首页 > 最新文献

Journal of participatory research methods最新文献

英文 中文
Program Evaluation and Improvement by a Homeless Community Using a Human Centered Design Approach 无家可归者社区采用以人为本的设计方法进行项目评估和改进
Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.35844/001c.92256
Conner Olson, Stuart W. Grande, William Toran, William Walsh
People experiencing homelessness are often absent from the development and implementation of new housing projects. As mounting evidence demonstrates the link between health and housing, it seems ineffective to design solutions without the participation and insight of those who are chronically unhoused. This study describes a method for program and product evaluation that people with lived experience of homelessness can use to determine the value of new offerings and then design improvements based on their evaluation. Specifically, this article reports the experience of evaluating a handbook describing the operations of a new type of housing for people experiencing homelessness. The research team, which included people with lived experience of homelessness, performed interviews to evaluate plans in the handbook, analyzed those results, and designed improvements in the operations of the housing based on the program evaluation. The team utilized participatory analysis of the interview data and then used a Human-Centered Design approach to generate ideas based on the analysis and develop concepts to improve the operational plan. The evaluation identified four high-priority problems with the operational plan and the group then designed three unique solutions to address those problems. This project demonstrates that people with lived experience of homelessness can participate as equal partners in the evaluation of a program and the subsequent program improvement design that was based on their evaluations.
在新住房项目的开发和实施过程中,无家可归者往往缺席。越来越多的证据表明,健康与住房之间存在联系,如果没有长期无家可归者的参与和洞察力,设计解决方案似乎是无效的。本研究介绍了一种计划和产品评估方法,无家可归者可以利用这种方法来确定新产品的价值,然后根据评估结果设计改进方案。具体来说,本文报告了对一本介绍新型无家可归者住房运作的手册进行评估的经验。研究小组成员包括有无家可归经历的人,他们通过访谈对手册中的计划进行了评估,分析了这些结果,并根据计划评估结果设计了住房运营的改进方案。研究小组对访谈数据进行了参与式分析,然后采用以人为本的设计方法,在分析的基础上提出了改进运营计划的想法和概念。评估确定了运营计划中四个高度优先的问题,小组随后设计了三个独特的解决方案来解决这些问题。该项目表明,有无家可归经历的人可以作为平等的合作伙伴参与计划评估,并根据他们的评估结果进行后续的计划改进设计。
{"title":"Program Evaluation and Improvement by a Homeless Community Using a Human Centered Design Approach","authors":"Conner Olson, Stuart W. Grande, William Toran, William Walsh","doi":"10.35844/001c.92256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.92256","url":null,"abstract":"People experiencing homelessness are often absent from the development and implementation of new housing projects. As mounting evidence demonstrates the link between health and housing, it seems ineffective to design solutions without the participation and insight of those who are chronically unhoused. This study describes a method for program and product evaluation that people with lived experience of homelessness can use to determine the value of new offerings and then design improvements based on their evaluation. Specifically, this article reports the experience of evaluating a handbook describing the operations of a new type of housing for people experiencing homelessness. The research team, which included people with lived experience of homelessness, performed interviews to evaluate plans in the handbook, analyzed those results, and designed improvements in the operations of the housing based on the program evaluation. The team utilized participatory analysis of the interview data and then used a Human-Centered Design approach to generate ideas based on the analysis and develop concepts to improve the operational plan. The evaluation identified four high-priority problems with the operational plan and the group then designed three unique solutions to address those problems. This project demonstrates that people with lived experience of homelessness can participate as equal partners in the evaluation of a program and the subsequent program improvement design that was based on their evaluations.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":"179 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140757135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Partnering for Progress: Lessons Learned from a Mental Health Assessment for Youth Living with HIV in India through Community-Based Participatory Research. 合作促进进步:通过社区参与性研究对印度感染艾滋病毒的青年进行心理健康评估的经验教训。
Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.35844/001c.117611
Siddhaparna Sannigrahi, Babu Seenappa, Prashant Laxmikanth, Suhas Reddy, Kacie Filian, Michael Babu Raj, Lakshmi Ganapathi, Anita Shet

Youth living with HIV (YLHIV) face diverse mental health challenges necessitating interventions informed by their lived experiences. Failure to do so can perpetuate a self-reinforcing cycle of misaligned and ineffective support, further exacerbating existing vulnerabilities. This study directly addresses this gap by using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to empower YLHIV in India to address their mental health challenges. YLHIV actively participated in adapting and implementing a culturally responsive mental health screening program. The study, incorporating CBPR principles at every step aimed to identify practical methods for integrating YLHIV voices in research, and showcase the value of YLHIV participation in co-creating and implementing impactful interventions. Six youth investigators aged 18-24, born with HIV and residing in southern Indian states underwent certification in human subjects' protection and training in mental health screening and survey administration techniques. They actively shaped the research process by culturally adapting standardized mental health screening tools (PHQ-9, GAD-7) through iterative discussions with experts, drawing on their own perspectives. Following field assessments of the mental health screening tools among their peers, they documented their reflections in surveys and written essays. Youth investigators' involvement improved the research process by optimizing tools, combating stigma, and facilitating reliable data collection. Beyond data collection, the youth investigators' participation significantly boosted their own knowledge, self-confidence, and research skills. This study serves as an illustrative model of CBPR in mental health research among YLHIV, highlighting the importance of interactive training, continuous feedback mechanisms, and respectful youth engagement in fostering impactful research that can inform tailored sustainable interventions.

感染艾滋病毒的青年面临各种心理健康挑战,需要根据他们的生活经历采取干预措施。如果做不到这一点,就会使错位和无效支持的自我强化循环永久化,进一步加剧现有的脆弱性。这项研究通过使用基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)方法,直接解决了这一差距,使印度的YLHIV能够解决他们的心理健康挑战。YLHIV积极参与调整和实施符合文化的精神健康筛查方案。该研究将CBPR原则纳入每一步,旨在确定将YLHIV的声音纳入研究的实用方法,并展示YLHIV参与共同创造和实施有影响力的干预措施的价值。6名年龄在18-24岁、出生时携带艾滋病毒并居住在印度南部各邦的青年调查人员接受了人类受试者保护认证和心理健康筛查和调查管理技术培训。他们积极塑造研究过程,通过与专家反复讨论,借鉴自己的观点,在文化上适应标准化的心理健康筛查工具(PHQ-9, GAD-7)。在对同龄人的心理健康筛查工具进行实地评估后,他们在调查和写作论文中记录了自己的感想。青年研究者的参与通过优化工具、打击污名和促进可靠的数据收集,改善了研究过程。除了数据收集之外,青年研究者的参与显著提高了他们的知识、自信和研究技能。本研究作为CBPR在YLHIV心理健康研究中的说明模型,强调了互动培训、持续反馈机制和尊重青年参与在促进有影响力的研究中的重要性,这些研究可以为量身定制的可持续干预提供信息。
{"title":"Partnering for Progress: Lessons Learned from a Mental Health Assessment for Youth Living with HIV in India through Community-Based Participatory Research.","authors":"Siddhaparna Sannigrahi, Babu Seenappa, Prashant Laxmikanth, Suhas Reddy, Kacie Filian, Michael Babu Raj, Lakshmi Ganapathi, Anita Shet","doi":"10.35844/001c.117611","DOIUrl":"10.35844/001c.117611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Youth living with HIV (YLHIV) face diverse mental health challenges necessitating interventions informed by their lived experiences. Failure to do so can perpetuate a self-reinforcing cycle of misaligned and ineffective support, further exacerbating existing vulnerabilities. This study directly addresses this gap by using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to empower YLHIV in India to address their mental health challenges. YLHIV actively participated in adapting and implementing a culturally responsive mental health screening program. The study, incorporating CBPR principles at every step aimed to identify practical methods for integrating YLHIV voices in research, and showcase the value of YLHIV participation in co-creating and implementing impactful interventions. Six youth investigators aged 18-24, born with HIV and residing in southern Indian states underwent certification in human subjects' protection and training in mental health screening and survey administration techniques. They actively shaped the research process by culturally adapting standardized mental health screening tools (PHQ-9, GAD-7) through iterative discussions with experts, drawing on their own perspectives. Following field assessments of the mental health screening tools among their peers, they documented their reflections in surveys and written essays. Youth investigators' involvement improved the research process by optimizing tools, combating stigma, and facilitating reliable data collection. Beyond data collection, the youth investigators' participation significantly boosted their own knowledge, self-confidence, and research skills. This study serves as an illustrative model of CBPR in mental health research among YLHIV, highlighting the importance of interactive training, continuous feedback mechanisms, and respectful youth engagement in fostering impactful research that can inform tailored sustainable interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064158/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144065315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The NCCB Case Example: Reflections on a Successful Fourteen-Year CBPR Partnership. NCCB案例:对成功的14年CBPR伙伴关系的思考。
Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.35844/001c.120896
Alexis D Jemal, Ellen Benoit, Shola Thompson, Heather A Jones, Liliane Windsor, Teri Lassiter, Warren Thompson

The Newark Community Collaborative Board (NCCB) is in its fourteenth year of operation with nine successful research projects and more than six million dollars in funding. The NCCB began with a community needs assessment in Newark, New Jersey, that led to the subsequent establishment of a community collaborative board (CCB) of consumers, researchers, service providers, and residents committed to advocating for health equity through community engagement and research informed by critical thinking. This paper explores the NCCB's history and processes that allowed conducting community-based participatory research (CBPR) to reduce inequities related to social determinants of health (SDH). This conceptual manuscript draws on data from NCCB meeting minutes and a group interview with three of the five founding members. We detail the collaborative process used to develop and assess Community Wise, a multilevel, group-based intervention designed to reduce substance use among formerly incarcerated men in Newark, funded by the National Institutes of Health. Review of documentation and interview transcripts revealed the following key ingredients for success: 1) Having a north star; 2) Functional diversity; 3) Challenges as learning opportunities; 4) Board structure and healthy relationships; and 5) Funding and resources. The NCCB has undergone multiple transformations, including a name change to the New Jersey Critical Consciousness Collaborative Board (NJ-3CB), representing its growth from being a small local board to becoming part of a network of community collaborative boards across the United States and a chapter of the global campaign against racism. These and future transitions will help sustain the collaborative journey.

纽瓦克社区合作委员会(NCCB)已经运作了14年,有9个成功的研究项目和超过600万美元的资金。NCCB从新泽西州纽瓦克的社区需求评估开始,随后建立了一个由消费者、研究人员、服务提供者和居民组成的社区合作委员会(CCB),致力于通过社区参与和批判性思维的研究来倡导卫生公平。本文探讨了NCCB的历史和允许开展基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)以减少与健康的社会决定因素(SDH)相关的不平等的过程。这个概念性的手稿借鉴了NCCB会议记录和对五位创始成员中的三位的小组采访的数据。我们详细介绍了用于开发和评估Community Wise的合作过程,Community Wise是一种多层次、基于群体的干预措施,旨在减少纽瓦克前监禁男性的物质使用,由国家卫生研究院资助。对文件和面试记录的回顾揭示了成功的以下关键因素:1)有一个北极星;2)功能多样性;3)挑战即学习机会;4)董事会结构和健康的关系;5)资金和资源。NCCB经历了多次转型,包括更名为新泽西批判意识合作委员会(NJ-3CB),代表着它从一个小的地方委员会成长为全美社区合作委员会网络的一部分,并成为全球反种族主义运动的一个篇章。这些和未来的转变将有助于维持合作之旅。
{"title":"The NCCB Case Example: Reflections on a Successful Fourteen-Year CBPR Partnership.","authors":"Alexis D Jemal, Ellen Benoit, Shola Thompson, Heather A Jones, Liliane Windsor, Teri Lassiter, Warren Thompson","doi":"10.35844/001c.120896","DOIUrl":"10.35844/001c.120896","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Newark Community Collaborative Board (NCCB) is in its fourteenth year of operation with nine successful research projects and more than six million dollars in funding. The NCCB began with a community needs assessment in Newark, New Jersey, that led to the subsequent establishment of a community collaborative board (CCB) of consumers, researchers, service providers, and residents committed to advocating for health equity through community engagement and research informed by critical thinking. This paper explores the NCCB's history and processes that allowed conducting community-based participatory research (CBPR) to reduce inequities related to social determinants of health (SDH). This conceptual manuscript draws on data from NCCB meeting minutes and a group interview with three of the five founding members. We detail the collaborative process used to develop and assess Community Wise, a multilevel, group-based intervention designed to reduce substance use among formerly incarcerated men in Newark, funded by the National Institutes of Health. Review of documentation and interview transcripts revealed the following key ingredients for success: 1) Having a north star; 2) Functional diversity; 3) Challenges as learning opportunities; 4) Board structure and healthy relationships; and 5) Funding and resources. The NCCB has undergone multiple transformations, including a name change to the New Jersey Critical Consciousness Collaborative Board (NJ-3CB), representing its growth from being a small local board to becoming part of a network of community collaborative boards across the United States and a chapter of the global campaign against racism. These and future transitions will help sustain the collaborative journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887649/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143588578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Trusted in Being the Experts of Being a Student”: Participatory Evaluation in Higher Education “做学生的专家值得信赖”:高等教育中的参与式评价
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.35844/001c.75240
Liz Austen, A. Donnelly
This report describes a participatory evaluation of a postgraduate course delivered at the University of Winchester in the UK. The PGCert/MA in Student Engagement in Higher Education utilized sector-leading practices and research to explore student engagement in contemporary higher education. As co-creation, co-design, and staff-student partnerships are integral concepts within student engagement scholarship and practice, a congruent participatory evaluation of the PGCert/MA was conducted. This approach utilized an Advisory Group of current students and graduates to co-construct a Theory of Change, design data-gathering methods, and support the synthesis of findings and associated recommendations. This report provides details of the stages of this evaluation and the participatory activities which were designed and delivered. In addition to providing a robust conclusion on the process, impact, and outcomes of the course, this report discusses the benefits and challenges of participatory evaluation.
本报告描述了对英国温彻斯特大学研究生课程的参与式评估。高等教育学生参与PGCert/MA利用行业领先的实践和研究来探索学生参与当代高等教育。由于共同创建、共同设计和师生伙伴关系是学生参与奖学金和实践中不可或缺的概念,因此对PGCert/MA进行了一致的参与性评估。这种方法利用了一个由在校学生和毕业生组成的咨询小组来共同构建变革理论,设计数据收集方法,并支持研究结果和相关建议的综合。本报告详细介绍了本次评估的各个阶段以及设计和实施的参与性活动。除了对课程的过程、影响和结果提供有力的结论外,本报告还讨论了参与式评估的好处和挑战。
{"title":"“Trusted in Being the Experts of Being a Student”: Participatory Evaluation in Higher Education","authors":"Liz Austen, A. Donnelly","doi":"10.35844/001c.75240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.75240","url":null,"abstract":"This report describes a participatory evaluation of a postgraduate course delivered at the University of Winchester in the UK. The PGCert/MA in Student Engagement in Higher Education utilized sector-leading practices and research to explore student engagement in contemporary higher education. As co-creation, co-design, and staff-student partnerships are integral concepts within student engagement scholarship and practice, a congruent participatory evaluation of the PGCert/MA was conducted. This approach utilized an Advisory Group of current students and graduates to co-construct a Theory of Change, design data-gathering methods, and support the synthesis of findings and associated recommendations. This report provides details of the stages of this evaluation and the participatory activities which were designed and delivered. In addition to providing a robust conclusion on the process, impact, and outcomes of the course, this report discusses the benefits and challenges of participatory evaluation.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48049080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using Participatory Research to Develop a Culturally Responsive Early Childhood Assessment Tool 利用参与式研究开发文化反应性幼儿评估工具
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.35844/001c.77624
Hattie Harvey, Jennifer Pierce, D. Hirshberg
Early childhood educators are uniquely positioned to advance equity by providing culturally-responsive early learning environments and developing respectful and reciprocal relationships with families. Culturally-responsive teaching practices recognize the diverse cultures of children and families as strengths and empower children through cultural values of their family heritage (Gay, 2010). One early childhood program serving Alaska Native and American Indian (AN/AI) children and families identified a need to more systematically support educators’ reflection on their knowledge, skills, and abilities related to cultural programming. This paper aims to describe the process of and lessons learned from using a participatory, community-based research approach to develop a culturally-responsive early childhood assessment tool. Operating from a postmodern/transformative paradigm, we describe the journey of this process with particular attention to shifting power to the community participants and carefully attending to our own reflexivity as three white researchers collaborating with a tribal non-profit organization.
幼儿教育工作者在通过提供符合文化的早期学习环境和发展与家庭的相互尊重和互惠关系来促进公平方面处于独特地位。文化响应型教学实践承认儿童和家庭的多元文化是优势,并通过家庭遗产的文化价值观赋予儿童权力(Gay, 2010)。一个为阿拉斯加原住民和美国印第安人(AN/AI)儿童和家庭服务的早期儿童项目发现,需要更系统地支持教育工作者对他们与文化项目有关的知识、技能和能力的反思。本文旨在描述使用参与式、以社区为基础的研究方法开发文化响应性幼儿评估工具的过程和经验教训。从后现代/变革范式出发,我们描述了这一过程的旅程,特别关注将权力转移给社区参与者,并仔细关注我们自己作为三名白人研究人员与部落非营利组织合作的反思。
{"title":"Using Participatory Research to Develop a Culturally Responsive Early Childhood Assessment Tool","authors":"Hattie Harvey, Jennifer Pierce, D. Hirshberg","doi":"10.35844/001c.77624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.77624","url":null,"abstract":"Early childhood educators are uniquely positioned to advance equity by providing culturally-responsive early learning environments and developing respectful and reciprocal relationships with families. Culturally-responsive teaching practices recognize the diverse cultures of children and families as strengths and empower children through cultural values of their family heritage (Gay, 2010). One early childhood program serving Alaska Native and American Indian (AN/AI) children and families identified a need to more systematically support educators’ reflection on their knowledge, skills, and abilities related to cultural programming. This paper aims to describe the process of and lessons learned from using a participatory, community-based research approach to develop a culturally-responsive early childhood assessment tool. Operating from a postmodern/transformative paradigm, we describe the journey of this process with particular attention to shifting power to the community participants and carefully attending to our own reflexivity as three white researchers collaborating with a tribal non-profit organization.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47800898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review 参与式研究对研究人员和学术机构的紧急建议:快速范围审查
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.35844/001c.74807
Benjamin Scher, Juliet Scott-Barrett, M. Hickman, B. Chrisinger
In recent years, a range of academic disciplines have emphasized the potential benefits of prioritizing meaningful engagement with individuals and communities who have lived and have living experience with the topics, phenomena and problems researchers seek to study. In March 2022, we were asked to produce a paper to inform a university workshop and training materials to help students and faculty engage with participatory methods. In turn, we conducted a rapid scoping review of reviews to document key recommendations relating to methodology, logistics and ethics within the various modes of participatory research. Searches were conducted in Web of Science, SCOPUS, ProQuest, Pub Med, OVID (including Medline, PschyInfo/EMBASE, APAPsych) to identify published academic reviews (e.g., systematic, scoping, literature reviews and evidence gap maps), for best practices relating to participatory research. This approach drew out aggregated best practices and lessons learned across many primary studies and increased the speed of the review. From 276 studies imported for screening, 43 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility and 28 were deemed relevant for full inclusion. Results are presented as: 1) participatory research recommendations for researchers; and 2) participatory research recommendations for academic institutions. Three sub-themes emerged within the context of suggestions for researchers engaging with participatory methods: 1) early-stage considerations for study design and planning; 2) conducting the research; and 3) dissemination and knowledge exchange. This rapid scoping review highlights key recommendations for researchers interested in using participatory approaches in their own research, and for academic and institutional stakeholders who aim to support these practices.
近年来,一系列学术学科都强调了优先考虑与研究人员寻求研究的主题、现象和问题有过或有过生活经验的个人和社区进行有意义的接触的潜在好处。在2022年3月,我们被要求制作一篇论文,为大学研讨会和培训材料提供信息,以帮助学生和教师采用参与式方法。反过来,我们对审查进行了快速的范围审查,以记录与各种参与式研究模式中的方法,后勤和道德有关的关键建议。在Web of Science、SCOPUS、ProQuest、Pub Med、OVID(包括Medline、PschyInfo/EMBASE、APAPsych)中进行检索,以确定已发表的学术综述(例如,系统性、范围界定、文献综述和证据差距图),寻找与参与性研究相关的最佳实践。这种方法从许多主要研究中总结出了汇总的最佳实践和经验教训,并提高了审查的速度。从用于筛选的276项研究中,43项全文研究被评估为合格,28项被认为与完全纳入相关。结果呈现为:1)对研究人员的参与性研究建议;2)学术机构参与式研究建议。在研究参与式方法的建议背景下,出现了三个子主题:1)研究设计和规划的早期考虑;2)进行研究;3)传播和知识交流。这一快速的范围审查强调了对有兴趣在自己的研究中使用参与式方法的研究人员以及旨在支持这些实践的学术和机构利益相关者的关键建议。
{"title":"Participatory Research Emergent Recommendations for Researchers and Academic Institutions: A Rapid Scoping Review","authors":"Benjamin Scher, Juliet Scott-Barrett, M. Hickman, B. Chrisinger","doi":"10.35844/001c.74807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.74807","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, a range of academic disciplines have emphasized the potential benefits of prioritizing meaningful engagement with individuals and communities who have lived and have living experience with the topics, phenomena and problems researchers seek to study. In March 2022, we were asked to produce a paper to inform a university workshop and training materials to help students and faculty engage with participatory methods. In turn, we conducted a rapid scoping review of reviews to document key recommendations relating to methodology, logistics and ethics within the various modes of participatory research. Searches were conducted in Web of Science, SCOPUS, ProQuest, Pub Med, OVID (including Medline, PschyInfo/EMBASE, APAPsych) to identify published academic reviews (e.g., systematic, scoping, literature reviews and evidence gap maps), for best practices relating to participatory research. This approach drew out aggregated best practices and lessons learned across many primary studies and increased the speed of the review. From 276 studies imported for screening, 43 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility and 28 were deemed relevant for full inclusion. Results are presented as: 1) participatory research recommendations for researchers; and 2) participatory research recommendations for academic institutions. Three sub-themes emerged within the context of suggestions for researchers engaging with participatory methods: 1) early-stage considerations for study design and planning; 2) conducting the research; and 3) dissemination and knowledge exchange. This rapid scoping review highlights key recommendations for researchers interested in using participatory approaches in their own research, and for academic and institutional stakeholders who aim to support these practices.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41889693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Articulating Indigenous Futures: Using Target Seeking Scenario Planning in Support of Inuit-led Fisheries Governance 阐明土著人的未来:利用目标寻求情景规划支持因纽特人领导的渔业治理
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.35844/001c.77450
R. Cadman, J. Snook, Todd Broomfield, J. Goudie, Ron Johnson, Keith Watts, Aaron T. Dale, Megan Bailey
Futures thinking is an increasingly popular approach to solving complex environmental problems because it offers a framework to consider potential and desirable futures. It is also possible to create highly participatory future planning processes that incorporate the perspectives, beliefs, and values of resource users. In 2019, a group of fisheries stakeholders in Nunatsiavut, an Inuit land claim region in northern Labrador, began a target seeking scenario planning process to help them create a vision for the future of commercial fisheries in the region. Through this process, the group hoped to not only create a vision of Inuit-led fisheries but also to advance communication, collaboration, and learning for the group. In this paper, we reflect on the process we underwent over the past few years, including the research design, data collection and analysis, and the results of the project to broadly consider the strengths and weaknesses of participatory scenario planning for Indigenous governance. Reflecting on the process that we undertook provides important, experience-based knowledge for future projects. The elevation of Inuit voices makes this vision specific to the region and reframes fisheries as a tool for cultural and political rejuvenation in the region.
未来思维是解决复杂环境问题的一种越来越流行的方法,因为它提供了一个考虑潜在和理想未来的框架。还可以创建高度参与的未来规划过程,将资源用户的观点、信念和价值观纳入其中。2019年,拉布拉多北部因纽特人土地主张区努纳齐亚武特的一群渔业利益相关者开始了一个寻找目标的情景规划过程,以帮助他们为该地区商业渔业的未来创造愿景。通过这一过程,该组织不仅希望创造因纽特人领导的渔业愿景,还希望促进该组织的沟通、合作和学习。在本文中,我们回顾了过去几年我们所经历的过程,包括研究设计、数据收集和分析,以及该项目的结果,以广泛考虑参与式土著治理情景规划的优势和劣势。反思我们所进行的过程为未来的项目提供了重要的、基于经验的知识。因纽特人声音的提升使这一愿景特定于该地区,并将渔业重新定义为该地区文化和政治复兴的工具。
{"title":"Articulating Indigenous Futures: Using Target Seeking Scenario Planning in Support of Inuit-led Fisheries Governance","authors":"R. Cadman, J. Snook, Todd Broomfield, J. Goudie, Ron Johnson, Keith Watts, Aaron T. Dale, Megan Bailey","doi":"10.35844/001c.77450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.77450","url":null,"abstract":"Futures thinking is an increasingly popular approach to solving complex environmental problems because it offers a framework to consider potential and desirable futures. It is also possible to create highly participatory future planning processes that incorporate the perspectives, beliefs, and values of resource users. In 2019, a group of fisheries stakeholders in Nunatsiavut, an Inuit land claim region in northern Labrador, began a target seeking scenario planning process to help them create a vision for the future of commercial fisheries in the region. Through this process, the group hoped to not only create a vision of Inuit-led fisheries but also to advance communication, collaboration, and learning for the group. In this paper, we reflect on the process we underwent over the past few years, including the research design, data collection and analysis, and the results of the project to broadly consider the strengths and weaknesses of participatory scenario planning for Indigenous governance. Reflecting on the process that we undertook provides important, experience-based knowledge for future projects. The elevation of Inuit voices makes this vision specific to the region and reframes fisheries as a tool for cultural and political rejuvenation in the region.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44363957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Social Norms, Health Behavior, and Change Using Visually Informed Participatory Research Tools: Social Network Mapping and 2x2 Tables 评估社会规范,健康行为和改变使用视觉知情参与性研究工具:社会网络映射和2x2表
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.35844/001c.74809
Kathryn Snyder, J. R. HaileSelasse, Girija Kaimal, S. Sood
Participatory research can be used in conjunction with quantitative, other qualitative, and mixed methods research methods to collaboratively address priority global health issues that are greatly influenced by social norms. Social norms have been identified as key components of deeply held beliefs that perpetuate as well as change detrimental health practices. At all levels of global health research, from program development to monitoring and evaluation, participatory tools can be used to honor the ethic of working with the target population, incorporating their needs, and engaging a community to improve health-related behaviors. This paper shows how to use two visually based participatory tools to impact social and behavior change around Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM). Both FGM and MHM have been identified as critical to UNICEF’s Child Protection and to meeting the United Nations Global Sustainability Goals. We also outline how Social Network Mapping and 2x2 Tables were implemented to address complex social norms around FMG and MHM. The discussion then illustrates how they have been used within research and program development more broadly. These tools are valuable methods to understand and impact social and behavior change in a wide variety of public health issues.
参与性研究可与定量方法、其他定性方法和混合研究方法结合使用,共同解决受社会规范影响很大的全球优先卫生问题。社会规范已被确定为根深蒂固的信念的关键组成部分,这些信念延续并改变了有害的卫生做法。在全球卫生研究的所有层面,从规划制定到监测和评估,参与性工具都可以用来尊重与目标人群合作的道德,纳入他们的需求,并使社区参与改善与健康有关的行为。本文展示了如何使用两个基于视觉的参与性工具来影响围绕女性生殖器切割(FGM)和月经卫生管理(MHM)的社会和行为改变。女性生殖器切割和女性生殖器切割已被确定为对儿童基金会的儿童保护和实现联合国全球可持续发展目标至关重要。我们还概述了如何实现社会网络映射和2x2表来解决围绕FMG和MHM的复杂社会规范。然后,讨论说明了如何在研究和程序开发中更广泛地使用它们。这些工具是理解和影响各种公共卫生问题中的社会和行为改变的宝贵方法。
{"title":"Assessing Social Norms, Health Behavior, and Change Using Visually Informed Participatory Research Tools: Social Network Mapping and 2x2 Tables","authors":"Kathryn Snyder, J. R. HaileSelasse, Girija Kaimal, S. Sood","doi":"10.35844/001c.74809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.74809","url":null,"abstract":"Participatory research can be used in conjunction with quantitative, other qualitative, and mixed methods research methods to collaboratively address priority global health issues that are greatly influenced by social norms. Social norms have been identified as key components of deeply held beliefs that perpetuate as well as change detrimental health practices. At all levels of global health research, from program development to monitoring and evaluation, participatory tools can be used to honor the ethic of working with the target population, incorporating their needs, and engaging a community to improve health-related behaviors. This paper shows how to use two visually based participatory tools to impact social and behavior change around Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) and Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM). Both FGM and MHM have been identified as critical to UNICEF’s Child Protection and to meeting the United Nations Global Sustainability Goals. We also outline how Social Network Mapping and 2x2 Tables were implemented to address complex social norms around FMG and MHM. The discussion then illustrates how they have been used within research and program development more broadly. These tools are valuable methods to understand and impact social and behavior change in a wide variety of public health issues.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48615764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Community-Based Participatory Research: Insights, Challenges, and Successes From the Perspectives of Frontline Recruiters and Investigators 基于社区的参与式研究:从一线招聘人员和调查人员的角度看见解、挑战和成功
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.35844/001c.77399
Nita Vangeepuram, K. Fei, Crispin N. Goytia, Devin Madden, G. Corbie-Smith, C. Horowitz
Employment of community-based participatory research (CBPR) strategies has helped address limitations of traditional research approaches, but we still do not have a full understanding of how study teams successfully conduct research with populations who experience health disparities. To gain insights into the unique successes and challenges of research teams conducting National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded community-engaged research studies, we conducted an online survey with 120 investigators identified through NIH RePORTER and 106 members of the academic study team (research staff) who assisted with recruitment. We examined descriptive statistics and used Chi-square analysis to compare responses between investigators and staff. Most studies targeted low-income, racial/ethnic minority populations and reported high recruitment and retention rates. The most common collaborators were community-based organizations, and the most common study purpose was to evaluate an intervention. There was generally consensus between investigators and staff about effective recruitment and retention strategies, barriers, and facilitators. However, there were also some critical differences, including perceptions about community partner roles and the value of staff input into study design and methods. After the presentation of our key findings, we share best practices for successful recruitment and retention in health disparities research using CBPR approaches.
采用基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)策略有助于解决传统研究方法的局限性,但我们仍然不完全了解研究团队如何成功地对经历健康差异的人群进行研究。为了深入了解美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的社区参与研究的研究团队的独特成功和挑战,我们对通过NIH RePORTER确定的120名研究人员和协助招聘的106名学术研究团队成员(研究人员)进行了在线调查。我们检查了描述性统计数据,并使用卡方分析来比较调查人员和工作人员之间的反应。大多数研究都针对低收入、种族/少数民族人口,并报告了高招募率和保留率。最常见的合作者是社区组织,最常见的研究目的是评估干预措施。调查人员和工作人员对有效的招聘和留用策略、障碍和促进者达成了普遍共识。然而,也存在一些关键的差异,包括对社区伙伴角色的看法,以及工作人员对研究设计和方法投入的价值。在介绍了我们的主要发现后,我们分享了使用CBPR方法在健康差异研究中成功招募和留住人才的最佳实践。
{"title":"Community-Based Participatory Research: Insights, Challenges, and Successes From the Perspectives of Frontline Recruiters and Investigators","authors":"Nita Vangeepuram, K. Fei, Crispin N. Goytia, Devin Madden, G. Corbie-Smith, C. Horowitz","doi":"10.35844/001c.77399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.77399","url":null,"abstract":"Employment of community-based participatory research (CBPR) strategies has helped address limitations of traditional research approaches, but we still do not have a full understanding of how study teams successfully conduct research with populations who experience health disparities. To gain insights into the unique successes and challenges of research teams conducting National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded community-engaged research studies, we conducted an online survey with 120 investigators identified through NIH RePORTER and 106 members of the academic study team (research staff) who assisted with recruitment. We examined descriptive statistics and used Chi-square analysis to compare responses between investigators and staff. Most studies targeted low-income, racial/ethnic minority populations and reported high recruitment and retention rates. The most common collaborators were community-based organizations, and the most common study purpose was to evaluate an intervention. There was generally consensus between investigators and staff about effective recruitment and retention strategies, barriers, and facilitators. However, there were also some critical differences, including perceptions about community partner roles and the value of staff input into study design and methods. After the presentation of our key findings, we share best practices for successful recruitment and retention in health disparities research using CBPR approaches.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41492392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Participatory Action Research as Pedagogy: Stay Messy 参与式行动研究作为教育学:保持混乱
Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI: 10.35844/001c.75174
Julia S. Dancis, B. R. Coleman, Erin Rose Ellison
In this paper, we reflect on the use of Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a pedagogy. To do so, we first introduce PAR and review the burgeoning literature discussing PAR as a pedagogical approach at the university level. We then provide vignettes of our independent experiences as college educators facilitating PAR within undergraduate classrooms. Through our stories, we engage with the messy space between our efforts to change unjust systems and the neoliberal constraints of the academy with a chokehold on those efforts. In this narrative reflection, we examine key themes across our experiences, including: 1) relationship development as a political act; 2) the importance of emergent and responsive pedagogy; and 3) the challenges associated with prefiguring democratic practices in the classroom. Altogether, this paper grapples with the value and risk of bringing PAR into university classrooms and urges PAR educators to refrain from tidying up their pedagogy.
在本文中,我们反思了参与性行动研究(标准杆数)作为一种教育学的使用。为此,我们首先介绍了标准杆数,并回顾了关于标准杆数作为大学教学方法的新兴文献。然后,我们提供了我们作为大学教育工作者在本科生课堂上促进标准杆数的独立经验。通过我们的故事,我们了解了我们改变不公正制度的努力与学院的新自由主义限制之间的混乱空间,这些努力受到了阻碍。在这种叙事反思中,我们审视了我们经历中的关键主题,包括:1)关系发展作为一种政治行为;2) 应急和反应式教学法的重要性;以及3)与在课堂上倡导民主实践相关的挑战。总之,本文探讨了将标准杆数引入大学课堂的价值和风险,并敦促标准杆数教育工作者不要整理他们的教学法。
{"title":"Participatory Action Research as Pedagogy: Stay Messy","authors":"Julia S. Dancis, B. R. Coleman, Erin Rose Ellison","doi":"10.35844/001c.75174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.75174","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we reflect on the use of Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a pedagogy. To do so, we first introduce PAR and review the burgeoning literature discussing PAR as a pedagogical approach at the university level. We then provide vignettes of our independent experiences as college educators facilitating PAR within undergraduate classrooms. Through our stories, we engage with the messy space between our efforts to change unjust systems and the neoliberal constraints of the academy with a chokehold on those efforts. In this narrative reflection, we examine key themes across our experiences, including: 1) relationship development as a political act; 2) the importance of emergent and responsive pedagogy; and 3) the challenges associated with prefiguring democratic practices in the classroom. Altogether, this paper grapples with the value and risk of bringing PAR into university classrooms and urges PAR educators to refrain from tidying up their pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44508140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Journal of participatory research methods
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1