Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience最新文献

Utilizing popular press books can increase accessibility and aid in retention of marginalized groups; by increasing student engagement, improving material accessibility through real-world examples, and helping ease the financial burden of textbooks. The current article outlines how several popular press books have been successfully implemented in different levels of neuroscience coursework, including an introductory neuroscience course, a mid-level drugs and behavior course, and a senior seminar. Implementation strategies and pitfalls are discussed, including best practices for assessment and incorporation of popular press books into course material.

Education scholars have called for an increased focus on developing curricula based on culturally relevant pedagogy (Ladson-Billings, 1995). A key tenet of Ladson-Billings' (1995; 2014) theory of culturally relevant pedagogy is the development of students' sociopolitical consciousness, whereby students feel empowered and encouraged to evaluate and solve real-world interdisciplinary problems. Here, we propose that open science datasets could serve as a valuable tool for neuroscience educators to foster their students' sociopolitical consciousness. Using the open data available through the Seattle Alzheimer's Disease Brain Cell Atlas (SEA-AD) as a case study, this article will explore how open science can be leveraged as a tool to encourage socioscientific thinking amongst neuroscience students. We overview a collection of lessons created by the Allen Institute's Education & Engagement team that provides a scaffolded exploration of an open science resource through a socioscientific lens. We supplement our discussion of the lessons with feedback from students who completed the lessons during a day-long workshop hosted at the Allen Institute in Seattle, WA. We conclude by reflecting on the future role this type of interdisciplinary, open science-based approach to curricula could have across neuroscience education more broadly.

FUN Final Fridays (FFFs) are a professional development effort resulting from a pandemic-inspired virtual pedagogical meeting. Over the past three academic years, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience (FUN) has hosted FFFs as monthly professional development sessions. These sessions offer a mechanism to address current issues in higher education with emphasis on topics relevant to neuroscience educators. Broadly, topics covered in FFF sessions fall under three areas: a faculty focus that addresses issues of wellness and professional opportunity; a diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging focus that addresses how to advocate for justice through education; and a pedagogical focus that address classroom strategies and issues that affect student learning. We share here our experiences and lessons learned regarding selecting topics, identifying facilitators, navigating timing across a semester, and engaging participants with a goal of providing a framework for successful professional development so that other institutional and departmental leaders can contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of their colleagues.

Programming is a useful skill for students, both in neuroscience research and in the broader economy. Many instructors, however, may wonder how and when they should integrate it into their coursework, especially if they themselves have limited computational training. The suggestions offered here aim to help a wide range of educators - even those who have minimal coding experience - who wish to expose their students to the intersection of neuroscience and programming. Throughout, I provide examples of how I have weaved coding into various elements of neuroscience courses, even those without a computational focus. I also discuss the rich landscape of low-cost, accessible programming tools as well as how generative AI can (and should) impact the way that we are teaching programming. Ultimately, the goal is not to insist that all our students learn how to code, but rather to lower barriers and provide exposure and opportunity to any student who wishes to integrate programming into their research or careers.

Courses on the neuroscience of sex and gender can support inclusive and integrative neuroscience curricula. Developing and teaching such courses, however, can be intimidating for educators due to the subject's complexities and nuances, the increasingly politicized nature of the subject material, and the difficult conversations that the material invites. In this article we discuss how we approached the development of two undergraduate courses on sex, gender and the brain. In describing our thought process we discuss the institutional contexts for our courses and the rationale for the selected course structures, learning objectives, and content. We also describe how we fostered inclusive learning environments - particularly within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - and implemented course activities and diverse assessments aligned to the course learning objectives. We hope that readers of this article can apply our insights into developing courses on sex/gender in neuroscience at their home institutions.

In July of 2023, the Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience (FUN) held a Summer Workshop at Western Washington University. This workshop was the first in-person workshop since 2017. This article provides a brief account of the Workshop themes of inclusive pedagogy, student and faculty mindsets, integrative STEM, and decolonization of neuroscience. The presentations and events that took place were attended by a vibrant community of close to 100, who engaged fully in the discussions and social opportunities. In addition, we review the workshop planning process to guide future FUN Summer Workshop committees and hosts.

Many undergraduate neuroscience trainees aspire to earn a PhD. In recent years the number, demographics, and previous experiences of PhD applicants in neuroscience has changed. This has necessitated both a reconsideration of admissions processes to ensure equity for an increasingly diverse applicant pool as well as renewed efforts to expand access to the training and research experiences required for admission to graduate programs. Here, we describe both facets of graduate school admissions by demystifying the process and providing faculty with tools and resources to help undergraduate students successfully navigate it. We discuss admissions requirements and processes at two graduate institutions, highlighting holistic approaches to evaluating students, the ever-increasing research experience expectations, and the decreasing reliance on the GRE. With a particular focus on improving equity, diversity, inclusion and belonging, we discuss resources for applying to graduate school that are available for students from underrepresented populations, including summer institutes and fellowship programs and intentional relationships with minority serving institutions (MSIs) to foster bi-directional engagement between undergraduate programs at MSIs and graduate institutions. With diverse perspectives as faculty involved in undergraduate education, graduate programs, and post-baccalaureate training programs, we provide recommendations and resources for how to help all trainees - especially those from populations underrepresented in the STEM workforce - succeed in the current graduate education admissions landscape.

Hidden curriculum, which consists of the implicit norms and values embedded within institutions, impacts how students navigate their experiences in higher education. While the formal curriculum provides structured learning objectives and content, the hidden curriculum shapes students' socialization, sense of belonging, and access to opportunities within academic settings. For diverse students, hidden curriculum often reinforces existing power dynamics and inequities, creating additional barriers to their success. In many cases, the norms and expectations embedded within the hidden curriculum reflect dominant cultural norms, leaving students from marginalized backgrounds feeling alienated or intentionally excluded. Mentors and academic institutions play crucial roles in helping diverse students navigate the hidden curriculum of educational institutions by providing mentorship and resources to address the challenges of hidden curricula. In this paper, we introduce the importance of "NOW": 1) Nomenclature - What is Hidden Curriculum, 2) Opportunity - Opportunities to Address Hidden Curriculum in Higher Education, and 3) Willingness - Fostering an action plan for success in higher education. This paper will introduce a socioecological model for mentoring to address hidden curriculum at the individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels. At the individual and interpersonal level, we will discuss actions students and their mentors can take to develop their mentoring relationships. At the institutional level, we will identify opportunities to support diverse students and their mentors.

Core concepts, or overarching principles that identify patterns in processes and phenomena, provide a framework for organizing facts and understanding. Core concepts have existed for many years in some life science disciplines, including biology, microbiology, and physiology, yet have only recently been published for neuroscience through a multi-year community-derived project which identified the following neuroscience core concepts: Communication Modalities, Emergence, Evolution, Gene-Environment Interactions, Information Processing, Nervous System Functions, Plasticity, and Structure-Function Relationship. The current phase of the core concepts work involves two arms: utilizing and "unpacking." Work on utilization of core concepts focuses on strategies for utilizing the core concepts in courses, curricula, and assessment, and in diverse institutional contexts. The process of unpacking involves deconstructing a core concept into its key underlying components. Prior to the 2023 FUN Workshop, we consulted faculty members with relevant experience to aid in the preliminary unpacking of four core concepts (Evolution, Gene-Environment Interactions, Plasticity, and Structure-Function Relationship). The preliminary drafts of the unpacked core concepts were shared at the Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience (FUN) Workshop and Neuroscience Teaching Conference (NTC) for community feedback and guidance. This editorial describes community feedback and guidance that we received from the conferences to inform future steps.