Discover health systems最新文献

Introduction: Viral suppression during pregnancy and postpartum sustains the health of mothers living with HIV and reduces risk of transmitting HIV to newborns. Point of care viral load (POC VL) testing improves viral suppression and retention in care, and is increasingly being integrated into routine health services for African pregnant women living with HIV. We examined processes of implementing POC VL testing in antenatal care and at delivery for Ugandan mothers living with HIV as part of a pilot randomized trial (Clinical Trial Number: NCT05092997).

Methods: We conducted individual qualitative interviews with 12 (of 16) clinical and research staff who implemented POC VL testing ("implementers"), and 22 (of 151) mothers who received POC VL testing using the Xpert^® HIV-1 Viral Load Assay (Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) as part of the trial. Implementer interviews covered knowledge, perceptions and experiences of implementing POC VL testing. Mothers' interviews covered attitudes, perceptions and experiences of receiving POC VL testing. Interview data were collected from December 2021 to September 2022. An inductive, content analytic approach was used to examine the interview transcripts. The goal was to develop thematic content categories addressing the question: How did a group of Ugandan health care providers ("implementers") approach the process of implementing POC VL testing in antenatal care and at delivery for mothers living with HIV?

Results: The inductive analysis of implementers' and mothers' qualitative accounts yielded three themes that speak to how health care staff approached implementation of POC VL testing in the pilot randomized trial. They created an efficient system of communication and then relied on that system to coordinate POC VL testing procedures. They also looked for and found ways of increasing the speed and efficiency of the testing process. Finally, they adopted a "mother-centered" approach to implementation, prioritizing the needs, preferences, and well-being of women in planning and carrying out testing procedures.

Conclusion: As POC VL testing becomes more widely used across high HIV burden settings, understanding how implementers think about and approach the implementation process and what they do to make an intervention successful will be an important part of evaluating feasibility.

Despite making remarkable strides in improving health outcomes, Malawi faces concerns about sustaining the progress achieved due to limited fiscal space and donor dependency. The imperative for efficient health spending becomes evident, necessitating strategic allocation of resources to areas with the greatest impact on mortality and morbidity. Health benefits packages hold promise in supporting efficient resource allocation. However, despite defining these packages over the last two decades, their development and implementation have posed significant challenges for Malawi. In response, the Malawian government, in collaboration with the Thanzi la Onse Programme, has developed a set of tools and frameworks, primarily based on cost-effectiveness analysis, to guide the design of health benefits packages likely to achieve national health objectives. This review provides an overview of these tools and frameworks, accompanied by other related analyses, aiming to better align health financing with health benefits package prioritization. The paper is organized around five key policy questions facing decision-makers: (i) What interventions should the health system deliver? (ii) How should resources be allocated geographically? (iii) How should investments in health system inputs be prioritized? (iv) How should equity considerations be incorporated into resource allocation decisions? and (v) How should evidence generation be prioritized to support resource allocation decisions (guiding research)? The tools and frameworks presented here are intended to be compatible for use in diverse and often complex healthcare systems across Africa, supporting the health resource allocation process as countries pursue Universal Health Coverage.

Issued in January 2020, the federal Public Health Emergency (PHE)'s termination was ultimately inevitable and has prompted reflection over how the pandemic elicited relatively progressive reforms to healthcare. Although we are concerned that the PHE's termination poses a significant threat to public health and equity, we believe that physicians, along with systemic changes, can provide critical support for patients as they navigate a shifting health policy landscape. In response to this evolving landscape, the article emphasizes the pivotal role of physicians and healthcare institutions in safeguarding patient access to care. It proposes strategies such as community-based workshops, patient navigators, and streamlined technology-driven redetermination processes to support vulnerable populations during this transition. Physicians are encouraged to engage in advocacy efforts, from voicing concerns at health meetings to collaborating with non-profit organizations and the media, to influence data-driven policy changes that prioritize patient safety and equitable access. Marginalized patients should not be slipping through the cracks.