首页 > 最新文献

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
The rapid diagnosis of intraamniotic infection with nanopore sequencing.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.011
Piya Chaemsaithong, Roberto Romero, Pisut Pongchaikul, Puntabut Warintaksa, Paninee Mongkolsuk, Maolee Bhuwapathanapun, Kanyaphat Kotchompoo, Pattaraporn Nimsamer, Worarat Kruasuwan, Orrakanya Amnuaykiatlert, Pornpun Vivithanaporn, Arun Meyyazhagan, Awoniyi Awonuga, Rapeewan Settacomkul, Arunee Singhsnaeh, Warawut Laolerd, Pitak Santanirand, Iyarit Thaipisuttikul, Thidathip Wongsurawat, Piroon Jenjaroenpun
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraamniotic infection (defined as intraamniotic inflammation with microorganisms) is an important cause of the preterm labor syndrome. Methods for the detection of microorganisms in amniotic fluid are culture and/or polymerase chain reaction. However, both methods take time, and results are rarely available for clinical decision-making. Nanopore sequencing technology offers real-time, long-read sequencing that can produce rapid results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine 1) the diagnostic performance of the 16S rDNA nanopore sequencing method for the identification of microorganisms in patients with intraamniotic inflammation; and 2) the relationship between microbial burden and the intensity of the amniotic fluid inflammatory response.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a prospective cohort study that included singleton pregnancies presenting with symptoms of preterm labor with intact membranes or of preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes. Amniotic fluid samples were obtained for the evaluation of bacteria in the amniotic cavity using cultivation and polymerase chain reaction-based 16S Sanger sequencing methods. Participants were classified into 4 groups according to the results of an amniotic fluid culture, 16S Sanger sequencing, and an amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentration: 1) no intraamniotic infection and intraamniotic inflammation (interleukin-6 <2.6 ng/mL and no microorganisms in the amniotic cavity determined by culture or 16S Sanger sequencing); 2) microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity without intraamniotic inflammation, defined by the presence of bacteria detected by culture or 16S Sanger sequencing; 3) sterile intraamniotic inflammation (interleukin-6 ≥2.6 ng/mL without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity); and 4) intraamniotic infection (interkeukin-6 ≥2.6 ng/mL with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity). Patients who underwent a midtrimester amniocentesis, had no intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation, and delivered at term represented the control group. 16S rDNA nanopore sequencing was performed and the diagnostic indices for the identification of intraamniotic infection were determined. Bioinformatic analysis was carried out to identify microorganisms, and a read count of at least 100 or a read count exceeding that of the background species from the control group, along with a relative abundance of no less than 1%, was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1) 16S nanopore sequencing had a sensitivity of 88.9% (8/9), specificity of 95.4% (41/43), positive predictive value of 80.0% (8/10), negative predictive value of 97.6% (41/42), positive likelihood ratio of 19.1 (95% CI, 4.8-75.4), negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 (95% CI, 0.02-0.7), and an accuracy of 94.2% (49/52) for the identification of intraamniotic infection [prevalence, 17% (9/52)]; 2) the microbial load determined by 16S nanopore sequencing had a strong positive correlatio
{"title":"The rapid diagnosis of intraamniotic infection with nanopore sequencing.","authors":"Piya Chaemsaithong, Roberto Romero, Pisut Pongchaikul, Puntabut Warintaksa, Paninee Mongkolsuk, Maolee Bhuwapathanapun, Kanyaphat Kotchompoo, Pattaraporn Nimsamer, Worarat Kruasuwan, Orrakanya Amnuaykiatlert, Pornpun Vivithanaporn, Arun Meyyazhagan, Awoniyi Awonuga, Rapeewan Settacomkul, Arunee Singhsnaeh, Warawut Laolerd, Pitak Santanirand, Iyarit Thaipisuttikul, Thidathip Wongsurawat, Piroon Jenjaroenpun","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.011","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Intraamniotic infection (defined as intraamniotic inflammation with microorganisms) is an important cause of the preterm labor syndrome. Methods for the detection of microorganisms in amniotic fluid are culture and/or polymerase chain reaction. However, both methods take time, and results are rarely available for clinical decision-making. Nanopore sequencing technology offers real-time, long-read sequencing that can produce rapid results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To determine 1) the diagnostic performance of the 16S rDNA nanopore sequencing method for the identification of microorganisms in patients with intraamniotic inflammation; and 2) the relationship between microbial burden and the intensity of the amniotic fluid inflammatory response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study design: &lt;/strong&gt;We performed a prospective cohort study that included singleton pregnancies presenting with symptoms of preterm labor with intact membranes or of preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes. Amniotic fluid samples were obtained for the evaluation of bacteria in the amniotic cavity using cultivation and polymerase chain reaction-based 16S Sanger sequencing methods. Participants were classified into 4 groups according to the results of an amniotic fluid culture, 16S Sanger sequencing, and an amniotic fluid interleukin-6 concentration: 1) no intraamniotic infection and intraamniotic inflammation (interleukin-6 &lt;2.6 ng/mL and no microorganisms in the amniotic cavity determined by culture or 16S Sanger sequencing); 2) microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity without intraamniotic inflammation, defined by the presence of bacteria detected by culture or 16S Sanger sequencing; 3) sterile intraamniotic inflammation (interleukin-6 ≥2.6 ng/mL without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity); and 4) intraamniotic infection (interkeukin-6 ≥2.6 ng/mL with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity). Patients who underwent a midtrimester amniocentesis, had no intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation, and delivered at term represented the control group. 16S rDNA nanopore sequencing was performed and the diagnostic indices for the identification of intraamniotic infection were determined. Bioinformatic analysis was carried out to identify microorganisms, and a read count of at least 100 or a read count exceeding that of the background species from the control group, along with a relative abundance of no less than 1%, was used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;1) 16S nanopore sequencing had a sensitivity of 88.9% (8/9), specificity of 95.4% (41/43), positive predictive value of 80.0% (8/10), negative predictive value of 97.6% (41/42), positive likelihood ratio of 19.1 (95% CI, 4.8-75.4), negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 (95% CI, 0.02-0.7), and an accuracy of 94.2% (49/52) for the identification of intraamniotic infection [prevalence, 17% (9/52)]; 2) the microbial load determined by 16S nanopore sequencing had a strong positive correlatio","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143424742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Universal Screening and Valacyclovir for First Trimester Primary Cytomegalovirus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.009
Sarah K Dzubay, Amelia H Gagliuso, Megha Arora, Uma Doshi, Aaron B Caughey

Background: Universal prenatal screening for cytomegalovirus is not currently recommended in the United States as no effective interventions have previously been available. With growing evidence that treating maternal first trimester primary cytomegalovirus infections with valacyclovir reduces vertical transmission, universal screening may become an important tool in congenital cytomegalovirus prevention.

Objective: This study examined the cost-effectiveness of a universal screening approach for maternal cytomegalovirus in the first trimester of pregnancy followed by valacyclovir treatment in positive cases for prevention of the sequelae of congenital cytomegalovirus.

Study design: A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare outcomes of universal screening and subsequent valacyclovir treatment in a theoretical cohort of 2,869,141 individuals, the estimated number of pregnant people in the United States who receive prenatal care by the first trimester. Individuals found to be IgG+, IgM+, and to have low IgG avidity were considered to have primary cytomegalovirus infection and received valacyclovir. Outcomes included cases of vertical cytomegalovirus transmission, abortions, stillbirths, neonatal deaths, cases of hearing loss, cases of neurodevelopmental disabilities, costs, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Model inputs were derived from literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed via tornado analysis, univariable sensitivity analysis, and multivariable sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation.

Results: In our study, universal screening in the first trimester for primary cytomegalovirus and subsequent treatment with valacyclovir in positive cases decreased adverse outcomes by preventing 2,898 vertical transmissions, 94 abortions, 19 stillbirths, 11 neonatal deaths, 460 cases of hearing loss, and 263 cases of neurodevelopmental disability. Universal screening and subsequent treatment was the dominant strategy as it saved 242.2 million dollars and led to 3,437 additional QALYs. Tornado analysis demonstrated that there were no threshold values which would change the model results, when all variables were varied across a predetermined range. Univariable sensitivity analyses demonstrated that even with decreasing specificity of screening tests, decreasing maternal utility of neonatal hearing loss, and increasing the price of screening up to 17 times the current cost, universal screening remained the cost-effective strategy. Monte Carlo analysis demonstrated that the screening strategy remained cost-saving in 100 percent of trials.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that screening for first trimester primary cytomegalovirus may be a cost-saving intervention, as identification of cases allows for the provision of treatment, which in turn reduces vertical cytomegalovirus transmission and costly sequelae.

{"title":"Universal Screening and Valacyclovir for First Trimester Primary Cytomegalovirus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.","authors":"Sarah K Dzubay, Amelia H Gagliuso, Megha Arora, Uma Doshi, Aaron B Caughey","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal prenatal screening for cytomegalovirus is not currently recommended in the United States as no effective interventions have previously been available. With growing evidence that treating maternal first trimester primary cytomegalovirus infections with valacyclovir reduces vertical transmission, universal screening may become an important tool in congenital cytomegalovirus prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the cost-effectiveness of a universal screening approach for maternal cytomegalovirus in the first trimester of pregnancy followed by valacyclovir treatment in positive cases for prevention of the sequelae of congenital cytomegalovirus.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare outcomes of universal screening and subsequent valacyclovir treatment in a theoretical cohort of 2,869,141 individuals, the estimated number of pregnant people in the United States who receive prenatal care by the first trimester. Individuals found to be IgG+, IgM+, and to have low IgG avidity were considered to have primary cytomegalovirus infection and received valacyclovir. Outcomes included cases of vertical cytomegalovirus transmission, abortions, stillbirths, neonatal deaths, cases of hearing loss, cases of neurodevelopmental disabilities, costs, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Model inputs were derived from literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed via tornado analysis, univariable sensitivity analysis, and multivariable sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, universal screening in the first trimester for primary cytomegalovirus and subsequent treatment with valacyclovir in positive cases decreased adverse outcomes by preventing 2,898 vertical transmissions, 94 abortions, 19 stillbirths, 11 neonatal deaths, 460 cases of hearing loss, and 263 cases of neurodevelopmental disability. Universal screening and subsequent treatment was the dominant strategy as it saved 242.2 million dollars and led to 3,437 additional QALYs. Tornado analysis demonstrated that there were no threshold values which would change the model results, when all variables were varied across a predetermined range. Univariable sensitivity analyses demonstrated that even with decreasing specificity of screening tests, decreasing maternal utility of neonatal hearing loss, and increasing the price of screening up to 17 times the current cost, universal screening remained the cost-effective strategy. Monte Carlo analysis demonstrated that the screening strategy remained cost-saving in 100 percent of trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate that screening for first trimester primary cytomegalovirus may be a cost-saving intervention, as identification of cases allows for the provision of treatment, which in turn reduces vertical cytomegalovirus transmission and costly sequelae.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143412959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized Trial of Postpartum Ibuprofen in Severe Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.012
Christina A Penfield, Megan C Oakes, Deysi Caballero, Lindsay N Marty, Dana S Berger, Michael P Nageotte, Jennifer A Mcnulty

Background: Ibuprofen has been shown to increased blood pressure in nonpregnant adults with hypertension, but its impact on blood pressure when used for postpartum analgesia in patients with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is less clear, particularly for those with severe hypertension.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of ibuprofen on postpartum blood pressure outcomes in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with severe hypertension.

Study design: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with severe hypertension to receive a postpartum analgesic regimen with either ibuprofen 600mg or acetaminophen 650mg (control) every 6 hours. The primary outcome was severe hypertension during postpartum hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included other measures of blood pressure control such as antihypertensive medication use and average postpartum mean arterial pressure, and outpatient blood pressure as well as patient satisfaction, pain control, and diuresis. A sample size of 132 was needed to detect a 35% difference in severe postpartum hypertension.

Results: We enrolled 140 participants from January 2017 to October 2019. The prevalence of severe hypertension postpartum did not differ between participants receiving ibuprofen (38.6%) versus control (41.4%); the absolute difference was 2.8 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -13.1% to 18.5%, p= 0.73. There was no difference between the ibuprofen and control groups for antihypertensive medication use (35.7% versus 40.0%, p=0.60) or average postpartum mean arterial pressure (95.7+8.2 versus 95.9+9.5, p=0.91, respectively). Measures of outpatient blood pressure, patient satisfaction, diuresis, and pain control were also similar.

Conclusion: In patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with severe hypertension, use of ibuprofen postpartum did not increase the prevalence of postpartum severe hypertension. Ibuprofen use did not impact other blood pressure outcomes, pain control, or patient satisfaction. These findings support ibuprofen use during the postpartum period in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

{"title":"A Randomized Trial of Postpartum Ibuprofen in Severe Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.","authors":"Christina A Penfield, Megan C Oakes, Deysi Caballero, Lindsay N Marty, Dana S Berger, Michael P Nageotte, Jennifer A Mcnulty","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ibuprofen has been shown to increased blood pressure in nonpregnant adults with hypertension, but its impact on blood pressure when used for postpartum analgesia in patients with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is less clear, particularly for those with severe hypertension.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of ibuprofen on postpartum blood pressure outcomes in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with severe hypertension.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with severe hypertension to receive a postpartum analgesic regimen with either ibuprofen 600mg or acetaminophen 650mg (control) every 6 hours. The primary outcome was severe hypertension during postpartum hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included other measures of blood pressure control such as antihypertensive medication use and average postpartum mean arterial pressure, and outpatient blood pressure as well as patient satisfaction, pain control, and diuresis. A sample size of 132 was needed to detect a 35% difference in severe postpartum hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 140 participants from January 2017 to October 2019. The prevalence of severe hypertension postpartum did not differ between participants receiving ibuprofen (38.6%) versus control (41.4%); the absolute difference was 2.8 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -13.1% to 18.5%, p= 0.73. There was no difference between the ibuprofen and control groups for antihypertensive medication use (35.7% versus 40.0%, p=0.60) or average postpartum mean arterial pressure (95.7+8.2 versus 95.9+9.5, p=0.91, respectively). Measures of outpatient blood pressure, patient satisfaction, diuresis, and pain control were also similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with severe hypertension, use of ibuprofen postpartum did not increase the prevalence of postpartum severe hypertension. Ibuprofen use did not impact other blood pressure outcomes, pain control, or patient satisfaction. These findings support ibuprofen use during the postpartum period in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143405069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adherence to cervical cancer screening among sexual and racial/ethnic minorities during the covid-19 pandemic in the United States.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.008
Joël Fokom Domgue, Monalisa Chandra, Robert Yu, Sanjay Shete
{"title":"Adherence to cervical cancer screening among sexual and racial/ethnic minorities during the covid-19 pandemic in the United States.","authors":"Joël Fokom Domgue, Monalisa Chandra, Robert Yu, Sanjay Shete","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Challenges in cesarean scar niche evaluation: insights from ultrasound and tissue analysis.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.001
Kobra Tahermanesh, Leila Allahqoli, Behnoosh Bozorgmehr, Ibrahim Alkatout
{"title":"Challenges in cesarean scar niche evaluation: insights from ultrasound and tissue analysis.","authors":"Kobra Tahermanesh, Leila Allahqoli, Behnoosh Bozorgmehr, Ibrahim Alkatout","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vacuum extraction in occiput posterior position: how ultrasound improve the outcome.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.005
Andrea Dall'Asta, Veronica Falcone, Tullio Ghi
{"title":"Vacuum extraction in occiput posterior position: how ultrasound improve the outcome.","authors":"Andrea Dall'Asta, Veronica Falcone, Tullio Ghi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device use and risk of gynecologic and breast cancers: a call for further research.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.046
Haojie Cai, Shanshan Cheng, Yu Wang
{"title":"Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device use and risk of gynecologic and breast cancers: a call for further research.","authors":"Haojie Cai, Shanshan Cheng, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.046","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.046","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device use and risk of gynecologic and breast cancers: the need for further evidence.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.047
Huan Yi, Xiangqin Zheng, Jianguang Ji
{"title":"Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device use and risk of gynecologic and breast cancers: the need for further evidence.","authors":"Huan Yi, Xiangqin Zheng, Jianguang Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.047","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.01.047","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pregnancy Outcomes Following Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: an Australian Cohort Study.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.007
Tara Finkelstein, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Franca Agresta, Genia Rozen, Kate Stern, Beverley Vollenhoven, Sally Catt, Fabrizzio Horta

Background: ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is an increasingly utilized fertility preservation method in young women, with this technique being largely implemented across Europe and Australia. Australia is a pioneer of OTC, but the clinical perinatal outcomes are currently unknown for the Australian population. These outcomes are important as they contribute to the global understanding of which patients can benefit from this fertility preservation option.

Objective: To examine the pregnancy and mortality outcomes of patients who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation and/or ovarian tissue transplantation in Victoria, Australia, and investigate predictors of success.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation from July 1995 to July 2022 at the largest OTC center in Victoria, Australia. Patients over the age of 18 at the time of the study were included in the study. Perinatal and mortality data were obtained through data linkage from the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection and Births Deaths and Marriages databases.

Results: Overall, 593 patients had undergone OTC between July 1995 and July 2022 in Victoria, Australia. All 593 patients were successfully linked to the perinatal and mortality databases, of whom six (1.0%) had pregnancies lacking perinatal data, and 17 had mortality data not reflected in the linkage but next of kin reported their deaths to the OTC providing clinic. Of this cohort, 48 (8.1%) underwent ovarian tissue transplantation and 106 (17.9%) died from complications of their medical indication for tissue freezing. A total of 192 neonates from 114 women were reported from both transplant (n=12/48, 25.0%) and non-transplant (n=102/545, 18.7%) cohorts. Most women had reported pregnancies by 15 years after OTC, with transplant cases having a similar overall pregnancy rate as per the time-to-event analysis (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio 1.378, 95% CI 0.755 - 2.515, p = 0.296).

Conclusion: This is a large single-center cohort study within the southern hemisphere that investigates patients who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation, with one in five women achieving a pregnancy, emphasizing the clinical feasibility of OTC as a fertility preservation option for future fertility counseling.

背景:卵巢组织冷冻保存(OTC)是年轻女性越来越常用的一种生育力保存方法,这项技术在欧洲和澳大利亚已得到广泛应用。澳大利亚是 OTC 的先驱,但目前澳大利亚人口的临床围产期结果尚不清楚。这些结果非常重要,因为它们有助于全球了解哪些患者可以从这种生育力保存方法中获益:研究设计:研究设计:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括1995年7月至2022年7月期间在澳大利亚维多利亚州最大的OTC中心接受卵巢组织冷冻保存的患者。研究对象包括研究时年满18岁的患者。围产期和死亡率数据通过维多利亚州围产期数据收集和出生、死亡和婚姻数据库的数据链接获得:1995年7月至2022年7月期间,澳大利亚维多利亚州共有593名患者接受了OTC手术。所有593名患者都与围产期和死亡率数据库成功建立了链接,其中6人(1.0%)的妊娠缺乏围产期数据,17人的死亡率数据未反映在链接中,但其近亲向提供OTC的诊所报告了他们的死亡。在这批患者中,48人(8.1%)接受了卵巢组织移植,106人(17.9%)死于组织冷冻医学指征的并发症。据报告,移植组(12/48,25.0%)和非移植组(102/545,18.7%)共有 114 名妇女的 192 名新生儿。大多数妇女在 OTC 15 年后报告怀孕,根据时间到事件分析,移植病例的总体怀孕率相似(调整后的子分布危险比 1.378,95% CI 0.755 - 2.515,p = 0.296):这是南半球的一项大型单中心队列研究,研究对象是接受卵巢组织冷冻保存的患者,其中五分之一的女性成功怀孕,强调了卵巢组织冷冻保存作为一种生育力保存方式在临床上的可行性,并为今后的生育咨询提供了参考。
{"title":"Pregnancy Outcomes Following Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: an Australian Cohort Study.","authors":"Tara Finkelstein, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Franca Agresta, Genia Rozen, Kate Stern, Beverley Vollenhoven, Sally Catt, Fabrizzio Horta","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) is an increasingly utilized fertility preservation method in young women, with this technique being largely implemented across Europe and Australia. Australia is a pioneer of OTC, but the clinical perinatal outcomes are currently unknown for the Australian population. These outcomes are important as they contribute to the global understanding of which patients can benefit from this fertility preservation option.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the pregnancy and mortality outcomes of patients who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation and/or ovarian tissue transplantation in Victoria, Australia, and investigate predictors of success.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation from July 1995 to July 2022 at the largest OTC center in Victoria, Australia. Patients over the age of 18 at the time of the study were included in the study. Perinatal and mortality data were obtained through data linkage from the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection and Births Deaths and Marriages databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 593 patients had undergone OTC between July 1995 and July 2022 in Victoria, Australia. All 593 patients were successfully linked to the perinatal and mortality databases, of whom six (1.0%) had pregnancies lacking perinatal data, and 17 had mortality data not reflected in the linkage but next of kin reported their deaths to the OTC providing clinic. Of this cohort, 48 (8.1%) underwent ovarian tissue transplantation and 106 (17.9%) died from complications of their medical indication for tissue freezing. A total of 192 neonates from 114 women were reported from both transplant (n=12/48, 25.0%) and non-transplant (n=102/545, 18.7%) cohorts. Most women had reported pregnancies by 15 years after OTC, with transplant cases having a similar overall pregnancy rate as per the time-to-event analysis (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio 1.378, 95% CI 0.755 - 2.515, p = 0.296).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is a large single-center cohort study within the southern hemisphere that investigates patients who have undergone ovarian tissue cryopreservation, with one in five women achieving a pregnancy, emphasizing the clinical feasibility of OTC as a fertility preservation option for future fertility counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing comprehensive care for high-risk pregnancies: integrating social and clinical perspectives.
IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.002
Zhen Deng, Lincheng Duan, Kai Wang
{"title":"Advancing comprehensive care for high-risk pregnancies: integrating social and clinical perspectives.","authors":"Zhen Deng, Lincheng Duan, Kai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1