In recent years, the appearance of MALDI-TOF MS made it possible to identify bacterial species in a short time. However, the sensitivity test has not largely shortened the time. When ESBL is suspected by routine examination, we speculate that there are many institutions conducting the inspection method conforming to the CLSI inspection procedure. When carrying out bacteria identification, susceptibility test and ESBL confirmation test from blood culture-positive specimens, the expected examination days are required for about 3 to 4 days, which is not quick. We report on bacterial species identification by MALDI-TOF MS from blood culture positive specimen bottle and ESBL rapid decision with fully automated urine analyzer.
{"title":"[Rapid Decision of ESBL from Blood Culture Positive Bottles (Using MALDI-TOF MS and Sysmex UF-5000)].","authors":"Takenori Yamashita","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, the appearance of MALDI-TOF MS made it possible to identify bacterial species in a short time. However, the sensitivity test has not largely shortened the time. When ESBL is suspected by routine examination, we speculate that there are many institutions conducting the inspection method conforming to the CLSI inspection procedure. When carrying out bacteria identification, susceptibility test and ESBL confirmation test from blood culture-positive specimens, the expected examination days are required for about 3 to 4 days, which is not quick. We report on bacterial species identification by MALDI-TOF MS from blood culture positive specimen bottle and ESBL rapid decision with fully automated urine analyzer.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35934131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mitsumasa Saito, Yasuhiko Nikaido, Masahiro Matsumoto, Midori Ogawa, Sharon Y A M Villanueva
Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. The severity of leptospirosis vary from mild, flu-like disease to a more severe form, Weil's disease causing jaundice, hemorrhage, renal failure, and even death. Every year, 300,000‒500,000 cases of severe leptospirosis are reported around the world, with the case fatality rate being 10‒30%. The usual diagnostic tools for leptospirosis are 1) direct observation of leptospires in blood and urine under dark-field microscope, 2) isolation of leptospires from blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or urine samples by culture, 3) microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-Leptospira antibodies in serum, and 4) PCR to detect Leptospira DNA. At presents, the gold standards for diagnosis are culture isolation and MAT. However, it is actually not easy to isolate leptospires from clinical samples. On the other hand, it takes several days before the results of MAT become positive after the onset of illness. Moreover, MAT requires skilled handling, and also needs the maintenance of live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups. Hence other simple or rapid diagnostic tests are needed at the bedside. The micro capsule agglutination test (MCAT) to detect antibody and immunochromatographic assay to detect urinary antigen are currently in the research and development phases. In this paper, the characteristics of each diagnostic test for leptospirosis are described.
{"title":"[The Current Status of Diagnostic Tools for Leptospirosis].","authors":"Mitsumasa Saito, Yasuhiko Nikaido, Masahiro Matsumoto, Midori Ogawa, Sharon Y A M Villanueva","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by pathogenic <i>Leptospira</i> spp. The severity of leptospirosis vary from mild, flu-like disease to a more severe form, Weil's disease causing jaundice, hemorrhage, renal failure, and even death. Every year, 300,000‒500,000 cases of severe leptospirosis are reported around the world, with the case fatality rate being 10‒30%. The usual diagnostic tools for leptospirosis are 1) direct observation of leptospires in blood and urine under dark-field microscope, 2) isolation of leptospires from blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or urine samples by culture, 3) microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-<i>Leptospira</i> antibodies in serum, and 4) PCR to detect Leptospira DNA. At presents, the gold standards for diagnosis are culture isolation and MAT. However, it is actually not easy to isolate leptospires from clinical samples. On the other hand, it takes several days before the results of MAT become positive after the onset of illness. Moreover, MAT requires skilled handling, and also needs the maintenance of live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups. Hence other simple or rapid diagnostic tests are needed at the bedside. The micro capsule agglutination test (MCAT) to detect antibody and immunochromatographic assay to detect urinary antigen are currently in the research and development phases. In this paper, the characteristics of each diagnostic test for leptospirosis are described.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35331752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods for susceptibility tests of yeast are used in Japan. On the other hand, the methods have some disadvantage; 1) reading at 24 and 48 h, 2) using unclear scale, approximately 50% inhibition, to determine MICs, 3) calculating trailing growth and paradoxical effects. These makes it difficult to test the susuceptibility for yeasts. Old software of RAISUS, Ver. 6.0 series, resolved problem 1) and 2) but did not resolve problem 3). Recently, new software of RAISUS, Ver. 7.0 series, resolved problem 3). We confirmed that using the new software made it clear whether all these issue were settled or not. Eighty-four Candida isolated from Aichi Medical University was used in this study. We compared the MICs obtained by using RAISUS antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts RSMY1, RSMY1, with those obtained by using ASTY. The concordance rates (±four-fold of MICs) between the MICs obtained by using ASTY and RSMY1 with the new software were more than 90%, except for miconazole (MCZ). The rate of MCZ was low, but MICs obtained by using CLSI methods and Yeast-like Fungus DP 'EIKEN' methods, E-DP, showed equivalent MICs of RSMY1 using the new software. The frequency of skip effects on RSMY1 using the new software markedly decreased relative to RSMY1 using the old software. In case of showing trailing growth, the new software of RAISUS made it possible to choice the correct MICs and to put up the sign of trailing growth on the result screen. New software of RAISUS enhances its usability and the accuracy of MICs. Using automatic instrument to determine MICs is useful to obtain objective results easily.
{"title":"[Confirming the Utility of RAISUS Antifungal Susceptibility Testing by New-Software].","authors":"Tomoko Ono, Hiroyuki Suematsu, Haruki Sawamura, Yuka Yamagishi, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods for susceptibility tests of yeast are used in Japan. On the other hand, the methods have some disadvantage; 1) reading at 24 and 48 h, 2) using unclear scale, approximately 50% inhibition, to determine MICs, 3) calculating trailing growth and paradoxical effects. These makes it difficult to test the susuceptibility for yeasts. Old software of RAISUS, Ver. 6.0 series, resolved problem 1) and 2) but did not resolve problem 3). Recently, new software of RAISUS, Ver. 7.0 series, resolved problem 3). We confirmed that using the new software made it clear whether all these issue were settled or not. Eighty-four Candida isolated from Aichi Medical University was used in this study. We compared the MICs obtained by using RAISUS antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts RSMY1, RSMY1, with those obtained by using ASTY. The concordance rates (±four-fold of MICs) between the MICs obtained by using ASTY and RSMY1 with the new software were more than 90%, except for miconazole (MCZ). The rate of MCZ was low, but MICs obtained by using CLSI methods and Yeast-like Fungus DP 'EIKEN' methods, E-DP, showed equivalent MICs of RSMY1 using the new software. The frequency of skip effects on RSMY1 using the new software markedly decreased relative to RSMY1 using the old software. In case of showing trailing growth, the new software of RAISUS made it possible to choice the correct MICs and to put up the sign of trailing growth on the result screen. New software of RAISUS enhances its usability and the accuracy of MICs. Using automatic instrument to determine MICs is useful to obtain objective results easily.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35331750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification of bacteria of sepsis or bacteremia is a useful result for treatment policy. In recent years, bacterial identification has become possible from blood culture bottles by MALDI‒TOF, but it is not as accurate as bacterial identification from agar colonies. Blood culture pretreatment kit (MALDI Sepcityper Kit) is currently on sale from Bruker. However, the current situation has not reached good accuracy. This time, a new blood culture pretreatment kit appeared, so I studied. Up to now, the blood culture pretreatment kit was only MALDI Sepcityper Kit using enzyme digestion method. Rapid BAC pro (Nittobo) is a pretreatment kit using nanomaterials. This time, comparison examination (total number 40 samples) was done. Among them, 33 specimens were identified by MALDI Sepcityper Kit. There were 21 specimens that could be identified by rapid BAC pro. In this study, rapid BAC pro did not show superior results over MALDI Sepcityper Kit.
{"title":"[MALDI-TOF MS Comparison of Blood Culture Positive Bottle Pretreatment Kit].","authors":"Takenori Yamashita","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of bacteria of sepsis or bacteremia is a useful result for treatment policy. In recent years, bacterial identification has become possible from blood culture bottles by MALDI‒TOF, but it is not as accurate as bacterial identification from agar colonies. Blood culture pretreatment kit (MALDI Sepcityper Kit) is currently on sale from Bruker. However, the current situation has not reached good accuracy. This time, a new blood culture pretreatment kit appeared, so I studied. Up to now, the blood culture pretreatment kit was only MALDI Sepcityper Kit using enzyme digestion method. Rapid BAC pro (Nittobo) is a pretreatment kit using nanomaterials. This time, comparison examination (total number 40 samples) was done. Among them, 33 specimens were identified by MALDI Sepcityper Kit. There were 21 specimens that could be identified by rapid BAC pro. In this study, rapid BAC pro did not show superior results over MALDI Sepcityper Kit.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"73-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35420694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Urinary antigen test is frequently used as a routine laboratory test for early diagnosis of Legionella infection, which is especially suitable for ordinary Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, but not for other types of Legionella. We report a case of severe pneumonia caused by Legionella longbeachae, where a method of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay contributed an important role for the early detection. This case involved an 83-year-old man who developed fever, dyspnea, and productive cough. Since the medication of prescribed ceftriaxone had not been effective, he visited the emergency room of our hospital, where an X-ray revealed a severe pneumonia harboring a consolidation with air bronchogram in his right lower lung. His sputum and urine were subjected to the routine bacterial culture or the urinary antigen test for Legionella, which initially brought negative results. However, a positive result of LAMP assay enabled early diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia. Later, the bacterial cultures of sputum made some progress and 16S rRNA sequencing provided a proof of L. longbeachae. This LAMP assay may bring a benefit for the patients with Legionella pneumonia by enabling early detection of not only specific L. pneumophila serogroup 1, but also of the other Legionella species.
{"title":"[A Case of Severe <i>Legionella longbeachae</i> Pneumonia and Usefulness of LAMP Assay].","authors":"Kumiko Matsushita, Kohei Hijikuro, Shohei Arita, Yu Kaneko, Masahiro Isozaki","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urinary antigen test is frequently used as a routine laboratory test for early diagnosis of <i>Legionella infection</i>, which is especially suitable for ordinary <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> serogroup 1, but not for other types of <i>Legionella</i>. We report a case of severe pneumonia caused by <i>Legionella longbeachae</i>, where a method of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay contributed an important role for the early detection. This case involved an 83-year-old man who developed fever, dyspnea, and productive cough. Since the medication of prescribed ceftriaxone had not been effective, he visited the emergency room of our hospital, where an X-ray revealed a severe pneumonia harboring a consolidation with air bronchogram in his right lower lung. His sputum and urine were subjected to the routine bacterial culture or the urinary antigen test for <i>Legionella</i>, which initially brought negative results. However, a positive result of LAMP assay enabled early diagnosis of <i>Legionella pneumonia</i>. Later, the bacterial cultures of sputum made some progress and 16S rRNA sequencing provided a proof of <i>L. longbeachae</i>. This LAMP assay may bring a benefit for the patients with <i>Legionella pneumonia</i> by enabling early detection of not only specific <i>L. pneumophila</i> serogroup 1, but also of the other <i>Legionella</i> species.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35331751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We have evaluated a new immunochromatographic kit, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB", which had been developed for enhanced detection of influenza B viruses. Five strains of influenza A and B viruses were tested for reactivity and detection limits of the kit. Compared with the detection limits of commercially available kit of QuickNavi-Flu, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" showed a nearly equal reactivity to influenza A viruses, but quadruple reactivity to 2 influenza B viruses. Also, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" exhibited high specificity when tested in 130 influenza-negative culture specimens derived from 24 adult volunteers. Furthermore, "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" was clinically evaluated by using 866 specimens, including 190 nasal swabs, 201 nasal aspirations, 262 self-blown nasal discharges, and 213 pharyngeal swabs. Compared with the results of QuickNavi-Flu for influenza A, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 92.0%, 95.0%, and 94.8%, respectively. Whereas, as to influenza B, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 96.3%, 98.5%, 96.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. Similarly, compared with the results of influenza A viral culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 95.3%, 91.0%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding influenza B culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 97.5%, 95.1%, 91.5%, respectively. Overall, we concluded that the "KBM LineCheck Flu AB" is useful and suitable for diagnosis of influenza A and especially influenza B.
{"title":"[Evaluation of a new immunochromatographic kit for enhanced detection of influenza B virus].","authors":"Yasushi Ashikawa, Yoshio Takasaki, Shizuo Shindo, Yuji Yamashita, Keigo Shibao, Takashi Yokoyama, Takato Yokoyama, Minako Iwaya, Yumi Kiyomatsu, Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have evaluated a new immunochromatographic kit, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\", which had been developed for enhanced detection of influenza B viruses. Five strains of influenza A and B viruses were tested for reactivity and detection limits of the kit. Compared with the detection limits of commercially available kit of QuickNavi-Flu, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" showed a nearly equal reactivity to influenza A viruses, but quadruple reactivity to 2 influenza B viruses. Also, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" exhibited high specificity when tested in 130 influenza-negative culture specimens derived from 24 adult volunteers. Furthermore, \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" was clinically evaluated by using 866 specimens, including 190 nasal swabs, 201 nasal aspirations, 262 self-blown nasal discharges, and 213 pharyngeal swabs. Compared with the results of QuickNavi-Flu for influenza A, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 92.0%, 95.0%, and 94.8%, respectively. Whereas, as to influenza B, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 96.3%, 98.5%, 96.2%, and 93.4%, respectively. Similarly, compared with the results of influenza A viral culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs was calculated to be 95.3%, 91.0%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. Regarding influenza B culture, the test efficiency for the nasal swabs, the nasal aspirations, self-blown nasal discharges, and pharyngeal swabs were calculated to be 95.8%, 97.5%, 95.1%, 91.5%, respectively. Overall, we concluded that the \"KBM LineCheck Flu AB\" is useful and suitable for diagnosis of influenza A and especially influenza B.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34795135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The 2-step method is an algorithm to detect toxigenic Clostridium difficile. We herein compared the sensitivities and specificities of an enzyme immunoassay (toxin A/B-EIA), toxigenic culture (TC-EIA), Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification assay (LAMP), and Xpert C. difficile (Xpert) with the detection of the toxin B gene by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The results obtained showed that the sensitivities and specificities of toxin A/B-EIA, Xpert, TC-EIA, and LAMP were 30 and 100%, 87.2 and 100%, 97.5 and 89.7%, and 95 and 100%, respectively. We also evaluated the turnaround time (TAT) and cost of toxigenic C. difficile detection. Our hospital TAT for toxin A/B-EIA and TC-EIA are 37 min and 5 days, respectively. We estimated the TAT of Xpert, LAMP, and PCR to be 105 min, 5 days, and 6 days, respectively. On the other hand, the cost to detect toxigenic C. difficile increased in the order of TC-EIA, LAMP, Xpert, and PCR. We have never experienced outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in our hospital, and there is less the number of CDI than other place. So we selected TC-EIA that is good sensitivity and low cost per specimen. Hereafter it'll be necessary to solve a problem it takes time, because we have to respond to outbreak of CDI quickly if it happens.
{"title":"[Selection of Laboratory Procedures to Detect Toxigenic by the 2-Step Method].","authors":"Yoko Tanino, Mai Kodama, Hiroomi Daicho, Yoshito Miyauchi, Towa Yasumoto, Yukiji Yamada, Noriko Kyotani, Satoko Kurahashi, Masaji Ushiyama, Takeshi Kimura, Toshiaki Komori, Yumiko Fujitomo, Masaki Nakanishi, Naohisa Fujita","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2-step method is an algorithm to detect toxigenic <i>Clostridium difficile</i>. We herein compared the sensitivities and specificities of an enzyme immunoassay (toxin A/B-EIA), toxigenic culture (TC-EIA), Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification assay (LAMP), and Xpert <i>C. difficile</i> (Xpert) with the detection of the toxin B gene by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The results obtained showed that the sensitivities and specificities of toxin A/B-EIA, Xpert, TC-EIA, and LAMP were 30 and 100%, 87.2 and 100%, 97.5 and 89.7%, and 95 and 100%, respectively. We also evaluated the turnaround time (TAT) and cost of toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> detection. Our hospital TAT for toxin A/B-EIA and TC-EIA are 37 min and 5 days, respectively. We estimated the TAT of Xpert, LAMP, and PCR to be 105 min, 5 days, and 6 days, respectively. On the other hand, the cost to detect toxigenic <i>C. difficile</i> increased in the order of TC-EIA, LAMP, Xpert, and PCR. We have never experienced outbreak of <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection (CDI) in our hospital, and there is less the number of CDI than other place. So we selected TC-EIA that is good sensitivity and low cost per specimen. Hereafter it'll be necessary to solve a problem it takes time, because we have to respond to outbreak of CDI quickly if it happens.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34794696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Recently, many laboratories use fluorescence microscopy for rapid screening of clinical specimens for detection of Genus Mycobacterium. The success of the stain depends on the staining temperature at which the fluorescent dye could uniformly penetrate the cell wall through waxy lipid barrier of the mycobacterial organism. Therefore, this process requires a precise heating control. In this study, to control the temperature during fluorescent auramine- rhodamine staining, we explored the potential use of microwave. The efficiency of microwave irradiation during the staining process was evaluated by using a Mycobacterium avium-containing sputum of which the smear slide was irradiated with several different conditions in combination of time and wattage. As a result, 1) the liquid temperature of the stain correlated well with wattage of microwave irradiation. 2) The tubercle bacilli were easily visualized as brilliant fluorescent bacilli in an orange color when it was set at the best condition of 600 W and 10 sec irradiation. 3) The sensitivity of microscopy with this staining method (MW method) was higher than those of conventional staining methods such as Ziehl-Neelsen staining and standard auramine-rhodamine staining, demonstrating that MW method can be applicable to the sputum slides which contained a few bacilli. Thus, we established the new staining method that is rapid and easy to perform in clinical laboratories. Since the MW method has not yet been utilized in order to conduct fluorescence microscopy for sputum smears, advancement on this method will make a vast change in testing of acid fast bacilli.
{"title":"[Utility of the Rapid Staining with the Use of Microwave for Detection of Genus <i>Mycobacterium</i>].","authors":"Yumiko Funashima, Kyohei Kato, Taeko Narita, Hiroki Hanaiwa, Makoto Akiwa, Jun-Ichiro Sekiguchi, Zenzo Nagasawa, Kazuyuki Sugahara, Hiroshi Miyamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, many laboratories use fluorescence microscopy for rapid screening of clinical specimens for detection of Genus <i>Mycobacterium</i>. The success of the stain depends on the staining temperature at which the fluorescent dye could uniformly penetrate the cell wall through waxy lipid barrier of the mycobacterial organism. Therefore, this process requires a precise heating control. In this study, to control the temperature during fluorescent auramine- rhodamine staining, we explored the potential use of microwave. The efficiency of microwave irradiation during the staining process was evaluated by using a <i>Mycobacterium avium</i>-containing sputum of which the smear slide was irradiated with several different conditions in combination of time and wattage. As a result, 1) the liquid temperature of the stain correlated well with wattage of microwave irradiation. 2) The tubercle bacilli were easily visualized as brilliant fluorescent bacilli in an orange color when it was set at the best condition of 600 W and 10 sec irradiation. 3) The sensitivity of microscopy with this staining method (MW method) was higher than those of conventional staining methods such as Ziehl-Neelsen staining and standard auramine-rhodamine staining, demonstrating that MW method can be applicable to the sputum slides which contained a few bacilli. Thus, we established the new staining method that is rapid and easy to perform in clinical laboratories. Since the MW method has not yet been utilized in order to conduct fluorescence microscopy for sputum smears, advancement on this method will make a vast change in testing of acid fast bacilli.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34795137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The laboratory culture methods for isolating drug-resistant pathogens has been the gold standard in medical microbiology, and play pivotal roles in the overall management of infectious diseases. Recently, several reports have emphasized the development of antibiotics-resistance among anaerobic gram-negative rods, especially Genus Bacteroides and Prevotella. Therefore, a selective culture method to detect these pathogens is needed. We developed here the new selective culture medium, termed "KBM Anaero RS-GNR," for detecting anaerobic Gram-negative rods. Growth capability and selectivity of the agar medium were assessed by using the pure culture suspensions of more than 100 bacterial strains as well as the 13 samples experimentally contaminated with these bacterial strains. This new medium, "KBM Anaero RS-GNR," successfully showed the selective isolation of anaerobic Gram-negative rods. Compared with commercially available medium, "PV Brucella HK Agar, " which is also designed to detect anaerobic Gram-negative rods, there was no significant difference of the overall detection efficiency between two media. However, "KBM Anaero RS-GNR" showed superior to selectivity for anaerobic Gram-negative rods, especially from the samples contaminated with Candida species. Thus, the culture method using KBM Anaero RS-GNR is relevant for isolation of anaerobic Gram-negative rods especially from clinical specimens.
{"title":"[Development and Evaluation of a New Selective Culture Medium, KBM Anaero RS-GNR, for Detection of Anaerobic Gram Negative Rods].","authors":"Taeko Narita, Kyohei Kato, Hiroki Hanaiwa, Tetsuhiro Harada, Yumiko Funashima, Makoto Akiwa, Jun-Ichiro Sekiguchi, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The laboratory culture methods for isolating drug-resistant pathogens has been the gold standard in medical microbiology, and play pivotal roles in the overall management of infectious diseases. Recently, several reports have emphasized the development of antibiotics-resistance among anaerobic gram-negative rods, especially Genus <i>Bacteroides</i> and <i>Prevotella</i>. Therefore, a selective culture method to detect these pathogens is needed. We developed here the new selective culture medium, termed \"KBM Anaero RS-GNR,\" for detecting anaerobic Gram-negative rods. Growth capability and selectivity of the agar medium were assessed by using the pure culture suspensions of more than 100 bacterial strains as well as the 13 samples experimentally contaminated with these bacterial strains. This new medium, \"KBM Anaero RS-GNR,\" successfully showed the selective isolation of anaerobic Gram-negative rods. Compared with commercially available medium, \"PV Brucella HK Agar, \" which is also designed to detect anaerobic Gram-negative rods, there was no significant difference of the overall detection efficiency between two media. However, \"KBM Anaero RS-GNR\" showed superior to selectivity for anaerobic Gram-negative rods, especially from the samples contaminated with <i>Candida</i> species. Thus, the culture method using KBM Anaero RS-GNR is relevant for isolation of anaerobic Gram-negative rods especially from clinical specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34795134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"[Abstracts of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Clinical Toxicology. July 4, 2015. Kanazawa, Japan]].","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"Suppl 27th Sokai ","pages":"15-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34130368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}