Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)最新文献

Background: Despite advances in pain management, cancer-related pain remains a critical issue for many patients. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the use of fascial plane blocks, such as the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), for managing chronic pain, including in the oncology field. We conducted a systematic review to synthetize existing evidence on the use of ESPB for cancer pain management.

Methods: We selected studies published between January 2016 to April 2024. A systematic search in Pubmed and Embase databases was performed. The search strategy included the following keywords and/or MeSH terms according to the controlled vocabulary of the databases sought: ((erector spinae plane block) OR (ESP block) OR (ESPB) AND ((cancer pain). We considered eligible Randomized, nonrandomized studies, case series and case reports reporting data on the use of ESPB in patients with cancer pain.

Results: The search revealed 34 studies. Among these, we found one RCT, three retrospective studies, two case series, and 28 case reports for a total of 135 patients. Studies included described the use of ESPB for the management of various types of cancer pain across different conditions, including chronic thoracic cancer-related pain, abdominal visceral pain and pain related to bone metastases. Single-shot ESPB was performed in 26 studies while continuous ESPB and the use of a peripheral nerve catheter for continuous analgesia were described in 8 studies. Neurolytic ESPB was performed in 6 studies for a total of 10 patients There was a high clinical heterogeneity in terms of technique, drugs, and use of adjuvants. The lack of comparators was a major flaw, together with the low level of evidence in the majority of the included studies.

Conclusions: The evidence supporting the use of ESPB for cancer pain management is currently scarce, heterogeneous, and of low quality. To better understand its potential and provide robust clinical guidance, future research needs to focus on rigorous comparative studies, standardization of techniques and larger sample sizes.

Cardiovascular complications are common in patients with severe liver disease and are an important cause of peri-operative and post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM), often found in advanced liver disease, is characterized by diastolic dysfunction, systolic dysfunction, and electrophysiological abnormalities. While CCM may not cause symptoms at rest, it can become evident during stressful activities, such as surgery. Liver transplantation, while being the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease (ESLD), carries significant cardiovascular risks. Preoperative cardiac evaluation is essential for assessing these risks and planning appropriate management. Cardiac imaging, particularly echocardiography, plays a crucial role in evaluating liver transplant candidates, helping to identify conditions such as CCM, pulmonary hypertension, hepatopulmonary syndrome, and others. Currently, liver transplant anesthetists must acquire echocardiographic knowledge and skills to evaluate the cardiocirculatory conditions of the transplanted patient, especially in the pre-operative phase, but also intra-operatively and post-operatively.

The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) has developed a good clinical practice to address the challenges of treating critically ill patients in resource-limited austere environments, exacerbated by recent pandemics, natural disasters, and conflicts. The methodological approach was based on a literature review and a modified Delphi method, which involved blind voting and consensus evaluation using a Likert scale. This process was conducted over two rounds of online voting. The document covers six critical topics: the overall impact of austere conditions on critical care, airway management, analgesia, bleeding control, vascular access, and medical devices and equipment. In these settings, it is vital to apply basic care techniques flexibly, focusing on immediate bleeding control, airway management, and hypothermia treatment to reduce mortality. For airway management, rapid sequence intubation with ketamine for sedation and muscle relaxation is suggested. Effective pain management involves a multimodal approach, including patient-controlled analgesia by quickly acting safe drugs, with an emphasis on ethical palliative care when other options are unavailable. Regarding hemorrhage, military-derived protocols like Tactical Combat Casualty Care significantly reduced mortality and influenced the development of civilian bleeding control devices. Establishing venous access is crucial, with intraosseous access as a swift option and central venous access for complex cases, ensuring aseptic conditions. Lastly, selecting medical equipment that matches the specific logistical and medical needs is essential, maintaining monitoring standards and considering advanced diagnostic tools like point-of-care ultrasounds. Finally, effective communication tools for coordination and telemedicine are also vital.

Introduction: Obesity is one of the biggest modern health issues worldwide. Owing to the failure of both behavioral and pharmacological measures, the surgical approach has been established as the main conduct to follow, with bariatric surgery being one of the most effective and safe procedures. One of the bases for the optimal analgesic strategy is the use of adjuvants during the perioperative period. One of the main drugs in use is lidocaine.

Aim: To evaluate postoperative pain after perioperative lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing bariatric surgery and describe the presence of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 h.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery at ABC Medical Center. Two study arms were established: a group of patients who received lidocaine infusion and a control group. The presence of pain, nausea, or vomiting was evaluated upon admission to the recovery area and 1 h and 24 h after the intervention. The normal distribution of the data was first verified via the Shapiro-Wilk test. The data are presented as medians for quantitative variables and as frequencies for qualitative variables.

Results: A total of 50 surgeries were performed, with a significant correlation between lidocaine infusion and lower pain values at 1 h (p = 0.04). Similarly, there was a marked trend in the presence of nausea in control group 4 (18.6%) vs. 15 (53.5%).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that the use of intraoperative lidocaine infusion is limited in postoperative pain management; nonetheless, it significantly improves the incidence of postoperative nausea.

Background: Perioperative adrenergic vasopressors in kidney transplantation have been linked to negative outcomes and arrhythmias. Synthetic angiotensin II (AT2S) could improve renal hemodynamics, preserve allograft function, and reduce arrhythmias.

Objective: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of AT2S to adrenergic vasopressors when used for perioperative hypotension in kidney transplant.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adults with perioperative shock requiring AT2S or adrenergic agents as first-line vasopressors during kidney transplant. The primary outcome was the need for a second continuous infusion vasopressor agents beyond the first-line agent. Secondary outcomes assessed adverse events and early allograft outcomes.

Results: Twenty patients receiving AT2S and 60 patients receiving adrenergic vasopressor agents were included. Intraoperatively, 1 of 20 patients (5%) in the AT2S group needed a second continuous vasopressor compared to 7 of 60 patients (11.7%) who needed a second continuous vasopressor in the adrenergic vasopressor group (P = 0.672). Postoperatively, 1 of 20 patients (5%) in the AT2S group compared to 12 of 60 patients (20%) in the adrenergic vasopressor group required a second vasopressor (P = 0.168). There were significantly fewer arrhythmias (1/20 [5%] vs. 17/60 [28.3%]), P = 0.03) and ischemic complications (0/20 [0%] vs. 11/20 [18.3%], P = 0.031) in patients who received AT2S. There were no differences in immediate, slow, or delayed graft function or in discharge, 1-month, and 3-month glomerular filtration rates (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Both AT2S and adrenergic vasopressors are effective for perioperative hypotension in kidney transplant, with AT2S showing a lower incidence of arrhythmias and ischemic complications.

Background: Recent studies have unveiled the intricate and distinctive nature of fascia, no longer regarding it solely as a muscle container. Recent research highlights its complex innervation and structure, signifying its significance in chronic pain pathways.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search (updated on February 2024) to evaluate the role of fascial plane blocks in chronic pain treatment. All article types (randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies along with case reports and case series) were deemed eligible for inclusion if they referenced "fascial plane blocks" for the control of chronic pain conditions (persistent post-surgical, neuropathic, musculoskeletal-myofascial and cancer-related) and were published between 2010 and February 2024.

Results: The search revealed an increasing evidence in the literature for the implementation of fascial blocks in chronic pain management, although still heavily limited to case reports or series.

Conclusion: With the integration of ultrasound technology and a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of action, the fascial plane blocks continue to broaden their application also in chronic pain management, as a part of a multimodal strategy or as an alternative to conventional drugs or opioids.

Chronic pain is a pathological condition affecting about 30% of population. It represents a relevant social-health issue worldwide, and it is considered a significant source of human suffering and disability, strongly affecting patients' quality of life. Despite several pharmacological strategies to guarantee an adequate pain management have been proposed over the years, opioids still represent one of the primary choices for treating moderate-to-severe pain in both cancer and non-cancer patients. However, chronic use of opioids often leads to numerous side effects, including respiratory depression, constipation, analgesic tolerance, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), which can strongly limit their use. Given the fundamental role of opioid system in pain relief, this review provides a general overview about the main actors (endogenous opioid peptides and receptors) involved in its modulation. Furthermore, this review explores the action and the limitations of conventional clinically used opioids and describes the efficacy and safety profile of some promising analgesic compounds. A deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind both analgesic effects and adverse events could advance knowledge in this field, thus improving chronic pain treatment.

Introduction: Atelectasis is a well-documented complication in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia. Its incidence varies significantly based on surgical procedures and anesthesia techniques. Inhalation induction, commonly used to avoid the discomfort of venipuncture, is suspected to cause higher rates of respiratory complications, including atelectasis, compared to intravenous induction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of inhalation versus intravenous anesthesia induction on atelectasis formation in pediatric patients, as assessed by lung ultrasound (LUS).

Methods: This propensity score-matched observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Milan, Italy. Inclusion criteria were children ≤ 18 years undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. Patients were divided into inhalation and intravenous induction groups. LUS was performed before and after anesthesia induction to assess lung aeration. The primary endpoint was the global LUS score post-induction, with secondary endpoints including the incidence and distribution of atelectasis.

Results: Of the 326 patients included, 65% underwent inhalation induction and 35% intravenous induction. The global LUS score was significantly higher in the inhalation group (12.0 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching (for age, presence of upper respiratory tract infection, duration of induction, and PEEP levels at induction), average treatment effect (ATE) of mask induction was 5.89 (95% CI, 3.21-8.58; p < 0.001) point on LUS global score and a coefficient of 0.35 (OR 1.41) for atelectasis.

Discussion: Inhalation induction is associated with a higher incidence of atelectasis in pediatric patients also when we adjusted for clinically relevant covariates.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06069414.

Background: Discomfort can be the cause of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) failure in up to 50% of treated patients. Several studies have shown how analgosedation during NRS can reduce the rate of delirium, endotracheal intubation, and hospital length of stay in patients with acute respiratory failure. The purpose of this project was to explore consensus on which medications are currently available as analgosedatives during NRS, which types of patients may benefit from analgosedation while on NRS, and which clinical settings might be appropriate for the implementation of analgosedation during NRS.

Methods: The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects of the use of analgesics and sedatives during NRS treatment. The methodology applied is in line with the principles of the modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales which were then subjected to blind votes for consensus.

Results: The use of an analgosedation strategy in adult patients with acute respiratory failure of different origins may be useful where there is a need to manage discomfort. This strategy should be considered after careful assessment of other potential factors associated with respiratory failure or inappropriate noninvasive respiratory support settings, which may, in turn, be responsible for NRS failure. Several drugs can be used, each of them specifically targeted to the main component of discomfort to treat. In addition, analgosedation during NRS treatment should always be combined with close cardiorespiratory monitoring in an appropriate clinical setting.

Conclusions: The use of analgosedation during NRS has been studied in several clinical trials. However, its successful application relies on a thorough understanding of the pharmacological aspects of the sedative drugs used, the clinical conditions for which NRS is applied, and a careful selection of the appropriate clinical setting.