Implementation science communications最新文献

Background: Youth living with HIV (YLH) are disproportionately impacted by HIV with poor outcomes along the entire HIV care continuum. In a 2020-2022 pilot study, iCARE Nigeria, successfully tested a combination intervention incorporating mobile health technology and peer navigation to: 1) improve testing and linkage to HIV care for young men, especially young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and 2) improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes for YLH. The intervention was scaled up to 5 sites in 3 Nigerian cities. Implementation research was used to understand site perspectives on feasibility, readiness and potential facilitators and barriers soon after scale-up commencement.

Methods: An explanatory mixed-methods implementation study was conducted, including quantitative surveys on adoption and reach among peer navigators (PNs) and other study staff (55 testing, 172 treatment), and interviews and focus group discussions with PNs and other study staff in both intervention groups (n = 31). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (quantitative) and directed content analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and RE-AIM (qualitative).

Results: Early into scale-up, PNs and other study staff in the testing and treatment interventions reported high readiness, adoption, feasibility, and appropriateness. Facilitating factors and strategies across both interventions, included supportive institutional culture, ongoing supportive supervision, provision of a manual and training, relevant PN working experiences, communication methods designed to ensure anonymity of targeted youth (testing) or confidentiality (treatment), and access to cellular data and internet. Facilitators specific to each intervention were also identified including PN knowledge of the MSM community, using multiple social media platforms for outreach (testing) and problem-solving by PN and staff to respond to client needs (treatment). Barriers in both interventions included client financial and transportation challenges, and societal stigma. Intervention-specific barriers included legal limitations for MSM and few YMSM friendly clinics (testing), limited client financial resources and cell-phone access (treatment).

Conclusions: Implementers of the initial scale-up of both components of the iCARE Nigeria intervention reported high readiness and adoption, supported by implementation strategies and facilitating factors including intervention design. These results are important for informing future work to scale-out iCARE and similar interventions to new settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04950153, retrospectively registered July 6, 2021, https:// clinicaltrials.gov/.

Background: Approximately one in six children has a disability, and effective, evidence-based rehabilitation can ameliorate the impact of these conditions over the lifespan. However, implementing interventions in real-world settings remains a challenge. This scoping review aimed to summarize the characteristics, implementation strategies, and outcomes of implementation studies in pediatric rehabilitation.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from the database inception to December 2, 2022. Studies testing implementation strategies in pediatric rehabilitation interventions were included. Data extracted included study characteristics (e.g., country, intervention type, field of rehabilitation), implementation strategies characterized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and outcomes based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework.

Results: Of the 11,740 studies identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 15, 34%) or Canada (n = 10, 23%) and used a mixed-methods design (n = 13, 30%). Interventions primarily targeted motor skills (n = 19, 43%) and were conducted in outpatient settings (n = 14, 32%) or homes (n = 11, 23%). The most commonly used implementation strategies were "train and educate key informant" (n = 21, 48%) and "use evaluative/iterative strategies" (n = 19, 43%). Feasibility (n = 19, 43%) and acceptability (n = 16, 36%) were the most frequently targeted implementation outcomes.

Conclusions: Reporting implementation strategies and outcomes in pediatric rehabilitation studies is limited and highly variable. Most strategies focused on developing and sharing educational materials, while administrative and systems-level interventions were largely absent. Standardized documentation of implementation strategies and outcomes could advance the field's understanding of the effective development of interventions designed for implementation, encouraging faster uptake of effective interventions.

Background: Archetypes are representations of a group of people with shared behaviors, attitudes, and characteristics. The design and use of archetypes have potential application to increase partnership and support when embedding and scaling interventions but methodological approaches have not been developed.

Objective: To describe the methodology of designing archetypes for use in a pragmatic trial of advance care planning in the primary care context, SHARING Choices ((NCT04819191). We present resulting archetypes representing three key roles (primary care champion, advance care planning facilitator, and patient) in our pragmatic trial.

Methods: Our process for developing archetypes involved 4 steps: 1) Identify roles for archetype development, 2) Identify Shareholders and Data Sources for Archetype Development, 3) Generate unique archetypes and their distinguishing traits, and 4) Iteratively refine archetypes through exposure, scrutiny, and shareholder input. We also developed a process map to communicate our methodology.

Results: We created 6 distinct archetypes for the primary care champion role, 5 archetypes for the advance care planning facilitator role and 6 archetypes for the patient role. For each archetype we described strengths, challenges, prevailing emotions, and successful approaches to collaboration (e.g., "what works for me"). Unique opportunities for synergy between archetypes (such as with facilitator and champion) and potential challenges between archetypes (such as for facilitator and patient) suggest ways to improve training and support of key roles.

Discussion: Our process for creating archetypes for use in implementation research was iterative and informative in discussion of implementation with shareholders. We expect this methodology to be useful for anticipating and analyzing many aspects of implementation.

Background: Rural School Support Strategies (RS3) is a bundle of implementation supports (including training, technical assistance, and a virtual learning collaborative) designed for the scale-up of universal prevention initiatives. This study addresses mechanisms of action, exploring whether positive effects of RS3 on implementation fidelity are attributable to improvements in functioning of school implementation teams, and increases in organizational readiness.

Methods: Data are from a cluster-randomized hybrid Type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial of RS3 among rural Idaho schools implementing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). Forty public K-12 schools in Idaho, located in rural areas or townships, were recruited for the trial and were equally randomized to either the basic supports condition, including standard trainings, or to the RS3 condition. Condition was not masked. The mechanistic aims were hypothesized prior to the trial and tested with survey data from individuals on each school's implementation team (n = 205). Surveys were collected in spring 2019 and 2020 regarding organizational readiness and team functioning. The outcome measure was PBIS implementation fidelity, measured by school teams during the summers of 2019 and 2020 using the Tiered Fidelity Inventory. School-level path models tested the effect of RS3 on implementation fidelity, controlling for baseline, school grade level, and school location. Multilevel (2-1-2) mediation models tested the degree to which individual team members' perceptions of organizational readiness and team functioning mediated the relationship between school-level experimental condition and fidelity, controlling for the team members' role.

Results: Schools receiving RS3 reported significantly greater implementation fidelity, although effects were slightly reduced (b = 8.40, p = .056, 95% CI [-0.22,17.01], β = 0.54) after inclusion of baseline and demographic controls. Models indicated a significant indirect effect of RS3 on fidelity through increased team productivity (b = 6.30, SE = 2.63, p = .017, MC 95% CI [0.83,13.86], β = 0.21), and effects through organizational readiness, change commitment, team culture, and team goal setting.

Conclusions: External supports may improve implementation of universal prevention initiatives in rural schools through improvements in readiness and fostering teaming in organizations.

Trial registration: This research was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03736395 ), on November 9, 2018.

Background: Studies have demonstrated that standardizing labor induction (IOL), often with the use of protocols, may reduce racial inequities in obstetrics. IOL protocols are complex, multi-component interventions. To target identified implementation barriers, audit and feedback (A&F) was selected as an implementation strategy. Here, we aimed to understand the acceptability and effect of A&F on fidelity to this complex intervention through quantitative and qualitative approaches.

Methods: This secondary analysis of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (10/2018-12/2022) compared 2 years before (PRE) to 2 years after (POST) implementation of an IOL protocol at two sites. Fidelity to each of 8 specific protocol components was collected via chart review. During the POST period, unit-aggregated A&F reports were distributed via email every 3 months to site clinicians. Reports tracked fidelity to protocol components over time. For this analysis, we compared component fidelity PRE to POST-implementation. Additionally, during the POST period, we compared fidelity by month after each A&F (Month#1 v. Month#2/3) to evaluate the effect of A&F over time. Acceptability of A&F reports was evaluated using qualitative interviews.

Results: 8509 labor inductions were included (PRE = 4214, POST = 4295). A&F reports were successfully distributed every 3 months for the 2-year POST period. PRE to POST-implementation, fidelity to 4 of the 8 components increased significantly (cervical Foley utilization, latent labor examination frequency, amniotomy timing, and intrauterine pressure catheter utilization), without change in the other 4 components. For 2 of those 4 components where improvement was noted, there was no difference in fidelity by month after A&F report; rather, there was sustained improvement across the POST-implementation period. On the other hand, for the remaining 2 components, fidelity peaked in the first month after each A&F report, with some decline in the following 2 months prior to the next A&F report. Qualitative analysis (n = 24) supported A&F acceptability, with A&F described as "motivating" and "helpful."

Conclusions: A&F was an effective implementation strategy to promote fidelity to certain components of this labor induction protocol. With some decline in effect after the first month POST-A&F report, increased A&F frequency should be considered in future work targeting obstetric outcomes, as well as health inequities.

Background: Pain management after childbirth is widely variable, increasing risk of untreated pain, opioid harms, and inequitable experiences of care. The Creating Optimal Pain Management FOR Tailoring Care (COMFORT) clinical practice guideline (CPG) seeks to promote evidence-based, equitable acute peripartum pain management in the United States. We aimed to identify contextual conditions (i.e., barriers and facilitators) and discrete implementation strategies (i.e., theory-based actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) likely to influence COMFORT CPG uptake and specify corresponding multi-component implementation interventions at the perinatal quality collaborative- and unit-level.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study involving virtual individual interviews and focus groups. Interviews included individuals undergoing childbirth from 2018-2023, (recruited through two online registries), and actively practicing maternity clinicians and surgeons, (recruited via snowball sampling with the eDelphi panel creating the COMFORT CPG), caring for pregnant people in the United States. Focus groups included physicians, midwives, nurses, and unit-based quality improvement (QI) staff working at Michigan hospitals within the Obstetrics Initiative, a statewide perinatal quality collaborative funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and Replicating Effective Programs framework informed data collection and analysis. Qualitative content analysis characterized influential contextual conditions, which were linked to implementation strategies and tools using principles of implementation mapping. We then specified multi-component implementation interventions for use by quality collaboratives and unit-based teams.

Results: From May-September 2023, we completed 57 semi-structured individual interviews (31 patients, 26 clinicians) and six focus groups (44 QI champions). Participants identified 10 key conditions influential for COMFORT CPG adoption. Findings enabled identification of five collaborative-level implementation strategies, 27 unit-level implementation strategies, and 12 associated tools to promote COMFORT CPG adoption including the specification of each strategy's hypothesized mechanism of action and each tool's goal and potential uses.

Conclusions: This work identifies contextual conditions and implementation strategies and tools at the perinatal quality collaborative and unit levels to promote COMFORT CPG adoption on maternity units. These findings may foster more rapid CPG implementation and thereby promote more equitable and evidence-based perinatal pain management care.

Background: Doulas, non-clinical professionals who provide support throughout the perinatal period, can positively impact patient experiences and clinical outcomes during birth. Doulas often support hospital-based births without being employed by the hospital system, resulting in varied relationships with hospitals and clinicians. Systems-level changes are needed to maximize collaboration between hospitals and doulas to ensure facilitation of, and not barriers to, doula support. We implemented and evaluated a new program, called the "Supportive Birth Collaborative," to maximize effectiveness of doula support in hospital settings.

Methods: We conducted a single-site feasibility study of the use of implementation mapping to make systemic changes to clinician-doula collaboration for labor and delivery. Implementation mapping consisted of five steps: developing a collaborative of program implementers and knowledge holders, conducting a needs assessment, developing a logic model, applying implementation strategies, and evaluating changes in outcomes. To evaluate change, process data were collected throughout, and implementation outcomes were measured in 2022 and again after one year of implementation via online surveys to all clinicians who provided labor and delivery care. Descriptive statistics were calculated and change over time was analyzed in Stata using log-binomial regression models with clustering to account for respondents who completed both surveys.

Results: The "Supportive Birth Collaborative" (SBC) was founded in November 2021. The first meeting included 19 people, who were obstetricians, anesthesiologists, nurses, doulas, students, social workers, administrators, researchers, and individuals who had given birth at the study hospital. From 2022-2023, the SBC adopted 11 implementation strategies and piloted or fully implemented 10 of them. Implementation strategies ranged from making training dynamic, to changes in the physical environment, to changes in formal policy. In 2022, 104 clinicians participated in the survey; 97 participated in 2023. There was significant improvement in clinician-reported trust in doulas (0.23, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.34) and doula-clinician communication (0.25, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.38). Clinicians had a limited understanding of the doula's role, and that understanding did not significantly improve.

Conclusions: Using implementation mapping as a guide to collaborative work can lead to meaningful health system changes. Regular review of implementation outcomes could allow for adaptation and tailoring of implementation strategies.

Background: All for Them is a theory-based and evidence-informed multilevel, multicomponent program delivered through schools to increase HPV vaccination among medically underserved youth across Texas. Given the potential logistical challenges of program implementation, understanding how to best support the implementation and sustainment of the program is critical. The overall goals of this study are twofold: 1) develop a multifaceted implementation strategy, Implementing All for Them (IM-AFT); and 2) evaluate the impact of IM-AFT on implementation outcomes for schools and healthcare providers to successfully implement All for Them in their respective settings.

Methods: This study is underpinned by a comprehensive and synergistic conceptual framework. We will use Social Cognitive Theory and the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation to inform important individual and organizational factors to target as part of implementation strategy development. We will use this formative work and Implementation Mapping, a systematic, iterative process that guides the use of theories, models, and frameworks, to develop IM-AFT. The three core aims of the present study are connected to the five tasks of Implementation Mapping. For Aim 1, we will develop IM-AFT using a community-based participatory research-informed approach, including a qualitative assessment of needs and assets associated with program implementation and identification of behavioral and psychosocial objectives to determine implementation outcomes. For Aim 2, we will use a mixed-methods approach to assess user experience with the IM-AFT prototype to test its feasibility, usability, and acceptability. For Aim 3, we will use a descriptive checklist to assess the impact of IM-AFT on user fidelity of program implementation.

Discussion: This paper presents the detailed protocol for developing and evaluating IM-AFT to successfully implement All for Them, leveraging a systematic, community- and theory-based approach and user experience with the strategy prototype. This study will contribute to expanding limited scientific knowledge about using multiple sources to develop and evaluate specified implementation strategies for effective implementation of school-based vaccination programs. Theory-based IM-AFT will guide collaborations between schools and community health centers to improve HPV and other adolescent vaccination rates in underserved communities in Texas.

Background: Youth involved in the legal system have disproportionately higher rates of problematic substance use than non-involved youth. Identifying and connecting legal-involved youth to substance use intervention is critical and relies on the connection between legal and behavioral health agencies, which may be facilitated by learning health systems (LHS). We analyzed the impact of an LHS intervention on youth legal and behavioral health personnel ratings of their cross-system collaboration. We also examined organizational climate toward evidence-based practice (EBP) over and above the LHS intervention.

Methods: Data were derived from a type II hybrid effectiveness trial implementing an LHS intervention with youth legal and community mental health centers (CMHCs) in eight Indiana counties. Using a stepped wedge design, counties were randomly assigned to one of three cohorts and stepped in at nine-month intervals. Counties were in the treatment phase for 18 months, after which they were in the maintenance phase. Youth legal system and CMHC personnel completed five waves of data collection (n=307 total respondents, ranging from 108-178 per wave). Cross-system collaboration was measured via the Cultural Exchange Inventory, organizational EBP climate via the Implementation Climate Scale and Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale, and intervention via a dummy-coded indicator variable. We conducted linear mixed models to examine: 1) the treatment indicator, and 2) the treatment indicator and organizational EBP climate variables on cross-system collaboration.

Results: The treatment indicator was not significantly associated with cross-system collaboration. When including the organizational EBP climate variables, the treatment indicator significantly predicted cross-system collaboration. Compared to the control phase, treatment (B=0.41, standard error [SE]=0.20) and maintenance (B=0.60, SE=0.29) phases were associated with greater cross-system collaboration output.

Conclusions: The analysis may have been underpowered to detect an effect; third variables may have explained variance in cross-system collaboration, and, thus, the inclusion of important covariates may have reduced residual errors and increased the estimation precision. The LHS intervention may have affected cross-system collaboration perception and offers a promising avenue of research to determine how systems work together to improve legal-involved-youth substance use outcomes. Future research is needed to replicate results among a larger sample and examine youth-level outcomes.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04499079. Registered 30 July 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04499079 .

Background: In many Asian jurisdictions, patients are required to obtain referrals from registered doctors before consulting physiotherapists. In contrast, countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia have a direct access model for physiotherapists designed across different healthcare settings and under prescribed conditions. While research has demonstrated the benefits of direct access, issues remain on the appropriate policy design for direct access in the context of patient safety and organizational challenges in the implementation. Recently the policy to allow direct access in primary care context is being considered in Hong Kong. This study aims to examine the intervention design options for the policy of direct access to physiotherapists and identify corresponding implementation strategies, to inform the appropriate intervention design for direct access to physiotherapists and the implementation strategies.

Methods: We adopt a systematic process for developing the design of the policy and the implementation strategies using an Implementation Mapping approach informed by Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We will conduct literature reviews to understand the different aspects of policy intervention design and employ qualitative in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to understand key stakeholders' perspectives related to the direct access model. The identified barriers and facilitators associated with policy implementation of an acceptable intervention design will inform the development of an effective implementation strategy tailored to the implementation context. Our approach will involve mapping the research evidence and the subsequent findings from the stakeholders' deliberations into the CFIR domains and referencing the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to develop the acceptable intervention characteristics and the corresponding implementation strategies. These insights will be further validated in a Delphi Expert Survey, for a consensus-based approach.

Discussion: This study employs a sequential mixed-method approach to explore the intervention characteristics for an acceptable intervention design in the policy formulation and the corresponding implementation strategy for direct access to physiotherapists. Integrating research insights into actionable policy recommendations and refining these recommendations in a Delphi Survey will inform the appropriate policy intervention design and implementation strategy for direct access to physiotherapy services.