Jessy Warner-Cohen, Jyothi Jose, Muhammad Wasif Saif
{"title":"Years of Fight against Pancreatic Cancer by RGB: Lessons to be Learnt.","authors":"Jessy Warner-Cohen, Jyothi Jose, Muhammad Wasif Saif","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"3 Suppl 2","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903894/pdf/nihms-1658898.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25406158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Social Distancing and the Power of Touch.","authors":"Shamsah Lakhani, Muhammad Wasif Saif","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"3 2","pages":"85-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7725141/pdf/nihms-1648119.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38698804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Olger Nano, Maria J Nieto, Muhammad Wasif Saif, Maher Tarabichi
Uterine sarcomas are a rare group of malignancies that account for less than 10% of all uterine malignancies. They are histologically diverse and fall into two broad groups: mesenchymal and epithelial tumors. The treatment in both these groups is marked by high failure rates and quick progression of disease. Patients with stage I to II with resectable disease benefit from operative cytoreduction. Those with advanced stages, benefit from chemotherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy. Our research in this paper looks at the number of LMS cases at our institution, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center in Brooklyn, NY for a period of 20 years from 1996 until 2015 and assesses our cohort's age at diagnosis and their survival in accordance to grade and stage of diagnosis. Our findings suggest that disease stage is a strong prognostic factor with good survival rates in stage I and II, with higher incidence in African-American women. All LMS patients with distant metastasis died within five years.
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Gynecological Uterine Sarcomas: Leiomyosarcomas and other Histological Subtypes at a Single Institution from 1996 to 2015.","authors":"Olger Nano, Maria J Nieto, Muhammad Wasif Saif, Maher Tarabichi","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uterine sarcomas are a rare group of malignancies that account for less than 10% of all uterine malignancies. They are histologically diverse and fall into two broad groups: mesenchymal and epithelial tumors. The treatment in both these groups is marked by high failure rates and quick progression of disease. Patients with stage I to II with resectable disease benefit from operative cytoreduction. Those with advanced stages, benefit from chemotherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy. Our research in this paper looks at the number of LMS cases at our institution, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center in Brooklyn, NY for a period of 20 years from 1996 until 2015 and assesses our cohort's age at diagnosis and their survival in accordance to grade and stage of diagnosis. Our findings suggest that disease stage is a strong prognostic factor with good survival rates in stage I and II, with higher incidence in African-American women. All LMS patients with distant metastasis died within five years.</p>","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"3 Suppl 2","pages":"30-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903893/pdf/nihms-1662936.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25406159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James Newman, Nagashree Seetharamu, Muhammad Wasif Saif
{"title":"Burden of Proof: Evaluating the Efficacy of Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) in Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.","authors":"James Newman, Nagashree Seetharamu, Muhammad Wasif Saif","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"3 Suppl 2","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7769129/pdf/nihms-1650699.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39098728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-07DOI: 10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1006
Alexander Yu, S. Luikart, Gengming Huang, Song Han, Jianping Zhao, L. Soong, Jianli Dong
Overexpression/amplification of erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) is a major prognostic factor in gastroesophageal cancers; it is currently the only biomarker established for the selection of targeted therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Current standard procedure for determining ERBB2 status in such patients is immunohistochemistry (IHC), followed by in situ hybridization (ISH), when IHC result is equivocal. Insufficient knowledge regarding the utilities of chromosomal microarray (CMA) has hindered its use as an adjunct tool in ERBB2 analysis. Here, we performed CMA on 7 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GEA specimens previously tested by ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and evaluated the concordance and performance of CMA. CMA identified 4 (57.1%) samples with amplification of ERBB2, compared to 3 (42.9%) by FISH. CMA also detected several additional DNA copy number variants in these samples, which may have prognostic and therapeutic indications. Further case studies and clinical trials may provide evidence for the utility of CMA-based genomic studies in the management of patients with suspected ERBB2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
{"title":"ERBB2 FISH and Chromosome Microarray Testing of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomas at a Single Institution.","authors":"Alexander Yu, S. Luikart, Gengming Huang, Song Han, Jianping Zhao, L. Soong, Jianli Dong","doi":"10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1006","url":null,"abstract":"Overexpression/amplification of erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) is a major prognostic factor in gastroesophageal cancers; it is currently the only biomarker established for the selection of targeted therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Current standard procedure for determining ERBB2 status in such patients is immunohistochemistry (IHC), followed by in situ hybridization (ISH), when IHC result is equivocal. Insufficient knowledge regarding the utilities of chromosomal microarray (CMA) has hindered its use as an adjunct tool in ERBB2 analysis. Here, we performed CMA on 7 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GEA specimens previously tested by ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and evaluated the concordance and performance of CMA. CMA identified 4 (57.1%) samples with amplification of ERBB2, compared to 3 (42.9%) by FISH. CMA also detected several additional DNA copy number variants in these samples, which may have prognostic and therapeutic indications. Further case studies and clinical trials may provide evidence for the utility of CMA-based genomic studies in the management of patients with suspected ERBB2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88261802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hassan Aziz, Kamil Hanna, Muhammad Wasif Saif, Muhammad Ameen Rauf, Yuri Genyk, Mohd Raashid Sheikh
Introduction: Outcomes for hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis and sarcomatous disease processes are not well defined in literature. We sought to use a national database to identify outcomes in these patients compared to subset of patients more well studied in literature - primary Hepatocellular cancer patients and patients with colorectal metastasis.
Methods: We identified patients undergoing major hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) for primary hepatocellular cancer (HCC), sarcoma metastasis, breast cancer metastasis, and colorectal metastasis using NSQIP database. The Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission and complication rates.
Results: A total of 5580 patients underwent major hepatectomy during the study period. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis had higher incidence of in-hospital complications (37%) compared to sarcoma (29%), colon (26%), and HCC patients (24%) and 30-days readmission rate (37% vs. 29% - sarcoma vs. 26% - colon vs. 25% HCC). There was no difference in 30-days mortality among the groups.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing major hepatectomies for breast cancer metastasis and sarcoma are more likely to have adverse outcomes than compared to their counterparts. This difference highlights the lack of experience in managing breast cancer and sarcoma with metastatic disease to the liver. This also highlights the difference in tumor biology among all the lesions we studied. An extensive discussion should take place when dealing with breast and sarcoma lesions in the liver because of these outcomes.
文献中对乳腺癌转移和肉瘤性疾病过程的肝切除术的结果没有很好的定义。我们试图使用一个国家数据库来确定这些患者的预后,并将其与文献中研究得更充分的患者亚群(原发性肝细胞癌患者和结直肠转移患者)进行比较。方法:使用NSQIP数据库,对原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)、肉瘤转移、乳腺癌转移和结直肠癌转移患者进行大肝切除术(≥3节段)的研究。主要结局指标为30天死亡率。次要结局指标为30天再入院率和并发症发生率。结果:在研究期间,共有5580例患者接受了大肝切除术。与肉瘤患者(29%)、结肠癌患者(26%)和HCC患者(24%)相比,接受乳腺癌转移肝切除术的患者住院并发症发生率(37%)更高,30天再入院率(37% vs 29% -肉瘤vs 26% -结肠癌vs 25% - HCC)。各组之间的30天死亡率没有差异。结论:因乳腺癌转移和肉瘤而行肝大切除术的患者较同行患者更容易出现不良后果。这种差异突出了在治疗乳腺癌和肝癌转移性肉瘤方面缺乏经验。这也突出了我们研究的所有病变中肿瘤生物学的差异。由于这些结果,在处理乳房和肝脏肉瘤病变时应进行广泛的讨论。
{"title":"Hepatectomy for Breast Cancer Metastasis and Sarcoma are more likely to have Adverse Outcomes than Hepatectomy for Primary Hepatocellular Cancer or for Colorectal Metastasis.","authors":"Hassan Aziz, Kamil Hanna, Muhammad Wasif Saif, Muhammad Ameen Rauf, Yuri Genyk, Mohd Raashid Sheikh","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Outcomes for hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis and sarcomatous disease processes are not well defined in literature. We sought to use a national database to identify outcomes in these patients compared to subset of patients more well studied in literature - primary Hepatocellular cancer patients and patients with colorectal metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients undergoing major hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) for primary hepatocellular cancer (HCC), sarcoma metastasis, breast cancer metastasis, and colorectal metastasis using NSQIP database. The Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5580 patients underwent major hepatectomy during the study period. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis had higher incidence of in-hospital complications (37%) compared to sarcoma (29%), colon (26%), and HCC patients (24%) and 30-days readmission rate (37% <i>vs.</i> 29% - sarcoma <i>vs</i>. 26% - colon <i>vs</i>. 25% HCC). There was no difference in 30-days mortality among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing major hepatectomies for breast cancer metastasis and sarcoma are more likely to have adverse outcomes than compared to their counterparts. This difference highlights the lack of experience in managing breast cancer and sarcoma with metastatic disease to the liver. This also highlights the difference in tumor biology among all the lesions we studied. An extensive discussion should take place when dealing with breast and sarcoma lesions in the liver because of these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"3 Suppl 1","pages":"6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664114/pdf/nihms-1623019.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38607728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mina Ferig, Sylvia Alarcon Velasco, Layla Van Doren, Muhammad Wasif Saif
Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent approximately 0.2% of all gastrointestinal tumors. GISTs can occur anywhere along the length of the gastrointestinal tract. Most common clinical manifestations of GISTs include GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, distention and pain. Small lesions can be found incidentally during imaging studies, endoscopy, surgery and post-mortem. The progression of disease from incidentally found indolent to symptomatic disease is unknown.
Case series: Here we describe a series of cases of incidentally found GIST and their management. The first patient was a 38-years old morbid obese female with an incidentally found GIST in the stomach following an elective laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy. The second patient was a 69-year-old male who underwent elective sleeve gastrectomy for his obesity and associated refractory acid reflux. On pathologic examination of the gastrectomy specimen, GIST was diagnosed in the gastric fundus.
Discussion: Coexistence of GIST with other malignancies is higher than previously reported and should draw attention of clinicians towards these incidental findings. Prognosis in these patients is usually determined by other malignancy and not significantly influenced by GIST. Therefore, treatment algorithms should be focused on prognostically relevant malignancy.
{"title":"Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Incidentalomas: A Case Series.","authors":"Mina Ferig, Sylvia Alarcon Velasco, Layla Van Doren, Muhammad Wasif Saif","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent approximately 0.2% of all gastrointestinal tumors. GISTs can occur anywhere along the length of the gastrointestinal tract. Most common clinical manifestations of GISTs include GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, distention and pain. Small lesions can be found incidentally during imaging studies, endoscopy, surgery and post-mortem. The progression of disease from incidentally found indolent to symptomatic disease is unknown.</p><p><strong>Case series: </strong>Here we describe a series of cases of incidentally found GIST and their management. The first patient was a 38-years old morbid obese female with an incidentally found GIST in the stomach following an elective laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy. The second patient was a 69-year-old male who underwent elective sleeve gastrectomy for his obesity and associated refractory acid reflux. On pathologic examination of the gastrectomy specimen, GIST was diagnosed in the gastric fundus.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Coexistence of GIST with other malignancies is higher than previously reported and should draw attention of clinicians towards these incidental findings. Prognosis in these patients is usually determined by other malignancy and not significantly influenced by GIST. Therefore, treatment algorithms should be focused on prognostically relevant malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"3 Suppl 1","pages":"35-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7664112/pdf/nihms-1641599.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38607729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-07DOI: 10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1005
Mina Ferig, S. A. Alarcon Velasco, Layla Van Doren, M. Saif
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent approximately 0.2% of all gastrointestinal tumors. GISTs can occur anywhere along the length of the gastrointestinal tract. Most common clinical manifestations of GISTs include GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, distention and pain. Small lesions can be found incidentally during imaging studies, endoscopy, surgery and post-mortem. The progression of disease from incidentally found indolent to symptomatic disease is unknown. CASE SERIES Here we describe a series of cases of incidentally found GIST and their management. The first patient was a 38-years old morbid obese female with an incidentally found GIST in the stomach following an elective laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy. The second patient was a 69-year-old male who underwent elective sleeve gastrectomy for his obesity and associated refractory acid reflux. On pathologic examination of the gastrectomy specimen, GIST was diagnosed in the gastric fundus. DISCUSSION Coexistence of GIST with other malignancies is higher than previously reported and should draw attention of clinicians towards these incidental findings. Prognosis in these patients is usually determined by other malignancy and not significantly influenced by GIST. Therefore, treatment algorithms should be focused on prognostically relevant malignancy.
{"title":"Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Incidentalomas: A Case Series.","authors":"Mina Ferig, S. A. Alarcon Velasco, Layla Van Doren, M. Saif","doi":"10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1005","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent approximately 0.2% of all gastrointestinal tumors. GISTs can occur anywhere along the length of the gastrointestinal tract. Most common clinical manifestations of GISTs include GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, distention and pain. Small lesions can be found incidentally during imaging studies, endoscopy, surgery and post-mortem. The progression of disease from incidentally found indolent to symptomatic disease is unknown.\u0000\u0000\u0000CASE SERIES\u0000Here we describe a series of cases of incidentally found GIST and their management. The first patient was a 38-years old morbid obese female with an incidentally found GIST in the stomach following an elective laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy. The second patient was a 69-year-old male who underwent elective sleeve gastrectomy for his obesity and associated refractory acid reflux. On pathologic examination of the gastrectomy specimen, GIST was diagnosed in the gastric fundus.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Coexistence of GIST with other malignancies is higher than previously reported and should draw attention of clinicians towards these incidental findings. Prognosis in these patients is usually determined by other malignancy and not significantly influenced by GIST. Therefore, treatment algorithms should be focused on prognostically relevant malignancy.","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"83 1","pages":"35-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87379246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-23DOI: 10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1002
H. Aziz, K. Hanna, M. Saif, M. A. Rauf, Y. Genyk, M. Sheikh
INTRODUCTION Outcomes for hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis and sarcomatous disease processes are not well defined in literature. We sought to use a national database to identify outcomes in these patients compared to subset of patients more well studied in literature - primary Hepatocellular cancer patients and patients with colorectal metastasis. METHODS We identified patients undergoing major hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) for primary hepatocellular cancer (HCC), sarcoma metastasis, breast cancer metastasis, and colorectal metastasis using NSQIP database. The Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission and complication rates. RESULTS A total of 5580 patients underwent major hepatectomy during the study period. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis had higher incidence of in-hospital complications (37%) compared to sarcoma (29%), colon (26%), and HCC patients (24%) and 30-days readmission rate (37% vs. 29% - sarcoma vs. 26% - colon vs. 25% HCC). There was no difference in 30-days mortality among the groups. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing major hepatectomies for breast cancer metastasis and sarcoma are more likely to have adverse outcomes than compared to their counterparts. This difference highlights the lack of experience in managing breast cancer and sarcoma with metastatic disease to the liver. This also highlights the difference in tumor biology among all the lesions we studied. An extensive discussion should take place when dealing with breast and sarcoma lesions in the liver because of these outcomes.
文献中对乳腺癌转移和肉瘤性疾病过程的肝切除术的结果没有很好的定义。我们试图使用一个国家数据库来确定这些患者的预后,并将其与文献中研究得更充分的患者亚群(原发性肝细胞癌患者和结直肠转移患者)进行比较。方法采用NSQIP数据库,对原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)、肉瘤转移、乳腺癌转移和结直肠癌转移患者进行大肝切除术(≥3节段)的鉴别。主要结局指标为30天死亡率。次要结局指标为30天再入院率和并发症发生率。结果在研究期间,共5580例患者接受了肝切除术。与肉瘤患者(29%)、结肠癌患者(26%)和HCC患者(24%)相比,接受乳腺癌转移肝切除术的患者住院并发症发生率(37%)更高,30天再入院率(37% vs 29% -肉瘤vs 26% -结肠癌vs 25% - HCC)。各组之间的30天死亡率没有差异。结论因乳腺癌转移及肉瘤而行肝大切除术的患者发生不良后果的可能性高于其他患者。这种差异突出了在治疗乳腺癌和肝癌转移性肉瘤方面缺乏经验。这也突出了我们研究的所有病变中肿瘤生物学的差异。由于这些结果,在处理乳房和肝脏肉瘤病变时应进行广泛的讨论。
{"title":"Hepatectomy for Breast Cancer Metastasis and Sarcoma are more likely to have Adverse Outcomes than Hepatectomy for Primary Hepatocellular Cancer or for Colorectal Metastasis.","authors":"H. Aziz, K. Hanna, M. Saif, M. A. Rauf, Y. Genyk, M. Sheikh","doi":"10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46619/CMJ.2020.3.S1-1002","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000Outcomes for hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis and sarcomatous disease processes are not well defined in literature. We sought to use a national database to identify outcomes in these patients compared to subset of patients more well studied in literature - primary Hepatocellular cancer patients and patients with colorectal metastasis.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000We identified patients undergoing major hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) for primary hepatocellular cancer (HCC), sarcoma metastasis, breast cancer metastasis, and colorectal metastasis using NSQIP database. The Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission and complication rates.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 5580 patients underwent major hepatectomy during the study period. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis had higher incidence of in-hospital complications (37%) compared to sarcoma (29%), colon (26%), and HCC patients (24%) and 30-days readmission rate (37% vs. 29% - sarcoma vs. 26% - colon vs. 25% HCC). There was no difference in 30-days mortality among the groups.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Patients undergoing major hepatectomies for breast cancer metastasis and sarcoma are more likely to have adverse outcomes than compared to their counterparts. This difference highlights the lack of experience in managing breast cancer and sarcoma with metastatic disease to the liver. This also highlights the difference in tumor biology among all the lesions we studied. An extensive discussion should take place when dealing with breast and sarcoma lesions in the liver because of these outcomes.","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77293633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-05-12DOI: 10.46619/CMJ.2020.3-1025
M. Saif
The way we communicate and receive information increases in speed and mode each year. Beginning with emails in the 1990s to the use of text messages and then using the Twitter, has revolutionized our communication.
{"title":"Cancer on Twitter.","authors":"M. Saif","doi":"10.46619/CMJ.2020.3-1025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46619/CMJ.2020.3-1025","url":null,"abstract":"The way we communicate and receive information increases in speed and mode each year. Beginning with emails in the 1990s to the use of text messages and then using the Twitter, has revolutionized our communication.","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85482722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}