Pub Date : 2020-01-01Epub Date: 2020-08-28DOI: 10.1007/s40506-020-00229-2
Kushlani Jayatilleke
Purpose of review: Surveillance of communicable diseases is essential in all countries to prevent and control infections, to detect outbreaks and also to see the effects of interventions. The data should be reliable, and collection, analysis and feedback as well as the action based on this data should be fast. In this article, author discusses the limitations the Low Middle income Countries (LMICs) have in implementing disease surveillance and some suggestions for improvement.
Recent findings: Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) has been implemented successfully through most of the countries in Africa though they belong to low or LMIC. Major barriers for surveillance of Healthcare Associated Infections in LMICs are non-availability of adequate number of healthcare personnel such as infection control personnel as well as not having an integrated healthcare system with an effective data flow. For some infections, not having proper diagnostic facilities is a major obstacle. An important capacity limitation in clinical laboratories of LMICs is identification of antimicrobial resistant organisms as well as other pathogens to species level. This affects the surveillance of infections and antimicrobial resistance.
Summary: Use of modern technology, capacity building including the human resources as well as the laboratory capacity in healthcare setting, improving data communication methods, are the main recommendations made. Education and training of healthcare staff as well as educating the general public to change the attitudes of people is another aspect that we need to concentrate.
{"title":"Challenges in Implementing Surveillance Tools of High-Income Countries (HICs) in Low Middle Income Countries (LMICs<b>)</b>.","authors":"Kushlani Jayatilleke","doi":"10.1007/s40506-020-00229-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40506-020-00229-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Surveillance of communicable diseases is essential in all countries to prevent and control infections, to detect outbreaks and also to see the effects of interventions. The data should be reliable, and collection, analysis and feedback as well as the action based on this data should be fast. In this article, author discusses the limitations the Low Middle income Countries (LMICs) have in implementing disease surveillance and some suggestions for improvement.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) has been implemented successfully through most of the countries in Africa though they belong to low or LMIC. Major barriers for surveillance of Healthcare Associated Infections in LMICs are non-availability of adequate number of healthcare personnel such as infection control personnel as well as not having an integrated healthcare system with an effective data flow. For some infections, not having proper diagnostic facilities is a major obstacle. An important capacity limitation in clinical laboratories of LMICs is identification of antimicrobial resistant organisms as well as other pathogens to species level. This affects the surveillance of infections and antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Use of modern technology, capacity building including the human resources as well as the laboratory capacity in healthcare setting, improving data communication methods, are the main recommendations made. Education and training of healthcare staff as well as educating the general public to change the attitudes of people is another aspect that we need to concentrate.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"191-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7453076/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38430231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01Epub Date: 2020-02-24DOI: 10.1007/s40506-020-00211-y
Megan C Gallagher, Sarah Haessler, Hilary M Babcock
Purpose of review: We reviewed the benefit of influenza vaccination in healthcare personnel (HCP), rates of vaccine coverage, and practices used to try to boost vaccine coverage among HCP.
Recent findings: Influenza vaccination in HCP provides benefits to both HCP and patients, including reductions in patient morbidity and mortality and decreases in HCP absenteeism. Despite these benefits, influenza vaccine coverage among HCP still falls short of the Healthy People 2020 goal of 90%. As a result, healthcare institutions have used various practices to boost vaccination, including mandatory vaccine policies and requiring non-immunized HCP to wear masks during the influenza season. All of these efforts have been successful at increasing vaccination rates, and employer vaccination requirements have led to rates that meet the Healthy People 2020 goal. Rates of mandatory vaccine policies have increased over time, and several states now have influenza vaccine requirements. However, additional study into how these policies improve patient outcomes is needed.
Summary: Continued effort is needed to boost influenza vaccination rates among HCP, and mandatory vaccine policies may be used if other methods have not been effective in adequately raising vaccination rates. Future research should focus on how mandatory vaccine policies can improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Influenza Vaccination and Healthcare Personnel Compliance.","authors":"Megan C Gallagher, Sarah Haessler, Hilary M Babcock","doi":"10.1007/s40506-020-00211-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00211-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We reviewed the benefit of influenza vaccination in healthcare personnel (HCP), rates of vaccine coverage, and practices used to try to boost vaccine coverage among HCP.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Influenza vaccination in HCP provides benefits to both HCP and patients, including reductions in patient morbidity and mortality and decreases in HCP absenteeism. Despite these benefits, influenza vaccine coverage among HCP still falls short of the Healthy People 2020 goal of 90%. As a result, healthcare institutions have used various practices to boost vaccination, including mandatory vaccine policies and requiring non-immunized HCP to wear masks during the influenza season. All of these efforts have been successful at increasing vaccination rates, and employer vaccination requirements have led to rates that meet the Healthy People 2020 goal. Rates of mandatory vaccine policies have increased over time, and several states now have influenza vaccine requirements. However, additional study into how these policies improve patient outcomes is needed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Continued effort is needed to boost influenza vaccination rates among HCP, and mandatory vaccine policies may be used if other methods have not been effective in adequately raising vaccination rates. Future research should focus on how mandatory vaccine policies can improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"12 1","pages":"71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40506-020-00211-y","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37959751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: There is a continuing debate regarding contact precaution (CP) usage for endemic multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). In this review, we examine current recommendations for CP and highlight differences in CP use between endemic and non-endemic MDROs.
Recent findings: The discontinuation of CP had no effect on the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci. The evidence regarding CP for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae is inconclusive, highlighting the need for more research to determine best infection control strategies. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae maintains a sporadic pattern in the USA, supporting current recommendations to use CP for colonized and infected patients. MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (MDR-AB) is extremely virulent and responsible for outbreaks in healthcare settings, emphasizing the need for CP use with MDR-AB infected patients. Candida auris (C. auris) is often misdiagnosed; it is resistant to UV light and quaternary ammonium low-level disinfection. Because little is known about the transmission of C. auris, significant caution and CP use are necessitated. There is little research on vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) control strategies due to its rarity; thus, CP is strongly recommended.
Summary: Contact precautions are frequently part of a bundled infection control approach that involves meticulous hand hygiene, patient decolonization, chlorhexidine gluconate bathing, and reducing the use of invasive devices. Healthcare facilities should continue to utilize CP for non-endemic MDROs and the presence of endemic MDROs; however, CP may not add benefit to the current infection prevention bundle approach.
{"title":"Barrier Precautions in the Era of Multidrug Pathogens.","authors":"Rachel Pryor, Carli Viola-Luqa, Olivia Hess, Gonzalo Bearman","doi":"10.1007/s40506-020-00230-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00230-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is a continuing debate regarding contact precaution (CP) usage for endemic multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). In this review, we examine current recommendations for CP and highlight differences in CP use between endemic and non-endemic MDROs.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The discontinuation of CP had no effect on the incidence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococci</i>. The evidence regarding CP for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae is inconclusive, highlighting the need for more research to determine best infection control strategies. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae maintains a sporadic pattern in the USA, supporting current recommendations to use CP for colonized and infected patients. MDR <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (MDR-AB) is extremely virulent and responsible for outbreaks in healthcare settings, emphasizing the need for CP use with MDR-AB infected patients. <i>Candida auris</i> (<i>C. auris</i>) is often misdiagnosed; it is resistant to UV light and quaternary ammonium low-level disinfection. Because little is known about the transmission of <i>C. auris</i>, significant caution and CP use are necessitated. There is little research on vancomycin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (VRSA) control strategies due to its rarity; thus, CP is strongly recommended.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Contact precautions are frequently part of a bundled infection control approach that involves meticulous hand hygiene, patient decolonization, chlorhexidine gluconate bathing, and reducing the use of invasive devices. Healthcare facilities should continue to utilize CP for non-endemic MDROs and the presence of endemic MDROs; however, CP may not add benefit to the current infection prevention bundle approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"321-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40506-020-00230-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38302399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01Epub Date: 2020-07-17DOI: 10.1007/s40506-020-00235-4
P Kar, R Karna
Purpose of review: We aim to provide the readers an up-to-date knowledge of the structure, epidemiology, and transmission followed by a detailed discussion on testing, diagnostics and management of hepatitis E virus infection. We have also included a comprehensive review of hepatitis E in pregnancy.
Recent findings: European Association for the Study of the Liver established clinical practice guidelines for testing and treatment of suspected hepatitis E virus infections in 2018. Evidence suggests chronic hepatitis E may follow a course similar to hepatitis B/C with progression to cirrhosis and possibly hepatocellular carcinoma in immunocompromised patients.
Summary: Hepatitis E virus is the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis worldwide. A combination of serology and nucleic acid amplification testing is the recommended strategy for suspected patients. Ribavirin therapy for a period of 3 months is the drug of choice for severe acute hepatitis, acute-on chronic liver failure, and chronic infections from hepatitis E virus in immunocompromised patients who are unresponsive to decreased immunosuppression. PEGylated interferon α can be used for ribavirin-resistant liver transplant patients with chronic hepatitis E. Further research in therapeutic options is essential considering the stormy course of hepatitis E infection during pregnancy and teratogenicity of all available options.
{"title":"A Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis E.","authors":"P Kar, R Karna","doi":"10.1007/s40506-020-00235-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40506-020-00235-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We aim to provide the readers an up-to-date knowledge of the structure, epidemiology, and transmission followed by a detailed discussion on testing, diagnostics and management of hepatitis E virus infection. We have also included a comprehensive review of hepatitis E in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>European Association for the Study of the Liver established clinical practice guidelines for testing and treatment of suspected hepatitis E virus infections in 2018. Evidence suggests chronic hepatitis E may follow a course similar to hepatitis B/C with progression to cirrhosis and possibly hepatocellular carcinoma in immunocompromised patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Hepatitis E virus is the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis worldwide. A combination of serology and nucleic acid amplification testing is the recommended strategy for suspected patients. Ribavirin therapy for a period of 3 months is the drug of choice for severe acute hepatitis, acute-on chronic liver failure, and chronic infections from hepatitis E virus in immunocompromised patients who are unresponsive to decreased immunosuppression. PEGylated interferon α can be used for ribavirin-resistant liver transplant patients with chronic hepatitis E. Further research in therapeutic options is essential considering the stormy course of hepatitis E infection during pregnancy and teratogenicity of all available options.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"310-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7366488/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38302402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01Epub Date: 2020-08-11DOI: 10.1007/s40506-020-00231-8
Mubeen Khan Mohammed Abdul, Heather S Snyder, Mythili Chunduru, Susan M K Lee, Sanjaya K Satapathy
Purpose of review: Hepatitis C (HCV) is the most common cause of viral hepatitis in elderly individuals. This patient population previously experienced suboptimal outcomes with interferon-based regimens. Unfortunately, patients aged 65 years and older were underrepresented in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials with newer direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapies. Since the advent of second-generation DAA in 2013, numerous robust real-world experiences highlighting the efficacy and safety of DAA in the elderly have been published. This review article summarizes the cascade of care for hepatitis C from diagnosis to cure from an evidence-based perspective of the aging population.
Recent finding: In a large study from the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, the overall sustained virologic response (SVR) of 15,884 patients treated with DAA regimens was 91.2%. These newer therapies remained highly effective in the subset of patients aged 65 years and older with SVR rates above 90%. A Spanish National Registry reported outcomes in patients ≥ 65 years old treated for HCV with oral DAA regimens over a 2-year period. The overall SVR was 94% in the study of 1252 subjects.
Summary: Current real-world data imply DAA treatment regimens remain highly effective and safe in elderly patients when compared to the general population.
{"title":"Hepatitis C Virus in the Elderly in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era: from Diagnosis to Cure.","authors":"Mubeen Khan Mohammed Abdul, Heather S Snyder, Mythili Chunduru, Susan M K Lee, Sanjaya K Satapathy","doi":"10.1007/s40506-020-00231-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00231-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Hepatitis C (HCV) is the most common cause of viral hepatitis in elderly individuals. This patient population previously experienced suboptimal outcomes with interferon-based regimens. Unfortunately, patients aged 65 years and older were underrepresented in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials with newer direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapies. Since the advent of second-generation DAA in 2013, numerous robust real-world experiences highlighting the efficacy and safety of DAA in the elderly have been published. This review article summarizes the cascade of care for hepatitis C from diagnosis to cure from an evidence-based perspective of the aging population.</p><p><strong>Recent finding: </strong>In a large study from the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, the overall sustained virologic response (SVR) of 15,884 patients treated with DAA regimens was 91.2%. These newer therapies remained highly effective in the subset of patients aged 65 years and older with SVR rates above 90%. A Spanish National Registry reported outcomes in patients ≥ 65 years old treated for HCV with oral DAA regimens over a 2-year period. The overall SVR was 94% in the study of 1252 subjects.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current real-world data imply DAA treatment regimens remain highly effective and safe in elderly patients when compared to the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"296-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40506-020-00231-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38302403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01Epub Date: 2020-07-10DOI: 10.1007/s40506-020-00232-7
Amanda Makha Bifani, Eugenia Z Ong, Ruklanthi de Alwis
Purpose of review: At the turn of the nineteenth century, yellow fever (YF) was considered the most dangerous infectious disease with high case fatality. Subsequent, mass vaccination campaigns coupled with widespread elimination of the YF mosquito vector significantly decreased YF cases and reduced outbreaks to the tropical and subtropical forested regions of Africa and South America.
Recent findings: However, recent (2016) large outbreaks in Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and South-Eastern Brazil, where previously had been demarcated as low-risk regions, have highlighted the possibility of a rapidly changing epidemiology and the potential re-emergence of yellow fever virus (YFV). Furthermore, the first-ever importation of YFV into Asia has highlighted the potential fear of YFV emerging as a global threat.
Summary: In this review, we describe the changing epidemiology of YF outbreaks and highlight the use of public health policies, therapeutics, and vaccination as tools to help eliminate future YFV outbreaks.
{"title":"Vaccination and Therapeutics: Responding to the Changing Epidemiology of Yellow Fever.","authors":"Amanda Makha Bifani, Eugenia Z Ong, Ruklanthi de Alwis","doi":"10.1007/s40506-020-00232-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40506-020-00232-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>At the turn of the nineteenth century, yellow fever (YF) was considered the most dangerous infectious disease with high case fatality. Subsequent, mass vaccination campaigns coupled with widespread elimination of the YF mosquito vector significantly decreased YF cases and reduced outbreaks to the tropical and subtropical forested regions of Africa and South America.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>However, recent (2016) large outbreaks in Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and South-Eastern Brazil, where previously had been demarcated as low-risk regions, have highlighted the possibility of a rapidly changing epidemiology and the potential re-emergence of yellow fever virus (YFV). Furthermore, the first-ever importation of YFV into Asia has highlighted the potential fear of YFV emerging as a global threat.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this review, we describe the changing epidemiology of YF outbreaks and highlight the use of public health policies, therapeutics, and vaccination as tools to help eliminate future YFV outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"349-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351566/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38302400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-01-01Epub Date: 2020-11-06DOI: 10.1007/s40506-020-00237-2
Amanda Makha Bifani, Eugenia Z Ong, Ruklanthi de Alwis
At the turn of the nineteenth century, yellow fever (YF) was considered the most dangerous infectious disease with high case fatality. Subsequent, mass vaccination campaigns coupled with widespread elimination of the YF mosquito vector significantly decreased YF cases and reduced outbreaks to the tropical and subtropical forested regions of Africa and South America. However, recent (2016) large outbreaks in Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and South-Eastern Brazil, where previously had been demarcated as low-risk regions, have highlighted the possibility of a rapidly changing epidemiology and the potential re-emergence of yellow fever virus (YFV). Furthermore, the first-ever importation of YFV into Asia has highlighted the potential fear of YFV emerging as a global threat. In this review, we describe the changing epidemiology of YF outbreaks, and highlight the use of public health policies, therapeutics, and vaccination as tools to help eliminate future YFV outbreaks.
{"title":"Vaccination and Therapeutics: Responding to the Changing Epidemiology of Yellow Fever.","authors":"Amanda Makha Bifani, Eugenia Z Ong, Ruklanthi de Alwis","doi":"10.1007/s40506-020-00237-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40506-020-00237-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At the turn of the nineteenth century, yellow fever (YF) was considered the most dangerous infectious disease with high case fatality. Subsequent, mass vaccination campaigns coupled with widespread elimination of the YF mosquito vector significantly decreased YF cases and reduced outbreaks to the tropical and subtropical forested regions of Africa and South America. However, recent (2016) large outbreaks in Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and South-Eastern Brazil, where previously had been demarcated as low-risk regions, have highlighted the possibility of a rapidly changing epidemiology and the potential re-emergence of yellow fever virus (YFV). Furthermore, the first-ever importation of YFV into Asia has highlighted the potential fear of YFV emerging as a global threat. In this review, we describe the changing epidemiology of YF outbreaks, and highlight the use of public health policies, therapeutics, and vaccination as tools to help eliminate future YFV outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"12 4","pages":"398-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7644428/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38595631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-01Epub Date: 2019-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s40506-019-00207-3
Lauren F Collins, Ruth O Adekunle, Emily J Cartwright
Purpose of review: We review the scope and burden of metabolic syndrome in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, risk factors and potential mechanisms driving the increased cardio-metabolic risk in this population, and discuss relevant clinical considerations for management in the era of highly effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) and curative anti-HCV direct-acting antivirals.
Recent findings: HIV/HCV co-infected patients are at elevated risk of metabolic syndrome, attributed to (1) patient-specific factors, (2) viral-mediated effects, and (3) ART exposure. Risk factors for cardio-metabolic disorders are common in this population and include poor socioeconomic conditions, substance use, cardiovascular comorbidities, and liver/kidney disease. Chronic HIV/HCV infection induces an inflammatory and immune activated state in the host leading to alterations in glucose and lipid metabolism. Selection of life-saving ART must carefully consider the differential metabolic risk associated with each drug class and agent, such as dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, weight gain and hypertension. Emerging evidence supports metabolic derangements in chronic HCV may be improved by viral eradication with direct-acting antivirals, however, additional study in HIV/HCV co-infected patients is needed.
Summary: Future research programs should aim to better characterize metabolic syndrome in HIV/HCV co-infected patients with the goal of improved screening, treatment and prevention.
{"title":"Metabolic Syndrome in HIV/HCV Co-infected Patients.","authors":"Lauren F Collins, Ruth O Adekunle, Emily J Cartwright","doi":"10.1007/s40506-019-00207-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-019-00207-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We review the scope and burden of metabolic syndrome in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, risk factors and potential mechanisms driving the increased cardio-metabolic risk in this population, and discuss relevant clinical considerations for management in the era of highly effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) and curative anti-HCV direct-acting antivirals.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>HIV/HCV co-infected patients are at elevated risk of metabolic syndrome, attributed to (1) patient-specific factors, (2) viral-mediated effects, and (3) ART exposure. Risk factors for cardio-metabolic disorders are common in this population and include poor socioeconomic conditions, substance use, cardiovascular comorbidities, and liver/kidney disease. Chronic HIV/HCV infection induces an inflammatory and immune activated state in the host leading to alterations in glucose and lipid metabolism. Selection of life-saving ART must carefully consider the differential metabolic risk associated with each drug class and agent, such as dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, weight gain and hypertension. Emerging evidence supports metabolic derangements in chronic HCV may be improved by viral eradication with direct-acting antivirals, however, additional study in HIV/HCV co-infected patients is needed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Future research programs should aim to better characterize metabolic syndrome in HIV/HCV co-infected patients with the goal of improved screening, treatment and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"11 4","pages":"351-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40506-019-00207-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37619862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-12-01Epub Date: 2019-11-08DOI: 10.1007/s40506-019-00204-6
Tessa Del Carmen, Carrie Johnston, Chelsie Burchett, Eugenia L Siegler
Purpose of review: Antiretroviral therapy has enabled many people with HIV to live long lives with their infection, but the literature suggests that long term survivors are developing comorbidities and aging-related syndromes at earlier ages than their non-infected counterparts. In addition, there is evidence or sex-based differences in comorbidity risk.
Recent findings: How to best care for people aging with HIV is not known, but the tools of comprehensive geriatric assessment can identify people at risk for decline. Newer antiretroviral therapies offer promise of fewer side effects and drug interactions. We will also discuss special needs of women aging with HIV.
Summary: People with HIV and their providers are often unprepared to confront issues of aging, and each clinical program must develop methods to assess older patient and manage age-related complications and syndromes.
{"title":"Special Topics in the Care of Older People with HIV.","authors":"Tessa Del Carmen, Carrie Johnston, Chelsie Burchett, Eugenia L Siegler","doi":"10.1007/s40506-019-00204-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40506-019-00204-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Antiretroviral therapy has enabled many people with HIV to live long lives with their infection, but the literature suggests that long term survivors are developing comorbidities and aging-related syndromes at earlier ages than their non-infected counterparts. In addition, there is evidence or sex-based differences in comorbidity risk.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>How to best care for people aging with HIV is not known, but the tools of comprehensive geriatric assessment can identify people at risk for decline. Newer antiretroviral therapies offer promise of fewer side effects and drug interactions. We will also discuss special needs of women aging with HIV.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>People with HIV and their providers are often unprepared to confront issues of aging, and each clinical program must develop methods to assess older patient and manage age-related complications and syndromes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"11 4","pages":"388-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40506-019-00204-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38393398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-11-26DOI: 10.1007/s40506-019-00208-2
Sarah E. Cotner, K. Dawson
{"title":"New Options in Antifungal Therapy: New Drugs, Inhaled Antifungals, and Management of Resistant Pathogens","authors":"Sarah E. Cotner, K. Dawson","doi":"10.1007/s40506-019-00208-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-019-00208-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72759,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in infectious diseases","volume":"11 1","pages":"418 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40506-019-00208-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48084208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}