Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000216
Anju Mathew, Mohan N
Purpose: To assess the prevalence, length, and patterns of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and methodology: A prospective study was conducted on 300 mental foramen regions by exposing them to panoramic radiography and CBCT scan. Two individual observers evaluated the images to assess the presence of an anterior loop, the mean length of the loop, and the most frequent pattern of the loop in our population.
Result analysis: The prevalence of the anterior loop for male patients and female patients by panoramic radiography was 34% and 32% on the right side and 30% and 36% on left side, respectively. By CBCT, the corresponding values were 69% and 72% on the right and left side, respectively, for male patients, and 73% and 81% on the right and left side, for female patients, respectively.
Conclusion: The results from our study strongly emphasize the need for CBCT imaging before planning for procedures in the mental foramen region because the prevalence, length, and pattern of loop significantly varies with respect to age, sex, and population.
{"title":"Prevalence, length, and patterns of Anterior Loop among the South Indian population: A comparative study between Panoramic Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.","authors":"Anju Mathew, Mohan N","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the prevalence, length, and patterns of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methodology: </strong>A prospective study was conducted on 300 mental foramen regions by exposing them to panoramic radiography and CBCT scan. Two individual observers evaluated the images to assess the presence of an anterior loop, the mean length of the loop, and the most frequent pattern of the loop in our population.</p><p><strong>Result analysis: </strong>The prevalence of the anterior loop for male patients and female patients by panoramic radiography was 34% and 32% on the right side and 30% and 36% on left side, respectively. By CBCT, the corresponding values were 69% and 72% on the right and left side, respectively, for male patients, and 73% and 81% on the right and left side, for female patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from our study strongly emphasize the need for CBCT imaging before planning for procedures in the mental foramen region because the prevalence, length, and pattern of loop significantly varies with respect to age, sex, and population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"e216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/f9/pj9-8-e216.PMC10289755.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9715987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000213
Urânia Fernandes, Gonçalo Guidi, Daniela Martins, Bruno Vieira, Clara Leal, Carolina Marques, Francisca Freitas, Margarida Dupont, Juliana Ribeiro, Carina Gomes, Rita Marques, Paulo Avelar, Ana Sofia Esteves, João Pinto-de-Sousa
Introduction: Breast cancer in young women is usually considered as breast cancer occurring in women younger than 40 years and is the most frequent cancer-related cause of death in these patients. In the past few years, there seems to be an increasing trend in the prevalence of breast cancer in young women, which, associated with poorer prognosis, more aggressive histologic features, and more frequent recurrence rates, makes it a rising threat to young women. This study aimed to evaluate the biological behavior of breast cancer in young women in our institution.
Material and methods: A retrospective, unicentric, cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2016. All consecutive patients with breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Cases were divided into two groups: case group, those younger than 40 years, and control group, those 40 years or older. The exclusion criterion was nonoperative treatment. Several clinical and pathologic parameters were evaluated, as well as were overall survival time and disease-free survival time.
Results: The incidence of breast cancer in young women presented a rising tendency over the study period. Significant differences were observed in the comparison of the groups according to body mass index, age at menarche, age at birth of the first child, and proliferation rate. There were no differences in overall survival and disease-free survival rates between the groups.
Conclusions: Young women had a more symptomatic presentation, a greater tumor proliferation rate, but similar outcomes compared with older patients. Greater multicentric studies are needed to confirm or refute these results.
{"title":"Breast cancer in young women: a rising threat: A 5-year follow-up comparative study.","authors":"Urânia Fernandes, Gonçalo Guidi, Daniela Martins, Bruno Vieira, Clara Leal, Carolina Marques, Francisca Freitas, Margarida Dupont, Juliana Ribeiro, Carina Gomes, Rita Marques, Paulo Avelar, Ana Sofia Esteves, João Pinto-de-Sousa","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer in young women is usually considered as breast cancer occurring in women younger than 40 years and is the most frequent cancer-related cause of death in these patients. In the past few years, there seems to be an increasing trend in the prevalence of breast cancer in young women, which, associated with poorer prognosis, more aggressive histologic features, and more frequent recurrence rates, makes it a rising threat to young women. This study aimed to evaluate the biological behavior of breast cancer in young women in our institution.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective, unicentric, cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2016. All consecutive patients with breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Cases were divided into two groups: case group, those younger than 40 years, and control group, those 40 years or older. The exclusion criterion was nonoperative treatment. Several clinical and pathologic parameters were evaluated, as well as were overall survival time and disease-free survival time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of breast cancer in young women presented a rising tendency over the study period. Significant differences were observed in the comparison of the groups according to body mass index, age at menarche, age at birth of the first child, and proliferation rate. There were no differences in overall survival and disease-free survival rates between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Young women had a more symptomatic presentation, a greater tumor proliferation rate, but similar outcomes compared with older patients. Greater multicentric studies are needed to confirm or refute these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"e213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/ba/pj9-8-e213.PMC10289488.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9771003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: There is little information on diagnosis and management of small bowel lymphomas, and optimal management strategies are still undefined. This study aims to describe their main clinical and pathological characteristics and identify poor prognostic factors.
Methods: A retrospective observational study of all patients with histological diagnosis of small bowel lymphoma between January 2010 and December 2020 was performed.
Results: We included 40 patients, with male predominance (60%) and mean age of 60.7 years. The ileum was the most common location, and the most common histological subtypes were follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clinical presentation was variable from asymptomatic patients (30%) to acute surgical complications (35%) including perforation, intestinal obstruction, ileal intussusception, or severe bleeding. Diagnosis was established by endoscopy in 22 patients (55%), and the most common findings included polyps, single mass, diffuse infiltration, or ulceration, whereas 18 (45%) required surgery because of acute presentations or tumor resection, and lymphoma was diagnosed postoperatively. Surgery was curative in one-third of those patients. Median survival was 52 months. Acute presentation (P = 0.001), symptomatic disease (P = 0.003), advanced stage (P = 0.008), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (P = 0.007), anemia (P = 0.006), hypoalbuminemia (P < 0.001), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.02), elevated C-reactive protein (P < 0.001), and absence of treatment response (P < 0.001) were significant predictors of mortality.
Conclusion: Small bowel lymphoma is a rare malignancy with diverse clinical and endoscopic presentations that require a high index of suspicion. Primary factors associated with worse outcome included acute presentation, advanced stage, histological subtype, biochemical abnormalities, and absence of treatment response.
{"title":"Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of small bowel lymphomas: a retrospective single-center study.","authors":"Emanuel Dias, Renato Medas, Margarida Marques, Patrícia Andrade, Hélder Cardoso, Guilherme Macedo","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little information on diagnosis and management of small bowel lymphomas, and optimal management strategies are still undefined. This study aims to describe their main clinical and pathological characteristics and identify poor prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study of all patients with histological diagnosis of small bowel lymphoma between January 2010 and December 2020 was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 40 patients, with male predominance (60%) and mean age of 60.7 years. The ileum was the most common location, and the most common histological subtypes were follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clinical presentation was variable from asymptomatic patients (30%) to acute surgical complications (35%) including perforation, intestinal obstruction, ileal intussusception, or severe bleeding. Diagnosis was established by endoscopy in 22 patients (55%), and the most common findings included polyps, single mass, diffuse infiltration, or ulceration, whereas 18 (45%) required surgery because of acute presentations or tumor resection, and lymphoma was diagnosed postoperatively. Surgery was curative in one-third of those patients. Median survival was 52 months. Acute presentation (<i>P</i> = 0.001), symptomatic disease (<i>P</i> = 0.003), advanced stage (<i>P</i> = 0.008), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (<i>P</i> = 0.007), anemia (<i>P</i> = 0.006), hypoalbuminemia (<i>P</i> < 0.001), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (<i>P</i> = 0.02), elevated C-reactive protein (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and absence of treatment response (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were significant predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small bowel lymphoma is a rare malignancy with diverse clinical and endoscopic presentations that require a high index of suspicion. Primary factors associated with worse outcome included acute presentation, advanced stage, histological subtype, biochemical abnormalities, and absence of treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"e217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/a5/pj9-8-e217.PMC10289779.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9717229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000215
Daniel Teles, Mariana Silva, Joana Berger-Estilita, Helder Pereira
Debriefing is an essential procedure for identifying medical errors, improving communication, reviewing team performance, and providing emotional support after a critical event. This study aimed to describe the current practice and limitations of debriefing and gauge opinions on the best timing, effectiveness, need for training, use of established format, and expected goals of debriefing among Portuguese anesthesiologists.
Methods: We performed a national cross-sectional online survey exploring the practice of anesthesiologists' debriefing practice after critical events in Portuguese hospitals. The questionnaire was distributed using a snowball sampling technique from July to September 2021. Data were descriptively and comparatively analyzed.
Results: We had replies from 186 anesthesiologists (11.3% of the Portuguese pool). Acute respiratory event was the most reported type of critical event (96%). Debriefing occurred rarely or never in 53% of cases, 59% of respondents needed more training in debriefing, and only 4% reported having specific tools in their institutions to carry it out. There was no statistical association between having a debriefing protocol and the occurrence of critical events (P=.474) or having trained personnel (P=.95). The existence of protocols was associated with lower frequencies of debriefing (P=.017).
Conclusions: Portuguese anesthesiologists know that debriefing is an essential process that increases patient safety, but among those surveyed, there is a need for an adequate debriefing culture or practice.
Trial registration: Research registry 7741 (https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home).
{"title":"Practice of debriefing of critical events: a survey-based cross-sectional study of Portuguese anesthesiologists.","authors":"Daniel Teles, Mariana Silva, Joana Berger-Estilita, Helder Pereira","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debriefing is an essential procedure for identifying medical errors, improving communication, reviewing team performance, and providing emotional support after a critical event. This study aimed to describe the current practice and limitations of debriefing and gauge opinions on the best timing, effectiveness, need for training, use of established format, and expected goals of debriefing among Portuguese anesthesiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a national cross-sectional online survey exploring the practice of anesthesiologists' debriefing practice after critical events in Portuguese hospitals. The questionnaire was distributed using a snowball sampling technique from July to September 2021. Data were descriptively and comparatively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had replies from 186 anesthesiologists (11.3% of the Portuguese pool). Acute respiratory event was the most reported type of critical event (96%). Debriefing occurred rarely or never in 53% of cases, 59% of respondents needed more training in debriefing, and only 4% reported having specific tools in their institutions to carry it out. There was no statistical association between having a debriefing protocol and the occurrence of critical events (<i>P</i>=.474) or having trained personnel (<i>P</i>=.95). The existence of protocols was associated with lower frequencies of debriefing (<i>P</i>=.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Portuguese anesthesiologists know that debriefing is an essential process that increases patient safety, but among those surveyed, there is a need for an adequate debriefing culture or practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Research registry 7741 (https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home).</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"e215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10289546/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10105147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000218
Luís Fabião, Ana Ribau, Carolina Lemos, Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto
Background: While fluoroscopy is widely used in orthopedic trauma surgeries, it is associated with harmful effects and should, therefore, be minimized. However, reference values for these surgeries have not been defined, and it is not known how surgeon experience affects these factors. The aims of this study were to analyze the radiation emitted and exposure time for common orthopedic trauma surgeries and to assess whether they are affected by surgeon experience.
Methods: Data from 1842 trauma orthopedic procedures were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 1421 procedures were included in the analysis. Radiation dose and time were collected to identify reference values for each surgery and compared for when the lead surgeon was a young resident, a senior resident, or a specialist.
Results: The most performed surgeries requiring fluoroscopy were proximal femur short intramedullary nailing (n = 401), ankle open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (n = 141), distal radius ORIF (n = 125), and proximal femur dynamic hip screw (DHS) (n = 114). Surgeries using higher radiation dose were proximal femur long intramedullary nailing (mean dose area [DAP]): 1361.35 mGycm2), proximal femur DHS (1094.81 mGycm2), and proximal femur short intramedullary nailing (891.41 mGycm2). Surgeries requiring longer radiation time were proximal humerus and/or humeral shaft intramedullary nailing (02 mm:20 ss), proximal femur long intramedullary nailing (02 mm:04 ss), and tibial shaft/distal tibia intramedullary nailing (01 mm:49 ss). Senior residents required shorter radiation time when performing short intramedullary nailing of the proximal femur than young residents. Specialists required more radiation dose than residents when performing tibial nailing and tibial plateau ORIF and required longer radiation time than young residents when performing tibial nailing.
Conclusions: This study presents mean values of radiation dose and time for common orthopedic trauma surgeries. Orthopedic surgeon experience influences radiation dose and time values. Contrary to expected, less experience is associated with lower values in some of the cases analyzed.
{"title":"Intraoperative fluoroscopic radiation in orthopedic trauma: correlation with surgery type and surgeon experience.","authors":"Luís Fabião, Ana Ribau, Carolina Lemos, Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While fluoroscopy is widely used in orthopedic trauma surgeries, it is associated with harmful effects and should, therefore, be minimized. However, reference values for these surgeries have not been defined, and it is not known how surgeon experience affects these factors. The aims of this study were to analyze the radiation emitted and exposure time for common orthopedic trauma surgeries and to assess whether they are affected by surgeon experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 1842 trauma orthopedic procedures were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 1421 procedures were included in the analysis. Radiation dose and time were collected to identify reference values for each surgery and compared for when the lead surgeon was a young resident, a senior resident, or a specialist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most performed surgeries requiring fluoroscopy were proximal femur short intramedullary nailing (n = 401), ankle open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (n = 141), distal radius ORIF (n = 125), and proximal femur dynamic hip screw (DHS) (n = 114). Surgeries using higher radiation dose were proximal femur long intramedullary nailing (mean dose area [DAP]): 1361.35 mGycm<sup>2</sup>), proximal femur DHS (1094.81 mGycm<sup>2</sup>), and proximal femur short intramedullary nailing (891.41 mGycm<sup>2</sup>). Surgeries requiring longer radiation time were proximal humerus and/or humeral shaft intramedullary nailing (02 mm:20 ss), proximal femur long intramedullary nailing (02 mm:04 ss), and tibial shaft/distal tibia intramedullary nailing (01 mm:49 ss). Senior residents required shorter radiation time when performing short intramedullary nailing of the proximal femur than young residents. Specialists required more radiation dose than residents when performing tibial nailing and tibial plateau ORIF and required longer radiation time than young residents when performing tibial nailing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study presents mean values of radiation dose and time for common orthopedic trauma surgeries. Orthopedic surgeon experience influences radiation dose and time values. Contrary to expected, less experience is associated with lower values in some of the cases analyzed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"e218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/26/pj9-8-e218.PMC10289723.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10093491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000219
Vanessa S G Teófilo, Paulo R A Pinho, Gonçalo J Cordeiro, Nuno A F Saldanha, Pedro M M Matos, Rui A M Ribeiro, Salomé M Moreira, Mariana S F Miller, Andreia R M Dias, Marta F R Couto, Pedro M P N S Norton
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was classified as a pandemic in March 2020 by the World Health Organization. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was the first to be authorized in the European Union, based on data from phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials of limited duration. Concerns have been raised regarding the vaccine's safety profile. Some of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with vaccines may not have been identified during clinical trials. This study aimed to identify ADRs associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in health care professionals at a Portuguese tertiary university hospital.
Methods: The data used in this analysis consist of ADRs reported through a spontaneous notification system from vaccines administered between December 27, 2020, and January 31, 2021. ADRs were categorized according to the MedDRA terminology.
Results: A total of 8,605 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were administered to 4568 health care professionals. ADRs were reported among 520 of the vaccines, with an incidence of 13.56% in women and 5.31% in men. The mean age of the population reporting ADRs was 41.52 years, with a standard deviation of 9.83 years. The most frequent ADRs were myalgia (n = 274), headache (n = 199), pyrexia (n = 164), injection site pain (n = 160), fatigue (n = 84), nausea (n = 81), chills (n = 65), lymphadenopathy (n = 64), and arthralgia (n = 53). Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 15 health care professionals, with no anaphylactic reactions observed. A total of four Important Medical Events were observed, which consisted of two cases of syncope, one case of sudden hearing loss, and one case of transverse myelitis.
Conclusion: The vaccine was well-tolerated among the study participants. Reactogenicity was greater after the second dose. The incidence of ADRs was higher in women and individuals aged between 40 to 49 years. Systemic adverse reactions were most frequently reported. Systematic monitoring of ADRs of COVID-19 vaccines in real-life context is essential for a more robust establishment of its safety profile.
{"title":"Spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions associated with the COVID-19 vaccine in health care professionals: A descriptive observational study conducted in a Portuguese hospital.","authors":"Vanessa S G Teófilo, Paulo R A Pinho, Gonçalo J Cordeiro, Nuno A F Saldanha, Pedro M M Matos, Rui A M Ribeiro, Salomé M Moreira, Mariana S F Miller, Andreia R M Dias, Marta F R Couto, Pedro M P N S Norton","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000219","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was classified as a pandemic in March 2020 by the World Health Organization. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was the first to be authorized in the European Union, based on data from phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials of limited duration. Concerns have been raised regarding the vaccine's safety profile. Some of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with vaccines may not have been identified during clinical trials. This study aimed to identify ADRs associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in health care professionals at a Portuguese tertiary university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data used in this analysis consist of ADRs reported through a spontaneous notification system from vaccines administered between December 27, 2020, and January 31, 2021. ADRs were categorized according to the MedDRA terminology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,605 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were administered to 4568 health care professionals. ADRs were reported among 520 of the vaccines, with an incidence of 13.56% in women and 5.31% in men. The mean age of the population reporting ADRs was 41.52 years, with a standard deviation of 9.83 years. The most frequent ADRs were myalgia (n = 274), headache (n = 199), pyrexia (n = 164), injection site pain (n = 160), fatigue (n = 84), nausea (n = 81), chills (n = 65), lymphadenopathy (n = 64), and arthralgia (n = 53). Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 15 health care professionals, with no anaphylactic reactions observed. A total of four Important Medical Events were observed, which consisted of two cases of syncope, one case of sudden hearing loss, and one case of transverse myelitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The vaccine was well-tolerated among the study participants. Reactogenicity was greater after the second dose. The incidence of ADRs was higher in women and individuals aged between 40 to 49 years. Systemic adverse reactions were most frequently reported. Systematic monitoring of ADRs of COVID-19 vaccines in real-life context is essential for a more robust establishment of its safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"e219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/f8/pj9-8-e219.PMC10299789.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10096403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000211
Vincent Zimmer
To the Editor: A 61-year-old male patient with critical alcohol consumption presented with progressive dysphagia and several self-resolved bolus impactions. Index endoscopy indicated a high-grade stricture at 22 cm, warranting passage with a pediatric gastroscope, along with small openings consistent with esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis (EIPD). In the distal esophagus, a Schatzki ring emerged with additional pseudodiverticulae. The patient underwent esophageal bougienage to 14 mm. Image-enhanced endoscopy before scheduled repeat bougienage was perfomed, highlighting proximal EIPD on linked color imaging (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, linked color imaging illustrated diffuse spots correlating with what has been designated as the “faux uni” pattern on white light endoscopy. Apart from illustrating active movements with variations of orifice sizes, further characterization using blue laser imaging (BLI) confirmed absent submucosal vessels, while dot-shaped and line-shaped congested intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCL) were clearly appreciated (Fig. 1B). This finding was accentuated in scarred and pseudodiverticula-bearing segments, suggesting EIPD inflammation-driven microvascular alterations (Fig. 1C). Notwithstanding that IPCL changes notably on magnification endoscopy have been reported in other benign esophageal diseases, such as eosinophilic and/or lymphocytic esophagitis (both excluded in this patient), IPCL alterations have never been reported in EIPD nor in any other chronic inflammatory esophageal disorder on nonmagnified conditions (Fig. 1D). Of note, pathology indicating unspecific chronic inflammation did exclude dysplastic changes. While the concept of IPCLs, relying on magnification imageenhanced endoscopy, has been developed to highlight early squamous cell dysplasia and neoplasia, its potential role in chronic inflammatory esophageal diseases awaits further evolution. Albeit not validated for nonenhanced endoscopic assessment, the findings in this patient may suggest IPLC type 2 with uniform dilation and elongation, likewise suggesting a benign condition.
{"title":"Intrapapillary capillary loop abundance on nonmagnified blue laser imaging in esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis.","authors":"Vincent Zimmer","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000211","url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor: A 61-year-old male patient with critical alcohol consumption presented with progressive dysphagia and several self-resolved bolus impactions. Index endoscopy indicated a high-grade stricture at 22 cm, warranting passage with a pediatric gastroscope, along with small openings consistent with esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis (EIPD). In the distal esophagus, a Schatzki ring emerged with additional pseudodiverticulae. The patient underwent esophageal bougienage to 14 mm. Image-enhanced endoscopy before scheduled repeat bougienage was perfomed, highlighting proximal EIPD on linked color imaging (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, linked color imaging illustrated diffuse spots correlating with what has been designated as the “faux uni” pattern on white light endoscopy. Apart from illustrating active movements with variations of orifice sizes, further characterization using blue laser imaging (BLI) confirmed absent submucosal vessels, while dot-shaped and line-shaped congested intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCL) were clearly appreciated (Fig. 1B). This finding was accentuated in scarred and pseudodiverticula-bearing segments, suggesting EIPD inflammation-driven microvascular alterations (Fig. 1C). Notwithstanding that IPCL changes notably on magnification endoscopy have been reported in other benign esophageal diseases, such as eosinophilic and/or lymphocytic esophagitis (both excluded in this patient), IPCL alterations have never been reported in EIPD nor in any other chronic inflammatory esophageal disorder on nonmagnified conditions (Fig. 1D). Of note, pathology indicating unspecific chronic inflammation did exclude dysplastic changes. While the concept of IPCLs, relying on magnification imageenhanced endoscopy, has been developed to highlight early squamous cell dysplasia and neoplasia, its potential role in chronic inflammatory esophageal diseases awaits further evolution. Albeit not validated for nonenhanced endoscopic assessment, the findings in this patient may suggest IPLC type 2 with uniform dilation and elongation, likewise suggesting a benign condition.","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"e211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/06/pj9-8-e211.PMC10289579.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9715989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000200
Sofia Tavares-Almeida, Diana Moura, Nuno Madeira, Margarida Figueiredo-Braga
Background: University students are a risk population for mental health problems. This study aims to evaluate the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portuguese university students and to uncover factors associated with worse psychological indicators.
Methods: We used an online survey to perform a cross-sectional study that evaluated students' perceptions, lifestyle, and psychological well-being during the pandemic. Depression symptoms and risk were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and resilience levels were quantified by the 9-item Resilience Evaluation Scale. Self-perceived levels of anxiety and current mental health status were evaluated.
Results: From a population of around 30,000 students invited to participate, 1751 responses were obtained and 1447 were included. Most students were female (72.3%) and were taking a master's degree (58.4%). The course with more responses was engineering (25.5%), followed by medicine (13.2%). The prevalence rates for higher anxiety levels, depression risk, and low resilience levels were 66.7%, 37.3%, and 24.9%, respectively. The factors associated with better psychological outcomes were being male, spending more time studying, having a job, performing extracurricular activities, physical exercise, and relaxing activities. By contrast, spending more time watching news, difficulty accessing online lectures, and absence of contact with family or friends were associated with worse psychological indicators. Although all courses presented substantial levels of depressive symptoms, architectures/arts, sciences, and humanities scored significantly more in the depression scale. Medicine students had significantly higher resilience levels compared with other courses.
Conclusions: Our findings identify factors associated with worse psychological outcomes and can be used to create protective measures for the mental health of university students during current and future pandemics.
{"title":"Psychological burden in Portuguese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Sofia Tavares-Almeida, Diana Moura, Nuno Madeira, Margarida Figueiredo-Braga","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>University students are a risk population for mental health problems. This study aims to evaluate the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portuguese university students and to uncover factors associated with worse psychological indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an online survey to perform a cross-sectional study that evaluated students' perceptions, lifestyle, and psychological well-being during the pandemic. Depression symptoms and risk were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and resilience levels were quantified by the 9-item Resilience Evaluation Scale. Self-perceived levels of anxiety and current mental health status were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a population of around 30,000 students invited to participate, 1751 responses were obtained and 1447 were included. Most students were female (72.3%) and were taking a master's degree (58.4%). The course with more responses was engineering (25.5%), followed by medicine (13.2%). The prevalence rates for higher anxiety levels, depression risk, and low resilience levels were 66.7%, 37.3%, and 24.9%, respectively. The factors associated with better psychological outcomes were being male, spending more time studying, having a job, performing extracurricular activities, physical exercise, and relaxing activities. By contrast, spending more time watching news, difficulty accessing online lectures, and absence of contact with family or friends were associated with worse psychological indicators. Although all courses presented substantial levels of depressive symptoms, architectures/arts, sciences, and humanities scored significantly more in the depression scale. Medicine students had significantly higher resilience levels compared with other courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings identify factors associated with worse psychological outcomes and can be used to create protective measures for the mental health of university students during current and future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"e200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/0c/pj9-8-e200.PMC10158877.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9783547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000212
Rita Rego, Margarida Madeira, Eugeniu Gisca, Daniela Brigas, Ana Vigário, Arsénio Barbosa, Sílvia Pereira, Marta Soares, Ana Macedo
{"title":"Characterization and prognosis of very elderly patients with anemia, cardio-cerebrovascular disease, and iron deficiency in four Portuguese hospitals.","authors":"Rita Rego, Margarida Madeira, Eugeniu Gisca, Daniela Brigas, Ana Vigário, Arsénio Barbosa, Sílvia Pereira, Marta Soares, Ana Macedo","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000212","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"e212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10158853/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9799452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}