Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.deman.2023.100145
André J. Scheen
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and liver disease, mainly metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), previously named non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), coexist in many patients. While physicians were reluctant to use glucose-lowering agents other than insulin in patients with T2DM and liver disease for many decades, the scene changed in recent years. While metformin gave controversial results in patients with MAFLD, pioglitazone was the first to demonstrate unequivocal positive effects, but its use in clinical practice is limited by safety concerns. New glucose-lowering agents, both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, raised new hope. Indeed, besides a good safety profile, these agents, which are associated with weight loss, pleitotropic effects and cardiorenal protection, have also proven their efficacy in improving MAFLD. The positive effects on liver fat content, hepatic enzymes used as markers of steatosis and indices of tissue inflammation are now well demonstrated, yet available data on fibrosis are more limited. Thus, more dedicated studies, using liver biopsies, are still warranted to demonstrate the efficacy of these two pharmacological classes in preventing the progression from simple steatosis to fibrosis/cirrhosis and further confirm this new opportunity for the management of patients with T2DM and MAFLD.
{"title":"Comparative effects between old and new antidiabetic agents on metabolic- associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)","authors":"André J. Scheen","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100145","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100145","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and liver disease, mainly metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), previously named non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), coexist in many patients. While physicians were reluctant to use glucose-lowering agents other than insulin in patients with T2DM and liver disease for many decades, the scene changed in recent years. While metformin gave controversial results in patients with MAFLD, pioglitazone was the first to demonstrate unequivocal positive effects, but its use in clinical practice is limited by safety concerns. New glucose-lowering agents, both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, raised new hope. Indeed, besides a good safety profile, these agents, which are associated with weight loss, pleitotropic effects and cardiorenal protection, have also proven their efficacy in improving MAFLD. The positive effects on liver fat content, hepatic enzymes used as markers of steatosis and indices of tissue inflammation are now well demonstrated, yet available data on fibrosis are more limited. Thus, more dedicated studies, using liver biopsies, are still warranted to demonstrate the efficacy of these two pharmacological classes in preventing the progression from simple steatosis to fibrosis/cirrhosis and further confirm this new opportunity for the management of patients with T2DM and MAFLD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46569275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Data on the clinical course of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) from childhood to CF-related diabetes (CFRD) diagnosis in adulthood are limited. We evaluate whether childhood trajectories of parameters of interest in CF are associated with the risk of abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) in early adulthood.
Methods
Pediatric and adult data from 108 subjects with CF followed annually were paired. Participants were grouped according to predominant childhood trajectories for weight, height, body mass index, lung function, glycated hemoglobin levels, fasting glycemia, and 2h post-oral glucose tolerance test glucose levels. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify parameters that predict glucose tolerance status in adulthood.
Results
Univariate analyses reveal that the risk of developing an AGT in adulthood is greater in subjects who are homozygous vs. heterozygous for the ΔF508 mutation, have pancreatic insufficiency vs. sufficiency, or have higher fasting glycemia values at 10 years old rising rapidly vs. lower values that are gradually rising until 17 years old. Multivariable logistic regression retains only fasting glycemia as a significant predictor for the occurrence of AGT in adulthood.
Conclusions
Fasting glycemia may be a clinical marker of interest to better target children with CF at risk of developing an AGT in early adulthood.
{"title":"Latent class analysis to identify childhood predictors of abnormal glycemic status in young adults with cystic fibrosis","authors":"Florence Racine , Miguel Chagnon , Valérie Boudreau , Katherine Desjardins , Cécile Q.T. Nguyen , Marie-Hélène Denis , Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret , Geneviève Mailhot","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100141","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100141","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>AIMS</h3><p>Data on the clinical course of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) from childhood to CF-related diabetes (CFRD) diagnosis in adulthood are limited. We evaluate whether childhood trajectories of parameters of interest in CF are associated with the risk of abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) in early adulthood.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pediatric and adult data from 108 subjects with CF followed annually were paired. Participants were grouped according to predominant childhood trajectories for weight, height, body mass index, lung function, glycated hemoglobin levels, fasting glycemia, and 2h post-oral glucose tolerance test glucose levels. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify parameters that predict glucose tolerance status in adulthood.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Univariate analyses reveal that the risk of developing an AGT in adulthood is greater in subjects who are homozygous vs. heterozygous for the ΔF508 mutation, have pancreatic insufficiency vs. sufficiency, or have higher fasting glycemia values at 10 years old rising rapidly vs. lower values that are gradually rising until 17 years old. Multivariable logistic regression retains only fasting glycemia as a significant predictor for the occurrence of AGT in adulthood.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Fasting glycemia may be a clinical marker of interest to better target children with CF at risk of developing an AGT in early adulthood.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44318852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.deman.2023.100139
Charles Antwi-Boasiako , Kwaku Amponsah Obeng , Kwesi Nyan Amissah-Arthur , Latif Musah , Benjamin Abaidoo , Henry Wedoi Awuviri , Joseph Agyapong Abbey , Pelagia Awula , Ruth Korkor Tei , Charles Agyemang , Albert.G.B. Amoah , Charles F. Hayfron-Benjamin
Background
Studies assessing the concordance of albuminuria and retinal microvascular dysfunction (RMD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have yielded inconsistent results. Similar to ethnicity, hypertension may be a potential explanatory variable. We compared the association between albuminuria and RMD in West Africans with T2D with and without hypertension.
Materials and methods
This was a cross-sectional study among 177 systematically sampled Ghanaians with T2D aged ≥ 35 years. Albuminuria was based on urinary albumin-creatinine ratio≥30 mg/g. Retinal images were analyzed and graded according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations of albuminuria and RMD with adjustments for age, sex, socioeconomic status, diabetes duration, HbA1c, smoking, systolic blood pressure (BP), BMI, and total cholesterol.
Results
RMD was more prevalent in individuals with albuminuria than in those without albuminuria (41.7% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.026). In the fully adjusted model, albuminuria remained significantly associated with RMD (odds ratio 2.41[95% CI:1.00–5.80], p = 0.049); the association between albuminuria and RMD was more pronounced in individuals with hypertension (3.10 [1.01–9.50], 0.048) than without hypertension (1.70[0.33–8.77],0.523). In analyses stratified by BP control, albuminuria was significantly associated with RMD in individuals with suboptimal BP (2.76[1.07–7.14], 0.037) but not in individuals with optimal BP (0.24[0.00–17.04],0.512)
Conclusion
Our study shows positive associations between albuminuria and RMD among West Africans with T2D, with the strength of association, accentuated in individuals with hypertension/suboptimal BP. Future studies could further characterize the role of hypertension in the associations between albuminuria and RMD.
背景:评估2型糖尿病(T2D)患者蛋白尿和视网膜微血管功能障碍(RMD)一致性的研究得出了不一致的结果。与种族相似,高血压可能是一个潜在的解释变量。我们比较了伴有和不伴有高血压的西非t2dm患者蛋白尿和RMD之间的关系。材料和方法这是一项横断面研究,系统抽样177名年龄≥35岁的T2D加纳患者。蛋白尿以尿白蛋白-肌酐比值≥30mg /g为基础。根据早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究标准对视网膜图像进行分析和分级。使用Logistic回归来检查蛋白尿和RMD与年龄、性别、社会经济地位、糖尿病病程、HbA1c、吸烟、收缩压(BP)、BMI和总胆固醇的关系。结果有蛋白尿者的rmd患病率高于无蛋白尿者(41.7%比24.0%,p = 0.026)。在完全调整后的模型中,蛋白尿与RMD仍然显著相关(优势比2.41[95% CI: 1.00-5.80], p = 0.049);蛋白尿与RMD的相关性在高血压患者(3.10[1.01-9.50],0.048)比非高血压患者(1.70[0.33-8.77],0.523)更为显著。在按血压控制分层的分析中,蛋白尿在血压次优的个体中与RMD显著相关(2.76[1.07-7.14],0.037),而在血压最佳的个体中与RMD无关(0.24[0.00-17.04],0.512)。结论我们的研究显示,西非T2D患者中蛋白尿与RMD呈正相关,且这种相关性在高血压/血压次优的个体中更为明显。未来的研究可以进一步确定高血压在蛋白尿和RMD之间的关系中的作用。
{"title":"Association between albuminuria and retinal microvascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes with and without hypertension","authors":"Charles Antwi-Boasiako , Kwaku Amponsah Obeng , Kwesi Nyan Amissah-Arthur , Latif Musah , Benjamin Abaidoo , Henry Wedoi Awuviri , Joseph Agyapong Abbey , Pelagia Awula , Ruth Korkor Tei , Charles Agyemang , Albert.G.B. Amoah , Charles F. Hayfron-Benjamin","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100139","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100139","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies assessing the concordance of albuminuria and retinal microvascular dysfunction (RMD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have yielded inconsistent results. Similar to ethnicity, hypertension may be a potential explanatory variable. We compared the association between albuminuria and RMD in West Africans with T2D with and without hypertension.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This was a cross-sectional study among 177 systematically sampled Ghanaians with T2D aged ≥ 35 years. Albuminuria was based on urinary albumin-creatinine ratio≥30 mg/g. Retinal images were analyzed and graded according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations of albuminuria and RMD with adjustments for age, sex, socioeconomic status, diabetes duration, HbA1c, smoking, systolic blood pressure (BP), BMI, and total cholesterol.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>RMD was more prevalent in individuals with albuminuria than in those without albuminuria (41.7% vs. 24.0%, <em>p</em> = 0.026). In the fully adjusted model, albuminuria remained significantly associated with RMD (odds ratio 2.41[95% CI:1.00–5.80], <em>p</em> = 0.049); the association between albuminuria and RMD was more pronounced in individuals with hypertension (3.10 [1.01–9.50], 0.048) than without hypertension (1.70[0.33–8.77],0.523). In analyses stratified by BP control, albuminuria was significantly associated with RMD in individuals with suboptimal BP (2.76[1.07–7.14], 0.037) but not in individuals with optimal BP (0.24[0.00–17.04],0.512)</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study shows positive associations between albuminuria and RMD among West Africans with T2D, with the strength of association, accentuated in individuals with hypertension/suboptimal BP. Future studies could further characterize the role of hypertension in the associations between albuminuria and RMD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46804618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a microangiopathy caused by Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), is associated with significant visual disability leading to suboptimal quality of life. Retinal microvasculature changes can reflect similar changes in the grey matter and blood-brain barrier. Microvascular changes in the brain are associated with cognitive dysfunction. The present study aimed to find the association between Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) and Cognitive Impairment (CI) and its relationship with Quality of Life (QoL).
Methodology
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital among patients (aged 18 years and above) with pre-existing T2DM as per Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 criteria. Patients with visual acuity less than 3/60, or education below 6th grade, or with comorbid mental or neurocognitive disorders illness were excluded from the study. DR grading was done using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) criteria. Cognitive functions and quality of life were measured using Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) and World Health Organization – Quality of Life scale – brief version (WHO-QOL BREF). The primary outcome measures (cognitive impairment and quality of life) were compared between patients with DR (DR+) and patients without DR (DR-). A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed in 48.5% (83 out of 171) of the sample. The DR+ group were predominantly male, significantly older, had comorbid immature cataract and hypertension than the DR- group. Also, the DR+ group had significantly reduced scores in all domains of MoCA and QoL. among patients with DR, those with severe and moderate NPDR had more cognitive impairment than mild NPDR. Age and duration of diabetes did not correlate with MoCA and QoL scores.
Conclusion
The presence of diabetic retinopathy is associated with cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life in this study population. The association is independent of the age of patient and the duration of diabetes mellitus.
{"title":"The association between diabetic retinopathy, cognitive impairment, and quality of life – a cross sectional study","authors":"Parvathy Geetha Sajeev , Srikanth Krishnagopal , Karthick Subramanian","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a microangiopathy caused by Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), is associated with significant visual disability leading to suboptimal quality of life. Retinal microvasculature changes can reflect similar changes in the grey matter and blood-brain barrier. Microvascular changes in the brain are associated with cognitive dysfunction. The present study aimed to find the association between Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) and Cognitive Impairment (CI) and its relationship with Quality of Life (QoL).</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital among patients (aged 18 years and above) with pre-existing T2DM as per Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 criteria. Patients with visual acuity less than 3/60, or education below 6th grade, or with comorbid mental or neurocognitive disorders illness were excluded from the study. DR grading was done using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) criteria. Cognitive functions and quality of life were measured using Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) and World Health Organization – Quality of Life scale – brief version (WHO-QOL BREF). The primary outcome measures (cognitive impairment and quality of life) were compared between patients with DR (DR+) and patients without DR (DR-). A <em>P</em> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed in 48.5% (83 out of 171) of the sample. The DR+ group were predominantly male, significantly older, had comorbid immature cataract and hypertension than the DR- group. Also, the DR+ group had significantly reduced scores in all domains of MoCA and QoL. among patients with DR, those with severe and moderate NPDR had more cognitive impairment than mild NPDR. Age and duration of diabetes did not correlate with MoCA and QoL scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of diabetic retinopathy is associated with cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life in this study population. The association is independent of the age of patient and the duration of diabetes mellitus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43983039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.deman.2023.100151
Pandora L. Wander , Elliott Lowy , Anna Korpak , Lauren A. Beste , Steven E. Kahn , Edward J. Boyko
Aims
To examine associations of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 with insulin treatment in new-onset diabetes.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Veterans Health Administration data (March 1, 2020–June 1, 2022). Individuals with ≥1 positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 6,706) comprised the exposed group, and individuals with no positive swab and ≥1 laboratory test of any type (n = 20,518) the unexposed group. For exposed, the index date was the date of first positive swab, and for unexposed a random date during the month of the qualifying laboratory test. Among Veterans with new-onset diabetes after the index date, we modeled associations of SARS-CoV-2 with most recent A1c prior to insulin treatment or end of follow-up and receipt of >1 outpatient insulin prescription starting within 120 days.
Results
SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a 40% higher odds of insulin treatment compared to no positive test (95%CI 1.2–1.8) but not with most recent A1c (ß 0.00, 95%CI -0.04–0.04). Among Veterans with SARS-CoV-2, ≥2 vaccine doses prior to the index date was marginally associated with lower odds of insulin treatment (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.3–1.0).
Conclusions
SARS-CoV-2 is associated with higher odds of insulin treatment but not with higher A1c. Vaccination may be protective.
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with higher odds of insulin treatment but not with hemoglobin A1c at 120 days in U.S. Veterans with new-onset diabetes","authors":"Pandora L. Wander , Elliott Lowy , Anna Korpak , Lauren A. Beste , Steven E. Kahn , Edward J. Boyko","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100151","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100151","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine associations of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 with insulin treatment in new-onset diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Veterans Health Administration data (March 1, 2020–June 1, 2022). Individuals with ≥1 positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 (<em>n</em> = 6,706) comprised the exposed group, and individuals with no positive swab and ≥1 laboratory test of any type (<em>n</em> = 20,518) the unexposed group. For exposed, the index date was the date of first positive swab, and for unexposed a random date during the month of the qualifying laboratory test. Among Veterans with new-onset diabetes after the index date, we modeled associations of SARS-CoV-2 with most recent A1c prior to insulin treatment or end of follow-up and receipt of >1 outpatient insulin prescription starting within 120 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a 40% higher odds of insulin treatment compared to no positive test (95%CI 1.2–1.8) but not with most recent A1c (ß 0.00, 95%CI -0.04–0.04). Among Veterans with SARS-CoV-2, ≥2 vaccine doses prior to the index date was marginally associated with lower odds of insulin treatment (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.3–1.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SARS-CoV-2 is associated with higher odds of insulin treatment but not with higher A1c. Vaccination may be protective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10263386/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9666788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.deman.2023.100138
Shweta Sharma , Elliot Duong , Helen Davies , Nicholas Tutticci , Terrance Tan
Objective
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are associated with risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis. Guidelines recommend withholding SGLT2i prior to surgery and considering procedure delay in the presence of ketosis. Literature to support this in setting of routine outpatient colonoscopy is limited. Our aim was to clarify the incidence and range of ketosis in all individuals presenting for elective colonoscopies to help setting guidelines and threshold for concern.
Methods
This single-centre prospective study recruited patients ≥18 of age who underwent routine outpatient colonoscopies in a medium metropolitan hospital in Brisbane, Australia between August and November 2021. SGLT2i were withheld for 48 h prior and blood glucose and capillary ketone concentrations were recorded within 90 minutes before procedure commencement.
Results
315 individuals were consecutively recruited; 179 (56.8%) were female. Sixty-nine (21.9%) had a previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 17 (5.4%) were taking SGLT2i. The mean age was 57.79 (± 15.21). Significant ketone levels defined as >1.0 mmol/L were noted in 41 individuals (13.0%). Of these, 13 (33%) were diabetic with ketosis ranging from 1.0-4.2mmol/L. The range of significant ketosis in the 28 non-diabetics was 1.0-5.7mmol/L. Only a diagnosis of T2DM and increased fasting times (>45 mins) conferred a greater trend towards ketosis risk. Patients with T2DM as a whole were 2.06 times more likely to develop ketosis with or without SGLT2i. This did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.05).
Conclusion
A wide range of periprocedural ketosis commonly occurs in patients undergoing colonoscopies with or without T2DM. This phenomenon is not unique to diabetics or in those on SGLT2i. Hence, previously defined significant ketosis cut-offs are unlikely to be useful in the unique context of colonoscopies. Avoiding procedural delays and early commencement oral intake should be a priority.
{"title":"Ketosis in patients undergoing colonoscopy – more common than we think","authors":"Shweta Sharma , Elliot Duong , Helen Davies , Nicholas Tutticci , Terrance Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100138","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100138","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are associated with risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis. Guidelines recommend withholding SGLT2i prior to surgery and considering procedure delay in the presence of ketosis. Literature to support this in setting of routine outpatient colonoscopy is limited. Our aim was to clarify the incidence and range of ketosis in all individuals presenting for elective colonoscopies to help setting guidelines and threshold for concern.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-centre prospective study recruited patients ≥18 of age who underwent routine outpatient colonoscopies in a medium metropolitan hospital in Brisbane, Australia between August and November 2021. SGLT2i were withheld for 48 h prior and blood glucose and capillary ketone concentrations were recorded within 90 minutes before procedure commencement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>315 individuals were consecutively recruited; 179 (56.8%) were female. Sixty-nine (21.9%) had a previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 17 (5.4%) were taking SGLT2i. The mean age was 57.79 (± 15.21). Significant ketone levels defined as >1.0 mmol/L were noted in 41 individuals (13.0%). Of these, 13 (33%) were diabetic with ketosis ranging from 1.0-4.2mmol/L. The range of significant ketosis in the 28 non-diabetics was 1.0-5.7mmol/L. Only a diagnosis of T2DM and increased fasting times (>45 mins) conferred a greater trend towards ketosis risk. Patients with T2DM as a whole were 2.06 times more likely to develop ketosis with or without SGLT2i. This did not reach statistical significance (<em>p</em> = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A wide range of periprocedural ketosis commonly occurs in patients undergoing colonoscopies with or without T2DM. This phenomenon is not unique to diabetics or in those on SGLT2i. Hence, previously defined significant ketosis cut-offs are unlikely to be useful in the unique context of colonoscopies. Avoiding procedural delays and early commencement oral intake should be a priority.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46844474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To assess the prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes in France between 2013 and 2014 using data from the CONSTANCES cohort, and to identify factors associated with prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes.
Methods
The study population comprised participants recruited in 2013–2014 in CONSTANCES, an ongoing French national prospective cohort following participants aged 18–69 years who are covered by France's general health insurance scheme. Participants completed a questionnaire at baseline and underwent a medical examination which included providing blood samples. Undiagnosed diabetes was defined as a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7 mmol/l and diagnosed diabetes as self-report or identification of reimbursements for anti-diabetics. Prediabetes was defined as a FPG ≥ 6 mmol/l but < 7 mmol/l.
Results
25,137 participants were included in the analyses. The overall prevalence of prediabetes was 7.2% [95% confidence interval: 6.7–7.7], 1.6% [1.4–1.9] for undiagnosed diabetes, and 4.0% [3.6–4.4] for diagnosed diabetes. These rates were significantly higher in men, in older persons, in persons with obesity, and in those with lower education levels. In multivariate regression models, excessive corpulence was the variable most strongly associated with undiagnosed diabetes (adjusted Odds Ratio=9.31) and prediabetes (aOR=3.85). Additionally, male sex, older age, family history of diabetes, at-risk alcohol use, and lower education level were all positively associated with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes.
Conclusion
Diabetes and prediabetes prevention together with screening for undiagnosed diabetes must be strengthened for persons with low socioeconomic status and for those with obesity or overweight.
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors associated with prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in France: The national CONSTANCES cohort","authors":"Grégory Lailler , Sonsoles Fuentes , Sofiane Kab , Clara Piffaretti , Marie Guion , Sébastien Czernichow , Emmanuel Cosson , Sandrine Fosse-Edorh","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100121","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100121","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To assess the prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes in France between 2013 and 2014 using data from the CONSTANCES cohort, and to identify factors associated with prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study population comprised participants recruited in 2013–2014 in CONSTANCES, an ongoing French national prospective cohort following participants aged 18–69 years who are covered by France's general health insurance scheme. Participants completed a questionnaire at baseline and underwent a medical examination which included providing blood samples. Undiagnosed diabetes was defined as a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7 mmol/l and diagnosed diabetes as self-report or identification of reimbursements for anti-diabetics. Prediabetes was defined as a FPG ≥ 6 mmol/l but < 7 mmol/l.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>25,137 participants were included in the analyses. The overall prevalence of prediabetes was 7.2% [95% confidence interval: 6.7–7.7], 1.6% [1.4–1.9] for undiagnosed diabetes, and 4.0% [3.6–4.4] for diagnosed diabetes. These rates were significantly higher in men, in older persons, in persons with obesity, and in those with lower education levels. In multivariate regression models, excessive corpulence was the variable most strongly associated with undiagnosed diabetes (adjusted Odds Ratio=9.31) and prediabetes (aOR=3.85). Additionally, male sex, older age, family history of diabetes, at-risk alcohol use, and lower education level were all positively associated with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Diabetes and prediabetes prevention together with screening for undiagnosed diabetes must be strengthened for persons with low socioeconomic status and for those with obesity or overweight.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45989237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1016/j.deman.2022.100122
Jennifer Ko , Eva Y. Wong , Huyentran N. Tran , Rebecca J.C. Tran , Diana X. Cao
Introduction
L-carnitine possibly impacts insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism. However, its therapeutic role in diabetes is poorly understood.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception through June 30, 2021. Included studies evaluated the use of L-carnitine in diabetes on fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), weight, or body mass index (BMI). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.
Results
Seventeen studies involving 1622 patients were included. Reductions in FBG (WMD = -0.46 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.68 to -0.23 mmol/L), HbA1c (WMD = -0.5%, 95% CI = -0.8 to -0.1%), TC (WMD = -0.29 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.42 to -0.16 mmol/L), and LDL-C (WMD = -0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.39 to -0.07 mmol/L) were significant. Effects on HDL-C, TG, weight, or BMI were insignificant. Doses between 1001 to 2000 mg showed greatest benefit (p < 0.02 for all).
Discussion/Conclusion
L-carnitine plays a potential role as adjunctive therapy in diabetes. Additional research is necessary for patients with higher baseline HbA1c and type 1 diabetes.
左旋肉碱可能影响胰岛素敏感性和葡萄糖代谢。然而,其在糖尿病中的治疗作用尚不清楚。方法从研究开始到2021年6月30日,使用PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(Central)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入的研究评估了在糖尿病患者中使用左旋肉碱对空腹血糖(FBG)、血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、甘油三酯(TG)、体重或体重指数(BMI)的影响。加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)采用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型计算。结果纳入17项研究,共1622例患者。减少光纤光栅(大规模杀伤性武器= -0.46更易与L, 95% CI = -0.68到-0.23更易/ L),糖化血红蛋白(大规模杀伤性武器= -0.5%,95% CI = -0.8到-0.1%),TC(大规模杀伤性武器= -0.29更易与L, 95% CI = -0.42到-0.16更易/ L),和低密度(大规模杀伤性武器= -0.23更易与L, 95% CI = -0.39到-0.07更易/ L)是重要的。对HDL-C、TG、体重或BMI的影响不显著。剂量在1001至2000毫克之间显示出最大的益处(p <所有人都是0.02)。讨论/结论左旋肉碱在糖尿病的辅助治疗中具有潜在的作用。对于基线HbA1c较高和1型糖尿病患者,有必要进行进一步的研究。
{"title":"The glycemic, cholesterol, and weight effects of L-carnitine in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Jennifer Ko , Eva Y. Wong , Huyentran N. Tran , Rebecca J.C. Tran , Diana X. Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100122","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100122","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>L-carnitine possibly impacts insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism. However, its therapeutic role in diabetes is poorly understood.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception through June 30, 2021. Included studies evaluated the use of L-carnitine in diabetes on fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), weight, or body mass index (BMI). Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen studies involving 1622 patients were included. Reductions in FBG (WMD = -0.46 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.68 to -0.23 mmol/L), HbA1c (WMD = -0.5%, 95% CI = -0.8 to -0.1%), TC (WMD = -0.29 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.42 to -0.16 mmol/L), and LDL-C (WMD = -0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.39 to -0.07 mmol/L) were significant. Effects on HDL-C, TG, weight, or BMI were insignificant. Doses between 1001 to 2000 mg showed greatest benefit (<em>p</em> < 0.02 for all).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/Conclusion</h3><p>L-carnitine plays a potential role as adjunctive therapy in diabetes. Additional research is necessary for patients with higher baseline HbA1c and type 1 diabetes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41558345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-01DOI: 10.1016/j.deman.2022.100124
Roosa Perämäki , Mika Gissler , Meri-Maija Ollila , Janne Hukkanen , Marja Vääräsmäki , Jukka Uotila , Saara Metso , Heidi Hakkarainen , Reeta Rintamäki , Risto Kaaja , Heidi Immonen
Aims
Women with a history of gestational diabetes (GDM) have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We studied the risk for T2DM in women with and without GDM in relation to body mass index (BMI) and examined whether insulin treatment for GDM associates with the risk of developing T2DM. In addition, we investigated whether the risk of developing T2DM after GDM had changed in 15 years.
Methods
We used data by linking four registers; Medical Birth Register, Hospital Discharge Register and Primary Care Register run by THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, and Medical Reimbursement Statistics run by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela). Registry data were collected from 2005 to 2020. The follow-up started from woman's delivery in 2006-2020 and ended to the diagnosis of T2DM or December 2020. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to estimate the effect of GDM exposure to T2DM. To assess whether the risk of developing T2DM after GDM had changed in 15 years, we compared the HR between years 2006-2008 and 2018-2020.
Results
In total, 462 401 women were included in the study: 96 353 (21%) women had previous GDM. There were 5370 (1.2%) women who developed T2DM after childbirth during the follow-up. Among women with prior GDM, 3995 (4.1%) developed T2DM, while 1375 (0.4%) women without prior GDM developed T2DM during follow-up. The mean follow-up was 6.86 years (SD 4.21) for women with GDM and 9.07 years (SD 4.35) for women without GDM. The hazard ratio (HR) for developing T2DM after GDM was 18.49 (95% CI 17.39-19.67). The incidence of T2DM in women with a history of GDM began to rise almost steadily from the first year of follow-up. As BMI increased, T2DM incidence increased in both women with and without prior GDM but more in women with prior GDM. Insulin treatment had an independent association with increased risk of T2DM (HR 3.81, 95% CI 3.57-4.07). We did not observe any difference in HR between years 2006-2008 and 2018-2020.
Conclusions
The relative risk for T2DM was 11-fold for women with previous GDM compared to women without previous GDM. A higher BMI and insulin treatment increased the risk of future diabetes. All measures to prevent the conversion of GDM to T2DM should be taken especially among women with overweight or obesity.
目的有妊娠糖尿病(GDM)病史的女性患2型糖尿病(T2DM)的风险增加。我们研究了患有和不患有GDM的女性患T2DM的风险与体重指数(BMI)的关系,并检查了GDM的胰岛素治疗是否与患T2DM的风险相关。此外,我们调查了GDM后发生T2DM的风险在15年内是否发生了变化。方法采用四个寄存器连接数据;由芬兰卫生和福利研究所管理的医疗出生登记册、出院登记册和初级保健登记册,以及由芬兰社会保险机构管理的医疗报销统计。登记处的数据收集于2005年至2020年。随访从2006-2020年妇女分娩开始,至诊断为T2DM或2020年12月结束。Cox比例风险模型用于估计GDM暴露对T2DM的影响。为了评估GDM后发生T2DM的风险在15年内是否发生变化,我们比较了2006-2008年和2018-2020年的HR。结果共纳入462 401例女性,其中96 353例(21%)有既往GDM。在随访期间,5370名(1.2%)妇女在分娩后发展为2型糖尿病。在既往有GDM的女性中,3995名(4.1%)发展为T2DM,而1375名(0.4%)无GDM的女性在随访期间发展为T2DM。GDM女性的平均随访时间为6.86年(SD 4.21),非GDM女性的平均随访时间为9.07年(SD 4.35)。GDM后发生T2DM的风险比(HR)为18.49 (95% CI 17.39-19.67)。在有GDM病史的女性中,T2DM的发病率从随访的第一年开始几乎稳步上升。随着BMI的增加,T2DM的发病率在有或没有GDM病史的女性中都增加,但在有GDM病史的女性中增加。胰岛素治疗与T2DM风险增加有独立关联(HR 3.81, 95% CI 3.57-4.07)。我们没有观察到2006-2008年和2018-2020年之间的人力资源差异。结论既往有GDM的女性发生T2DM的相对风险是无GDM女性的11倍。较高的身体质量指数和胰岛素治疗增加了未来患糖尿病的风险。应采取一切措施防止GDM转化为T2DM,特别是超重或肥胖的妇女。
{"title":"The risk of developing type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: A registry study from Finland","authors":"Roosa Perämäki , Mika Gissler , Meri-Maija Ollila , Janne Hukkanen , Marja Vääräsmäki , Jukka Uotila , Saara Metso , Heidi Hakkarainen , Reeta Rintamäki , Risto Kaaja , Heidi Immonen","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100124","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100124","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Women with a history of gestational diabetes (GDM) have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We studied the risk for T2DM in women with and without GDM in relation to body mass index (BMI) and examined whether insulin treatment for GDM associates with the risk of developing T2DM. In addition, we investigated whether the risk of developing T2DM after GDM had changed in 15 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used data by linking four registers; Medical Birth Register, Hospital Discharge Register and Primary Care Register run by THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, and Medical Reimbursement Statistics run by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela). Registry data were collected from 2005 to 2020. The follow-up started from woman's delivery in 2006-2020 and ended to the diagnosis of T2DM or December 2020. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to estimate the effect of GDM exposure to T2DM. To assess whether the risk of developing T2DM after GDM had changed in 15 years, we compared the HR between years 2006-2008 and 2018-2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 462 401 women were included in the study: 96 353 (21%) women had previous GDM. There were 5370 (1.2%) women who developed T2DM after childbirth during the follow-up. Among women with prior GDM, 3995 (4.1%) developed T2DM, while 1375 (0.4%) women without prior GDM developed T2DM during follow-up. The mean follow-up was 6.86 years (SD 4.21) for women with GDM and 9.07 years (SD 4.35) for women without GDM. The hazard ratio (HR) for developing T2DM after GDM was 18.49 (95% CI 17.39-19.67). The incidence of T2DM in women with a history of GDM began to rise almost steadily from the first year of follow-up. As BMI increased, T2DM incidence increased in both women with and without prior GDM but more in women with prior GDM. Insulin treatment had an independent association with increased risk of T2DM (HR 3.81, 95% CI 3.57-4.07). We did not observe any difference in HR between years 2006-2008 and 2018-2020.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The relative risk for T2DM was 11-fold for women with previous GDM compared to women without previous GDM. A higher BMI and insulin treatment increased the risk of future diabetes. All measures to prevent the conversion of GDM to T2DM should be taken especially among women with overweight or obesity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49310821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}