首页 > 最新文献

Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology最新文献

英文 中文
A randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy 一项比较硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉在经皮肾镜取石术患者中的疗效和安全性的随机研究
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189568
Tanuj Kumawat, Varsha Kothari, S. Priyadarshi, Tuhin Mistry, S. Morwal
Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred surgical technique for large renal stones (>2 cm in diameter), which involves keyhole surgery through a 1 cm incision on the skin overlying the kidney. It can be performed under local, regional, as well as general anesthesia (GA). We have compared the efficacy and safety of regional epidural anesthesia (EA) and GA in patients undergoing PCNL. Patients and methods In this prospective study, a total of 112 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II undergoing PCNL were randomized into two groups. Patients in group A (n=56) received regional EA (with lignocaine and bupivacaine), and group B (n=56) patients received standard GA. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, amount of postoperative analgesic use, adverse effects, operative time, and blood loss were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results The mean VAS score at 1 h was 1.25 in group A and 5.21 in group B (P<0.001), at 3 h it was 3.05 in group A and 5.04 in group B (P<0.001), and at 6 h it was 3.04 in group A and 4.79 in group B (P<0.001). Less analgesia was required in the EA group compared with the GA group (P<0.001). Five (8.92%) patients in group A and 21 (37.50%) patients in group B had postoperative nausea (P<0.05). Pain score at 18 and 24 h, operative time, postoperative hemoglobin level, and adverse effects were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion EA is a good alternative anesthetic technique for PCNL with less analgesic consumption and fewer complications as compared to GA.
背景:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗大肾结石(直径> 2cm)的首选手术技术,它需要在肾上皮肤上开一个1cm的锁孔手术。它可以在局部、区域和全身麻醉(GA)下进行。我们比较了局部硬膜外麻醉(EA)和局部硬膜外麻醉(GA)在PCNL患者中的疗效和安全性。患者与方法在本前瞻性研究中,将112例美国麻醉医师学会物理状态I和II的PCNL患者随机分为两组。A组(n=56)患者接受局部EA(联合利多卡因和布比卡因),B组(n=56)患者接受标准GA。比较两组患者术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后镇痛药用量、不良反应、手术时间、出血量。结果A组患者1 h VAS平均评分为1.25,B组评分为5.21 (P<0.001); A组患者3 h VAS平均评分为3.05,B组评分为5.04 (P<0.001); A组患者6 h VAS平均评分为3.04,B组评分为4.79 (P<0.001)。与GA组相比,EA组需要较少的镇痛(P<0.001)。A组术后恶心发生率为5例(8.92%),B组为21例(37.50%)(P<0.05)。两组患者18、24 h疼痛评分、手术时间、术后血红蛋白水平、不良反应等差异无统计学意义。结论与GA相比,EA是一种较好的PCNL替代麻醉技术,镇痛消耗少,并发症少。
{"title":"A randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy","authors":"Tanuj Kumawat, Varsha Kothari, S. Priyadarshi, Tuhin Mistry, S. Morwal","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189568","url":null,"abstract":"Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred surgical technique for large renal stones (>2 cm in diameter), which involves keyhole surgery through a 1 cm incision on the skin overlying the kidney. It can be performed under local, regional, as well as general anesthesia (GA). We have compared the efficacy and safety of regional epidural anesthesia (EA) and GA in patients undergoing PCNL. Patients and methods In this prospective study, a total of 112 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II undergoing PCNL were randomized into two groups. Patients in group A (n=56) received regional EA (with lignocaine and bupivacaine), and group B (n=56) patients received standard GA. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, amount of postoperative analgesic use, adverse effects, operative time, and blood loss were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results The mean VAS score at 1 h was 1.25 in group A and 5.21 in group B (P<0.001), at 3 h it was 3.05 in group A and 5.04 in group B (P<0.001), and at 6 h it was 3.04 in group A and 4.79 in group B (P<0.001). Less analgesia was required in the EA group compared with the GA group (P<0.001). Five (8.92%) patients in group A and 21 (37.50%) patients in group B had postoperative nausea (P<0.05). Pain score at 18 and 24 h, operative time, postoperative hemoglobin level, and adverse effects were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion EA is a good alternative anesthetic technique for PCNL with less analgesic consumption and fewer complications as compared to GA.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82933977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Comparative study evaluating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plain block versus intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetics in pain control following laparoscopic colectomy 超声引导下经腹平阻滞与腹腔注射局麻药对腹腔镜结肠切除术后疼痛控制效果的比较研究
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189096
A. Shoukry, W. Nofal, S. Elfawal
Background Laparoscopic surgeries are being widely conducted nowadays for its well-known advantages such as less postoperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay, decreased morbidity and mortality, and reduced healthcare costs. Many analgesic modalities have been applied for this type of surgery, of which we have chosen the intraperitoneal injection (IP) of local anesthetics and the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. We studied the effect of both techniques on postoperative pain scores and their effect on abdominal and shoulder pain after laparoscopic colectomy. Patients and methods Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. All of them were of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I or II and scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into one of two groups (25 patients each): the TAP block group (TAP group) and the IP of local anesthetics group (IP group). Pain score using the numerical rating scale (NRS), hemodynamic parameters, amount of consumption of rescue analgesia, shoulder pain, and adverse reactions were recorded. Results The main outcome variable was the pain score in the immediate postoperative period and the next 3 h; the mean NRS scores were lower in the TAP group than in the IP group in the previously mentioned time periods, with a highly significant difference. Also, there was a significant difference in the NRS score at the fourth hour postoperatively; however, the subsequent NRS scores at the different time intervals showed no significant difference until the end of the 24th hour postoperatively. In the TAP group, 20 patients (80%) complained of abdominal pain at least once in the first 24 h after surgery, whereas all the patients in the IP group experienced abdominal pain, with a significant difference between the two groups. The overall analgesic consumption in milligrams and the total number of analgesic doses were found to be less in the TAP group, with a highly significant difference. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated that the TAP block is a more effective analgesic modality for abdominal pain than the IP local anesthetic during the early postoperative period after laparoscopic colectomy but IP is more effective in relieving postoperative shoulder pain.
背景腹腔镜手术因其术后疼痛小、住院时间短、发病率和死亡率低、医疗费用低等众所周知的优点而被广泛应用。许多镇痛方式已经应用于这类手术,其中我们选择了局麻药腹腔注射(IP)和腹横面阻滞(TAP)。我们研究了两种技术对术后疼痛评分的影响,以及它们对腹腔镜结肠切除术后腹部和肩部疼痛的影响。患者和方法共纳入50例患者。所有患者均为美国麻醉学会(ASA)身体状态I或II级,计划择期腹腔镜结肠切除术。患者随机分为两组(每组25例):TAP阻滞组(TAP组)和局麻药IP组(IP组)。采用数值评定量表(NRS)记录疼痛评分、血流动力学参数、抢救镇痛耗用量、肩部疼痛及不良反应。结果主要观察指标为术后即刻及术后3 h疼痛评分;在上述时间段内,TAP组的平均NRS评分低于IP组,差异极显著。两组术后第4小时NRS评分差异有统计学意义;然而,不同时间间隔的NRS评分直到术后24小时结束时均无显著差异。在TAP组中,20例(80%)患者在术后24小时内腹痛至少一次,而IP组中所有患者均出现腹痛,两组间差异有统计学意义。TAP组镇痛药总消耗量(毫克)和镇痛药总剂量数均较对照组少,且差异极显著。结论本研究结果表明,在腹腔镜结肠切除术后早期,TAP阻滞是一种比IP局部麻醉更有效的腹痛镇痛方式,但IP对缓解术后肩部疼痛更有效。
{"title":"Comparative study evaluating the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plain block versus intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetics in pain control following laparoscopic colectomy","authors":"A. Shoukry, W. Nofal, S. Elfawal","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189096","url":null,"abstract":"Background Laparoscopic surgeries are being widely conducted nowadays for its well-known advantages such as less postoperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay, decreased morbidity and mortality, and reduced healthcare costs. Many analgesic modalities have been applied for this type of surgery, of which we have chosen the intraperitoneal injection (IP) of local anesthetics and the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. We studied the effect of both techniques on postoperative pain scores and their effect on abdominal and shoulder pain after laparoscopic colectomy. Patients and methods Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. All of them were of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I or II and scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into one of two groups (25 patients each): the TAP block group (TAP group) and the IP of local anesthetics group (IP group). Pain score using the numerical rating scale (NRS), hemodynamic parameters, amount of consumption of rescue analgesia, shoulder pain, and adverse reactions were recorded. Results The main outcome variable was the pain score in the immediate postoperative period and the next 3 h; the mean NRS scores were lower in the TAP group than in the IP group in the previously mentioned time periods, with a highly significant difference. Also, there was a significant difference in the NRS score at the fourth hour postoperatively; however, the subsequent NRS scores at the different time intervals showed no significant difference until the end of the 24th hour postoperatively. In the TAP group, 20 patients (80%) complained of abdominal pain at least once in the first 24 h after surgery, whereas all the patients in the IP group experienced abdominal pain, with a significant difference between the two groups. The overall analgesic consumption in milligrams and the total number of analgesic doses were found to be less in the TAP group, with a highly significant difference. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated that the TAP block is a more effective analgesic modality for abdominal pain than the IP local anesthetic during the early postoperative period after laparoscopic colectomy but IP is more effective in relieving postoperative shoulder pain.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82183351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Management of perioperative bleeding associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors 选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂围手术期出血的处理
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189567
Lobna A Saleh, A. Hassan, A. Sobhy
Increased bleeding tendency is associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In this study, we report a case of perioperative bleeding in patient on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The management options for such cases are discussed.
出血倾向增加与选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂的使用有关。在这项研究中,我们报告了一例患者围手术期出血选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂。讨论了这种情况下的管理选择。
{"title":"Management of perioperative bleeding associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors","authors":"Lobna A Saleh, A. Hassan, A. Sobhy","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189567","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189567","url":null,"abstract":"Increased bleeding tendency is associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In this study, we report a case of perioperative bleeding in patient on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The management options for such cases are discussed.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79656282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of high fractional inspiratory oxygen on postoperative pulmonary function: a randomized–controlled study 高分数吸氧对术后肺功能的影响:一项随机对照研究
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189090
G. Gad
Background Although a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) could reduce surgical site infection, there is a concern that it could increase postoperative pulmonary complications, including hypoxemia. However, there is an advantage for preoperative high FiO2 before induction of anesthesia as it decreases the incidences of desaturation and wound infection. Our aim was to assess whether different levels of FiO2 affect pulmonary function tests. Patients and methods Ninety patients scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to receive either preoxygenation with 1.0 FiO2 for 3 min, then continued on 1.0 FiO2 till the end of surgery (group A), or preoxygenation with 1.0 FiO2 for 3 min, then continued on 0.4 FiO2 till the end of surgery (group B), or preoxygenation with 0.4 FiO2 then continued on 0.4 FiO2 till the end of surgery (group C). The oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was measured every 30 min during anesthesia and 2 h after extubation. Pulmonary function test was measured on the morning of surgery and 2 h after extubation. Results Five minutes after intubation, the median PaO2/FiO2 was 483 (371–490) mmHg in group A, 420 (336–490) mmHg in group B, and 450 (350–485) mmHg in group C (P = 0.24). Two hours after extubation, the PaO2/FiO2 was reduced to 333 (314–342) mmHg in group A, 328 (311–357) mmHg in group B, and 342 (303–316) mmHg in group C (P = 0.55). The median functional vital capacity were 1950 (1600–2120), 1850 (1570–2250), and 1900 (1490–2020) ml at baseline and 1650 (1370–1953), 1670 (1340–2350), and 1711 (1412–2410) ml 2 h after extubation in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P = 0.66). Conclusion We found no significant difference in the oxygenation index or pulmonary function tests between patients administered different levels of FiO2.
背景:虽然高吸氧率(FiO2)可以减少手术部位感染,但也有可能增加术后肺部并发症,包括低氧血症。然而,麻醉诱导前术前高FiO2有一个优势,因为它减少了去饱和和伤口感染的发生率。我们的目的是评估不同水平的FiO2是否影响肺功能测试。患者与方法90例择期腹式子宫切除术患者随机分为两组,一组接受1.0 FiO2预充氧3分钟,然后继续1.0 FiO2至手术结束(A组),另一组接受1.0 FiO2预充氧3分钟,然后继续0.4 FiO2至手术结束(B组)。或以0.4 FiO2预充氧,然后继续以0.4 FiO2预充氧至手术结束(C组)。麻醉期间和拔管后2 h每30 min测定一次氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)。于手术当日上午及拔管后2 h进行肺功能检查。结果插管后5min, A组PaO2/FiO2中位数为483 (371 ~ 490)mmHg, B组为420 (336 ~ 490)mmHg, C组为450 (350 ~ 485)mmHg (P = 0.24)。拔管2 h后,A组PaO2/FiO2降至333 (314-342)mmHg, B组降至328 (311-357)mmHg, C组降至342 (303-316)mmHg (P = 0.55)。基线时的中位功能肺活量分别为1950(1600-2120)、1850(1570-2250)和1900 (1490-2020)ml,拔管后2 h, A、B、C组分别为1650(1370-1953)、1670(1340-2350)和1711 (1412-2410)ml (P = 0.66)。结论不同FiO2浓度患者的氧合指数和肺功能指标无明显差异。
{"title":"Effect of high fractional inspiratory oxygen on postoperative pulmonary function: a randomized–controlled study","authors":"G. Gad","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189090","url":null,"abstract":"Background Although a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) could reduce surgical site infection, there is a concern that it could increase postoperative pulmonary complications, including hypoxemia. However, there is an advantage for preoperative high FiO2 before induction of anesthesia as it decreases the incidences of desaturation and wound infection. Our aim was to assess whether different levels of FiO2 affect pulmonary function tests. Patients and methods Ninety patients scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to receive either preoxygenation with 1.0 FiO2 for 3 min, then continued on 1.0 FiO2 till the end of surgery (group A), or preoxygenation with 1.0 FiO2 for 3 min, then continued on 0.4 FiO2 till the end of surgery (group B), or preoxygenation with 0.4 FiO2 then continued on 0.4 FiO2 till the end of surgery (group C). The oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) was measured every 30 min during anesthesia and 2 h after extubation. Pulmonary function test was measured on the morning of surgery and 2 h after extubation. Results Five minutes after intubation, the median PaO2/FiO2 was 483 (371–490) mmHg in group A, 420 (336–490) mmHg in group B, and 450 (350–485) mmHg in group C (P = 0.24). Two hours after extubation, the PaO2/FiO2 was reduced to 333 (314–342) mmHg in group A, 328 (311–357) mmHg in group B, and 342 (303–316) mmHg in group C (P = 0.55). The median functional vital capacity were 1950 (1600–2120), 1850 (1570–2250), and 1900 (1490–2020) ml at baseline and 1650 (1370–1953), 1670 (1340–2350), and 1711 (1412–2410) ml 2 h after extubation in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P = 0.66). Conclusion We found no significant difference in the oxygenation index or pulmonary function tests between patients administered different levels of FiO2.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89373206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prophylactic dexamethasone or pethidine for the prevention of postoperative shivering during transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia 预防性地塞米松或哌替啶预防脊髓麻醉下经尿道前列腺切除术术后寒战
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189102
Abd-Elazeem El Bakry, E. Ibrahim
Background Shivering is a common complication in elderly patients undergoing urologic operations under spinal anesthesia. The present study compares the effect of prophylactic dexamethasone and pethidine on shivering during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under spinal anesthesia. Patients and methods This random prospective double-blinded controlled study was conducted on 90 patients scheduled for TURP operations under spinal anesthesia. Patients were allocated into three groups: in the C group, patients were administered intravenous 10 ml normal saline before spinal anesthesia. In the P group, patients were administered 25 mg pethidine in 10 ml normal saline. In the D group, patients were administered 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone in 10 ml normal saline. Core body temperature, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, incidence and severity of shivering, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were recorded. Results The incidence and severity of shivering were low in the pethidine and dexamethasone groups compared with the control group (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the pethidine and dexamethasone groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Prophylactic dexamethasone is as effective as pethidine in reducing the incidence and severity of shivering in TURP patients under spinal anesthesia.
背景:寒战是脊柱麻醉下老年泌尿外科手术患者的常见并发症。本研究比较了脊髓麻醉下预防性地塞米松和哌替啶对经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)中寒战的影响。患者与方法本随机前瞻性双盲对照研究对90例脊柱麻醉下行TURP手术的患者进行研究。将患者分为三组:C组患者在脊髓麻醉前静脉注射生理盐水10 ml。P组给予哌替啶25 mg,加入生理盐水10 ml。D组患者给予0.1 mg/kg地塞米松,加入生理盐水10 ml。记录核心体温、平均动脉血压、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、寒战、恶心、呕吐和瘙痒的发生率和严重程度。结果哌替啶组和地塞米松组寒战发生率和严重程度均低于对照组(P < 0.05),哌替啶组和地塞米松组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论预防性地塞米松与哌啶可有效降低脊柱麻醉下TURP患者寒战的发生率和严重程度。
{"title":"Prophylactic dexamethasone or pethidine for the prevention of postoperative shivering during transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia","authors":"Abd-Elazeem El Bakry, E. Ibrahim","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189102","url":null,"abstract":"Background Shivering is a common complication in elderly patients undergoing urologic operations under spinal anesthesia. The present study compares the effect of prophylactic dexamethasone and pethidine on shivering during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under spinal anesthesia. Patients and methods This random prospective double-blinded controlled study was conducted on 90 patients scheduled for TURP operations under spinal anesthesia. Patients were allocated into three groups: in the C group, patients were administered intravenous 10 ml normal saline before spinal anesthesia. In the P group, patients were administered 25 mg pethidine in 10 ml normal saline. In the D group, patients were administered 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone in 10 ml normal saline. Core body temperature, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, incidence and severity of shivering, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were recorded. Results The incidence and severity of shivering were low in the pethidine and dexamethasone groups compared with the control group (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the pethidine and dexamethasone groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Prophylactic dexamethasone is as effective as pethidine in reducing the incidence and severity of shivering in TURP patients under spinal anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91344482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Copper and anesthesia − a surprising connection 铜和麻醉——一种令人惊讶的联系
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189569
P. Bhalerao, K. Kelkar, Anandlkumar Pande, Bapu P.G. Kakade
A 28-year-old female presented with complaints of fever with chills and dizziness on and off for the last 3 months. On admission, she was investigated and found to have anemia and thrombocytopenia. On examination, the patient was pale and had a palpable huge spleen. Past history revealed a diagnosis of Wilson’s disease 15 years ago. This disease, due to altered copper metabolism, may influence the conduct and outcome of anesthesia secondary to abnormalities in hemopoietic, cardiovascular, connective tissue, immune, and nervous systems. In this study, we present a patient, a diagnosed case of Wilson’s disease, with massive splenomegaly posted for splenectomy under general anesthesia and the concerns involved therein.
28岁女性,过去3个月出现发热、发冷和断断续续头晕的主诉。入院时,检查发现有贫血和血小板减少症。检查时,患者面色苍白,可触及巨大的脾脏。过去的病史显示15年前诊断出威尔逊氏病。由于铜代谢的改变,这种疾病可能继发于造血、心血管、结缔组织、免疫和神经系统的异常,从而影响麻醉的传导和结果。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个确诊为威尔逊氏病的病人,在全身麻醉下进行了脾切除术,并讨论了其中涉及的问题。
{"title":"Copper and anesthesia − a surprising connection","authors":"P. Bhalerao, K. Kelkar, Anandlkumar Pande, Bapu P.G. Kakade","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189569","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189569","url":null,"abstract":"A 28-year-old female presented with complaints of fever with chills and dizziness on and off for the last 3 months. On admission, she was investigated and found to have anemia and thrombocytopenia. On examination, the patient was pale and had a palpable huge spleen. Past history revealed a diagnosis of Wilson’s disease 15 years ago. This disease, due to altered copper metabolism, may influence the conduct and outcome of anesthesia secondary to abnormalities in hemopoietic, cardiovascular, connective tissue, immune, and nervous systems. In this study, we present a patient, a diagnosed case of Wilson’s disease, with massive splenomegaly posted for splenectomy under general anesthesia and the concerns involved therein.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79028167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Innovative use of damaged fiberoptic bronchoscope 创新使用受损纤维支气管镜
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189094
S. Kaliannan, K. Sherfudeen, P. Dammalapati
Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope is a delicate instrument that can get damaged due to improper handling. Once damaged, this costly instrument becomes useless. We reported a case in which we used a damaged flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope in overcoming a difficulty in advancing the endotracheal tube after visualization of the vocal cord with TruviewPCD in a patient with cervical spine injury.
柔性纤维支气管镜是一种精密的仪器,使用不当容易损坏。这种昂贵的仪器一旦损坏就变得无用了。我们报告了一个病例,我们使用受损的柔性纤维支气管镜克服了TruviewPCD显示声带后气管内管推进困难的颈椎损伤患者。
{"title":"Innovative use of damaged fiberoptic bronchoscope","authors":"S. Kaliannan, K. Sherfudeen, P. Dammalapati","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189094","url":null,"abstract":"Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope is a delicate instrument that can get damaged due to improper handling. Once damaged, this costly instrument becomes useless. We reported a case in which we used a damaged flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope in overcoming a difficulty in advancing the endotracheal tube after visualization of the vocal cord with TruviewPCD in a patient with cervical spine injury.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87239518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparative study between terlipressin alone and dobutamine and terlipressin in septic shock patients 特利加压素与多巴酚丁胺加特利加压素治疗感染性休克的比较研究
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189565
Waleed Abdalla, F. Kamel, N. Ali, T. Shabana
Background The use of terlipressin, a long-acting synthetic analog of vasopressin, is associated with reduction in cardiac output and oxygen delivery. The present study was designed to determine whether dobutamine may reverse the terlipressin-induced depression in central venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) in patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock. Patients and methods This clinical trial was conducted in Ain Shams University hospital’s surgical ICU. In total, 90 septic shock patients requiring a continuous infusion of norepinephrine reaching 0.6 µg/kg/min to maintain mean arterial pressure at greater than or equal to 65 mmHg were randomly allocated to three groups be treated as follows: (i): group I, treated with norepinephrine infusion (control); (ii) group II, treated with a single bolus of terlipressin 1 mg, intravenous; (iii) and group III, treated with a single bolus of terlipressin 1 mg, followed by a dobutamine infusion. Results The use of terlipressin (with and without dobutamine) resulted in maintaining mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg with reduction in norepinephrine requirements to 0.2 (0.1) µg/kg/min in group II and 0.15 (0.1) µg/kg/min in group III (P in each <0.001 vs. control at 2, 4, and 6 h). The use of terlipressin alone in group II resulted in a drop in central SvO2 to 58 (3)% (P<0.001 vs. control at 2, 4, and 6 h) and a decrease in heart rate to 105 beat/minute (7) (P vs. control=0.013 at 2 h, 0.001 at 4 h, and 0.01 at 6 h). The addition of dobutamine in group III resulted in an increase in central SvO2 to 70 (3)% (P<0.001 vs. group II at 2, 4, and 6 h). Conclusion Administration of terlipressin bolus was effective in increasing mean arterial blood pressure and reducing norepinephrine requirements in catecholamine-dependant septic shock patients. Its use was associated with significant reductions in central SvO2, which was reversed by using dobutamine.
特利加压素是一种长效抗利尿激素的合成类似物,其使用与心输出量和氧输送减少有关。本研究旨在确定多巴酚丁胺是否可以逆转特利加压素引起的儿茶酚胺依赖性感染性休克患者中心静脉氧饱和度(SvO2)下降。患者和方法本临床试验在艾因沙姆斯大学医院外科ICU进行。共有90例脓毒性休克患者需要持续输注去甲肾上腺素(0.6µg/kg/min)以维持平均动脉压大于或等于65 mmHg,随机分为三组,治疗方法如下:(i):第一组,输注去甲肾上腺素(对照组);(ii) ii组,特利加压素1 mg单丸,静脉注射;(iii)和iii组,给予特利加压素1 mg单丸,随后输注多巴酚丁胺。结果使用特利加压素(含和不含多巴酚丁胺)使平均动脉压维持在65 mmHg以上,II组降至0.2(0.1)µg/kg/min, III组降至0.15(0.1)µg/kg/min(与对照组相比,2、4和6 h的P均<0.001)。II组单独使用特利加压素导致中央SvO2下降至58(3)%(与对照组相比,2、4和6 h时P<0.001),心率下降至105次/分钟(7)(与对照组相比,2 h时P =0.013, 4 h时P = 0.001, 6 h时P =0.01)。在III组中添加多巴酚丁胺导致中央SvO2增加到70(3)%(与II组相比,在2,4和6 h时P<0.001)。结论特利加压素丸能有效提高儿茶酚胺依赖的脓毒性休克患者的平均动脉血压,降低去甲肾上腺素的需要量。它的使用与中央SvO2的显著降低有关,而多巴酚丁胺则逆转了这一趋势。
{"title":"A comparative study between terlipressin alone and dobutamine and terlipressin in septic shock patients","authors":"Waleed Abdalla, F. Kamel, N. Ali, T. Shabana","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189565","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189565","url":null,"abstract":"Background The use of terlipressin, a long-acting synthetic analog of vasopressin, is associated with reduction in cardiac output and oxygen delivery. The present study was designed to determine whether dobutamine may reverse the terlipressin-induced depression in central venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) in patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock. Patients and methods This clinical trial was conducted in Ain Shams University hospital’s surgical ICU. In total, 90 septic shock patients requiring a continuous infusion of norepinephrine reaching 0.6 µg/kg/min to maintain mean arterial pressure at greater than or equal to 65 mmHg were randomly allocated to three groups be treated as follows: (i): group I, treated with norepinephrine infusion (control); (ii) group II, treated with a single bolus of terlipressin 1 mg, intravenous; (iii) and group III, treated with a single bolus of terlipressin 1 mg, followed by a dobutamine infusion. Results The use of terlipressin (with and without dobutamine) resulted in maintaining mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg with reduction in norepinephrine requirements to 0.2 (0.1) µg/kg/min in group II and 0.15 (0.1) µg/kg/min in group III (P in each <0.001 vs. control at 2, 4, and 6 h). The use of terlipressin alone in group II resulted in a drop in central SvO2 to 58 (3)% (P<0.001 vs. control at 2, 4, and 6 h) and a decrease in heart rate to 105 beat/minute (7) (P vs. control=0.013 at 2 h, 0.001 at 4 h, and 0.01 at 6 h). The addition of dobutamine in group III resulted in an increase in central SvO2 to 70 (3)% (P<0.001 vs. group II at 2, 4, and 6 h). Conclusion Administration of terlipressin bolus was effective in increasing mean arterial blood pressure and reducing norepinephrine requirements in catecholamine-dependant septic shock patients. Its use was associated with significant reductions in central SvO2, which was reversed by using dobutamine.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77585890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Comparative study of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl as adjuvants to ropivacaine for lower-limb surgery 鞘内咪达唑仑与芬太尼作为罗哌卡因辅助剂用于下肢手术的比较研究
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189101
S. Elfawal, A. Shoukry, Walid H. Nofal
Background The current prospective randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl when added to hyperbaric ropivacaine, evaluating the effect of each on the duration and quality of spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric ropivacaine. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 90 patients of both sexes, aged 20-60 years, of class I or II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, who were undergoing elective lower-limb surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups (30 patients each): group R (control group) received 3 ml (15 mg) of hyperbaric ropivacaine plus 0.5 ml of normal saline (0.9%) at a total volume of 3.5 ml intrathecally, whereas group RF received 3 ml (15 mg) of hyperbaric ropivacaine plus 0.5 ml of 25 μg fentanyl (50 μg/ml) at a total volume of 3.5 ml intrathecally and group RM received 3 ml (15 mg) of hyperbaric ropivacaine plus 0.5 ml of 1 mg midazolam (2 mg/ml) at a total volume of 3.5 ml intrathecally. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, postoperative pain, and the time to first rescue analgesia request were noted. Patients were observed for hypotension, bradycardia, sedation, respiratory depression, pruritus, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results The onset times and the duration of motor blockade were comparable among groups, whereas the time to sensory block regression was longer in group RM and group RF as compared with group R (P < 0.001). The duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in group RM and group RF as compared with group R (P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference between group RM and group RF. The incidence of pruritus and vomiting was higher in group RF. Conclusion Adding midazolam to hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for lower-limb surgeries is considered a good alternative for improving the duration of sensory block and decreasing the analgesic requirement in the early postoperative period with minimal side effects compared with hyperbaric ropivacaine alone or fentanyl combined with hyperbaric ropivacaine.
本前瞻性随机双盲研究旨在比较咪达唑仑和芬太尼加入高压罗哌卡因后鞘内注射的临床疗效,评估两者对高压罗哌卡因产生的脊髓阻滞的持续时间和质量的影响。患者与方法本研究纳入90例择期下肢手术患者,男女均有,年龄20-60岁,美国麻醉医师学会分级I级或II级。患者随机分为三组(每组30例):R组(对照组)收到了3毫升(15毫克)的高压ropivacaine + 0.5毫升的生理盐水(0.9%)总量为3.5毫升鞘内,而射频组收到3毫升(15毫克)的高压ropivacaine + 0.5毫升的25μg芬太尼(50μg / ml)总量为3.5毫升鞘内和组RM收到3毫升(15毫克)的高压ropivacaine + 0.5毫升的1毫克咪达唑仑(2毫克/毫升)总量为3.5毫升鞘内。记录感觉和运动阻滞的发生和持续时间,术后疼痛,以及第一次抢救止痛要求的时间。观察患者有无低血压、心动过缓、镇静、呼吸抑制、瘙痒、术后恶心呕吐。结果两组间运动阻滞发作次数和持续时间具有可比性,RM组和RF组感觉阻滞回归时间较R组长(P < 0.001)。RM组和RF组术后镇痛持续时间明显长于R组(P < 0.001),而RM组和RF组之间无差异。RF组瘙痒、呕吐发生率较高。结论与单纯高压氧罗哌卡因或芬太尼联用高压氧罗哌卡因相比,在高压氧罗哌卡因中加入咪达唑仑可改善术后早期感觉阻滞时间,减少术后早期镇痛需求,且副作用小。
{"title":"Comparative study of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl as adjuvants to ropivacaine for lower-limb surgery","authors":"S. Elfawal, A. Shoukry, Walid H. Nofal","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189101","url":null,"abstract":"Background The current prospective randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of intrathecal midazolam versus fentanyl when added to hyperbaric ropivacaine, evaluating the effect of each on the duration and quality of spinal blockade produced by hyperbaric ropivacaine. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 90 patients of both sexes, aged 20-60 years, of class I or II of the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, who were undergoing elective lower-limb surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups (30 patients each): group R (control group) received 3 ml (15 mg) of hyperbaric ropivacaine plus 0.5 ml of normal saline (0.9%) at a total volume of 3.5 ml intrathecally, whereas group RF received 3 ml (15 mg) of hyperbaric ropivacaine plus 0.5 ml of 25 μg fentanyl (50 μg/ml) at a total volume of 3.5 ml intrathecally and group RM received 3 ml (15 mg) of hyperbaric ropivacaine plus 0.5 ml of 1 mg midazolam (2 mg/ml) at a total volume of 3.5 ml intrathecally. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, postoperative pain, and the time to first rescue analgesia request were noted. Patients were observed for hypotension, bradycardia, sedation, respiratory depression, pruritus, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results The onset times and the duration of motor blockade were comparable among groups, whereas the time to sensory block regression was longer in group RM and group RF as compared with group R (P < 0.001). The duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in group RM and group RF as compared with group R (P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference between group RM and group RF. The incidence of pruritus and vomiting was higher in group RF. Conclusion Adding midazolam to hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for lower-limb surgeries is considered a good alternative for improving the duration of sensory block and decreasing the analgesic requirement in the early postoperative period with minimal side effects compared with hyperbaric ropivacaine alone or fentanyl combined with hyperbaric ropivacaine.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73030159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Global burden of diabetes: action for anesthesia 全球糖尿病负担:麻醉行动
Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.189088
S. Bajwa, S. Kalra, M. Baruah
Introduction The Lancet recently reported on the Global Burden of Disease 2010 (GBD) in a series of landmark epidemiological articles that discuss the causes of morbidity and mortality in people of both sexes, of all age groups, based on data from 187 countries. This seminal treatise has major significance for anesthesia, as it gives us a bird’s eye view of the comorbid conditions one can expect in critical care and anesthesia practice. The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has significant impact on anesthesiology practice as it can directly and indirectly impact the outcome in surgical patients. A strong need is felt among endocrinologists and anesthesiologists to work in unison so as to manage the increasing number of surgical patients with DM. A universal consensus on therapeutic management strategies in surgical diabetic patients is mandatory between these two specialties to counter this ever‐increasing burden of DM. As such, a strong need is felt to highlight the impact of the DM epidemic in the practice of diabeto‐anesthesia [1]. This communication highlights the global burden of diabetes, as reported by GBD 2010, while emphasizing the surgical and medical aspects of the disease that may impact anesthesia care in times to come [2–4]. (http://www. healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/visualizations/ gbd‐2010‐leading‐causes‐and‐risks‐region‐heat‐map? metric = YLL).
《柳叶刀》最近在一系列具有里程碑意义的流行病学文章中报道了2010年全球疾病负担(GBD),根据187个国家的数据,讨论了所有年龄组男女发病和死亡的原因。这篇开创性的论文对麻醉有重大意义,因为它给了我们一个鸟瞰图的合并症的条件,可以预期在重症监护和麻醉实践。糖尿病(DM)患病率的增加对麻醉实践产生了重大影响,因为它可以直接或间接地影响手术患者的预后。内分泌科医生和麻醉科医生强烈需要齐心协力,以管理越来越多的手术糖尿病患者。这两个专业之间必须就手术糖尿病患者的治疗管理策略达成普遍共识,以应对日益增加的糖尿病负担。因此,我们强烈需要强调糖尿病流行在糖尿病麻醉实践中的影响[1]。正如GBD 2010报道的那样,这篇文章强调了糖尿病的全球负担,同时强调了该疾病的外科和医学方面可能会影响未来的麻醉护理[2-4]。(http://www。healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/visualizations/ gbd量2010的领先的地理原因和应承担的风险还是地理地理区域热量地图吗?metric = YLL)。
{"title":"Global burden of diabetes: action for anesthesia","authors":"S. Bajwa, S. Kalra, M. Baruah","doi":"10.4103/1687-7934.189088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1687-7934.189088","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The Lancet recently reported on the Global Burden of Disease 2010 (GBD) in a series of landmark epidemiological articles that discuss the causes of morbidity and mortality in people of both sexes, of all age groups, based on data from 187 countries. This seminal treatise has major significance for anesthesia, as it gives us a bird’s eye view of the comorbid conditions one can expect in critical care and anesthesia practice. The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has significant impact on anesthesiology practice as it can directly and indirectly impact the outcome in surgical patients. A strong need is felt among endocrinologists and anesthesiologists to work in unison so as to manage the increasing number of surgical patients with DM. A universal consensus on therapeutic management strategies in surgical diabetic patients is mandatory between these two specialties to counter this ever‐increasing burden of DM. As such, a strong need is felt to highlight the impact of the DM epidemic in the practice of diabeto‐anesthesia [1]. This communication highlights the global burden of diabetes, as reported by GBD 2010, while emphasizing the surgical and medical aspects of the disease that may impact anesthesia care in times to come [2–4]. (http://www. healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/visualizations/ gbd‐2010‐leading‐causes‐and‐risks‐region‐heat‐map? metric = YLL).","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83841951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1