Gastro hep advances最新文献

Hemangiomas in the gastrointestinal tract are extremely rare, benign vascular tumors, known for their associated complication of bleeding. They are usually difficult to diagnose, despite the characteristic definition of radiolucent phleboliths on radiology and purplish, tannish brown nodule or polyp on endoscopy. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice. We describe a rare case of sigmoid colon cavernous hemangioma in a 49-year-old male who underwent colonoscopy for lower abdominal pain and revealed a large pedunculated polyp in the sigmoid colon measuring 1.7 cm in diameter. The hemangioma was completely resected endoscopically via hot snare with a favorable outcome.

Background and Aims

Predicting the efficacy of molecular-targeted drugs (MTDs) is an unmet need in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) can be used to safely and repeatedly assess UC activity.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients who started MTD therapy for active UC and underwent IUS at baseline and 3 months after starting therapy were analyzed. Steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) and endoscopic improvement (EI) at 6 months were defined as a Lichtiger index of ≤3 and Mayo endoscopic subscore of ≤1 while continuing the MTD without steroid induction or surgery. Sonographically estimated EI (SE-EI) at 3 months was assessed based on a Milan Ultrasound Criterion of ≤6.2 and Kyorin Ultrasound Criterion for UC (bowel wall thickness of <3.8 mm and submucosa index of <50%).

Results

Thirty-one patients achieved SFCR at 6 months [SFCR(+) group]. The SFCR(+) group demonstrated significantly better improvement in bowel wall thickness and bowel wall vascularity at 3 months than the SFCR(−) group. The Milan Ultrasound Criterion and UC-IUS index also improved significantly more in the SFCR(+) than SFCR(−) group. The areas under the curve of these parameters for predicting SFCR were approximately 0.80. Colonoscopy was performed for 28 patients at 6 months, and 15 patients achieved EI. SE-EI at 3 months was significantly associated with achievement of EI at 6 months. The positive predictive values of SE-EI at 3 months for SFCR and EI at 6 months were 100%.

Conclusion

Sonographic improvements in 3 months predicted the clinical and endoscopic efficacy of MTD therapy at 6 months, suggesting the longitudinal significance of IUS monitoring for UC treatment.

Background and Aims

The multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) assay is a noninvasive average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test. A new biomarker panel was developed for a next-generation test to improve specificity while maintaining/increasing sensitivity. We aimed first to establish an algorithm and cutoff for the next-generation mt-sDNA test and then to validate it using archived samples from the pivotal DeeP-C study (NCT01397747) of the first-generation test.

Methods

Algorithm development and cross-validation included 3011 samples from 2 specimen collection studies (NCT03821948 and NCT03789162). The algorithm and cutoff were locked before validation. Validation test set samples included 57 CRC, 583 advanced precancerous lesions (APLs), and 7022 samples negative for CRC or APLs from the DeeP-C study, which prospectively enrolled average-risk, asymptomatic adults aged 50–84 years before screening colonoscopy. Next-generation biomarkers included methylated DNA markers ceramide synthase 4 gene, leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 4 gene, serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A 56 kDa regulatory subunit gamma isoform gene, and zinc finger DHHC-type containing 1 gene (reference marker), and fecal hemoglobin. Primary validation end points were CRC sensitivity and specificity for the absence of advanced neoplasia. Secondary end points included APL sensitivity and specificity for non-neoplastic findings or negative colonoscopy.

Results

Cross-validation and best-fit results from algorithm development closely matched, confirming algorithm reliability and reproducibility. For the test set, next-generation mt-sDNA test sensitivity was 93.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.0%–98.1%) for CRC and 48.4% (95% CI, 44.2%–52.5%) for APLs. Specificity was 88.5% (95% CI, 87.7%–89.2%) for the absence of advanced neoplasia and 90.4% (95% CI, 89.5%–91.2%) for the combination of non-neoplastic findings or negative colonoscopy.

Conclusion

Based on archived samples, the next-generation mt-sDNA test demonstrated promising CRC screening performance characteristics that will be further assessed in a prospective clinical validation study (BLUE-C; NCT04144738).

Background and Aims

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects about 262 million people worldwide, leading to over 820,000 deaths each year primarily due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The World Health Organization has pledged to eliminate HBV as a health threat by 2030, but currently, no countries are on track to achieve this goal. One of the barriers to HBV elimination is stigma, causing shame, denial, self-isolation, self-rejection, and depression leading to those with chronic HBV less likely to get tested or seek treatment and more likely to conceal their infection. Other barriers include limited access to care and complicated and restrictive clinical practice guidelines. Increasing public and political efforts are necessary to raise awareness, increase access to care, and change screening and treatment guidelines. The current guidance of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends testing only if patients are considered at risk, but this has proven to be ineffective. We propose a simplified “test all and treat all” approach with a 5-line guideline for HBV infection. Universal screening and treatment of adults is cost-effective and can prevent transmission by effectively managing chronic HBV. All patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive with detectable HBV-DNA should receive treatment until HBsAg is undetectable for 12 months, as HBV-DNA transmission via blood transfusion can occur even at low viral loads of 16 copies/mL, and mother-to-child transmission is still a risk even with passive-active immunoprophylaxis. Furthermore, clinical outcomes after HBsAg clearance are significantly better than the clinical outcomes of those who remain HBsAg positive.

Background and Aims

The entry inhibitor bulevirtide represents the first specific treatment for hepatitis-D virus (HDV)-infected patients. In clinical trials, around 80% of patients achieve normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) with about 60% virological response after 1 year, but little is known about the dynamics of responses and clinical predictors of treatment outcomes. We report our single-center data from 15 patients and describe response dynamics, clinical outcomes, and predictive factors for treatment response.

Methods

Retrospective data from 15 patients have been analyzed at our department who started treatment with bulevirtide between 10/2020 and 08/2022. According to our standard procedures, laboratory parameters were controlled monthly; transient elastography was performed every 3 months, and the treatment duration was 12 months.

Results

Treatment response rates after 1 year of treatment were similar to published data from clinical trials. ALT normalization usually occurs between months 2–6 of treatment, followed by a virological response after ≥6 months. Patients with more severe hepatitis at the start of treatment were less likely to respond in the first year of treatment. Loss of HDV-RNA was observed in one-third of patients after ≥1 year of treatment. Low body mass index and high alpha-fetoprotein at baseline were possible predictors of a delayed treatment response.

Conclusion

Bulevirtide is a safe treatment option for HDV, leading to a fast hepatological response. Of note, decrease in transaminases precedes virological response. Patients with high viral load and ALT levels respond slower, but nonresponders (as classified by Food and Drug Administration criteria) still show a reduction in viremia. Longer observation periods are required to determine the optimal duration of bulevirtide monotherapy.