Since the advent of endoscopic sphincterotomy, developed in Japan and Germany in 1974, it has become a very common technique used for the treatment of a wide variety of conditions of the biliary system. However, because of the risk of adverse events associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided treatment of bile duct stones, it is important to identify appropriate candidates for this procedure and reserve biliary endoscopy for patients with the highest probability of intraductal stones.
The prevalence of common bile duct (CBD) stones is reported to be 5% to 15% in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic, uncomplicated cholelithiasis.1-3 Liver biochemical tests may be most useful in excluding the presence of CBD stones. The negative predictive value of a normal liver function test in a series of more than 1000 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy was over 97%, whereas the positive predictive value of any abnormal liver biochemical test was only 15%.4 The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis, a guideline statement developed by the Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) in 2010, proposed a strategy to assign the risk of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis based on clinical predictors.5 The very strong predictors (major criteria) include CBD stones found on transabdominal ultrasound (US) study, clinical cholangitis, and total bilirubin level >4 mg/dL. The strong predictors (minor criteria) are dilated CBD on US (>6 mm with gallbladder in situ) or total bilirubin level 1.8 to 4 mg/dL. Patients with one major or two minor predictors are considered high risk and should receive preoperative ERCP. However, if patients have intermediate risk, they should undergo endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) examination before surgery to detect the presence of CBD stones. Two years earlier, ASGE released new guidelines for choledocholithiasis management.6 Emphasis was increased on using laboratory results and bile duct diameter in deciding when to perform ERCP. We noticed that there was no additional new definition of risk predictors in comparison to 2010. However, in the 2019 guidelines, new criterion requiring both bilirubin >4 mg/dL and biliary dilatation was added, which has a specificity approaching 90%. This is similar to the other two high-risk predictors, cholangitis and bile duct stones on imaging, both of which have a specificity exceeding 90%.7 Likewise, computed tomography (CT) is not included in the diagnostic algorithm if CBD stones are diagnosed based on US, liver function test, and clinical information. Most of the invisible CBD stones are small (<5 mm) or less calcified; therefore, they