Journal of rare diseases (Berlin, Germany)最新文献

Background: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare approximate 1:6000 birth incidence, a genetic disease with a wide variability of physical and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Patients require lifelong care from multiple healthcare specialities, for which International and United Kingdom (UK) TSC consensus recommendations exist. Personalised care delivered by a centralised coordinated team of TSC experts is recommended. There is no such service for the estimated 600 TSC patients in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and there is a paucity of information regarding the healthcare of this group.

Purpose: Evaluate the baseline care of patients with TSC attending epilepsy services in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) against UK TSC consensus recommendations.

Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of TSC attending 12 adult and paediatric epilepsy centres in the ROI were identified. Clinical audits measured the baseline care of a subset of these patients against UK, TSC clinical recommendations. Data was anonymised and analysed at Trinity College Dublin.

Results: One hundred thirty-five TSC patients attending twelve epilepsy centres were identified. Adults (n = 67) paediatric (n = 68). The care of 83 patients was audited (n = 63 ≥ 18 years) and (n = 20 < 18 years). Many baseline tests were completed, however, they required intra or interhospital referral. Care appears fragmented and there was no evidence of formal disease surveillance plans.

Conclusions: The number of TSC patients attending epilepsy services is lower than expected (n = 135). Specialist services and treatments for TSC are available through informal referral pathways. Although UK, TSC consensus baseline recommendations are roughly adhered to, care is fragmented. Increased coordination of care could benefit disease management.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44162-024-00049-8.

A precise diagnosis in medicine allows appropriate disease-specific management. Kidney failure of unknown aetiology remains a frequent diagnostic label within the haemodialysis unit and kidney transplant clinic, accounting for 15-20% of these patients. Approximately 10% of such cases may have an underlying monogenic cause of kidney failure. Modern genetic approaches can provide a precise diagnosis for patients and their families. A search for extra-renal disease manifestations is also important as this may point to a specific genetic diagnosis. Here, we present two patients where molecular genetic testing was performed because of kidney failure of unknown aetiology and associated retinal phenotypes. The first patient reached kidney failure at 16 years of age but only presented with a retinal phenotype at 59 years of age and was found to have evidence of rod-cone dystrophy. The second patient presented with childhood kidney failure at the age of 15 years and developed visual difficulties and photophobia at the age of 32 years and was diagnosed with cone dystrophy. In both cases, genetic tests were performed which revealed a homozygous whole-gene deletion of NPHP1-encoding nephrocystin-1, providing the unifying diagnosis of Senior-Løken syndrome type 1. We conclude that reviewing kidney and extra-renal phenotypes together with targeted genetic testing was informative in these cases of kidney failure of unknown aetiology and associated retinal phenotypes. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team is advisable when managing such patients and allows referral to other relevant specialities. The long time lag and lack of diagnostic clarity and clinical evaluation in our cases should encourage genetic investigations for every young patient with unexplained kidney failure. For these and similar patients, a more timely genetic diagnosis would allow for improved management, a risk assessment of kidney disease in relatives, and the earlier identification of extra-renal disease manifestations.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44162-024-00031-4.

Alport syndrome is a genetic kidney disease that causes worsening of kidney function over time, often progressing to kidney failure. Some types of Alport syndrome cause other symptoms and signs, including hearing loss and eye abnormalities. Research now indicates that Alport syndrome (autosomal dominant inheritance) is the most common form. Alport syndrome can have X-linked or a rare form of autosomal recessive inheritance. Traditionally, a kidney biopsy was used to diagnose Alport syndrome, but genetic testing provides a more precise and less invasive means of diagnosis and reveals the underlying pattern of inheritance. At present, there are no specific curative treatments for Alport syndrome however there is a strong international effort in pursuit of future therapies. Currently, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) if a patient cannot tolerate an ACEi, slow down the progression of kidney disease and can delay the onset of kidney failure by years. There are other potential treatments in research that potentially can help delay the onset of kidney issues. Early treatment of patients and identification of their at-risk relatives is a priority. People living with Alport syndrome and their doctors now benefit from an active international research community working on translating further treatments into clinical practice and providing up-to-date clinical guidelines.

Purpose: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare, X-linked, lysosomal storage disease characterized by great variability in clinical presentation and progressive multisystemic organ damage. Lack of awareness of FD and frequent misdiagnoses cause long diagnostic delays. To address the urgent need for earlier diagnosis, we created an online, risk-assessment scoring tool, the FDrisk, for predicting an individual's risk for FD and prompting diagnostic testing and clinical evaluation.

Methods: Utilizing electronic health records, data were collected retrospectively from randomly selected, deidentified patients with FD treated at the Emory Lysosomal Storage Disease Center. Deidentified, negative controls were randomly selected from the Fabry Disease Diagnostic Testing and Education project database, a program within the American Association of Kidney Patients Center for Patient Education and Research. Diagnosis of FD was documented by evidence of a pathogenic variant in GLA and/or an abnormal level of leukocyte α-Gal A. Thirty characteristic clinical features of FD were initially identified and subsequently curated into 16 clinical covariates used as predictors for the risk of FD. An overall prediction model and two sex-specific prediction models were built. Two-hundred and sixty samples (130 cases, 130 controls) were used to train the risk prediction models. One-hundred and ninety-seven independent samples (30 cases, 167 controls) were used for testing model performance. Prediction accuracy was evaluated using a threshold of 0.5 to determine a predicted case vs. control.

Results: The overall risk prediction model demonstrated 80% sensitivity, 83.8% specificity, and positive predictive value of 47.1%. The male model demonstrated 75% sensitivity, 95.8% specificity, and positive predictive value of 75%. The female model demonstrated 83.3% sensitivity, 81.3% specificity, and positive predictive value of 45.5%. Patients with risk scores at or above 50% are categorized as "at risk" for FD and should be sent for diagnostic testing.

Conclusion: We have developed a statistical risk prediction model, the FDrisk, a validated, clinician-friendly, online, risk-assessment scoring tool for predicting an individual's risk for FD and prompting diagnostic testing and clinical evaluation. As an easily accessible, user-friendly scoring tool, we believe implementing the FDrisk will significantly decrease the time to diagnosis and allow earlier initiation of FD-specific therapy.