首页 > 最新文献

BMJ mental health最新文献

英文 中文
Are reasons for first using cannabis associated with subsequent cannabis consumption (standard THC units) and psychopathology? 首次使用大麻的原因是否与随后的大麻消费(标准四氢大麻酚单位)和精神病理有关?
IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810
Edoardo Spinazzola, Hannah Degen, Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Giulia Trotta, Edward Chesney, Zhikun Li, Luis Alameda, Bok Man Leung, Yifei Lang, Andrea Quattrone, Diego Quattrone, Erika Castrignanò, Kim Wolff, Robin Murray, Tom P Freeman, Marta Di Forti

Background: Reasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.

Objectives: We examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Methods: We analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.

Findings: Participants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).

Conclusions: Initiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.

Clinical implications: Asking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.

背景:首次使用大麻的原因(RFUC)可能影响后来的使用模式和心理健康结果。然而,有限的研究深入探讨了自我用药与社会rfus,以及它们与大麻使用模式和普通人群精神病理的关系。目的:我们研究了RFUCs及其与(1)持续使用大麻的原因,(2)每周THC (δ -9-四氢大麻酚)单位消耗量和(3)偏执、焦虑和抑郁症状的关系。方法:我们分析了来自Cannabis&Me (CAMe)人口调查(2022年3月至2024年7月)的数据,包括2573名(75.9%)目前和816名(24.1%)18岁及以上的大麻使用者。研究结果:参与者报告平均每周消耗206个THC单位(SD=268)。因焦虑(β=36.22, p=3.3e-03)、抑郁(β=40.37, p=1.74e-03)或因为“家庭成员正在使用大麻”(β=87.43, p=1.22e-09)而开始使用大麻与每周THC单位较高相关。RFUC缓解身体不适(β=8.89, p=4.12e-07)、疼痛(β=7.24, p=5.56e-06)、焦虑(β=9.67, p=1.63e-16)、抑郁(β=9.12, p=1.21e-13)和轻微精神病症状(β=16.46, p=1.2e-04)与偏执得分较高有关。焦虑和抑郁也有类似的关联。相反,为了好玩(β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05)或好奇(β=-2.61, p=5e-03)而开始的人偏执和焦虑程度较低。“无聊”的RFUC与抑郁增加有关(β=1.09, p=3.8e-03)。结论:为自我用药而开始使用大麻与更高的四氢大麻酚平均消费量、焦虑、抑郁和偏执增加有关。临床意义:询问个人为什么他们第一次使用大麻可以作为一种具有成本效益的筛查工具,以确定哪些人可以从监测、支持或转介到干预服务中受益。
{"title":"Are reasons for first using cannabis associated with subsequent cannabis consumption (standard THC units) and psychopathology?","authors":"Edoardo Spinazzola, Hannah Degen, Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Giulia Trotta, Edward Chesney, Zhikun Li, Luis Alameda, Bok Man Leung, Yifei Lang, Andrea Quattrone, Diego Quattrone, Erika Castrignanò, Kim Wolff, Robin Murray, Tom P Freeman, Marta Di Forti","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Asking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144980578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are reasons for first using cannabis associated with subsequent cannabis consumption (standard THC units) and psychopathology? 首次使用大麻的原因是否与随后的大麻消费(标准四氢大麻酚单位)和精神病理有关?
0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810
Edoardo Spinazzola,Hannah Degen,Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman,Giulia Trotta,Edward Chesney,Zhikun Li,Luis Alameda,Bok Man Leung,Yifei Lang,Andrea Quattrone,Diego Quattrone,Erika Castrignanò,Kim Wolff,Robin Murray,Tom P Freeman,Marta Di Forti
BACKGROUNDReasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.OBJECTIVESWe examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.METHODSWe analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.FINDINGSParticipants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).CONCLUSIONSInitiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSAsking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.
背景首次使用大麻的原因(RFUC)可能会影响后来的使用模式和心理健康结果。然而,有限的研究深入探讨了自我用药与社会rfus,以及它们与大麻使用模式和普通人群精神病理的关系。目的:我们研究了RFUCs及其与(1)持续使用大麻的原因、(2)每周THC (δ -9-四氢大麻酚)单位消耗量和(3)偏执、焦虑和抑郁症状的关系。方法我们分析了大麻和我(CAMe)人口调查(2022年3月至2024年7月)的数据,包括2573名(75.9%)目前和816名(24.1%)18岁及以上的大麻使用者。研究结果:参与者报告平均每周消耗206个四氢大麻酚单位(SD=268)。因焦虑(β=36.22, p=3.3e-03)、抑郁(β=40.37, p=1.74e-03)或因为“家庭成员正在使用大麻”(β=87.43, p=1.22e-09)而开始使用大麻与每周THC单位较高相关。RFUC缓解身体不适(β=8.89, p=4.12e-07)、疼痛(β=7.24, p=5.56e-06)、焦虑(β=9.67, p=1.63e-16)、抑郁(β=9.12, p=1.21e-13)和轻微精神病症状(β=16.46, p=1.2e-04)与偏执得分较高有关。焦虑和抑郁也有类似的关联。相反,为了好玩(β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05)或好奇(β=-2.61, p=5e-03)而开始的人偏执和焦虑程度较低。“无聊”的RFUC与抑郁增加有关(β=1.09, p=3.8e-03)。结论为自我用药而开始使用大麻与四氢大麻酚平均消费量增加、焦虑、抑郁和偏执增加有关。临床意义询问个人为什么第一次使用大麻可以作为一种具有成本效益的筛查工具,以确定哪些人可以从监测、支持或转介到干预服务中受益。
{"title":"Are reasons for first using cannabis associated with subsequent cannabis consumption (standard THC units) and psychopathology?","authors":"Edoardo Spinazzola,Hannah Degen,Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman,Giulia Trotta,Edward Chesney,Zhikun Li,Luis Alameda,Bok Man Leung,Yifei Lang,Andrea Quattrone,Diego Quattrone,Erika Castrignanò,Kim Wolff,Robin Murray,Tom P Freeman,Marta Di Forti","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301810","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDReasons for first using cannabis (RFUC) may influence later use patterns and mental health outcomes. However, limited research has explored self-medication versus social RFUCs in depth, and their associations with cannabis use patterns and psychopathology in the general population.OBJECTIVESWe examined RFUCs and their associations with (1) reasons for continuing cannabis use, (2) weekly THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) unit consumption and (3) symptoms of paranoia, anxiety and depressive symptoms.METHODSWe analysed data from the Cannabis&Me (CAMe) population survey (March 2022-July 2024), including 2573 (75.9%) current and 816 (24.1%) past cannabis users aged 18 years or older.FINDINGSParticipants reported a mean weekly consumption of 206 THC units (SD=268). Initiating cannabis use for anxiety (β=36.22, p=3.3e-03), depression (β=40.37, p=1.74e-03) or because 'family members were using it' (β=87.43, p=1.22e-09) was associated with higher weekly THC units. RFUC to relieve physical discomfort (β=8.89, p=4.12e-07), pain (β=7.24, p=5.56e-06), anxiety (β=9.67, p=1.63e-16), depression (β=9.12, p=1.21e-13) and minor psychotic symptoms (β=16.46, p=1.2e-04) were linked to higher paranoia scores. Similar associations were observed for anxiety and depression. Conversely, starting for fun (β=-3.71, p=3.49e-05) or curiosity (β=-2.61, p=5e-03) was associated with lower paranoia and anxiety. RFUC for 'boredom' was linked to increased depression (β=1.09, p=3.8e-03).CONCLUSIONSInitiating cannabis use for self-medication is associated with higher average THC consumption, and increased anxiety, depression and paranoia.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSAsking individuals why they first used cannabis may serve as a cost-effective screening tool to identify those who could benefit from monitoring, support, or referral to intervention services.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144959888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses. 药物基因组学指导与非指导抗抑郁治疗在重度抑郁症中的比较效果:来自亚组和累积荟萃分析的新见解
0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726
Yuan Zhang,Yiyuan Gao,Yazhu Zou,Yu Ye,Fugui Jiang,Zuxing Wang,Jian Qiu,Zhili Zou
QUESTIONHow effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSISThis systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.FINDINGSPGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.CONCLUSIONSPGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERCRD42024570014.
在重度抑郁症(MDD)中,药物基因组学(PGx)指导的抗抑郁治疗与常规治疗(TAU)相比效果如何?种族、疾病严重程度和遗传面板范围如何影响结果?本系统综述和荟萃分析包括13项随机对照试验(2013-2024),比较px引导治疗与TAU治疗MDD。PubMed、Ovid Embase、Ovid Medline、Ovid PsycINFO和Cochrane Library的检索截止到2024年12月。结果包括8周和12周的缓解率和缓解率。亚组分析检查了种族和重度抑郁症的严重程度。累积荟萃分析评估了基因面板的大小。计算95% ci的合并风险比(rr)来估计总体效果。发现spgx引导治疗显著提高了8周(RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.43)和12周(RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.43)的缓解率。缓解在8周时显著(RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19至1.57),但在12周时不显著(RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93至2.61)。与非亚洲国家亚组相比,亚洲国家亚组的获益似乎更强(相互作用p=0.02),但由于亚洲国家样本量较小,这需要验证。在MDD非特异性和MDD难治疗亚组之间没有观察到显著的亚组差异,尽管后者在8周时与TAU相比,pgx引导治疗在缓解率和缓解率方面都有显着改善。累积分析显示,效应大小趋于稳定,更宽的面板提供最小的增量收益。结论spgx引导治疗似乎在抗抑郁疗效方面具有中等优势,在亚洲和难以治疗的亚组中具有潜在优势。药物代谢的遗传和种族差异强调了针对人群的方法的必要性。虽然多基因面板显示临床效益趋于稳定,但表明成本效益优化至关重要。未来的研究应该解决不良事件、扩大小组的成本效益、长期缓解结果和治疗效果,更精确地分层疾病严重程度,以最大限度地提高临床相关性。普洛斯彼罗注册号crd42024570014。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.","authors":"Yuan Zhang,Yiyuan Gao,Yazhu Zou,Yu Ye,Fugui Jiang,Zuxing Wang,Jian Qiu,Zhili Zou","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","url":null,"abstract":"QUESTIONHow effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSISThis systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.FINDINGSPGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.CONCLUSIONSPGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERCRD42024570014.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144959889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses. 药物基因组学指导与非指导抗抑郁治疗在重度抑郁症中的比较效果:来自亚组和累积荟萃分析的新见解
IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726
Yuan Zhang, Yiyuan Gao, Yazhu Zou, Yu Ye, Fugui Jiang, Zuxing Wang, Jian Qiu, Zhili Zou

Question: How effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?

Study selection and analysis: This systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.

Findings: PGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.

Conclusions: PGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024570014.

问题:在重度抑郁症(MDD)中,药物基因组学(PGx)指导的抗抑郁治疗与常规治疗(TAU)相比效果如何?种族、疾病严重程度和遗传面板范围如何影响结果?研究选择和分析:本系统综述和荟萃分析包括13项随机对照试验(2013-2024),比较px引导治疗与TAU治疗重度抑郁症。PubMed、Ovid Embase、Ovid Medline、Ovid PsycINFO和Cochrane Library的检索截止到2024年12月。结果包括8周和12周的缓解率和缓解率。亚组分析检查了种族和重度抑郁症的严重程度。累积荟萃分析评估了基因面板的大小。计算95% ci的合并风险比(rr)来估计总体效果。结果:pgx引导治疗显著提高了8周(RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.43)和12周(RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.43)的缓解率。缓解在8周时显著(RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19至1.57),但在12周时不显著(RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93至2.61)。与非亚洲国家亚组相比,亚洲国家亚组的获益似乎更强(相互作用p=0.02),但由于亚洲国家样本量较小,这需要验证。在MDD非特异性和MDD难治疗亚组之间没有观察到显著的亚组差异,尽管后者在8周时与TAU相比,pgx引导治疗在缓解率和缓解率方面都有显着改善。累积分析显示,效应大小趋于稳定,更宽的面板提供最小的增量收益。结论:pgx引导的治疗似乎在抗抑郁疗效方面提供了适度的益处,在亚洲和难以治疗的亚组中具有潜在的优势。药物代谢的遗传和种族差异强调了针对人群的方法的必要性。虽然多基因面板显示临床效益趋于稳定,但表明成本效益优化至关重要。未来的研究应该解决不良事件、扩大小组的成本效益、长期缓解结果和治疗效果,更精确地分层疾病严重程度,以最大限度地提高临床相关性。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024570014。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided versus unguided antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder: new insights from subgroup and cumulative meta-analyses.","authors":"Yuan Zhang, Yiyuan Gao, Yazhu Zou, Yu Ye, Fugui Jiang, Zuxing Wang, Jian Qiu, Zhili Zou","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301726","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>How effective is pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided antidepressant treatment compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU) in major depressive disorder (MDD), and how do ethnicity, disease severity and genetic panel scope influence outcomes?</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis comprised 13 randomised controlled trials (2013-2024) comparing PGx-guided therapy with TAU in MDD. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2024. Outcomes included response and remission rates at 8 and 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses examined ethnicity and MDD severity. Cumulative meta-analyses assessed gene panel size. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the overall effect.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>PGx-guided treatment significantly improved response rates at 8 weeks (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.43) and 12 weeks (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43). Remission was significant at 8 weeks (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.57) but not at 12 weeks (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.61). Benefits appeared stronger in the Asian country subgroup compared with non-Asian country subgroup (interaction p=0.02), but this requires validation due to the smaller Asian country sample size. No significant subgroup differences were observed between the MDD not-specified and MDD difficult-to-treat subgroups, despite the latter demonstrating significant improvements in both response and remission rates with PGx-guided treatment compared with TAU at 8 weeks. Cumulative analyses showed effect sizes plateaued, with broader panels offering minimal incremental gains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PGx-guided treatment seems to offer moderate benefits for antidepressant efficacy, with potential advantages in Asian and difficult-to-treat subgroups. Genetic and ethnic variability in drug metabolism underscores the need for population-specific approaches. While multigene panels show clinical benefits plateau, suggesting cost-benefit optimisation is critical. Future research should address adverse events, the cost-effectiveness of expanded panels, long-term remission outcomes and treatment efficacy across more precisely stratified disease severity levels to maximise clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024570014.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382523/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144980640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence for reduced synaptic protein SNAP-25 in cerebrospinal fluid in major depressive disorder and schizophrenia. 重度抑郁症和精神分裂症患者脑脊液中突触蛋白SNAP-25减少的证据
0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301752
Petra Steinacker,Leonie Werner,Alexander Tarabuko,Ilyas Al-Ali,Naguib Mechawar,Christopher R Pryce,Nadia Cattane,Giulia Poggi,Mhd Rami Al Shweiki,Heiko Graf,Henning Großkopf,Steffen Halbgebauer,Patrick Oeckl,Lorenzo Barba,Laura Meier,Samir Abu-Rumeileh,Hugh Marston,Klaus D Bornemann,Bastian Hengerer,Karin M Danzer,Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona,Markus Otto
BACKGROUNDDecreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of synaptic proteins, possibly reflecting impaired synaptic function, have been observed in major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVETo investigate the diagnostic utility of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor (SNARE) complex protein, synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25), for MDD.METHODSOverall, 208 participants with one of MDD, schizophrenia (SCZ) or bipolar disorder (BD), and healthy controls (HCs) were retrospectively enrolled. CSF levels of SNAP-25 were assessed relative to MDD characteristics and the diagnostic potential was analysed. In subgroups of patients, CSF levels of presynaptic neurexin 3 (NRXN3), postsynaptic neurogranin (NRGN) and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers were measured for comparison.FINDINGSSNAP-25 levels, but not the levels of the other synaptic markers, were significantly decreased in MDD compared with HCs, allowing for discrimination with 68% sensitivity and 67% specificity. SNAP-25 was not associated with MDD severity or antidepressant medication. Compared with HCs, SCZ also displayed decreased SNAP-25 enabling discrimination with 64% sensitivity and 77% specificity. There were strong correlations between levels of synaptic proteins and established Alzheimer pathology markers, with subtle differences in the association pattern between disorders.DISCUSSIONOur data suggest that SNAP-25, NRXN3 and NRGN versus beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau protein 181 (ptau) are regulated differentially across psychiatric disorders and that SNAP-25 has a moderate diagnostic potential for MDD and SCZ. We propose that CSF SNAP-25 level might represent an integrated readout of reduced synaptic function, rather than of synaptic degeneration, in MDD. Further studies are needed to analyse whether this potential can be increased by using multimarker measurements and whether it will be possible to subtype psychiatric disorders according to synaptic involvement in pathophysiology.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSSNAP-25 and other synaptic proteins in CSF might aid diagnosis and subtyping of MDD and SCZ. The current development of sensitive methods to also determine synaptic proteins in blood samples from patients will advance the validation of the biomarker potential and contribute to understanding of synaptic involvement in the pathophysiology of MDD and SCZ.
研究背景:在重度抑郁症(MDD)中观察到脑脊液(CSF)突触蛋白水平下降,可能反映了突触功能受损。目的探讨可溶性n -乙基马来酰亚胺敏感因子附着受体(SNARE)复合物蛋白,即突触体相关蛋白25 kDa (SNAP-25)在MDD诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性纳入208名重度抑郁症、精神分裂症(SCZ)或双相情感障碍(BD)患者和健康对照(hc)。评估与MDD特征相关的CSF SNAP-25水平,并分析诊断潜力。在患者亚组中,测量脑脊液中突触前神经素3 (NRXN3)、突触后神经粒蛋白(NRGN)和阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的水平进行比较。与hcc相比,MDD患者的ssnap -25水平显著降低,而其他突触标记物的水平则没有显著降低,这使得ssnap -25的鉴别灵敏度为68%,特异性为67%。SNAP-25与重度抑郁症的严重程度或抗抑郁药物无关。与hcc相比,SCZ也显示SNAP-25使识别降低,敏感性为64%,特异性为77%。突触蛋白水平与已建立的阿尔茨海默病病理标志物之间存在很强的相关性,而不同疾病之间的关联模式存在细微差异。我们的数据表明,SNAP-25、NRXN3和NRGN对β -淀粉样蛋白和磷酸化tau蛋白181 (ptau)的调节在精神疾病中存在差异,并且SNAP-25在MDD和SCZ中具有中等诊断潜力。我们提出脑脊液SNAP-25水平可能代表MDD中突触功能减少的综合读数,而不是突触变性。需要进一步的研究来分析这种潜力是否可以通过使用多标记物测量来增加,以及是否有可能根据突触参与病理生理学来划分精神疾病的亚型。临床意义CSF中的ssnap -25和其他突触蛋白可能有助于MDD和SCZ的诊断和分型。目前,检测患者血液样本中突触蛋白的灵敏方法的发展将推进生物标志物潜力的验证,并有助于理解突触参与MDD和SCZ的病理生理。
{"title":"Evidence for reduced synaptic protein SNAP-25 in cerebrospinal fluid in major depressive disorder and schizophrenia.","authors":"Petra Steinacker,Leonie Werner,Alexander Tarabuko,Ilyas Al-Ali,Naguib Mechawar,Christopher R Pryce,Nadia Cattane,Giulia Poggi,Mhd Rami Al Shweiki,Heiko Graf,Henning Großkopf,Steffen Halbgebauer,Patrick Oeckl,Lorenzo Barba,Laura Meier,Samir Abu-Rumeileh,Hugh Marston,Klaus D Bornemann,Bastian Hengerer,Karin M Danzer,Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona,Markus Otto","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301752","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDDecreased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of synaptic proteins, possibly reflecting impaired synaptic function, have been observed in major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVETo investigate the diagnostic utility of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment receptor (SNARE) complex protein, synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25), for MDD.METHODSOverall, 208 participants with one of MDD, schizophrenia (SCZ) or bipolar disorder (BD), and healthy controls (HCs) were retrospectively enrolled. CSF levels of SNAP-25 were assessed relative to MDD characteristics and the diagnostic potential was analysed. In subgroups of patients, CSF levels of presynaptic neurexin 3 (NRXN3), postsynaptic neurogranin (NRGN) and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers were measured for comparison.FINDINGSSNAP-25 levels, but not the levels of the other synaptic markers, were significantly decreased in MDD compared with HCs, allowing for discrimination with 68% sensitivity and 67% specificity. SNAP-25 was not associated with MDD severity or antidepressant medication. Compared with HCs, SCZ also displayed decreased SNAP-25 enabling discrimination with 64% sensitivity and 77% specificity. There were strong correlations between levels of synaptic proteins and established Alzheimer pathology markers, with subtle differences in the association pattern between disorders.DISCUSSIONOur data suggest that SNAP-25, NRXN3 and NRGN versus beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau protein 181 (ptau) are regulated differentially across psychiatric disorders and that SNAP-25 has a moderate diagnostic potential for MDD and SCZ. We propose that CSF SNAP-25 level might represent an integrated readout of reduced synaptic function, rather than of synaptic degeneration, in MDD. Further studies are needed to analyse whether this potential can be increased by using multimarker measurements and whether it will be possible to subtype psychiatric disorders according to synaptic involvement in pathophysiology.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSSNAP-25 and other synaptic proteins in CSF might aid diagnosis and subtyping of MDD and SCZ. The current development of sensitive methods to also determine synaptic proteins in blood samples from patients will advance the validation of the biomarker potential and contribute to understanding of synaptic involvement in the pathophysiology of MDD and SCZ.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144930326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence of differences in diurnal electrodermal, temperature and heart rate patterns by mental health status in free-living data. 自由生活数据中心理健康状况对日皮肤电、体温和心率模式差异的证据
IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-17 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301307
Daniel McDuff, Isaac Galatzer-Levy, Seamus Thomson, Andrew Barakat, Conor Heneghan, Samy Abdel-Ghaffar, Jacob Sunshine, Ming-Zher Poh, Lindsey Sunden, John B Hernandez, Allen Jiang, Xin Liu, Ari Winbush, Benjamin Nelson, Nicholas B Allen

Background: Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a measure of sympathetic arousal that has been linked to depression in laboratory experiments. However, the inability to measure EDA passively over time and in the real world has limited conclusions that can be drawn about EDA as an indicator of mental health status outside of controlled settings.

Objective: Recent smartwatches have begun to incorporate wrist-worn continuous EDA sensors that enable longitudinal measurement of sympathetic arousal in everyday life. This work (n=237, 4-week observation period) examines the association between passively collected, diurnal variations in EDA and symptoms of depression, anxiety and perceived stress in a large community sample.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomised study to investigate patterns and relationships between digital device use patterns, including sensor data from phones and wearables reflecting both behavioural and physiological processes, and self-reported measures of mental health and well-being. We recruited 395 participants who had a Fitbit Sense 2 device with the electrodermal sensor activated. We use a non-linear cosinor fitting method to estimate the difference in mesor, amplitude and phase, between the diurnal rhythms in heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) root mean square of successive differences, EDA, skin temperature and steps.

Findings: Subjects who exhibited elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms had higher tonic EDA, skin temperature and heart rate, despite not engaging in greater physical activity, compared with those that were not depressed or anxious. In contrast, subjects who exhibited elevated stress only exhibited higher skin temperature. Most strikingly, differences in EDA between those with high versus low symptoms were most prominent during the early morning. We did not observe amplitude or phase differences in the diurnal patterns.

Conclusions: Results indicate that participants with elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms have different diurnal physiological patterns. Specifically, EDA differences suggest elevated sympathetic activity throughout the day and in particular in the early morning.

Clinical implications: Our work suggests that electrodermal sensors may be practical and useful in measuring the physiological correlates of mental health symptoms in free-living contexts and that recent consumer smartwatches might be a tool for doing so.

背景:在实验室实验中,皮电活动(EDA)是一种与抑郁有关的交感神经觉醒的测量方法。然而,由于无法长期被动地在现实世界中测量EDA,因此在受控环境之外,EDA作为心理健康状况指标的结论有限。目的:最近的智能手表已经开始结合在手腕上的连续EDA传感器,可以在日常生活中纵向测量交感神经兴奋。这项工作(n=237, 4周观察期)在一个大的社区样本中检验了被动收集的EDA的日变化与抑郁、焦虑和感知压力症状之间的关系。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性、非随机研究,以调查数字设备使用模式之间的模式和关系,包括反映行为和生理过程的手机和可穿戴设备的传感器数据,以及自我报告的心理健康和福祉措施。我们招募了395名参与者,他们拥有激活皮肤电传感器的Fitbit Sense 2设备。我们使用非线性余弦拟合方法来估计心率(HR)、心率变异性(HRV)连续差的均方根、EDA、皮肤温度和步数的昼夜节律之间的中尺度、振幅和相位的差异。研究结果:与那些没有抑郁或焦虑的人相比,表现出抑郁和焦虑症状升高的受试者,尽管没有进行更多的体育活动,但其补益性EDA、皮肤温度和心率更高。相比之下,表现出压力升高的受试者只表现出更高的皮肤温度。最引人注目的是,高症状者和低症状者之间的EDA差异在清晨最为显著。我们没有观察到昼夜模式的振幅或相位差异。结论:结果表明抑郁和焦虑症状升高的参与者具有不同的日常生理模式。具体来说,EDA差异表明全天交感神经活动升高,尤其是在清晨。临床意义:我们的研究表明,在自由生活的环境下,皮肤电传感器在测量心理健康症状的生理相关性方面可能是实用和有用的,最近的消费者智能手表可能是一种工具。
{"title":"Evidence of differences in diurnal electrodermal, temperature and heart rate patterns by mental health status in free-living data.","authors":"Daniel McDuff, Isaac Galatzer-Levy, Seamus Thomson, Andrew Barakat, Conor Heneghan, Samy Abdel-Ghaffar, Jacob Sunshine, Ming-Zher Poh, Lindsey Sunden, John B Hernandez, Allen Jiang, Xin Liu, Ari Winbush, Benjamin Nelson, Nicholas B Allen","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301307","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a measure of sympathetic arousal that has been linked to depression in laboratory experiments. However, the inability to measure EDA passively over time and in the real world has limited conclusions that can be drawn about EDA as an indicator of mental health status outside of controlled settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent smartwatches have begun to incorporate wrist-worn continuous EDA sensors that enable longitudinal measurement of sympathetic arousal in everyday life. This work (n=237, 4-week observation period) examines the association between passively collected, diurnal variations in EDA and symptoms of depression, anxiety and perceived stress in a large community sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, non-randomised study to investigate patterns and relationships between digital device use patterns, including sensor data from phones and wearables reflecting both behavioural and physiological processes, and self-reported measures of mental health and well-being. We recruited 395 participants who had a Fitbit Sense 2 device with the electrodermal sensor activated. We use a non-linear cosinor fitting method to estimate the difference in mesor, amplitude and phase, between the diurnal rhythms in heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV) root mean square of successive differences, EDA, skin temperature and steps.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Subjects who exhibited elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms had higher tonic EDA, skin temperature and heart rate, despite not engaging in greater physical activity, compared with those that were not depressed or anxious. In contrast, subjects who exhibited elevated stress only exhibited higher skin temperature. Most strikingly, differences in EDA between those with high versus low symptoms were most prominent during the early morning. We did not observe amplitude or phase differences in the diurnal patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate that participants with elevated depressive and anxiety symptoms have different diurnal physiological patterns. Specifically, EDA differences suggest elevated sympathetic activity throughout the day and in particular in the early morning.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Our work suggests that electrodermal sensors may be practical and useful in measuring the physiological correlates of mental health symptoms in free-living contexts and that recent consumer smartwatches might be a tool for doing so.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359479/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144877040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'Viewpoint Diversity': heterogeneity is critical to the integrity of science. “观点多样性”:异质性对科学的完整性至关重要。
IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301785
Gin S Malhi, Kinga Szymaniak, Gurubhaskar Shivakumar, Erica Bell

This editorial discusses the importance of maintaining diversity within science, noting especially its significance to research in psychiatry. It follows a recent directive that was issued by the US administration that places unreasonable constraints on US government-funded scientific inquiry. The article draws attention to the harmful intended consequences of the directive. It also discusses its unintended consequences, which are likely to be damaging because heterogeneity is inherent in nature, and recognition of diversity in medical science helps achieve specificity. This is essential for the detection and diagnosis of disease and for tailoring therapies and developing targeted treatments.

这篇社论讨论了保持科学多样性的重要性,特别指出了它对精神病学研究的重要性。此前,美国政府最近发布了一项指令,对美国政府资助的科学研究施加了不合理的限制。文章提请注意该指令的有害预期后果。它还讨论了其意想不到的后果,这些后果可能是破坏性的,因为异质性是自然固有的,而承认医学科学的多样性有助于实现特异性。这对于疾病的检测和诊断以及定制治疗方法和开发有针对性的治疗方法至关重要。
{"title":"'Viewpoint Diversity': heterogeneity is critical to the integrity of science.","authors":"Gin S Malhi, Kinga Szymaniak, Gurubhaskar Shivakumar, Erica Bell","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301785","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This editorial discusses the importance of maintaining diversity within science, noting especially its significance to research in psychiatry. It follows a recent directive that was issued by the US administration that places unreasonable constraints on US government-funded scientific inquiry. The article draws attention to the harmful intended consequences of the directive. It also discusses its unintended consequences, which are likely to be damaging because heterogeneity is inherent in nature, and recognition of diversity in medical science helps achieve specificity. This is essential for the detection and diagnosis of disease and for tailoring therapies and developing targeted treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352178/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144849955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Everyday Life Rehabilitation on recovering quality of life in individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. 日常生活康复对支持住宿的严重精神疾病患者恢复生活质量的影响:一项实用的聚类随机对照试验
0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757
André Sjöberg,Per Liv,Maria Lindström
BACKGROUNDIndividuals with serious mental illness (SMI) living in supported accommodation often lead lonely and sedentary lives. Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) is a collaborative, person-centred, activity-oriented and recovery-oriented intervention that integrates outreach rehabilitation efforts into routine practices. This intervention aims to enhance personal recovery and quality of life by promoting engagement in meaningful everyday activities within real-life contexts.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effectiveness of ELR on personal recovery and quality of life among residents with SMI in supported accommodation, compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU).METHODSThis was a pragmatic, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT05056415) conducted in Sweden between August 2021 and June 2024. The RCT included 60 housing units (clusters) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ELR or TAU. Data were collected by independent, blinded assessors, with partial blinding of residents. The primary outcome, Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), was assessed at the individual level and analysed using a mixed-effects model and an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach by a statistician blinded to the allocation.FINDINGSParticipants in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in ReQoL scores at 6 months compared with the control group (20.1, 95% CI: 15.8 to 24.4), with a statistically significant between-group difference (p<0.001). The ITT analysis included 60 housing units with 161 participants (86 men and 72 women), of whom 90 were allocated to ELR (33 units) and 71 to TAU (27 units). The overall attrition rate was 24% in both groups, and no major adverse events were reported.CONCLUSIONSThese findings indicate that ELR is an effective intervention with a clinically relevant impact on recovering quality of life for individuals with SMI living in supported accommodation. While these results should be interpreted within the context of the Swedish system, they contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting recovery-oriented and activity-oriented interventions in supported accommodation.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSResponsive, person-centred, goal-oriented activity training, grounded in collaborative alliance, represents a valid strategy for recovery-oriented interventions. While multilevel approaches must be tailored to specific contexts, the integration of occupational therapists may provide clinical benefits in supported accommodation.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERNCT05056415.
患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人生活在支持的住宿中,往往过着孤独和久坐不动的生活。日常生活康复(ELR)是一种协作性的、以人为本的、以活动为导向的、以康复为导向的干预,它将外展康复工作纳入日常实践。这种干预旨在通过促进在现实生活中有意义的日常活动的参与来提高个人的康复和生活质量。目的评价ELR与常规治疗(TAU)相比,对支持型住宿重度精神障碍患者个人康复和生活质量的影响。方法:这是一项实用的、平行组、集群随机对照试验(RCT) (NCT05056415),于2021年8月至2024年6月在瑞典进行。随机对照试验包括60个住房单元(组),随机分配(1:1)接受ELR或TAU。数据由独立的盲法评估者收集,对居民进行部分盲法评估。主要结局是恢复生活质量(ReQoL-20),在个体水平上进行评估,并由统计学家使用混合效应模型和意向治疗(ITT)方法进行分析。结果干预组患者在6个月时的ReQoL评分较对照组有显著提高(20.1,95% CI: 15.8 ~ 24.4),组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。ITT分析包括60个住房单元,161名参与者(86名男性和72名女性),其中90名分配给ELR(33个单元),71名分配给TAU(27个单元)。两组患者的总流失率均为24%,无重大不良事件报告。结论:ELR是一种有效的干预措施,对生活在支持性住宿中的重度精神障碍患者的生活质量恢复具有临床相关的影响。虽然这些结果应该在瑞典系统的背景下解释,但它们有助于越来越多的证据支持在支持住宿中以恢复为导向和以活动为导向的干预措施。临床意义响应性的、以人为本的、目标导向的活动训练,以协作联盟为基础,代表了一种有效的康复导向干预策略。虽然多层次的方法必须根据具体情况量身定制,但职业治疗师的整合可能会在支持住宿方面提供临床益处。试验注册号05056415。
{"title":"Effect of Everyday Life Rehabilitation on recovering quality of life in individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"André Sjöberg,Per Liv,Maria Lindström","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301757","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDIndividuals with serious mental illness (SMI) living in supported accommodation often lead lonely and sedentary lives. Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) is a collaborative, person-centred, activity-oriented and recovery-oriented intervention that integrates outreach rehabilitation efforts into routine practices. This intervention aims to enhance personal recovery and quality of life by promoting engagement in meaningful everyday activities within real-life contexts.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effectiveness of ELR on personal recovery and quality of life among residents with SMI in supported accommodation, compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU).METHODSThis was a pragmatic, parallel-group, cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT05056415) conducted in Sweden between August 2021 and June 2024. The RCT included 60 housing units (clusters) randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ELR or TAU. Data were collected by independent, blinded assessors, with partial blinding of residents. The primary outcome, Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-20), was assessed at the individual level and analysed using a mixed-effects model and an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach by a statistician blinded to the allocation.FINDINGSParticipants in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in ReQoL scores at 6 months compared with the control group (20.1, 95% CI: 15.8 to 24.4), with a statistically significant between-group difference (p<0.001). The ITT analysis included 60 housing units with 161 participants (86 men and 72 women), of whom 90 were allocated to ELR (33 units) and 71 to TAU (27 units). The overall attrition rate was 24% in both groups, and no major adverse events were reported.CONCLUSIONSThese findings indicate that ELR is an effective intervention with a clinically relevant impact on recovering quality of life for individuals with SMI living in supported accommodation. While these results should be interpreted within the context of the Swedish system, they contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting recovery-oriented and activity-oriented interventions in supported accommodation.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONSResponsive, person-centred, goal-oriented activity training, grounded in collaborative alliance, represents a valid strategy for recovery-oriented interventions. While multilevel approaches must be tailored to specific contexts, the integration of occupational therapists may provide clinical benefits in supported accommodation.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERNCT05056415.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144802605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How common are postpartum depressive thoughts and feelings? Item-level distribution of population-based screening records. 产后抑郁的想法和感觉有多普遍?基于人群的筛查记录的项目水平分布。
0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301819
Mette-Marie Zacher Kjeldsen,Sofie Egsgaard,Anja Friis Elliott,Trine Munk-Olsen
BACKGROUNDWhile 17% of new mothers experience symptoms of postpartum depression (PPD), emotional distress is more widespread in the postpartum period. This descriptive study described item-level responses on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to better understand common postpartum experiences.METHODSWe analysed EPDS data from 170 218 childbirths (2015-2021) in the Danish HOPE cohort collected during routine postpartum visits. We described the distribution of responses to each item and total scores.RESULTSMost mothers reported mild or no symptoms. Items on self-blame, anxiety and feeling overwhelmed showed large variation. Self-harm thoughts were rare (1.7%). The median total score was 4 (IQR 2-7); 7.8% scored ≥11, indicating possible PPD.DISCUSSIONDiverse emotional responses are common postpartum and often reflect normal adjustment. Item-level insights may help reduce stigma and support open dialogue around maternal mental health.
虽然17%的新妈妈会出现产后抑郁(PPD)的症状,但情绪困扰在产后时期更为普遍。本描述性研究描述了爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)的项目水平反应,以更好地了解常见的产后经历。方法:我们分析了丹麦HOPE队列在常规产后随访期间收集的170 218例分娩(2015-2021)的EPDS数据。我们描述了对每个项目的反应分布和总分。结果大多数母亲报告症状轻微或无症状。自责、焦虑和不知所措的项目差异很大。有自残想法的人很少(1.7%)。总分中位数为4分(IQR 2-7);7.8%评分≥11分,提示可能有PPD。不同的情绪反应是常见的产后,往往反映正常的调整。项目层面的见解可能有助于减少耻辱感,并支持围绕孕产妇心理健康展开公开对话。
{"title":"How common are postpartum depressive thoughts and feelings? Item-level distribution of population-based screening records.","authors":"Mette-Marie Zacher Kjeldsen,Sofie Egsgaard,Anja Friis Elliott,Trine Munk-Olsen","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301819","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDWhile 17% of new mothers experience symptoms of postpartum depression (PPD), emotional distress is more widespread in the postpartum period. This descriptive study described item-level responses on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to better understand common postpartum experiences.METHODSWe analysed EPDS data from 170 218 childbirths (2015-2021) in the Danish HOPE cohort collected during routine postpartum visits. We described the distribution of responses to each item and total scores.RESULTSMost mothers reported mild or no symptoms. Items on self-blame, anxiety and feeling overwhelmed showed large variation. Self-harm thoughts were rare (1.7%). The median total score was 4 (IQR 2-7); 7.8% scored ≥11, indicating possible PPD.DISCUSSIONDiverse emotional responses are common postpartum and often reflect normal adjustment. Item-level insights may help reduce stigma and support open dialogue around maternal mental health.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144787230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Racialised experience of detention under the Mental Health Act: a photovoice investigation. 根据《精神卫生法》被拘留的种族化经历:一项照相语音调查。
0 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655
Kamaldeep Bhui,Roisin Mooney,Doreen Joseph,Rose McCabe,Karen Newbigging,Paul McCrone,Raghu Raghavan,Frank Keating,Nusrat Husain,
BACKGROUNDThe rates of compulsory admission and treatment (CAT) are rising in mental health systems in the UK. Persistent disparities have been reported among migrants, and black and ethnic minorities in Europe and North America for decades. Lived experience data can provide novel insights to reduce coercive care.METHODSWe purposively sampled people within 2 years of receiving CAT, to maximise diversity by age, sex, ethnicity and different 'sections' of the Mental Health Act (England and Wales) from eight health systems in England. Using participatory photovoice workshops, we assembled images, captions and reflective narratives, which were transcribed and subjected to thematic and intersectional analyses. The interpretation privileged lived experiences of participants and peer researchers alongside the research team. Preventive insights informed a logic model to reduce CAT.RESULTSForty-eight ethnically diverse people contributed over 500 images and 30 hours of recorded narratives. A significant proportion of participants reported multimorbidity, adverse childhood experiences and carer roles. Their experiences indicated insufficient co-ordination to prevent CAT despite early help seeking; they were not taken seriously or believed when seeking help. Dismissive responses and even hostility from professionals and unnecessary police involvement were distressing, stigmatising and risked criminalisation. Participants wanted more (a) advocacy given in crisis, (b) trauma-informed therapeutic and creative support from inpatient into community settings, (c) family and carer involvement and (d) more information about how to negotiate care options, appeals, restriction and seclusion. Practitioners were felt to lack the essential skills to care for racialised and traumatised people subjected to CAT.CONCLUSIONSWe propose a lived experience logic model for the practice, policy and legislative solutions to reduce epistemic injustice, CAT and criminalising care.
背景:在英国的精神卫生系统中,强制入院和治疗(CAT)的比率正在上升。据报道,几十年来,欧洲和北美的移民、黑人和少数族裔之间一直存在差距。生活经验数据可以为减少强制护理提供新的见解。方法我们有目的地对接受CAT治疗两年内的人进行抽样,以最大限度地提高年龄、性别、种族和英格兰和威尔士精神卫生法不同“部分”的多样性。我们利用参与式的“照片声音”工作坊,将图像、文字说明和反思性叙述集合在一起,进行转录并进行主题分析和交叉分析。这种解释将参与者和同行研究人员的生活经历与研究团队联系在一起。预防性洞察告知逻辑模型以减少CAT。结果48名不同种族的人贡献了500多张图片和30个小时的记录叙述。相当大比例的参与者报告了多重疾病、不良的童年经历和照顾者角色。他们的经验表明,尽管早期寻求帮助,但在预防CAT方面协调不足;在寻求帮助时,他们没有被认真对待或相信。专业人员的轻蔑反应,甚至敌意,以及不必要的警察介入,都令人痛苦、耻辱,并有被定罪的风险。与会者希望(a)在危机中提供更多的宣传,(b)住院患者在社区环境中提供创伤知情的治疗和创造性支持,(c)家庭和护理人员的参与,以及(d)更多关于如何协商护理选择、上诉、限制和隔离的信息。从业人员被认为缺乏必要的技能来照顾遭受酷刑的种族化和创伤的人。结论我们提出了一个生活经验逻辑模型,用于实践、政策和立法解决方案,以减少认知不公、CAT和刑事化护理。
{"title":"Racialised experience of detention under the Mental Health Act: a photovoice investigation.","authors":"Kamaldeep Bhui,Roisin Mooney,Doreen Joseph,Rose McCabe,Karen Newbigging,Paul McCrone,Raghu Raghavan,Frank Keating,Nusrat Husain, ","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe rates of compulsory admission and treatment (CAT) are rising in mental health systems in the UK. Persistent disparities have been reported among migrants, and black and ethnic minorities in Europe and North America for decades. Lived experience data can provide novel insights to reduce coercive care.METHODSWe purposively sampled people within 2 years of receiving CAT, to maximise diversity by age, sex, ethnicity and different 'sections' of the Mental Health Act (England and Wales) from eight health systems in England. Using participatory photovoice workshops, we assembled images, captions and reflective narratives, which were transcribed and subjected to thematic and intersectional analyses. The interpretation privileged lived experiences of participants and peer researchers alongside the research team. Preventive insights informed a logic model to reduce CAT.RESULTSForty-eight ethnically diverse people contributed over 500 images and 30 hours of recorded narratives. A significant proportion of participants reported multimorbidity, adverse childhood experiences and carer roles. Their experiences indicated insufficient co-ordination to prevent CAT despite early help seeking; they were not taken seriously or believed when seeking help. Dismissive responses and even hostility from professionals and unnecessary police involvement were distressing, stigmatising and risked criminalisation. Participants wanted more (a) advocacy given in crisis, (b) trauma-informed therapeutic and creative support from inpatient into community settings, (c) family and carer involvement and (d) more information about how to negotiate care options, appeals, restriction and seclusion. Practitioners were felt to lack the essential skills to care for racialised and traumatised people subjected to CAT.CONCLUSIONSWe propose a lived experience logic model for the practice, policy and legislative solutions to reduce epistemic injustice, CAT and criminalising care.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144787231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BMJ mental health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1