The impact of community-acquired respiratory viral infections (CARVIs) in the transplant population has been highlighted by the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) following acute COVID-19 experienced significant morbidity and mortality. Few guidelines and reports suggest that HCT is deferred during persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positivity during and after infection, and is feasible only in fully recovered patients [1, 2]. However, those with high-risk haematological malignancies often progress and succumb to their disease without timely HCT. These two opposing pressures must therefore be reconciled, yet data are sparse on the optimal timing and safety of HCT that needs be performed during or immediately following acute COVID-19 infection.
In this study at Singapore General Hospital, the largest tertiary transplant centre in Singapore, the outcome of patients who underwent HCT following COVID-19 in the preceding 120 days or with active COVID-19 infection during transplant was analysed. A retrospective analysis of transplant-related outcomes in consecutive patients admitted for planned HCT between September 2021 and April 2022 was conducted. COVID-19 was detected by SARS-CoV-2 RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on nasopharyngeal swab. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 within 120 days prior to stem cell infusion were included in the study.
We identified 10 allogeneic and 1 autologous HCT patients. Median interval between diagnosis of COVID-19 to HCT infusion was 53 days (range 1–118). Median duration of COVID-19 infection (defined by time to negative PCR) was 20 days. Six patients tested negative by PCR and 2 were prolonged low-level viral shedders, prior to HCT. Two patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 while receiving conditioning chemotherapy prior to HCT infusion, at days −1 and −3, respectively.
All allogeneic HCT patients were fully vaccinated with two doses of mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273) prior to infection. Median receptor binding domain IgG serology titre (Abbott assay) in vaccinated patients was 1301 AU/mL at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19 disease severity by National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines [3] was mild in nine patients, moderate in one patient and critical in one patient. Eight patients received antivirals with or without concurrent monoclonal antibodies (mab; sotrovimab, n = 4; casirivimab–imdevimab, n = 1).
Patient characteristics and outcomes are summarised in Table 1, and transplant-related details are provided in Supporting Information Table 1. Two patients died of non-relapse pulmonary complications on days +43 and +50 post-HCT. There were no instances of grade III–IV acute graft versus host disease and no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection or late complications, or increase in vira
Dear Editor,
We would like to share ideas on the publication “Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in patients with hematological malignancies in the Omicron era: respiratory failure, need for mechanical ventilation and mortality in seronegative and seropositive patients [1].” Researchers compared patients based on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology in order to examine the outcomes of hematologic malignancy (HM) patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 2022 to March 2023 in this retrospective single-center analysis. Of the 112 patients in the research, 39% had a negative serology for SARS-CoV-2. Comparing seronegative individuals to seropositive patients, the findings showed that the former were older, had a higher likelihood of a lymphoid neoplasm, had anti-CD20 medication, and had a more severe illness. Additionally, a Kaplan–Meier study revealed that patients who tested negative for COVID-19 were more likely to experience respiratory failure, require mechanical ventilation, and die from the virus.
This study's retrospective approach, which can create biases and restrictions in data collection and analysis, is one of its drawbacks. Furthermore, the research was carried out at a single facility, which can restrict how broadly the results can be applied to other demographics. Additionally, it is possible that the sample size of 112 patients was insufficient to make firm conclusions, particularly when comparing the outcomes of HM patients who were seronegative and those who were seropositive. Furthermore, the study did not look into any confounding factors that might have affected the patients' results.
Conducting a bigger multicenter prospective study to validate the results of this study and improve the generalizability of the results could be one of the next directions for this area of research. Furthermore, analyzing the effects of various treatment modalities on outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-infected HM patients may offer insightful information for clinical practice. Furthermore, investigating the immune response and its impact on illness outcomes and progression in seronegative HM patients may aid in deciphering the underlying processes of COVID-19 in this particular cohort. Last but not least, examining the long-term consequences of COVID-19 for HM patients, such as the likelihood of relapse and late sequelae, may yield crucial data for patient management and post-treatment care.
Ideas, writing, analyzing, and approval (50%): Hinpetch Daungsupawong. Ideas, supervision, and approval (50%): Viroj Wiwanitkit.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
The authors have confirmed that ethical approval statement is not needed for this submission.
The authors have confirmed that patient consent statement is not needed for this submission.
The authors h
Relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure in patients with myeloid malignancies even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We observed a particularly low incidence of relapse in patients prepared with fludarabine, busulfan and melphalan in our previous study and this multicenter retrospective analysis aimed to confirm the feasibility of the regimen and to identify the potential prognostic factors. This study was performed using registry data from adults patients with myeloid malignancies who underwent their first allo-HSCT following fludarabine(≥100 mg/m2), busulfan (≥3.2 mg/kg) and melphalan (≥100 mg/m2) based conditioning at nine transplantation centers in China between Jan. 2020 and Mar. 2022. A total of 221 consecutive patients (AML n = 171, MDS-IB-1 or 2 n = 44, CMML n = 6) with median age of 46 were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 507 days for survivors. The 2-year NRM, CIR, OS and DFS were 10.6% ± 2.2%, 14.8% ± 3.3%, 79.4% ± 3.7% and 74.6% ± 3.7%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, high HCT-CI (≥3) was the only independent factor for higher NRM [hazard ratio (HR), 2.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11 to 7.90; p = 0.030] and ECOG score ≥2 was the only independent factor for inferior OS (HR, 2.43; 95%CI, 1.15 to 5.16; p = 0.020) and DFS (HR, 2.12; 95%CI, 1.13 to 4.02; p = 0.020). AML diagnosis and positive measurable residual disease (MRD) at transplantation were predictors for higher CIR (HR = 7.92, 95%CI 1.05-60.03, p = 0.045; HR = 3.64, 95%CI 1.40-9.44, p = 0.008; respectively), while post-transplantation cyclophosphamide based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was associated with lower CIR (HR = 0.24 95%CI 0.11-0.54, p = 0.001). The intensity of conditioning regimen did not impact CIR, NRM, DFS and OS. These results supported that double alkylating agents of busulfan and melphalan based conditioning regimens were associated with low relapse rate and acceptable NRM in adult patients with myeloid malignancies. The optimal dose remained to be confirmed by further prospective studies.