Recently, the use of ultrasound (US) for triggering drug release to specific tissues was explored, but its direct effects on cells have not been thoroughly understood. For this reason, this study aimed to investigate the impact of US powers and US irradiation times on fibroblast cells (NIH-3T3). The results showed that the diverse US settings had varying effects on cell proliferation and distribution in the polystyrene culture dish. Interestingly, at 10 W, 43 kHz with changing exposed time up to 30 min either stimulated or inhibited fibroblast cell growth after 24 and 72 h of cultivation compared to the control sample in the absence of US, while longer US exposure time led to a moderate reduction in cell quantity. Moreover, higher US levels of 20 and 30 W could cause an aggregation of cells and sublethal damage to the cells. Importantly, the morphology of fibroblast was changed from stellate-shape to round-shape under greater US powers. Elevated US power also influenced interactions between proteins and lipids, affecting the atomic and molecular charges, leading to changes in both zeta potential and pH of the dispensed cell solution.
最近,人们探索了利用超声波(US)触发药物释放到特定组织的方法,但对其对细胞的直接影响还没有深入了解。因此,本研究旨在探讨 US 功率和 US 照射时间对成纤维细胞(NIH-3T3)的影响。结果显示,不同的 US 设置对聚苯乙烯培养皿中细胞的增殖和分布有不同的影响。有趣的是,与无 US 的对照样品相比,在 10 W、43 kHz 的条件下,暴露时间最长为 30 分钟,在培养 24 小时和 72 小时后,可刺激或抑制成纤维细胞的生长,而更长的 US 暴露时间会导致细胞数量的适度减少。此外,20 瓦和 30 瓦的较高 US 可导致细胞聚集,对细胞造成亚致死性损伤。重要的是,在更高的 US 功率下,成纤维细胞的形态从星状变为圆形。较高的 US 功率还会影响蛋白质和脂质之间的相互作用,影响原子和分子电荷,从而导致分配细胞溶液的 zeta 电位和 pH 值发生变化。
{"title":"Low-intensity continuous ultrasound effect on proliferation and morphology of fibroblast cells","authors":"Tu Minh Tran Vo, Guillermo Ignacio Guangorena Zarzosa, Keita Nakajima, Takaomi Kobayashi","doi":"10.1002/ird3.75","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ird3.75","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, the use of ultrasound (US) for triggering drug release to specific tissues was explored, but its direct effects on cells have not been thoroughly understood. For this reason, this study aimed to investigate the impact of US powers and US irradiation times on fibroblast cells (NIH-3T3). The results showed that the diverse US settings had varying effects on cell proliferation and distribution in the polystyrene culture dish. Interestingly, at 10 W, 43 kHz with changing exposed time up to 30 min either stimulated or inhibited fibroblast cell growth after 24 and 72 h of cultivation compared to the control sample in the absence of US, while longer US exposure time led to a moderate reduction in cell quantity. Moreover, higher US levels of 20 and 30 W could cause an aggregation of cells and sublethal damage to the cells. Importantly, the morphology of fibroblast was changed from stellate-shape to round-shape under greater US powers. Elevated US power also influenced interactions between proteins and lipids, affecting the atomic and molecular charges, leading to changes in both zeta potential and pH of the dispensed cell solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 3","pages":"318-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.75","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140983096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hanjun Zhang, Mingyue Song, Mingzhan Du, Zhuxue Zhang, Weiguo Zhang
<p>A 65-year-old woman was found to have a space-occupying lesion in the parenchyma of hepatic segment IV by ultrasonography during a routine medical checkup. She had no history of viral hepatitis or any infectious diseases, and her tumor markers and routine blood and biochemical indices were normal. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-defined lesion that showed homogeneous hypointensity on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity with a halo sign on T2-weighted images (Figure 1a,b). Diffusion-weighted imaging showed homogeneous restricted diffusion (Figure 1c,d), and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging showed hyperintensity in the arterial phase with no Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in the hepatobiliary phase (Figure 1e–g). A maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) of 3.270 and a delayed SUV<sub>max</sub> of 4.887 were recorded on <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scans (Figure 2a–d). The plasma cell variant of Castleman's disease was confirmed pathologically after left hemihepatectomy. Immunohistochemical analysis showed lymphoid hyperplasia, positive immunostaining for CD markers, and a Ki-67 index of 40% (Figure 2e,f). No recurrence has been noted on annual computed tomography scans after the 6-month follow-up.</p><p>Castleman's disease, also known as angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia and giant lymph node hyperplasia [<span>1</span>], rarely arises in the hepatic parenchyma. Clinically, Castleman's disease can be divided into unicentric (UCD) and multicentric (MCD). UCD and idiopathic MCD are classified into tumor-like lesions with B-cell predominance according to the fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumors [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>UCD usually presents as a localized lesion without any obvious symptoms [<span>4</span>]. Diagnosis of hepatic UCD remains difficult because of a lack of specific imaging features. In our case, it was necessary to rule out the possibility of hemangioendothelioma in view of the presence of a halo sign on T2-weighted images. However, our patient had none of the hallmarks of hemangioendothelioma, such as the “capsular retraction” sign [<span>5</span>]. On dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, the corona-like enhancement of this lesion can be confused with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, the lesion lacked a capsule and the classical “wash in and wash out” dynamic enhancement pattern typical of HCC [<span>6</span>].</p><p>Of note, the corona-like enhancement and the halo sign seen in our case may also be seen in hepatocellular adenoma. However, the lesion did not show the atoll sign or signal drop out on out-of-phase imaging or uptake of a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent [<span>7</span>]. Furthermore, the lesion in our case showed a low signal in the hepatobiliary phase, which rules out focal nodular hyperplasia [<span>8, 9</span>].</p><p>The lesion in
{"title":"Primary Castleman's disease in the hepatic parenchyma: A case report and literature review","authors":"Hanjun Zhang, Mingyue Song, Mingzhan Du, Zhuxue Zhang, Weiguo Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ird3.74","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ird3.74","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A 65-year-old woman was found to have a space-occupying lesion in the parenchyma of hepatic segment IV by ultrasonography during a routine medical checkup. She had no history of viral hepatitis or any infectious diseases, and her tumor markers and routine blood and biochemical indices were normal. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-defined lesion that showed homogeneous hypointensity on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity with a halo sign on T2-weighted images (Figure 1a,b). Diffusion-weighted imaging showed homogeneous restricted diffusion (Figure 1c,d), and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging showed hyperintensity in the arterial phase with no Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in the hepatobiliary phase (Figure 1e–g). A maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) of 3.270 and a delayed SUV<sub>max</sub> of 4.887 were recorded on <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scans (Figure 2a–d). The plasma cell variant of Castleman's disease was confirmed pathologically after left hemihepatectomy. Immunohistochemical analysis showed lymphoid hyperplasia, positive immunostaining for CD markers, and a Ki-67 index of 40% (Figure 2e,f). No recurrence has been noted on annual computed tomography scans after the 6-month follow-up.</p><p>Castleman's disease, also known as angiofollicular lymph node hyperplasia and giant lymph node hyperplasia [<span>1</span>], rarely arises in the hepatic parenchyma. Clinically, Castleman's disease can be divided into unicentric (UCD) and multicentric (MCD). UCD and idiopathic MCD are classified into tumor-like lesions with B-cell predominance according to the fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumors [<span>2, 3</span>].</p><p>UCD usually presents as a localized lesion without any obvious symptoms [<span>4</span>]. Diagnosis of hepatic UCD remains difficult because of a lack of specific imaging features. In our case, it was necessary to rule out the possibility of hemangioendothelioma in view of the presence of a halo sign on T2-weighted images. However, our patient had none of the hallmarks of hemangioendothelioma, such as the “capsular retraction” sign [<span>5</span>]. On dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, the corona-like enhancement of this lesion can be confused with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, the lesion lacked a capsule and the classical “wash in and wash out” dynamic enhancement pattern typical of HCC [<span>6</span>].</p><p>Of note, the corona-like enhancement and the halo sign seen in our case may also be seen in hepatocellular adenoma. However, the lesion did not show the atoll sign or signal drop out on out-of-phase imaging or uptake of a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent [<span>7</span>]. Furthermore, the lesion in our case showed a low signal in the hepatobiliary phase, which rules out focal nodular hyperplasia [<span>8, 9</span>].</p><p>The lesion in ","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 4","pages":"422-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.74","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140700669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>As the authors of this commentary, we would like to clarify that the figures presented originated from ChatGPT 3.5. Unless specified otherwise, in all figures, questions were provided as input through its user interface and the responses generated have been illustrated in a distinct font. The human authors subsequently undertook the editing process where we edited the ChatGPT 3.5 generated responses for better clarity (in terms of text organization) [<span>1-3</span>].</p><p>ChatGPT 3.5, created by OpenAI in San Francisco, is an advanced artificial intelligence conversational tool. Operating as a large language model (LLM), it can engage in conversations across more than 90 languages. Developed through deep-learning techniques utilizing multilayered recurrent feedforward neural networks, the model has undergone training on an extensive dataset with over 175 billion parameters. This dataset comprises information from diverse internet sources, including websites, articles, fiction, and books, collected until September 2021. The architecture of ChatGPT 3.5 is based on transformers, allowing it to simultaneously process a vast amount of data. This design enables the model to grasp the context and relationships between words in input sequences, facilitating the generation of coherent and relevant responses. Notably, ChatGPT 3.5 can comprehend questions and furnish persuasive, grammatically correct answers. Moreover, it has the capability to generate code, stories, poetry, scientific abstracts, and various other types of content in different styles. It is crucial to emphasize that ChatGPT 3.5 does not merely replicate stored information. Instead, it generates the most probable next word based on probabilities acquired through reinforcement learning during its training process [<span>4-6</span>].</p><p>ChatGPT 3.5 has the potential to greatly assist radiologists in image analysis and interpretation, leveraging its deep-learning capabilities to scrutinize extensive imaging data. By presenting alternative perspectives and highlighting potential areas of concern, ChatGPT 3.5 can enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency [<span>4, 5</span>]. Furthermore, the tool can optimize workflow in radiology departments by automating repetitive tasks, such as report generation, leading to time savings for radiologists, being crucial in particular for emergency radiologists.</p><p>Indeed, recently a course called “The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Emergency Imaging AI Certificate” has been introduced by the RSNA, which signifies the importance of AI technologies including LLMs in emergency settings. Thus, we decided to explore the role that ChatGPT 3.5 can play in a specific setting of radiological emergencies, in particular in the setting of imaging of cardiothoracic emergencies [<span>7, 8</span>].</p><p>As shown in Figure 1, we first inquired ChatGPT 3.5 regarding the radiation dose in a diagnostic coronary angiogram providing also patient specifi
{"title":"Role of ChatGPT 3.5 in emergency radiology, with a focus on cardiothoracic emergencies: Proof with examples","authors":"Arosh S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige","doi":"10.1002/ird3.65","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ird3.65","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the authors of this commentary, we would like to clarify that the figures presented originated from ChatGPT 3.5. Unless specified otherwise, in all figures, questions were provided as input through its user interface and the responses generated have been illustrated in a distinct font. The human authors subsequently undertook the editing process where we edited the ChatGPT 3.5 generated responses for better clarity (in terms of text organization) [<span>1-3</span>].</p><p>ChatGPT 3.5, created by OpenAI in San Francisco, is an advanced artificial intelligence conversational tool. Operating as a large language model (LLM), it can engage in conversations across more than 90 languages. Developed through deep-learning techniques utilizing multilayered recurrent feedforward neural networks, the model has undergone training on an extensive dataset with over 175 billion parameters. This dataset comprises information from diverse internet sources, including websites, articles, fiction, and books, collected until September 2021. The architecture of ChatGPT 3.5 is based on transformers, allowing it to simultaneously process a vast amount of data. This design enables the model to grasp the context and relationships between words in input sequences, facilitating the generation of coherent and relevant responses. Notably, ChatGPT 3.5 can comprehend questions and furnish persuasive, grammatically correct answers. Moreover, it has the capability to generate code, stories, poetry, scientific abstracts, and various other types of content in different styles. It is crucial to emphasize that ChatGPT 3.5 does not merely replicate stored information. Instead, it generates the most probable next word based on probabilities acquired through reinforcement learning during its training process [<span>4-6</span>].</p><p>ChatGPT 3.5 has the potential to greatly assist radiologists in image analysis and interpretation, leveraging its deep-learning capabilities to scrutinize extensive imaging data. By presenting alternative perspectives and highlighting potential areas of concern, ChatGPT 3.5 can enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency [<span>4, 5</span>]. Furthermore, the tool can optimize workflow in radiology departments by automating repetitive tasks, such as report generation, leading to time savings for radiologists, being crucial in particular for emergency radiologists.</p><p>Indeed, recently a course called “The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Emergency Imaging AI Certificate” has been introduced by the RSNA, which signifies the importance of AI technologies including LLMs in emergency settings. Thus, we decided to explore the role that ChatGPT 3.5 can play in a specific setting of radiological emergencies, in particular in the setting of imaging of cardiothoracic emergencies [<span>7, 8</span>].</p><p>As shown in Figure 1, we first inquired ChatGPT 3.5 regarding the radiation dose in a diagnostic coronary angiogram providing also patient specifi","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 5","pages":"510-521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.65","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140716068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chanchan He, Weiqi Liu, Jing Xu, Yao Huang, Zijie Dong, You Wu, Hadi Kharrazi
In this scoping review, we evaluated the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical radiology practice and examined health professionals' perspectives regarding AI use in radiology. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidelines. We searched multiple databases and the gray literature from March 15, 2016 to December 31, 2023. Of 49 articles reviewed, 13 assessed the performance of AI in radiology clinical practice, and 36 examined the attitudes of health professionals toward the use of AI in radiology. In four separate studies, AI significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity or detection rate. Furthermore, six articles emphasized a significant reduction in case reading times with AI use. Although three studies suggested an increase in specificity with the assistance of AI, these findings did not reach statistical significance. Health professionals expressed the belief that AI would have a significant impact on radiology but would not replace radiologists in the near future. Limited knowledge of AI was observed among health professionals, who supported increased education and explicit regulations and guidelines related to AI. Overall, AI can enhance diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in clinical radiology practice. However, knowledge gaps and the concerns of health professionals should be addressed by prioritizing education and reinforcing ethical and legal regulations to facilitate the advancement of AI use in radiology. This scoping review provides evidence toward a comprehensive understanding of AI's potential in clinical radiology practice, promoting its use and stimulating further discussion on related challenges and implications.
{"title":"Efficiency, accuracy, and health professional's perspectives regarding artificial intelligence in radiology practice: A scoping review","authors":"Chanchan He, Weiqi Liu, Jing Xu, Yao Huang, Zijie Dong, You Wu, Hadi Kharrazi","doi":"10.1002/ird3.63","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.63","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this scoping review, we evaluated the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical radiology practice and examined health professionals' perspectives regarding AI use in radiology. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidelines. We searched multiple databases and the gray literature from March 15, 2016 to December 31, 2023. Of 49 articles reviewed, 13 assessed the performance of AI in radiology clinical practice, and 36 examined the attitudes of health professionals toward the use of AI in radiology. In four separate studies, AI significantly improved the diagnostic sensitivity or detection rate. Furthermore, six articles emphasized a significant reduction in case reading times with AI use. Although three studies suggested an increase in specificity with the assistance of AI, these findings did not reach statistical significance. Health professionals expressed the belief that AI would have a significant impact on radiology but would not replace radiologists in the near future. Limited knowledge of AI was observed among health professionals, who supported increased education and explicit regulations and guidelines related to AI. Overall, AI can enhance diagnostic efficiency and accuracy in clinical radiology practice. However, knowledge gaps and the concerns of health professionals should be addressed by prioritizing education and reinforcing ethical and legal regulations to facilitate the advancement of AI use in radiology. This scoping review provides evidence toward a comprehensive understanding of AI's potential in clinical radiology practice, promoting its use and stimulating further discussion on related challenges and implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"156-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.63","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140633816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Claudia Chambers, Broc Chitwood, Charles J. Smith, Yubin Miao
Optimal therapeutic and diagnostic efficacy is essential for healthcare's global mission of advancing oncologic drug development. Accurate diagnosis and detection are crucial prerequisites for effective risk stratification and personalized patient care in clinical oncology. A paradigm shift is emerging with the promise of multi-receptor-targeting compounds. While existing detection and staging methods have demonstrated some success, the traditional approach of monotherapy is being reevaluated to enhance therapeutic effectiveness. Heterodimeric site-specific agents are a versatile solution by targeting two distinct biomarkers with a single theranostic agent. This review describes the innovation of dual-targeting compounds, examining their design strategies, therapeutic implications, and the promising path they present for addressing complex diseases.
{"title":"Elevating theranostics: The emergence and promise of radiopharmaceutical cell-targeting heterodimers in human cancers","authors":"Claudia Chambers, Broc Chitwood, Charles J. Smith, Yubin Miao","doi":"10.1002/ird3.62","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.62","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Optimal therapeutic and diagnostic efficacy is essential for healthcare's global mission of advancing oncologic drug development. Accurate diagnosis and detection are crucial prerequisites for effective risk stratification and personalized patient care in clinical oncology. A paradigm shift is emerging with the promise of multi-receptor-targeting compounds. While existing detection and staging methods have demonstrated some success, the traditional approach of monotherapy is being reevaluated to enhance therapeutic effectiveness. Heterodimeric site-specific agents are a versatile solution by targeting two distinct biomarkers with a single theranostic agent. This review describes the innovation of dual-targeting compounds, examining their design strategies, therapeutic implications, and the promising path they present for addressing complex diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"128-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.62","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140633815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zeliu Du, Chuanqiang Lan, Lin Shen, Zhifeng Tian, Hongfei Hu, Jie Mei, Ye Feng, Mengqian Zhai, Junchao Yu, Kan Liu, Jiansong Ji, Chenying Lu
Radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) is a heterogeneous, delayed, and potentially fatal adverse reaction to radiation that can damage all structures of the heart, including the pericardium, myocardium, coronary arteries, valves, and conduction system, leading to a series of diseases. Acute and chronic disease processes play a role in the development of RIHD, the onset times of which range from months to decades. However, the clinical manifestations of RIHD are usually insidious, overlap with several other diseases, and lack specificity. Cardiovascular imaging is essential for early diagnosis, follow-up, and outcome assessment in patients with RIHD. This review first describes the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of RIHD before providing an overview of the practical approaches and research advances in multimodal cardiovascular imaging in patients with RIHD, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and nuclear medicine, and cardiac computed tomography (CT). Then, the value of new cardiac imaging assessments for the early diagnosis of RIHD is described, particularly with relation to speckle-tracking echocardiography, extracellular volume fraction assessment as a quantitative CMR technique, CMR myocardial strain assessment, positron emission tomography-CT myocardial perfusion imaging, CT-ECV, and CT strain assessment, amongst others. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of each screening technique are compared with the aim of better guiding the follow-up and diagnosis of subclinical RIHD and preventing cardiovascular events.
{"title":"Advances in multimodality imaging and the application of new cardiac imaging technologies for radiation-induced heart disease","authors":"Zeliu Du, Chuanqiang Lan, Lin Shen, Zhifeng Tian, Hongfei Hu, Jie Mei, Ye Feng, Mengqian Zhai, Junchao Yu, Kan Liu, Jiansong Ji, Chenying Lu","doi":"10.1002/ird3.72","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ird3.72","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) is a heterogeneous, delayed, and potentially fatal adverse reaction to radiation that can damage all structures of the heart, including the pericardium, myocardium, coronary arteries, valves, and conduction system, leading to a series of diseases. Acute and chronic disease processes play a role in the development of RIHD, the onset times of which range from months to decades. However, the clinical manifestations of RIHD are usually insidious, overlap with several other diseases, and lack specificity. Cardiovascular imaging is essential for early diagnosis, follow-up, and outcome assessment in patients with RIHD. This review first describes the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of RIHD before providing an overview of the practical approaches and research advances in multimodal cardiovascular imaging in patients with RIHD, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and nuclear medicine, and cardiac computed tomography (CT). Then, the value of new cardiac imaging assessments for the early diagnosis of RIHD is described, particularly with relation to speckle-tracking echocardiography, extracellular volume fraction assessment as a quantitative CMR technique, CMR myocardial strain assessment, positron emission tomography-CT myocardial perfusion imaging, CT-ECV, and CT strain assessment, amongst others. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of each screening technique are compared with the aim of better guiding the follow-up and diagnosis of subclinical RIHD and preventing cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 3","pages":"285-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.72","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140739520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The integration of technology in medicine, particularly in the field of radiology, has led to significant advancements in patient care and diagnosis. While this digital transformation of healthcare has brought many benefits, it has also exposed radiological systems and sensitive patient data to unprecedented cybersecurity threats. This article aims to highlight the current cyberattack landscape, trends, and benefits of ethical hacking, which could be employed to identify vulnerabilities and improve cybersecurity defenses.
Global cyberattacks have been exponentially increasing on an annual basis. Focusing on the global healthcare sector, the number of attacks had alarmingly increased by 69% within the space of a year (from 2021 to 2022) [1]. Up to 250 million individuals have been affected by healthcare data breaches from 2005 to 2019, of which, 157 million individuals have been affected in the last 5 years [2]. The financial impact has also been significant. According to an IBM report, the average cost of a single healthcare data breach affecting an average of 26,000 records would cost up to $15 million [2]. The breach of Anthem, a medical insurance company in the USA in 2015, exposed the medical records of 78 million individuals and resulted in a $115 million settlement [3].
In Australia, 22% of businesses have experienced a cybersecurity attack in FY2021/2022, and the number of attacks has doubled since FY2019/2020 [4]. A total of 16% of the cyberattacks were scams/fraud, 5% were malicious software, and 3% were related to unauthorized access [4]. In FY2021/2022, these attacks were associated with 18% service downtime and 17% loss of staff productivity [4]. Notable events in Australian healthcare that occurred within the past year (2022) include the Australian Red Cross from a cyberattack on the International Committee of Red Cross servers, CTARS client case management system for vulnerable children, Medlab Pathology attack impacting almost 230,000 individuals, Medibank attack impacting 9.7 million customers and private hospital provider, Mater [1]. The impacts of cyberattacks on healthcare systems include the breach of sensitive patient data, disruption of services, electronic system downtime, cancellation of scheduled medical appointments, and ambulance diversions.
Within radiology, Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) and Radiology Information Systems (RIS) are used to help streamline the process of retrieving, storing, and sharing of medical images that are saved in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format (international communication standard). Breach of these systems can result in the theft of sensitive patient data/diagnoses and an increased risk of identity theft and ransom. Manipulation of medical images is also an emerging concern, which could result in dire consequences in
{"title":"Mitigating cybersecurity risks in radiology—is it time to unmask vulnerabilities and fortify cyber defenses with ethical hacking?","authors":"Reuben Schmidt, Lincoln J. Lim","doi":"10.1002/ird3.71","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ird3.71","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integration of technology in medicine, particularly in the field of radiology, has led to significant advancements in patient care and diagnosis. While this digital transformation of healthcare has brought many benefits, it has also exposed radiological systems and sensitive patient data to unprecedented cybersecurity threats. This article aims to highlight the current cyberattack landscape, trends, and benefits of ethical hacking, which could be employed to identify vulnerabilities and improve cybersecurity defenses.</p><p>Global cyberattacks have been exponentially increasing on an annual basis. Focusing on the global healthcare sector, the number of attacks had alarmingly increased by 69% within the space of a year (from 2021 to 2022) [<span>1</span>]. Up to 250 million individuals have been affected by healthcare data breaches from 2005 to 2019, of which, 157 million individuals have been affected in the last 5 years [<span>2</span>]. The financial impact has also been significant. According to an IBM report, the average cost of a single healthcare data breach affecting an average of 26,000 records would cost up to $15 million [<span>2</span>]. The breach of Anthem, a medical insurance company in the USA in 2015, exposed the medical records of 78 million individuals and resulted in a $115 million settlement [<span>3</span>].</p><p>In Australia, 22% of businesses have experienced a cybersecurity attack in FY2021/2022, and the number of attacks has doubled since FY2019/2020 [<span>4</span>]. A total of 16% of the cyberattacks were scams/fraud, 5% were malicious software, and 3% were related to unauthorized access [<span>4</span>]. In FY2021/2022, these attacks were associated with 18% service downtime and 17% loss of staff productivity [<span>4</span>]. Notable events in Australian healthcare that occurred within the past year (2022) include the Australian Red Cross from a cyberattack on the International Committee of Red Cross servers, CTARS client case management system for vulnerable children, Medlab Pathology attack impacting almost 230,000 individuals, Medibank attack impacting 9.7 million customers and private hospital provider, Mater [<span>1</span>]. The impacts of cyberattacks on healthcare systems include the breach of sensitive patient data, disruption of services, electronic system downtime, cancellation of scheduled medical appointments, and ambulance diversions.</p><p>Within radiology, Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) and Radiology Information Systems (RIS) are used to help streamline the process of retrieving, storing, and sharing of medical images that are saved in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format (international communication standard). Breach of these systems can result in the theft of sensitive patient data/diagnoses and an increased risk of identity theft and ransom. Manipulation of medical images is also an emerging concern, which could result in dire consequences in ","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"216-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.71","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140367763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Monoamine oxidases (MAOs) are a class of flavin enzymes that are mainly present in the outer membrane of mitochondria and play a crucial role in maintaining the homeostasis of monoamine neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. Furthermore, expression of MAOs is associated with the functions of peripheral organs. Dysfunction of MAOs is relevant in a variety of diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, heart failure, metabolic disorders, and cancers. Monoamine oxidases have two isoenzymes, namely, monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B). Therefore, the development of reliable and specific methods to detect these two isoenzymes is of great significance for the in-depth understanding of their functions in biological systems, and for further promoting the clinical diagnosis and treatment of MAO-related diseases. This review mainly focuses on the advances in small molecular probes for the specific imaging of MAO-A and MAO-B, including radiolabeled probes, fluorescent probes, and a 19F magnetic resonance imaging probe. In addition, applications of these probes for detecting MAO expression levels in cells, tissues, animal models, and patients are described. Finally, the challenges and perspectives of developing novel MAO imaging probes are also highlighted.
单胺氧化酶(MAOs)是一类主要存在于线粒体外膜的黄素酶,在维持中枢神经系统中单胺神经递质的平衡方面发挥着至关重要的作用。此外,MAOs 的表达还与外周器官的功能有关。MAOs 的功能障碍与多种疾病有关,如神经退行性疾病、心力衰竭、代谢紊乱和癌症。单胺氧化酶有两种同工酶,即单胺氧化酶 A(MAO-A)和单胺氧化酶 B(MAO-B)。因此,开发可靠、特异的方法检测这两种同工酶,对于深入了解它们在生物系统中的功能,进一步促进 MAO 相关疾病的临床诊断和治疗具有重要意义。本综述主要关注用于 MAO-A 和 MAO-B 特异性成像的小分子探针的研究进展,包括放射性标记探针、荧光探针和 19F 磁共振成像探针。此外,还介绍了这些探针在检测细胞、组织、动物模型和患者体内 MAO 表达水平方面的应用。最后,还强调了开发新型 MAO 成像探针所面临的挑战和前景。
{"title":"Small molecule probes for the specific imaging of monoamine oxidase A and monoamine oxidase B","authors":"Yi Fang, Zhengping Chen, Min Yang","doi":"10.1002/ird3.70","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ird3.70","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Monoamine oxidases (MAOs) are a class of flavin enzymes that are mainly present in the outer membrane of mitochondria and play a crucial role in maintaining the homeostasis of monoamine neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. Furthermore, expression of MAOs is associated with the functions of peripheral organs. Dysfunction of MAOs is relevant in a variety of diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, heart failure, metabolic disorders, and cancers. Monoamine oxidases have two isoenzymes, namely, monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B). Therefore, the development of reliable and specific methods to detect these two isoenzymes is of great significance for the in-depth understanding of their functions in biological systems, and for further promoting the clinical diagnosis and treatment of MAO-related diseases. This review mainly focuses on the advances in small molecular probes for the specific imaging of MAO-A and MAO-B, including radiolabeled probes, fluorescent probes, and a <sup>19</sup>F magnetic resonance imaging probe. In addition, applications of these probes for detecting MAO expression levels in cells, tissues, animal models, and patients are described. Finally, the challenges and perspectives of developing novel MAO imaging probes are also highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"191-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.70","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140373933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guo J, Du M, Chen Z, Chen X, Yuan Z. A review of biomodified or biomimetic polymer dots for targeted fluorescent imaging and disease treatments. iRADIOLOGY. 2023; 1(3): 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.26
In “CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT” section, the text “The authors declare no conflicts of interest.” was incorrect. This should have read: “The authors declare no conflicts of interest. If authors are from the editorial board of iRADIOLOGY, they will be excluded from the peer-review process and all editorial decisions related to the publication of this article.”
We apologize for this error.
Guo J, Du M, Chen Z, Chen X, Yuan Z. A review of biomodified or biomimetic polymer dots for targeted fluorescent imaging and disease treatments. iRADIOLOGY.2023; 1(3):209-224。https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.26In "利益冲突声明 "部分,"作者声明无利益冲突 "有误。应改为"作者声明无利益冲突。如果作者来自《iRADIOLOGY》编辑部,他们将被排除在同行评审过程和所有与本文发表相关的编辑决策之外。"我们对这一错误表示歉意。
{"title":"Correction to “A review of biomodified or biomimetic polymer dots for targeted fluorescent imaging and disease treatments”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ird3.67","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ird3.67","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Guo J, Du M, Chen Z, Chen X, Yuan Z. A review of biomodified or biomimetic polymer dots for targeted fluorescent imaging and disease treatments. <i>iRADIOLOGY</i>. 2023; 1(3): 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.26</p><p>In “<b>CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT</b>” section, the text “The authors declare no conflicts of interest.” was incorrect. This should have read: “The authors declare no conflicts of interest. If authors are from the editorial board of <i>iRADIOLOGY</i>, they will be excluded from the peer-review process and all editorial decisions related to the publication of this article.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 2","pages":"225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.67","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140247877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}