Cancer medicine journal最新文献

Background: Somatostatin Analogues (SSAs) are used to treat Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and acromegaly. Side effects of SAAs usually include biliary disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, injection-site pain and hyperglycemia. Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) is often misdiagnosed as disease progression or failure to SAAs or diagnosed after a delay in patients receiving SAAs. We present our experience with EPI developing in patients following use of SAAs.

Methods: We reviewed chart and pharmacy records of 110 GEP-NETs patients who received SSAs. Data was collected including demographics, pathology, stage, dose/duration of long and short-acting SA, use of antidiarrheal, pancreatic enzyme replacement (PER), proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or H2 blockers). Laboratory data include chromogranin-A (CgA), urine 5-HIAA and quantitative fecal fat test (QFFT) or fecal elastase test (FE). EPI was defined by a FE below normal level OR by a reduction of ≥ 21.2% or steatorrhea on QFFT. Patients who were identified to develop EPI were treated with pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy (PERT).

Results: Among, 110 GEP-NETs patients, 104 received LA Octreotide and 6 Somatuline Depot Injection. Of these, 23 received short-acting SSA for worsening diarrhea, 96 had intensification of antidiarrheal and 1 got telotristat ethyl. QFFT confirmed EPI in 19, 11 based on clinical symptoms, and 16 had sample error or refusal to collect specimen. CTCAE 4.0 grades of EPI were: grade 2(69%), grade 3(22%) and grade 4(9%). Median time to development of EPI was 12 months (95%CI 3 - 23). Except 1, all patients received PERT either with concomitant PPI (13) or later if no improvement with PERT (6) and 2 on H2 blockers. 37% of the patients had improvement in EPI within 4-8 weeks. Deficiency of vitamins and trace elements was found in 11 of 19 patients, who received supplementation.

Conclusions: Our experience constitutes the first and the largest study addressing EPI as a rare but serious complication of chronic use of SAAs. Although SAAs are used to treat diarrhea, paradoxically they can worsen diarrhea secondary to EPI. Early recognition and diagnosis of this under-diagnosed and under-reported side effect of SAAs, such as EPI, can improve not only diarrhea and weight loss in these patients but also can reduce cost of using short-acting SAAs and antidiarrheal.

Overexpression/amplification of erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) is a major prognostic factor in gastroesophageal cancers; it is currently the only biomarker established for the selection of targeted therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Current standard procedure for determining ERBB2 status in such patients is immunohistochemistry (IHC), followed by in situ hybridization (ISH), when IHC result is equivocal. Insufficient knowledge regarding the utilities of chromosomal microarray (CMA) has hindered its use as an adjunct tool in ERBB2 analysis. Here, we performed CMA on 7 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GEA specimens previously tested by ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and evaluated the concordance and performance of CMA. CMA identified 4 (57.1%) samples with amplification of ERBB2, compared to 3 (42.9%) by FISH. CMA also detected several additional DNA copy number variants in these samples, which may have prognostic and therapeutic indications. Further case studies and clinical trials may provide evidence for the utility of CMA-based genomic studies in the management of patients with suspected ERBB2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

COVID-19 has now been declared a global pandemic with evolving incidence rates and fatalities. It is important to identify vulnerable populations who will be impacted most by this pandemic leading to higher mortality rates compared to the general healthy population. Although older patients and patients with co-morbidities fall into this vulnerable group, patients with hematologic and oncologic malignancies on active cytotoxic treatments are at even greater risk as they are both myelosuppressed and immunosuppressed. In addition to following the universal guidelines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), it is important to also institute guidelines for cancer centers to help protect this vulnerable population. We review the current data, risks, and recommendations for COVID-19 in cancer patients.