Shear wave (SW) elastography is an ultrasound imaging modality that provides quantitative viscoelastic measurements of tissue. The phase difference method allows for local estimation of viscoelasticity by computing the dispersion curve using phases from two laterally-spaced pixels. However, this method is sensitive to measurement noise in the estimated SW particle velocities. Hence, we propose the delayed matrix pencil method to investigate this problem, and validated its feasibility both in-silico and in-vitro. The performance was compared with the original phase difference method and other two alternative techniques based on lowpass filtering and discrete wavelet transform denoising. The estimated viscoelastic values are summarized in box plots and followed by statistical analysis. Results from both studies show the proposed method to be more robust to noise with the smallest interquartile range in both elasticity and viscosity.
One of the primary challenges faced by telehealth systems is the accurate transmission of patient information to remote doctors. In this context, portable medical sensors deployed at the remote patients' end play a crucial role in measuring vital information. There are many sensors available in the market. However, the accuracy of the sensors has been always a concern. The objective of this study is to verify different sensors and create awareness for using accurate sensors to avoid misdiagnosis for the patients’ safety.
This study considered the test result of a Japanese clinical pathology laboratory as the reference gold standard. The clinical pathology laboratory uses 1) Hexokinase UV method for blood glucose, 2) Enzymatic Determination method for cholesterol, 3) Automatic Analyzer (EDTA-2 K) of Hemoglobin, and 4) Uricase POD method for uric acid. To assess the performance of a medical sensor, its test results were compared to the gold standard test results obtained from the laboratory using the same sample. A Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) threshold of less than 0.2 was established as the criterion for determining whether the medical sensor's performance fell within an acceptable range.
Among the eight most commonly used blood glucose devices in the Asian market, only one device was deemed acceptable with NRMSE less than 0.2. However, all four devices found in the Japanese market showed their acceptability. In the case of cholesterol, hemoglobin, and uric acid devices, only a limited number of items were available in Asian markets. Some of the hemoglobin and uric acid devices were found to be somewhat acceptable, while all the cholesterol sensors were found erroneous.
This study has clearly shown the issues with the portable medical sensors and recommends the device approval authority of each country to approve sales of the quality sensors only for patients’ safety.
Several therapeutic combinations are available for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). It is unclear which combinations are most beneficial to the patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Tegafur/ gimeracil/ oteracil (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (S-1OX) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in patients with AGC.
Relevant randomized controlled trials were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), two major Chinese biomedical databases (CBM, CNKI), and registry centers until July 22, 2019, with no language restrictions. Data were extracted for overall response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival time (OST), and toxicity. The systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration. RevMan 5.3.1 was used for statistical analysis.
A total of 6 randomized controlled trials involving 911 patients were included. The quality of the trials was less than 3 points. All the trials demonstrated a significantly improved toxicity (hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy) in the S-1OX trials (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between S-1OX versus CAPOX in terms of ORR, OST, TTP. Any of the subgroup analyses did not exhibit heterogeneity, so the fixed-effects model be used to execute the subgroup meta-analysis.
Both S-1OX and CAPOX showed similar efficacy for treatment of AGC. However, S1-OX appeared to present less toxicity in terms of hand-foot syndrome and neuropathy as compared to CAPOX.

