Journal of substance use and addiction treatment最新文献

Introduction

Low-threshold substance use treatment programs may help overcome barriers for marginalized individuals. The aims of this study were to 1) describe participant characteristics and treatment outcomes for a multi-site, Philadelphia-based mobile program providing street-based buprenorphine initiation, stabilization, and referral to ongoing care and 2) examine associations between patient characteristics and successful linkage.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving buprenorphine through Prevention Point Philadelphia's mobile overdose response program from 9/2020–12/2021. We abstracted electronic medical record data, including patient characteristics, mobile program treatment, and care linkage. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the sample and assessed the association between patient characteristics and successful care linkage using multi-variable logistic regression.

Results

Two hundred thirty-seven patients initiated buprenorphine in the program across six sites. Mean age was 46. Participants were majority men (67 %); 59 % identified as Black, 33 % identified as White, and 15 % reported Hispanic ethnicity. Most were publicly insured (74 %) and 30 % were unstably housed. Basedline engagement in primary care (32 %), psychiatric treatment (5 %), and counseling (2 %) were low. Most participants reported heroin or fentanyl use at intake (87 %), with high rates of IV drug use (37 %)., and co-occurring substance use and prior buprenorphine treatment experience were common.. 86 % completed ≥1 mobile follow-up visit, and 69 % completed ≥4 mobile program visits. 51 % of patients attended at least one visit at an outside site, and 30 % had ≥2 visits for buprenorphine prescriptions at an outside site. 35 % of the referrals were internal, meaning they went to University-based practices staffed by the mobile unit physicians. In a multivariable logistic regression model, internal referral was associated with significantly increased odds of effective care linkage (aOR 2.47, 95 % CI 1.20–5.09).

Conclusions

Targeted community outreach with low-threshold substance use care facilitated treatment access among marginalized individuals. Participants showed high levels of engagement with the mobile program, but rates of outside care linkage, while comparable to retention in other low-threshold models, were lower. The only predictor of effective care linkage was referral to brick-and-mortar clinics staffed by mobile unit physicians. These findings support the importance of outreach beyond traditional health care settings to engage high-risk patients with OUD.

Introduction

Opioid-related overdose mortality disproportionally affects Black adults in Kentucky, particularly overdoses associated with prescription opioid misuse (POM). Black adults also face other consequences of POM, such as disparate health and legal outcomes. While several factors effect POM, such as generational factors and gender, these risk factors are understudied among Black adults with a history of POM. Current literature primarily focuses on White individuals who use opioids.

Method

The present study qualitatively examined reasons for POM, prescription opioids misused, how prescription opioids are obtained, and initiation of POM among Black adults using thematic analysis. Participants included a sample (n = 39) of Black adults from a southern state, stratified by gender and age across four cohorts: born (1) 1995–2001, (2) 1980–1994, (3) 1970–1979, and (4) 1955–1969.

Results

Results revealed similarities and differences in these themes across age cohorts and gender.

Conclusions

Implications for findings include the importance of culturally responsive interventions that utilize dual diagnosis treatment and idiographic approaches due to heterogeneous experiences with POM among Black adults.

Background

The period of community re-entry following residential substance use treatment is associated with elevated risk for return to substance use. Although continuity of care is best practice, many individuals do not engage in follow-up treatment, struggle to engage in follow-up treatment, or continue to use substances while participating in follow-up treatment. There is a need to both characterize treatment engagement during community re-entry following residential substance use treatment as well as understand how treatment impacts substance use during this high-risk period.

Method

This observational study used retrospective self-report to examine treatment engagement and substance use among individuals who had exited residential substance use treatment. Participants completed a Timeline Follow-back interview reporting substance use and treatment engagement in the 30 days following residential treatment.

Results

Most participants (83.1 %) reported engaging in substance use treatment following discharge. The most common treatments were Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous (61.1 %), medication for addiction treatment (40 %), and outpatient therapy (29.2 %). Participants were less likely to use substances on a day in which they engaged in outpatient therapy (OR = 0.32, 95 % CI [0.12, 0.90], p = 0.030) and more likely on days they engaged in medication treatment (OR = 21.49, 95 % CI [1.46, 316.74], p = 0.025).

Conclusion

Findings characterize engagement in substance use treatment in the month following residential treatment. Treatment engagement was common during community re-entry; however, only outpatient therapy was found to reduce substance use during this high-risk period. Findings may inform intervention efforts during the high-risk period of community re-entry.

Introduction

There is uncertainty about whether criminal legal involvement (CLI) impacts the effectiveness of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We aimed to determine whether CLI modifies the association between buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) vs. extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) and MOUD treatment outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of X:BOT, a 24-week multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes between BUP-NX (n = 287) and XR-NTX (n = 283) in the general population. We used baseline Additional Severity-Index Lite responses to identify patients with recent CLI (n = 342), defined as active CLI and/or CLI in the past 30 days, and lifetime incarceration (n = 328). We explored recent CLI and lifetime incarceration as potential effect modifiers of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX effectiveness on relapse, induction, and overdose. We conducted both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses for each outcome.

Results

In intention-to-treat analyses, recent CLI modified the effect of BUP-NX vs. XR-NTX on odds of successful induction (p = 0.03) and hazard of overdose (p = 0.04), but it did not modify the effect on hazard of relapse (p = 0.23). All participants experienced lower odds of successful induction with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX, but the relative likelihood of successful induction with BUP-NX was lower than XR-NTX among individuals with recent CLI (OR: 0.25, 95 % CI: 0.13–0.47, p < 0.001) compared to those without recent CLI (OR: 0.04, 95 % CI: 0.01–0.19, p < 0.001). Participants with recent CLI experienced similar hazard of overdose with XR-NTX and BUP-NX (HR: 1.12, 95 % CI: 0.42–3.01, p = 0.82), whereas those without recent CLI experienced greater hazard of overdose with XR-NTX compared to BUP-NX (HR: 12.60, 95 % CI: 1.62–98.03, p = 0.02). In per-protocol analyses, recent CLI did not modify the effect of MOUD on hazard of overdose (p = 0.10) or relapse (p = 0.41). Lifetime incarceration did not modify any outcome.

Conclusions

Compared to individuals without recent CLI, individuals with recent CLI experienced decreased relative effectiveness of BUP-NX compared to XR-NTX for induction and overdose outcomes. This highlights the importance of considering the impact of recent CLI on opioid use disorder treatment outcomes. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which recent CLI modifies MOUD effectiveness and aim to improve MOUD effectiveness for individuals with recent CLI.

Introduction

Pregnant people who use substances experience significant stigma, including in healthcare settings, where physicians make high-stakes decisions about treatment plans, resource allocation, and even a person's ability to parent. Previous psychology research has demonstrated the influence of emotions on decision-making, as well as on the development and expression of stigma. Yet the specific content of physician emotions, as well as approaches to processing these emotions, has been relatively under-examined. We sought to better understand the emotional experiences of physicians who practice in safety-net labor and delivery/inpatient settings to inform strategies to facilitate more humanizing, equitable care.

Methods

From March 2021 to June 2022, the study team conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 San Francisco Bay Area-based physicians (obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, family medicine) caring for pregnant people who use substances and/or their newborns. We used deductive and inductive coding and identified themes regarding the nature, etiology, and processing of physician emotions.

Results

Physicians described experiencing a range of emotions related to interpersonal (patients, colleagues), systems-level, and internal dynamics. Emotions such as anger, sadness, frustration, and helplessness resulted from their deep care and empathy for patients, witnessing stigmatizing colleague behaviors, disagreement with punitive systems, and recognition of their own limitations in effecting change. Few participants identified strategies for processing these emotions, and several described efforts to disengage from their emotional experience to preserve their sense of well-being and professionalism.

Conclusions

Physicians caring for pregnant people who use substances and their newborns experienced intense, multi-layered emotions. This study posits that additional efforts to support physician emotional processing and structural competency could improve healthcare experiences and outcomes for pregnant people who use substances.

Introduction

Mobile health units (MHUs) provide a variety of low-barrier services to populations that face systemic barriers to healthcare access. However, MHUs are not a common delivery method for medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), and, of these, there is no consensus regarding MHU targeted objectives and outcomes. This scoping review seeks to summarize the state of the literature examining the delivery of MOUD by MHUs in the United States.

Methods

A search of PubMed, PsycInfo, and CINAHL on February 21, 2023, found 223 articles. Two authors completed title and abstract and full text reviews and extracted data relevant to intervention and study design, program objectives, and study outcomes. Ten articles fit the study's inclusion criteria (nine total interventions).

Results

Of the 10 studies, six were cohort designs, three were cross-sectional (one with qualitative interviews), and one study conducted qualitative interviews only. Most studies were located in the Northeastern United States. MHU interventions primarily aimed to provide MOUD and to retain populations in treatment. Two interventions aimed to engage patients and then transfer them to fixed-site MOUD providers. Across four interventions that provided buprenorphine, 1- and 3-month retention rates varied from 31.6 % to 72.3 % and 26.2 % to 58.5 %, respectively. Qualitative interviews found that MOUD delivery from the MHU was characterized by less stigma/judgment and greater privacy compared to fixed-site, and it was flexible and low-barrier. MHUs were reportedly underutilized by the target populations, suggesting a lack of awareness from community members with opioid use disorder.

Conclusions

MHUs that deliver MOUD are both under-provided and -utilized. Future research should continue to assess MOUD provision from MHUs with an emphasis on robust study design, application to other formulations of MOUD, and evaluation of outcomes such as participant satisfaction and key informant perceived challenges.

Registration: Submitted to Open Science Framework (OSF) Repository on February 6, 2023.

Background

Individuals in early recovery face significant biopsychosocial stressors causing a preponderance of negative affect. Novel interventions are needed to improve mood and well-being to support recovery. Positive Recovery Journaling (PRJ) combines elements of positive psychology, behavioral activation, and journaling to emphasize what is going right and to encourage small, positive steps that align with an individual's values to make life in recovery more rewarding and therefore more reinforcing. Our objective was to determine PRJ's feasibility, acceptability, and impact on a set of strengths-based, multidimensional aspects of recovery, including satisfaction with life, happiness with recovery, and commitment to sobriety.

Methods

The study randomized adults in substance-use disorder treatment (N = 81) to PRJ or control. Those in PRJ were asked to practice PRJ daily and complete online surveys for four weeks; those in the control group completed online surveys for four weeks. We used multi-level modelling to determine intercept and slope for feasibility and acceptability outcomes as well as to compare differences in recovery indicators between treatment and control at baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 8. We conducted intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses for each recovery indicator.

Results

Participants were 53 % female, and 26 % Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) and mean age of 39 years. PRJ participants attended 71 % of groups and completed 56 % of the daily PRJ entries. Treatment and control groups rated their study tasks (PRJ for the treatment group, surveys for the control group) as equally easy; however, the PRJ group rated PRJ as significantly more satisfying, helpful, and pleasant. Treatment and control were not significantly different on any recovery indicator. In post hoc analyses, we found that for those with <90 days sobriety at baseline (51 %), PRJ had a statistically significant beneficial effect for satisfaction with life, happiness with recovery, and numerous secondary recovery indicators.

Discussion

Results suggest a positive impact of PRJ on numerous recovery indices for those in earliest recovery. Integrating PRJ into support services among those with <90 days sobriety could reinforce what is going well in recovery to encourage its continued maintenance and thereby improve treatment outcomes.

Introduction

Racial and ethnic inequities persist in receipt of prenatal care, mental health services, and addiction treatment for pregnant and postpartum individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). Further qualitative work is needed to understand the intersectionality of racial and ethnic discrimination, stigma related to substance use, and gender bias on perinatal SUD care from the perspectives of affected individuals.

Methods

Peer interviewers conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with recently pregnant people of color with SUD in Massachusetts to explore the impact of internalized, interpersonal, and structural racism on prenatal, birthing, and postpartum experiences. The study used a thematic analysis to generate the codebook and double coded transcripts, with an overall kappa coefficient of 0.89. Preliminary themes were triangulated with five participants to inform final theme development.

Results

The study includes 23 participants of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds: 39% mixed race/ethnicity (including 9% with Native American ancestry), 30% Hispanic or Latinx, 26% Black/African American, 4% Asian. While participants frequently names racial and ethnic discrimination, both interpersonal and structural, as barriers to care, some participants attributed poor experiences to other marginalized identities and experiences, such as having a SUD. Three unique themes emerged from the participants' experiences: 1) Participants of color faced increased scrutiny and mistrust from clinicians and treatment programs; 2) Greater self-advocacy was required from individuals of color to counteract stereotypes and stigma; 3) Experiences related to SUD history and pregnancy status intersected with racism and gender bias to create distinct forms of discrimination.

Conclusion

Pregnant and postpartum people of color affected by perinatal SUD faced pervasive mistrust and unequal standards of care from mostly white healthcare staff and treatment spaces, which negatively impacted their treatment access, addiction medication receipt, postpartum pain management, and ability to retain custody of their children. Key clinical interventions and policy changes identified by participants for antiracist action include personalizing anesthetic plans for adequate peripartum pain control, minimizing reproductive injustices in contraceptive counseling, and addressing misuse of toxicology testing to mitigate inequitable Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement and custody loss.

Purpose

The number of women with substance use disorders (SUDs) is growing in the U.S. Many women with SUDs are of childbearing age, and studies show that women who abstain from substance use during pregnancy often relapse in the postpartum period. Given the high overlap between substance use and intimate partner violence, these women may be in relationships that make recovery more challenging. This study aimed to better understand how substance abuse coercion in intimate relationships may affect substance use and to identify and describe the presence of substance use coercion in postpartum women.

Methods

The study conducted qualitative interviews with 30 women with substance use disorders who had given birth within the past six months. Researchers recruited women from a larger intervention study providing home visit support to postpartum women in substance use recovery. Thematic analysis was then identified overarching themes in the interview data.

Results

Analysis of the impact of IPV on substance use revealed four themes: 1) sabotaging sobriety, 2) making substance use a condition of the relationship, 3) portraying her as a “bad mom,” and 4) furthering social isolation.

Conclusions

Findings showed that women with SUDs have specific vulnerabilities that partners may exploit as a way of exerting control. Implications for practice with postpartum women who are working toward recovery are discussed.

Introduction

The continuing care period following residential substance use treatment is a time when adolescents are at especially high risk for relapse, yet few families engage in traditional office-based care. Parent SMART (Substance Misuse among Adolescents in Residential Treatment) is a multi-component continuing care intervention for parents that combines three digital health technologies – an “off the shelf” online parenting program, daily phone notifications, and an online parent networking forum – with support from a parent coach. The current study solicited both qualitative and quantitative user feedback about Parent SMART to ensure responsivity to user preferences, refinement, and continuous improvement of the intervention.

Methods

Exit interviews were conducted with 30 parents who received Parent SMART, which includes (1) a parent networking forum; (2) daily text messages reminders of skills, (3) an “off-the-shelf” online parenting program; and (4) in-person or telehealth parent coaching sessions. The study collected qualitative feedback using semi-structured interviews and obtained quantitative feedback via a series of ratings of each Parent SMART component on a 5-point Likert scale administered at each follow-up assessment.

Results

Quantitative feedback suggest that parents rated all four elements of Parent SMART as easy to use. Qualitative feedback revealed that parents valued several aspects of Parent SMART including the brevity and structure of the intervention elements, the reminders to use parenting skills, and the sense of social connectedness fostered by different components. Recommended refinements included a number of strategies to enhance personalization and ease of navigation.

Conclusions

Parent feedback informed enhancements to the Parent SMART intervention prior to implementation in a larger, ongoing pragmatic effectiveness trial. The current study serves as a model for applying a staged person-centered approach and eliciting both quantitative and qualitative feedback to refine digital health technologies.