Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine最新文献

Purpose: Implementing efficacious physical activity interventions in real-world rural settings is needed because rural cancer survivors are more physically inactive and experience poorer health. To address this gap, this study evaluated effectiveness of an evidenced-based physical activity program (Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer [BEAT Cancer]) for rural women cancer survivors when implemented by community-based, non-research staff.

Methods: 16 rural women cancer survivors received BEAT Cancer implemented by a rural, community organization and non-research staff; physical activity, patient-reported outcomes, and social cognitive constructs were measured at baseline and post-program. Cancer survivors and interventionists completed program evaluations post-program.

Results: Cancer survivor mean age was 58±12 years; 62% were White. Mean months since diagnosis was 54±72; 69% had breast cancer. Significant improvements from pre- to post-program occurred for self-report weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (mean change [M] = 146±186, p = 0.009), anxiety (M = -1.3±1.8, p = 0.016), depression (M = -2.1±2.0, p = 0.001), self-efficacy (M = 20.9±30.5, p = 0.019), barriers interference (M = -15.0±14.1, p = 0.001), and social support (M = 5.0±7.4, p = 0.02). Cancer survivors ranked the program highly, identified strategies that were helpful (e.g., group activities, personalized exercise plan, etc.), and suggested additional implementation strategies (e.g., guide for home-based phase, etc.). Interventionists identified strategies (e.g., logistics, staff training and certification, cost, etc.) for enhancing organizational readiness for program delivery.

Conclusion: Evidence-based physical activity programs can be effective when implemented by non-research staff in rural settings. Further research testing strategies that improve implementation is needed.

Practical implications: Effectiveness and identified strategies supporting delivery when implemented by a rural organization can improve physical activity promotion for rural, at-risk populations.

Behavioral weight loss programs combining energy restriction and increased physical activity (PA) are generally successful in producing clinically significant weight loss (≥5%) over 3-6 mos. However, weight maintenance (≥ 2 yrs.) continues to be problematic, due in part to an inability of individuals to continue adherence to diet and PA recommendations. It is hypothesized that neurocognitive processes, specifically executive functions (EFs, i.e., inhibition, working memory, mental flexibility), underlie self-regulation, self-efficacy, and are essential for the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Behavioral weight loss programs generally attempt to improve self-regulation; however, these skills are difficult to implement long-term. Strengthening EFs through cognitive training may improve weight maintenance by improving self-efficacy and self-regulation, resulting in improved program attendance and improved adherence to dietary and PA recommendations. Although randomized trials have not been conducted to specifically evaluate this hypothesis, results from the available literature suggest the potential for cognitive training to improve weight maintenance.

Background: Despite the long-term health benefits of physical activity, many Americans across the lifespan do not meet the recommended levels. However, physical activity discussions in the clinic setting may hold promise. The purpose of this study aimed to understand health care providers' beliefs and practices about physical activity discussions being a part of patients' healthcare treatment.

Methods: Semi-structured, audiotaped interviews were conducted to elicit narratives from ten health care providers. Interview data were transcribed verbatim, then coded and analyzed by two qualitative researchers using NVivo12.

Results: Three major themes emerged: importance of regular PA counseling for vulnerable populations, patients' lack of regular physical activity, including subthemes of lack of time, current health conditions, and social determinants of health, and healthcare provider's reflections about their own physical activity.

Conclusion: Healthcare providers have an important role when it comes to promoting good health. Having physical activity discussions with patients at every clinic visit is a great opportunity to encourage patients to engage in healthy lifestyle behaviors such as regular physical activity. From this pilot study, implications for practice may include increased awareness of the healthcare providers to discuss physical activity at every visit, which may lead to improved provider-patient communications related to the benefits of daily physical activity behaviors. These discussions may even have a secondary gain of encouraging the providers themselves to adopt the healthy behavior and thereby serve as a role model for their patients.

Increased sedentary behavior has been an unintended consequence of social and physical distancing restrictions needed to limit transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19. Sedentary behavior is defined as any waking behavior characterized by an energy expenditure ≤1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs), while in a sitting, reclining, or lying posture. These restrictions negatively impact peoples' cardiometabolic and mental health and disproportionately affect certain sectors of the population, including racial/ethnic minorities. In part, the higher risk for complications of COVID-19 could be the result of increased prevalence of comorbid diseases. Further, regular participation and adherence to current physical activity guidelines, defined as at least 150 minutes per week of moderate intensity physical activity or muscle strengthening activities on 2 or more days a week, is challenging for many and may be especially difficult to achieve during the COVID-19 pandemic. A practical strategy to promote health and well-being during COVID-19 is reducing sedentary behavior. Reducing sedentary behaviors (e.g., breaking up periods of prolonged sitting with light-intensity physical activity) may be more easily achieved than physical activity for all individuals, including individuals of racial/ethnic decent, as it does not require purchasing equipment nor require compromising the physical restrictions necessary to slow the spread of COVID-19. The purpose of this commentary is to argue that sedentary behavior is a feasible, independent target to modify during COVID-19, particularly in minority populations, and to address this behavior we need to consider individual, environmental and policy-level factors.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing reactive balance training (RBT) in continuing care retirement communities, as a part of typical practice in these facilities.

Methods: RBT, a task-specific exercise program, consisted of repeatedly exposing participants to trip-like perturbations on a modified treadmill to improve reactive balance, and subsequently reduce fall risk. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with retirement community residents (RBT participants) and administrators, to assess the organizational context, perceptions of evidence for falls prevention, and facilitation strategies that could improve the likelihood of implementing RBT as a falls-prevention program.

Results: Contextual factors such as leadership support, culture of change, evaluation capabilities, and receptivity to RBT among administrators and health leaders at the participating retirement communities could facilitate future implementation. The cost associated with RBT (e.g. equipment and personnel), resident recruitment, and accessibility of RBT for many residents were identified as primary barriers related to the intervention. Participants perceived observable health benefits after completing RBT, had increased awareness toward tripping, and greater confidence with respect to mobility. Across interviewees potential barriers for implementation regarding facilitation revolved around the compatibility and customizability for different participant capabilities that would need to be considered before adopting RBT.

Conclusion: RBT could fill a need in retirement communities and the findings provide areas of context, characteristics of the intervention, and facilitation approaches that could improve uptake.

Purpose: The Resist Diabetes trial demonstrated that twice-per-week resistance training reduced prediabetes prevalence and improved strength among older adults with prediabetes. Our objective was to determine initial perceptions of patients and care providers in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) regarding Resist Diabetes (RD), and ultimately, inform adaptations to improve uptake of RD in the Veterans Health Administration.

Methods: A mixed-methods approach was utilized. Care providers (n=20) and veterans with prediabetes (n=12) were recruited to gauge perceptions of the RD program and identify barriers and facilitators to the program referral process and program implementation. Care provider perceptions of the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility were determined using a validated survey. Open-ended questionnaires and interview guides, based upon the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, were utilized to determine major and minor themes within the provider and veteran responses. To identify the dissemination potential of RD, the availability of onsite fitness facilities at VAMC facilities nationally (n=159) was assessed.

Results: Providers rated (scaled 1-5; 1=completely disagree, 5=completely agree) the RD program as appealing (4.8+/-0.1), appropriate (4.8+/-0.0), and feasible (4.6+/-0.2). Providers reported that prediabetes/diabetes is a significant problem in the VAMC, and that different prevention programs will appeal to different types of VAMC patients. Patients (n=12; 58% female; aged 65+/-10yrs; BMI 34+/-6 kg/m²; HbA1c 5.7+/-1.8%) expressed interest in an exercise-focused diabetes prevention program and defined key barriers: travel, transportation, and time constraints. Among the responding national VAMC sites, 85% (97/114) reported having an onsite fitness facility.

Conclusion: Salem VAMC care providers and veteran patients demonstrated positive perceptions of the Resist Diabetes program. Program adaptations are needed to address barriers to patient participation including travel, transportation and time constraints.

Evidence supports the use of technology supported multicomponent interventions for promoting weight loss. Many such programs include the opportunity to synchronously pair commercially available physical activity trackers (PA-T) with a goal to enhance weight loss outcomes. However, little is known about the reach and effectiveness of allowing participants to pair a PA-T within an existing online program.

Purpose: This matched cohort, quasi-experimental study aimed to determine 1) the proportion of participants that pair a PA-T to the existing program, 2) the representativeness of participants who pair a PA-T; 3) the relationship between pairing a PA-T, overall weight loss, and the likelihood of achieving a clinically meaningful weight loss; and 4) if pairing a PA-T with program participation is related to weight loss outcomes independently or collectively when considering other indices of program engagement.

Methods: Data collected over a four-year period included demographic self-report, objective weight data uploaded when participants weighed themselves at a self-serve program kiosk available to the community, and program engagement data (e.g., logins to program website). A range of analyses, including descriptive proportions, analyses of variance, and path analyses, were used to address the purposes of the study.

Results: Participants who paired a PA-T were more likely to be women (p<.001), African American (p<.001), and have a higher BMI (p<.05). Those who paired a PA-T lost on average an extra 1% body weight and were 1.4 times more likely to lose 5% body weight. Pairing a PA-T was related to other indices of online program engagement and both directly and indirectly contributed to weight loss outcomes (p<.05).

Conclusions: Pairing a PA-T within an online weight loss program appeals to groups that experience disparities related to obesity and predicts improvements in weight loss. More translational studies are needed to examine the role of personal psychosocial and environmental factors that may enhance or diminish the benefit of pairing a PA-T to evidence-based, online weight loss programs.