NEJM evidence最新文献

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers are chronic, difficult to heal, and potentially life-threatening. Few medical devices have been studied in diabetic ulcers penetrating to bone or tendon.

Methods: We conducted an international, open-label randomized controlled trial, randomly assigning patients with diabetic ulcers penetrating to bone, joint, or tendon 1:1 to intact fish skin graft or standard wound care, with assigned treatment applied through 14 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of ulcers healed at 16 weeks, defined as reepithelization as identified by the investigator, and confirmed 14 days later. A blinded adjudication committee confirmed healing at both time points. Healing was also assessed at 20 and 24 weeks.

Results: Between July 2020 and November 2022, 255 patients were randomly assigned to intact fish skin graft (n=129) or standard of care (n=126). Healing was achieved in 44% of patients at 16 weeks with intact fish skin graft compared with 26% for standard of care (P<0.001, unadjusted), with additional healing at 20 weeks (46% vs. 32%) and 24 weeks (55% vs. 38%). Mean (SD) time to healing was 17.3 (0.69) weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5 to 18.7) for the intact fish skin graft group and 19.4 (0.66) weeks (95% CI, 18.1 to 20.7) for the standard of care group. In a Cox regression, intact fish skin graft was associated with faster time to healing (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.36). Primary wound infections were the most common adverse event, occurring in 39 (30.2%) of patients in the intact fish skin graft group and 31 (24.6%) of patients in the standard of care group.

Conclusions: Among patients with deep diabetic foot ulcers, treatment with intact fish skin graft was superior to standard of care in proportion of wounds healed at 16 weeks and was associated with faster time to healing. (Funded by European Commission Fast Track to Innovation Horizon 2020, and Kerecis Ltd. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04257370.).

Background: Underdiagnosis of relevant risk factors has contributed to the increasing stroke incidence in young adults. Blood pressure cut-off values for adolescents are neither sex specific nor based on cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods: This nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study included all Israeli adolescents 16-19 years of age who were medically evaluated before compulsory military service from 1985 to 2013, including routine blood pressure measurements. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of a stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) at a young age (≤52 years), as documented in the Israeli National Stroke Registry. Cox proportional hazard models were stratified by sex and adjusted for birth year, sociodemographic variables, and adolescent body mass index.

Results: The cohort comprised 1,897,048 adolescents (42.4% women). During 11,355,476 person-years of follow-up, there were 1470 first stroke events at a young age. In men, an adolescent diastolic blood pressure value of ≥80 mmHg, compared with the reference group (diastolic blood pressure value of <70 mmHg), was associated with an increased risk of stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.58), while a diastolic blood pressure value of 70-79 mmHg was not associated with an increased risk of stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.34). Among women, an adolescent diastolic blood pressure value of ≥80 mmHg, compared with the reference group (diastolic blood pressure value of <70 mmHg) was associated with an increased risk of stroke at a young age (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.88), as was a diastolic blood pressure value of 70-79 mmHg (adjusted hazard ratio 1.41; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.81). Elevated adolescent systolic blood pressure values (≥120 mmHg) were not associated with an increased risk of stroke.

Conclusions: Diastolic blood pressure values of ≥80 mmHg in adolescence were associated with an increased risk of stroke at a young age in both men and women. No similar association was observed for elevated systolic blood pressure.

AbstractMorning Report is a time-honored tradition where physicians-in-training present cases to their colleagues and clinical experts to collaboratively examine an interesting patient presentation. The Morning Report section seeks to carry on this tradition by presenting a patient's chief concern and story, inviting the reader to develop a differential diagnosis and discover the diagnosis alongside the authors of the case. This report examines the story of a 52-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with subacute abdominal pain and jaundice. Fever, worsening liver function tests, and multi-organ failure developed. Using questions, physical examination, and testing, an illness script for the presentation emerges; the differential is refined until a final diagnosis is made.

AbstractSedation practices are key to improving intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes. Adequate treatment of pain, minimization of sedation, delirium prevention, and improved patient interaction to ensure early rehabilitation and faster ventilator liberation are evidenced-based components of ICU care. Here we review components of appropriate ICU sedation including the use of multicomponent care bundles such as the ABCDEF bundle with a focus on changes in ICU practice that followed the Covid-19 pandemic.

AbstractMorning Report is a time-honored tradition where physicians-in-training present cases to their colleagues and clinical experts to collaboratively examine an interesting patient presentation. The Morning Report section seeks to carry on this tradition by presenting a patient's chief concern and story, inviting the reader to develop a differential diagnosis and discover the diagnosis alongside the authors of the case. This report examines the story of a 53-year-old man who had epigastric pain that he described as a sensation of burning behind his sternum. It persisted for months despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors. Using questions, physical examination, and testing, an illness script for the presentation emerges. As the clinical course progresses, the differential is refined until a diagnosis is made.