British paramedic journal最新文献

Introduction: Menopause is a key workplace issue. Many women will experience symptoms through their later working life. The ambulance service constitutes an employment setting that, dependent on the roles of female staff, can impact on the severity of menopause symptoms and experiences (Prothero et al., 2021). This study aimed to explore female ambulance staff experiences of the menopause transition and suggest ways to improve support offerings.

Methods: A qualitative interpretive approach was adopted, involving 12 UK ambulance services. Participants were identified via purposive sampling, and semi-structured interviews were conducted from February to July 2022 via an online platform or telephone. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

Results: Twenty-two female participants, aged between 42 and 62 years, were interviewed, and represented all phases of the menopause: peri-menopause (n = 9); menopause (n = 5); post-menopause (n = 3); and unsure (n = 5). Fourteen participants had front-line (patient-facing) or emergency operation centre-based roles, while seven were employed in service support roles. Ten themes were identified: impact on work role; awareness and preparedness for menopause transition; personal impact of symptoms; desired support; appropriate sickness and menopause policy; managerial development; compassion and dignity; impact of working environment; impact on safety; and lack of choice. Lack of understanding and support from colleagues and line managers were identified as the key issues. This is included under the managerial development and compassion and dignity themes.

Conclusions: The varying range of menopausal symptoms and their severity impacted on women's performance at work. The experience of working while going through the menopause could be challenging. Employers should adopt a menopause policy which includes training and awareness for all staff, and suitable for front-line as well as service support staff. There is a need to create a culture where the menopause is not taboo, and women feel able to talk about their symptoms.

Background: Patients presenting to the ambulance services with cardiovascular complaints are common, and as such, represent a notable proportion of paramedic clinical practice. Numerous texts refer to a system-based approach to cardiovascular assessment, however the application by paramedics is scarcely researched. As such, this article aims to quantify paramedic confidence levels regarding an examination of a patient with a cardiovascular complaint.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted, recruiting paramedics from one ambulance trust within the United Kingdom and analysing their confidence levels of assessing a patient with a cardiovascular complaint. Paramedics were recruited using purposive sampling and asked to complete an online questionnaire exploring their confidence levels among cardiovascular assessments, which were subsequently quantified to summarise confidence levels expressed by these respondents.

Results: A total of 331 responses across one ambulance service were received in April 2021. Of these, 90.3% (299/331) reported a high level of confidence with the general cardiovascular assessment. Throughout all individual elements of assessment, over 50% of respondents indicated they feel confident with the examination, except when assessing heaves and thrills where 56.2% (185/329) and 55.1% (182/330) of respondents disagreed with feeling confident, respectively. A strong correlation was seen throughout the results between confidence levels and the reported occurrence of each type of assessment, which was demonstrated using Spearman's rank-order correlation.

Conclusions: High confidence levels for a cardiovascular examination were reported among the respondents of this survey. Paramedics have shown good confidence among all areas of a cardiovascular assessment, except with palpating the chest for heaves and thrills. There is an evident link between reported confidence levels and how often these assessments are completed, however there is still room for additional training and research within this area.

Background: Paramedic prescribing has been permitted in legislation from 2018. In 2019 one of the first cohorts of paramedic prescribers in the country was invited to share their experiences, thoughts and perceptions around the new and evolving role of paramedic prescribing practice.

Aim: To explore the opinions of student and newly qualified paramedic prescribers regarding the impact and effectiveness of paramedic independent prescribing on their clinical practice.

Design and setting: A qualitative study was undertaken within the North East of England with a group of experienced paramedics undertaking non-medical prescribing education.

Methods: A focus group and dyad interview were undertaken with a purposive sample of paramedics recruited from a higher education institution providing V300 independent and supplementary prescribing education. The focus group was undertaken with paramedics on the non-medical prescribing (NMP) programme of study. The dyad interview was undertaken with participants once qualified as prescribers, and actively prescribing. The focus group and interview were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis to identify key themes.

Results: A total of n = 7 and n = 2 paramedics undertook the focus group and dyad interview, respectively. Paramedics in this sample represented a range of paramedic practice areas. Paramedic NMP students noted four key themes around role, expectations, governance and opportunities and challenges in relation to prescribing practice. The returning sample of paramedics, now practising as prescribers, noted themes of organisational and infrastructure challenges, monitoring of prescribing practice and the evolution of paramedic roles.

Conclusion: Paramedic prescribing is rapidly expanding and evolving into new clinical areas. As such, careful consideration should be given to not only the resourcing of prescribers as individuals, but also the wider organisational and technological support and structures needed to be in place to allow paramedic prescribers to fulfil their roles and utilise their advanced practice skills.

Introduction: The main pre-hospital screening tool used for stroke in Ireland and the United Kingdom is the FAST (face, arms, speech, time) test. However, posterior circulation stroke (PCS) patients may be FAST negative on exam, presenting with sudden dizziness, headaches, visual problems, nausea and vomiting and balance/co-ordination problems. There is a lack of research into paramedic recognition of PCS, and this study sought to evaluate recognition rates among paramedics (Ps) and advanced paramedics (APs) in Ireland.

Methods: A cross-sectional sequential exploratory design was chosen. An anonymous online survey was carried out, which informed focus group discussions. The survey contained six clinical vignettes, two of which were PCS presentations. Correct diagnosis, hospital destination and type of pre-alert were recorded. Focus groups were chaired by an independent moderator via Zoom. Recordings were transcribed and thematic analysis was carried out to create codes and themes.

Results: One hundred and fifty-one staff members (91 Ps, 60 APs) completed the survey (response rate 40%). Of these, 67% did not recognise PCS symptoms and 77% did not choose to transport to a stroke unit. For those correctly suspecting PCS, 42% requested resus at the stroke unit and 18% requested resus in the local emergency department (ED). Two focus groups of four practitioners (n = 8) took place. Three main themes were created: (1) comfort levels with posterior stroke, with subthemes of recognition and personal experiences; (2) education, with subthemes of clinical practice guideline (CPG) issues and training issues; and (3) hospital factors, with subthemes of pre-alerting and disconnect between hospital and emergency medical services. Participants were uncomfortable with PCS recognition and bypassing their local ED. More training was called for, with a dedicated CPG. Relationships with hospital staff affected willingness to pre-alert.

Conclusions: In this sample group, recognition of PCS and onward transfer to a stroke unit was low. Focus groups showed that practitioners were uncomfortable recognising PCS and bypassing a local ED without adequate training and a dedicated CPG. Relationships with hospital staff also affected pre-alert decisions.

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a time-sensitive medical emergency. There is international evidence to suggest that rural regions experience worse OHCA outcomes, such as reduced survival rates. The aim of this study was to quantitatively review and compare the OHCA response, treatment and pre-hospital outcomes in a single-centre ambulance service over a 1-year period in urban and rural areas.

Methods: This study used retrospective OHCA audit data from the North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, from April 2018 to April 2019, comparing OHCA response, treatment and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) data in relation to urban or rural classification status, using the UK government urban-rural classification tool.

Results: A total of 1295 urban cases and 319 rural cases were compared. Bystander public-access defibrillator (PAD) use was higher in rural areas in comparison to urban areas (20/319 (6.3%) vs 47/1295 (3.6%); p = 0.03). The mean ambulance response time was slower in rural areas (10:43 minutes (n = 319) (SD ± 8.2) vs 07:35 minutes (n = 1295) (SD ± 7.1); p = < 0.01). Despite this, overall ROSC rates at hospital were similar between the groups, with no statistically significant difference (rural: 87/319 (27.3%) vs urban: 409/1295 (31.6%); p = 0.14).A further sub-group analysis of initially shockable OHCA cases showed slower ambulance response times in rural areas (10:45 minutes (n = 68) (SD ± 12.3) vs 07:55 minutes (n = 245) (SD ± 5.5); p = < 0.01) and that rural cases experienced lower ROSC at hospital rates (31/68 (45.6%) vs 151/245 (61.6%); p = 0.02).

Conclusion: This report showed differences in OHCA response and outcomes between rural and urban settings. In the shockable OHCA sub-group analysis, rural areas had slower ambulance response times and lower ROSC rates. The longer ambulance response times in the rural shockable OHCA group could be a factor in the reduced ROSC rates. Linking hospital survival data should be used in future research to explore this area further.

Aim: The aim of this professional practice paper is to provide a critical commentary on displaced risk among perinatal and neonatal patients attended to by the ambulance service.

Background: NHS services across the United Kingdom are currently facing unprecedented demand and increased scrutiny in their ability to provide safe and personalised care to patients. While current focus in the system centres around addressing social care demand, hospital bed capacity, planned care waiting times, staffing and ambulance handover delays, a less explored cohort of patients impacted by the current healthcare crisis is perinatal and neonatal populations attended to by the ambulance service. Little focus has been paid within national agendas to the care provided to women and babies outside of planned maternity and obstetric care. A case is presented to highlight the importance of considering urgent and emergency maternity care provision provided by the ambulance service, and the impact of 'displaced risk' due to the current pressures within healthcare systems.

Conclusion: Placed in a national context, drawing upon current independent reviews into maternity services, national transformation agendas and the most recent MBRRACE-UK confidential enquiry into maternal deaths and morbidity, a case is made to commissioners and Integrated Care Systems to focus on and invest in the unplanned pre-hospital care of maternity and neonatal patients. Recognition of the ambulance service as a key provider of care to this cohort of patients is paramount, calling on services and systems to work together on realising and addressing displaced risk for perinatal populations across the United Kingdom. A system approach that acknowledges the need for high-quality care at every point of contact and equitability in access to services for pregnant, postpartum and neonatal patients is vital.

Background: Health inequalities and poorer outcomes have been identified for patients with dark skin tones. The reasons are multi-factorial, but may include delayed treatment due to a lack of recognition of early clinical signs of physiological deterioration. Within the medical literature there is a light skin tone bias, leading to healthcare professionals having insufficient knowledge regarding the assessment of patients with different skin tones, which may result in reduced confidence and create patient safety issues. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the confidence levels of healthcare professionals when assessing patients of different skin tones.

Methods: The methodology followed scoping review frameworks set out by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), the Joanna Briggs Institute (Peters et al., 2020) and the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (Tricco et al., 2018). Searches for literature were performed between February and June 2022 using electronic databases EBSCO (Academic Search Complete, the Allied Complementary Medicine Database, e-journals, MEDLINE, CINAHL), British Nursing Index (ProQuest), Scopus, Web of Science, Zetoc, UpToDate, Google Scholar, NICE Evidence, ResearchGate, Opengrey and the British Association of Dermatologists. No date range was specified, expanders were left on and the findings were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included papers were synthesised using narrative synthesis.

Results: Thirteen papers were identified, and the extracted data charted by the paper's origin, sample size, profession and confidence levels. Our synthesis revealed reduced confidence in assessing, managing and diagnosing skin conditions in dark skin tones. A lack of training was cited by different health professionals, but undertaking tailored training and experiential learning increased confidence.

Conclusions: There is a safety issue for patients with dark skin tones, as healthcare professionals lack clinical confidence in managing and treating all ethnicities equally. Tangible diversity within healthcare training is required, supported by inclusive skin tone imagery and appropriate terminology within medical literature.

Introduction: Mixed methods research, a methodology entailing the integration of qualitative and quantitative data within a single study, offers researchers the ability to investigate complex processes and systems in health and healthcare. The collective strength gained through the data combination can provide an enhanced understanding of research problems, providing an ideal solution to understanding complex clinical issues in a range of settings. In pre-hospital practice, where often uncontrollable variables and environmental considerations increase healthcare complexity, mixed methods has emerged as a valuable approach to research.

Aims: Given the exponential growth of pre-hospital mixed methods research since the publication of our first systematic review in 2014, we aim to provide an update. Our review will explore how mixed methods is utilised in pre-hospital research and identify what standards of reporting are achieved.

Methods: This systematic review update will search MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase and Scopus bibliographic databases from 1 January 2012 to 15 March 2023, using an updated pre-hospital search strategy. Study screening will be performed in duplicate. Articles reported in English, explicitly stating the use of 'mixed methods' in the pre-hospital ambulance setting, including helicopter emergency medical services and community first-responder services, will be included. Data related to underpinning philosophy or theoretical framework, rationale for utilising mixed methods, background of the corresponding author, mode of data integration, model of publication and adherence to reporting standards, utilising the good reporting of a mixed methods study (GRAMMS) guidelines, will be extracted and analysed. All extracted data from study articles will be summarised in a table, allowing analysis of included studies against specified criteria.