{"title":"Compulsory admission to hospital.","authors":"N J O'Connell","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 327","pages":"434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712132/pdf/jroyalcgprac00010-0039b.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13703109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Essex faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners organized a collaborative study for trainees in Essex between October 1986 and July 1988. Of the trainees in post during the study period, 28 (46%) participated. The study was performed not only as an educational exercise for trainees in their practice year but also to assess the feasibility of collaborative study as a research tool in general practice. The authors feel that facilitating collaborative research is a faculty activity worthy of consideration.
{"title":"Facilitating a trainee collaborative study.","authors":"D J Timmins, S H McFarlane, N S Butler","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Essex faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners organized a collaborative study for trainees in Essex between October 1986 and July 1988. Of the trainees in post during the study period, 28 (46%) participated. The study was performed not only as an educational exercise for trainees in their practice year but also to assess the feasibility of collaborative study as a research tool in general practice. The authors feel that facilitating collaborative research is a faculty activity worthy of consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 327","pages":"423-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712129/pdf/jroyalcgprac00010-0028.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13703098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Compulsory audit projects for medical students.","authors":"R G Neville, J D Knox","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 327","pages":"430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712112/pdf/jroyalcgprac00010-0035a.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13703100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Inner cities: primary health care in the market place.","authors":"M Bedford","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 327","pages":"398-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712107/pdf/jroyalcgprac00010-0003.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13703263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Two commonly held beliefs about referral rates were investigated in this study: first that demand for services is determined by supply and secondly that there is wide variation between general practices in their referral rates. All referrals to specialist outpatient clinics were recorded during two 11-week periods by general practitioners in eight practices in the new town of Milton Keynes and in 17 practices elsewhere in the Oxford region. During the first period, only a limited outpatient service was available in the new town; for many specialist services, people had to be referred to hospitals outside the district. Referral rates from Milton Keynes were very similar to those from the rest of the region. By the second period the range of specialist facilities available locally had expanded considerably with the opening of the new district general hospital and during this period there was a statistically significant but rather small increase in referral rates from Milton Keynes. Variation in referral rates between general practices within each geographical group was greater than that between the two groups. Overall, there was about a three-fold variation between general practices in outpatient referral rates which is considerably less than that commonly thought to exist.
{"title":"Do referral rates vary widely between practices and does supply of services affect demand? A study in Milton Keynes and the Oxford region.","authors":"A Noone, M Goldacre, A Coulter, V Seagroatt","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two commonly held beliefs about referral rates were investigated in this study: first that demand for services is determined by supply and secondly that there is wide variation between general practices in their referral rates. All referrals to specialist outpatient clinics were recorded during two 11-week periods by general practitioners in eight practices in the new town of Milton Keynes and in 17 practices elsewhere in the Oxford region. During the first period, only a limited outpatient service was available in the new town; for many specialist services, people had to be referred to hospitals outside the district. Referral rates from Milton Keynes were very similar to those from the rest of the region. By the second period the range of specialist facilities available locally had expanded considerably with the opening of the new district general hospital and during this period there was a statistically significant but rather small increase in referral rates from Milton Keynes. Variation in referral rates between general practices within each geographical group was greater than that between the two groups. Overall, there was about a three-fold variation between general practices in outpatient referral rates which is considerably less than that commonly thought to exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 327","pages":"404-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712124/pdf/jroyalcgprac00010-0009.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13703265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1989-10-01DOI: 10.4324/9780203408674-10
P. Toon
{"title":"HEALTH CARE FOR SINGLE HOMELESS PEOPLE","authors":"P. Toon","doi":"10.4324/9780203408674-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203408674-10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 1","pages":"440-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70584575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Fellowship by assessment.","authors":"G Gaskell","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 327","pages":"435"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712105/pdf/jroyalcgprac00010-0040c.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13703112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A postal questionnaire survey was conducted comparing the workload and remuneration of part-time women principals in group practices in the Northern and Oxford regions. Part time was defined as receiving less than a full profit share at parity. Of 501 women principals 308 (62%) responded of whom 146 (47%) were part-time. Respondents were asked to record aspects of workload over a four-week period for themselves and their full-time partner who did the most sessions within the practice. The results showed that although two-thirds of the part-timers had 50% or less of a full profit share, part-time principals overall did about 76% of the daytime clinical work (surgeries and home visits) done by their full-time partners, excluding specialized clinics. The lower the profit share the wider this discrepancy. Although 33% of the respondents did not out-of-hours work, the remainder did more than their profit share would indicate. Twenty per cent of the 116 principals with 40% or more of a full profit share and 57% of the 30 principals with less than 40% of a full profit share felt that their share was unfair. Lack of involvement in practice business and feeling that opinions did not carry equal weight were associated with feelings of unfairness.
{"title":"Part-time women general practitioners--workload and remuneration.","authors":"J Hooper, J Millar, P Schofield, G Ward","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A postal questionnaire survey was conducted comparing the workload and remuneration of part-time women principals in group practices in the Northern and Oxford regions. Part time was defined as receiving less than a full profit share at parity. Of 501 women principals 308 (62%) responded of whom 146 (47%) were part-time. Respondents were asked to record aspects of workload over a four-week period for themselves and their full-time partner who did the most sessions within the practice. The results showed that although two-thirds of the part-timers had 50% or less of a full profit share, part-time principals overall did about 76% of the daytime clinical work (surgeries and home visits) done by their full-time partners, excluding specialized clinics. The lower the profit share the wider this discrepancy. Although 33% of the respondents did not out-of-hours work, the remainder did more than their profit share would indicate. Twenty per cent of the 116 principals with 40% or more of a full profit share and 57% of the 30 principals with less than 40% of a full profit share felt that their share was unfair. Lack of involvement in practice business and feeling that opinions did not carry equal weight were associated with feelings of unfairness.</p>","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 327","pages":"400-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712111/pdf/jroyalcgprac00010-0005.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13703264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A randomized double-blind crossover trial was conducted to study the effects of pyridoxine (vitamin B6) at a dose of 50 mg per day on symptoms characteristic of the premenstrual syndrome. Sixty three women aged 18-49 years, identified by means of a general practice based survey of menstrual patterns in the community, entered the trial. All of the women had noticed moderate to severe premenstrual symptoms during the previous year. The women kept a daily menstrual diary which graded the severity of nine individual symptoms from zero to three. After completing a diary for an initial month the women were randomized to receive either drug or placebo for three months, after which the treatments were crossed over for a further three months. Thirty two women completed the full seven months of the study. In these women a significant beneficial effect (P less than 0.05) of pyridoxine was observed on emotional type symptoms (depression, irritability and tiredness). No significant effect was observed on premenstrual symptoms of any other type.
{"title":"Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and the premenstrual syndrome: a randomized crossover trial.","authors":"H Doll, S Brown, A Thurston, M Vessey","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized double-blind crossover trial was conducted to study the effects of pyridoxine (vitamin B6) at a dose of 50 mg per day on symptoms characteristic of the premenstrual syndrome. Sixty three women aged 18-49 years, identified by means of a general practice based survey of menstrual patterns in the community, entered the trial. All of the women had noticed moderate to severe premenstrual symptoms during the previous year. The women kept a daily menstrual diary which graded the severity of nine individual symptoms from zero to three. After completing a diary for an initial month the women were randomized to receive either drug or placebo for three months, after which the treatments were crossed over for a further three months. Thirty two women completed the full seven months of the study. In these women a significant beneficial effect (P less than 0.05) of pyridoxine was observed on emotional type symptoms (depression, irritability and tiredness). No significant effect was observed on premenstrual symptoms of any other type.</p>","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 326","pages":"364-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1711872/pdf/jroyalcgprac00009-0011.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13701408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of general practitioner services by a group of intravenous drug users was recorded over two two-year time periods 1984-85 and 1986-87. This was felt to represent the period of maximum change in awareness of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by patients and medical staff. Fifty patients were randomly selected: 25 who were HIV positive and 25 who were HIV negative. Between the two time periods a dramatic increase in consultation rate for both high risk and infected patients attending their general practitioner was recorded (318% and 172% increase, respectively). A small increase in attendance at the accident and emergency department (30% and 34% increase, respectively) was recorded for high risk and infected patients, and there was a large increase in attendance at the infectious diseases unit for infected patients but there was little effect on use of other hospital services. The implications for resource needs in the community are discussed.
{"title":"Human immunodeficiency virus in drug misusers and increased consultation in general practice.","authors":"J J Roberts, C A Skidmore, J R Robertson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of general practitioner services by a group of intravenous drug users was recorded over two two-year time periods 1984-85 and 1986-87. This was felt to represent the period of maximum change in awareness of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by patients and medical staff. Fifty patients were randomly selected: 25 who were HIV positive and 25 who were HIV negative. Between the two time periods a dramatic increase in consultation rate for both high risk and infected patients attending their general practitioner was recorded (318% and 172% increase, respectively). A small increase in attendance at the accident and emergency department (30% and 34% increase, respectively) was recorded for high risk and infected patients, and there was a large increase in attendance at the infectious diseases unit for infected patients but there was little effect on use of other hospital services. The implications for resource needs in the community are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75129,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":"39 326","pages":"373-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1711873/pdf/jroyalcgprac00009-0020.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"13701410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}