Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01631-4
Emma L Anderson
A recent paper concluded that cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition may be a viable target to treat dementia, based on human genetic evidence of a protective effect of target inhibition on risk of Lewy body and Parkinson's dementia. Alzheimer's disease, which is by far the most prevalent cause of dementia (around 80% of all dementia cases) was not included as an outcome. Evidence shows CETP inhibition is unlikely to affect Alzheimer's risk and may even potentially modestly increase risk. There is also little evidence to support an effect of CETP inhibition on all-cause or vascular dementia. Thus, CETP inhibition is unlikely to be a viable target to treat the most prevalent causes of dementia.
{"title":"Response to Schmidt et al.: Lower activity of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and the risk of dementia: a Mendelian randomization analysis.","authors":"Emma L Anderson","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01631-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01631-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent paper concluded that cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition may be a viable target to treat dementia, based on human genetic evidence of a protective effect of target inhibition on risk of Lewy body and Parkinson's dementia. Alzheimer's disease, which is by far the most prevalent cause of dementia (around 80% of all dementia cases) was not included as an outcome. Evidence shows CETP inhibition is unlikely to affect Alzheimer's risk and may even potentially modestly increase risk. There is also little evidence to support an effect of CETP inhibition on all-cause or vascular dementia. Thus, CETP inhibition is unlikely to be a viable target to treat the most prevalent causes of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"264"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660916/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01630-5
Anna L Wojdała, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Sherif Bayoumy, Daniel Antwi-Berko, Nathalie Le Bastard, Wiesje M van der Flier, Andreas Jeromin, Charlotte Lambrechts, Maxime Van Loo, Manu Vandijck, Erik Stoops, Inge M W Verberk, Charlotte E Teunissen
Background: Among the Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers measured in blood, phosphorylated forms of tau (p-tau) have been shown to exhibit a particularly high diagnostic potential. Here, we performed a comprehensive method comparison study, followed by evaluation of the diagnostic performance of eight recent plasma p-tau immunoassays targeting different tau phosphorylation sites, different tau fragments, and that are measured by two distinct platforms.
Methods: We enrolled a cohort of 40 patients with AD at the stage of dementia (AD-dem) characterized by positive CSF A + T + profile, and a control group of 40 cognitively healthy participants (Control), to conduct a comprehensive method comparison for three plasma p-tau181 and five plasma p-tau217 assays run on the Simoa® HD-X™ or Lumipulse® G600II/G1200 platforms. Design of the compared assays differed in regard to: (1) tau phosphorylation site targeted by the capture antibody (T181 or T217), and (2) epitope of the pan-tau detector antibody (N-terminal or mid-region). For each of the assays we determined precision and analytical sensitivity parameters and used Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots for pairwise comparison of p-tau181 or p-tau217 assays. Subsequently, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of all the assays for discrimination between AD-dem and Control groups.
Results: We found a strong, positive correlation between all the measurements. Fixed and/or proportional bias was observed for each of compared p-tau181 assay pairs or p-tau217 assay pairs. While both plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 levels were significantly increased in AD-dem vs. Control groups as measured by all assays, higher median concentration AD-dem/Control fold change and AUC values were observed for p-tau217 (assays range: fold change 3.72-6.74, AUC 0.916-0.956) compared with p-tau181 (assays range 1.81-2.94, AUC 0.829-0.909), independently of the platform used. No significant differences were observed between diagnostic performance of p-tau181 assays or p-tau217 assays targeting tau N-terminus or mid-region.
Conclusions: Although all plasma p-tau measurements enabled discrimination between clinical groups, p-tau217 assays showed the highest robustness, independently of the pan-tau detector antibody targeting N-terminal or mid-region, and independently of the platform used. Considering the observed method disagreement in measured absolute concentrations, we stress the need for development of certified reference material, harmonizing measurements across different platforms.
背景:在血液中测量的阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物中,磷酸化形式的tau (p-tau)已被证明具有特别高的诊断潜力。在这里,我们进行了一项全面的方法比较研究,随后评估了最近针对不同tau磷酸化位点,不同tau片段的8种血浆p-tau免疫测定的诊断性能,并通过两种不同的平台进行测量。方法:我们招募了40名以CSF a + T +谱阳性为特征的AD痴呆期(AD-dem)患者和40名认知健康的对照组(control),在Simoa®HD-X™或Lumipulse®G600II/G1200平台上进行三种血浆p-tau181和五种血浆p-tau217检测的综合方法比较。比较试验的设计在以下方面有所不同:(1)捕获抗体(T181或T217)靶向的tau磷酸化位点;(2)pan-tau检测抗体的表位(n端或中部)。对于每一项检测,我们确定了精度和分析灵敏度参数,并使用pass - bablok回归和Bland-Altman图对p-tau181或p-tau217检测进行两两比较。随后,我们评估了AD-dem和对照组之间所有检测方法的诊断准确性。结果:我们发现所有测量值之间存在很强的正相关。p-tau181测定对或p-tau217测定对均观察到固定和/或比例偏倚。虽然AD-dem组血浆p-tau181和p-tau217水平均显著高于对照组,但与使用的平台无关,AD-dem/对照组p-tau217的中位浓度(测定范围:3.72-6.74,AUC 0.916-0.956)与p-tau181(测定范围:1.81-2.94,AUC 0.829-0.909)相比,p-tau217(测定范围:3.72-6.74,AUC 0.916)的fold change和AUC值更高。p-tau181检测和p-tau217检测在tau蛋白n端或中间区域的诊断性能没有显著差异。结论:尽管所有血浆p-tau测量都可以在临床组之间进行区分,但p-tau217检测显示出最高的稳健性,独立于针对n端或中间区域的pan-tau检测器抗体,也独立于所使用的平台。考虑到在测量的绝对浓度中观察到的方法分歧,我们强调需要开发经过认证的参考物质,协调不同平台的测量。
{"title":"Analytical and clinical performance of eight Simoa<sup>®</sup> and Lumipulse<sup>®</sup> assays for automated measurement of plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217.","authors":"Anna L Wojdała, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Sherif Bayoumy, Daniel Antwi-Berko, Nathalie Le Bastard, Wiesje M van der Flier, Andreas Jeromin, Charlotte Lambrechts, Maxime Van Loo, Manu Vandijck, Erik Stoops, Inge M W Verberk, Charlotte E Teunissen","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01630-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01630-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers measured in blood, phosphorylated forms of tau (p-tau) have been shown to exhibit a particularly high diagnostic potential. Here, we performed a comprehensive method comparison study, followed by evaluation of the diagnostic performance of eight recent plasma p-tau immunoassays targeting different tau phosphorylation sites, different tau fragments, and that are measured by two distinct platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled a cohort of 40 patients with AD at the stage of dementia (AD-dem) characterized by positive CSF A + T + profile, and a control group of 40 cognitively healthy participants (Control), to conduct a comprehensive method comparison for three plasma p-tau181 and five plasma p-tau217 assays run on the Simoa<sup>®</sup> HD-X™ or Lumipulse<sup>®</sup> G600II/G1200 platforms. Design of the compared assays differed in regard to: (1) tau phosphorylation site targeted by the capture antibody (T181 or T217), and (2) epitope of the pan-tau detector antibody (N-terminal or mid-region). For each of the assays we determined precision and analytical sensitivity parameters and used Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots for pairwise comparison of p-tau181 or p-tau217 assays. Subsequently, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of all the assays for discrimination between AD-dem and Control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a strong, positive correlation between all the measurements. Fixed and/or proportional bias was observed for each of compared p-tau181 assay pairs or p-tau217 assay pairs. While both plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 levels were significantly increased in AD-dem vs. Control groups as measured by all assays, higher median concentration AD-dem/Control fold change and AUC values were observed for p-tau217 (assays range: fold change 3.72-6.74, AUC 0.916-0.956) compared with p-tau181 (assays range 1.81-2.94, AUC 0.829-0.909), independently of the platform used. No significant differences were observed between diagnostic performance of p-tau181 assays or p-tau217 assays targeting tau N-terminus or mid-region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although all plasma p-tau measurements enabled discrimination between clinical groups, p-tau217 assays showed the highest robustness, independently of the pan-tau detector antibody targeting N-terminal or mid-region, and independently of the platform used. Considering the observed method disagreement in measured absolute concentrations, we stress the need for development of certified reference material, harmonizing measurements across different platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"266"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660642/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142862768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01636-z
Yuta Katsumi, Ryan Eckbo, Marianne Chapleau, Bonnie Wong, Scott M McGinnis, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Bradford C Dickerson, Deepti Putcha
Background: Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA) is a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive visuospatial and visuoperceptual impairment. As the neurodegenerative disease progresses, patients lose independent functioning due to the worsening of initial symptoms and development of symptoms in other cognitive domains. The timeline of clinical progression is variable across patients, and the field currently lacks robust methods for prognostication. Here, evaluated the utility of MRI-based cortical atrophy as a predictor of longitudinal clinical decline in a sample of PCA patients.
Methods: PCA patients were recruited through the Massachusetts General Hospital Frontotemporal Disorders Unit PCA Program. All patients had cortical thickness estimates from baseline MRI scans, which were used to predict longitudinal change in clinical impairment assessed by the CDR Sum-of-Boxes (CDR-SB) score. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate the magnitude of cortical atrophy in PCA patients relative to a group of amyloid-negative cognitively unimpaired participants. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test hypotheses about the utility of baseline cortical atrophy for predicting longitudinal clinical decline.
Results: Data acquired from 34 PCA patients (mean age = 65.41 ± 7.90, 71% females) and 24 controls (mean age = 67.34 ± 4.93, 50% females) were analyzed. 62% of the PCA patients were classified as having mild cognitive impairment (CDR 0.5) at baseline, with the rest having mild dementia (CDR 1). Each patient had at least one clinical follow-up, with the mean duration of 2.78 ± 1.62 years. Relative to controls, PCA patients showed prominent baseline atrophy in the posterior cortical regions, with the largest effect size observed in the visual network of the cerebral cortex. Cortical atrophy localized to the dorsal attention network, which supports higher-order visuospatial function, selectively predicted the rate of subsequent clinical decline.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate the utility of a snapshot measure of cortical atrophy of the dorsal attention network for predicting the rate of subsequent clinical decline in PCA. If replicated, this topographically-specific MRI-based biomarker could be useful as a clinical prognostication tool that facilitates personalized care planning.
{"title":"Greater baseline cortical atrophy in the dorsal attention network predicts faster clinical decline in Posterior Cortical Atrophy.","authors":"Yuta Katsumi, Ryan Eckbo, Marianne Chapleau, Bonnie Wong, Scott M McGinnis, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Bradford C Dickerson, Deepti Putcha","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01636-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01636-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA) is a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive visuospatial and visuoperceptual impairment. As the neurodegenerative disease progresses, patients lose independent functioning due to the worsening of initial symptoms and development of symptoms in other cognitive domains. The timeline of clinical progression is variable across patients, and the field currently lacks robust methods for prognostication. Here, evaluated the utility of MRI-based cortical atrophy as a predictor of longitudinal clinical decline in a sample of PCA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PCA patients were recruited through the Massachusetts General Hospital Frontotemporal Disorders Unit PCA Program. All patients had cortical thickness estimates from baseline MRI scans, which were used to predict longitudinal change in clinical impairment assessed by the CDR Sum-of-Boxes (CDR-SB) score. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate the magnitude of cortical atrophy in PCA patients relative to a group of amyloid-negative cognitively unimpaired participants. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test hypotheses about the utility of baseline cortical atrophy for predicting longitudinal clinical decline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data acquired from 34 PCA patients (mean age = 65.41 ± 7.90, 71% females) and 24 controls (mean age = 67.34 ± 4.93, 50% females) were analyzed. 62% of the PCA patients were classified as having mild cognitive impairment (CDR 0.5) at baseline, with the rest having mild dementia (CDR 1). Each patient had at least one clinical follow-up, with the mean duration of 2.78 ± 1.62 years. Relative to controls, PCA patients showed prominent baseline atrophy in the posterior cortical regions, with the largest effect size observed in the visual network of the cerebral cortex. Cortical atrophy localized to the dorsal attention network, which supports higher-order visuospatial function, selectively predicted the rate of subsequent clinical decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate the utility of a snapshot measure of cortical atrophy of the dorsal attention network for predicting the rate of subsequent clinical decline in PCA. If replicated, this topographically-specific MRI-based biomarker could be useful as a clinical prognostication tool that facilitates personalized care planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"262"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653806/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142852027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-05DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01634-1
Pedro Câmara Pestana, Sandra Cardoso, Manuela Guerreiro, João Maroco, Frank Jessen, Frederico Simões do Couto, Alexandre de Mendonça
Background: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is recognized as a risk stage for future cognitive impairment and dementia. The criteria for SCD include normal performance on neuropsychological testing; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding standard score cut-offs for neuropsychological tests to define cognitive impairment and to differentiate between SCD and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). This study aimed to assess the frequency of SCD diagnosis using various neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality and to characterize the sociodemographic and neuropsychological features of SCD patients diagnosed under these criteria.
Methods: The Cognitive Complaints Cohort (CCC) participants were diagnosed following Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) criteria. Normal cognitive performance was defined by the absence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to the five sets of MCI neuropsychologically based criteria defined by Jak and Bondi. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze sociodemographic, clinical, and neuropsychological data. A bootstrap methodology was employed to estimate the mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for specific parameters of interest, namely the SMC scale (subjective memory complaints scale), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Blessed Dementia Rating Scale - first part (BDRS first part), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
Results: Among the 1268 subjects included, the prevalence of SCD diagnosis exhibited substantial variation across SCD-I criteria using different neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality (ranging from 16.4 to 81.3%). When using the most conservative criteria to define cognitive impairment (2 tests within a cognitive domain > 1.5 SD below age-adjusted means), the resulting Conservative SCD group had poorer global cognitive function (MMSE: mean 27.15, 95% CI 27.00-27.31), whereas when using the most liberal criteria to define cognitive impairment (only one test > 1 SD below age-adjusted means) the resulting Liberal SCD group had superior performance in daily-life functioning (BDRS first part: mean 0.30, 95% CI 0.23-0.38). However, subjective cognitive complaints and neuropsychiatric symptoms did not significantly differ among SCD diagnostic groups.
Conclusions: The utilization of diagnostic criteria using distinct neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality significantly impacts the frequency of SCD diagnosis and characterizes different patient populations. Consequently, it is essential to specify the criterion when diagnosing a SCD patient and to understand the risks and benefits of using different criteria to define cognitive impairment.
背景:主观认知衰退(SCD)被认为是未来认知障碍和痴呆的危险阶段。SCD的诊断标准包括:神经心理测试表现正常;然而,对于定义认知障碍和区分SCD和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的神经心理学测试的标准分数截止点缺乏共识。本研究旨在利用各种认知正常的神经心理学定义来评估SCD的诊断频率,并描述在这些标准下诊断的SCD患者的社会人口学和神经心理学特征。方法:认知抱怨队列(CCC)参与者按照主观认知衰退主动性(SCD-I)标准进行诊断。根据Jak和Bondi定义的五套基于神经心理学的MCI标准,正常的认知表现被定义为没有轻度认知障碍(MCI)。描述性统计用于分析社会人口学、临床和神经心理学数据。采用bootstrap方法估计特定参数的平均值和95%置信区间(CI),即SMC量表(主观记忆抱怨量表),迷你精神状态检查(MMSE),祝福痴呆评定量表-第一部分(BDRS第一部分)和老年抑郁症量表(GDS)。结果:在纳入的1268名受试者中,SCD诊断的患病率在使用不同神经心理学认知正常定义的SCD- i标准中表现出实质性差异(范围从16.4%到81.3%)。当使用最保守的标准来定义认知障碍时(2次测试在认知领域内,低于年龄调整平均值1.5 SD),结果保守SCD组整体认知功能较差(MMSE:平均值27.15,95% CI 27.00-27.31),而当使用最自由的标准来定义认知障碍时(只有一次测试,低于年龄调整平均值1 SD),结果自由SCD组在日常生活功能方面表现较好(BDRS第一部分:平均值0.30,95% CI 0.23-0.38)。然而,主观认知主诉和神经精神症状在SCD诊断组之间没有显著差异。结论:使用认知正常的不同神经心理学定义的诊断标准显著影响SCD的诊断频率,并具有不同患者群体的特征。因此,在诊断SCD患者时,必须明确诊断标准,并了解使用不同标准来定义认知障碍的风险和益处。
{"title":"Frequency, sociodemographic, and neuropsychological features of patients with subjective cognitive decline diagnosed using different neuropsychological criteria.","authors":"Pedro Câmara Pestana, Sandra Cardoso, Manuela Guerreiro, João Maroco, Frank Jessen, Frederico Simões do Couto, Alexandre de Mendonça","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01634-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01634-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is recognized as a risk stage for future cognitive impairment and dementia. The criteria for SCD include normal performance on neuropsychological testing; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding standard score cut-offs for neuropsychological tests to define cognitive impairment and to differentiate between SCD and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). This study aimed to assess the frequency of SCD diagnosis using various neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality and to characterize the sociodemographic and neuropsychological features of SCD patients diagnosed under these criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cognitive Complaints Cohort (CCC) participants were diagnosed following Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) criteria. Normal cognitive performance was defined by the absence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to the five sets of MCI neuropsychologically based criteria defined by Jak and Bondi. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze sociodemographic, clinical, and neuropsychological data. A bootstrap methodology was employed to estimate the mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for specific parameters of interest, namely the SMC scale (subjective memory complaints scale), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Blessed Dementia Rating Scale - first part (BDRS first part), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1268 subjects included, the prevalence of SCD diagnosis exhibited substantial variation across SCD-I criteria using different neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality (ranging from 16.4 to 81.3%). When using the most conservative criteria to define cognitive impairment (2 tests within a cognitive domain > 1.5 SD below age-adjusted means), the resulting Conservative SCD group had poorer global cognitive function (MMSE: mean 27.15, 95% CI 27.00-27.31), whereas when using the most liberal criteria to define cognitive impairment (only one test > 1 SD below age-adjusted means) the resulting Liberal SCD group had superior performance in daily-life functioning (BDRS first part: mean 0.30, 95% CI 0.23-0.38). However, subjective cognitive complaints and neuropsychiatric symptoms did not significantly differ among SCD diagnostic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The utilization of diagnostic criteria using distinct neuropsychological definitions of cognitive normality significantly impacts the frequency of SCD diagnosis and characterizes different patient populations. Consequently, it is essential to specify the criterion when diagnosing a SCD patient and to understand the risks and benefits of using different criteria to define cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"261"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142783855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01625-2
Eun Hye Lee, Heejin Yoo, Young Ju Kim, Bo Kyoung Cheon, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Jihwan Yun, Hyemin Jang, Jun Pyo Kim, Hee Jin Kim, Seong-Beom Koh, Jee Hyang Jeong, Duk L Na, Sang Won Seo, Sung Hoon Kang
{"title":"Correction: Different associations between body mass index and Alzheimer's markers depending on metabolic health.","authors":"Eun Hye Lee, Heejin Yoo, Young Ju Kim, Bo Kyoung Cheon, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Jihwan Yun, Hyemin Jang, Jun Pyo Kim, Hee Jin Kim, Seong-Beom Koh, Jee Hyang Jeong, Duk L Na, Sang Won Seo, Sung Hoon Kang","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01625-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01625-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"260"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610083/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142765435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-30DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01623-4
Kyonghwan Choe, Muhammad Ali, Roy Lardenoije, Renzo J M Riemens, Ehsan Pishva, Horst Bickel, Siegfried Weyerer, Per Hoffmann, Michael Pentzek, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Birgitt Wiese, Martin Scherer, Michael Wagner, Diego Mastroeni, Paul D Coleman, Alfredo Ramirez, Inez H G B Ramakers, Frans R J Verhey, Bart P F Rutten, Gunter Kenis, Daniel L A van den Hove
Background: Neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), have been linked to alterations in tryptophan (TRP) metabolism. However, no studies to date have systematically explored changes in the TRP pathway at both transcriptional and epigenetic levels. This study aimed to investigate transcriptomic, DNA methylomic (5mC) and hydroxymethylomic (5hmC) changes within genes involved in the TRP and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) pathways in AD, using three independent cohorts.
Methods: DNA derived from post-mortem middle temporal gyrus (MTG) tissue from AD patients (n = 45) and age-matched controls (n = 35) was analyzed, along with DNA derived from blood samples from two independent cohorts: the German Study on Ageing, Cognition, and Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe) cohort (n = 96) and the Dutch BioBank Alzheimer Center Limburg (BBACL) cohort (n = 262). Molecular profiling, including assessing mRNA expression and DNA (hydroxy)methylation levels, was conducted using HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip and HM 450 K BeadChip arrays, respectively. Functional interactions between genes and identification of common phenotype-specific positive and negative elementary circuits were conducted using computational modeling, i.e. gene regulatory network (GRN) and network perturbational analysis. DNA methylation of IDO2 (cg11251498) was analyzed using pyrosequencing.
Results: Twelve TRP- and twenty NAD-associated genes were found to be differentially expressed in the MTG of AD patients. Gene sets associated in the kynurenine pathway, the most common TRP pathway, and NAD pathway, showed enrichment at the mRNA expression level. Downstream analyses integrating data on gene expression, DNA (hydroxy)methylation, and AD pathology, as well as GRN and network perturbation analyses, identified IDO2, an immune regulatory gene, as a key candidate in AD. Notably, one CpG site in IDO2 (cg11251498) exhibited significant methylation differences between AD converters and non-converters in the AgeCoDe cohort.
Conclusion: These findings reveal substantial transcriptional and epigenetic alterations in TRP- and NAD-pathway-associated genes in AD, highlighting IDO2 as a key candidate gene for further investigation. These genes and their encoded proteins hold potential as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for AD.
{"title":"Alzheimer's disease-specific transcriptomic and epigenomic changes in the tryptophan catabolic pathway.","authors":"Kyonghwan Choe, Muhammad Ali, Roy Lardenoije, Renzo J M Riemens, Ehsan Pishva, Horst Bickel, Siegfried Weyerer, Per Hoffmann, Michael Pentzek, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Birgitt Wiese, Martin Scherer, Michael Wagner, Diego Mastroeni, Paul D Coleman, Alfredo Ramirez, Inez H G B Ramakers, Frans R J Verhey, Bart P F Rutten, Gunter Kenis, Daniel L A van den Hove","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01623-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01623-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), have been linked to alterations in tryptophan (TRP) metabolism. However, no studies to date have systematically explored changes in the TRP pathway at both transcriptional and epigenetic levels. This study aimed to investigate transcriptomic, DNA methylomic (5mC) and hydroxymethylomic (5hmC) changes within genes involved in the TRP and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) pathways in AD, using three independent cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DNA derived from post-mortem middle temporal gyrus (MTG) tissue from AD patients (n = 45) and age-matched controls (n = 35) was analyzed, along with DNA derived from blood samples from two independent cohorts: the German Study on Ageing, Cognition, and Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe) cohort (n = 96) and the Dutch BioBank Alzheimer Center Limburg (BBACL) cohort (n = 262). Molecular profiling, including assessing mRNA expression and DNA (hydroxy)methylation levels, was conducted using HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip and HM 450 K BeadChip arrays, respectively. Functional interactions between genes and identification of common phenotype-specific positive and negative elementary circuits were conducted using computational modeling, i.e. gene regulatory network (GRN) and network perturbational analysis. DNA methylation of IDO2 (cg11251498) was analyzed using pyrosequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve TRP- and twenty NAD-associated genes were found to be differentially expressed in the MTG of AD patients. Gene sets associated in the kynurenine pathway, the most common TRP pathway, and NAD pathway, showed enrichment at the mRNA expression level. Downstream analyses integrating data on gene expression, DNA (hydroxy)methylation, and AD pathology, as well as GRN and network perturbation analyses, identified IDO2, an immune regulatory gene, as a key candidate in AD. Notably, one CpG site in IDO2 (cg11251498) exhibited significant methylation differences between AD converters and non-converters in the AgeCoDe cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reveal substantial transcriptional and epigenetic alterations in TRP- and NAD-pathway-associated genes in AD, highlighting IDO2 as a key candidate gene for further investigation. These genes and their encoded proteins hold potential as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"259"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142765432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-28DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01624-3
Douglas M Lopes, Jack A Wells, Da Ma, Lauren Wallis, Daniel Park, Sophie K Llewellyn, Zeshan Ahmed, Mark F Lythgoe, Ian F Harrison
{"title":"Correction: Glymphatic inhibition exacerbates tau propagation in an Alzheimer's disease model.","authors":"Douglas M Lopes, Jack A Wells, Da Ma, Lauren Wallis, Daniel Park, Sophie K Llewellyn, Zeshan Ahmed, Mark F Lythgoe, Ian F Harrison","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01624-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01624-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"258"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603969/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142738109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-28DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01622-5
Matteo Tonietto, Oscar Sotolongo-Grau, Núria Roé-Vellvé, Santiago Bullich, Juan Pablo Tartari, Ángela Sanabria, Ainhoa García-Sánchez, Edilio Borroni, Christopher Galli, Esther Pérez-Martínez, Joan Castell-Conesa, Isabel Roca, Lluís Tárraga, Agustín Ruiz, Andrew W Stephens, Mercè Boada, Gregory Klein, Marta Marquié
Background: Second-generation tau tracers for positron emission tomography (PET) show high affinity for paired helical filaments tau deposits characteristic of Alzheimer´s disease and low off-target binding. Differences in their chemical structure though may lead to variations in their regional tau uptake and off-target signal. In this work, we aimed to compare the in-vivo uptake of tau tracers [18F]PI-2620 and [18F]RO948 in the early stages of the AD continuum.
Methods: Data from the TAU-PET FACEHBI clinical trial (EUDRA-CT 2021-000473-83) were analyzed. All participants were non-demented and underwent tau imaging with [18F]PI-2620 and [18F]RO948 PET within 3 months, amyloid imaging with [18F]Florbetaben and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Tau PET standardized uptake values ratios (SUVR) were calculated in Braak and typical off-target regions using the inferior cerebellar cortex as a reference region.
Results: The cohort consisted of 18 individuals with subjective cognitive decline (n = 13) and mild cognitive impairment (n = 5), with centiloid values ranging from 17 to 159. Both tau tracers showed similar tau pathology distribution but presented a distinct off-target signal pattern on visual read. SUVR measurements for [18F]PI-2620 and [18F]RO948 were highly correlated in all Braak regions (R2 range [0.65-0.80]). Regarding off-target signal, [18F]PI-2620 had higher SUVRs in vascular structures, and [18F]RO948 had higher SUVRs in the skull/meninges.
Conclusions: In a cohort of individuals at early stages of the AD continuum, tau PET tracers [18F]PI-2620 and [18F]RO948 showed similar in-vivo uptake in all Braak regions and distinct off-target signal. These preliminary results support the development of standardized quantification scales for tau deposition that are tracer-independent.
Trial registration: AEMPS EudraCT 2021-000473-83. Registered 30 December 2021.
背景:用于正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的第二代 tau 示踪剂对阿尔茨海默病特有的成对螺旋丝 tau 沉积物具有高亲和力,而脱靶结合率低。不过,它们化学结构的差异可能会导致其区域性 tau 吸收和脱靶信号的不同。在这项工作中,我们旨在比较tau示踪剂[18F]PI-2620和[18F]RO948在AD早期阶段的体内摄取情况:分析了TAU-PET FACEHBI临床试验(EUDRA-CT 2021-000473-83)的数据。所有参与者均未痴呆,并在3个月内接受了[18F]PI-2620和[18F]RO948 PET的tau成像、[18F]Florbetaben的淀粉样蛋白成像和脑磁共振成像。以小脑下皮层为参照区域,计算布拉克和典型脱靶区域的 Tau PET 标准化摄取值比(SUVR):研究对象包括18名主观认知能力下降患者(13人)和轻度认知障碍患者(5人),中心值从17到159不等。两种tau示踪剂显示出相似的tau病理分布,但在视觉读数上呈现出明显的脱靶信号模式。[18F]PI-2620和[18F]RO948的SUVR测量值在所有Braak区域都高度相关(R2范围为[0.65-0.80])。关于脱靶信号,[18F]PI-2620在血管结构中的SUVR较高,而[18F]RO948在颅骨/脑膜中的SUVR较高:结论:在一组处于AD早期阶段的个体中,tau PET示踪剂[18F]PI-2620和[18F]RO948在所有Braak区域显示出相似的体内摄取和不同的脱靶信号。这些初步结果支持开发与示踪剂无关的tau沉积标准化量化标度:试验注册:AEMPS EudraCT 2021-000473-83。注册日期:2021 年 12 月 30 日。
{"title":"Head-to-head comparison of tau PET tracers [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 and [<sup>18</sup>F]RO948 in non-demented individuals with brain amyloid deposition: the TAU-PET FACEHBI cohort.","authors":"Matteo Tonietto, Oscar Sotolongo-Grau, Núria Roé-Vellvé, Santiago Bullich, Juan Pablo Tartari, Ángela Sanabria, Ainhoa García-Sánchez, Edilio Borroni, Christopher Galli, Esther Pérez-Martínez, Joan Castell-Conesa, Isabel Roca, Lluís Tárraga, Agustín Ruiz, Andrew W Stephens, Mercè Boada, Gregory Klein, Marta Marquié","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01622-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01622-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Second-generation tau tracers for positron emission tomography (PET) show high affinity for paired helical filaments tau deposits characteristic of Alzheimer´s disease and low off-target binding. Differences in their chemical structure though may lead to variations in their regional tau uptake and off-target signal. In this work, we aimed to compare the in-vivo uptake of tau tracers [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 and [<sup>18</sup>F]RO948 in the early stages of the AD continuum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the TAU-PET FACEHBI clinical trial (EUDRA-CT 2021-000473-83) were analyzed. All participants were non-demented and underwent tau imaging with [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 and [<sup>18</sup>F]RO948 PET within 3 months, amyloid imaging with [<sup>18</sup>F]Florbetaben and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Tau PET standardized uptake values ratios (SUVR) were calculated in Braak and typical off-target regions using the inferior cerebellar cortex as a reference region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 18 individuals with subjective cognitive decline (n = 13) and mild cognitive impairment (n = 5), with centiloid values ranging from 17 to 159. Both tau tracers showed similar tau pathology distribution but presented a distinct off-target signal pattern on visual read. SUVR measurements for [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 and [<sup>18</sup>F]RO948 were highly correlated in all Braak regions (R<sup>2</sup> range [0.65-0.80]). Regarding off-target signal, [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 had higher SUVRs in vascular structures, and [<sup>18</sup>F]RO948 had higher SUVRs in the skull/meninges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a cohort of individuals at early stages of the AD continuum, tau PET tracers [<sup>18</sup>F]PI-2620 and [<sup>18</sup>F]RO948 showed similar in-vivo uptake in all Braak regions and distinct off-target signal. These preliminary results support the development of standardized quantification scales for tau deposition that are tracer-independent.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>AEMPS EudraCT 2021-000473-83. Registered 30 December 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603960/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142738116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01614-5
Aniek M van Gils, Antti Tolonen, Argonde C van Harten, Sinthujah Vigneswaran, Frederik Barkhof, Leonie N C Visser, Juha Koikkalainen, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Steen Gregers Hasselbalch, Patrizia Mecocci, Anne M Remes, Hilkka Soininen, Afina W Lemstra, Charlotte E Teunissen, Linus Jönsson, Jyrki Lötjönen, Wiesje M van der Flier, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
Background: The increasing prevalence of dementia and the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) highlight the need for efficient diagnostic pathways in memory clinics. We present a data-driven approach to efficiently guide stepwise diagnostic testing for three clinical scenarios: 1) syndrome diagnosis, 2) etiological diagnosis, and 3) eligibility for DMT.
Methods: We used data from two memory clinic cohorts (ADC, PredictND), including 504 patients with dementia (302 Alzheimer's disease, 107 frontotemporal dementia, 35 vascular dementia, 60 dementia with Lewy bodies), 191 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 188 cognitively normal controls (CN). Tests included digital cognitive screening (cCOG), neuropsychological and functional assessment (NP), MRI with automated quantification, and CSF biomarkers. Sequential testing followed a predetermined order, guided by diagnostic certainty. Diagnostic certainty was determined using a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that generates a disease state index (DSI, 0-1), indicating the probability of the syndrome diagnosis or underlying etiology. Diagnosis was confirmed if the DSI exceeded a predefined threshold based on sensitivity/specificity cutoffs relevant to each clinical scenario. Diagnostic accuracy and the need for additional testing were assessed at each step.
Results: Using cCOG as a prescreener for 1) syndrome diagnosis has the potential to accurately reduce the need for extensive NP (42%), resulting in syndrome diagnosis in all patients, with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.71, which was comparable to using NP alone. For 2) etiological diagnosis, stepwise testing resulted in an etiological diagnosis in 80% of patients with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.77, with MRI needed in 77%, and CSF in 37%. When 3) determining DMT eligibility, stepwise testing (100% cCOG, 83% NP, 75% MRI) selected 60% of the patients for confirmatory CSF testing and eventually identified 90% of the potentially eligible patients with AD dementia.
Conclusions: Different diagnostic pathways are accurate and efficient depending on the setting. As such, a data-driven tool holds promise for assisting clinicians in selecting tests of added value across different clinical contexts. This becomes especially important with DMT availability, where the need for more efficient diagnostic pathways is crucial to maintain the accessibility and affordability of dementia diagnoses.
{"title":"Computerized decision support to optimally funnel patients through the diagnostic pathway for dementia.","authors":"Aniek M van Gils, Antti Tolonen, Argonde C van Harten, Sinthujah Vigneswaran, Frederik Barkhof, Leonie N C Visser, Juha Koikkalainen, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka, Steen Gregers Hasselbalch, Patrizia Mecocci, Anne M Remes, Hilkka Soininen, Afina W Lemstra, Charlotte E Teunissen, Linus Jönsson, Jyrki Lötjönen, Wiesje M van der Flier, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01614-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01614-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing prevalence of dementia and the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) highlight the need for efficient diagnostic pathways in memory clinics. We present a data-driven approach to efficiently guide stepwise diagnostic testing for three clinical scenarios: 1) syndrome diagnosis, 2) etiological diagnosis, and 3) eligibility for DMT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from two memory clinic cohorts (ADC, PredictND), including 504 patients with dementia (302 Alzheimer's disease, 107 frontotemporal dementia, 35 vascular dementia, 60 dementia with Lewy bodies), 191 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 188 cognitively normal controls (CN). Tests included digital cognitive screening (cCOG), neuropsychological and functional assessment (NP), MRI with automated quantification, and CSF biomarkers. Sequential testing followed a predetermined order, guided by diagnostic certainty. Diagnostic certainty was determined using a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that generates a disease state index (DSI, 0-1), indicating the probability of the syndrome diagnosis or underlying etiology. Diagnosis was confirmed if the DSI exceeded a predefined threshold based on sensitivity/specificity cutoffs relevant to each clinical scenario. Diagnostic accuracy and the need for additional testing were assessed at each step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using cCOG as a prescreener for 1) syndrome diagnosis has the potential to accurately reduce the need for extensive NP (42%), resulting in syndrome diagnosis in all patients, with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.71, which was comparable to using NP alone. For 2) etiological diagnosis, stepwise testing resulted in an etiological diagnosis in 80% of patients with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.77, with MRI needed in 77%, and CSF in 37%. When 3) determining DMT eligibility, stepwise testing (100% cCOG, 83% NP, 75% MRI) selected 60% of the patients for confirmatory CSF testing and eventually identified 90% of the potentially eligible patients with AD dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different diagnostic pathways are accurate and efficient depending on the setting. As such, a data-driven tool holds promise for assisting clinicians in selecting tests of added value across different clinical contexts. This becomes especially important with DMT availability, where the need for more efficient diagnostic pathways is crucial to maintain the accessibility and affordability of dementia diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142715013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-23DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01620-7
Branislav Kovacech, Nicholas C Cullen, Petr Novak, Jozef Hanes, Eva Kontsekova, Stanislav Katina, Vojtech Parrak, Michal Fresser, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Howard H Feldman, Bengt Winblad, Erik Stoops, Eugeen Vanmechelen, Norbert Zilka
Background: The spread of tau pathology closely correlates with the disease course and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Tau-targeting immunotherapies are being developed to stop the spread of tau pathology and thus halt disease progression. In this post hoc analysis of the ADAMANT clinical trial, we examined the performance of AADvac1, an active immunotherapy targeting the microtubule-binding region (MTBR) of tau, in a subgroup of participants with elevated plasma p-tau217, indicating AD-related neuropathological changes.
Methods: ADAMANT was a 24-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blinded, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial in subjects with mild AD. The trial participants were randomized 3:2 to receive six doses of AADvac1 or placebo at 4-week intervals, followed by five booster doses at 14-week intervals. The primary outcome was safety. The secondary outcomes were the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living score for Mild Cognitive Impairment 18-item version (ADCS-ADL-MCI-18), and immunogenicity. Volumetric MRI, plasma neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were exploratory outcomes. The inclusion criterion for this post-hoc analysis was a baseline plasma p-tau217 level above the cutoff for AD.
Results: Among 196 ADAMANT participants, 137 were positive for plasma p-tau217 (mean age 71.4 years, 59% women). AADvac1 was safe and well tolerated in this subgroup. AADvac1 reduced the rate of accumulation of log-plasma NfL by 56% and that of GFAP by 73%. The treatment differences in the CDR-SB and ADCS-ADL-MCI-18 scores favored AADvac1 but were not statistically significant. AADvac1 had no effect on whole-brain volume but nonsignificantly reduced the loss of brain cortical tissue in several regions. Importantly, the impact on the study outcomes was more pronounced in participants with higher anti-tau antibody levels.
Conclusions: These results suggest that AADvac1 tau immunotherapy can reduce plasma biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. These findings and possible observations on brain atrophy and cognition are hypothesis-generating and warrant further evaluation in a larger clinical trial.
Trial registration: EudraCT 2015-000630-30 (primary) and NCT02579252.
背景:tau病理学的扩散与阿尔茨海默病(AD)的病程和认知能力下降密切相关。目前正在开发以 Tau 为靶点的免疫疗法,以阻止 Tau 病理学的扩散,从而阻止疾病的进展。在这项对ADAMANT临床试验的事后分析中,我们考察了AADvac1(一种靶向tau微管结合区(MTBR)的主动免疫疗法)在血浆p-tau217升高的亚组参与者中的表现,p-tau217升高表明与AD相关的神经病理学变化:ADAMANT是一项为期24个月的随机、安慰剂对照、平行组、双盲、多中心2期临床试验,对象为轻度AD患者。试验参与者以3:2的比例随机接受6次AADvac1或安慰剂治疗,每次间隔4周,然后再接受5次加强治疗,每次间隔14周。主要结果是安全性。次要结果是临床痴呆评分-方框总和(CDR-SB)、阿尔茨海默病合作研究-轻度认知障碍日常生活活动评分18项版(ADCS-ADL-MCI-18)和免疫原性。体积磁共振成像、血浆神经丝光(NfL)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)是探索性结果。这项事后分析的纳入标准是血浆p-tau217的基线水平高于AD的临界值:在196名ADAMANT参与者中,137人血浆p-tau217呈阳性(平均年龄71.4岁,59%为女性)。AADvac1在这一亚组中安全且耐受性良好。AADvac1 可使对数血浆 NfL 的累积率降低 56%,GFAP 的累积率降低 73%。CDR-SB和ADCS-ADL-MCI-18评分的治疗差异有利于AADvac1,但无统计学意义。AADvac1 对全脑体积没有影响,但在几个区域显著减少了大脑皮质组织的损失。重要的是,对研究结果的影响在抗 tau 抗体水平较高的参与者中更为明显:这些结果表明,AADvac1 tau免疫疗法可以减少神经变性和神经炎症的血浆生物标志物。这些发现以及对脑萎缩和认知能力的可能观察都是假设性的,值得在更大规模的临床试验中进一步评估:试验注册:EudraCT 2015-000630-30(初审)和 NCT02579252。
{"title":"Post hoc analysis of ADAMANT, a phase 2 clinical trial of active tau immunotherapy with AADvac1 in patients with Alzheimer's disease, positive for plasma p-tau217.","authors":"Branislav Kovacech, Nicholas C Cullen, Petr Novak, Jozef Hanes, Eva Kontsekova, Stanislav Katina, Vojtech Parrak, Michal Fresser, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Howard H Feldman, Bengt Winblad, Erik Stoops, Eugeen Vanmechelen, Norbert Zilka","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01620-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13195-024-01620-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spread of tau pathology closely correlates with the disease course and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Tau-targeting immunotherapies are being developed to stop the spread of tau pathology and thus halt disease progression. In this post hoc analysis of the ADAMANT clinical trial, we examined the performance of AADvac1, an active immunotherapy targeting the microtubule-binding region (MTBR) of tau, in a subgroup of participants with elevated plasma p-tau217, indicating AD-related neuropathological changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ADAMANT was a 24-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blinded, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial in subjects with mild AD. The trial participants were randomized 3:2 to receive six doses of AADvac1 or placebo at 4-week intervals, followed by five booster doses at 14-week intervals. The primary outcome was safety. The secondary outcomes were the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living score for Mild Cognitive Impairment 18-item version (ADCS-ADL-MCI-18), and immunogenicity. Volumetric MRI, plasma neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were exploratory outcomes. The inclusion criterion for this post-hoc analysis was a baseline plasma p-tau217 level above the cutoff for AD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 196 ADAMANT participants, 137 were positive for plasma p-tau217 (mean age 71.4 years, 59% women). AADvac1 was safe and well tolerated in this subgroup. AADvac1 reduced the rate of accumulation of log-plasma NfL by 56% and that of GFAP by 73%. The treatment differences in the CDR-SB and ADCS-ADL-MCI-18 scores favored AADvac1 but were not statistically significant. AADvac1 had no effect on whole-brain volume but nonsignificantly reduced the loss of brain cortical tissue in several regions. Importantly, the impact on the study outcomes was more pronounced in participants with higher anti-tau antibody levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that AADvac1 tau immunotherapy can reduce plasma biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. These findings and possible observations on brain atrophy and cognition are hypothesis-generating and warrant further evaluation in a larger clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EudraCT 2015-000630-30 (primary) and NCT02579252.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585249/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142694975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}