Pub Date : 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00324-0
Milo Gatti, Pierantonio Grimaldi, Matteo Rinaldi, Antonio Siniscalchi, Tommaso Tonetti, Pierluigi Viale, Federico Pea
Objective: To validate a predictive risk score of early aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target non-attainment with continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in a retrospective cohort of critically ill patients having documented Gram-negative infections.
Methods: Critically ill adult patients receiving treatment of documented Gram-negative infections with CI piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem and undergoing first real-time beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) instance within 72 h from starting standard dosing regimens were retrospectively included. A receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed by using the proposed predictive score as the test variable and early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment as the state variable. Area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval were calculated. The identified cut-off risk values were used for stratifying patients and assessing the impact on clinical/microbiological outcome in each sub-cohort of patients receiving targeted monotherapy.
Results: Overall, 209 and 203 patients receiving CI piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were included, respectively. Early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment was reported in 33 cases (15.8%) receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and in 8 (3.9%) of those treated with meropenem. A score threshold ≥ 2 points for piperacillin-tazobactam (AUC 0.81; 95% CI 0.75-0.86; p < 0.0001) and ≥ 3 points for patients treated with meropenem (AUC 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment. Patients achieving the cut-off predictive score showed a significant higher microbiological failure rate in both piperacillin-tazobactam (56.3% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.044) and meropenem sub-cohorts (50.0% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.028).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the proposed predictive cut-off risk score may represent a valuable tool for identifying promptly critically ill patients at high risk of early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment with CI piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for whom a more intensified CI dosing regimens should be promptly applied bedside.
目的:验证持续输注(CI)哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或美罗培南未达到早期侵袭性药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标的预测风险评分。方法:回顾性分析采用CI哌拉西林-他唑巴坦或美罗培南治疗革兰氏阴性感染的危重成人患者,并在开始标准给药方案后72小时内进行第一次实时β -内酰胺治疗药物监测(TDM)。以提出的预测评分为检验变量,以未达到早期侵袭性PK/PD目标为状态变量,进行接受工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。计算曲线下面积(AUC)和95%置信区间。确定的截止风险值用于对患者进行分层,并评估接受靶向单药治疗的每个亚队列患者对临床/微生物预后的影响。结果:总体上,分别纳入209例和203例接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和美罗培南CI治疗的患者。哌拉西林-他唑巴坦组33例(15.8%)未达到早期侵袭性PK/PD目标,美罗培南组8例(3.9%)未达到。哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的评分阈值≥2分(AUC 0.81; 95% CI 0.75-0.86; p)结论:我们的研究结果表明,所提出的预测截止风险评分可能是一种有价值的工具,可用于识别那些使用哌拉西林-他唑巴坦或美罗培南的危重患者,这些患者存在早期恶性PK/PD目标未达到的高风险,应立即在床边应用更强化的CI给药方案。
{"title":"Validation of a predictive risk score of aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment with continuous infusion piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in critically ill patients having documented Gram-negative infections.","authors":"Milo Gatti, Pierantonio Grimaldi, Matteo Rinaldi, Antonio Siniscalchi, Tommaso Tonetti, Pierluigi Viale, Federico Pea","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00324-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00324-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a predictive risk score of early aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target non-attainment with continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in a retrospective cohort of critically ill patients having documented Gram-negative infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Critically ill adult patients receiving treatment of documented Gram-negative infections with CI piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem and undergoing first real-time beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) instance within 72 h from starting standard dosing regimens were retrospectively included. A receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed by using the proposed predictive score as the test variable and early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment as the state variable. Area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval were calculated. The identified cut-off risk values were used for stratifying patients and assessing the impact on clinical/microbiological outcome in each sub-cohort of patients receiving targeted monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 209 and 203 patients receiving CI piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were included, respectively. Early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment was reported in 33 cases (15.8%) receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and in 8 (3.9%) of those treated with meropenem. A score threshold ≥ 2 points for piperacillin-tazobactam (AUC 0.81; 95% CI 0.75-0.86; p < 0.0001) and ≥ 3 points for patients treated with meropenem (AUC 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment. Patients achieving the cut-off predictive score showed a significant higher microbiological failure rate in both piperacillin-tazobactam (56.3% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.044) and meropenem sub-cohorts (50.0% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the proposed predictive cut-off risk score may represent a valuable tool for identifying promptly critically ill patients at high risk of early aggressive PK/PD target non-attainment with CI piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for whom a more intensified CI dosing regimens should be promptly applied bedside.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12797542/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145672468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-03DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00302-6
Antonio Coviello, Dario Cirillo, Alessio Bernasconi, Andrea Uriel de Siena, Ezio Spasari, Maria Silvia Barone, Ilaria Piccione, Giorgio Ranieri, Andrea Tognù, Giuseppe Servillo, Carmine Iacovazzo
Background: Proximal Femur Fractures (PFF) are common among the elderly and can lead to significant disability. Anesthesiological management typically involves Spinal Anesthesia (SA) or Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNBs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SA and PNBs in elderly patients undergoing surgical fixation of PFF. The primary outcome was the comprehensive assessment of intraoperative hemodynamic instability.
Methods: A monocentric, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blind randomized study was conducted at the University 'Federico II' Hospital of Naples from December 2023 to June 2024. Patients diagnosed with PFF and scheduled for surgery were randomized to receive either Selective Spinal Anesthesia (SSA) (hypobaric bupivacaine 0.5% 7.5 mg and sufentanil 5 µg) or PNBs (femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, and sciatic nerve blocks). The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of locoregional procedures by analyzing intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, as well as the effectiveness of analgesia.
Results: The PNB group showed a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability (16.7% vs 43.4%, p = 0.048) compared to the SSA group. Bradycardia was also less frequent in the PNB group (10% vs 33.3%, p = 0.028). Although repeated hypotensive episodes occurred in both groups, mean MAP, TWA-MAP and TWA-hypotension remained within safe limits, with brief episode durations and no need for pharmacological intervention. Mobilization was slower in the PNB group; however, these patients experienced a shorter hospital stay. No differences were observed in the need for analgesic rescue doses or in the incidence of postoperative complications, including PONV, DVT, MI, or neurological injury. Pain scores were slightly higher in the SSA group at 6 and 24 h, though the differences were not clinically meaningful. Both groups showed significant increases in NRS and PAINAD scores over time compared to baseline. Motor and sensory block onset was slower and duration longer in the PNB group, while SSA produced a faster onset and earlier resolution. Surgeon satisfaction, as well as estimated and actual surgical durations, were comparable between groups.
Conclusions: PNBs offer an alternative to SSA by providing better intraoperative hemodynamic stability, a lower incidence of postoperative delirium, and improved postoperative analgesia.
Trial registration: This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number (NCT06155903), registered July, 2, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155903.
背景:股骨近端骨折(PFF)在老年人中很常见,可导致严重的残疾。麻醉治疗通常包括脊髓麻醉(SA)或周围神经阻滞(pnb)。本研究旨在比较SA和PNBs在老年PFF手术固定患者中的疗效和安全性。主要结果是术中血流动力学不稳定性的综合评估。方法:2023年12月至2024年6月,在那不勒斯大学“费德里科二世”医院进行了一项单中心、患者、外科医生和评估员盲随机研究。诊断为PFF并计划手术的患者随机接受选择性脊髓麻醉(SSA)(低压布比卡因0.5% 7.5 mg和舒芬太尼5µg)或pnb(股神经、股外侧皮神经、闭孔神经和坐骨神经阻滞)。该研究通过分析术中和术后不良事件以及镇痛的有效性来评估局部手术的有效性和安全性。结果:PNB组术中血流动力学不稳定发生率明显低于SSA组(16.7% vs 43.4%, p = 0.048)。PNB组心动过缓的发生率也较低(10% vs 33.3%, p = 0.028)。尽管两组患者均出现多次低血压发作,但平均MAP、TWA-MAP和twa -低血压仍在安全范围内,发作持续时间短,不需要药物干预。PNB组的动员较慢;然而,这些患者的住院时间较短。在镇痛救援剂量的需要或术后并发症的发生率方面,包括PONV、DVT、MI或神经损伤,没有观察到差异。SSA组疼痛评分在6和24 h时略高,但差异无临床意义。与基线相比,两组的NRS和PAINAD评分均随时间显著增加。PNB组运动和感觉阻滞发作较慢,持续时间较长,而SSA组发作较快,消退较早。外科医生的满意度,以及估计和实际手术时间在两组之间具有可比性。结论:pnb通过提供更好的术中血流动力学稳定性、更低的术后谵妄发生率和更好的术后镇痛,为SSA提供了一种替代方案。试验注册:本研究已在Clinicaltrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT06155903,注册日期为2023年7月2日,网址为https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155903。
{"title":"Peripheral nerve blocks vs selective spinal anesthesia in patients with femur fracture: a patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded randomized controlled study.","authors":"Antonio Coviello, Dario Cirillo, Alessio Bernasconi, Andrea Uriel de Siena, Ezio Spasari, Maria Silvia Barone, Ilaria Piccione, Giorgio Ranieri, Andrea Tognù, Giuseppe Servillo, Carmine Iacovazzo","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00302-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00302-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal Femur Fractures (PFF) are common among the elderly and can lead to significant disability. Anesthesiological management typically involves Spinal Anesthesia (SA) or Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNBs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SA and PNBs in elderly patients undergoing surgical fixation of PFF. The primary outcome was the comprehensive assessment of intraoperative hemodynamic instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A monocentric, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blind randomized study was conducted at the University 'Federico II' Hospital of Naples from December 2023 to June 2024. Patients diagnosed with PFF and scheduled for surgery were randomized to receive either Selective Spinal Anesthesia (SSA) (hypobaric bupivacaine 0.5% 7.5 mg and sufentanil 5 µg) or PNBs (femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, and sciatic nerve blocks). The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of locoregional procedures by analyzing intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, as well as the effectiveness of analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PNB group showed a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability (16.7% vs 43.4%, p = 0.048) compared to the SSA group. Bradycardia was also less frequent in the PNB group (10% vs 33.3%, p = 0.028). Although repeated hypotensive episodes occurred in both groups, mean MAP, TWA-MAP and TWA-hypotension remained within safe limits, with brief episode durations and no need for pharmacological intervention. Mobilization was slower in the PNB group; however, these patients experienced a shorter hospital stay. No differences were observed in the need for analgesic rescue doses or in the incidence of postoperative complications, including PONV, DVT, MI, or neurological injury. Pain scores were slightly higher in the SSA group at 6 and 24 h, though the differences were not clinically meaningful. Both groups showed significant increases in NRS and PAINAD scores over time compared to baseline. Motor and sensory block onset was slower and duration longer in the PNB group, while SSA produced a faster onset and earlier resolution. Surgeon satisfaction, as well as estimated and actual surgical durations, were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PNBs offer an alternative to SSA by providing better intraoperative hemodynamic stability, a lower incidence of postoperative delirium, and improved postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number (NCT06155903), registered July, 2, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155903.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12676886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145672939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00299-y
Andrea Cortegiani, Gennaro De Pascale, Giulia De Angelis, Marco Falcone, Arianna Ferrini, Arianna Forniti, Milo Gatti, Massimo Girardis, Giacomo Grasselli, Federico Pea, Matteo Rinaldi, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Pierluigi Viale, Antonino Giarratano
Critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units are at high risk of developing invasive candidiasis (IC). Delay in diagnosis and suboptimal management contribute to high mortality rates, highlighting the need for an appropriate and patient-tailored approach. The Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) convened a multidisciplinary panel, involving intensivists, infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, and pharmacologists, to develop consensus-based statements on the diagnosis and management of IC in critically ill patients. The panel formulated 13 statements addressing key aspects of care, including identification of major risk factors for IC, the role of biomarkers to support therapeutic decision-making, and optimal selection of antifungal agents based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations and site-specific characteristics. The document also provides guidance on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize antifungal efficacy. Special attention is given to infections in specific anatomical sites, such as the peritoneal cavity, central nervous system, eye, and biofilm-associated infections, where drug penetration and activity must be carefully considered. This multidisciplinary statement offers a practical framework aimed at improving clinical decision-making for the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients.
{"title":"Diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients: SIAARTI multidisciplinary statement.","authors":"Andrea Cortegiani, Gennaro De Pascale, Giulia De Angelis, Marco Falcone, Arianna Ferrini, Arianna Forniti, Milo Gatti, Massimo Girardis, Giacomo Grasselli, Federico Pea, Matteo Rinaldi, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Pierluigi Viale, Antonino Giarratano","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00299-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00299-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units are at high risk of developing invasive candidiasis (IC). Delay in diagnosis and suboptimal management contribute to high mortality rates, highlighting the need for an appropriate and patient-tailored approach. The Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) convened a multidisciplinary panel, involving intensivists, infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, and pharmacologists, to develop consensus-based statements on the diagnosis and management of IC in critically ill patients. The panel formulated 13 statements addressing key aspects of care, including identification of major risk factors for IC, the role of biomarkers to support therapeutic decision-making, and optimal selection of antifungal agents based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations and site-specific characteristics. The document also provides guidance on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to optimize antifungal efficacy. Special attention is given to infections in specific anatomical sites, such as the peritoneal cavity, central nervous system, eye, and biofilm-associated infections, where drug penetration and activity must be carefully considered. This multidisciplinary statement offers a practical framework aimed at improving clinical decision-making for the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12777504/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00316-0
Marwan Bouras, Nicolas Beaulieu, Tomas Hayg Torkomyan, Sarah O'Connor, Olivier Costerousse, François Lauzier, Ryan Zarychanski, Michael Verret, Shane W English, Bourke Tillmann, Ian Ball, Marat Slessarev, Alexis F Turgeon
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Beyond the primary insult, excessive sympathetic activation contributes to secondary brain injury and poor outcomes. Beta-blockers may attenuate this hyperadrenergic surge and provide neuroprotective benefits, but their efficacy in improving long-term functional recovery remains uncertain.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating beta-blockers in adults with acute TBI. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs comparing beta-blockers with placebo, usual care, or non-adrenergic comparators. Our primary outcome was long-term functional outcome, assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or its Extended version (GOS-E). Secondary outcomes included mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and adverse events.
Results: Seven RCTs (n = 559) met inclusion; six (n = 445) contributed data to meta-analyses. Only two trials (n = 259) reported functional outcomes. Beta-blockers did not significantly reduce the risk of unfavorable neurological outcome (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.57-1.15; very low certainty). In contrast, beta-blocker therapy was associated with a reduction in mortality (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39-0.82; 6 trials, n = 440; low certainty) and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (-1.58 days; 95% CI -2.91 to -0.26; 2 trials, n = 85; low certainty). No effect was observed on ICU or hospital stay. Adverse event reporting was sparse, but no consistent safety concerns were identified.
Conclusions: In adults with acute TBI, beta-blockers did not decrease unfavorable long-term neurological outcomes but were associated with lower mortality and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. Given the small number of trials and very low certainty of evidence, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn, and routine use cannot be recommended. A large, well-designed RCT is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers in this population.
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)仍然是世界范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。除了初级损伤外,过度的交感神经激活还会导致继发性脑损伤和不良预后。-受体阻滞剂可能会减弱这种肾上腺素能激增并提供神经保护作用,但其在改善长期功能恢复方面的功效仍不确定。方法:我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估了成人急性TBI患者的β受体阻滞剂。我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov,查找比较β受体阻滞剂与安慰剂、常规治疗或非肾上腺素能比较剂的随机对照试验。我们的主要结局是长期功能结局,用格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)或其扩展版(GOS- e)进行评估。次要结局包括死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间、机械通气持续时间和不良事件。结果:7项rct (n = 559)符合纳入标准;6例(n = 445)为meta分析提供了数据。只有两项试验(n = 259)报告了功能结局。受体阻滞剂并没有显著降低不良神经预后的风险(RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.57-1.15;非常低的确定性)。相反,受体阻滞剂治疗与死亡率降低(RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39-0.82; 6项试验,n = 440;低确定性)和更短的机械通气持续时间(-1.58天;95% CI -2.91至-0.26;2项试验,n = 85;低确定性)相关。对ICU和住院时间没有影响。不良事件报告很少,但没有一致的安全问题。结论:在成人急性TBI患者中,β受体阻滞剂并没有减少不良的长期神经系统预后,但与较低的死亡率和较短的机械通气时间相关。由于试验数量少,证据的确定性非常低,因此无法得出明确的结论,也不建议常规使用。需要一个大型的、设计良好的随机对照试验来确定β受体阻滞剂在这一人群中的有效性和安全性。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024565361。
{"title":"Beta-blockers in adults with acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Marwan Bouras, Nicolas Beaulieu, Tomas Hayg Torkomyan, Sarah O'Connor, Olivier Costerousse, François Lauzier, Ryan Zarychanski, Michael Verret, Shane W English, Bourke Tillmann, Ian Ball, Marat Slessarev, Alexis F Turgeon","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00316-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00316-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Beyond the primary insult, excessive sympathetic activation contributes to secondary brain injury and poor outcomes. Beta-blockers may attenuate this hyperadrenergic surge and provide neuroprotective benefits, but their efficacy in improving long-term functional recovery remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating beta-blockers in adults with acute TBI. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs comparing beta-blockers with placebo, usual care, or non-adrenergic comparators. Our primary outcome was long-term functional outcome, assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or its Extended version (GOS-E). Secondary outcomes included mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs (n = 559) met inclusion; six (n = 445) contributed data to meta-analyses. Only two trials (n = 259) reported functional outcomes. Beta-blockers did not significantly reduce the risk of unfavorable neurological outcome (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.57-1.15; very low certainty). In contrast, beta-blocker therapy was associated with a reduction in mortality (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39-0.82; 6 trials, n = 440; low certainty) and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (-1.58 days; 95% CI -2.91 to -0.26; 2 trials, n = 85; low certainty). No effect was observed on ICU or hospital stay. Adverse event reporting was sparse, but no consistent safety concerns were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adults with acute TBI, beta-blockers did not decrease unfavorable long-term neurological outcomes but were associated with lower mortality and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. Given the small number of trials and very low certainty of evidence, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn, and routine use cannot be recommended. A large, well-designed RCT is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers in this population.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024565361.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":" ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12781557/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145662774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00311-5
Angelo Guglielmi, Francesca Graziano, Alessia Vargiolu, Maria Amigoni, Angela Berselli, Luca Cabrini, Arturo Chieregato, Antonio Dell'Acqua, Giacomo Dell'Avanzo, Paola Fassini, Elena Galassini, Marco Gemma, Elena Grappa, Paolo Gritti, Carolina Iaquaniello, Paolo Mangili, Giovanni Maria Mazza, Giovanni Mistraletti, Stefano Muttini, Maia Nguyen, Fabrizio Ortolano, Michele Pagani, Cristina Panzeri, Simone Piva, Lorenzo Simone Pressato, Frank Rasulo, Fabio Sangalli, Federico Villa, Andrea Viscone, Simone Maria Zerbi, Tommaso Zoerle, Giuseppe Citerio
Background: Despite serving over 10 million inhabitants, neurocritical care across the Lombardy region of Italy (from here on Lombardia) remains fragmented and insufficiently mapped, underscoring the need for a structured regional network. This study aimed to evaluate current resources and explore pathways for integration and development.
Methods: In 2024, along with other initiatives, a web-based survey was performed, focusing on hospitals with neurosurgical capabilities and intensive care units (ICUs) to identify variations in service delivery and adherence to evidence-based practices, guiding quality improvement across centers.
Results: Responses were obtained from 19 acute care hospitals with neurosurgical facilities within the regional health service. Ten hospitals (52%) host dedicated neuro-ICUs, including five (26%) that also admit pediatric patients, accounting for a total of 85 beds. In the remaining nine hospitals (47%), neurocritical care is delivered within general ICUs without dedicated beds. Continuous in-house neurosurgical coverage is available in 9 centers (47%), while the others rely on a 24/7 on-call model. All 19 centers (100%) report 24/7 availability of neurologists and neuroradiologists, either in-house or on call. However, access to advanced diagnostic and monitoring technologies remains heterogeneous across sites. Participating centers identified a clear need for standardized protocols and clinical pathways to improve care quality and support evidence-based practices. Priority areas defined by the clinicians include neuroprognostication, end-of-life care and donor management, pediatric neurocritical care, neurointerventional procedures, management of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage, and post-discharge follow-up. To address these gaps, several multidisciplinary working groups have been established.
Conclusion: Neurocritical care in Lombardia remains highly heterogeneous, with bed availability significantly below international benchmarks. The establishment of a regional network seeks to enhance the quality and equity of care for neurocritical patients, while also fostering clinical research, data sharing, and multidisciplinary collaboration across centers.
{"title":"The LINK-Lombardia NeuroIntensive care Network.","authors":"Angelo Guglielmi, Francesca Graziano, Alessia Vargiolu, Maria Amigoni, Angela Berselli, Luca Cabrini, Arturo Chieregato, Antonio Dell'Acqua, Giacomo Dell'Avanzo, Paola Fassini, Elena Galassini, Marco Gemma, Elena Grappa, Paolo Gritti, Carolina Iaquaniello, Paolo Mangili, Giovanni Maria Mazza, Giovanni Mistraletti, Stefano Muttini, Maia Nguyen, Fabrizio Ortolano, Michele Pagani, Cristina Panzeri, Simone Piva, Lorenzo Simone Pressato, Frank Rasulo, Fabio Sangalli, Federico Villa, Andrea Viscone, Simone Maria Zerbi, Tommaso Zoerle, Giuseppe Citerio","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00311-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00311-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite serving over 10 million inhabitants, neurocritical care across the Lombardy region of Italy (from here on Lombardia) remains fragmented and insufficiently mapped, underscoring the need for a structured regional network. This study aimed to evaluate current resources and explore pathways for integration and development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2024, along with other initiatives, a web-based survey was performed, focusing on hospitals with neurosurgical capabilities and intensive care units (ICUs) to identify variations in service delivery and adherence to evidence-based practices, guiding quality improvement across centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 19 acute care hospitals with neurosurgical facilities within the regional health service. Ten hospitals (52%) host dedicated neuro-ICUs, including five (26%) that also admit pediatric patients, accounting for a total of 85 beds. In the remaining nine hospitals (47%), neurocritical care is delivered within general ICUs without dedicated beds. Continuous in-house neurosurgical coverage is available in 9 centers (47%), while the others rely on a 24/7 on-call model. All 19 centers (100%) report 24/7 availability of neurologists and neuroradiologists, either in-house or on call. However, access to advanced diagnostic and monitoring technologies remains heterogeneous across sites. Participating centers identified a clear need for standardized protocols and clinical pathways to improve care quality and support evidence-based practices. Priority areas defined by the clinicians include neuroprognostication, end-of-life care and donor management, pediatric neurocritical care, neurointerventional procedures, management of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage, and post-discharge follow-up. To address these gaps, several multidisciplinary working groups have been established.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neurocritical care in Lombardia remains highly heterogeneous, with bed availability significantly below international benchmarks. The establishment of a regional network seeks to enhance the quality and equity of care for neurocritical patients, while also fostering clinical research, data sharing, and multidisciplinary collaboration across centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12661755/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-21DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00301-7
Federica De Min, Maria Assunta Donato, Elisa Raimondo, Alessandro Ivan De Martino, Alessia Bresil, Alessandra Agnese Grossi, Martina Baiardo Redaelli, Paolo Severgnini, Luca Cabrini
Background: A wide gap exists between the number of patients awaiting organ transplantation and the availability of donor organs. For most vital organs, no artificial substitutes are available, resulting in the death of approximately 3-4% of patients on transplant waiting lists. Deceased organ donation occurs through one of two pathways: donation after brain death (DBD) or after controlled circulatory death (cDCD). In the absence of documented consent during the patient's lifetime, many countries rely on family members to make the decision, placing an emotional burden on them during a time of acute grief. Data on family attitudes toward organ donation, particularly in relation to the mode of death (DBD vs. cDCD), remains limited. This study aimed to examine the frequency of family refusal in the context of deceased organ donation and assess whether it differs between DBD and cDCD cases.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center observational study analyzed 6 years of hospital data (2019-2024) from five intensive care units at a tertiary university hospital in Varese, Italy. All patients, regardless of age, who were eligible for deceased organ donation through either DBD or cDCD were included.
Results: A total of 158 patients were evaluated for donation (135 DBD; 23 cDCD). Documented opt-in consent, as recorded in the national donor registry, was available for 41 patients (20%), while 3 had registered their refusal. Two patients were ineligible for donation; for the remaining 112 patients (71%), consent was sought from family members. Family refusal occurred in 28 cases (25% of the 112 families asked for consent). No significant difference in consent rates was observed between DBD and cDCD pathways (DBD: 73/98 vs. cDCD: 11/14; p = 0.74).
Conclusions: Family refusal was the leading reason for missed donation opportunities among patients without documented opt-in consent, accounting for one in four cases. The donation pathway (DBD vs. cDCD) did not significantly influence family decision-making. Given ongoing organ shortages and high wait-list mortality, strategies are needed to support family decisions and to promote the formal registration of opt-in consent among citizens.
背景:等待器官移植的患者数量与供体器官的可用性之间存在很大差距。对于大多数重要器官,没有人工替代品,导致移植等待名单上约3-4%的患者死亡。死者器官捐献有两种途径:脑死亡(DBD)后捐赠或可控循环死亡(cDCD)后捐赠。在患者生前没有书面同意的情况下,许多国家依靠家属做出决定,在患者极度悲痛时给他们带来情感负担。关于家庭对器官捐赠的态度,特别是与死亡方式(DBD vs. cDCD)有关的数据仍然有限。本研究旨在研究死者器官捐献背景下家庭拒绝的频率,并评估DBD和cDCD病例之间是否存在差异。方法:这项回顾性、单中心观察性研究分析了意大利瓦雷塞一所三级大学医院5个重症监护病房6年(2019-2024年)的医院数据。所有符合通过DBD或cDCD进行死者器官捐赠的患者,不论年龄。结果:共有158例患者被评估捐献(135例DBD; 23例cDCD)。41名(20%)患者(记录在国家献血者登记处)获得了书面的选择同意,3名患者登记了拒绝。2例患者不符合捐献条件;其余112例患者(71%)征求了家属的同意。28例家庭拒绝(112个家庭中有25%要求同意)。DBD和cDCD途径的同意率无显著差异(DBD: 73/98 vs. cDCD: 11/14; p = 0.74)。结论:家庭拒绝是没有书面选择同意的患者错过捐赠机会的主要原因,占四分之一。捐献途径(DBD vs. cDCD)对家庭决策没有显著影响。鉴于持续的器官短缺和等待名单上的高死亡率,需要制定战略来支持家庭决定并促进公民选择同意的正式登记。
{"title":"Family refusal rates for organ donation after brain death and after circulatory death: a single-center 6-year experience.","authors":"Federica De Min, Maria Assunta Donato, Elisa Raimondo, Alessandro Ivan De Martino, Alessia Bresil, Alessandra Agnese Grossi, Martina Baiardo Redaelli, Paolo Severgnini, Luca Cabrini","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00301-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00301-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A wide gap exists between the number of patients awaiting organ transplantation and the availability of donor organs. For most vital organs, no artificial substitutes are available, resulting in the death of approximately 3-4% of patients on transplant waiting lists. Deceased organ donation occurs through one of two pathways: donation after brain death (DBD) or after controlled circulatory death (cDCD). In the absence of documented consent during the patient's lifetime, many countries rely on family members to make the decision, placing an emotional burden on them during a time of acute grief. Data on family attitudes toward organ donation, particularly in relation to the mode of death (DBD vs. cDCD), remains limited. This study aimed to examine the frequency of family refusal in the context of deceased organ donation and assess whether it differs between DBD and cDCD cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center observational study analyzed 6 years of hospital data (2019-2024) from five intensive care units at a tertiary university hospital in Varese, Italy. All patients, regardless of age, who were eligible for deceased organ donation through either DBD or cDCD were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 158 patients were evaluated for donation (135 DBD; 23 cDCD). Documented opt-in consent, as recorded in the national donor registry, was available for 41 patients (20%), while 3 had registered their refusal. Two patients were ineligible for donation; for the remaining 112 patients (71%), consent was sought from family members. Family refusal occurred in 28 cases (25% of the 112 families asked for consent). No significant difference in consent rates was observed between DBD and cDCD pathways (DBD: 73/98 vs. cDCD: 11/14; p = 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family refusal was the leading reason for missed donation opportunities among patients without documented opt-in consent, accounting for one in four cases. The donation pathway (DBD vs. cDCD) did not significantly influence family decision-making. Given ongoing organ shortages and high wait-list mortality, strategies are needed to support family decisions and to promote the formal registration of opt-in consent among citizens.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12639733/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145575064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00307-1
Weiquan Liu, Chunling Guo, Juan Deng, Mengyao Jiang, Jie Xiong
Background: Intermittent aspiration of subglottic secretions (IASS) is commonly used to alleviate retention on the cuff, but inappropriate subglottic secretion drainage may lead to adverse effects, and fewer studies have been conducted on active subglottic airway humidification to improve the safety and effectiveness of IASS.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from August 2023 to July 2024, involving 90 patients with flushable tracheostomy tubes: 48 patients received 30-min pre-drainage active humidification (intervention group), while 42 patients received sterile water flush (control group). The outcomes included vital signs, secretion viscosity, cuff pressure, inspired and exhaled tidal volume, catheter blockage, occult blood positivity, and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
Results: The control group demonstrated a higher incidence of occult blood positivity (23.81% vs. 8.33%), blockage rate of the drainage catheter (19.05% vs. 4.17%), and Δcuff pressure (2.90 ± 1.39 cmH2O vs. 1.48 ± 0.99 cmH2O), with all comparisons yielding p < 0.05. Furthermore, the reduction rate of the viscosity of subglottic secretion was lower in the control group than in the intervention group (9.52% vs. 64.58%, p < 0.01). Although ΔVTe and VTleak of the intervention group were significantly increased, no significant differences were observed in ΔSpO2, ΔPETCO2, or the incidence of VAP.
Conclusion: Active subglottic airway humidification prior to IASS significantly reduces the positive rate of occult blood (OB) tests, the incidence of drainage catheter blockage, and secretion viscosity, with the exception of the incidence of VAP. It also stabilizes cuff pressure with minimal fluctuation. Although the intervention is associated with a decrease in exhaled tidal volume, it has no significant impact on pulse oxygen saturation or end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure.
背景:间歇性吸吸声门下分泌物(IASS)是缓解袖带滞留的常用方法,但不适当的声门下分泌物引流可能导致不良反应,对声门下气道主动湿化以提高IASS的安全性和有效性的研究较少。方法:于2023年8月至2024年7月随机对照试验,纳入90例可冲洗气管造瘘管患者,其中48例患者采用30 min预引流主动湿化(干预组),42例患者采用无菌水冲洗(对照组)。结果包括生命体征、分泌物粘度、袖带压力、吸气和呼气潮气量、导管阻塞、隐血阳性和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发生率。结果:对照组隐血阳性发生率(23.81% vs. 8.33%)、引管堵塞率(19.05% vs. 4.17%)、Δcuff血压(2.90±1.39 cmH2O vs. 1.48±0.99 cmH2O)均高于对照组,且干预组p漏率均显著升高,ΔSpO2、ΔPETCO2、VAP发生率差异无统计学意义。结论:除VAP发生率外,IASS术前声门下气道主动湿化可显著降低潜血(OB)试验阳性率、引流管阻塞发生率和分泌物黏度。它也稳定袖口压力最小波动。虽然干预与呼出潮气量的减少有关,但对脉搏氧饱和度或潮末二氧化碳压力没有显著影响。
{"title":"Application of active subglottic airway humidification in intermittent subglottic secretion drainage in patients with tracheostomy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Weiquan Liu, Chunling Guo, Juan Deng, Mengyao Jiang, Jie Xiong","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00307-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00307-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermittent aspiration of subglottic secretions (IASS) is commonly used to alleviate retention on the cuff, but inappropriate subglottic secretion drainage may lead to adverse effects, and fewer studies have been conducted on active subglottic airway humidification to improve the safety and effectiveness of IASS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted from August 2023 to July 2024, involving 90 patients with flushable tracheostomy tubes: 48 patients received 30-min pre-drainage active humidification (intervention group), while 42 patients received sterile water flush (control group). The outcomes included vital signs, secretion viscosity, cuff pressure, inspired and exhaled tidal volume, catheter blockage, occult blood positivity, and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group demonstrated a higher incidence of occult blood positivity (23.81% vs. 8.33%), blockage rate of the drainage catheter (19.05% vs. 4.17%), and Δcuff pressure (2.90 ± 1.39 cmH<sub>2</sub>O vs. 1.48 ± 0.99 cmH<sub>2</sub>O), with all comparisons yielding p < 0.05. Furthermore, the reduction rate of the viscosity of subglottic secretion was lower in the control group than in the intervention group (9.52% vs. 64.58%, p < 0.01). Although ΔVTe and VT<sub>leak</sub> of the intervention group were significantly increased, no significant differences were observed in ΔSpO2, ΔPETCO2, or the incidence of VAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Active subglottic airway humidification prior to IASS significantly reduces the positive rate of occult blood (OB) tests, the incidence of drainage catheter blockage, and secretion viscosity, with the exception of the incidence of VAP. It also stabilizes cuff pressure with minimal fluctuation. Although the intervention is associated with a decrease in exhaled tidal volume, it has no significant impact on pulse oxygen saturation or end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12628611/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145551986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00287-2
Marco Cascella
{"title":"The complex task of modelling artificial intelligence workflows for forecasting postoperative risk.","authors":"Marco Cascella","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00287-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00287-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12628563/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145552083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are integral to multimodal analgesic strategies after non-cardiac surgery, aimed at minimizing opioid exposure. Although their analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy is well established, emerging evidence raises concerns that perioperative NSAID use may increase the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Mechanistic studies suggest multiple pathways for this association, including cyclooxygenase inhibition, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, oxidative stress, and autonomic dysregulation. In this context, perioperative clinicians face the challenge of optimizing pain control while mitigating cardiovascular risk. This review synthesizes preclinical, translational, and clinical data to delineate the potential impact of NSAIDs on POAF risk after non-cardiac surgery, providing a framework for evidence-informed perioperative management.
{"title":"Do nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atrial fibrillation after non-cardiac surgery? Insights from translational and clinical research.","authors":"Eleni Laou, Styliani Mitta, Eleni Voutsadaki, Nicoleta Ntalarizou, Paraskevi Tselioti, Andrea Cortegiani, Athanasios Chalkias","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00303-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s44158-025-00303-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are integral to multimodal analgesic strategies after non-cardiac surgery, aimed at minimizing opioid exposure. Although their analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy is well established, emerging evidence raises concerns that perioperative NSAID use may increase the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Mechanistic studies suggest multiple pathways for this association, including cyclooxygenase inhibition, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, oxidative stress, and autonomic dysregulation. In this context, perioperative clinicians face the challenge of optimizing pain control while mitigating cardiovascular risk. This review synthesizes preclinical, translational, and clinical data to delineate the potential impact of NSAIDs on POAF risk after non-cardiac surgery, providing a framework for evidence-informed perioperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12628894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145552118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}