Background and purpose
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether acupuncture combined with other traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapies is more effective in the treatment of peripheral facial palsy (PFP) than acupuncture alone.
Methods
Eight databases were searched until May 2025. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data on study characteristics and used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2 (RoB2) to assess the risk of bias of the included studies.
Results
266 articles were included. Results showed that compared with acupuncture alone, acupuncture combined with tuina and cupping (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 99.33%) was the most effective intervention for improving the overall effective rate; acupuncture combined with topical application of TCM (SUCRA = 90.61%) was the optimal approach for enhancing facial nerve function (House-Brackmann (H
B) scale); acupuncture combined with herbal fumigation and steaming therapy (SUCRA = 80.40%) was the best intervention for improving social function (Facial Disability Index - Social Function (FDIS)) in patients with facial paralysis; acupuncture combined with pricking blood (SUCRA = 87.62%) was the most effective method for improving physical function (Facial Disability Index - Physical Function (FDIP)) in patients with facial paralysis; and acupuncture combined with cupping and pricking blood (SUCRA = 86.90%) was associated with the lowest incidence of adverse reactions.
Conclusion
This study showed that interventions such as acupuncture+tuina+cupping, acupuncture+topical application of TCM, acupuncture+herbal fumigation and steaming therapy, and acupuncture+pricking blood are all associated with facial nerve recovery and demonstrate superior efficacy compared with acupuncture alone.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
