方面都有显着改善。累积分析显示,效应大小趋于稳定,更宽的面板提供最小的增量收益。结论spgx引导治疗似乎在抗抑郁疗效方面具有中等优势,在亚洲和难以治疗的亚组中具有潜在优势。药物代谢的遗传和种族差异强调了针对人群的方法的必要性。虽然多基因面板显示临床效益趋于稳定,但表明成本效益优化至关重要。未来的研究应该解决不良事件、扩大小组的成本效益、长期缓解结果和治疗效果,更精确地分层疾病严重程度,以最大限度地提高临床相关性。普洛斯彼罗注册号crd42024570014。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.","authors":"Yuan Zhang,Yiyuan Gao,Yazhu Zou,Yu Ye,Fugui Jiang,Zuxing Wang,Jian Qiu,Zhili Zou","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","url":null,"abstract":"QUESTIONHow effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSISThis systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.FINDINGSPGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.CONCLUSIONSPGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERCRD42024570014.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144959889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726
Yuan Zhang, Yiyuan Gao, Yazhu Zou, Yu Ye, Fugui Jiang, Zuxing Wang, Jian Qiu, Zhili Zou
Question: How effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?
Study selection and analysis: This systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.
Findings: PGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.
Conclusions: PGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.
Prospero registration number: CRD42024570014.
问题:在重度抑郁症(MDD)中,药物基因组学(PGx)指导的抗抑郁治疗与常规治疗(TAU)相比效果如何?种族、疾病严重程度和遗传面板范围如何影响结果?研究选择和分析:本系统综述和荟萃分析包括13项随机对照试验(2013-2024),比较px引导治疗与TAU治疗重度抑郁症。PubMed、Ovid Embase、Ovid Medline、Ovid PsycINFO和Cochrane Library的检索截止到2024年12月。结果包括8周和12周的缓解率和缓解率。亚组分析检查了种族和重度抑郁症的严重程度。累积荟萃分析评估了基因面板的大小。计算95% ci的合并风险比(rr)来估计总体效果。结果:pgx引导治疗显著提高了8周(RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.43)和12周(RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.43)的缓解率。缓解在8周时显著(RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19至1.57),但在12周时不显著(RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93至2.61)。与非亚洲国家亚组相比,亚洲国家亚组的获益似乎更强(相互作用p=0.02),但由于亚洲国家样本量较小,这需要验证。在MDD非特异性和MDD难治疗亚组之间没有观察到显著的亚组差异,尽管后者在8周时与TAU相比,pgx引导治疗在缓解率和缓解率方面都有显着改善。累积分析显示,效应大小趋于稳定,更宽的面板提供最小的增量收益。结论:pgx引导的治疗似乎在抗抑郁疗效方面提供了适度的益处,在亚洲和难以治疗的亚组中具有潜在的优势。药物代谢的遗传和种族差异强调了针对人群的方法的必要性。虽然多基因面板显示临床效益趋于稳定,但表明成本效益优化至关重要。未来的研究应该解决不良事件、扩大小组的成本效益、长期缓解结果和治疗效果,更精确地分层疾病严重程度,以最大限度地提高临床相关性。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024570014。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.","authors":"Yuan Zhang, Yiyuan Gao, Yazhu Zou, Yu Ye, Fugui Jiang, Zuxing Wang, Jian Qiu, Zhili Zou","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>How effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>PGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024570014.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382523/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144980640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-21DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301752
Petra Steinacker,Leonie Werner,Alexander Tarabuko,Ilyas Al-Ali,Naguib Mechawar,Christopher R Pryce,Nadia Cattane,Giulia Poggi,Mhd Rami Al Shweiki,Heiko Graf,Henning Großkopf,Steffen Halbgebauer,Patrick Oeckl,Lorenzo Barba,Laura Meier,Samir Abu-Rumeileh,Hugh Marston,Klaus D Bornemann,Bastian Hengerer,Karin M Danzer,Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona,Markus Otto
BACKGROUNDDecreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of synaptic proteins, possibly reflecting impaired synaptic function, have been observed in major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVETo investigate the diagnostic utility of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor (SNARE) complex protein, synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25), for MDD.METHODSOverall, 208 participants with one of MDD, schizophrenia (SCZ) or bipolar disorder (BD), and healthy controls (HCs) were retrospectively enrolled. CSF levels of SNAP-25 were assessed relative to MDD characteristics and the diagnostic potential was analysed. In subgroups of patients, CSF levels of presynaptic neurexin 3 (NRXN3), postsynaptic neurogranin (NRGN) and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers were measured for comparison.FINDINGSSNAP-25 levels, but not the levels of the other synaptic markers, were significantly decreased in MDD compared with HCs, allowing for discrimination with 68% sensitivity and 67% specificity. SNAP-25 was not associated with MDD severity or antidepressant medication. Compared with HCs, SCZ also displayed decreased SNAP-25 enabling discrimination with 64% sensitivity and 77% specificity. There were strong correlations between levels of synaptic proteins and established Alzheimer pathology markers, with subtle differences in the association pattern between disorders.DISCUSSIONOur data suggest that SNAP-25, NRXN3 and NRGN versus beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau protein 181 (ptau) are regulated differentially across psychiatric disorders and that SNAP-25 has a moderate diagnostic potential for MDD and SCZ. We propose that CSF SNAP-25 level might represent an integrated readout of reduced synaptic function, rather than of synaptic degeneration, in MDD. Further studies are needed to analyse whether this potential can be increased by using multimarker measurements and whether it will be possible to subtype psychiatric disorders according to synaptic involvement in pathophysiology.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSSNAP-25 and other synaptic proteins in CSF might aid diagnosis and subtyping of MDD and SCZ. The current development of sensitive methods to also determine synaptic proteins in blood samples from patients will advance the validation of the biomarker potential and contribute to understanding of synaptic involvement in the pathophysiology of MDD and SCZ.
{"title":"Evidence for reduced synaptic protein SNAP-25 in cerebrospinal fluid in major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.","authors":"Petra Steinacker,Leonie Werner,Alexander Tarabuko,Ilyas Al-Ali,Naguib Mechawar,Christopher R Pryce,Nadia Cattane,Giulia Poggi,Mhd Rami Al Shweiki,Heiko Graf,Henning Großkopf,Steffen Halbgebauer,Patrick Oeckl,Lorenzo Barba,Laura Meier,Samir Abu-Rumeileh,Hugh Marston,Klaus D Bornemann,Bastian Hengerer,Karin M Danzer,Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona,Markus Otto","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301752","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDDecreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of synaptic proteins, possibly reflecting impaired synaptic function, have been observed in major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVETo investigate the diagnostic utility of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor (SNARE) complex protein, synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25), for MDD.METHODSOverall, 208 participants with one of MDD, schizophrenia (SCZ) or bipolar disorder (BD), and healthy controls (HCs) were retrospectively enrolled. CSF levels of SNAP-25 were assessed relative to MDD characteristics and the diagnostic potential was analysed. In subgroups of patients, CSF levels of presynaptic neurexin 3 (NRXN3), postsynaptic neurogranin (NRGN) and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers were measured for comparison.FINDINGSSNAP-25 levels, but not the levels of the other synaptic markers, were significantly decreased in MDD compared with HCs, allowing for discrimination with 68% sensitivity and 67% specificity. SNAP-25 was not associated with MDD severity or antidepressant medication. Compared with HCs, SCZ also displayed decreased SNAP-25 enabling discrimination with 64% sensitivity and 77% specificity. There were strong correlations between levels of synaptic proteins and established Alzheimer pathology markers, with subtle differences in the association pattern between disorders.DISCUSSIONOur data suggest that SNAP-25, NRXN3 and NRGN versus beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau protein 181 (ptau) are regulated differentially across psychiatric disorders and that SNAP-25 has a moderate diagnostic potential for MDD and SCZ. We propose that CSF SNAP-25 level might represent an integrated readout of reduced synaptic function, rather than of synaptic degeneration, in MDD. Further studies are needed to analyse whether this potential can be increased by using multimarker measurements and whether it will be possible to subtype psychiatric disorders according to synaptic involvement in pathophysiology.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSSNAP-25 and other synaptic proteins in CSF might aid diagnosis and subtyping of MDD and SCZ. The current development of sensitive methods to also determine synaptic proteins in blood samples from patients will advance the validation of the biomarker potential and contribute to understanding of synaptic involvement in the pathophysiology of MDD and SCZ.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144930326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-17DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301307
Daniel McDuff, Isaac Galatzer-Levy, Seamus Thomson, Andrew Barakat, Conor Heneghan, Samy Abdel-Ghaffar, Jacob Sunshine, Ming-Zher Poh, Lindsey Sunden, John B Hernandez, Allen Jiang, Xin Liu, Ari Winbush, Benjamin Nelson, Nicholas B Allen
Background: Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a measure of sympathetic arousal that has been linked to depression in laboratory experiments. However, the inability to measure EDA passively over time and in the real world has limited conclusions that can be drawn about EDA as an indicator of mental health status outside of controlled settings.
Objective: Recent smartwatches have begun to incorporate wrist-worn continuous EDA sensors that enable longitudinal measurement of sympathetic arousal in everyday life. This work (n=237, 4-week observation period) examines the association between passively collected, diurnal variations in EDA and symptoms of depression, anxiety and perceived stress in a large community sample.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomised study to investigate patterns and relationships between digital device use patterns, including sensor data from phones and wearables reflecting both behavioural and physiological processes, and self-reported measures of mental health and well-being. We recruited 395 participants who had a Fitbit Sense 2 device with the electrodermal sensor activated. We use a non-linear cosinor fitting method to estimate the difference in mesor, amplitude and phase, between the diurnal rhythms in heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) root mean square of successive differences, EDA, skin temperature and steps.
Findings: Subjects who exhibited elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms had higher tonic EDA, skin temperature and heart rate, despite not engaging in greater physical activity, compared with those that were not depressed or anxious. In contrast, subjects who exhibited elevated stress only exhibited higher skin temperature. Most strikingly, differences in EDA between those with high versus low symptoms were most prominent during the early morning. We did not observe amplitude or phase differences in the diurnal patterns.
Conclusions: Results indicate that participants with elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms have different diurnal physiological patterns. Specifically, EDA differences suggest elevated sympathetic activity throughout the day and in particular in the early morning.
Clinical implications: Our work suggests that electrodermal sensors may be practical and useful in measuring the physiological correlates of mental health symptoms in free-living contexts and that recent consumer smartwatches might be a tool for doing so.
背景:在实验室实验中,皮电活动(EDA)是一种与抑郁有关的交感神经觉醒的测量方法。然而,由于无法长期被动地在现实世界中测量EDA,因此在受控环境之外,EDA作为心理健康状况指标的结论有限。目的:最近的智能手表已经开始结合在手腕上的连续EDA传感器,可以在日常生活中纵向测量交感神经兴奋。这项工作(n=237, 4周观察期)在一个大的社区样本中检验了被动收集的EDA的日变化与抑郁、焦虑和感知压力症状之间的关系。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性、非随机研究,以调查数字设备使用模式之间的模式和关系,包括反映行为和生理过程的手机和可穿戴设备的传感器数据,以及自我报告的心理健康和福祉措施。我们招募了395名参与者,他们拥有激活皮肤电传感器的Fitbit Sense 2设备。我们使用非线性余弦拟合方法来估计心率(HR)、心率变异性(HRV)连续差的均方根、EDA、皮肤温度和步数的昼夜节律之间的中尺度、振幅和相位的差异。研究结果:与那些没有抑郁或焦虑的人相比,表现出抑郁和焦虑症状升高的受试者,尽管没有进行更多的体育活动,但其补益性EDA、皮肤温度和心率更高。相比之下,表现出压力升高的受试者只表现出更高的皮肤温度。最引人注目的是,高症状者和低症状者之间的EDA差异在清晨最为显著。我们没有观察到昼夜模式的振幅或相位差异。结论:结果表明抑郁和焦虑症状升高的参与者具有不同的日常生理模式。具体来说,EDA差异表明全天交感神经活动升高,尤其是在清晨。临床意义:我们的研究表明,在自由生活的环境下,皮肤电传感器在测量心理健康症状的生理相关性方面可能是实用和有用的,最近的消费者智能手表可能是一种工具。
{"title":"Evidence of differences in diurnal electrodermal, temperature and heart rate patterns by mental health status in free-living data.","authors":"Daniel McDuff, Isaac Galatzer-Levy, Seamus Thomson, Andrew Barakat, Conor Heneghan, Samy Abdel-Ghaffar, Jacob Sunshine, Ming-Zher Poh, Lindsey Sunden, John B Hernandez, Allen Jiang, Xin Liu, Ari Winbush, Benjamin Nelson, Nicholas B Allen","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301307","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a measure of sympathetic arousal that has been linked to depression in laboratory experiments. However, the inability to measure EDA passively over time and in the real world has limited conclusions that can be drawn about EDA as an indicator of mental health status outside of controlled settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent smartwatches have begun to incorporate wrist-worn continuous EDA sensors that enable longitudinal measurement of sympathetic arousal in everyday life. This work (n=237, 4-week observation period) examines the association between passively collected, diurnal variations in EDA and symptoms of depression, anxiety and perceived stress in a large community sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, non-randomised study to investigate patterns and relationships between digital device use patterns, including sensor data from phones and wearables reflecting both behavioural and physiological processes, and self-reported measures of mental health and well-being. We recruited 395 participants who had a Fitbit Sense 2 device with the electrodermal sensor activated. We use a non-linear cosinor fitting method to estimate the difference in mesor, amplitude and phase, between the diurnal rhythms in heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) root mean square of successive differences, EDA, skin temperature and steps.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Subjects who exhibited elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms had higher tonic EDA, skin temperature and heart rate, despite not engaging in greater physical activity, compared with those that were not depressed or anxious. In contrast, subjects who exhibited elevated stress only exhibited higher skin temperature. Most strikingly, differences in EDA between those with high versus low symptoms were most prominent during the early morning. We did not observe amplitude or phase differences in the diurnal patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate that participants with elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms have different diurnal physiological patterns. Specifically, EDA differences suggest elevated sympathetic activity throughout the day and in particular in the early morning.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our work suggests that electrodermal sensors may be practical and useful in measuring the physiological correlates of mental health symptoms in free-living contexts and that recent consumer smartwatches might be a tool for doing so.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359479/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144877040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301785
Gin S Malhi, Kinga Szymaniak, Gurubhaskar Shivakumar, Erica Bell
This editorial discusses the importance of maintaining diversity within science, noting especially its significance to research in psychiatry. It follows a recent directive that was issued by the US administration that places unreasonable constraints on US government-funded scientific inquiry. The article draws attention to the harmful intended consequences of the directive. It also discusses its unintended consequences, which are likely to be damaging because heterogeneity is inherent in nature, and recognition of diversity in medical science helps achieve specificity. This is essential for the detection and diagnosis of disease and for tailoring therapies and developing targeted treatments.
{"title":"'Viewpoint Diversity': heterogeneity is critical to the integrity of science.","authors":"Gin S Malhi, Kinga Szymaniak, Gurubhaskar Shivakumar, Erica Bell","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301785","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This editorial discusses the importance of maintaining diversity within science, noting especially its significance to research in psychiatry. It follows a recent directive that was issued by the US administration that places unreasonable constraints on US government-funded scientific inquiry. The article draws attention to the harmful intended consequences of the directive. It also discusses its unintended consequences, which are likely to be damaging because heterogeneity is inherent in nature, and recognition of diversity in medical science helps achieve specificity. This is essential for the detection and diagnosis of disease and for tailoring therapies and developing targeted treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352178/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144849955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-07DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757
André Sjöberg,Per Liv,Maria Lindström
BACKGROUNDIndividuals with serious mental illness (SMI) living in supported accommodation often lead lonely and sedentary lives. Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) is a collaborative, person-centred, activity-oriented and recovery-oriented intervention that integrates outreach rehabilitation efforts into routine practices. This intervention aims to enhance personal recovery and quality of life by promoting engagement in meaningful everyday activities within real-life contexts.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effectiveness of ELR on personal recovery and quality of life among residents with SMI in supported accommodation, compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU).METHODSThis was a pragmatic, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT05056415) conducted in Sweden between August 2021 and June 2024. The RCT included 60 housing units (clusters) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ELR or TAU. Data were collected by independent, blinded assessors, with partial blinding of residents. The primary outcome, Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), was assessed at the individual level and analysed using a mixed-effects model and an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach by a statistician blinded to the allocation.FINDINGSParticipants in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in ReQoL scores at 6 months compared with the control group (20.1, 95% CI: 15.8 to 24.4), with a statistically significant between-group difference (p<0.001). The ITT analysis included 60 housing units with 161 participants (86 men and 72 women), of whom 90 were allocated to ELR (33 units) and 71 to TAU (27 units). The overall attrition rate was 24% in both groups, and no major adverse events were reported.CONCLUSIONSThese findings indicate that ELR is an effective intervention with a clinically relevant impact on recovering quality of life for individuals with SMI living in supported accommodation. While these results should be interpreted within the context of the Swedish system, they contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting recovery-oriented and activity-oriented interventions in supported accommodation.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSResponsive, person-centred, goal-oriented activity training, grounded in collaborative alliance, represents a valid strategy for recovery-oriented interventions. While multilevel approaches must be tailored to specific contexts, the integration of occupational therapists may provide clinical benefits in supported accommodation.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERNCT05056415.
{"title":"Effect of Everyday Life Rehabilitation on recovering quality of life in individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"André Sjöberg,Per Liv,Maria Lindström","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDIndividuals with serious mental illness (SMI) living in supported accommodation often lead lonely and sedentary lives. Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) is a collaborative, person-centred, activity-oriented and recovery-oriented intervention that integrates outreach rehabilitation efforts into routine practices. This intervention aims to enhance personal recovery and quality of life by promoting engagement in meaningful everyday activities within real-life contexts.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effectiveness of ELR on personal recovery and quality of life among residents with SMI in supported accommodation, compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU).METHODSThis was a pragmatic, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT05056415) conducted in Sweden between August 2021 and June 2024. The RCT included 60 housing units (clusters) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ELR or TAU. Data were collected by independent, blinded assessors, with partial blinding of residents. The primary outcome, Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), was assessed at the individual level and analysed using a mixed-effects model and an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach by a statistician blinded to the allocation.FINDINGSParticipants in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in ReQoL scores at 6 months compared with the control group (20.1, 95% CI: 15.8 to 24.4), with a statistically significant between-group difference (p<0.001). The ITT analysis included 60 housing units with 161 participants (86 men and 72 women), of whom 90 were allocated to ELR (33 units) and 71 to TAU (27 units). The overall attrition rate was 24% in both groups, and no major adverse events were reported.CONCLUSIONSThese findings indicate that ELR is an effective intervention with a clinically relevant impact on recovering quality of life for individuals with SMI living in supported accommodation. While these results should be interpreted within the context of the Swedish system, they contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting recovery-oriented and activity-oriented interventions in supported accommodation.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSResponsive, person-centred, goal-oriented activity training, grounded in collaborative alliance, represents a valid strategy for recovery-oriented interventions. While multilevel approaches must be tailored to specific contexts, the integration of occupational therapists may provide clinical benefits in supported accommodation.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERNCT05056415.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144802605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDWhile 17% of new mothers experience symptoms of postpartum depression (PPD), emotional distress is more widespread in the postpartum period. This descriptive study described item-level responses on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to better understand common postpartum experiences.METHODSWe analysed EPDS data from 170 218 childbirths (2015-2021) in the Danish HOPE cohort collected during routine postpartum visits. We described the distribution of responses to each item and total scores.RESULTSMost mothers reported mild or no symptoms. Items on self-blame, anxiety and feeling overwhelmed showed large variation. Self-harm thoughts were rare (1.7%). The median total score was 4 (IQR 2-7); 7.8% scored ≥11, indicating possible PPD.DISCUSSIONDiverse emotional responses are common postpartum and often reflect normal adjustment. Item-level insights may help reduce stigma and support open dialogue around maternal mental health.
{"title":"How common are postpartum depressive thoughts and feelings? Item-level distribution of population-based screening records.","authors":"Mette-Marie Zacher Kjeldsen,Sofie Egsgaard,Anja Friis Elliott,Trine Munk-Olsen","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301819","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDWhile 17% of new mothers experience symptoms of postpartum depression (PPD), emotional distress is more widespread in the postpartum period. This descriptive study described item-level responses on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to better understand common postpartum experiences.METHODSWe analysed EPDS data from 170 218 childbirths (2015-2021) in the Danish HOPE cohort collected during routine postpartum visits. We described the distribution of responses to each item and total scores.RESULTSMost mothers reported mild or no symptoms. Items on self-blame, anxiety and feeling overwhelmed showed large variation. Self-harm thoughts were rare (1.7%). The median total score was 4 (IQR 2-7); 7.8% scored ≥11, indicating possible PPD.DISCUSSIONDiverse emotional responses are common postpartum and often reflect normal adjustment. Item-level insights may help reduce stigma and support open dialogue around maternal mental health.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144787230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BACKGROUNDThe rates of compulsory admission and treatment (CAT) are rising in mental health systems in the UK. Persistent disparities have been reported among migrants, and black and ethnic minorities in Europe and North America for decades. Lived experience data can provide novel insights to reduce coercive care.METHODSWe purposively sampled people within 2 years of receiving CAT, to maximise diversity by age, sex, ethnicity and different 'sections' of the Mental Health Act (England and Wales) from eight health systems in England. Using participatory photovoice workshops, we assembled images, captions and reflective narratives, which were transcribed and subjected to thematic and intersectional analyses. The interpretation privileged lived experiences of participants and peer researchers alongside the research team. Preventive insights informed a logic model to reduce CAT.RESULTSForty-eight ethnically diverse people contributed over 500 images and 30 hours of recorded narratives. A significant proportion of participants reported multimorbidity, adverse childhood experiences and carer roles. Their experiences indicated insufficient co-ordination to prevent CAT despite early help seeking; they were not taken seriously or believed when seeking help. Dismissive responses and even hostility from professionals and unnecessary police involvement were distressing, stigmatising and risked criminalisation. Participants wanted more (a) advocacy given in crisis, (b) trauma-informed therapeutic and creative support from inpatient into community settings, (c) family and carer involvement and (d) more information about how to negotiate care options, appeals, restriction and seclusion. Practitioners were felt to lack the essential skills to care for racialised and traumatised people subjected to CAT.CONCLUSIONSWe propose a lived experience logic model for the practice, policy and legislative solutions to reduce epistemic injustice, CAT and criminalising care.
{"title":"Racialised experience of detention under the Mental Health Act: a photovoice investigation.","authors":"Kamaldeep Bhui,Roisin Mooney,Doreen Joseph,Rose McCabe,Karen Newbigging,Paul McCrone,Raghu Raghavan,Frank Keating,Nusrat Husain, ","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe rates of compulsory admission and treatment (CAT) are rising in mental health systems in the UK. Persistent disparities have been reported among migrants, and black and ethnic minorities in Europe and North America for decades. Lived experience data can provide novel insights to reduce coercive care.METHODSWe purposively sampled people within 2 years of receiving CAT, to maximise diversity by age, sex, ethnicity and different 'sections' of the Mental Health Act (England and Wales) from eight health systems in England. Using participatory photovoice workshops, we assembled images, captions and reflective narratives, which were transcribed and subjected to thematic and intersectional analyses. The interpretation privileged lived experiences of participants and peer researchers alongside the research team. Preventive insights informed a logic model to reduce CAT.RESULTSForty-eight ethnically diverse people contributed over 500 images and 30 hours of recorded narratives. A significant proportion of participants reported multimorbidity, adverse childhood experiences and carer roles. Their experiences indicated insufficient co-ordination to prevent CAT despite early help seeking; they were not taken seriously or believed when seeking help. Dismissive responses and even hostility from professionals and unnecessary police involvement were distressing, stigmatising and risked criminalisation. Participants wanted more (a) advocacy given in crisis, (b) trauma-informed therapeutic and creative support from inpatient into community settings, (c) family and carer involvement and (d) more information about how to negotiate care options, appeals, restriction and seclusion. Practitioners were felt to lack the essential skills to care for racialised and traumatised people subjected to CAT.CONCLUSIONSWe propose a lived experience logic model for the practice, policy and legislative solutions to reduce epistemic injustice, CAT and criminalising care.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144787231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}