首页 > 最新文献

NEJM evidence最新文献

英文 中文
Minimally Invasive versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Resectable Neoplasms. 微创与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗可切除肿瘤的比较。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500045
Nine de Graaf, Anouk M L H Emmen, Marco Ramera, Jony van Hilst, Bergthor Björnsson, Ugo Boggi, Caro L Bruna, Olivier R Busch, Freek Daams, Daphne H M Droogh, Giovanni Ferrari, Sebastiaan Festen, Martina Guerra, Ignace de Hingh, Tobias Keck, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Daan J Lips, Misha D P Luyer, J Sven D Mieog, Luca Morelli, I Quintus Molenaar, Roeland F de Wilde, Mahsoem Ali, Clarissa Ferrari, Johannes Berkhof, Patrick Maisonneuve, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Marc G Besselink

Background: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) might accelerate postoperative recovery in patients with primary resectable neoplasm compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD), although the safety of MIPD remains debated. We aimed to assess whether MIPD is noninferior to OPD for overall complications and superior for time to functional recovery (TTFR).

Methods: We conducted an international, multicenter, patient-blinded randomized noninferiority trial in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for primary resectable pancreatic and periampullary neoplasm from high-volume centers. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to undergo robot-assisted or laparoscopic MIPD versus OPD and were blinded to the procedure until postoperative day 5. The primary end point was overall complications within 90 days of surgery, as measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (range 0-100, with higher scores indicating more severe complications). Noninferiority was tested using a margin of -7.5 points (one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI]; P<0.025 for noninferiority). The main secondary end point was TTFR, tested for superiority. Analyses were reported by the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: Overall, 288 patients were randomly assigned (190 MIPD [170 robot-assisted, 20 laparoscopic] and 98 OPD) in 14 centers. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 33.4±27.5 in the MIPD group versus 35.3±25.5 in the OPD group (mean difference, -1.9; 95% CI, -8.5 to 4.7; P=0.002 for nonferiority). In the MIPD group, the median TTFR was 7 days (95% CI, 6 to 8) versus 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 11) in the OPD group. The MIPD conversion rate to open surgery was 8.4%. Rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula were 22.6% versus 35.7% (relative risk 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.91) and were 12.6% versus 22.7% (relative risk 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.98) for surgical site infection after MIPD and OPD, respectively. Death by 90 days occurred in 4.7% of patients after MIPD versus 2.0% after OPD (relative risk 2.40; 95% CI, 0.51 to 11.30).

Conclusions: In patients with resectable pancreatic and periampullary neoplasm, MIPD was noninferior to OPD for 90-day overall complications (Funded by Intuitive Surgical and Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero; International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, ISRCTN27483786.).

背景:与开放式胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)相比,微创胰十二指肠切除术(MIPD)可能加速原发性可切除肿瘤患者的术后恢复,尽管MIPD的安全性仍存在争议。我们的目的是评估MIPD在总并发症方面是否不逊于OPD,在功能恢复时间(TTFR)方面是否优于OPD。方法:我们进行了一项国际、多中心、患者盲法随机非劣效性试验,研究对象是在大容量中心接受胰十二指肠切除术的原发性可切除胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤患者。患者以2:1的比例随机分配,接受机器人辅助或腹腔镜下的MIPD与OPD,直到术后第5天对该过程一无所知。主要终点是手术90天内的总并发症,使用综合并发症指数(范围0-100,分数越高表明并发症越严重)来衡量。结果:总体而言,在14个中心随机分配了288例患者(190例MIPD[170例机器人辅助,20例腹腔镜]和98例OPD)。MIPD组的平均综合并发症指数为33.4±27.5,而OPD组的平均综合并发症指数为35.3±25.5(平均差异为-1.9;95% CI为-8.5 ~ 4.7;非优等性P=0.002)。在MIPD组中,中位TTFR为7天(95% CI, 6 ~ 8),而OPD组为8天(95% CI, 7 ~ 11)。MIPD转换率为8.4%。术后胰瘘发生率分别为22.6%和35.7%(相对危险度0.63;95% CI, 0.43至0.91),MIPD和OPD术后手术部位感染发生率分别为12.6%和22.7%(相对危险度0.57;95% CI, 0.32至0.98)。在90天内死亡的MIPD患者占4.7%,而OPD患者占2.0%(相对危险度2.40;95% CI, 0.51 - 11.30)。结论:在可切除的胰腺和腹腹部周围肿瘤患者中,在90天的总并发症中,MIPD不低于OPD(由Intuitive Surgical和Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero资助;国际标准随机对照试验编号注册中心,ISRCTN27483786.)。
{"title":"Minimally Invasive versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Resectable Neoplasms.","authors":"Nine de Graaf, Anouk M L H Emmen, Marco Ramera, Jony van Hilst, Bergthor Björnsson, Ugo Boggi, Caro L Bruna, Olivier R Busch, Freek Daams, Daphne H M Droogh, Giovanni Ferrari, Sebastiaan Festen, Martina Guerra, Ignace de Hingh, Tobias Keck, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Daan J Lips, Misha D P Luyer, J Sven D Mieog, Luca Morelli, I Quintus Molenaar, Roeland F de Wilde, Mahsoem Ali, Clarissa Ferrari, Johannes Berkhof, Patrick Maisonneuve, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Marc G Besselink","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500045","DOIUrl":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500045","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) might accelerate postoperative recovery in patients with primary resectable neoplasm compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD), although the safety of MIPD remains debated. We aimed to assess whether MIPD is noninferior to OPD for overall complications and superior for time to functional recovery (TTFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an international, multicenter, patient-blinded randomized noninferiority trial in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for primary resectable pancreatic and periampullary neoplasm from high-volume centers. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to undergo robot-assisted or laparoscopic MIPD versus OPD and were blinded to the procedure until postoperative day 5. The primary end point was overall complications within 90 days of surgery, as measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (range 0-100, with higher scores indicating more severe complications). Noninferiority was tested using a margin of -7.5 points (one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI]; P<0.025 for noninferiority). The main secondary end point was TTFR, tested for superiority. Analyses were reported by the intention-to-treat principle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 288 patients were randomly assigned (190 MIPD [170 robot-assisted, 20 laparoscopic] and 98 OPD) in 14 centers. The mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 33.4±27.5 in the MIPD group versus 35.3±25.5 in the OPD group (mean difference, -1.9; 95% CI, -8.5 to 4.7; P=0.002 for nonferiority). In the MIPD group, the median TTFR was 7 days (95% CI, 6 to 8) versus 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 11) in the OPD group. The MIPD conversion rate to open surgery was 8.4%. Rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula were 22.6% versus 35.7% (relative risk 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.91) and were 12.6% versus 22.7% (relative risk 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.98) for surgical site infection after MIPD and OPD, respectively. Death by 90 days occurred in 4.7% of patients after MIPD versus 2.0% after OPD (relative risk 2.40; 95% CI, 0.51 to 11.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with resectable pancreatic and periampullary neoplasm, MIPD was noninferior to OPD for 90-day overall complications (Funded by Intuitive Surgical and Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero; International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, ISRCTN27483786.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 12","pages":"EVIDoa2500045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Progestin IUDs and Ectopic Pregnancy - A Call for Context, Not Concern. 黄体酮宫内节育器和异位妊娠-呼吁上下文,而不是关注。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500279
Marissa S Weiss, Kurt T Barnhart
{"title":"Progestin IUDs and Ectopic Pregnancy - A Call for Context, Not Concern.","authors":"Marissa S Weiss, Kurt T Barnhart","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDe2500279","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 12","pages":"EVIDe2500279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Human Challenge Trial of a Nucleoside-Modified Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Influenza Vaccine. 核苷修饰信使核糖核酸流感疫苗的人体挑战试验。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500087
Kelly A Lindert, Alex Mann, Anita Geevarughese, Teresa Hauguel, Sarah Mirza, Melissa Bevan, Kevin Yi, Kayleigh Wolfe, Pascale Nantermet, Kingsley Eze, Pratiksha Dokhe, Agnieszka M Zareba, Emily Gomme, Andrew P Catchpole, Annaliesa S Anderson, Alejandra Gurtman, Pirada Suphaphiphat Allen

Background: Human challenge trials evaluate protection from influenza exposure following vaccination but have not been reported for nucleoside-modified messenger ribonucleic acid (modRNA) influenza vaccines.

Methods: This phase 2a, double-blind trial randomly assigned healthy adults 18-55 years of age in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a modRNA or quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) 30 days before an influenza A/H1N1 challenge. Control group participants from a separate trial were exposed to the same virus but were not vaccinated. Four primary efficacy end points were used to evaluate events from day 1 to 8 postchallenge. Two end points were the percentage of participants with laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza (grade 2 or higher) and the percentage with febrile influenza (with a temperature of at least 37.9°C). Influenza end points were compared between vaccine and control groups to calculate vaccine efficacy (VE [1 minus relative risk]). Two end points were the median differences between the vaccine and control groups for the area under the viral load (VL)-time curve (VL-AUC) and for peak VL. Vaccine safety end points were examined.

Results: The per-protocol cohort included 55, 48, and 52 participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively. Symptomatic influenza occurred in 0%, 4.2%, and 26.9% of participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively, with a VE of 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.2% to 100.0%) for the modRNA vaccine and 84.5% (95% CI, 43.4% to 96.0%) for the QIV. Febrile influenza occurred in 0%, 0%, and 17.3% of participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively, with a VE of 100.0% (95% CI, 61.2% to 100.0%) for the modRNA vaccine and 100.0% (95% CI, 55.9% to 100.0%) for the QIV. The median differences in the VL-AUC between the vaccine and control groups were -88.66 for the modRNA (95% CI, -261.95 to -1.35) and -67.01 for the QIV (95% CI, -254.13 to -0.97). The median differences in peak VL between the vaccine and control groups were -4.52 for the modRNA vaccine (95% CI, -5.29 to 0.00) and -1.49 for the QIV (95% CI, -5.25 to 0.00). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Following an influenza challenge, the modRNA vaccine was associated with greater VE and reduced VL compared with the control, without any serious adverse events. (Funded by hVIVO and Pfizer; clinical trial registration number, ISRCTN13789612.).

背景:人体挑战试验评估接种后对流感暴露的保护作用,但尚未报道核苷修饰的信使核糖核酸(modRNA)流感疫苗。方法:该2a期双盲试验以1:1的比例随机分配18-55岁的健康成年人,在a /H1N1流感攻击前30天接种modRNA或四价流感疫苗(QIV)。来自另一项试验的对照组参与者暴露于同样的病毒,但没有接种疫苗。四个主要疗效终点用于评估刺激后第1天至第8天的事件。两个终点是实验室确诊的症状性流感(2级或更高)和发热性流感(体温至少37.9°C)的百分比。比较疫苗组和对照组之间的流感终点,计算疫苗效力(VE[1 -相对风险])。两个终点是疫苗组和对照组之间病毒载量(VL)时间曲线下面积(VL- auc)和峰值VL的中位数差异。检查了疫苗安全终点。结果:每个方案队列分别包括55名、48名和52名参与者,分别来自modRNA、QIV和对照组。modRNA、QIV和对照组中分别有0%、4.2%和26.9%的参与者出现症状性流感,modRNA疫苗的VE为100.0%(95%置信区间[CI], 75.2%至100.0%),QIV疫苗的VE为84.5% (95% CI, 43.4%至96.0%)。在modRNA、QIV和对照组中,发热性流感的发生率分别为0%、0%和17.3%,modRNA疫苗的VE为100.0% (95% CI, 61.2%至100.0%),QIV疫苗的VE为100.0% (95% CI, 55.9%至100.0%)。疫苗组和对照组之间的VL-AUC中位数差异modRNA为-88.66 (95% CI, -261.95至-1.35),QIV为-67.01 (95% CI, -254.13至-0.97)。modRNA疫苗和对照组之间的VL峰值中位数差异为-4.52 (95% CI, -5.29至0.00),QIV疫苗为-1.49 (95% CI, -5.25至0.00)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:在流感攻击后,与对照组相比,modRNA疫苗与更高的VE和降低的VL相关,没有任何严重的不良事件。(由hVIVO和辉瑞公司资助,临床试验注册号:ISRCTN13789612)。
{"title":"Human Challenge Trial of a Nucleoside-Modified Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Influenza Vaccine.","authors":"Kelly A Lindert, Alex Mann, Anita Geevarughese, Teresa Hauguel, Sarah Mirza, Melissa Bevan, Kevin Yi, Kayleigh Wolfe, Pascale Nantermet, Kingsley Eze, Pratiksha Dokhe, Agnieszka M Zareba, Emily Gomme, Andrew P Catchpole, Annaliesa S Anderson, Alejandra Gurtman, Pirada Suphaphiphat Allen","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500087","DOIUrl":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human challenge trials evaluate protection from influenza exposure following vaccination but have not been reported for nucleoside-modified messenger ribonucleic acid (modRNA) influenza vaccines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 2a, double-blind trial randomly assigned healthy adults 18-55 years of age in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a modRNA or quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) 30 days before an influenza A/H1N1 challenge. Control group participants from a separate trial were exposed to the same virus but were not vaccinated. Four primary efficacy end points were used to evaluate events from day 1 to 8 postchallenge. Two end points were the percentage of participants with laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza (grade 2 or higher) and the percentage with febrile influenza (with a temperature of at least 37.9°C). Influenza end points were compared between vaccine and control groups to calculate vaccine efficacy (VE [1 minus relative risk]). Two end points were the median differences between the vaccine and control groups for the area under the viral load (VL)-time curve (VL-AUC) and for peak VL. Vaccine safety end points were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The per-protocol cohort included 55, 48, and 52 participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively. Symptomatic influenza occurred in 0%, 4.2%, and 26.9% of participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively, with a VE of 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.2% to 100.0%) for the modRNA vaccine and 84.5% (95% CI, 43.4% to 96.0%) for the QIV. Febrile influenza occurred in 0%, 0%, and 17.3% of participants in the modRNA, QIV, and control groups, respectively, with a VE of 100.0% (95% CI, 61.2% to 100.0%) for the modRNA vaccine and 100.0% (95% CI, 55.9% to 100.0%) for the QIV. The median differences in the VL-AUC between the vaccine and control groups were -88.66 for the modRNA (95% CI, -261.95 to -1.35) and -67.01 for the QIV (95% CI, -254.13 to -0.97). The median differences in peak VL between the vaccine and control groups were -4.52 for the modRNA vaccine (95% CI, -5.29 to 0.00) and -1.49 for the QIV (95% CI, -5.25 to 0.00). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following an influenza challenge, the modRNA vaccine was associated with greater VE and reduced VL compared with the control, without any serious adverse events. (Funded by hVIVO and Pfizer; clinical trial registration number, ISRCTN13789612.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2500087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145558349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted Oral Peptide Icotrokinra for Psoriasis Involving High-Impact Sites. 靶向口服肽Icotrokinra治疗银屑病高影响部位。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500155
Melinda Gooderham, Edward Lain, Robert Bissonnette, Yu-Huei Huang, Charles W Lynde, Matthias Hoffmann, Eingun James Song, Oliver Weirich, Raul Hernan Gabriel Ceitlin, Jessica H Rubens, Amy M DeLozier, Takayuki Ota, Ming-Chun Hsu, Shu Li, Cynthia M C DeKlotz, Fabio Nunes, Richard B Warren

Background: Plaque psoriasis involving high-impact sites is difficult to treat. Icotrokinra, a targeted oral peptide that selectively binds interleukin-23 receptors, is a new treatment being investigated for this condition.

Methods: This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomly assigned participants 12 years of age and over with plaque psoriasis {with a body surface area ≥1%; an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥2 [clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4)] for overall skin; and at least moderate psoriasis involving the scalp, genitalia, and/or hands and feet} to receive either icotrokinra 200 mg daily or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point at week 16 was the proportion of participants achieving an overall IGA score of 0 or 1 and an improvement of 2 points or more from baseline (IGA score of 0 or 1), reported as the between-group difference adjusted for high-impact site involvement, geographic region, and body surface area category using Mantel-Haenszel weights. Absent/clear or minimal/almost clear scalp, genital, and/or hand and foot psoriasis at 16 weeks were secondary end points. Adverse events were recorded.

Results: The trial randomly assigned 311 participants (icotrokinra, n=208; placebo, n=103) with scalp (n=252: icotrokinra, n=167; placebo, n=85), genital (n=140: icotrokinra, n=98; placebo, n=42), and/or hand and foot (n=71: icotrokinra, n=48; placebo, n=23) psoriasis. The proportions of participants achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1 in the icotrokinra and placebo groups were 56.7% and 5.8%, respectively [adjusted difference, 51.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI), 42.1 to 58.8; P<0.001]. The proportions of icotrokinra-treated and placebo-treated participants achieving absence/clear or minimal/almost clear high-impact site psoriasis were as follows: scalp, 65.9% and 10.6% (difference, 55.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 44.8 to 64.4; P<0.001); genitalia, 76.5% and 21.4% (difference, 55.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 39.1 to 68.0; P<0.001); and hand and foot, 41.7% and 26.1% (difference, 16.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.2 to 36.8; P=0.144). Adverse events occurred among 50% and 42% of participants in the icotrokinra and placebo groups, respectively.

Conclusions: At 16 weeks, significantly higher proportions of participants 12 years of age and over with at least moderate psoriasis involving high-impact sites treated with icotrokinra versus placebo achieved clearance or minimal psoriasis in their skin overall and in the scalp and genital areas, but not in their hands and feet. No safety signals were identified. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06095102.).

背景:涉及高冲击部位的斑块性银屑病很难治疗。Icotrokinra是一种选择性结合白介素-23受体的靶向口服肽,是一种正在研究的治疗这种疾病的新方法。方法:这是一项3期、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,随机分配12岁及以上的斑块型银屑病患者(体表面积≥1%;整体皮肤的研究者整体评估(IGA)评分≥2[明确(0)、最低(1)、轻度(2)、中度(3)和重度(4)];至少中度牛皮癣,包括头皮,生殖器,和/或手和脚,每天服用200毫克的icotrokinra或安慰剂,比例为2:1。第16周的主要终点是达到总体IGA评分为0或1,并且从基线(IGA评分为0或1)改善2分或更多的参与者比例,报告为使用Mantel-Haenszel权重调整高影响部位受累、地理区域和体表面积类别的组间差异。16周时头皮、生殖器和/或手足牛皮癣未见/清除或极少/几乎清除是次要终点。记录不良事件。结果:试验随机分配311名参与者(icotrokinra, n=208;安慰剂,n=103),头皮(n=252: icotrokinra, n=167;安慰剂,n=85),生殖器(n=140: icotrokinra, n=98;安慰剂,n=42),和/或手脚(n=71: icotrokinra, n=48;安慰剂,n=23)牛皮癣。在icotrokinra组和安慰剂组中,IGA得分为0或1的参与者比例分别为56.7%和5.8%[调整后的差异,51.1个百分点;95%置信区间(CI)为42.1 ~ 58.8;结论:在16周时,与安慰剂相比,接受icotrokinra治疗的12岁及以上的至少中度牛皮癣患者的比例明显更高,这些患者涉及高影响部位,他们的皮肤、头皮和生殖器区域的牛皮癣得到清除或减轻,但手和脚没有。没有发现任何安全信号。(由强生公司资助;ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT06095102)。
{"title":"Targeted Oral Peptide Icotrokinra for Psoriasis Involving High-Impact Sites.","authors":"Melinda Gooderham, Edward Lain, Robert Bissonnette, Yu-Huei Huang, Charles W Lynde, Matthias Hoffmann, Eingun James Song, Oliver Weirich, Raul Hernan Gabriel Ceitlin, Jessica H Rubens, Amy M DeLozier, Takayuki Ota, Ming-Chun Hsu, Shu Li, Cynthia M C DeKlotz, Fabio Nunes, Richard B Warren","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500155","DOIUrl":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plaque psoriasis involving high-impact sites is difficult to treat. Icotrokinra, a targeted oral peptide that selectively binds interleukin-23 receptors, is a new treatment being investigated for this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomly assigned participants 12 years of age and over with plaque psoriasis {with a body surface area ≥1%; an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥2 [clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4)] for overall skin; and at least moderate psoriasis involving the scalp, genitalia, and/or hands and feet} to receive either icotrokinra 200 mg daily or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point at week 16 was the proportion of participants achieving an overall IGA score of 0 or 1 and an improvement of 2 points or more from baseline (IGA score of 0 or 1), reported as the between-group difference adjusted for high-impact site involvement, geographic region, and body surface area category using Mantel-Haenszel weights. Absent/clear or minimal/almost clear scalp, genital, and/or hand and foot psoriasis at 16 weeks were secondary end points. Adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial randomly assigned 311 participants (icotrokinra, n=208; placebo, n=103) with scalp (n=252: icotrokinra, n=167; placebo, n=85), genital (n=140: icotrokinra, n=98; placebo, n=42), and/or hand and foot (n=71: icotrokinra, n=48; placebo, n=23) psoriasis. The proportions of participants achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1 in the icotrokinra and placebo groups were 56.7% and 5.8%, respectively [adjusted difference, 51.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI), 42.1 to 58.8; P<0.001]. The proportions of icotrokinra-treated and placebo-treated participants achieving absence/clear or minimal/almost clear high-impact site psoriasis were as follows: scalp, 65.9% and 10.6% (difference, 55.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 44.8 to 64.4; P<0.001); genitalia, 76.5% and 21.4% (difference, 55.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 39.1 to 68.0; P<0.001); and hand and foot, 41.7% and 26.1% (difference, 16.7 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.2 to 36.8; P=0.144). Adverse events occurred among 50% and 42% of participants in the icotrokinra and placebo groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 16 weeks, significantly higher proportions of participants 12 years of age and over with at least moderate psoriasis involving high-impact sites treated with icotrokinra versus placebo achieved clearance or minimal psoriasis in their skin overall and in the scalp and genital areas, but not in their hands and feet. No safety signals were identified. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06095102.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2500155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145454160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oral Psoriasis Therapy - For Whom and at What Cost and Risk? 口腔牛皮癣治疗-针对谁,成本和风险是多少?
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500282
Robert S Stern
{"title":"Oral Psoriasis Therapy - For Whom and at What Cost and Risk?","authors":"Robert S Stern","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500282","DOIUrl":"10.1056/EVIDe2500282","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDe2500282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145454207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. 成人社区获得性肺炎。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDra2500170
Anthony D Bai, Mark Loeb

AbstractIn the United States, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is estimated to be responsible for 1.2 million emergency department visits and 41,210 deaths annually. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, microbiology, diagnosis, microbiologic testing, pharmacotherapy, and long-term adverse health outcomes for CAP in adults.

在美国,社区获得性肺炎(CAP)估计每年导致120万急诊就诊和41,210例死亡。本文综述了成人CAP的流行病学、病理生理学、微生物学、诊断、微生物学检测、药物治疗和长期不良健康结局。
{"title":"Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.","authors":"Anthony D Bai, Mark Loeb","doi":"10.1056/EVIDra2500170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDra2500170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractIn the United States, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is estimated to be responsible for 1.2 million emergency department visits and 41,210 deaths annually. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, microbiology, diagnosis, microbiologic testing, pharmacotherapy, and long-term adverse health outcomes for CAP in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 12","pages":"EVIDra2500170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating Treatment Effects with Patient-Response-Related Outcomes in Comparative Clinical Trials. 比较临床试验中以患者反应相关结局评价治疗效果。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDctw2400349
Lu Mao, Lu Tian, Bo Huang, Paul G Richardson, Ethan B Ludmir, Michael D Hughes, Lee-Jen Wei

AbstractIn comparative clinical investigations for nearly all disease types, patient responses - signifying clinically meaningful improvements in health or reductions in disease burden - are routinely employed as key end points for assessing treatment activity or efficacy. Trials typically use the response rate to summarize treatment effects, a metric with limitations for investigating the temporal profile of the effect. In this Clinical Trials Workshop, the authors present a novel approach for analyzing time to response and duration of response in clinical trials using, as an example, data from the JAVELIN Renal-101 trial of avelumab and axitinib versus sunitinib for treating renal cell carcinoma.

在几乎所有疾病类型的比较临床研究中,患者反应-意味着临床有意义的健康改善或疾病负担减轻-通常被用作评估治疗活性或疗效的关键终点。试验通常使用反应率来总结治疗效果,这是一个在调查效果的时间概况时具有局限性的度量。在本次临床试验研讨会上,作者提出了一种分析临床试验中反应时间和反应持续时间的新方法,以JAVELIN肾-101试验的数据为例,该试验是阿维单抗和阿西替尼与舒尼替尼治疗肾细胞癌。
{"title":"Evaluating Treatment Effects with Patient-Response-Related Outcomes in Comparative Clinical Trials.","authors":"Lu Mao, Lu Tian, Bo Huang, Paul G Richardson, Ethan B Ludmir, Michael D Hughes, Lee-Jen Wei","doi":"10.1056/EVIDctw2400349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDctw2400349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractIn comparative clinical investigations for nearly all disease types, patient responses - signifying clinically meaningful improvements in health or reductions in disease burden - are routinely employed as key end points for assessing treatment activity or efficacy. Trials typically use the response rate to summarize treatment effects, a metric with limitations for investigating the temporal profile of the effect. In this Clinical Trials Workshop, the authors present a novel approach for analyzing time to response and duration of response in clinical trials using, as an example, data from the JAVELIN Renal-101 trial of avelumab and axitinib versus sunitinib for treating renal cell carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 12","pages":"EVIDctw2400349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy - Safety First. 微创胰十二指肠切除术-安全第一。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500224
Rachel H Joung, Rebecca A Snyder
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy - Safety First.","authors":"Rachel H Joung, Rebecca A Snyder","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDe2500224","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 12","pages":"EVIDe2500224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intrauterine Devices and Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy. 宫内节育器与异位妊娠的风险。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-25 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500117
Noémie Roland, Epiphane Kolla, Lorraine Poncet, Pauline Dayani, Lise Duranteau, Rosemary Dray-Spira, Alain Weill, Mahmoud Zureik

Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are effective contraceptives but are also associated with a higher ectopic pregnancy risk than other contraceptive methods. This study assessed ectopic pregnancy risk with varying hormonal IUD dosages compared with copper IUDs.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study using data from the French National Healthcare Data System (SNDS) and identified first-time IUD dispensations from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was ectopic pregnancy occurrence within 1 year of the index date, set 1 month post IUD dispensing. We used propensity score-based weighting and Cox regression analysis to compare ectopic pregnancy risk among users of levonorgestrel 13.5-mg, 19.5-mg, and 52-mg IUDs versus copper IUDs.

Results: Between 2018 and 2022, 45,450 women received a levonorgestrel 13.5-mg IUD, 212,301 received a levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD, 244,871 received a levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD, and 1,033,505 received a copper IUD. The mean age (standard deviation) was 26.8 (7.8), 29.7 (8.1), and 35.2 (8.2) years among levonorgestrel 13.5-mg, 19.5-mg, and 52-mg IUD users, respectively, and 29.1 (6.9) years in copper IUD users. At 1 year, ectopic pregnancy occurred in 71 levonorgestrel 13.5-mg IUD users (incidence rate, 0.18 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.23), 182 levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD users (incidence rate, 0.10 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.11), 88 levonorgestrel 52-mg users (incidence rate, 0.04 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.05), and 682 copper IUD users (incidence rate, 0.07 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.08). Compared with copper IUD users, the hazard ratios for ectopic pregnancy with hormonal IUDs were 2.57 (95% CI, 1.92 to 3.43) for 13.5-mg users, 1.37 (95% CI, 1.15 to 1.62) for 19.5-mg users, and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.80) for 52-mg users.

Conclusions: In this nationwide cohort study comparing three doses of hormonal IUDs and copper IUDs, the highest dose (levonorgestrel 52 mg) was associated with the lowest risk of ectopic pregnancy within 1 year compared with copper IUDs, whereas the 13.5-mg hormonal IUD was associated with the highest risk. (Funded by the French National Fund for Health Insurance and the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety.).

背景:宫内节育器(iud)是一种有效的避孕方法,但与其他避孕方法相比,宫外孕的风险更高。本研究评估了不同激素宫内节育器剂量与铜宫内节育器的异位妊娠风险。方法:我们使用法国国家医疗保健数据系统(SNDS)的数据进行了一项全国性队列研究,并确定了2018年至2022年首次使用宫内节育器的情况。主要结局为指标日期后1年内异位妊娠的发生,设定为宫内节育器配药后1个月。我们使用基于倾向评分的加权和Cox回归分析来比较左炔诺孕酮13.5 mg、19.5 mg和52 mg宫内节育器使用者与铜宫内节育器使用者的异位妊娠风险。结果:2018年至2022年期间,45450名妇女接受了左炔诺孕酮13.5 mg宫内节育器,212301名妇女接受了左炔诺孕酮19.5 mg宫内节育器,244871名妇女接受了左炔诺孕酮52 mg宫内节育器,1033505名妇女接受了铜宫内节育器。左炔诺孕酮13.5 mg、19.5 mg和52 mg宫内节育器使用者的平均年龄(标准差)分别为26.8(7.8)、29.7(8.1)和35.2(8.2)岁,铜宫内节育器使用者的平均年龄(标准差)为29.1(6.9)岁。1年后,71名左炔诺孕酮13.5 mg宫内节育器使用者(发病率,0.18 / 100人-年;95%可信区间[CI], 0.14 - 0.23)、182名左炔诺孕酮19.5 mg宫内节育器使用者(发病率,0.10 / 100人-年;95% CI, 0.08 - 0.11)、88名左炔诺孕酮52 mg使用者(发病率,0.04 / 100人-年;95% CI, 0.03 - 0.05)和682名铜宫内节育器使用者(发病率,0.07 / 100人-年;95% CI, 0.07 - 0.08)发生异位妊娠。与铜宫内节育器使用者相比,使用激素宫内节育器发生异位妊娠的风险比为:13.5 mg使用者为2.57 (95% CI, 1.92 - 3.43), 19.5 mg使用者为1.37 (95% CI, 1.15 - 1.62), 52 mg使用者为0.62 (95% CI, 0.49 - 0.80)。结论:在这项比较三种剂量的激素宫内节育器和铜宫内节育器的全国性队列研究中,与铜宫内节育器相比,最高剂量(左炔诺孕酮52 mg)与1年内异位妊娠的风险最低,而13.5 mg激素宫内节育器与最高风险相关。(由法国国家健康保险基金和法国国家药品和保健产品安全局提供资金。)
{"title":"Intrauterine Devices and Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy.","authors":"Noémie Roland, Epiphane Kolla, Lorraine Poncet, Pauline Dayani, Lise Duranteau, Rosemary Dray-Spira, Alain Weill, Mahmoud Zureik","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2500117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are effective contraceptives but are also associated with a higher ectopic pregnancy risk than other contraceptive methods. This study assessed ectopic pregnancy risk with varying hormonal IUD dosages compared with copper IUDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cohort study using data from the French National Healthcare Data System (SNDS) and identified first-time IUD dispensations from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was ectopic pregnancy occurrence within 1 year of the index date, set 1 month post IUD dispensing. We used propensity score-based weighting and Cox regression analysis to compare ectopic pregnancy risk among users of levonorgestrel 13.5-mg, 19.5-mg, and 52-mg IUDs versus copper IUDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2018 and 2022, 45,450 women received a levonorgestrel 13.5-mg IUD, 212,301 received a levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD, 244,871 received a levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD, and 1,033,505 received a copper IUD. The mean age (standard deviation) was 26.8 (7.8), 29.7 (8.1), and 35.2 (8.2) years among levonorgestrel 13.5-mg, 19.5-mg, and 52-mg IUD users, respectively, and 29.1 (6.9) years in copper IUD users. At 1 year, ectopic pregnancy occurred in 71 levonorgestrel 13.5-mg IUD users (incidence rate, 0.18 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.23), 182 levonorgestrel 19.5-mg IUD users (incidence rate, 0.10 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.11), 88 levonorgestrel 52-mg users (incidence rate, 0.04 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.05), and 682 copper IUD users (incidence rate, 0.07 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.08). Compared with copper IUD users, the hazard ratios for ectopic pregnancy with hormonal IUDs were 2.57 (95% CI, 1.92 to 3.43) for 13.5-mg users, 1.37 (95% CI, 1.15 to 1.62) for 19.5-mg users, and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.80) for 52-mg users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this nationwide cohort study comparing three doses of hormonal IUDs and copper IUDs, the highest dose (levonorgestrel 52 mg) was associated with the lowest risk of ectopic pregnancy within 1 year compared with copper IUDs, whereas the 13.5-mg hormonal IUD was associated with the highest risk. (Funded by the French National Fund for Health Insurance and the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 12","pages":"EVIDoa2500117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145607955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Kidney to Heart - and Beyond - SGLT2 Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease. 慢性肾脏疾病中的SGLT2抑制剂从肾脏到心脏及其他部位。
Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1056/EVIDe2500255
Priya Vart
{"title":"From Kidney to Heart - and Beyond - SGLT2 Inhibitors in Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Priya Vart","doi":"10.1056/EVIDe2500255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDe2500255","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 11","pages":"EVIDe2500255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145380070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
NEJM evidence
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1