Porto biomedical journal最新文献

Objectives: Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are common worldwide health problems with a strong relationship in between. NAFLD is currently the most common cause of abnormal liver function tests (LFT) because of obesity pandemic. The question is NAFLD the only player of abnormal LFT in obesity?

Methodology: This article reviews the most important topics regarding the derangements of LFT in obesity through a PubMed search strategy for all English-language literature.

Results: The reported abnormal LFT in obesity were increased serum levels of transaminases (alanine aminotransaminase, aspartate aminotransaminase), gamma glutamyl transferase, and alkaline phosphatase and decreased serum levels of bilirubin and albumin. Besides novel potential hepatic markers of NAFLD/NASH such as triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, sex hormone-binding globulin, fibroblast growth factor 21, and markers of hepatocyte apoptosis i.e. cytokeratin 18 and microribonucleic acids (miRNAs). Beyond NAFLD, there are other underlying players for the abnormal LFT in obesity such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and insulin resistance.

Conclusion: Derangements of LFT in obesity are attributed to NAFLD but also to obesity itself and its related oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammatory state. Abnormal LFT predict more than just liver disease.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) strongly affect the quality of life of patients with cancer. Inadequate antiemetic control leads to the decline of patients' quality of life, increases rescue interventions, and may even compromise adherence to cancer treatment. Although there are international recommendations for controlling CINV and RINV, these recommendations focus mainly on pharmacological management, with scarce information on additional measures that patients may adopt. Moreover, the prophylaxis and management of CINV/RINV are not always applied. Thus, we identified the need to systematize the strategies for preventing and managing CINV/RINV and the associated risk factors to implement and promote effective prophylactic antiemetic regimens therapy in patients with cancer. This review sought to create a set of practical recommendations for managing and controlling CINV/RINV, according to the current international recommendations for antiemetic therapy and the main risk factors. Conclusively, we intended to produce a patient-centered guidance document for health care professionals focused on the awareness, monitoring, and treatment of CINV/RINV.

Background: Although the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) optimizes surgical conditions and facilitates tracheal intubation, it can lead to residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB), with postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess RNMB incidence and management in Portugal.

Methods: Prospective observational study of patients admitted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with nondepolarizing NMBAs between July 2018 and July 2019 at 10 Portuguese hospitals. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients arriving at postanesthesia care unit (PACU) with a TOF ratio <0.9.

Results: A total of 366 patients were included, with a median age of 59 years, and 89.1% classified as ASA II or III. Rocuronium was the most used NMBA (99.5%). A total of 96.2% of patients received a reversal agent, 96.6% of which sugammadex and 3.4% neostigmine. Twenty patients displayed a TOF ratio <0.9 at PACU arrival, representing an RNMB incidence of 5.5% (95% CI, 3.1%-7.8%). Only two patients displayed a TOF ratio <0.7. RNMB incidence was 16.7% with neostigmine and 5.3% with sugammadex (P = .114). In patients with intraoperative neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring, RNMB incidence was 5% (95% CI, 2%-8%), which varied significantly according to the type of monitoring (P = .018). Incidence of adverse events was 3.3% (2 severe and 10 moderate).

Conclusions: The reported overall incidence of 5.5% is numerically lower than results from similar observational studies. An appropriate pharmacological neuromuscular reversal strategy, guided by quantitative neuromuscular monitoring, has the potential to achieve even better results, converting RNMB from an unusual to a very rare or even inexistent event.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disease that affects one-third of the population worldwide. In recent years, there have been significant advances for diagnostic workup, which leads to better identification of reflux-related complications. Classically, the mainstay of therapy has been proton pump inhibitor and lifestyle and dietary modifications. For refractory GERD the gold-standard therapies are surgical antireflux procedures. Recently, endoscopic procedures have emerged as safe and efficient alternatives to surgery. These could represent a less invasive approach, with scarce morbidity and with a well-tolerated profile. Each of the existing endoscopic techniques for the treatment of GERD are addressed in this report, highlighting their potential advantages, aiming at helping decide the best management of these patients. Future studies, with larger numbers of patients, may allow a definitive role for these techniques in the management of GERD to be established.

Vaccination for influenza has been essential over the years to protect the most vulnerable populations. Moreover, it was recently suggested that influenza vaccination might confer some nonspecific immunity to other viruses and be associated with a lower risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of repetitive influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of health care workers (HCWs). This study was conducted among HCWs at São João University Hospital Center (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal, a tertiary reference hospital for diagnosis and therapy, one of the largest hospitals in the country with approximately 6000 HCWs. We analyzed databases for influenza vaccination conducted between 2012 and 2019 and COVID-19 laboratory testing retrieved from the first and last registered positive COVID test date before HCW's COVID-19 vaccination started. The study outcome was the incidence of the first SARS-CoV-2 infection, as determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Age and sex were considered potential confounders. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate odds ratios. Neither the absolute number nor the proportion of influenza shots influenced the risk of getting infected by SARS-CoV-2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI: 0.9-1.06 and 1.17 95% CI: 0.86-1.58, respectively). Similar findings were observed in most cases when the analysis was restricted by year. The findings from our retrospective observational analysis of a HCWs cohort failed to support any protective effect between repetitive influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Background: Orthopedic patients are at the highest risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nowadays, with VTE prophylaxis as a routine in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR), fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) is rare and the rates of symptomatic VTE within 3 months dropped to 1.3%-10%, compared with the rates of 50%-70% before VTE prophylaxis implementation. In this study, we aim to evaluate the VTE prophylaxis and incidence in patients who underwent THR and TKR in Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António (CHUdSA).

Methods: We included 483 patients who underwent elective THR or TKR in CHUdSA from March 2019 to February 2020 and who were under enoxaparin as a VTE prophylaxis drug. All data related to prescribed enoxaparin were collected from the nationwide common electronic drug prescription system (PEM).

Results: Of the 483 eligible patients, 192 (39.75%) underwent elective THR and 291 (60.25%) underwent TKR. Enoxaparin was prescribed for 31.86 ± 5.98 and 30.28 ± 5.97 days, on average, for the THR and TKR groups, respectively (P = .005). Patients completed, on average, 29.38 ± 8.12 days and 28.20 ± 7.32 days of VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin in the THR and TKR groups, respectively (P = .098). The incidence of VTE was approximately 3.13% and 0.69% in the THR and TKR groups, respectively (P = .064).

Conclusion: In CHUdSA, we usually prescribe enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for up to 35 days for VTE prophylaxis after THR or TKR. High therapeutic compliance rates resulted in very few events.

Background: Nondipper hypertensive patients have higher levels of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, a new studied inflammatory biomarker in primary hypertension. Furthermore, these patients have a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess the relationship between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and hypertensive pattern (dipper vs nondipper) and the association between the hypertensive pattern and major adverse cardiovascular events.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed. One hundred fifty-three patients were included and classified as dipper or nondipper according to 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was calculated based on complete blood count data.

Results: The dipper group included 109 patients, and the nondipper group included 44 patients. Nondipper patients have 2.11 more risk of presenting a higher platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio than dipper individuals (odds ratio [OR] = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.220-3.664; P = .007). Nondipper patients also registered earlier cardiovascular events, such as acute myocardial infarction and stroke (P < .001).

Conclusions: Nondipper hypertensive individuals registered higher levels of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and earlier cardiovascular events than dipper patients. Therefore, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio could be used as an indirect predictor of cardiovascular risk in primary hypertension and contribute to optimize preventive strategies.