Global implementation research and applications最新文献

This scoping review describes the state of the literature regarding Implementation Strategy Mapping Methods (ISMMs) within the context of child mental health practice delivery. Goals included (a) identify and describe ISMMs addressing determinants of implementing mental health evidence-based interventions (MH-EBIs) for children and (b) describe the scope of the literature (e.g., outcomes, remaining gaps) related to identified ISMMs. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, 197 articles were identified. After removing 54 duplicates, 152 titles and abstracts were screened, yielding 36 articles that were screened during the full-text review. The final sample included four studies and two protocol papers (n = 6). A data charting codebook was developed a priori to capture relevant information (e.g., outcomes) and content analysis was utilized to synthesize findings. Six ISMMs were identified: innovation tournament, concept mapping, modified conjoint analysis, COAST-IS, focus group, and intervention mapping. ISMMs were successful in leading to the identification and selection of implementation strategies at participating organizations, and all ISMMs included stakeholders throughout these processes. Findings revealed the novelty of this research area and highlighted numerous areas for future investigation. Implications related to implementation, service, and client outcomes are discussed, including the possible impact of utilizing ISMMs to increase access to MH-EBIs for children receiving services in community settings. Overall, these findings contribute to our understanding of one of the five priority areas within implementation strategy research-enhancing methods used to design and tailor implementation strategies-by providing an overview of methods that may be utilized to facilitate MH-EBI implementation in child mental health care settings. Trial Registration: Not applicable.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-023-00086-3.

Person-centered recovery planning (PCRP) has been a key aspect in mental health system transformation and delivering quality health care. Despite the mandate to deliver this practice and a growing evidence base, its implementation and understanding of implementation processes in behavioral health settings remain a challenge. New England Mental Health Technology Transfer Center (MHTTC) launched the PCRP in Behavioral Health Learning Collaborative to support agencies' implementation efforts through training and technical assistance. In an effort to explore and understand the internal implementation process changes facilitated by the learning collaborative, the authors conducted qualitative key informant interviews with the participants and the leadership of the PCRP learning collaborative. The interviews revealed the processes that are part of the PCRP implementation efforts, including staff training, changing agency policies and procedures, modifying treatment planning tools, and the structure of the electronic health records. The higher prior organizational investment and readiness for change, building staff's competencies in PCRP, leadership investment, and frontline staff buy-in act as factors that facilitate the implementation of PCRP in behavioral health settings. Our findings inform both the implementation of PCRP in behavioral health settings and future efforts of organizing multi-agency learning collaboratives to support PCRP implementation.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-023-00078-3.

The purpose of this article is to consider the changing context for implementation research and practice and new approaches which might now be more relevant for some implementation objectives. Factors that hindered implementation of evidence-based practices before the COVID-19 pandemic was an anti-science culture, strengthened by different media and appeals to emotion and identity. The article questions how effective are the rational-cognitive and individual models of change that frequency informs our research and practice. It describes challenges we face and considers methods we could use that might be more effective, including research-informed narrative methods, participatory research and practice, especially with culturally and linguistically diverse peoples, and adaptive implementation.

The Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, an international consortium developed in partnership with the World Health Organization, is addressing childhood obesity from a life-course perspective. It hypothesises that an integrated complex intervention from preconception, through pregnancy, infancy and early childhood, will reduce childhood adiposity and non-communicable disease risk, and improve child development. As part of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative in South Africa, the Bukhali randomised controlled trial is being conducted with 18-28-year-old women in Soweto, where young women face numerous challenges to their physical and mental health. The aims of this paper were to describe the intervention development process (including adaptations), intervention components, and process evaluation; and to highlight key lessons learned. Intervention materials have been developed according to the life-course stages: preconception (Bukhali), pregnancy (Bukhali Baby), infancy (Bukhali Nana; birth-2 years), and early childhood (Bukhali Mntwana, 2-5 years). The intervention is delivered by community health workers, and includes the provision of health literacy resources, multi-micronutrient supplementation, in-person health screening, services and referral, nutrition risk support, SMS-reminders and telephonic contacts to assist with behaviour change goals. A key adaption is the incorporation of principles of trauma-information care, given the mental health challenges faced by participants. The Bukhali process evaluation is focussing on context, implementation and mechanisms of impact, using a mixed methods approach. Although the completion of the trial is still a number of years away, the documentation of the intervention development process and process evaluation of the trial can provide lessons for the development, implementation, and evaluation of such complex life-course trials.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-023-00073-8.

The aim of the BETTER WISE intervention is to address cancer and chronic disease prevention and screening (CCDPS) and lifestyle risks in patients aged 40-65. The purpose of this qualitative study is to better understand facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the intervention. Patients were invited for a 1-h visit with a prevention practitioner (PP), a member of a primary care team, with specific skills in prevention, screening, and cancer survivorship. We collected and analyzed data from 48 key informant interviews and 17 focus groups conducted with 132 primary care providers and from 585 patient feedback forms. We analyzed all qualitative data using a constant comparative method informed by grounded theory and then employed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in a second round of coding. The following key elements were identified: (1) Intervention characteristics-relative advantage and adaptability; (2) Outer setting-PPs compensating for increased patient needs and decreased resources; (3) Characteristics of individuals-PPs (patients and physicians described PPs as compassionate, knowledgeable, and helpful); (4) Inner setting-network and communication (collaboration and support in teams or lack thereof); and (5) Process-executing the implementation (pandemic-related issues hindered execution, but PPs adapted to challenges). This study identified key elements that facilitated or hindered the implementation of BETTER WISE. Despite the interruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the BETTER WISE intervention continued, driven by the PPs and their strong relationships with their patients, other primary care providers, and the BETTER WISE team.

Self-efficacy is central to community health workers' capacity and motivation to deliver evidence-based care; thus, validated measures of self-efficacy are needed to assess the effectiveness of community health worker programs. In this study, we culturally adapted and evaluated the General Self-Efficacy Scale among community health workers in Uganda using multiple methods. We adapted the ten-item General Self-Efficacy Scale through cross-cultural discussions within our multidisciplinary research team, translation from English into Luganda and back-translation into English, and six cognitive interviews with community health workers. We administered the adapted scale in a staged, two-part cross-sectional study, including a total of 147 community health workers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded three factors, which we labeled problem-solving, persistence, and resourcefulness. This three-factor solution had good model fit (standardized root mean square residual = 0.07) and explained 53.4% of the variance. We found evidence of convergent validity, as scores for the total scale were positively correlated with years of experience (r = 0.48; p < .001) and perceived social support (r = 0.39, p < .001). Scores were also higher among those with higher educational attainment in one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests [F (2,72) = 9.16, p < .001]. We also found evidence of discriminant validity, as scores for the total scale were not correlated with age (r = - 0.07, p = .55), in agreement with literature showing that general self-efficacy is an age-independent construct. The internal consistency of the adapted scale was within the acceptable range for a pilot study (Cronbach's α = 0.61). This evaluation of a Uganda-adapted General Self-Efficacy Scale demonstrated promising psychometric properties; however, larger studies with repeated measures are warranted to further assess the adapted scale's factor structure, validity, reliability, and stability over time.