Foot & ankle specialist最新文献

Introduction: Large bone defects such as those encountered after failed total ankle replacement have previously been a relative contraindication to revision ankle replacement due to inadequate bone stock. We describe our experience and patient reported outcomes with a modular ankle replacement system with tibial and talar augments.

Methods: This is a retrospective case series analysis of patients who underwent a total ankle replacement using the INVISION system across 2 centers between 2016 and 2022. Patients completed the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and EQ-5D pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and re-operations. X-rays were reviewed for lucencies and alignment.

Results: A total of 17 patients were included in the study; 14 men and 3 women with an average age at the time of surgery of 67.9 years (range 56-80 years). The average follow-up post-operatively was 40.5 months (range 7-78) at the time of this study. The indication for surgery was revision of failed total ankle replacement (TAR) in 16 and revision of failed ankle fusion in 1. An augmented tibia was used in 13, an augmented talus in 13, and both augmented tibia and talus in 9 cases. There were no early surgical complications. One patient required debridement and implant retention for late deep infection. No implants have been revised. The average MOXFQ score improved by 19.3 points at most recent follow-up. The average AOS score improved by 25.2 points.

Conclusion: The early results of a modular augmented ankle arthroplasty system have shown satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication and re-operation rate and present another option for patients with larger bone defects. This is a small series, and a larger series with long-term follow-up would be beneficial.

Levels of evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs), such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), have gained traction as both augmentative tools in patient care but also as powerful synthesizing machines. The use of ChatGPT in orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery, particularly as an informative resource for patients, has not been described to date. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of information provided by ChatGPT in response to commonly asked questions about total ankle replacement (TAR).

Methods: ChatGPT was asked 10 frequently asked questions about TAR in a conversational thread. Responses were recorded without follow-up, and subsequently graded A, B, C, or F, corresponding with "excellent response," "adequate response needing mild clarification," "inadequate response needing moderate clarification," and "poor response needing severe clarification."

Results: Of the 10 responses, 2 were grade "A," 6 were grade "B," 2 were grade "C," and none were grade "F." Overall, the LLM provided good-quality responses to the posed prompts. Conclusion. Overall, the provided responses were understandable and representative of the current literature surrounding TAR. This study highlights the potential role LLMs in augmenting patient understanding of foot and ankle operative procedures.

Levels of evidence: IV.

Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between case volume and outcomes in foot and ankle surgery. This study elucidates surgical case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic foot and ankle fellowship training in the United States.

Methods: The ACGME provided case logs for orthopaedic residents and foot and ankle fellows (2018-2021). Variabilities in reported fellowship case volumes were defined as the fold-difference between 90th and 10th percentiles. Reported case volumes were compared between training cohorts with parametric tests.

Results: Case logs from 65 orthopaedic foot and ankle fellows and 3146 orthopaedic residents were included. Fellows reported 1.3- to 1.5-fold more foot and ankle cases during fellowship training than during residency training (P < .001). On average, orthopaedic foot and ankle fellows reported 405.4 cases and most were arthrodesis (17%), forefoot reconstruction (17%), mid/hindfoot reconstruction (13%), tendon repair/transfer (12%), and trauma ankle hindfoot (11%). Case categories with the highest variabilities were amputation (14.8-fold difference), infection/tumor (11.6-fold difference), arthroscopy (9.2-fold difference), and calcaneus (8.7-fold difference).

Discussion: Case volume benchmarks can assist trainees and faculty during orthopaedic foot and ankle training. More research is needed to determine case minimum requirements needed for autonomous practice in foot and ankle surgery.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Introduction: Total ankle replacement is indicated for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Periprosthetic radiolucency, from separation between the bone and implant, is suggested to be indicative of potential prosthesis failure risk. Anchoring implants with cement may mitigate this. This study aimed to compare rates of periprosthetic radiolucency between patients with cement-affixed and cementless implants.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 28 patients who underwent total ankle replacement with the INFINITY Total Ankle System (Wright Medical, Memphis, Tennessee) implant between January 2016 and May 2022. Anteroposterior, mortise, and lateral ankle X-rays were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers for tibiotalar angle, talar tilt, and periprosthetic radiolucency. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and chi-square test were performed.

Results: The incidence of periprosthetic radiolucency at the most recent follow-up did not significantly differ between cement and cementless groups (57.1% in both groups, P = 1.0). Follow-up tibiotalar and talar tilt angles were not significantly different (P > .51 for all comparisons).

Conclusions: Patients with cemented implants had a similar incidence of periprosthetic radiolucency compared with patients with cementless prostheses. Understanding of long-term clinical outcomes will help inform optimal operative approaches for ankle prostheses.

Levels of evidence: Therapeutic, Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Background: Partial growth arrest of the medial part of the distal tibial physis following fractures that penetrated the epiphysis is relatively common. We present the results of treatment, based on a protocol of supramalleolar tibial and fibular osteotomy for ankle alignment correction, and contralateral epiphysiodesis of distal tibia and fibula to balance leg length discrepancy (LLD).

Methods: This case series study describes the results of 7 patients with a median age of 14 years (range = 10-15 years) who were operated in our institution. All were treated by closed or open reduction and internal fixation after Salter-Harris (SH) types 3 and 4 fractures of the distal tibia. All patients had a partial medial growth arrest, distal tibial varus, relative overlengthening of the distal fibula, and slight leg shortening.

Treatment protocol: Contralateral distal tibial and fibular epiphysiodesis to prevent significant LLD, completion of closure of the ipsilateral epiphysis, supramalleolar osteotomy of the distal tibia and fibula, and insertion of a triangular wedge cortical allograft into the tibial osteotomy creating a normal ankle joint orientation. The osteotomy was supported by a medial anatomically contoured locking plate. The fibula was fixed with an intramedullary wire.

Results: All patients had uneventful healing of the osteotomy after 6 weeks. At the latest follow-up (mean 3 years, range 1.5-5 years), 6 out of 7 patients reached maturity, and the lateral distal tibial angle was within normal limits. The LLD in all patients was less than 8 mm.

Conclusions: Our protocol provides anatomic correction with the restoration of the ankle joint and prevents the progression of LLD.

Levels of evidence: Level IV.