As the reagent that can simultaneously detect bacterial nucleic acid/drug-resistant genes from the culture-positive liquid of blood cultures, Verigene® system includes the Verigene® Gram-Positive Blood Culture test (BC-GP) and the Verigene® Gram Negative Blood Culture test (BC-GN). This study used BC-GN to identify the names of bacteria from stock strains, urine samples, and sputum specimens and detect drug-resistant genes. The stock strains included 28 clinical isolates, 9 urine samples in which the target bacterial strain grew to 106CFU/ml or more in culture, and 9 sputum specimens in which the target bacterial strain grew to 105CFU/ml or more in culture. The bacterial identification and detection of drug-resistant genes used quality Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis and conventional PCR method, respectively, followed in comparison with the results of Verigene®. As a result, the measurement results of Verigene® for the stock strains and urine samples had a high concordance rate with MALDI-TOF MS analysis and PCR method. On the other hand, the concordance rate of the sputum specimens with the Verigene® measurement results was only 40% (4 out of 10 specimens). These results suggest that BC‒GN can be an effective tool for AMR rapid diagnosis if the measurement target includes not only bacterial strains in the culture-positive liquid of blood cultures, but also other bacterial strains and urine.
{"title":"[Is BC-GN applicable for analysis of strains and urine/sputum specimens?]","authors":"Tomoko Ohno, Hiroyuki Suematsu, Yuka Yamagishi, Narimi Miyazaki, Atsuko Yamada, Yuzuka Kawamoto, Daisuke Sakanashi, Isao Koita, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the reagent that can simultaneously detect bacterial nucleic acid/drug-resistant genes from the culture-positive liquid of blood cultures, Verigene<sup>®</sup> system includes the Verigene<sup>®</sup> Gram-Positive Blood Culture test (BC-GP) and the Verigene<sup>®</sup> Gram Negative Blood Culture test (BC-GN). This study used BC-GN to identify the names of bacteria from stock strains, urine samples, and sputum specimens and detect drug-resistant genes. The stock strains included 28 clinical isolates, 9 urine samples in which the target bacterial strain grew to 106CFU/ml or more in culture, and 9 sputum specimens in which the target bacterial strain grew to 105CFU/ml or more in culture. The bacterial identification and detection of drug-resistant genes used quality Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis and conventional PCR method, respectively, followed in comparison with the results of Verigene<sup>®</sup>. As a result, the measurement results of Verigene<sup>®</sup> for the stock strains and urine samples had a high concordance rate with MALDI-TOF MS analysis and PCR method. On the other hand, the concordance rate of the sputum specimens with the Verigene<sup>®</sup> measurement results was only 40% (4 out of 10 specimens). These results suggest that BC‒GN can be an effective tool for AMR rapid diagnosis if the measurement target includes not only bacterial strains in the culture-positive liquid of blood cultures, but also other bacterial strains and urine.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"28 2","pages":"91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36853099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliable detection and typing of carbapenemase is important in the treatment of infectious diseases. In this study we newly designed LAMP primer based on the latest information, and established a detection method for Carbapenemase Big five gene. For DNA extraction from strains, alkaline boiling method and commercial kit were used. The reaction temperatures of the LAMP method was VIM: 65°C, NDM: 63°C, KPC: 65°C, OXA-48-like: 65°C, IMP: 61°C. And simultaneous LAMP method was at 63°C, for 60 min. It was possible to detect up to 103 copies/ml. The reactivity of LAMP using 36 strains verified by Multiplex-PCR was VIM (4/4: number of LAMP method positive strains/number of strains evaluated), NDM (2/2), KPC (4/4), OXA-48-like (4/4), IMP (17/17). The type of carbapenemase determined by the LAMP method were all consistent with multiplex PCR. All strains were detected within 30 min. In VIM, both VIM-1-like and VIM-2-like were able to detect. In this study, although the number and variation of the strains evaluated was limited, LAMP method was clinically useful as a simple and rapid carbapenemase detection method.
{"title":"[A trial of simple and rapid carbapenemase big five gene analysis using LAMP method].","authors":"Yumiko Funashima, Kazuyuki Sugahara, Yuya Hirata, Kyohei Kato, Kenichi Sato, Yasuharu Sasaki, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable detection and typing of carbapenemase is important in the treatment of infectious diseases. In this study we newly designed LAMP primer based on the latest information, and established a detection method for Carbapenemase Big five gene. For DNA extraction from strains, alkaline boiling method and commercial kit were used. The reaction temperatures of the LAMP method was VIM: 65°C, NDM: 63°C, KPC: 65°C, OXA-48-like: 65°C, IMP: 61°C. And simultaneous LAMP method was at 63°C, for 60 min. It was possible to detect up to 10<sup>3</sup> copies/ml. The reactivity of LAMP using 36 strains verified by Multiplex-PCR was VIM (4/4: number of LAMP method positive strains/number of strains evaluated), NDM (2/2), KPC (4/4), OXA-48-like (4/4), IMP (17/17). The type of carbapenemase determined by the LAMP method were all consistent with multiplex PCR. All strains were detected within 30 min. In VIM, both VIM-1-like and VIM-2-like were able to detect. In this study, although the number and variation of the strains evaluated was limited, LAMP method was clinically useful as a simple and rapid carbapenemase detection method.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"28 2","pages":"77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36853097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In order to develop a new method to detect β-lactamase, we determined degradation of β-lactam antibiotics, ampicillin sodium (ABPC) and cefotaxime sodium (CTX), by β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) in terms of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Using HPLC with an ODS column and an eluent composed of phosphate buffer and methanol, we could detect ABPC and CTX within 10 min. After cultured with K. pneumoniae, ABPC and CTX were degraded. The degradation rate corresponding to the rate of peak area incubated with and without bacteria increased with increasing McFarland No. of bacterial suspension and incubation time. Under the culture condition of McFarland No. 3.0 and 90-min incubation, the degradation rate of ABPC and CTX was 52.6 and 70.8% by K. pneumoniae, whereas it was less than 10% by susceptible bacteria. Consequently, these results confirmed that β-lactamase produced by ABPC- and CTX-resistant bacteria could be detected within about 120 min through HPLC measurement.
{"title":"[Detection of β-Lactamase Produced by <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography].","authors":"Rika Narashima, Yuya Hasunuma, Yoshikazu Tokuoka","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to develop a new method to detect β-lactamase, we determined degradation of β-lactam antibiotics, ampicillin sodium (ABPC) and cefotaxime sodium (CTX), by β-lactamase-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (<i>K. pneumoniae</i>) in terms of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Using HPLC with an ODS column and an eluent composed of phosphate buffer and methanol, we could detect ABPC and CTX within 10 min. After cultured with <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, ABPC and CTX were degraded. The degradation rate corresponding to the rate of peak area incubated with and without bacteria increased with increasing McFarland No. of bacterial suspension and incubation time. Under the culture condition of McFarland No. 3.0 and 90-min incubation, the degradation rate of ABPC and CTX was 52.6 and 70.8% by <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, whereas it was less than 10% by susceptible bacteria. Consequently, these results confirmed that β-lactamase produced by ABPC- and CTX-resistant bacteria could be detected within about 120 min through HPLC measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35934132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Legionella pneumophila, the causative agent of Legionnaires' disease, was first recognized in 1977 following an epidemic of acute pneumonia in Philadelphia, USA. Since then, a total of 59 Legionella species containing 80 serogroups have been characterized. Twenty-six of the Legionella species have been reported as pathogenic in humans. This review describes the microbiological characteristics of Legionella species, their habits in the environment, the source and route of infection, symptoms and diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease, and disease outbreaks in Japan.
{"title":"[Legionnaires' Disease Update].","authors":"Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Legionella pneumophila</i>, the causative agent of Legionnaires' disease, was first recognized in 1977 following an epidemic of acute pneumonia in Philadelphia, USA. Since then, a total of 59 <i>Legionella</i> species containing 80 serogroups have been characterized. Twenty-six of the <i>Legionella</i> species have been reported as pathogenic in humans. This review describes the microbiological characteristics of <i>Legionella</i> species, their habits in the environment, the source and route of infection, symptoms and diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease, and disease outbreaks in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35934130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In recent years, the appearance of MALDI-TOF MS made it possible to identify bacterial species in a short time. However, the sensitivity test has not largely shortened the time. When ESBL is suspected by routine examination, we speculate that there are many institutions conducting the inspection method conforming to the CLSI inspection procedure. When carrying out bacteria identification, susceptibility test and ESBL confirmation test from blood culture-positive specimens, the expected examination days are required for about 3 to 4 days, which is not quick. We report on bacterial species identification by MALDI-TOF MS from blood culture positive specimen bottle and ESBL rapid decision with fully automated urine analyzer.
{"title":"[Rapid Decision of ESBL from Blood Culture Positive Bottles (Using MALDI-TOF MS and Sysmex UF-5000)].","authors":"Takenori Yamashita","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the appearance of MALDI-TOF MS made it possible to identify bacterial species in a short time. However, the sensitivity test has not largely shortened the time. When ESBL is suspected by routine examination, we speculate that there are many institutions conducting the inspection method conforming to the CLSI inspection procedure. When carrying out bacteria identification, susceptibility test and ESBL confirmation test from blood culture-positive specimens, the expected examination days are required for about 3 to 4 days, which is not quick. We report on bacterial species identification by MALDI-TOF MS from blood culture positive specimen bottle and ESBL rapid decision with fully automated urine analyzer.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35934131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mitsumasa Saito, Yasuhiko Nikaido, Masahiro Matsumoto, Midori Ogawa, Sharon Y A M Villanueva
Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. The severity of leptospirosis vary from mild, flu-like disease to a more severe form, Weil's disease causing jaundice, hemorrhage, renal failure, and even death. Every year, 300,000‒500,000 cases of severe leptospirosis are reported around the world, with the case fatality rate being 10‒30%. The usual diagnostic tools for leptospirosis are 1) direct observation of leptospires in blood and urine under dark-field microscope, 2) isolation of leptospires from blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or urine samples by culture, 3) microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-Leptospira antibodies in serum, and 4) PCR to detect Leptospira DNA. At presents, the gold standards for diagnosis are culture isolation and MAT. However, it is actually not easy to isolate leptospires from clinical samples. On the other hand, it takes several days before the results of MAT become positive after the onset of illness. Moreover, MAT requires skilled handling, and also needs the maintenance of live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups. Hence other simple or rapid diagnostic tests are needed at the bedside. The micro capsule agglutination test (MCAT) to detect antibody and immunochromatographic assay to detect urinary antigen are currently in the research and development phases. In this paper, the characteristics of each diagnostic test for leptospirosis are described.
{"title":"[The Current Status of Diagnostic Tools for Leptospirosis].","authors":"Mitsumasa Saito, Yasuhiko Nikaido, Masahiro Matsumoto, Midori Ogawa, Sharon Y A M Villanueva","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by pathogenic <i>Leptospira</i> spp. The severity of leptospirosis vary from mild, flu-like disease to a more severe form, Weil's disease causing jaundice, hemorrhage, renal failure, and even death. Every year, 300,000‒500,000 cases of severe leptospirosis are reported around the world, with the case fatality rate being 10‒30%. The usual diagnostic tools for leptospirosis are 1) direct observation of leptospires in blood and urine under dark-field microscope, 2) isolation of leptospires from blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or urine samples by culture, 3) microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-<i>Leptospira</i> antibodies in serum, and 4) PCR to detect Leptospira DNA. At presents, the gold standards for diagnosis are culture isolation and MAT. However, it is actually not easy to isolate leptospires from clinical samples. On the other hand, it takes several days before the results of MAT become positive after the onset of illness. Moreover, MAT requires skilled handling, and also needs the maintenance of live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups. Hence other simple or rapid diagnostic tests are needed at the bedside. The micro capsule agglutination test (MCAT) to detect antibody and immunochromatographic assay to detect urinary antigen are currently in the research and development phases. In this paper, the characteristics of each diagnostic test for leptospirosis are described.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35331752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods for susceptibility tests of yeast are used in Japan. On the other hand, the methods have some disadvantage; 1) reading at 24 and 48 h, 2) using unclear scale, approximately 50% inhibition, to determine MICs, 3) calculating trailing growth and paradoxical effects. These makes it difficult to test the susuceptibility for yeasts. Old software of RAISUS, Ver. 6.0 series, resolved problem 1) and 2) but did not resolve problem 3). Recently, new software of RAISUS, Ver. 7.0 series, resolved problem 3). We confirmed that using the new software made it clear whether all these issue were settled or not. Eighty-four Candida isolated from Aichi Medical University was used in this study. We compared the MICs obtained by using RAISUS antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts RSMY1, RSMY1, with those obtained by using ASTY. The concordance rates (±four-fold of MICs) between the MICs obtained by using ASTY and RSMY1 with the new software were more than 90%, except for miconazole (MCZ). The rate of MCZ was low, but MICs obtained by using CLSI methods and Yeast-like Fungus DP 'EIKEN' methods, E-DP, showed equivalent MICs of RSMY1 using the new software. The frequency of skip effects on RSMY1 using the new software markedly decreased relative to RSMY1 using the old software. In case of showing trailing growth, the new software of RAISUS made it possible to choice the correct MICs and to put up the sign of trailing growth on the result screen. New software of RAISUS enhances its usability and the accuracy of MICs. Using automatic instrument to determine MICs is useful to obtain objective results easily.
{"title":"[Confirming the Utility of RAISUS Antifungal Susceptibility Testing by New-Software].","authors":"Tomoko Ono, Hiroyuki Suematsu, Haruki Sawamura, Yuka Yamagishi, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods for susceptibility tests of yeast are used in Japan. On the other hand, the methods have some disadvantage; 1) reading at 24 and 48 h, 2) using unclear scale, approximately 50% inhibition, to determine MICs, 3) calculating trailing growth and paradoxical effects. These makes it difficult to test the susuceptibility for yeasts. Old software of RAISUS, Ver. 6.0 series, resolved problem 1) and 2) but did not resolve problem 3). Recently, new software of RAISUS, Ver. 7.0 series, resolved problem 3). We confirmed that using the new software made it clear whether all these issue were settled or not. Eighty-four Candida isolated from Aichi Medical University was used in this study. We compared the MICs obtained by using RAISUS antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts RSMY1, RSMY1, with those obtained by using ASTY. The concordance rates (±four-fold of MICs) between the MICs obtained by using ASTY and RSMY1 with the new software were more than 90%, except for miconazole (MCZ). The rate of MCZ was low, but MICs obtained by using CLSI methods and Yeast-like Fungus DP 'EIKEN' methods, E-DP, showed equivalent MICs of RSMY1 using the new software. The frequency of skip effects on RSMY1 using the new software markedly decreased relative to RSMY1 using the old software. In case of showing trailing growth, the new software of RAISUS made it possible to choice the correct MICs and to put up the sign of trailing growth on the result screen. New software of RAISUS enhances its usability and the accuracy of MICs. Using automatic instrument to determine MICs is useful to obtain objective results easily.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35331750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification of bacteria of sepsis or bacteremia is a useful result for treatment policy. In recent years, bacterial identification has become possible from blood culture bottles by MALDI‒TOF, but it is not as accurate as bacterial identification from agar colonies. Blood culture pretreatment kit (MALDI Sepcityper Kit) is currently on sale from Bruker. However, the current situation has not reached good accuracy. This time, a new blood culture pretreatment kit appeared, so I studied. Up to now, the blood culture pretreatment kit was only MALDI Sepcityper Kit using enzyme digestion method. Rapid BAC pro (Nittobo) is a pretreatment kit using nanomaterials. This time, comparison examination (total number 40 samples) was done. Among them, 33 specimens were identified by MALDI Sepcityper Kit. There were 21 specimens that could be identified by rapid BAC pro. In this study, rapid BAC pro did not show superior results over MALDI Sepcityper Kit.
{"title":"[MALDI-TOF MS Comparison of Blood Culture Positive Bottle Pretreatment Kit].","authors":"Takenori Yamashita","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of bacteria of sepsis or bacteremia is a useful result for treatment policy. In recent years, bacterial identification has become possible from blood culture bottles by MALDI‒TOF, but it is not as accurate as bacterial identification from agar colonies. Blood culture pretreatment kit (MALDI Sepcityper Kit) is currently on sale from Bruker. However, the current situation has not reached good accuracy. This time, a new blood culture pretreatment kit appeared, so I studied. Up to now, the blood culture pretreatment kit was only MALDI Sepcityper Kit using enzyme digestion method. Rapid BAC pro (Nittobo) is a pretreatment kit using nanomaterials. This time, comparison examination (total number 40 samples) was done. Among them, 33 specimens were identified by MALDI Sepcityper Kit. There were 21 specimens that could be identified by rapid BAC pro. In this study, rapid BAC pro did not show superior results over MALDI Sepcityper Kit.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"73-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35420694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Urinary antigen test is frequently used as a routine laboratory test for early diagnosis of Legionella infection, which is especially suitable for ordinary Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, but not for other types of Legionella. We report a case of severe pneumonia caused by Legionella longbeachae, where a method of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay contributed an important role for the early detection. This case involved an 83-year-old man who developed fever, dyspnea, and productive cough. Since the medication of prescribed ceftriaxone had not been effective, he visited the emergency room of our hospital, where an X-ray revealed a severe pneumonia harboring a consolidation with air bronchogram in his right lower lung. His sputum and urine were subjected to the routine bacterial culture or the urinary antigen test for Legionella, which initially brought negative results. However, a positive result of LAMP assay enabled early diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia. Later, the bacterial cultures of sputum made some progress and 16S rRNA sequencing provided a proof of L. longbeachae. This LAMP assay may bring a benefit for the patients with Legionella pneumonia by enabling early detection of not only specific L. pneumophila serogroup 1, but also of the other Legionella species.
{"title":"[A Case of Severe <i>Legionella longbeachae</i> Pneumonia and Usefulness of LAMP Assay].","authors":"Kumiko Matsushita, Kohei Hijikuro, Shohei Arita, Yu Kaneko, Masahiro Isozaki","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urinary antigen test is frequently used as a routine laboratory test for early diagnosis of <i>Legionella infection</i>, which is especially suitable for ordinary <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> serogroup 1, but not for other types of <i>Legionella</i>. We report a case of severe pneumonia caused by <i>Legionella longbeachae</i>, where a method of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay contributed an important role for the early detection. This case involved an 83-year-old man who developed fever, dyspnea, and productive cough. Since the medication of prescribed ceftriaxone had not been effective, he visited the emergency room of our hospital, where an X-ray revealed a severe pneumonia harboring a consolidation with air bronchogram in his right lower lung. His sputum and urine were subjected to the routine bacterial culture or the urinary antigen test for <i>Legionella</i>, which initially brought negative results. However, a positive result of LAMP assay enabled early diagnosis of <i>Legionella pneumonia</i>. Later, the bacterial cultures of sputum made some progress and 16S rRNA sequencing provided a proof of <i>L. longbeachae</i>. This LAMP assay may bring a benefit for the patients with <i>Legionella pneumonia</i> by enabling early detection of not only specific <i>L. pneumophila</i> serogroup 1, but also of the other <i>Legionella</i> species.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35331751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We have evaluated a new immunochromatographic kit, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB", which had been developed for enhanced detection of influenza B viruses. Five strains of influenza A and B viruses were tested for reactivity and detection limits of the kit. Compared with the detection limits of commercially available kit of QuickNavi-Flu, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" showed a nearly equal reactivity to influenza A viruses, but quadruple reactivity to 2 influenza B viruses. Also, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" exhibited high specificity when tested in 130 influenza-negative culture specimens derived from 24 adult volunteers. Furthermore, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" was clinically evaluated by using 866 specimens, including 190 nasal swabs, 201 nasal aspirations, 262 self-blown nasal discharges, and 213 pharyngeal swabs. Compared with the results of QuickNavi-Flu for influenza A, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 92.0%, 95.0%, and 94.8%, respectively. Whereas, as to influenza B, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 96.3%, 98.5%, 96.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. Similarly, compared with the results of influenza A viral culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 95.3%, 91.0%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding influenza B culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 97.5%, 95.1%, 91.5%, respectively. Overall, we concluded that the "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" is useful and suitable for diagnosis of influenza A and especially influenza B.
{"title":"[Evaluation of a new immunochromatographic kit for enhanced detection of influenza B virus].","authors":"Yasushi Ashikawa, Yoshio Takasaki, Shizuo Shindo, Yuji Yamashita, Keigo Shibao, Takashi Yokoyama, Takato Yokoyama, Minako Iwaya, Yumi Kiyomatsu, Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have evaluated a new immunochromatographic kit, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\", which had been developed for enhanced detection of influenza B viruses. Five strains of influenza A and B viruses were tested for reactivity and detection limits of the kit. Compared with the detection limits of commercially available kit of QuickNavi-Flu, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" showed a nearly equal reactivity to influenza A viruses, but quadruple reactivity to 2 influenza B viruses. Also, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" exhibited high specificity when tested in 130 influenza-negative culture specimens derived from 24 adult volunteers. Furthermore, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" was clinically evaluated by using 866 specimens, including 190 nasal swabs, 201 nasal aspirations, 262 self-blown nasal discharges, and 213 pharyngeal swabs. Compared with the results of QuickNavi-Flu for influenza A, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 92.0%, 95.0%, and 94.8%, respectively. Whereas, as to influenza B, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 96.3%, 98.5%, 96.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. Similarly, compared with the results of influenza A viral culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 95.3%, 91.0%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding influenza B culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 97.5%, 95.1%, 91.5%, respectively. Overall, we concluded that the \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" is useful and suitable for diagnosis of influenza A and especially influenza B.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34795135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}