首页 > 最新文献

Observational studies最新文献

英文 中文
The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies 倾向评分在匹配观察性研究敏感性分析中的核心作用
Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0002
Siyu Heng
Abstract:The propensity score, which was originally introduced in Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), has been widely considered one of the most important concepts in the causal inference literature. This article briefly reviews some propensity score models involving both observed and unobserved covariates and discusses their applications in sensitivity analysis for matched observational studies.
摘要:倾向得分最初是在Rosenbaum和Rubin(1983)中提出的,在因果推理文献中被广泛认为是最重要的概念之一。本文简要回顾了一些涉及观察到和未观察到协变量的倾向评分模型,并讨论了它们在匹配观察研究的敏感性分析中的应用。
{"title":"The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies","authors":"Siyu Heng","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The propensity score, which was originally introduced in Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), has been widely considered one of the most important concepts in the causal inference literature. This article briefly reviews some propensity score models involving both observed and unobserved covariates and discusses their applications in sensitivity analysis for matched observational studies.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45075047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on Rubin and Rosenbaum Seminal 1983 Paper on Propensity Scores: From Then to Now 鲁宾和罗森鲍姆1983年关于倾向得分的开创性论文:从那时到现在
Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0000
Usha Govindarajulu
Abstract:Rubin and Rosenbaum (1983) wrote about the theory and application of “propensity scores” in their landmark paper. Since that time, the method has still been in use or adapted for use in various contexts. In this commentary, I discuss their original paper and the latest in terms of criticisms and defense of the use of some of the theory they proposed for propensity score matching. Although the commentary is not exhaustive, I try to highlight important aspects of their theory as well as points made later for and against some of their originally proposed theory.
摘要:Rubin和Rosenbaum(1983)在他们的里程碑式论文中写到了“倾向得分”的理论和应用。从那时起,该方法仍在使用或适用于各种情况。在这篇评论中,我讨论了他们的原始论文和最新论文,对他们提出的倾向得分匹配理论的使用进行了批评和辩护。尽管评论并不详尽,但我试图强调他们理论的重要方面,以及后来支持和反对他们最初提出的一些理论的观点。
{"title":"Commentary on Rubin and Rosenbaum Seminal 1983 Paper on Propensity Scores: From Then to Now","authors":"Usha Govindarajulu","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0000","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0000","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Rubin and Rosenbaum (1983) wrote about the theory and application of “propensity scores” in their landmark paper. Since that time, the method has still been in use or adapted for use in various contexts. In this commentary, I discuss their original paper and the latest in terms of criticisms and defense of the use of some of the theory they proposed for propensity score matching. Although the commentary is not exhaustive, I try to highlight important aspects of their theory as well as points made later for and against some of their originally proposed theory.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46521470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging the design and modeling of causal inference: A Bayesian nonparametric perspective 连接因果推理的设计和建模:贝叶斯非参数视角
Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0012
Xinyi Xu, S. MacEachern, Bo Lu
Abstract:In their seminal paper first published 40 years ago, Rosenbaum and Rubin crafted the concept of the propensity score to tackle the challenging problem of causal inference in observational studies. The propensity score is set up mostly as a design tool to recreate a randomization like scenario, through matching or subclassification. Bayesian development over the past two decades has adopted a modeling framework to infer the causal effect. In this commentary, we highlight the connection between the design- and model-based perspectives to analysis. We briefly review a Bayesian nonparametric framework that utilizes Gaussian Process models on propensity scores to mimic matched designs. We also discuss the role of variation as well as bias in estimators arising from observational data.
摘要:在40年前首次发表的开创性论文中,Rosenbaum和Rubin提出了倾向得分的概念,以解决观察性研究中具有挑战性的因果推断问题。倾向得分主要是作为一种设计工具来设置的,通过匹配或子类化来重新创建类似随机化的场景。贝叶斯在过去二十年的发展中采用了一个建模框架来推断因果效应。在这篇评论中,我们强调了设计和基于模型的视角与分析之间的联系。我们简要回顾了一个贝叶斯非参数框架,该框架利用倾向得分的高斯过程模型来模拟匹配设计。我们还讨论了观测数据中估计量的变化和偏差的作用。
{"title":"Bridging the design and modeling of causal inference: A Bayesian nonparametric perspective","authors":"Xinyi Xu, S. MacEachern, Bo Lu","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0012","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In their seminal paper first published 40 years ago, Rosenbaum and Rubin crafted the concept of the propensity score to tackle the challenging problem of causal inference in observational studies. The propensity score is set up mostly as a design tool to recreate a randomization like scenario, through matching or subclassification. Bayesian development over the past two decades has adopted a modeling framework to infer the causal effect. In this commentary, we highlight the connection between the design- and model-based perspectives to analysis. We briefly review a Bayesian nonparametric framework that utilizes Gaussian Process models on propensity scores to mimic matched designs. We also discuss the role of variation as well as bias in estimators arising from observational data.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47614346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Uses of Propensity Scores in Randomized Controlled Trials 倾向性评分在随机对照试验中的应用
Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0007
T. Loux, Yi Huang
Abstract:Propensity scores are a dimension-reduction technique used to quantify the differences between treatment groups. Though propensity scores were developed to address the issue of confounding in observational studies, they have also proven useful in randomized controlled trials where confounding is structurally absent. When applied to randomized controlled trials, propensity scores can ensure balance between groups at the time of randomization, account for chance imbalances in observed randomization, and generalize target results to target populations. In this article, we review propensity score methodology developed for randomized trials with these goals.
摘要:倾向评分是一种降维技术,用于量化治疗组之间的差异。尽管倾向评分是为了解决观察性研究中的混杂问题而制定的,但在结构上不存在混杂的随机对照试验中,它们也被证明是有用的。当应用于随机对照试验时,倾向评分可以确保随机化时各组之间的平衡,解释观察到的随机化中的机会失衡,并将目标结果推广到目标人群。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了为这些目标的随机试验开发的倾向评分方法。
{"title":"The Uses of Propensity Scores in Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"T. Loux, Yi Huang","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Propensity scores are a dimension-reduction technique used to quantify the differences between treatment groups. Though propensity scores were developed to address the issue of confounding in observational studies, they have also proven useful in randomized controlled trials where confounding is structurally absent. When applied to randomized controlled trials, propensity scores can ensure balance between groups at the time of randomization, account for chance imbalances in observed randomization, and generalize target results to target populations. In this article, we review propensity score methodology developed for randomized trials with these goals.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48717518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Pursuit of Efficiency versus Robustness: A Learning Experience from Analyzing a Semiparametric Nonignorable Propensity Score Model 追求效率与稳健性:一个半参数不可忽略倾向评分模型的学习经验分析
Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0009
Samidha Shetty, Yanyuan Ma, Jiwei Zhao
Abstract:Rosenbaum and Rubin’s pioneering work on “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects” has shaped the landscape of the literature in causal inference and missing data analysis. In the past decades, the concept of propensity score has been used not only under ignorability assumption, but also under nonignorability assumption. The nice properties of double robustness and semiparametric efficiency are well known under ignorability; however, the situation is a lot more sophisticated under nonignorability. In this paper, we summarize what we have learnt from analyzing a semi-parametric nonignorable propensity score model. It turns out that, under nonignorability, the efficient estimator for the quantity of interest might be too complicated to be practically implemented. On the other hand, by sacrificing the efficiency to some extent, one type of robust estimators is much easier to derive and implement; hence is recommended. This is a general tradeoff between efficiency and robustness in a typical semiparametric model.
摘要:Rosenbaum和Rubin在“因果效应观察研究中倾向得分的核心作用”方面的开创性工作塑造了因果推理和缺失数据分析的文献景观。在过去的几十年里,倾向分数的概念不仅在可忽略性假设下使用,而且在不可忽略性假设下使用。在可忽略性条件下,双鲁棒性和半参数效率的良好性质是众所周知的;然而,在不可忽略性下,情况要复杂得多。在本文中,我们总结了我们从分析半参数不可忽略倾向得分模型中学到的东西。结果表明,在不可忽略性条件下,对兴趣量的有效估计可能过于复杂而难以实际实现。另一方面,在一定程度上牺牲效率的前提下,一类鲁棒估计器更容易推导和实现;因此被推荐。在典型的半参数模型中,这是效率和鲁棒性之间的一般权衡。
{"title":"The Pursuit of Efficiency versus Robustness: A Learning Experience from Analyzing a Semiparametric Nonignorable Propensity Score Model","authors":"Samidha Shetty, Yanyuan Ma, Jiwei Zhao","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Rosenbaum and Rubin’s pioneering work on “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects” has shaped the landscape of the literature in causal inference and missing data analysis. In the past decades, the concept of propensity score has been used not only under ignorability assumption, but also under nonignorability assumption. The nice properties of double robustness and semiparametric efficiency are well known under ignorability; however, the situation is a lot more sophisticated under nonignorability. In this paper, we summarize what we have learnt from analyzing a semi-parametric nonignorable propensity score model. It turns out that, under nonignorability, the efficient estimator for the quantity of interest might be too complicated to be practically implemented. On the other hand, by sacrificing the efficiency to some extent, one type of robust estimators is much easier to derive and implement; hence is recommended. This is a general tradeoff between efficiency and robustness in a typical semiparametric model.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44169085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RobustIV and controlfunctionIV: Causal Inference for Linear and Nonlinear Models with Invalid Instrumental Variables 鲁棒性IV和控制函数IV:具有无效工具变量的线性和非线性模型的因果推理
Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.a906625
Taehyeon Koo, Youjin Lee, Dylan S. Small, Zijian Guo
Abstract:We present R software packages RobustIV and controlfunctionIV for causal inference with possibly invalid instrumental variables. RobustIV focuses on the linear outcome model. It implements the two-stage hard thresholding method to select valid instrumental variables from a set of candidate instrumental variables and make inferences for the causal effect in both low- and high-dimensional settings. Furthermore, RobustIV implements the high-dimensional endogeneity test and the searching and sampling method, a uniformly valid inference method robust to errors in instrumental variable selection. controlfunctionIV considers the nonlinear outcome model and makes inferences about the causal effect based on the control function method. Our packages are demonstrated using two publicly available economic data sets together with applications to the Framingham Heart Study.
摘要:我们提出了R软件包roubustiv和controlfunctionIV,用于可能无效的工具变量的因果推理。鲁棒性视觉主要关注线性结果模型。它实现了两阶段硬阈值法,从一组候选工具变量中选择有效的工具变量,并对低维和高维设置中的因果关系进行推断。此外,roubustiv实现了高维内生性检验和搜索抽样方法,这是一种对工具变量选择误差具有鲁棒性的一致有效的推理方法。controlfunctionIV考虑非线性结果模型,基于控制函数法对因果关系进行推断。我们的软件包使用两个公开可用的经济数据集以及弗雷明汉心脏研究的应用程序进行演示。
{"title":"RobustIV and controlfunctionIV: Causal Inference for Linear and Nonlinear Models with Invalid Instrumental Variables","authors":"Taehyeon Koo, Youjin Lee, Dylan S. Small, Zijian Guo","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.a906625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.a906625","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We present R software packages RobustIV and controlfunctionIV for causal inference with possibly invalid instrumental variables. RobustIV focuses on the linear outcome model. It implements the two-stage hard thresholding method to select valid instrumental variables from a set of candidate instrumental variables and make inferences for the causal effect in both low- and high-dimensional settings. Furthermore, RobustIV implements the high-dimensional endogeneity test and the searching and sampling method, a uniformly valid inference method robust to errors in instrumental variable selection. controlfunctionIV considers the nonlinear outcome model and makes inferences about the causal effect based on the control function method. Our packages are demonstrated using two publicly available economic data sets together with applications to the Framingham Heart Study.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45733657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Using Pilot Data for Power Analysis of Observational Studies for the Estimation of Dynamic Treatment Regimes. 使用试点数据进行观测研究的功率分析以估计动态治疗方案
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.a906627
Eric J Rose, Erica E M Moodie, Susan Shortreed

Significant attention has been given to developing data-driven methods for tailoring patient care based on individual patient characteristics. Dynamic treatment regimes formalize this approach through a sequence of decision rules that map patient information to a suggested treatment. The data for estimating and evaluating treatment regimes are ideally gathered through the use of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs), though longitudinal observational studies are commonly used due to the potentially prohibitive costs of conducting a SMART. Observational studies are typically powered for simple comparisons of fixed treatment sequences; a priori power or sample size calculations for tailored strategies are rarely if ever undertaken. This has lead to many studies that fail to find a statistically significant benefit to tailoring treatment. We develop power analyses for the estimation of dynamic treatment regimes from observational studies. Our approach uses pilot data to estimate the power for comparing the value of the optimal regime, i.e., the expected outcome if all patients in the population were treated by following the optimal regime, with a known comparison mean. This allows for calculations that ensure a study has sufficient power to detect the need for tailoring, should it be present. Our approach also ensures the value of the estimated optimal treatment regime has a high probability of being within a range of the value of the true optimal regime, set a priori. We examine the performance of the proposed procedure with a simulation study and use it to size a study for reducing depressive symptoms using data from electronic health records.

摘要:开发基于个体患者特征的数据驱动方法来定制患者护理受到了极大的关注。动态治疗方案通过一系列将患者信息映射到建议治疗的决策规则将这种方法形式化。用于估计和评估治疗方案的数据最好通过使用顺序多任务随机试验(SMARTs)收集,尽管由于进行SMART的潜在过高成本,通常使用纵向观察性研究。观察性研究通常用于固定治疗顺序的简单比较;对于量身定制的策略,很少进行先验幂或样本大小计算。这导致许多研究未能发现定制治疗在统计上的显著益处。我们对观察性研究的动态治疗方案进行了功率分析。我们的方法使用试点数据来估计比较最优方案值的功率,即,如果人群中的所有患者都按照最优方案进行治疗,并具有已知的比较平均值,则预期结果。这允许计算,以确保研究有足够的能力来检测裁剪的需要,如果它存在的话。我们的方法还确保估计的最优治疗方案的值有很高的概率在真正的最优方案的值范围内,先验设置。我们通过一项模拟研究来检验所建议的程序的性能,并利用电子健康记录的数据来确定减少抑郁症状的研究的规模。
{"title":"Using Pilot Data for Power Analysis of Observational Studies for the Estimation of Dynamic Treatment Regimes.","authors":"Eric J Rose, Erica E M Moodie, Susan Shortreed","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.a906627","DOIUrl":"10.1353/obs.2023.a906627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Significant attention has been given to developing data-driven methods for tailoring patient care based on individual patient characteristics. Dynamic treatment regimes formalize this approach through a sequence of decision rules that map patient information to a suggested treatment. The data for estimating and evaluating treatment regimes are ideally gathered through the use of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs), though longitudinal observational studies are commonly used due to the potentially prohibitive costs of conducting a SMART. Observational studies are typically powered for simple comparisons of fixed treatment sequences; a priori power or sample size calculations for tailored strategies are rarely if ever undertaken. This has lead to many studies that fail to find a statistically significant benefit to tailoring treatment. We develop power analyses for the estimation of dynamic treatment regimes from observational studies. Our approach uses pilot data to estimate the power for comparing the value of the optimal regime, i.e., the expected outcome if all patients in the population were treated by following the optimal regime, with a known comparison mean. This allows for calculations that ensure a study has sufficient power to detect the need for tailoring, should it be present. Our approach also ensures the value of the estimated optimal treatment regime has a high probability of being within a range of the value of the true optimal regime, set a priori. We examine the performance of the proposed procedure with a simulation study and use it to size a study for reducing depressive symptoms using data from electronic health records.</p>","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245299/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46457253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leveraging Contact Network Information in Clustered Randomized Studies of Contagion Processes. 在传染过程的聚类随机研究中利用接触网络信息
Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0021
Maxwell H Wang, Patrick Staples, Mélanie Prague, Ravi Goyal, Victor DeGruttola, Jukka-Pekka Onnela

In a randomized study, leveraging covariates related to the outcome (e.g. disease status) may produce less variable estimates of the effect of exposure. For contagion processes operating on a contact network, transmission can only occur through ties that connect affected and unaffected individuals; the outcome of such a process is known to depend intimately on the structure of the network. In this paper, we investigate the use of contact network features as efficiency covariates in exposure effect estimation. Using augmented generalized estimating equations (GEE), we estimate how gains in efficiency depend on the network structure and spread of the contagious agent or behavior. We apply this approach to simulated randomized trials using a stochastic compartmental contagion model on a collection of model-based contact networks and compare the bias, power, and variance of the estimated exposure effects using an assortment of network covariate adjustment strategies. We also demonstrate the use of network-augmented GEEs on a clustered randomized trial evaluating the effects of wastewater monitoring on COVID-19 cases in residential buildings at the the University of California San Diego.

在随机研究中,利用与结果相关的协变量(如疾病状态)可能会减少对暴露影响的估计值的变化。对于在接触网络上运行的传染过程,传播只能通过连接受影响个体和未受影响个体的纽带发生;众所周知,这种过程的结果与网络结构密切相关。在本文中,我们研究了在暴露效应估计中使用接触网络特征作为效率协变量的问题。通过使用增强型广义估计方程(GEE),我们估算了效率收益如何取决于网络结构以及传染性病原体或行为的传播。我们将这种方法应用于在一系列基于模型的接触网络上使用随机分区传染模型进行的模拟随机试验,并比较了使用各种网络协变量调整策略估算的暴露效果的偏差、功率和方差。我们还在加州大学圣地亚哥分校的一项聚类随机试验中演示了网络增强 GEE 的使用,该试验评估了废水监测对住宅楼 COVID-19 病例的影响。
{"title":"Leveraging Contact Network Information in Clustered Randomized Studies of Contagion Processes.","authors":"Maxwell H Wang, Patrick Staples, Mélanie Prague, Ravi Goyal, Victor DeGruttola, Jukka-Pekka Onnela","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0021","DOIUrl":"10.1353/obs.2023.0021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a randomized study, leveraging covariates related to the outcome (e.g. disease status) may produce less variable estimates of the effect of exposure. For contagion processes operating on a contact network, transmission can only occur through ties that connect affected and unaffected individuals; the outcome of such a process is known to depend intimately on the structure of the network. In this paper, we investigate the use of contact network features as efficiency covariates in exposure effect estimation. Using augmented generalized estimating equations (GEE), we estimate how gains in efficiency depend on the network structure and spread of the contagious agent or behavior. We apply this approach to simulated randomized trials using a stochastic compartmental contagion model on a collection of model-based contact networks and compare the bias, power, and variance of the estimated exposure effects using an assortment of network covariate adjustment strategies. We also demonstrate the use of network-augmented GEEs on a clustered randomized trial evaluating the effects of wastewater monitoring on COVID-19 cases in residential buildings at the the University of California San Diego.</p>","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10270696/pdf/nihms-1870046.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9722502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bayesian Causal Forests & the 2022 ACIC Data Challenge: Scalability and Sensitivity 贝叶斯因果森林与2022 ACIC数据挑战:可扩展性和敏感性
Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2023.0024
Ajinkya Kokandakar, Hyunseung Kang, Sameer K. Deshpande
Abstract:We demonstrate how Hahn et al.'s Bayesian Causal Forests model (BCF) can be used to estimate conditional average treatment effects for the longitudinal dataset in the 2022 American Causal Inference Conference Data Challenge. Unfortunately, existing implementations of BCF do not scale to the size of the challenge data. Therefore, we developed flexBCF—a more scalable and flexible implementation of BCF— and used it in our challenge submission. We investigate the sensitivity of our results to the choice of propensity score estimation method and the use of sparsity-inducing regression tree priors. While we found that our overall point predictions were not especially sensitive to these modeling choices, we did observe that running BCF with flexibly estimated propensity scores often yielded better-calibrated uncertainty intervals.
摘要:我们展示了Hahn等人的贝叶斯因果森林模型(BCF)如何在2022年美国因果推理会议数据挑战中用于估计纵向数据集的条件平均治疗效果。不幸的是,BCF的现有实现无法扩展到挑战数据的大小。因此,我们开发了flexBCF——一种更具可扩展性和灵活性的BCF实现——并在我们的挑战提交中使用了它。我们研究了我们的结果对倾向得分估计方法的选择和稀疏性诱导回归树先验的使用的敏感性。虽然我们发现我们的总体点预测对这些建模选择并不特别敏感,但我们确实观察到,用灵活估计的倾向得分运行BCF通常会产生更好的校准不确定性区间。
{"title":"Bayesian Causal Forests & the 2022 ACIC Data Challenge: Scalability and Sensitivity","authors":"Ajinkya Kokandakar, Hyunseung Kang, Sameer K. Deshpande","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0024","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We demonstrate how Hahn et al.'s Bayesian Causal Forests model (BCF) can be used to estimate conditional average treatment effects for the longitudinal dataset in the 2022 American Causal Inference Conference Data Challenge. Unfortunately, existing implementations of BCF do not scale to the size of the challenge data. Therefore, we developed flexBCF—a more scalable and flexible implementation of BCF— and used it in our challenge submission. We investigate the sensitivity of our results to the choice of propensity score estimation method and the use of sparsity-inducing regression tree priors. While we found that our overall point predictions were not especially sensitive to these modeling choices, we did observe that running BCF with flexibly estimated propensity scores often yielded better-calibrated uncertainty intervals.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48070886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Causal Inference: History, Perspectives, Adventures, and Unification (An Interview with Judea Pearl) 因果推理:历史、视角、冒险与统一(朱迪亚·珀尔访谈)
Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/obs.2022.0007
J. Pearl
In October 2022, the journal Observational Studies published interviews with 4 causal inference contributors, James Heckman, Jamie Robins, Don Rubin and myself [Observational Studies, 2022, 8(2):7–94. https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/48885]. My interview (with Ian Shrier) was conducted in June 2019, and is provided below as published. The only change made is the References section, which was incomplete in the published version. Fundamental disagreements with the other three interviewees and commentaries will be further discussed and posted on my blog.
2022年10月,《观察研究》杂志发表了对4位因果推理贡献者的采访,他们是James Heckman、Jamie Robins、Don Rubin和我自己[观察研究,2022,8(2):7-94]。https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/48885]。我(对伊恩·施勒)的采访是在2019年6月进行的,如下所示。唯一的变化是参考文献部分,这在发布版本中是不完整的。与其他三位受访者的根本分歧和评论将进一步讨论并发表在我的博客上。
{"title":"Causal Inference: History, Perspectives, Adventures, and Unification (An Interview with Judea Pearl)","authors":"J. Pearl","doi":"10.1353/obs.2022.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2022.0007","url":null,"abstract":"In October 2022, the journal Observational Studies published interviews with 4 causal inference contributors, James Heckman, Jamie Robins, Don Rubin and myself [Observational Studies, 2022, 8(2):7–94. https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/48885]. My interview (with Ian Shrier) was conducted in June 2019, and is provided below as published. The only change made is the References section, which was incomplete in the published version. Fundamental disagreements with the other three interviewees and commentaries will be further discussed and posted on my blog.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43435750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Observational studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1