Pub Date : 1999-02-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000101
R Hinchcliffe
{"title":"Is there still a consensus on impairment, disability and handicap in audiology?","authors":"R Hinchcliffe","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000101","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"67-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000101","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21090093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-02-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000096
K Robinson
Evidence-based medicine is the use of current best evidence in making decisions about individual patients. It involves formulating a question, searching for information, appraisal of the literature, implementation and subsequent audit. Two case studies involving a non-linear hearing aid and cochlear implantation are used to illustrate the process. Critical appraisal of the evidence-based medicine in the general literature shows little sign that the approach is effective and indicates that further rigorous evaluation is a priority. It is suggested that systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines should be a high priority for audiologists and that a working group of audiologists should form to promote their production.
{"title":"Evidence-based medicine and its implications for audiological science.","authors":"K Robinson","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based medicine is the use of current best evidence in making decisions about individual patients. It involves formulating a question, searching for information, appraisal of the literature, implementation and subsequent audit. Two case studies involving a non-linear hearing aid and cochlear implantation are used to illustrate the process. Critical appraisal of the evidence-based medicine in the general literature shows little sign that the approach is effective and indicates that further rigorous evaluation is a priority. It is suggested that systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines should be a high priority for audiologists and that a working group of audiologists should form to promote their production.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000096","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21090710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-02-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000100
M L French
Electrical impedance measurements can give useful information about the status of individual electrodes of a cochlear implant. Impedances within the normal range (when measured in the common ground mode of stimulation) suggest that current flow occurs in the tissue and fluid of the cochlea. Low impedance measurements may suggest that particular electrodes are short circuiting, whereas high impedances might be due to a broken electrode wire or an electrode only in contact with air. In the case discussed, low impedance measurements were recorded intra-operatively from a child with Mondini dysplasia on electrodes 1-13 of a Nucleus CI24M device. Post-operatively the impedances had returned to the expected range and were comparable with other patients implanted with the CI24M device. Possible reasons for this are discussed. It was thought that impedances were low intra-operatively due to a larger-than-normal proportion of fluid surrounding the electrode array, rather than short circuits occurring along the array, as suggested by the dps7 software.
{"title":"Electrical impedance measurements with the CI24M cochlear implant for a child with Mondini dysplasia.","authors":"M L French","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrical impedance measurements can give useful information about the status of individual electrodes of a cochlear implant. Impedances within the normal range (when measured in the common ground mode of stimulation) suggest that current flow occurs in the tissue and fluid of the cochlea. Low impedance measurements may suggest that particular electrodes are short circuiting, whereas high impedances might be due to a broken electrode wire or an electrode only in contact with air. In the case discussed, low impedance measurements were recorded intra-operatively from a child with Mondini dysplasia on electrodes 1-13 of a Nucleus CI24M device. Post-operatively the impedances had returned to the expected range and were comparable with other patients implanted with the CI24M device. Possible reasons for this are discussed. It was thought that impedances were low intra-operatively due to a larger-than-normal proportion of fluid surrounding the electrode array, rather than short circuits occurring along the array, as suggested by the dps7 software.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"61-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21090092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1999-02-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000099
S Uimonen, K Huttunen, K Jounio-Ervasti, M Sorri
The cross-sectional population sample studied here was randomly selected from the population register of northern Finland. The subjects comprised 10 different age groups between 2 and 75 years of age. Pure tone averages over the frequencies of both 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz and 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz - i.e. better ear hearing levels (BEHL) of BEHL0.5-2kH and BEHL0.5-4kHz - were calculated. The prevalence of various grades of hearing impairment was investigated among the 3518 people who participated in audiometric measurements. Two different classifications were used to grade the hearing impairment. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (1991), 94.3% of the subjects had normal hearing, whereas 3.8% had mild hearing impairment, 1.3% had moderate impairment, 0.4% severe impairment and 0.1% profound impairment. When the more recent EU definition (1996) was used, 85.3% of the subjects had normal hearing. Mild impairment was found in 11.5% of the subjects, moderate impairment in 2.8%, severe impairment in 0.3%, and profound in 0.1%. The difference between the two definitions mentioned above (resulting in different prevalence figures of hearing impairments) is clear. The WHO classification reveals the need for rehabilitation and can thus be used as a basis of resource allocation, whereas the EU proposal reveals even the mildest hearing impairments and hence better illustrates the real prevalence of impairment. The need for the current and future audiological services may be estimated from the prevalence rates of hearing impairments. The proportion of the Finnish elderly - the people most frequently using health services - is expected to increase from today's 15% to 23% within the next 20 years. The same phenomenon is to be expected in other Western societies.
{"title":"Do we know the real need for hearing rehabilitation at the population level? Hearing impairments in the 5- to 75-year-old cross-sectional Finnish population.","authors":"S Uimonen, K Huttunen, K Jounio-Ervasti, M Sorri","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cross-sectional population sample studied here was randomly selected from the population register of northern Finland. The subjects comprised 10 different age groups between 2 and 75 years of age. Pure tone averages over the frequencies of both 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz and 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz - i.e. better ear hearing levels (BEHL) of BEHL0.5-2kH and BEHL0.5-4kHz - were calculated. The prevalence of various grades of hearing impairment was investigated among the 3518 people who participated in audiometric measurements. Two different classifications were used to grade the hearing impairment. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (1991), 94.3% of the subjects had normal hearing, whereas 3.8% had mild hearing impairment, 1.3% had moderate impairment, 0.4% severe impairment and 0.1% profound impairment. When the more recent EU definition (1996) was used, 85.3% of the subjects had normal hearing. Mild impairment was found in 11.5% of the subjects, moderate impairment in 2.8%, severe impairment in 0.3%, and profound in 0.1%. The difference between the two definitions mentioned above (resulting in different prevalence figures of hearing impairments) is clear. The WHO classification reveals the need for rehabilitation and can thus be used as a basis of resource allocation, whereas the EU proposal reveals even the mildest hearing impairments and hence better illustrates the real prevalence of impairment. The need for the current and future audiological services may be estimated from the prevalence rates of hearing impairments. The proportion of the Finnish elderly - the people most frequently using health services - is expected to increase from today's 15% to 23% within the next 20 years. The same phenomenon is to be expected in other Western societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"53-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21090091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-12-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000087
A N Rasmussen, P A Osterhammel, P T Johannesen, B Borgkvist
The aim of this study was to provide statistical information on otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurements in new-born infants, which could be useful in the interpretation of results and could add some clinical parameters that might be used for future objective and automatic response evaluations. Transient evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) using maximum length sequences (MLS) were recorded in 129 full-term new-born infants between 48 and 72 hours of age. The use of MLS enabled stimulus rates of up to 2000/sec to be utilized. The analysis comprised five main issues: (1) signal to noise ratio (S/N); (2) derived non-linear responses; (3) a combination of derived non-linear emissions called compound non-linear emissions; (4) time/frequency analysis and (5) signal power analysis. The result of the analysis were as follows. (1) The largest S/N ratio was obtained when more than 60% of the recordings were rejected. (2) The derived non-linear emissions comprised level non-linear and rate non-linear responses, the latter obtained by subtraction of recordings at fixed stimulus level, but at different stimulus rates. The rapid suppression of emission amplitude as the stimulus rate increases is the basis for this non-linear response which also features stimulus cancellation. (3) The compound non-linear emissions, consisting of a sum of derived non-linear responses may prove efficient by proper selection of stimulus parameters, but did not in the present form show the expected improvements of amplitude and stimulus cancellation. (4) The time/frequency analysis, however, based on calculations of the instantaneous frequency as a function time after stimulus onset, showed a consistent tendency of falling frequency versus time after stimulus onset as a basic characteristic feature of OAE. (5) The analysis of the emission power as a function of time after stimulus onset showed that linear recordings in new-born infants are reliable, with stimulus ringing fully decayed 3 ms after the stimulus onset. The findings may prove useful in future attempts to develop screening equipment with automatic response evaluation for new-born infants. From a clinical point of view the MLS technique was successful when measuring emissions in neonates, owing to the fast recording time and the utilization of an efficient noise rejection paradigm.
{"title":"Neonatal hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences.","authors":"A N Rasmussen, P A Osterhammel, P T Johannesen, B Borgkvist","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to provide statistical information on otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurements in new-born infants, which could be useful in the interpretation of results and could add some clinical parameters that might be used for future objective and automatic response evaluations. Transient evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) using maximum length sequences (MLS) were recorded in 129 full-term new-born infants between 48 and 72 hours of age. The use of MLS enabled stimulus rates of up to 2000/sec to be utilized. The analysis comprised five main issues: (1) signal to noise ratio (S/N); (2) derived non-linear responses; (3) a combination of derived non-linear emissions called compound non-linear emissions; (4) time/frequency analysis and (5) signal power analysis. The result of the analysis were as follows. (1) The largest S/N ratio was obtained when more than 60% of the recordings were rejected. (2) The derived non-linear emissions comprised level non-linear and rate non-linear responses, the latter obtained by subtraction of recordings at fixed stimulus level, but at different stimulus rates. The rapid suppression of emission amplitude as the stimulus rate increases is the basis for this non-linear response which also features stimulus cancellation. (3) The compound non-linear emissions, consisting of a sum of derived non-linear responses may prove efficient by proper selection of stimulus parameters, but did not in the present form show the expected improvements of amplitude and stimulus cancellation. (4) The time/frequency analysis, however, based on calculations of the instantaneous frequency as a function time after stimulus onset, showed a consistent tendency of falling frequency versus time after stimulus onset as a basic characteristic feature of OAE. (5) The analysis of the emission power as a function of time after stimulus onset showed that linear recordings in new-born infants are reliable, with stimulus ringing fully decayed 3 ms after the stimulus onset. The findings may prove useful in future attempts to develop screening equipment with automatic response evaluation for new-born infants. From a clinical point of view the MLS technique was successful when measuring emissions in neonates, owing to the fast recording time and the utilization of an efficient noise rejection paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"355-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000087","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20938280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-12-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000092
A M Eckert, M Gizzi
Recording and quantifying eye movement is the basis of audiologic balance testing. The ability to record and quantify eye movement is a key part of the electronystagmography (ENG) test battery. With computerization, eye movements can be more accurately detected and analysed--testing the limits of the standard recording technique. In response to this, manufacturers are introducing alternative recording protocols. Specifically, infra-red video technology allows an accurate and sophisticated recording and analysis of eye motion in response to balance-related stimuli. The purpose of this technical note is to discuss the limitations of the EOG recording method and discuss the advantages that video-oculography offers.
{"title":"Video-oculography as part of the ENG battery.","authors":"A M Eckert, M Gizzi","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recording and quantifying eye movement is the basis of audiologic balance testing. The ability to record and quantify eye movement is a key part of the electronystagmography (ENG) test battery. With computerization, eye movements can be more accurately detected and analysed--testing the limits of the standard recording technique. In response to this, manufacturers are introducing alternative recording protocols. Specifically, infra-red video technology allows an accurate and sophisticated recording and analysis of eye motion in response to balance-related stimuli. The purpose of this technical note is to discuss the limitations of the EOG recording method and discuss the advantages that video-oculography offers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"411-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000092","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20938288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-12-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000090
E Seifert, A Lamprecht-Dinnesen, B Asfour, H Rotering, H G Bone, H H Scheld
Thirty patients undergoing open heart surgery under induced hypothermia had transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) recorded during cooling to 26.07 degrees C (standard deviation (SD) 4.25 degrees C) vesically measured temperature and 24.86 degrees C (SD 4.7 degrees C) nasopharyngeally measured temperature respectively. Subsequently tè patients were rewarmed until normal body temperature was reached again. There was a clear influence of body temperature on the amplitudes and reproducibilities of the TEOAE. The relationship of temperature and amplitude or reproducibility during the cooling phase was significantly different from that during rewarming. No TEOAE were measurable during cooling at a mean temperature lower than 33.41 degrees C (SD 2.04 degrees C) vesical temperature and 30.16 degrees C (SD 3.0 degrees C) nasopharyngeal temperature respectively. During rewarming the echoes became recognizable again at a mean temperature of 28.75 degrees C (SD 3.38 degrees C) vesical temperature and 27.49 degrees C (SD 2.99 degrees C) nasopharyngeal temperature. These results suggest a hysteresis in the relationship between the amplitude of TEOAE and temperature, similar to the well-established relationship between evoked potentials and temperature.
{"title":"The influence of body temperature on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.","authors":"E Seifert, A Lamprecht-Dinnesen, B Asfour, H Rotering, H G Bone, H H Scheld","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty patients undergoing open heart surgery under induced hypothermia had transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) recorded during cooling to 26.07 degrees C (standard deviation (SD) 4.25 degrees C) vesically measured temperature and 24.86 degrees C (SD 4.7 degrees C) nasopharyngeally measured temperature respectively. Subsequently tè patients were rewarmed until normal body temperature was reached again. There was a clear influence of body temperature on the amplitudes and reproducibilities of the TEOAE. The relationship of temperature and amplitude or reproducibility during the cooling phase was significantly different from that during rewarming. No TEOAE were measurable during cooling at a mean temperature lower than 33.41 degrees C (SD 2.04 degrees C) vesical temperature and 30.16 degrees C (SD 3.0 degrees C) nasopharyngeal temperature respectively. During rewarming the echoes became recognizable again at a mean temperature of 28.75 degrees C (SD 3.38 degrees C) vesical temperature and 27.49 degrees C (SD 2.99 degrees C) nasopharyngeal temperature. These results suggest a hysteresis in the relationship between the amplitude of TEOAE and temperature, similar to the well-established relationship between evoked potentials and temperature.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"387-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20938284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-12-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000091
S Wood, S Mason, A Farnsworth, A Davis, D A Curnock, M E Lutman
Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests were used in parallel to screen 862 neonates with risk factors for hearing loss. Seven neonates (0.81%) passed on TEOAE screen yet failed on ABR in one ear (six neonates) or both ears (one neonate). This combination of results has been termed 'anomalous'. Examination of audiometric results obtained on follow-up shows that in one ear of one neonate the result was consistent with the later confirmed audiogram shape. The explanation for the anomalous results in the remaining ears is unclear although neural maturation and the effects of hyperbilirubinaemia are possibilities. There were no instances of progressive or retrocochlear hearing loss identified. None of the seven neonates had better ear hearing loss of > or = 40 dB on long term follow-up.
{"title":"Anomalous screening outcomes from click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response tests.","authors":"S Wood, S Mason, A Farnsworth, A Davis, D A Curnock, M E Lutman","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests were used in parallel to screen 862 neonates with risk factors for hearing loss. Seven neonates (0.81%) passed on TEOAE screen yet failed on ABR in one ear (six neonates) or both ears (one neonate). This combination of results has been termed 'anomalous'. Examination of audiometric results obtained on follow-up shows that in one ear of one neonate the result was consistent with the later confirmed audiogram shape. The explanation for the anomalous results in the remaining ears is unclear although neural maturation and the effects of hyperbilirubinaemia are possibilities. There were no instances of progressive or retrocochlear hearing loss identified. None of the seven neonates had better ear hearing loss of > or = 40 dB on long term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"399-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000091","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20938287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-12-01DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000089
A Ringdahl, M Eriksson-Mangold, G Andersson
The Gothenburg Profile (GP) for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap was developed with content partly taken from the shortened Hearing Measurement Scale (HMS25). The GP consists of 20 items divided into two subscales. The first subscale measures Experienced Disability as to hearing speech (items 1-5) and sound localization (items 6-10). The second subscale targets the Experienced Handicap in social settings (items 11-15) and the personal reactions to the experienced handicap (items 16-20). In this study, data are presented for new hearing aid candidates (NewHA) (n=441) and for experienced hearing aid users (ExpHA) (n=476). Principal components factor analyses were conducted and a three-factor solution was obtained, supporting the two factors of the Experienced Disability subscale, but just confirming one factor in the Experienced Handicap subscale. The internal consistency reliability (coefficient alpha) was good (0.85 to 0.95) for the subscales as was the test-retest reliability. The ExpHA group expressed significantly greater disability (first subscale) as well as experienced handicap (second subscale). However, when controlling for hearing level the differences disappeared. The clinical use of the GP for assessment of rehabilitation needs is recommended.
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Gothenburg Profile for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap: applications with new hearing aid candidates and experienced hearing aid users.","authors":"A Ringdahl, M Eriksson-Mangold, G Andersson","doi":"10.3109/03005364000000089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Gothenburg Profile (GP) for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap was developed with content partly taken from the shortened Hearing Measurement Scale (HMS25). The GP consists of 20 items divided into two subscales. The first subscale measures Experienced Disability as to hearing speech (items 1-5) and sound localization (items 6-10). The second subscale targets the Experienced Handicap in social settings (items 11-15) and the personal reactions to the experienced handicap (items 16-20). In this study, data are presented for new hearing aid candidates (NewHA) (n=441) and for experienced hearing aid users (ExpHA) (n=476). Principal components factor analyses were conducted and a three-factor solution was obtained, supporting the two factors of the Experienced Disability subscale, but just confirming one factor in the Experienced Handicap subscale. The internal consistency reliability (coefficient alpha) was good (0.85 to 0.95) for the subscales as was the test-retest reliability. The ExpHA group expressed significantly greater disability (first subscale) as well as experienced handicap (second subscale). However, when controlling for hearing level the differences disappeared. The clinical use of the GP for assessment of rehabilitation needs is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":75616,"journal":{"name":"British journal of audiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"375-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03005364000000089","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"20938283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}