首页 > 最新文献

Journal of minimally invasive surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration for gallstone and common bile duct stone in a patient with a left-sided gallbladder: a case report. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术治疗左侧胆囊患者的胆结石和胆总管结石:病例报告。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.218
Takeshi Ueda, Tetsuya Tanaka, Yuki Kirihataya, Chisato Hara, Atsushi Yoshimura

Left-sided gallbladder is a rare finding that is mostly discovered incidentally during surgery and is often associated with anatomic anomalies. We herein report a case in which laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration were achieved for an 89-year-old female patient with left-sided gallbladder. Surgery was carried out using our usual trocar position. Calot triangle was covered by the body of the gallbladder and could not be detected. We dissected the gallbladder from the fundus towards the neck. The cystic duct joined the common bile duct from the right side, and common bile duct exploration was performed routinely without perioperative comorbidities. Although the preoperative diagnosis rate is low and the risk of intraoperative bile duct injuries in patients with left-sided gallbladder is high, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration can be safely performed by understanding the location and bifurcation of the cystic duct.

左侧胆囊是一种罕见的发现,大多是在手术中偶然发现的,而且往往与解剖异常有关。我们在此报告一例腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术的病例,患者是一名 89 岁的女性,患有左侧胆囊。手术采用我们常用的套管位置。Calot 三角区被胆囊体覆盖,无法探测。我们从胆囊底向胆囊颈解剖胆囊。胆囊管从右侧汇入胆总管,胆总管探查术常规进行,围手术期无合并症。虽然左侧胆囊患者的术前诊断率较低,术中胆管损伤的风险较高,但通过了解胆囊管的位置和分叉情况,可以安全地进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术和胆总管探查术。
{"title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration for gallstone and common bile duct stone in a patient with a left-sided gallbladder: a case report.","authors":"Takeshi Ueda, Tetsuya Tanaka, Yuki Kirihataya, Chisato Hara, Atsushi Yoshimura","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.218","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left-sided gallbladder is a rare finding that is mostly discovered incidentally during surgery and is often associated with anatomic anomalies. We herein report a case in which laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration were achieved for an 89-year-old female patient with left-sided gallbladder. Surgery was carried out using our usual trocar position. Calot triangle was covered by the body of the gallbladder and could not be detected. We dissected the gallbladder from the fundus towards the neck. The cystic duct joined the common bile duct from the right side, and common bile duct exploration was performed routinely without perioperative comorbidities. Although the preoperative diagnosis rate is low and the risk of intraoperative bile duct injuries in patients with left-sided gallbladder is high, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration can be safely performed by understanding the location and bifurcation of the cystic duct.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"218-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728684/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: a comprehensive analysis of current practices. 韩国的腹腔镜急诊手术:当前实践的综合分析。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.176
Min Hyeong Jo, Heung-Kwon Oh
{"title":"Laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: a comprehensive analysis of current practices.","authors":"Min Hyeong Jo, Heung-Kwon Oh","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.176","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.176","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"176-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 机器人与腹腔镜再造减肥手术:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.198
Karim Ataya, Hussein El Bourji, Ayman Bsat, Amir Al Ayoubi, Al Moutuz Al Jaafreh, George Abi Saad

Purpose: In recent years, the need for revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) procedures has experienced a noteworthy surge to confront complexities and weight recidivism. Despite being a subject of controversy for many, the utilization of the Da Vinci robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) may present benefits in RBS. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of robotic RBS in comparison to Laparoscopic RBS.

Methods: A meticulous and thorough analysis was ensured through a comprehensive exploration of the literature, which included PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane. This exploration was conducted in adherence to the directives outlined in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.

Results: A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 55,889 in the laparoscopic group and 5,809 in the robotic group. No significant differences were observed in the leak, bleeding, operative time, or length of stay across both groups. However, the robotic group showed higher rates of conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.79; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%), reoperation (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; p = 0.0009; I2 = 6%), and readmission (higher rate of readmission in the robotic group; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; p = 0.005; I2 = 30%).

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has no significant advantage over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Further research is warranted to explore and evaluate surgeons' methodology and proficiency differences.

目的:近年来,为应对复杂性和体重复发问题,减肥手术翻修(RBS)的需求显著增加。尽管很多人对达芬奇机器人平台(直觉外科公司)的使用存在争议,但它可能会给 RBS 带来益处。本研究旨在评估机器人 RBS 与腹腔镜 RBS 的效果对比:方法:通过对文献(包括PubMed、Medline、Scopus和Cochrane)的全面探索,确保进行细致而透彻的分析。这项研究遵循了 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)指南的要求。质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表:本次荟萃分析共纳入11项研究,其中腹腔镜组55889例,机器人组5809例。两组在漏血、出血、手术时间或住院时间方面均无明显差异。然而,机器人组显示出更高的转为开腹手术率(几率比 [OR],0.65;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.53-0.79;P < 0.0001;I2 = 0%)、再次手术率(OR,0.70;95% CI,0.57-0.87;P = 0.0009;I2 = 6%)、再入院(机器人组再入院率更高;OR,0.76;95% CI,0.62-0.92;P = 0.005;I2 = 30%):机器人辅助减肥手术与传统腹腔镜手术相比没有明显优势。结论:机器人辅助减重手术与传统腹腔镜手术相比没有明显优势,需要进一步研究和评估外科医生的方法和能力差异。
{"title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Karim Ataya, Hussein El Bourji, Ayman Bsat, Amir Al Ayoubi, Al Moutuz Al Jaafreh, George Abi Saad","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.198","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In recent years, the need for revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) procedures has experienced a noteworthy surge to confront complexities and weight recidivism. Despite being a subject of controversy for many, the utilization of the Da Vinci robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) may present benefits in RBS. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of robotic RBS in comparison to Laparoscopic RBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meticulous and thorough analysis was ensured through a comprehensive exploration of the literature, which included PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane. This exploration was conducted in adherence to the directives outlined in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 55,889 in the laparoscopic group and 5,809 in the robotic group. No significant differences were observed in the leak, bleeding, operative time, or length of stay across both groups. However, the robotic group showed higher rates of conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.79; <i>p</i> < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), reoperation (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.87; <i>p</i> = 0.0009; I<sup>2</sup> = 6%), and readmission (higher rate of readmission in the robotic group; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; <i>p</i> = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has no significant advantage over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Further research is warranted to explore and evaluate surgeons' methodology and proficiency differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"198-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728689/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Simultaneous laparoscopic liver metastasectomy and intersphincteric resection for neuroendocrine tumor of the rectum by natural orifice specimen extraction surgery. 通过自然腔道标本提取手术同时进行腹腔镜直肠神经内分泌肿瘤肝转移切除术和括约肌间切除术
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.215
Mufaddal Kazi, Shraddha Patkar, Avanish Saklani

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are relatively uncommon rectal neoplasms, and the liver is the most common site of distant metastasis. Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections by minimally invasive surgery and natural orifice specimen extraction are gaining popularity, reducing morbidity. We describe a case of rectal NET with liver metastasis operated simultaneously by laparoscopy with both specimens extracted via the anal canal. Transanal or transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for suitable cases is underutilized and only isolated case reports for simultaneous resections exist.

神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)是比较少见的直肠肿瘤,肝脏是最常见的远处转移部位。通过微创手术和自然腔道标本提取同时进行肝脏和结直肠切除术可降低发病率,因此越来越受到欢迎。我们描述了一例直肠NET伴肝转移的病例,该病例通过腹腔镜同时进行手术,经肛管提取两处标本。经肛门或经阴道自然腔道标本抽取手术在适合的病例中应用不足,目前仅有个别病例报告采用了同步切除术。
{"title":"Simultaneous laparoscopic liver metastasectomy and intersphincteric resection for neuroendocrine tumor of the rectum by natural orifice specimen extraction surgery.","authors":"Mufaddal Kazi, Shraddha Patkar, Avanish Saklani","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.215","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are relatively uncommon rectal neoplasms, and the liver is the most common site of distant metastasis. Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections by minimally invasive surgery and natural orifice specimen extraction are gaining popularity, reducing morbidity. We describe a case of rectal NET with liver metastasis operated simultaneously by laparoscopy with both specimens extracted via the anal canal. Transanal or transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for suitable cases is underutilized and only isolated case reports for simultaneous resections exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"215-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138808149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancements and challenges in minimally invasive surgery training among general-surgery residents in Thailand. 泰国普外科住院医师微创手术培训的进步与挑战。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.178
Gyung Mo Son
{"title":"Advancements and challenges in minimally invasive surgery training among general-surgery residents in Thailand.","authors":"Gyung Mo Son","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.178","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.178","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"178-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138806902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system. 使用达芬奇单孔系统进行腹部全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的初步经验。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.208
Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee

From November 2021 to February 2022, 15 patients underwent total abdominal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system. The clinical and pathological results were analyzed retrospectively. All surgeries were performed without conversion. The mean distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 10 cm (range, 2-15 cm). The mean operative time was 191 minutes, the median docking time was 4 minutes (range, 2-10 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 20 mL (range, 20-50 mL). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 16.5, the mean distal resection margin was 3.52 cm, and all patients had circumferential and distal tumor-free resection margins. One patient had minor anastomotic leakage. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.8 ± 2.5 days. Abdominal total mesorectal excision using the da Vinci single port system for rectal cancer is technically feasible and safe, with acceptable pathological and short-term clinical outcomes.

2021年11月至2022年2月,15名患者使用达芬奇单孔系统接受了直肠癌全腹腔系膜切除术。对临床和病理结果进行了回顾性分析。所有手术均未经转换。肿瘤到肛门边缘的平均距离为10厘米(2-15厘米)。平均手术时间为191分钟,中位对接时间为4分钟(2-10分钟不等),估计失血量为20毫升(20-50毫升不等)。切除的淋巴结平均数量为 16.5 个,远端切除边缘平均为 3.52 厘米,所有患者的周缘和远端切除边缘均无肿瘤。一名患者出现轻微吻合口漏。平均住院时间为(5.8 ± 2.5)天。使用达芬奇单孔系统进行腹部全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌在技术上是可行和安全的,其病理结果和短期临床结果均可接受。
{"title":"Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system.","authors":"Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.208","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From November 2021 to February 2022, 15 patients underwent total abdominal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system. The clinical and pathological results were analyzed retrospectively. All surgeries were performed without conversion. The mean distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 10 cm (range, 2-15 cm). The mean operative time was 191 minutes, the median docking time was 4 minutes (range, 2-10 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 20 mL (range, 20-50 mL). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 16.5, the mean distal resection margin was 3.52 cm, and all patients had circumferential and distal tumor-free resection margins. One patient had minor anastomotic leakage. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.8 ± 2.5 days. Abdominal total mesorectal excision using the da Vinci single port system for rectal cancer is technically feasible and safe, with acceptable pathological and short-term clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728682/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138807489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis according to disease severity: single center retrospective study in Korea. 急性胆囊炎中根据病情严重程度采用单切口还是传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:韩国单中心回顾性研究。
Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.180
Seung Jae Lee, Ju Ik Moon, Sang Eok Lee, Nak Song Sung, Seong Uk Kwon, In Eui Bae, Seung Jae Rho, Sung Gon Kim, Min Kyu Kim, Dae Sung Yoon, Won Jun Choi, In Seok Choi

Purpose: The safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) has not yet been confirmed.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AC between April 2010 and December 2020. Propensity scores were used to match patients who underwent SILC with those who underwent conventional multiport LC (CMLC) in the entire cohort and in the two subgroups.

Results: A total of 1,876 patients underwent LC for AC, and 427 (22.8%) underwent SILC. In the propensity score-matched analysis of the entire cohort (404 patients in each group), the length of hospital stay (2.9 days vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.029) was shorter in the SILC group than in the CMLC group. No significant differences were observed in other surgical outcomes. In grade I AC (336 patients in each group), the SILC group showed poorer surgical outcomes than the CMLC group, regarding operation time (57.6 minutes vs. 52.4 minutes, p = 0.001) and estimated blood loss (22.9 mL vs. 13.1 mL, p = 0.006). In grade II/III AC (58 patients in each group), there were no significant differences in surgical outcomes between the two groups. Postoperative pain outcomes were also not significantly different in the two groups, regardless of severity.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SILC had similar surgical and pain outcomes to CMLC in patients with AC; however, subgroup analysis showed that SILC was associated with poor surgical outcomes than CMLC in grade I AC. Therefore, SILC should be carefully performed in patients with AC by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.

目的:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)治疗急性胆囊炎(AC)的安全性尚未得到证实:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2010年4月至2020年12月期间因急性胆囊炎接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的患者。在整个队列和两个亚组中,采用倾向评分对接受 SILC 和接受传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CMLC)的患者进行配对:共有 1,876 名患者因 AC 接受了 LC 治疗,其中 427 人(22.8%)接受了 SILC 治疗。在对整个队列(每组 404 名患者)进行倾向得分匹配分析时,SILC 组的住院时间(2.9 天 vs. 3.5 天,p = 0.029)短于 CMLC 组。其他手术结果无明显差异。在 I 级 AC(每组 336 例患者)中,SILC 组在手术时间(57.6 分钟对 52.4 分钟,p = 0.001)和估计失血量(22.9 毫升对 13.1 毫升,p = 0.006)方面的手术效果比 CMLC 组差。在 II/III 级 AC 中(每组 58 名患者),两组的手术效果无显著差异。无论严重程度如何,两组患者的术后疼痛结果也无明显差异:本研究表明,SILC 与 CMLC 对 AC 患者的手术和疼痛疗效相似;然而,亚组分析显示,在 I 级 AC 中,SILC 的手术疗效比 CMLC 差。因此,应由经验丰富的肝胆外科医生为 AC 患者谨慎实施 SILC。
{"title":"Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis according to disease severity: single center retrospective study in Korea.","authors":"Seung Jae Lee, Ju Ik Moon, Sang Eok Lee, Nak Song Sung, Seong Uk Kwon, In Eui Bae, Seung Jae Rho, Sung Gon Kim, Min Kyu Kim, Dae Sung Yoon, Won Jun Choi, In Seok Choi","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.180","DOIUrl":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) has not yet been confirmed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AC between April 2010 and December 2020. Propensity scores were used to match patients who underwent SILC with those who underwent conventional multiport LC (CMLC) in the entire cohort and in the two subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,876 patients underwent LC for AC, and 427 (22.8%) underwent SILC. In the propensity score-matched analysis of the entire cohort (404 patients in each group), the length of hospital stay (2.9 days vs. 3.5 days, <i>p</i> = 0.029) was shorter in the SILC group than in the CMLC group. No significant differences were observed in other surgical outcomes. In grade I AC (336 patients in each group), the SILC group showed poorer surgical outcomes than the CMLC group, regarding operation time (57.6 minutes vs. 52.4 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and estimated blood loss (22.9 mL vs. 13.1 mL, <i>p</i> = 0.006). In grade II/III AC (58 patients in each group), there were no significant differences in surgical outcomes between the two groups. Postoperative pain outcomes were also not significantly different in the two groups, regardless of severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that SILC had similar surgical and pain outcomes to CMLC in patients with AC; however, subgroup analysis showed that SILC was associated with poor surgical outcomes than CMLC in grade I AC. Therefore, SILC should be carefully performed in patients with AC by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138808298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy for a large hepatocellular carcinoma close to inferior vena cava. 腹腔镜右后切开术治疗靠近下腔静脉的大肝癌。
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.162
Santhosh Anand, Loganathan Jayapal, Siddhesh Suresh Tasgaonkar Ema, Jainudeen Khalander Abdul Jameel, Prasanna Kumar Reddy

Approximately 20% of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) occur in noncirrhotic livers. Resection may be considered for patients with HCC, provided sufficient future liver remnant is available, regardless of the tumor size. Tumors located posteriorly near the right hepatic vein (RHV), or inferior vena cava can be managed through anterior or caudal approaches. RHV is typically conserved during right posterior sectionectomy. When a large posteriorly placed tumor causes chronic compression on RHV, the right anterior section drainage is redirected preferentially to the middle hepatic vein. The division of RHV in such instances does not cause congestion of segments 8 and 5. The technical complexity of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy arises from the large transection surface, positioned horizontally. We describe in this multimedia article, a case of large HCC in segments 6 and 7, which was successfully treated using laparoscopic anatomic right posterior sectionectomy.

大约20%的肝细胞癌(HCC)发生在非肝硬化肝脏。无论肿瘤大小,只要将来有足够的肝残体,HCC患者可以考虑切除。位于右肝静脉(RHV)后方或下腔静脉附近的肿瘤可通过前或尾侧入路处理。在右侧后段切除术中,RHV通常是保守的。当一个大的后置肿瘤引起RHV的慢性压迫时,右前段引流优先重定向到肝中静脉。在这种情况下,RHV的划分不会引起8段和5段的拥塞。腹腔镜右后切开术的技术复杂性源于横切面大,水平定位。在这篇多媒体文章中,我们描述了一例6节段和7节段的大肝癌,并成功地采用腹腔镜解剖右后切开术治疗。
{"title":"Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy for a large hepatocellular carcinoma close to inferior vena cava.","authors":"Santhosh Anand,&nbsp;Loganathan Jayapal,&nbsp;Siddhesh Suresh Tasgaonkar Ema,&nbsp;Jainudeen Khalander Abdul Jameel,&nbsp;Prasanna Kumar Reddy","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 20% of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) occur in noncirrhotic livers. Resection may be considered for patients with HCC, provided sufficient future liver remnant is available, regardless of the tumor size. Tumors located posteriorly near the right hepatic vein (RHV), or inferior vena cava can be managed through anterior or caudal approaches. RHV is typically conserved during right posterior sectionectomy. When a large posteriorly placed tumor causes chronic compression on RHV, the right anterior section drainage is redirected preferentially to the middle hepatic vein. The division of RHV in such instances does not cause congestion of segments 8 and 5. The technical complexity of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy arises from the large transection surface, positioned horizontally. We describe in this multimedia article, a case of large HCC in segments 6 and 7, which was successfully treated using laparoscopic anatomic right posterior sectionectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"162-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/23/jmis-26-3-162.PMC10505367.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do we all agree that the future of pancreaticoduodenectomy lies in how effectively we use robots? 我们是否都同意胰十二指肠切除术的未来取决于我们如何有效地使用机器人?
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.110
Jae Hoon Lee
The penetration of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has been low due to the technically demanding surgical dissection, many anastomotic procedures needed, and the lack of confidence regarding the additional benefits from the minimally invasive approach compared to the conventional open approach [1]. However, retrospective series and randomized trials have reported some key advantages of MIPD, which include a decrease in intraoperative blood loss, wound complications, and postoperative pain, in addition to a shorter length of stay compared with the open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) [2–4]. Since robotic PD (RPD) surgery was first performed in 2003, the development of robotic platforms and the accumulation of surgical experience has meant that RPD has led to a gradual increase of adoption RPD [5]. However, no large comparative studies have been performed for RPD and laparoscopic PD (LPD), even though only a limited number of institutions perform MIPD [6]. There are two main adopters for the robotic platform in PD depending on the preference of the surgeons. Indeed, surgeons who began their MIPD journey using laparoscopy tend to prefer a hybrid approach of laparoscopic resection and robotic reconstruction, whereas other surgeons prefer a full robotic approach. There are a multitude of reasons why some surgeons prefer a hybrid approach: (1) Familiarity with the surgical devices and the operative field is a critical factor in proficient and efficacious procedures for MIPD surgeons. (2) The availability of multi-fire
{"title":"Do we all agree that the future of pancreaticoduodenectomy lies in how effectively we use robots?","authors":"Jae Hoon Lee","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.110","url":null,"abstract":"The penetration of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has been low due to the technically demanding surgical dissection, many anastomotic procedures needed, and the lack of confidence regarding the additional benefits from the minimally invasive approach compared to the conventional open approach [1]. However, retrospective series and randomized trials have reported some key advantages of MIPD, which include a decrease in intraoperative blood loss, wound complications, and postoperative pain, in addition to a shorter length of stay compared with the open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) [2–4]. Since robotic PD (RPD) surgery was first performed in 2003, the development of robotic platforms and the accumulation of surgical experience has meant that RPD has led to a gradual increase of adoption RPD [5]. However, no large comparative studies have been performed for RPD and laparoscopic PD (LPD), even though only a limited number of institutions perform MIPD [6]. There are two main adopters for the robotic platform in PD depending on the preference of the surgeons. Indeed, surgeons who began their MIPD journey using laparoscopy tend to prefer a hybrid approach of laparoscopic resection and robotic reconstruction, whereas other surgeons prefer a full robotic approach. There are a multitude of reasons why some surgeons prefer a hybrid approach: (1) Familiarity with the surgical devices and the operative field is a critical factor in proficient and efficacious procedures for MIPD surgeons. (2) The availability of multi-fire","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"110-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/b9/jmis-26-3-110.PMC10505360.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current status of laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: multicenter restrospective cohort study. 韩国腹腔镜急诊手术现状:多中心回顾性队列研究
Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.112
Jung-Min Bae, Chang-Yeon Jung, Keesang Yoo, Hak-Jae Lee, Suk-Kyung Hong, Sungyeon Yoo, Yun Tae Jung, Eun Young Kim, Min Jung Ko, Ho-Gyun Shin

Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery is a choice in several emergency settings. However, there has been no nationwide study or survey that has compared the clinical use of laparoscopic emergency surgery (LES) versus open abdominal emergency surgery (OES) in Korea. Therefore, we examined the state of LES across multiple centers in Korea and further compared this data with the global state based on published reports.

Methods: Data of 2,122 patients who received abdominal emergency surgery between 2014 and 2019 in three hospitals in Korea were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Several clinical factors were investigated and analyzed.

Results: Of the patients, 1,280 (60.3%) were in the OES group and 842 (39.7%) were in the LES group. The most commonly operated organ in OES was the small bowel (25.8%), whereas that for LES was the appendix. In appendectomy and cholecystectomy, 93.7% and 88.0% were in the LES group. In small bowel surgery, gastric surgery, and large bowel surgery, 89.4%, 92.0%, and 79.1% were in the OES group. The severity-related factors of patient status demonstrated statistically significant limiting factors of selection between LES and OES.

Conclusion: Although our study has several limitations, compared to the LES data from other countries, the general LES state was similar in appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and small bowel surgeries. However, in gastric and colorectal surgeries, the LES state was different from those of other countries. This study demonstrated the LES state and limiting factors of selection between LES and OES in various operated organs. Further studies are required to analyze these differences and the various limiting factors.

目的:腹腔镜手术是几种紧急情况下的一种选择。然而,在韩国,还没有全国性的研究或调查来比较腹腔镜急诊手术(LES)和开放式腹部急诊手术(OES)的临床应用。因此,我们检查了韩国多个中心的LES状况,并根据已发表的报告进一步将这些数据与全球状况进行了比较。方法:收集2014 - 2019年韩国3家医院2122例腹部急诊手术患者的资料进行回顾性分析。对几个临床因素进行调查和分析。结果:OES组1280例(60.3%),LES组842例(39.7%)。OES中最常手术的器官是小肠(25.8%),而LES中最常手术的器官是阑尾。在阑尾切除术和胆囊切除术中,LES组分别占93.7%和88.0%。在小肠手术、胃手术和大肠手术中,OES组占89.4%、92.0%和79.1%。患者状态的严重程度相关因素在LES和OES之间的选择具有统计学意义的限制因素。结论:虽然我们的研究存在一些局限性,但与其他国家的LES数据相比,阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术和小肠手术的LES总体状态相似。然而,在胃和结肠手术中,LES状态与其他国家不同。本研究揭示了不同手术器官的LES状态及LES与OES选择的限制因素。需要进一步的研究来分析这些差异和各种限制因素。
{"title":"Current status of laparoscopic emergency surgery in Korea: multicenter restrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jung-Min Bae,&nbsp;Chang-Yeon Jung,&nbsp;Keesang Yoo,&nbsp;Hak-Jae Lee,&nbsp;Suk-Kyung Hong,&nbsp;Sungyeon Yoo,&nbsp;Yun Tae Jung,&nbsp;Eun Young Kim,&nbsp;Min Jung Ko,&nbsp;Ho-Gyun Shin","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery is a choice in several emergency settings. However, there has been no nationwide study or survey that has compared the clinical use of laparoscopic emergency surgery (LES) versus open abdominal emergency surgery (OES) in Korea. Therefore, we examined the state of LES across multiple centers in Korea and further compared this data with the global state based on published reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 2,122 patients who received abdominal emergency surgery between 2014 and 2019 in three hospitals in Korea were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Several clinical factors were investigated and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients, 1,280 (60.3%) were in the OES group and 842 (39.7%) were in the LES group. The most commonly operated organ in OES was the small bowel (25.8%), whereas that for LES was the appendix. In appendectomy and cholecystectomy, 93.7% and 88.0% were in the LES group. In small bowel surgery, gastric surgery, and large bowel surgery, 89.4%, 92.0%, and 79.1% were in the OES group. The severity-related factors of patient status demonstrated statistically significant limiting factors of selection between LES and OES.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although our study has several limitations, compared to the LES data from other countries, the general LES state was similar in appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and small bowel surgeries. However, in gastric and colorectal surgeries, the LES state was different from those of other countries. This study demonstrated the LES state and limiting factors of selection between LES and OES in various operated organs. Further studies are required to analyze these differences and the various limiting factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"26 3","pages":"112-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/85/jmis-26-3-112.PMC10505370.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of minimally invasive surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1