We attempted to analyze any influences to %T>MIC achievement probability due to the difference of the MIC measurement concentration range of MEPM for 613 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by the Monte Carlo simulation method. As for the analysis, we calculated the achievement probability of 30% and 50% for MEPM %T>MIC by the administration volume of MEPM: 250 mg, 500 mg, and 1,000 mg, the administration time: 0.5 h, and 3 h, the administration frequency: 2 times, and 3 times, and the renal excretion capability: Normal, Slight, Moderate, and High abnormal with the 3 types of MIC concentration measurement level 1) <=0.06~>=256 µg/ml: 13 levels, 2) <=0.5~>=32 µg/ml: 7 levels, and 3) <=1~>=16 µg/ml: 5 levels. As the result, we found the following findings; 1. In terms of the administration of normal renal excretion capability, 250 mg, in comparison with 500 mg and 1,000 mg, indicated the differential due to the difference of MIC measurement concentration range. 2. The administration volume of MEPM 500 mg which has been recommended shown the less differential of the achievement probability due to the difference of MIC measurement concentration range. As the renal excretion was shifted through Normal to Slight to Moderate to High abnormal, the differential of the achievement probability due to the difference of MIC measurement concentration range was gradually decreased. With these results, PK/PD analysis is possible for the 5 levels measurement concentration. It is significant that the facility using the automated microbiology analyzer can provide not only the MIC report, but also the information on the appropriate administration method for antibacterial drug by PK/PD analysis.
{"title":"[Influences of %T>MIC achievement probability due to the difference of the MIC measurement concentration range-analysis of meropenem for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-].","authors":"Zenzo Nagasawa, Yukari Nakashima, Yumiko Fukutomi, Nozomi Uki, Koji Kusaba, Fumio Nagumo, Shoichiro Ohta, Eizaburo Sueoka, Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We attempted to analyze any influences to %T>MIC achievement probability due to the difference of the MIC measurement concentration range of MEPM for 613 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by the Monte Carlo simulation method. As for the analysis, we calculated the achievement probability of 30% and 50% for MEPM %T>MIC by the administration volume of MEPM: 250 mg, 500 mg, and 1,000 mg, the administration time: 0.5 h, and 3 h, the administration frequency: 2 times, and 3 times, and the renal excretion capability: Normal, Slight, Moderate, and High abnormal with the 3 types of MIC concentration measurement level 1) <=0.06~>=256 µg/ml: 13 levels, 2) <=0.5~>=32 µg/ml: 7 levels, and 3) <=1~>=16 µg/ml: 5 levels. As the result, we found the following findings; 1. In terms of the administration of normal renal excretion capability, 250 mg, in comparison with 500 mg and 1,000 mg, indicated the differential due to the difference of MIC measurement concentration range. 2. The administration volume of MEPM 500 mg which has been recommended shown the less differential of the achievement probability due to the difference of MIC measurement concentration range. As the renal excretion was shifted through Normal to Slight to Moderate to High abnormal, the differential of the achievement probability due to the difference of MIC measurement concentration range was gradually decreased. With these results, PK/PD analysis is possible for the 5 levels measurement concentration. It is significant that the facility using the automated microbiology analyzer can provide not only the MIC report, but also the information on the appropriate administration method for antibacterial drug by PK/PD analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"22 1-2","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30475490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Gram stain is an established method for bacterial identification, but the time needed to carry out this stain is 2-3 min. We attempted to shorten this time and stained a total of 70 clinical specimens isolated from using the Bartholomew & Mittwer (B&M) modified or Favor methods with a 3 s duration for washing and staining steps. Results were plotted and analyzed using a Hue Saturation Intensity (HSI) model. The range based on a plot of the two methods with the HSI model was presented as a reference interval. Our results indicated that 100% (35/35) of strains were Gram positive and 97.1% (34/35) were Gram negative for the quick B&M modified method. In the quick Favor method, 80.0% (28/35) were Gram positive and 68.6% (24/35) of strains were Gram negative. We propose that the quick B&M modified method is equivalent to the standard Gram staining method and is superior to the quick Favor method.
{"title":"[Comparison of the quick Gram stain method to the B&M modified and favor methods].","authors":"Kayo Osawa, Nobumasa Kataoka, Toshio Maruo","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Gram stain is an established method for bacterial identification, but the time needed to carry out this stain is 2-3 min. We attempted to shorten this time and stained a total of 70 clinical specimens isolated from using the Bartholomew & Mittwer (B&M) modified or Favor methods with a 3 s duration for washing and staining steps. Results were plotted and analyzed using a Hue Saturation Intensity (HSI) model. The range based on a plot of the two methods with the HSI model was presented as a reference interval. Our results indicated that 100% (35/35) of strains were Gram positive and 97.1% (34/35) were Gram negative for the quick B&M modified method. In the quick Favor method, 80.0% (28/35) were Gram positive and 68.6% (24/35) of strains were Gram negative. We propose that the quick B&M modified method is equivalent to the standard Gram staining method and is superior to the quick Favor method.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"22 1-2","pages":"23-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30475491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"[Rapid microbial ID system based on MALDI TOF MS-MALDI Biotyper-].","authors":"Yumiko Matsuyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"22 1-2","pages":"27-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30475492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A diagnostic test for infection has been developed which uses the culture method but there still remains the issue of non-culturable pathogens. Although genetic testing has emerged as a solution to this problem, it is not yet widely used. There are various reasons for this which includes the gene amplification and analysis methods used as well as the users not being familiar with the selection criteria. In recent years, by using inexpensive instrumentation it has become possible to observe specimens using fluorescent staining and to easily identify the pathogens. Also equipment for gene and protein analysis has been developed that can analyze each level of gene transcription and translation in the expressed proteins. Today, due to the many developments in both analytical methods and instrumentation, major breakthroughs are being made in clinical microbiological testing. That is, first, to classify the infecting microorganism by fluorescent staining and then to identify the microorganism using DNA sequencing and mass spectrometry. In addition, the DNA sequencing and Melting curve analysis methods are used to test for antimicrobial resistance of infectious microorganisms. For non-culturable microbes and the growth response of microbes under stress conditions, the Phenotype-Microarray method is used. Therefore, once the weaknesses of each method are understood, it is possible to provide accurate and timely information to clinicians.
{"title":"[Evolution of infectious disease diagnostic testing and the possible use of genetic testing].","authors":"Kazuyuki Sugahara","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A diagnostic test for infection has been developed which uses the culture method but there still remains the issue of non-culturable pathogens. Although genetic testing has emerged as a solution to this problem, it is not yet widely used. There are various reasons for this which includes the gene amplification and analysis methods used as well as the users not being familiar with the selection criteria. In recent years, by using inexpensive instrumentation it has become possible to observe specimens using fluorescent staining and to easily identify the pathogens. Also equipment for gene and protein analysis has been developed that can analyze each level of gene transcription and translation in the expressed proteins. Today, due to the many developments in both analytical methods and instrumentation, major breakthroughs are being made in clinical microbiological testing. That is, first, to classify the infecting microorganism by fluorescent staining and then to identify the microorganism using DNA sequencing and mass spectrometry. In addition, the DNA sequencing and Melting curve analysis methods are used to test for antimicrobial resistance of infectious microorganisms. For non-culturable microbes and the growth response of microbes under stress conditions, the Phenotype-Microarray method is used. Therefore, once the weaknesses of each method are understood, it is possible to provide accurate and timely information to clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"22 1-2","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30475489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"[Abstracts of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology. June 26, 2010. Gifu, Japan].","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"Suppl ","pages":"15-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29971484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Some automated systems of the identification and susceptibility for microorganisms are used and prevail in hospital laboratories. One of the most serious problems is to perform accurate susceptibility testing for low-level resistant organisms, while antibiotic resistant microbes are increasing in medical fields. To evaluate automated machines for the susceptibility testing, several antibiotic resistant organisms were examined by plural technicians in some laboratories. Each strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycinintermediate S. aureus (VISA), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae was tested by three automated systems of WalkAway, VITEK2/VITEK2 compact and Phoenix for susceptibility. The results for antibiotics generated by the systems were compared to those generated by reference methods according to CLSI guidelines. The results of WalkAway, VITEK2/VITEK2 compact, and Phoenix demonstrated 92%, 91%, and 96% of reproducibilities, 92%, 94%, and 91% of MIC agreements, 0.5%, 0.8%, and 0.3% of very major error (VME) and 0.3%, 1.4%, and 2.3% of major error (ME), respectively. All automated systems had a high reproducibility even under the performance of plural technicians, although the differences of VMEs and MEs were observed among the systems. From these data, the automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing were more useful for the detection of antibiotic resistant organisms by understanding the characteristics of each system.
{"title":"[Comparison of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing with three automated systems for MRSA, VISA, ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae].","authors":"Makiko Kiyosuke, Zenzo Nagasawa, Koji Kusaba, Takayuki Masaki, Hisae Yoshimura, Hiromi To, Tomoko Mitsui, Chiasa Otsubo, Chika Narita, Tsuyoko Morooka, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Ariaki Nagayama","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some automated systems of the identification and susceptibility for microorganisms are used and prevail in hospital laboratories. One of the most serious problems is to perform accurate susceptibility testing for low-level resistant organisms, while antibiotic resistant microbes are increasing in medical fields. To evaluate automated machines for the susceptibility testing, several antibiotic resistant organisms were examined by plural technicians in some laboratories. Each strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycinintermediate S. aureus (VISA), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae was tested by three automated systems of WalkAway, VITEK2/VITEK2 compact and Phoenix for susceptibility. The results for antibiotics generated by the systems were compared to those generated by reference methods according to CLSI guidelines. The results of WalkAway, VITEK2/VITEK2 compact, and Phoenix demonstrated 92%, 91%, and 96% of reproducibilities, 92%, 94%, and 91% of MIC agreements, 0.5%, 0.8%, and 0.3% of very major error (VME) and 0.3%, 1.4%, and 2.3% of major error (ME), respectively. All automated systems had a high reproducibility even under the performance of plural technicians, although the differences of VMEs and MEs were observed among the systems. From these data, the automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing were more useful for the detection of antibiotic resistant organisms by understanding the characteristics of each system.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"21 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29510003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We have analyzed epidemiology of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 in Aichi Medical University hospital. As a result, the characteristics of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 was as follows. (1) The number of ordered rapid diagnostic test was 2.8 times compared with the seasonal influenza period. The number of ordered rapid diagnostic test of the seasonal influenza period had the peak in January to March. However, the peak in pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 was November. Also, the number of samples on the weekend had been more than that of the weekday. (2) Positive rate of each diagnostic kit did not have the difference between the seasonal influenza (31.3 ± 1.8%) and pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 (29.6%). (3) Age on most ordered samples were less than ten years old, and the number of samples in 11 to 20 years old was twice in comparison with the seasonal influenza. (4) Pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 in influenza A accounted for 96.9%. (5) Sensitivity and specificity of ESPLINE Influenza A&B-N (FUJIREBIO, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to the pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 were 100% and 100%, respectively. Also, sensitivity and specificity of prorasuto Flu (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) were 77.3%and 98.5%, respectively.
对爱知医科大学附属医院2009年甲型H1N1流感流行病学进行分析。因此,2009年H1N1大流行性流感的特征如下。(1)订购快速诊断试验次数是季节性流感期的2.8倍。季节性流感期快速诊断检测订货量在1 ~ 3月达到高峰。然而,2009年H1N1大流行性流感的高峰是在11月。此外,周末的样本数量也比工作日多。(2)各诊断试剂盒阳性率在季节性流感(31.3±1.8%)和2009年H1N1大流行性流感(29.6%)之间无显著差异。(3)大部分定购样本年龄在10岁以下,11 ~ 20岁的样本数量是季节性流感的2倍。(4)甲型流感中2009年H1N1大流行性流感占96.9%。(5) ESPLINE Influenza A&B-N (FUJIREBIO, Inc., Tokyo, Japan)对2009年H1N1大流行性流感的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和100%。prorasuto Flu (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan)的敏感性和特异性分别为77.3%和98.5%。
{"title":"[Epidemiology of Pandemic Influenza (H1N1) 2009 in Aichi Medical University Hospital].","authors":"Hiroya Tani, Yuka Yamagishi, Eriko Fuzimaki, Takahiko Kishi, Minehiro Goto, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have analyzed epidemiology of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 in Aichi Medical University hospital. As a result, the characteristics of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 was as follows. (1) The number of ordered rapid diagnostic test was 2.8 times compared with the seasonal influenza period. The number of ordered rapid diagnostic test of the seasonal influenza period had the peak in January to March. However, the peak in pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 was November. Also, the number of samples on the weekend had been more than that of the weekday. (2) Positive rate of each diagnostic kit did not have the difference between the seasonal influenza (31.3 ± 1.8%) and pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 (29.6%). (3) Age on most ordered samples were less than ten years old, and the number of samples in 11 to 20 years old was twice in comparison with the seasonal influenza. (4) Pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 in influenza A accounted for 96.9%. (5) Sensitivity and specificity of ESPLINE Influenza A&B-N (FUJIREBIO, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to the pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 were 100% and 100%, respectively. Also, sensitivity and specificity of prorasuto Flu (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) were 77.3%and 98.5%, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"21 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29510004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MicroScan Rapid plus Neg II Series and MicroScan Rapid plus Pos Series by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics K.K. are the panels which enable to measure identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing quickly and we have confirmed that it is useful for detecting drug resistance bacteria. As the identification result of comparing Rapid plus series with the current panel by using 143 strains of various drug resistance bacteria, Gram positive cocci was 87. 7%, glucose fermenter was 100% and glucose non-fermenter was 77.3 in Gram negative bacilli. On the evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Rapid plus series, in comparison with the current panel, confirmed the lower tendency of MIC value on some drugs, but it basically presented the good concordance rate. In terms of the reporting time of antimicrobial agent, non-fermenter or MRCNS reported the result as needed after 8 hours and it took a little longer time for the report of antimicrobial agent. On the other hand, 80% or higher of antimicrobial agent on panel was reported for intestinal bacteria in 4.5 hours and for MRSA in 6.5 hours. It enabled to report the testing result on the same day. Due to the results above, Rapid plus series was highly valued on the usability, such as the early detection of drug resistance bacteria and the selection of therapeutic agents.
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics K.K.的MicroScan Rapid plus Neg II系列和MicroScan Rapid plus Pos系列是能够快速测量鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性测试的面板,我们已经证实它对检测耐药细菌很有用。用143株不同耐药菌对Rapid plus系列与current panel进行鉴定,革兰氏阳性球菌为87株。革兰阴性杆菌中葡萄糖发酵菌为100%,葡萄糖非发酵菌为77.3。在药敏试验评价上,Rapid plus系列与当前panel相比,确认了部分药物的MIC值有较低的趋势,但基本呈现出较好的一致性。在抗菌剂报告时间方面,非发酵罐或MRCNS在8小时后按需报告结果,而抗菌剂报告时间稍长。另一方面,肠道细菌的抗菌药物在4.5小时内达到80%或更高,MRSA在6.5小时内达到80%或更高。可以在当天报告检测结果。基于以上结果,Rapid plus系列在可用性方面受到高度评价,如耐药菌的早期发现和治疗剂的选择。
{"title":"[Clinical significance on MicroScan Rapid plus series using various antibiotic-resistant bacteria].","authors":"Yumiko Fukutomi, Nozomu Uki, Megumi Oho, Mitsuhiko Sugimati, Kouji Kusaba, Zenzo Nagasawa, Yukari Nakajima, Asami Hukuoka, Yousuke Aoki, Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MicroScan Rapid plus Neg II Series and MicroScan Rapid plus Pos Series by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics K.K. are the panels which enable to measure identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing quickly and we have confirmed that it is useful for detecting drug resistance bacteria. As the identification result of comparing Rapid plus series with the current panel by using 143 strains of various drug resistance bacteria, Gram positive cocci was 87. 7%, glucose fermenter was 100% and glucose non-fermenter was 77.3 in Gram negative bacilli. On the evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Rapid plus series, in comparison with the current panel, confirmed the lower tendency of MIC value on some drugs, but it basically presented the good concordance rate. In terms of the reporting time of antimicrobial agent, non-fermenter or MRCNS reported the result as needed after 8 hours and it took a little longer time for the report of antimicrobial agent. On the other hand, 80% or higher of antimicrobial agent on panel was reported for intestinal bacteria in 4.5 hours and for MRSA in 6.5 hours. It enabled to report the testing result on the same day. Due to the results above, Rapid plus series was highly valued on the usability, such as the early detection of drug resistance bacteria and the selection of therapeutic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"21 2","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30265280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
(1) Early diagnosis of adenovirus infection helps physicians to relieve anxiety of guardians as it enables them to provide appropriate information on natural course and prognosis of the infection. In addition, it reduces unnecessary antibiotic use, which is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria. (2) Diagnostic accuracy in adenovirus infection could be improved by selection of patient prior to antigen detection test based on detailed history, local epidemic situation and actively performed blood test. (3) Positive rate of adenovirus antigen detection depends on the day of illness when it is performed and sampling technique. Vigorous rubbing of pharynx and tonsil to an extent that nausea or vomiting is induced is a clue to the collection of appropriate samples. (4) Recently released rapid adenovirus antigen detection kits are considered to be more useful than their old versions because of better sensitivity and shorter examination time. However, their usefulness in early diagnosis is limited, as they sometimes produce false-negative results at very early stage or in patients lacking symptoms other than fever.
{"title":"[Adenovirus infection and rapid adenovirus antigen detection kits].","authors":"Kanji Sakamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Early diagnosis of adenovirus infection helps physicians to relieve anxiety of guardians as it enables them to provide appropriate information on natural course and prognosis of the infection. In addition, it reduces unnecessary antibiotic use, which is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria. (2) Diagnostic accuracy in adenovirus infection could be improved by selection of patient prior to antigen detection test based on detailed history, local epidemic situation and actively performed blood test. (3) Positive rate of adenovirus antigen detection depends on the day of illness when it is performed and sampling technique. Vigorous rubbing of pharynx and tonsil to an extent that nausea or vomiting is induced is a clue to the collection of appropriate samples. (4) Recently released rapid adenovirus antigen detection kits are considered to be more useful than their old versions because of better sensitivity and shorter examination time. However, their usefulness in early diagnosis is limited, as they sometimes produce false-negative results at very early stage or in patients lacking symptoms other than fever.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"21 1","pages":"21-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29510005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Procalcitonin (PCT) is a novel biomarker for diagnosis and severity evaluation of bacterial sepsis. PCT measurement methods provided by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. include a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay system SphereLight Wako and fully automated immunoanalyzer microTASWako i30 for a quantitative measurement, and immunochromatographic assay method, B R A H M S PCT-Q kit. This time, basic performance of SphereLight Wako and microTASWako i30 was evaluated as quantitative determination methods for PCT. The lower limit of detection for the both methods was 0.02 ng/ml. Correlation coefficients of 0.993 to 0.997 indicated good correlation between the two methods. The both methods allow quick and easy measurement of PCT, therefore they are helpful for diagnosis and severity evaluation of bacterial sepsis.
降钙素原(PCT)是一种诊断和评估细菌性败血症严重程度的新型生物标志物。Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.提供的PCT测量方法包括全自动化学发光免疫分析系统SphereLight Wako和用于定量测量的全自动免疫分析仪microTASWako i30,以及免疫层析分析方法,B R a H M S PCT- q试剂盒。本次将SphereLight Wako和microTASWako i30作为PCT的定量检测方法进行基本性能评价,两种方法的检测下限均为0.02 ng/ml。相关系数为0.993 ~ 0.997,表明两种方法相关性较好。两种方法均能快速简便地测定PCT,有助于细菌性脓毒症的诊断和严重程度评价。
{"title":"[Evaluation of measurement method of a bacterial sepsis marker, procalcitonin].","authors":"Shoko Adachi, Koichi Nakao","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Procalcitonin (PCT) is a novel biomarker for diagnosis and severity evaluation of bacterial sepsis. PCT measurement methods provided by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. include a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay system SphereLight Wako and fully automated immunoanalyzer microTASWako i30 for a quantitative measurement, and immunochromatographic assay method, B R A H M S PCT-Q kit. This time, basic performance of SphereLight Wako and microTASWako i30 was evaluated as quantitative determination methods for PCT. The lower limit of detection for the both methods was 0.02 ng/ml. Correlation coefficients of 0.993 to 0.997 indicated good correlation between the two methods. The both methods allow quick and easy measurement of PCT, therefore they are helpful for diagnosis and severity evaluation of bacterial sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"21 2","pages":"107-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"30265281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}