Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001680
Hunter L Terry, Deborah J Shim, Michelle M Doering, Shannon E Beermann, Roxane M Rampersad, Sara C Wood, Chiara Ghetti, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Jerry L Lowder
Importance: Genitourinary fistula is a rare complication of obstetric cerclage with limited evidence to guide prevention and management.
Objective: The aim of the study was to describe 5 new cases of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after cerclage and evaluate existing cases, including shared features, to generate hypothesis for future etiologic research.
Study design: Case series and scoping review.
Results: Five patients presented with VVF symptoms after cerclage placement; 4 were diagnosed during pregnancy, 1 postpartum. Two patients had prior cervical procedures and were noted to have difficult cerclage placements. Three cerclages remained until delivery, 1 was removed antepartum, and another was replaced. All VVFs were diagnosed by cystoscopy and were repaired postpartum transvaginally. In the scoping review, 14 studies met inclusion criteria, and 19 cases were identified. Compiled cases had a history of cervical procedure(s), shortened cervix, McDonald technique, anterior knot placement, and Mersilene tape use. Fistulas were identified by cystoscopy when performed. Most reports described VVFs near the bladder trigone and midline of the vagina. All VVFs required surgical repair.
Conclusions: Genitourinary fistula after cerclage is rare but may be more common after prior cervical surgery, shortened cervix, and McDonald cerclage. Methods to mitigate morbidity associated with fistula after cerclage placement include cystoscopy if bladder injury is suspected at the time of cerclage placement and consideration of abdominal cerclage when intravaginal access to the cervix is limited. Patients with urinary leakage after cerclage should be evaluated for genitourinary fistula, not just incontinence. Postpartum surgical repair remains the primary treatment for VVF, ideally by a vaginal approach.
{"title":"Genitourinary Fistulas After Cerclage: A Case Series and Scoping Review.","authors":"Hunter L Terry, Deborah J Shim, Michelle M Doering, Shannon E Beermann, Roxane M Rampersad, Sara C Wood, Chiara Ghetti, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Jerry L Lowder","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001680","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001680","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Genitourinary fistula is a rare complication of obstetric cerclage with limited evidence to guide prevention and management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to describe 5 new cases of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) after cerclage and evaluate existing cases, including shared features, to generate hypothesis for future etiologic research.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case series and scoping review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients presented with VVF symptoms after cerclage placement; 4 were diagnosed during pregnancy, 1 postpartum. Two patients had prior cervical procedures and were noted to have difficult cerclage placements. Three cerclages remained until delivery, 1 was removed antepartum, and another was replaced. All VVFs were diagnosed by cystoscopy and were repaired postpartum transvaginally. In the scoping review, 14 studies met inclusion criteria, and 19 cases were identified. Compiled cases had a history of cervical procedure(s), shortened cervix, McDonald technique, anterior knot placement, and Mersilene tape use. Fistulas were identified by cystoscopy when performed. Most reports described VVFs near the bladder trigone and midline of the vagina. All VVFs required surgical repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genitourinary fistula after cerclage is rare but may be more common after prior cervical surgery, shortened cervix, and McDonald cerclage. Methods to mitigate morbidity associated with fistula after cerclage placement include cystoscopy if bladder injury is suspected at the time of cerclage placement and consideration of abdominal cerclage when intravaginal access to the cervix is limited. Patients with urinary leakage after cerclage should be evaluated for genitourinary fistula, not just incontinence. Postpartum surgical repair remains the primary treatment for VVF, ideally by a vaginal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"737-746"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143782139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001555
Anna Pancheshnikov, Bryna J Harrington, Victoria L Handa, Liz I Yanes, Margot Le Neveu, Kristin M Voegtline, Sarah B Olson, Joan L Blomquist, Stephanie Jacobs, Danielle Patterson, Chi Chiung Grace Chen
Importance: The Latina population is the largest growing ethnic group in the United States with high levels of health disparities in urinary incontinence (UI) treatment and complications rates, which may be due to disproportionately high barriers to UI care-seeking among Latinas.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare barriers to UI care-seeking among Latina, non-Latina Black, and non-Latina White patients by utilizing the Barriers to Incontinence Care Seeking Questionnaire (BICS-Q) total scores, and to compare specific barriers utilizing BICS-Q subscales.
Study design: In this cross-sectional study, patients accessing primary care were recruited to complete the BICS-Q, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The BICS-Q total and subscale scores were compared among ethnic/racial groups.
Results: A total of 298 patients were included in the study with 83 Black, 144 Latina, and 71 White participants per self-identified ethnicity/race. The total BICS-Q score was highest for Latina participants, followed by White and Black participants (11.2 vs 8.2 vs 4.9, respectively, P < 0.0001). Latina participants had significantly higher BICS-Q subscale scores compared with Black participants with no significant differences between Latina and White participants. After controlling for potential confounders, Latina ethnicity/race was still associated with a higher BICS-Q score when compared to Black ethnicity/race ( P = 0.0077), and lower Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence scores remained independently associated with higher BICS-Q scores ( P = 0.0078).
Conclusions: In our study population, Latina patients and patients with lower UI knowledge experience higher barriers to UI care-seeking compared with Black patients and patients with higher UI knowledge. Addressing these barriers may increase care-seeking and improve health equity in the field.
{"title":"Urinary Incontinence Care-Seeking Barriers Among Latina Patients: What Are We Missing?","authors":"Anna Pancheshnikov, Bryna J Harrington, Victoria L Handa, Liz I Yanes, Margot Le Neveu, Kristin M Voegtline, Sarah B Olson, Joan L Blomquist, Stephanie Jacobs, Danielle Patterson, Chi Chiung Grace Chen","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001555","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Latina population is the largest growing ethnic group in the United States with high levels of health disparities in urinary incontinence (UI) treatment and complications rates, which may be due to disproportionately high barriers to UI care-seeking among Latinas.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to compare barriers to UI care-seeking among Latina, non-Latina Black, and non-Latina White patients by utilizing the Barriers to Incontinence Care Seeking Questionnaire (BICS-Q) total scores, and to compare specific barriers utilizing BICS-Q subscales.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, patients accessing primary care were recruited to complete the BICS-Q, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The BICS-Q total and subscale scores were compared among ethnic/racial groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 298 patients were included in the study with 83 Black, 144 Latina, and 71 White participants per self-identified ethnicity/race. The total BICS-Q score was highest for Latina participants, followed by White and Black participants (11.2 vs 8.2 vs 4.9, respectively, P < 0.0001). Latina participants had significantly higher BICS-Q subscale scores compared with Black participants with no significant differences between Latina and White participants. After controlling for potential confounders, Latina ethnicity/race was still associated with a higher BICS-Q score when compared to Black ethnicity/race ( P = 0.0077), and lower Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence scores remained independently associated with higher BICS-Q scores ( P = 0.0078).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study population, Latina patients and patients with lower UI knowledge experience higher barriers to UI care-seeking compared with Black patients and patients with higher UI knowledge. Addressing these barriers may increase care-seeking and improve health equity in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"757-766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141794251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001559
Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov
Importance: There is no consensus on how to define obstetric anal sphincter defects detected by 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS), and the reported rates vary significantly in the postpartum period.
Objective: The objective of this study was to establish a diagnostic strategy with a high and clinically relevant interrater reliability both early and late postpartum.
Study design: The study was prospective and observational, and 3D-EAUS was performed 10-14 days and 9-12 months postpartum in an unselected cohort of primiparous women with vacuum-assisted deliveries. Two experienced examiners evaluated the ultrasonographic results, which were divided into the categories intact, inconclusive, small, moderate, and large defects based on Starck scores. Three different diagnostic strategies were validated, and the prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values calculated.
Results: Of 334 eligible women, 184 (55.1%) completed both examinations. Disagreements involving small defects were predominant and observed in 34 and 39 cases, respectively, at the 2 time points. The highest overall agreement rates (91.3% and 92.4%, respectively) and PABAK values (0.83 and 0.85, respectively) were reached when the disagreements were minimized by dichotomizing the results into Starck scores >4 (designated a significant defect) versus Starck scores 0-4 (all others).
Conclusions: The interrater reliability of detecting small anal sphincter defects by 3D-EAUS was low at both time points for the 2 experienced raters. In contrast, the interrater reliability of detecting a significant defect was classified as almost perfect agreement at both time points.
{"title":"The Reliability of 3-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasonography Early and Late Postpartum.","authors":"Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001559","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001559","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is no consensus on how to define obstetric anal sphincter defects detected by 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS), and the reported rates vary significantly in the postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to establish a diagnostic strategy with a high and clinically relevant interrater reliability both early and late postpartum.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study was prospective and observational, and 3D-EAUS was performed 10-14 days and 9-12 months postpartum in an unselected cohort of primiparous women with vacuum-assisted deliveries. Two experienced examiners evaluated the ultrasonographic results, which were divided into the categories intact, inconclusive, small, moderate, and large defects based on Starck scores. Three different diagnostic strategies were validated, and the prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 334 eligible women, 184 (55.1%) completed both examinations. Disagreements involving small defects were predominant and observed in 34 and 39 cases, respectively, at the 2 time points. The highest overall agreement rates (91.3% and 92.4%, respectively) and PABAK values (0.83 and 0.85, respectively) were reached when the disagreements were minimized by dichotomizing the results into Starck scores >4 (designated a significant defect) versus Starck scores 0-4 (all others).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interrater reliability of detecting small anal sphincter defects by 3D-EAUS was low at both time points for the 2 experienced raters. In contrast, the interrater reliability of detecting a significant defect was classified as almost perfect agreement at both time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"790-798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001716
Nemi M Shah, Marc Toglia
{"title":"Global Surgical Packages: Developed by the AUGS Coding Committee.","authors":"Nemi M Shah, Marc Toglia","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001716","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"31 8","pages":"735-736"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001711
Evelyn F Hall, Sarah A Collins
{"title":"In Just 3 Minutes, You Can Bring Urogynecology Closer to Getting Its Own Specialty Code: Developed by the AUGS Coding Committee.","authors":"Evelyn F Hall, Sarah A Collins","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001711","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001711","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"31 8","pages":"733-734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001718
Julia K Shinnick, David Sheyn, Nazema Y Siddiqui
{"title":"Individuals With Impact: How You Can Shape the Future of Funding in Pelvic Floor Disorders: Erratum.","authors":"Julia K Shinnick, David Sheyn, Nazema Y Siddiqui","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001718","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"31 8","pages":"822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001682
Hoang-Hoa T Nguyen, Jennifer W H Wong, Olga Ramm, Julia Geynisman-Tan, Christina Lewicky-Gaupp, Kimberly Kenton, Margaret Mueller
Importance: Ileus and small bowel obstructions are known but rare complications associated with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy that can result in variable management.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical presentation, management and outcomes of ileus or small bowel obstructions after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Study design: This was a multicenter retrospective case series of postoperative ileus or small bowel obstruction after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Demographics, clinical, surgical, and complication characteristics were manually abstracted. Descriptive statistics were performed via SPSS along with associative and comparative analyses.
Results: Ileus or small bowel obstruction was diagnosed in 2.5%, 95% CI = 1.8,3.3%, of all minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy cases across institutions. Presentation for small bowel complication ranged from 1 to 2,432 days after surgery with 70% presenting within 14 days of the index surgery. Remoteness from the surgery was associated with whether the index team was involved in the management of the bowel complication. Patients who were conservatively managed were admitted for a significantly shorter amount of time with a mean length of stay of 4.52 (±3) days compared to 10.3 (±6, P < 0.001) days for those who were surgically managed.
Conclusions: Small bowel complication is a known rare risk following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Conservative management resolves the majority of cases and should be considered to reduce the risk of surgical morbidity or disruption of the mesh. Given that multiple clinical teams may encounter and manage these complications, our study highlights the importance of keeping a high index of suspicion and thoughtful communication about these events.
重要性:肠梗阻和小肠梗阻是已知的,但与微创骶colpop固定术相关的罕见并发症可能导致不同的处理。目的:本研究的目的是描述微创骶结肠固定术后肠梗阻或小肠阻塞的临床表现、处理和结果。研究设计:这是一个多中心回顾性病例系列,微创骶colpop固定术后肠梗阻或小肠梗阻。人工提取人口统计学、临床、手术和并发症特征。通过SPSS进行描述性统计以及关联分析和比较分析。结果:在所有微创骶colpop固定术病例中,肠梗阻或小肠梗阻的诊断率为2.5%,95% CI = 1.8,3.3%。小肠并发症的出现时间从手术后1天到2432天不等,70%在手术后14天内出现。手术距离远与指数组是否参与肠并发症的处理有关。保守治疗的患者入院时间明显较短,平均住院时间为4.52(±3)天,而手术治疗的患者住院时间为10.3(±6,P < 0.001)天。结论:微创骶髋固定术后小肠并发症是一种罕见的风险。保守治疗解决了大多数病例,应考虑降低手术并发症或补片破坏的风险。鉴于多个临床团队可能会遇到并处理这些并发症,我们的研究强调了保持高度怀疑和对这些事件进行深思熟虑沟通的重要性。
{"title":"Small Bowel Complications After Sacrocolpopexy: A Case Series.","authors":"Hoang-Hoa T Nguyen, Jennifer W H Wong, Olga Ramm, Julia Geynisman-Tan, Christina Lewicky-Gaupp, Kimberly Kenton, Margaret Mueller","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001682","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Ileus and small bowel obstructions are known but rare complications associated with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy that can result in variable management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to describe the clinical presentation, management and outcomes of ileus or small bowel obstructions after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective case series of postoperative ileus or small bowel obstruction after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Demographics, clinical, surgical, and complication characteristics were manually abstracted. Descriptive statistics were performed via SPSS along with associative and comparative analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ileus or small bowel obstruction was diagnosed in 2.5%, 95% CI = 1.8,3.3%, of all minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy cases across institutions. Presentation for small bowel complication ranged from 1 to 2,432 days after surgery with 70% presenting within 14 days of the index surgery. Remoteness from the surgery was associated with whether the index team was involved in the management of the bowel complication. Patients who were conservatively managed were admitted for a significantly shorter amount of time with a mean length of stay of 4.52 (±3) days compared to 10.3 (±6, P < 0.001) days for those who were surgically managed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Small bowel complication is a known rare risk following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Conservative management resolves the majority of cases and should be considered to reduce the risk of surgical morbidity or disruption of the mesh. Given that multiple clinical teams may encounter and manage these complications, our study highlights the importance of keeping a high index of suspicion and thoughtful communication about these events.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"816-821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143782140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001552
Rachel A High, Cassie B Ford, Victoria L Handa, Jennifer Anger
Importance: Dementia and urinary incontinence (UI) have been associated in cross-sectional studies. The temporal relationship between these 2 conditions is not well understood.
Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the risk of incident dementia in female adults with and without UI using the Medicare 5% Limited Data Set.
Study design: This retrospective cohort study matched females with UI to continent controls by index year, age, and dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility. A 2-year look back period was used to exclude prevalent dementia and neurologic disorders. The 5-year cumulative incidence of dementia was estimated for women with UI and controls. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the association of variables with dementia, adjusting for age, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility, race, and comorbidities.
Results: A total of 8,651 female beneficiaries with UI (n = 8,651) were more likely than matched controls (n = 8,651) to report White race and several medical comorbidities. The 5-year cumulative incidence of dementia diagnosis was lower in the UI versus controls (8.8% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis with adjustment for covariates, UI diagnosis was associated with a lower hazard of dementia diagnosis (hazard ratio 0.82 [0.74, 0.91], P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Among female Medicare beneficiaries without baseline neurologic disorders, having any UI diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of dementia diagnosis. Further studies assessing UI symptoms and dementia diagnosis with rigorous and valid assessment tools are needed to confirm this finding.
{"title":"Incidence of Dementia Among Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Urinary Incontinence.","authors":"Rachel A High, Cassie B Ford, Victoria L Handa, Jennifer Anger","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001552","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Dementia and urinary incontinence (UI) have been associated in cross-sectional studies. The temporal relationship between these 2 conditions is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the risk of incident dementia in female adults with and without UI using the Medicare 5% Limited Data Set.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study matched females with UI to continent controls by index year, age, and dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility. A 2-year look back period was used to exclude prevalent dementia and neurologic disorders. The 5-year cumulative incidence of dementia was estimated for women with UI and controls. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the association of variables with dementia, adjusting for age, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility, race, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,651 female beneficiaries with UI (n = 8,651) were more likely than matched controls (n = 8,651) to report White race and several medical comorbidities. The 5-year cumulative incidence of dementia diagnosis was lower in the UI versus controls (8.8% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis with adjustment for covariates, UI diagnosis was associated with a lower hazard of dementia diagnosis (hazard ratio 0.82 [0.74, 0.91], P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among female Medicare beneficiaries without baseline neurologic disorders, having any UI diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of dementia diagnosis. Further studies assessing UI symptoms and dementia diagnosis with rigorous and valid assessment tools are needed to confirm this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"750-756"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849208/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001721
Cassandra L Carberry, Paul K Tulikangas, Beri M Ridgeway, Sarah A Collins, Rony A Adam
{"title":"American Urogynecologic Society Best Practice Statement: Evaluation and Counseling of Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Erratum.","authors":"Cassandra L Carberry, Paul K Tulikangas, Beri M Ridgeway, Sarah A Collins, Rony A Adam","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001721","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"31 8","pages":"823"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001697
Jessica Hammett, Gina Northington
{"title":"To Stent or Not to Stent.","authors":"Jessica Hammett, Gina Northington","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001697","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001697","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"31 8","pages":"747-749"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}